Tidal Volume-Dependent Activation of the Renin-Angiotensin System in Experimental Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury

Intra- and postoperative relative angiotensin II deficiency in patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery

Introduction

The classical axis of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) makes an important contribution to blood pressure regulation under general anesthesia via the vasopressor angiotensin II (Ang II). As part of the alternative RAS, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) modulates the pro-inflammatory and fibrotic effects of Ang II by processing it into the organ-protective Ang 1-7, which is cleaved to Ang 1-5 by ACE. Although the levels of ACE2 may be associated with postoperative complications, alternative RAS metabolites have never been studied perioperatively. This study was designed to investigate the perioperative kinetics and balance of both RAS axes around major abdominal surgery.

Methods

In this observational cohort study, 35 patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery were included. Blood sampling was performed before and after induction of anesthesia, at 1 h after skin incision, at the end of surgery, and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, and 7. The equilibrium concentrations of Ang I-IV, Ang 1-7, and Ang 1-5 in plasma were quantified using mass spectrometry. The plasma protein levels of ACE and ACE2 were measured with ELISA.

Results

Surgery caused a rapid, transient, and primarily renin-dependent activation of both RAS axes that returned to baseline on POD 1, followed by suppression. After induction, the Ang II/Ang I ratio persistently decreased, while the ACE levels started to increase on POD 1 (all p < 0.01 versus before anesthesia). Conversely, the ACE2 levels increased on POD 3 and 7 (both p < 0.001 versus before anesthesia), when the median Ang 1-7 concentrations were unquantifiably low.

Discussion

The postoperative elevation of ACE2 may prolong the decrease of the Ang II/Ang I ratio through the increased processing of Ang II. Further clarification of the intraoperative factors leading to relative Ang II deficiency and the sources of postoperatively elevated ACE2 is warranted.

Angiotensin II treatment is associated with improved oxygenation in ARDS patients with refractory vasodilatory shock

BACKGROUND

The physiological effects of renin-angiotensin system modulation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain controversial and have not been investigated in randomized trials. We sought to determine whether angiotensin-II treatment is associated with improved oxygenation in shock-associated ARDS.

METHODS

Post-hoc subgroup analysis of the Angiotensin Therapy for High Output Shock (ATHOS-3) trial. We studied patients who met modified Berlin ARDS criteria at enrollment. The primary outcome was PaO2/FiO2-ratio (P:F) at 48-h adjusted for baseline P:F. Secondary outcomes included oxygenation index, ventilatory ratio, PEEP, minute-ventilation, hemodynamic measures, patients alive and ventilator-free by day-7, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of 81 ARDS patients, 34 (42%) and 47 (58%) were randomized to angiotensin-II or placebo, respectively. In angiotensin-II patients, mean P:F increased from 155 mmHg (SD: 69) at baseline to 265 mmHg (SD: 160) at hour-48 compared with no change with placebo (148 mmHg (SD: 63) at baseline versus 164 mmHg (SD: 74) at hour-48)(baseline-adjusted difference: + 98.4 mmHg [95%CI 35.2-161.5], p = 0.0028). Similarly, oxygenation index decreased by - 6.0 cmH2O/mmHg at hour-48 with angiotensin-II versus - 0.4 cmH2O/mmHg with placebo (baseline-adjusted difference: -4.8 cmH2O/mmHg, [95%CI - 8.6 to - 1.1], p = 0.0273). There was no difference in PEEP, minute ventilation, or ventilatory ratio. Twenty-two (64.7%) angiotensin-II patients had sustained hemodynamic response to treatment at hour-3 versus 17 (36.2%) placebo patients (absolute risk-difference: 28.5% [95%CI 6.5-47.0%], p = 0.0120). At day-7, 7/34 (20.6%) angiotensin-II patients were alive and ventilator-free versus 5/47(10.6%) placebo patients. Day-28 mortality was 55.9% in the angiotensin-II group versus 68.1% in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

In post-hoc analysis of the ATHOS-3 trial, angiotensin-II was associated with improved oxygenation versus placebo among patients with ARDS and catecholamine-refractory vasodilatory shock. These findings provide a physiologic rationale for trials of angiotensin-II as treatment for ARDS with vasodilatory shock.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT02338843 (Registered January 14th 2015).

Nicotine plays a protective role in rats with induced viral pneumonia with polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid through α7nAChR

Objective

To study the effect of nicotine in rat model of pneumonia induced by polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid [Poly (I:C)] and explore the underlying mechanism.

Methods

Twenty-four healthy adult male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (200-250 g) were randomly divided into normal saline control group (NS group); Poly (I:C) group; nicotine group (NIC group); and α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAChR) antagonist group (α-BGT group) (n = 6 each). Rats in the Poly (I: C), NIC, and α-BGT groups were administered 1.5 mg/mL 100 μL Poly (I:C) intranasally to establish pneumonia model. In α-BGT group, 1 μg/kg α-bungarotoxin (α-BGT) was intraperitoneally injected 45 min before intranasal Poly (I:C), and 400 μg/kg nicotine was intraperitoneally injected 15 min after α-BGT injection. The NIC group received an equal volume of NS in place of α-BGT while the other treatments were same. The Poly (I:C) group received equal volume of NS in place of nicotine while the other treatments were same as in NIC group. In the NS group, only NS was administered at all three time points. PaCO2, PaO2, and PaO2/FiO2 levels were determined 24 h after administration of Poly (I:C). After euthanization, rat lung tissues were extracted for pathological examination, and wet weight/dry weight (W/D ratio) was determined. Expression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and interferon (IFN)-γ in lung tissue was determined by ELISA. q-PCR was used to detect nuclear factor kappa-B P65 (NF-κBP65).

Results

Compared with NS group, Poly (I:C) and α-BGT groups showed significantly increased W/D ratio, PaCO2, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IFN-γ content, NF-κB P65 expression, and reduced PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 (p < 0.05), along with obvious signs of pathological injury. Nicotine pre-treatment reduced W/D ratio, PaCO2, proinflammatory cytokines, NF-κBP65 expression, and increased PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 levels. The above effects were negated in α-BGT group.

Conclusion

Pre-administration of nicotine improved Poly (I:C)-induced pneumonia by activating the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway.

Effect of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Initiation on Organ Support-Free Days in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

Objective

To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non-critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was organ support-free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes.

RESULTS

On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support-free days among critically ill patients was 10 (-1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (-1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support-free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02735707.

Targeting the renin angiotensin system for respiratory diseases

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays an indispensable role in regulating blood pressure through its effects on fluid and electrolyte balance. As an aside, cumulative evidence from experimental to clinical studies supports the notion that dysregulation of RAS contributes to the pro-inflammatory, pro-oxidative, and pro-fibrotic processes that occur in pulmonary diseases like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and acute lung injury (ALI). Pharmacological intervention of the various RAS components can be a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of these respiratory diseases. In this chapter, we first give a recent update on the RAS, and then compile, review, and analyse recent reports on targeting RAS components as treatments for respiratory diseases. Inhibition of the pro-inflammatory renin, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), angiotensin (Ang) II, and Ang II type 1 receptor (AT1R) axis, and activation of the protective ACE2, AT2R, Ang (1-7), and Mas receptor axis have demonstrated varying degrees of efficacies in experimental respiratory disease models or in human trials. The newly identified alamandine/Mas-related G-protein-coupled receptor member D pathway has shown some therapeutic promise as well. However, our understanding of the RAS ligand-and-receptor interactions is still inconclusive, and the modes of action and signaling cascade mediating the newly identified RAS receptors remain to be better characterized. Clinical data are obviously lacking behind the promising pre-clinical findings of certain well-established molecules targeting at different pathways of the RAS in respiratory diseases. Translational human studies should be the focus for RAS drug development in lung diseases in the next decade.

Combined angiotensin-converting enzyme and aminopeptidase inhibition for treatment of experimental ventilator-induced lung injury in mice

Introduction: Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) may aggravate critical illness. Although angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition has beneficial effects in ventilator-induced lung injury, its clinical application is impeded by concomitant hypotension. We hypothesized that the aminopeptidase inhibitor ALT-00 may oppose the hypotension induced by an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and that this combination would activate the alternative renin-angiotensin system (RAS) axis to counteract ventilator-induced lung injury. Methods: In separate experiments, C57BL/6 mice were mechanically ventilated with low (LVT, 6 mL/kg) and high tidal volumes (HVT, 30 mL/kg) for 4 h or remained unventilated (sham). High tidal volume-ventilated mice were treated with lisinopril (0.15 μg/kg/min) ± ALT-00 at 2.7, 10 or 100 μg/kg/min. Blood pressure was recorded at baseline and after 4 h. Lung histology was evaluated for ventilator-induced lung injury and the angiotensin (Ang) metabolite profile in plasma (equilibrium levels of Ang I, Ang II, Ang III, Ang IV, Ang 1-7, and Ang 1-5) was measured with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry at the end of the experiment. Angiotensin concentration-based markers for renin, angiotensin-converting enzyme and alternative renin-angiotensin system activities were calculated. Results: High tidal volume-ventilated mice treated with lisinopril showed a significant drop in the mean arterial pressure at 4 h compared to baseline, which was prevented by adding ALT-00 at 10 and 100 μg/kg/min. Ang I, Ang II and Ang 1-7 plasma equilibrium levels were elevated in the high tidal volumes group versus the sham group. Lisinopril reduced Ang II and slightly increased Ang I and Ang 1-7 levels versus the untreated high tidal volumes group. Adding ALT-00 at 10 and 100 μg/kg/min increased Ang I and Ang 1-7 levels versus the high tidal volume group, and partly prevented the downregulation of Ang II levels caused by lisinopril. The histological lung injury score was higher in the high tidal volume group versus the sham and low tidal volume groups, and was attenuated by lisinopril ± ALT-00 at all dose levels. Conclusion: Combined angiotensin-converting enzyme plus aminopeptidase inhibition prevented systemic hypotension and maintained the protective effect of lisinopril. In this study, a combination of lisinopril and ALT-00 at 10 μg/kg/min appeared to be the optimal approach, which may represent a promising strategy to counteract ventilator-induced lung injury that merits further exploration.

The systemic renin-angiotensin system in COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2 gains cell entry via angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) 2, a membrane-bound enzyme of the "alternative" (alt) renin-angiotensin system (RAS). ACE2 counteracts angiotensin II by converting it to potentially protective angiotensin 1-7. Using mass spectrometry, we assessed key metabolites of the classical RAS (angiotensins I-II) and alt-RAS (angiotensins 1-7 and 1-5) pathways as well as ACE and ACE2 concentrations in 159 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, stratified by disease severity (severe, n = 76; non-severe: n = 83). Plasma renin activity (PRA-S) was calculated as the sum of RAS metabolites. We estimated ACE activity using the angiotensin II:I ratio (ACE-S) and estimated systemic alt-RAS activation using the ratio of alt-RAS axis metabolites to PRA-S (ALT-S). We applied mixed linear models to assess how PRA-S and ACE/ACE2 concentrations affected ALT-S, ACE-S, and angiotensins II and 1-7. Median angiotensin I and II levels were higher with severe versus non-severe COVID-19 (angiotensin I: 86 versus 30 pmol/L, p < 0.01; angiotensin II: 114 versus 58 pmol/L, p < 0.05), demonstrating activation of classical RAS. The difference disappeared with analysis limited to patients not taking a RAS inhibitor (angiotensin I: 40 versus 31 pmol/L, p = 0.251; angiotensin II: 76 versus 99 pmol/L, p = 0.833). ALT-S in severe COVID-19 increased with time (days 1-6: 0.12; days 11-16: 0.22) and correlated with ACE2 concentration (r = 0.831). ACE-S was lower in severe versus non-severe COVID-19 (1.6 versus 2.6; p < 0.001), but ACE concentrations were similar between groups and correlated weakly with ACE-S (r = 0.232). ACE2 and ACE-S trajectories in severe COVID-19, however, did not differ between survivors and non-survivors. Overall RAS alteration in severe COVID-19 resembled severity of disease-matched patients with influenza. In mixed linear models, renin activity most strongly predicted angiotensin II and 1-7 levels. ACE2 also predicted angiotensin 1-7 levels and ALT-S. No single factor or the combined model, however, could fully explain ACE-S. ACE2 and ACE-S trajectories in severe COVID-19 did not differ between survivors and non-survivors. In conclusion, angiotensin II was elevated in severe COVID-19 but was markedly influenced by RAS inhibitors and driven by overall RAS activation. ACE-S was significantly lower with severe COVID-19 and did not correlate with ACE concentrations. A shift to the alt-RAS axis because of increased ACE2 could partially explain the relative reduction in angiotensin II levels.