1
|
Bertino G, Minuti M, Groselj A, Jamsek C, Silvestri B, Carpene S, Matteucci P, Riva G, Pecorari G, Mascherini M, Kjær Lønkvist C, Muir T, Kunte C, de Terlizzi F, Sersa G. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) in treatment of mucosal head and neck tumors. An international network for sharing practices on ECT (InspECT) study group report. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108473. [PMID: 38870873 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of electrochemotherapy (ECT) for the treatment of mucosal tumors in the head and neck. A total of 71 patients with 84 nodules of different histologies in the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx treated by ECT were evaluated. The data were collected from the InspECT database from 10 participating centers throughout Europe. Primary and recurrent/secondary tumors of different histologies were treated. The overall response rate was 65 %, with a 33 % complete response rate with limited side effects. The response rates of the primary and secondary tumors were not different. However, smaller tumors responded better than tumors larger than 3 cm in diameter. Furthermore, the tumors that were treated with curative intent responded significantly better than those treated with palliative intent. This study demonstrated the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of ECT in a larger cohort of patients with mucosal lesions in the head and neck region. Based on the available data, ECT can be used for the treatment of recurrent and, in some cases, primary mucosal tumors located in the oral cavity, larynx, and pharynx. A better response was obtained in patients with smaller primary tumors treated with curative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Bertino
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Marta Minuti
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ales Groselj
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| | - Crt Jamsek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| | - Barbara Silvestri
- Oncology and Haematology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Socio Sanitaria (AULSS) 3 Serenissima - Ospedale di Mirano, Venice, Italy.
| | - Silvia Carpene
- Otolaryngology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Socio Sanitaria (AULSS) 3 Serenissima - Ospedale di Mirano, Venice, Italy.
| | - Paolo Matteucci
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Hull University Teaching Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Hull, UK.
| | - Giuseppe Riva
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Otolaryngology Clinic, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - Giancarlo Pecorari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Otolaryngology Clinic, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - Matteo Mascherini
- Department of Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Polyclinic Hospital San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Camilla Kjær Lønkvist
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Tobian Muir
- Department of Plastic Surgery, South Tees NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK.
| | - Christian Kunte
- Department of Dermatosurgery and Dermatology, Artemed Fachklinik Munich, München, Germany.
| | | | - Gregor Sersa
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guigay J, Le Caer H, Ferrand FR, Geoffrois L, Saada-Bouzid E, Fayette J, Sire C, Cupissol D, Blot E, Guillet P, Pavillet J, Bozec L, Capitain O, Rolland F, Debourdeau P, Pointreau Y, Falandry C, Lopez S, Coutte A, Chatellier T, Dalloz P, Ortholan C, Michel C, Lacas B, Cheurfa N, Schwob D, Bourhis J, Mertens C, Aupérin A. Adapted EXTREME regimen in the first-line treatment of fit, older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (ELAN-FIT): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. THE LANCET. HEALTHY LONGEVITY 2024; 5:e392-e405. [PMID: 38759667 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(24)00048-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A standard treatment for fit, older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is yet to be established. In the previous EXTREME trial, few older patients were included. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of an adapted EXTREME regimen in fit, older patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. METHODS This single-arm, phase 2 study was done at 22 centres in France. Eligible patients were aged 70 years or older and assessed as not frail (fit) using the ELAN Geriatric Evaluation (EGE) and had recurrent or metastatic HNSCC in the first-line setting that was not eligible for local therapy (surgery or radiotherapy), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. The adapted EXTREME regimen consisted of six cycles of fluorouracil 4000 mg/m2 on days 1-4, carboplatin with an area under the curve of 5 on day 1, and cetuximab on days 1, 8, and 15 (400 mg/m2 on cycle 1-day 1, and 250 mg/m2 subsequently), all intravenously, with cycles starting every 21 days. In patients with disease control after two to six cycles, cetuximab 500 mg/m2 was continued once every 2 weeks as maintenance therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was systematically administered and erythropoietin was recommended during chemotherapy. The study was based on the two-stage Bryant and Day design, combining efficacy and toxicity endpoints. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate at week 12 after the start of treatment, assessed by central review (with an unacceptable rate of ≤15%). The primary toxicity endpoint was morbidity, defined as grade 4-5 adverse events, or cutaneous rash (grade ≥3) that required cetuximab to be discontinued, during the chemotherapy phase, or a decrease in functional autonomy (Activities of Daily Living score decrease ≥2 points from baseline) at 1 month after the end of chemotherapy (with an unacceptable morbidity rate of >40%). Analysis of the coprimary endpoints, and of safety in the chemotherapy phase, was based on the per-protocol population, defined as eligible patients who received at least one cycle of the adapted EXTREME regimen. Safety in the maintenance phase was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of cetuximab as maintenance therapy. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01864772, and is completed. FINDINGS Between Sept 27, 2013, and June 20, 2018, 85 patients were enrolled, of whom 78 were in the per-protocol population. 66 (85%) patients were male and 12 (15%) were female, and the median age was 75 years (IQR 72-79). The median number of chemotherapy cycles received was five (IQR 3-6). Objective response at week 12 was observed in 31 patients (40% [95% CI 30-51]) and morbidity events were observed in 24 patients (31% [22-42]). No fatal adverse events occurred. Four patients presented with a decrease in functional autonomy 1 month after the end of chemotherapy versus baseline. During chemotherapy, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were haematological events (leukopenia [22 patients; 28%], neutropenia [20; 26%], thrombocytopenia [15; 19%], and anaemia [12; 15%]), oral mucositis (14; 18%), fatigue (11; 14%), rash acneiform (ten; 13%), and hypomagnesaemia (nine; 12%). Among 44 patients who received cetuximab during the maintenance phase, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypomagnesaemia (six patients; 14%) and acneiform rash (six; 14%). INTERPRETATION The study met its primary objectives on objective response and morbidity, and showed overall survival to be as good as in younger patients treated with standard regimens, indicating that the adapted EXTREME regimen could be used in older patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC who are deemed fit with use of a geriatric evaluation tool adapted to patients with head and neck cancer, such as the EGE. FUNDING French programme PAIR-VADS 2011 (sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, the Fondation ARC, and the Ligue Contre le Cancer), Sandoz, GEFLUC, and GEMLUC. TRANSLATION For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joël Guigay
- Partnerships and Clinical Development-Early Assets, GORTEC, Tours, France.
| | - Hervé Le Caer
- Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Centre of Saint-Brieuc, Saint-Brieuc, France
| | | | - Lionel Geoffrois
- Medical Oncology Unit, Lorraine Cancerology Institute, Nancy, France
| | - Esma Saada-Bouzid
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Jérôme Fayette
- Medical Oncology Unit, Cancer Research Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Christian Sire
- Oncology-Radiotherapy Unit, Hospital Group South Bretagne, Lorient, France
| | - Didier Cupissol
- Medical Oncology Unit, Cancer Institute of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuel Blot
- Medical Oncology Unit, ELSAN Group, Private Hospital Océane, Vannes, France
| | - Pierre Guillet
- Medical Oncology Unit, Intercommunal Hospital Centre, La Seyne-sur-Mer, France
| | | | - Laurence Bozec
- Medical Oncology Unit, Curie Institute, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Olivier Capitain
- Medical Oncology Unit, West Cancerology Institute, Angers, France
| | - Frédéric Rolland
- Medical Oncology Unit, West Cancerology Institute, Saint Herblain, France
| | | | - Yoann Pointreau
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Inter-regional Cancerology Institute, Jean Bernard Center, Le Mans, France; Victor Hugo Private Clinic, Sarthe Cancer Center, Le Mans, France
| | - Claire Falandry
- Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Centre of South Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Stéphane Lopez
- Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Centre of Annecy Genevois, Pringy, France
| | - Alexandre Coutte
- Medical Oncology Unit, South Hospital Centre of Amiens, Amiens, France
| | - Thierry Chatellier
- Medical Oncology Unit, Mutualist Clinic of the Estuary, Saint Nazaire, France
| | - Pierre Dalloz
- Medical Oncology Unit, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Cécile Ortholan
- Oncology-Radiotherapy Unit, Hospital Centre Princesse-Grace, Monaco
| | - Cécile Michel
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, FHU OncoAge, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Benjamin Lacas
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Office, Gustave-Roussy, Inserm U1018 Oncostat, Labelled Ligue Contre le Cancer, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Nadir Cheurfa
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Office, Gustave-Roussy, Inserm U1018 Oncostat, Labelled Ligue Contre le Cancer, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Dominique Schwob
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Office, Gustave-Roussy, Inserm U1018 Oncostat, Labelled Ligue Contre le Cancer, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital Center of Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Cécile Mertens
- Oncogeriatrics Unit, Bergonié Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anne Aupérin
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Office, Gustave-Roussy, Inserm U1018 Oncostat, Labelled Ligue Contre le Cancer, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guigay J, Ortholan C, Vansteene D, Cupissol D, Even C, Kaminsky MC, Sire C, Blot E, Debourdeau P, Bozec L, Saada-Bouzid E, Fayette J, Dalloz P, Pointreau Y, Caer HL, Falandry C, Digue L, Braccini A, Lopez S, Guillet P, Michel C, Cheurfa N, Schwob D, Bourhis J, Mertens C, Aupérin A. Cetuximab versus methotrexate in first-line treatment of older, frail patients with inoperable recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (ELAN UNFIT): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. THE LANCET. HEALTHY LONGEVITY 2024; 5:e182-e193. [PMID: 38432247 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(23)00284-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND At present, there is no established standard treatment for frail older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of cetuximab to those of methotrexate (the reference regimen) in this population. METHODS This randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial was done at 20 hospitals in France. Patients aged 70 years or older, assessed as frail by the ELAN Geriatric Evaluation, with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the first-line setting and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive cetuximab 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 2 weeks or methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously every week, with minimisation by ECOG performance status, type of disease evolution, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, serum albumin concentration, and geriatrician consultation. To avoid deterministic minimisation and assure allocation concealment, patients were allocated with a probability of 0·80 to the treatment that most reduced the imbalance. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival (defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression, death, discontinuation of treatment, or loss of 2 or more points on the Activities in Daily Living scale, whichever occurred first) and was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. 151 failures expected out of 164 patients were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·625 with 0·05 alpha error, with 80% power. A futility interim analysis was planned when approximately 80 failures were observed, based on failure-free survival. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01884623) and was stopped for futility after the interim analysis. FINDINGS Between Nov 7, 2013, and April 23, 2018, 82 patients were enrolled (41 to the cetuximab group and 41 to the methotrexate group); 60 (73%) were male, 37 (45%) were aged 80 years or older, 35 (43%) had an ECOG performance status of 2, and 36 (44%) had metastatic disease. Enrolment was stopped for futility at the interim analysis. At the final analysis, median follow-up was 43·3 months (IQR 30·8-52·1). At data cutoff, all 82 patients had failure; failure-free survival did not differ significantly between the groups (median 1·4 months [95% CI 1·0-2·1] in the cetuximab group vs 1·9 months [1·1-2·6] in the methotrexate group; adjusted HR 1·03 [95% CI 0·66-1·61], p=0·89). The frequency of patients who had grade 3 or worse adverse events was 63% (26 of 41) in the cetuximab group and 73% (30 of 41) in the methotrexate group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the cetuximab group were fatigue (four [10%] of 41 patients), lung infection (four [10%]), and rash acneiform (four [10%]), and those in the methotrexate group were fatigue (nine [22%] of 41), increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (seven [17%]), natraemia disorder (four [10%]), anaemia (four [10%]), leukopenia (four [10%]), and neutropenia (four [10%]). The frequency of patients who had serious adverse events was 44% (18 of 41) in the cetuximab group and 39% (16 of 41) in the methotrexate group. Four patients presented with a fatal adverse event in the cetuximab group (sepsis, decreased level of consciousness, pulmonary oedema, and death of unknown cause) as did two patients in the methotrexate group (dyspnoea and death of unknown cause). INTERPRETATION The study showed no improvement in failure-free survival with cetuximab versus methotrexate. Patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 did not benefit from these systemic therapies. New treatment options including immunotherapy should be explored in frail older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, after an initial geriatric evaluation, such as the ELAN Geriatric Evaluation. FUNDING French programme PAIR-VADS 2011 (sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, the Fondation ARC and the Ligue Contre le Cancer), GEMLUC, GEFLUC, and Merck Santé. TRANSLATION For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joël Guigay
- Partnerships and Clinical Development - Early Assets, GORTEC, Tours, France.
| | - Cécile Ortholan
- Oncology-Radiotherapy Unit, Hospital Centre Princesse-Grace, Monaco
| | - Damien Vansteene
- Medical Oncology Unit, West Cancerology Institute, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Didier Cupissol
- Medical Oncology Unit, Cancer Institute of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Caroline Even
- Medical Oncology Unit, Gustave-Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Christian Sire
- Oncology-Radiotherapy Unit, Hospital Group South Bretagne, Lorient, France
| | - Emmanuel Blot
- Medical Oncology Unit, ELSAN Group, Private Hospital Océane, Vannes, France
| | | | - Laurence Bozec
- Medical Oncology Unit, Curie Institute, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Esma Saada-Bouzid
- Medical Oncology and Research Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Jérôme Fayette
- Medical Oncology Unit, Cancer Research Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre Dalloz
- Medical Oncology Unit, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Yoann Pointreau
- Radiation Oncology Unit, ILC (Inter-regional Cancerology Institute) - Jean Bernard Center & Victor Hugo Private Clinic, Sarthe Cancer Center, Le Mans, France
| | - Hervé Le Caer
- Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Centre of Saint-Brieuc, Saint-Brieuc, France
| | - Claire Falandry
- Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Centre of South Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Laurence Digue
- Medical Oncology Unit, Saint André Universitary Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Antoine Braccini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France
| | - Stéphane Lopez
- Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Centre of Annecy Genevois, Pringy, France
| | - Pierre Guillet
- Medical Oncology Unit, Intercommunal Hospital Centre, La Seyne sur Mer, France
| | - Cécile Michel
- Medical Oncology and Research Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Nadir Cheurfa
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, Gustave Roussy, Inserm U1018 Oncostat, Labelled Ligue Contre le Cancer, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Dominique Schwob
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, Gustave Roussy, Inserm U1018 Oncostat, Labelled Ligue Contre le Cancer, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Radiotherapy Unit, Universitary Hospital Center of Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Cécile Mertens
- Oncogeriatrics Unit, Bergonié Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anne Aupérin
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, Gustave Roussy, Inserm U1018 Oncostat, Labelled Ligue Contre le Cancer, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tonneau M, Nebbache R, Larnaudie A, Thureau S, Pointreau Y, Blanchard P, Thariat J. Management of head and neck carcinomas with synchronous or metachronous oligometastatic disease: Role of locoregional radiotherapy and metastasis-directed radiotherapy. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:83-92. [PMID: 37620212 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Head and neck carcinomas are initially metastatic in about 15% of cases. Radiotherapy is a cornerstone in the multimodal strategy at the locoregional phase. In patients with head and neck cancer, often heavily pretreated and with comorbidities, who relapse locoregionally or at distant sites, radiotherapy has also become increasingly important at the metastatic phase. Data on the optimal sequence of systemic treatments and metastasis-directed treatments including stereotactic irradiation are still lacking. Several randomized head and neck trials have been initiated that should provide important answers, including one recent GORTEC trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Tonneau
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, CRLCC Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, Lille, France
| | - R Nebbache
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - A Larnaudie
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - S Thureau
- Département de radiothérapie et de physique médicale, centre Henri-Becquerel, Rouen, France; Unité QuantIF Litis EA 4108, université de Rouen, Rouen, France; Département d'imagerie, centre Henri-Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Y Pointreau
- Institut inter-régional de cancérologie (ILC), centre Jean-Bernard, centre de cancérologie de la Sarthe (CCS), 64, rue de Degré, 72000 Le Mans, France
| | - P Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave-Roussy, université Paris Saclay, Inserm U1018 Oncostat, Villejuif, France
| | - J Thariat
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France; Laboratoire de physique corpusculaire/IN2P3-CNRS UMR 6534, Unicaen-université de Normandie, 14000 Caen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marín-Jiménez JA, Oliva M, Peinado Martín P, Cabezas-Camarero S, Plana Serrahima M, Vázquez Masedo G, Lozano Borbalas A, Cabrera Martín MN, Esteve A, Iglesias Moreno MC, Vilajosana Altamis E, Arribas Hortigüela L, Taberna Sanz M, Pérez-Segura P, Mesía R. Paclitaxel Plus Cetuximab as Induction Chemotherapy for Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Unfit for Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:953020. [PMID: 35936723 PMCID: PMC9355730 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.953020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by definitive treatment is an accepted non-surgical approach for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). However, ICT remains a challenge for cisplatin-unfit patients. We evaluated paclitaxel and cetuximab (P-C) as ICT in a cohort of LA-HNSCC patients unfit for cisplatin. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed LA-HNSCC considered unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy (age >70 and/or ECOG≥2 and/or comorbidities) treated with weekly P-C followed by definitive radiotherapy and cetuximab (RT-C) between 2010 and 2017. Toxicity and objective response rate (ORR) to ICT and RT-C were collected. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine baseline predictors of OS and PFS. Results A total of 57 patients were included. Grade 3–4 toxicity rate to ICT was 54.4%, and there was a death deemed treatment-related (G5). P-C achieved an ORR of 66.7%, including 12.3% of complete responses (CR). After P-C, 45 patients (78.9%) continued with concomitant RT-C. Twenty-six patients (45.6%) achieved a CR after definitive treatment. With a median follow-up of 21.7 months (range 1.2–94.6), median OS and PFS were 22.9 months and 10.7 months, respectively. The estimated 2-year OS and PFS rates were 48.9% and 33.7%, respectively. Disease stage had a negative impact on OS (stage IVb vs. III–IVa: HR = 2.55 [1.08–6.04], p = 0.03), with a trend towards worse PFS (HR = 1.92 [0.91–4.05], p = 0.09). Primary tumor in the larynx was associated with improved PFS but not OS (HR = 0.45 [0.22–0.92], p = 0.03, and HR = 0.69 [0.32–1.54], p = 0.37, respectively). Conclusion P-C was a well-tolerated and active ICT regimen in this cohort of LA-HNSCC patients unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. P-C might represent a valid ICT option for unfit patients and may aid patient selection for definitive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan A. Marín-Jiménez
- Head and Neck Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO – L’Hospitalet de Llobregat), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marc Oliva
- Head and Neck Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO – L’Hospitalet de Llobregat), Barcelona, Spain
- Oncobell Program - Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge), Barcelona, Spain
- *Correspondence: Marc Oliva, ; Ricard Mesía,
| | - Paloma Peinado Martín
- Head and Neck Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Clínica San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Santiago Cabezas-Camarero
- Head and Neck Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Clínica San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Plana Serrahima
- Head and Neck Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO – L’Hospitalet de Llobregat), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gonzalo Vázquez Masedo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Clínica San Carlos (IdISCC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Alicia Lozano Borbalas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO – L’Hospitalet de Llobregat), Barcelona, Spain
| | - María N. Cabrera Martín
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos - IdISCC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna Esteve
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-Badalona), B-ARGO group, Institut d’Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Barcelona, Spain
- Oncology Data Analytics Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO – L’Hospitalet de Llobregat) - Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | - María C. Iglesias Moreno
- Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos e- IdISCC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther Vilajosana Altamis
- Head and Neck Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO – L’Hospitalet de Llobregat), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lorena Arribas Hortigüela
- Clinical Nutrition Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO – L’Hospitalet de Llobregat), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miren Taberna Sanz
- Head and Neck Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO – L’Hospitalet de Llobregat), Barcelona, Spain
- Oncobell Program - Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Pérez-Segura
- Head and Neck Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Clínica San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricard Mesía
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-Badalona), B-ARGO group, Institut d’Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Barcelona, Spain
- *Correspondence: Marc Oliva, ; Ricard Mesía,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sprave T, Verma V, Fabian A, Rühle A, Baltas D, Grosu AL, Nicolay NH. Cost effectiveness and health-related quality of life of chemoradiotherapy versus radiation therapy alone in elderly head and neck cancer patients. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:1008-1015. [PMID: 35833963 PMCID: PMC9581829 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01975-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Radiotherapy (RT) constitutes a mainstay in the treatment of elderly patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), but use of simultaneous chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains controversial. We have conducted a prospective analysis based on real-world patient data to examine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cost effectiveness (CE) of CRT vs. RT in elderly HNC patients. Methods Eligible participants ≥ 65 years treated in a large tertiary cancer center between July 2019 and February 2020 who completed the validated EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (health state index [HI] and visual analog scale [VAS]) before and after RT were included. CE referred to direct medical costs, including diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based billings for inpatients and uniform assessment standard (EBM)-based costs for outpatients. The primary endpoint was cost (euros [€]) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Costs and QALYs were not discounted for short overall survival (OS). Results Baseline HRQoL was 0.878 (±0.11) in the CRT group and 0.857 (±0.17) in the RT group. Upon completion of therapy, HRQoL amounted to 0.849 (±0.14) in the CRT and 0.850 (±0.13) in the RT group. The mean treatment-related cost in the CRT cohort was €22,180.17 (±8325.26) vs. €18,027.87 (±26,022.48) in the RT group. The corresponding QALYs amounted to 2.62 in the CRT and 1.91 in the RT groups. The ICER was €5848.31. Conclusion This is the first analysis from the German health care system demonstrating that the addition of chemotherapy to RT for selected elderly HNC patients is cost effective and not associated with a significant HRQoL decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fuereder T. Optimizing the prescription doses and tolerability of systemic therapy in head and neck cancer patients. Curr Opin Oncol 2022; 34:204-211. [PMID: 35266908 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck accounts for 330 000 deaths and 650 000 cases worldwide annually. Systemic therapy is an essential pillar of multimodal therapy despite being accompanied with substantial toxicity. This article reviews the latest advances in systemic therapy for the treatment of locoregionally advanced and reccurent/metastatic head and neck cancer from a tolerability perspective. RECENT FINDINGS Multiple recent attempts have been made to optimize tolerability (and efficacy) of systemic therapy utilizing new regimens, modified prescription doses, drugs such as immunotherapies or genotyping to tailor the systemic therapy to the individual patient. SUMMARY Although treatment benefit has to be weighed against potential toxicity, it is reasonable to anticipate potential side effects of systemic therapies. In a vulnerable elderly or Asian patient population upfront dose modifications of cytotoxic chemotherapies might be reasonable. Special attention should be laid on the patient's nutritional status and early intervention recommended. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genotyping can predict 5-fluorouracil toxicity and identify patients for whom alternative regimens are more suitable. As for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, despite being well tolerated, the identification of biomarkers to predict reduced tolerability or severe toxicity would be highly desirable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorsten Fuereder
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lübbers K, Pavlychenko M, Wald T, Wiegand S, Dietz A, Zebralla V, Wichmann G. Choosing the Right Treatment Option for the Right R/M HNSCC Patient: Should We Adhere to PFE for First-Line Therapy? Front Oncol 2021; 11:715297. [PMID: 34354955 PMCID: PMC8329655 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.715297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The landmark EXTREME trial established cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and cetuximab (PFE) as first-line chemotherapy (1L-ChT) for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). We were interested in outcome differences of R/M HNSCC in 1L-ChT and factors influencing outcome in certain subgroups, especially patients receiving PFE, and the value of PFE compared to other 1L-ChT regimens to provide real world evidence (RWE). Methods For this retrospective monocentric study, 124 R/M HNSCC patients without curative surgical or radiotherapy options receiving at least one cycle of 1L-ChT were eligible. We analyzed their outcome using Kaplan-Meier plot and Cox regression to identify predictors for prolonged survival. Results Subgroups benefiting significantly from PFE were patients suffering from an index HNSCC outside the oropharynx. The PFE regimen proved to be superior to all other 1L-ChT regimens in clinical routine. Significant outcome differences between PFE treatment within or outside controlled trials were not seen. Conclusion This retrospective analysis provides RWE for factors linked to improved outcome. Subgroup analyses highlight the lasting value of PFE among the growing spectrum of 1L-ChT. Importantly, fit smokers with high level alcohol consumption benefit from PFE; considering the patient's lifestyle factors, PFE should not be ignored in decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Lübbers
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Mykola Pavlychenko
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Theresa Wald
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Susanne Wiegand
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Dietz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Veit Zebralla
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Gunnar Wichmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sequential chemotherapy regimen of induction with panitumumab and paclitaxel followed by radiotherapy and panitumumab in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer unfit for platinum derivatives. The phase II, PANTERA/TTCC-2010-06 study. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:1666-1677. [PMID: 33876416 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02567-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sequential treatment of Panitumumab (Pb) plus Paclitaxel (Px) as induction treatment (IT) followed by concurrent bioradiotherapy (Bio-RT) with Pb may be an alternative for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN) in patients ineligible for high-dose cisplatin therapy. METHODS Phase II, single-arm, multicentre study, with two-stage design, in patients ≥ 18 years with stage III-IVa-b LA-SCCHN unfit for platinum. Patients received Px + Pb (9 weeks) as IT followed by Bio-RT + Pb. Primary endpoint: overall response rate (ORR) after IT, defined as: more than 70% of patients achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to IT. Secondary end-points: progression-free survival, organ preservation rate, safety profile. RESULTS Study ended prematurely (51 patients) due to slow recruitment. ORR: 66.7% (95% CI: 53.7-79.6), 8 (15.7%) CR and 26 (51.0%) PR. 39 patients (76%) completed radiotherapy (RT). Pb and/or Px-related adverse events (AEs) grade 3-4: 56.9% during IT and 63.4% during the concomitant phase, of which most common were skin toxicity (33.3%). Five deaths occurred during treatment, two of them (3.9%) were Pb and/or Px-related. CONCLUSIONS Although underpowered, ORR was higher than the pre-specified boundary for considering the treatment active. Although Px + Pb as IT provides some benefit, the safety profile is worse than expected. To consider Pb + Px as IT as an alternative for platinum-unsuitable LA-SCCHN, further research/investigation would be needed.
Collapse
|
10
|
Stromberger C, Yedikat B, Coordes A, Tinhofer I, Kalinauskaite G, Budach V, Zschaeck S, Raguse JD, Kofla G, Heiland M, Stsefanenka A, Beck-Broichsitter B, Dommerich S, Senger C, Beck M. Prognostic Factors Predict Oncological Outcome in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Chemoradiation Treatment. Front Oncol 2021; 10:566318. [PMID: 33708616 PMCID: PMC7942196 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.566318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Older patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) represent a challenging group, as frailty and comorbidities need to be considered. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of curative and palliative (chemo) radiation ([C]RT) with regard to basic geriatric screening in older patients. Methods This study included HNC patients aged ≥70 years who were treated with curative or palliative (C)RT. Clinicopathological data including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and treatment data were analyzed as predictors of overall survival (OS). Results A total of 271 patients (median age, 74 years) were enrolled. The majority had UICC stage III/IV (90%) and underwent curative treatment (85.2%). A total of 144 (53.1%) patients received definitive and 87 (32.1%) had adjuvant (C)RT. Overall, 40 patients (14.8%) received palliative (C)RT. Median follow-up duration (curative setting) was 87 months, and the 2- and 5-year OS rates were 57.8 and 35.9%, respectively. Median OS was significantly different for age ≤75 vs. >75 years, CCI <6 vs. ≥6, KPS ≥70 vs. <70%, Tx/T1/T2 vs. T3/T4, and adjuvant vs. definitive (C)RT, respectively. Age 70–75 years (p = 0.004), fewer comorbidities when CCI < 6 (p = 0.014), good KPS ≥ 70% (p = 0.001), and adjuvant (C)RT (p = 0.008) independently predicted longer survival. Palliative RT resulted in a median OS of 4 months. Conclusion Older age, lower KPS, higher CCI, and definitive (C)RT are indicators of worse survival in older patients with HNC treated curatively. Without a comprehensive geriatric assessment in patients aged >75 years, the KPS and CCI can be useful tools to account for “fitness, vulnerability or frailty” to help in treatment decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Berna Yedikat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Coordes
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Tinhofer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan-Dirk Raguse
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Grzegorz Kofla
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aksana Stsefanenka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Dommerich
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
D'Andréa G, Scheller B, Gal J, Chamorey E, Château Y, Dassonville O, Poissonnet G, Culié D, Koulmann PH, Hechema R, Demard F, Elaldi R, Bozec A. How to select candidates for microvascular head and neck reconstruction in the elderly? Predictive factors of postoperative outcomes. Surg Oncol 2020; 34:168-173. [PMID: 32891324 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The proportion of elderly patients with head and neck cancer is increasing. However, predictive factors of postoperative outcomes are insufficiently explored in this population. In this study, we aimed to determine predictive factors of postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing head and neck free-flap reconstructive surgery in order to determine criteria on which patient selection could be based. METHODS All patients aged 65 years or over who underwent head and neck free-flap reconstructive surgery at our institution, between 2000 and 2016, were included in this retrospective study. Predictive factors of postoperative outcomes were investigated in uni- and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Two-hundred patients were included in the study. Older age (>70, >75 or > 80 yrs) had no significant impact on postoperative outcomes. Free flap failure local and general complications rates were 11%, 34% and 43%, respectively. Oromandibular reconstruction (p = 0.04) was significantly associated with free flap failure and salvage surgery (p = 0.04) with local complications. A high comorbidity level (Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥ 4; p = 0.02) was associated with a higher risk of general complications. A G8 (Geriatric 8 questionnaire) score < 15 (p = 0.004), a high comorbidity level (Kaplan-Feinstein Index score ≥ 2; p = 0.04) and oromandibular reconstruction (p = 0.04) were associated with poor swallowing function at 6 months. CONCLUSION Head and neck free flap reconstruction should be offered to fit (G8 score ≥ 15) elderly patients without severe comorbidities (KFI < 2 or CCI < 4), particularly when oral/pharyngeal soft-tissue reconstruction is planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grégoire D'Andréa
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Boris Scheller
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- Department of Statistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Emmanuel Chamorey
- Department of Statistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Yann Château
- Department of Statistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Olivier Dassonville
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Gilles Poissonnet
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Dorian Culié
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Pierre-Henri Koulmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Raphaël Hechema
- Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - François Demard
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Roxanne Elaldi
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Alexandre Bozec
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jeske SS, Schuler PJ, Doescher J, Theodoraki MN, Laban S, Brunner C, Hoffmann TK, Wigand MC. Age-related changes in T lymphocytes of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. IMMUNITY & AGEING 2020; 17:3. [PMID: 32082401 PMCID: PMC7017629 DOI: 10.1186/s12979-020-0174-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The number of aging cancer patients has increased continuously and will do so further in the future. The immune system of elderly people experiences critical changes over the time. Therefore, tumor-induced changes in the immune system are believed to differ in young and elderly cancer patients as well. Methods The effect of aging on the immune system was measured in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) of healthy volunteers (n = 48, 21–84 yrs.) divided into three different age groups. Seventy years was set as a cut-off for defining subjects as elderly. Results were compared to two groups of adult cancer patients, which donated PBL and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL): young cancer patients (40–69 yrs.; blood: n = 13; TIL: n = 17) and elderly cancer patients (70–90 yrs.; blood: n = 20; TIL: n = 15) with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Frequencies and phenotypes of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as well as regulatory T cells (Treg) were assessed by flow cytometry. Results We observed lower frequencies of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells during aging in both groups. Frequencies of tumor infiltrating regulatory T cells were significantly higher than in the peripheral blood but showed a significant decline in older tumor patients. With increasing age, expression of immunosuppressive CD73 and CCR7 was lower and expression of PD1 elevated on peripheral T cells in healthy volunteers and tumor patients. Conclusion Immunosenescence takes place in healthy donors and cancer patients. Our results suggest that in elderly tumor patients, the immune system is impaired and the tumor-induced immune escape is less pronounced. The increased expression of PD1 implies the potential for effective immunotherapies in elderly, as treatment with checkpoint inhibitors could be more beneficial for elderly HNSCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S S Jeske
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075 Ulm, Germany
| | - P J Schuler
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075 Ulm, Germany
| | - J Doescher
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075 Ulm, Germany
| | - M N Theodoraki
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075 Ulm, Germany
| | - S Laban
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075 Ulm, Germany
| | - C Brunner
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075 Ulm, Germany
| | - T K Hoffmann
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075 Ulm, Germany
| | - M C Wigand
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075 Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hofman P, Ayache N, Barbry P, Barlaud M, Bel A, Blancou P, Checler F, Chevillard S, Cristofari G, Demory M, Esnault V, Falandry C, Gilson E, Guérin O, Glaichenhaus N, Guigay J, Ilié M, Mari B, Marquette CH, Paquis-Flucklinger V, Prate F, Saintigny P, Seitz-Polsky B, Skhiri T, Van Obberghen-Schilling E, Van Obberghen E, Yvan-Charvet L. The OncoAge Consortium: Linking Aging and Oncology from Bench to Bedside and Back Again. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:E250. [PMID: 30795607 PMCID: PMC6406685 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11020250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
It is generally accepted that carcinogenesis and aging are two biological processes, which are known to be associated. Notably, the frequency of certain cancers (including lung cancer), increases significantly with the age of patients and there is now a wealth of data showing that multiple mechanisms leading to malignant transformation and to aging are interconnected, defining the so-called common biology of aging and cancer. OncoAge, a consortium launched in 2015, brings together the multidisciplinary expertise of leading public hospital services and academic laboratories to foster the transfer of scientific knowledge rapidly acquired in the fields of cancer biology and aging into innovative medical practice and silver economy development. This is achieved through the development of shared technical platforms (for research on genome stability, (epi)genetics, biobanking, immunology, metabolism, and artificial intelligence), clinical research projects, clinical trials, and education. OncoAge focuses mainly on two pilot pathologies, which benefit from the expertise of several members, namely lung and head and neck cancers. This review outlines the broad strategic directions and key advances of OncoAge and summarizes some of the issues faced by this consortium, as well as the short- and long-term perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Hofman
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology/Biobank 0033-00025, CHU Nice, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06001 Nice, France.
- Inserm U1081, CNRS UMR7284, Institut de Recherche sur le Cancer et le Vieillissement (IRCAN), FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06107 Nice, France.
| | - Nicholas Ayache
- Epione Team, Inria, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06902 Sophia Antipolis, France.
| | - Pascal Barbry
- CNRS UMR7275, Institut de Pharmacologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06560 Valbonne, France.
| | - Michel Barlaud
- i3S Sophia Antipolis, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
| | - Audrey Bel
- Centre d'Innovation et d'Usages en Santé (CIUS), FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.
| | - Philippe Blancou
- CNRS UMR7275, Institut de Pharmacologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06560 Valbonne, France.
| | - Frédéric Checler
- CNRS UMR7275, Institut de Pharmacologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06560 Valbonne, France.
| | - Sylvie Chevillard
- Laboratoire de Cancérologie Expérimentale, Institut François Jacob, CEA Direction de la Recherche Fondamentale, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
| | - Gael Cristofari
- Inserm U1081, CNRS UMR7284, Institut de Recherche sur le Cancer et le Vieillissement (IRCAN), FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06107 Nice, France.
| | - Mathilde Demory
- Ville de Nice, Mairie de Nice, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06364 Nice, France.
| | - Vincent Esnault
- Nephrology Department, CHU Nice, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06001 Nice, France.
| | - Claire Falandry
- Geriatric Unit, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, FHU OncoAge, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69310 Pierre-Benite, France.
- Laboratoire CarMeN, Inserm U1060, INRA U139, INSA Lyon, Ecole de Médecine Charles Mérieux, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69921 Oullins, France.
| | - Eric Gilson
- Inserm U1081, CNRS UMR7284, Institut de Recherche sur le Cancer et le Vieillissement (IRCAN), FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06107 Nice, France.
| | - Olivier Guérin
- Geriatric Coordination Unit for Geriatric Oncology (UCOG) PACA Est, CHU Nice, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.
| | - Nicolas Glaichenhaus
- CNRS UMR7275, Institut de Pharmacologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06560 Valbonne, France.
| | - Joel Guigay
- Oncology Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, FHU OncoAge, Université Côté d'Azur, 06189 Nice, France.
| | - Marius Ilié
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology/Biobank 0033-00025, CHU Nice, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06001 Nice, France.
- Inserm U1081, CNRS UMR7284, Institut de Recherche sur le Cancer et le Vieillissement (IRCAN), FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06107 Nice, France.
| | - Bernard Mari
- CNRS UMR7275, Institut de Pharmacologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06560 Valbonne, France.
| | - Charles-Hugo Marquette
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, CHU Nice, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.
| | - Véronique Paquis-Flucklinger
- Inserm U1081, CNRS UMR7284, Institut de Recherche sur le Cancer et le Vieillissement (IRCAN), FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06107 Nice, France.
| | - Frédéric Prate
- Geriatric Coordination Unit for Geriatric Oncology (UCOG) PACA Est, CHU Nice, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.
| | - Pierre Saintigny
- Département de Médecine, INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Centre de recherche en cancérologie de Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, FHU OncoAge, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France.
| | - Barbara Seitz-Polsky
- CNRS UMR7275, Institut de Pharmacologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06560 Valbonne, France.
- Laboratory of Immunology, CHU Nice, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06200 Nice, France.
| | - Taycir Skhiri
- Centre d'Innovation et d'Usages en Santé (CIUS), FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.
| | | | | | - Laurent Yvan-Charvet
- Inserm U1065, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire (C3M), FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, 06200 Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|