Targeting HER2 heterogeneity in early-stage breast cancer

Survival analysis of palliative radiotherapy in patients with HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer

Background

Whether radiotherapy can improve the long-term survival of HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer remains unclear. We launched this study to explore the effect of HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer patients through anti-HER-2 targeted therapy + radiotherapy.

Methods

488 HER-2 + metastatic breast cancer patients who received anti-HER2 targeted ± local radiotherapy from March 2006 to September 2021 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a radiotherapy group (n=207) and a non-radiotherapy group (n=281) based on whether they received radiotherapy or not. 1: 1 propensity matching analysis was used to determine two groups of patients with similar baselines.

Results

Before matching, the radiotherapy group (n=207) had a median overall survival (mOS) of 51.7 months (48.8-63.8), which was superior to the non-radiotherapy group's (n=281) mOS of 33.9 months (27.9-39.9) (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the radiotherapy group exhibited better 1-year (94.6% vs 83.9%), 3-year (70.8% vs 45.5%), and 5-year (43.3% vs 25.0%) survival rates compared to the control group. Propensity score matching analysis identified 135 pairs of baseline-matched patients. In the matched groups, the mOS was 57.2 (44.5-69.8) months in the radiotherapy group (n=135) and 34.1 (27.5-40.6) months in the non-radiotherapy group (n=135), showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001). Additionally, the radiotherapy group demonstrated 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 93.2%, 71.5%, and 46.9%, respectively, while those in the non-radiotherapy group were 89.4%, 45.8%, and 22.2%, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that the presence of brain metastasis, liver metastasis, and radiotherapy were identified as independent predictive factors significantly associated with OS.

Conclusion

In patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer, radiotherapy was associated with better survival benefits compared to those who did not receive radiotherapy.

Nanomedicine-Based Drug-Targeting in Breast Cancer: Pharmacokinetics, Clinical Progress, and Challenges

Breast cancer (BC) is a malignant neoplasm that begins in the breast tissue. After skin cancer, BC is the second most common type of cancer in women. At the end of 2040, the number of newly diagnosed BC cases is projected to increase by over 40%, reaching approximately 3 million worldwide annually. The hormonal and chemotherapeutic approaches based on conventional formulations have inappropriate therapeutic effects and suboptimal pharmacokinetic responses with nonspecific targeting actions. To overcome such issues, the use of nanomedicines, including liposomes, nanoparticles, micelles, hybrid nanoparticles, etc., has gained wider attention in the treatment of BC. Smaller dimensional nanomedicine (especially 50-200 nm) exhibited improved in vivo effectiveness, such as better tissue penetration and more effective tumor suppression through enhanced retention and permeation, as well as active targeting of the drug. Additionally, nanotechnology, which further extended and developed theranostic nanomedicine by incorporating diagnostic and imaging agents in one platform, has been applied to BC. Furthermore, hybrid and theranostic nanomedicine has also been explored for gene delivery as anticancer therapeutics in BC. Moreover, the nanocarriers' size, shape, surface charge, chemical compositions, and surface area play an important role in the nanocarriers' stability, cellular absorption, cytotoxicity, cellular uptake, and toxicity. Additionally, nanomedicine clinical translation for managing BC remains a slow process. However, a few cases are being used clinically, and their progress with the current challenges is addressed in this Review. Therefore, this Review extensively discusses recent advancements in nanomedicine and its clinical challenges in BC.

Humanized single-domain antibody targeting HER2 enhances function of chimeric antigen receptor T cells

Introduction

Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) can redirect T cells against antigen-expressing tumors, and each component plays an important role in the function and anti-tumor efficacy. It has been reported that using human sequences or a low affinity of CAR single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) in the CAR binding domains is a potential way to enhance the function of CAR-T cells. However, it remains largely unknown how a lower affinity of CARs using humanized scFvs affects the function of CAR-T cells until recently.

Methods

We used different humanized anti-HER2 antibodies as the extracellular domain of CARs and further constructed a series of the CAR-T cells with different affinity.

Results

We have observed that moderately reducing the affinity of CARs (light chain variable domain (VL)-based CAR-T) could maintain the anti-tumor efficacy, and improved the safety of CAR therapy both in vitro and in vivo compared with high-affinity CAR-T cells. Moreover, T cells expressing the VL domain only antibody exhibited long-lasting tumor elimination capability after multiple challenges in vitro, longer persistence and lower cytokine levels in vivo.

Discussion

Our findings provide an alternative option for CAR-T optimization with the potential to widen the use of CAR T cells.

Differential response of HER2-positive breast cancer to anti-HER2 therapy based on HER2 protein expression level

BACKGROUND

Increasing data indicate that HER2-positive (HER2 + ) breast cancer (BC) subtypes exhibit differential responses to targeted anti-HER2 therapy. This study aims to investigate these differences and the potential underlying molecular mechanisms.

METHODS

A large cohort of BC patients (n = 7390) was utilised. The clinicopathological characteristics and differential gene expression (DGE) of HER2+ immunohistochemical (IHC) subtypes, specifically HER2 IHC 3+ and IHC 2 + /Amplified, were assessed and correlated with pathological complete response (pCR) and survival in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, respectively. The role of oestrogen receptor (ER) status was also investigated.

RESULTS

Compared to HER2 IHC 3+ tumours, BC patients with IHC 2 + /Amplified showed a significantly lower pCR rate (22% versus 57%, P < 0.001), shorter survival regardless of HER2 gene copy number, were less classified as HER2 enriched, and enriched for trastuzumab resistance and ER signalling pathway genes. ER positivity significantly decreased response to anti-HER2 therapy in IHC 2 + /Amplified, but not in IHC 3 + BC patients.

CONCLUSION

In HER2 + BC, overexpression of HER2 protein is the driver of the oncogenic pathway, and it is the main predictor of response to anti-HER2 therapy. ER signalling pathways are more dominant in BC with equivocal HER2 expression. personalised anti-HER2 therapy based on IHC classes should be considered.

Clinical and translational relevance of intratumor heterogeneity

Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) is a driver of tumor evolution and a main cause of therapeutic resistance. Despite its importance, measures of ITH are still not incorporated into clinical practice. Consequently, standard treatment is frequently ineffective for patients with heterogeneous tumors as changes to treatment regimens are made only after recurrence and disease progression. More effective combination therapies require a mechanistic understanding of ITH and ways to assess it in clinical samples. The growth of technologies enabling the spatially intact analysis of tumors at the single-cell level and the development of sophisticated preclinical models give us hope that ITH will not simply be used as a predictor of a poor outcome but will guide treatment decisions from diagnosis through treatment.

Unlocking the Resistance to Anti-HER2 Treatments in Breast Cancer: The Issue of HER2 Spatial Distribution

Approximately 15% of breast cancers are classified as HER2-positive, with an amplification of the ERBB2 gene and/or an overexpression of the HER2 protein. Up to 30% of HER2-positive breast cancers shows heterogeneity in HER2 expression and different patterns of spatial distribution, i.e., the variability in the distribution and expression of the HER2 protein within a single tumour. Spatial heterogeneity may potentially affect treatment, response, assessment of HER2 status and consequently, may impact on the best treatment strategy. Understanding this feature can help clinicians to predict response to HER2-targeted therapies and patient outcomes, and to fine tune treatment decisions. This review summarizes the available evidence on HER2 heterogeneity and spatial distribution and how this may affect current available treatment choices, exploring possible opportunities for overcoming this issue, such as novel pharmacological agents, belonging to the group of antibody-drug conjugates.

The Great Immune Escape: Understanding the Divergent Immune Response in Breast Cancer Subtypes

Breast cancer, the most common type of cancer affecting women, encompasses a collection of histologic (mainly ductal and lobular) and molecular subtypes exhibiting diverse clinical presentation, disease trajectories, treatment options, and outcomes. Immunotherapy has revolutionized treatment for some solid tumors but has shown limited promise for breast cancers. In this review, we summarize recent advances in our understanding of the complex interactions between tumor and immune cells in subtypes of breast cancer at the cellular and microenvironmental levels. We aim to provide a perspective on opportunities for future immunotherapy agents tailored to specific features of each subtype of breast cancer.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although there are currently over 200 ongoing clinical trials testing immunotherapeutics, such as immune-checkpoint blockade agents, these are largely restricted to the triple-negative and HER2+ subtypes and primarily focus on T cells. With the rapid expansion of new in vitro, in vivo, and clinical data, it is critical to identify and highlight the challenges and opportunities unique for each breast cancer subtype to drive the next generation of treatments that harness the immune system.

Moving HER2-low breast cancer predictive and prognostic data from clinical trials into the real world

Background: Previous data, mostly from clinical trials, reported that HER2-low status is associated with low pathological complete response (pCR), and favourable prognosis. Since these findings suggest the existence of an additional breast cancer subtype, we questioned if the predictive/prognostic value of HER2-low was also relevant in the real world.

Methods: Data from non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery (2009–2020) were retrieved from our institutional prospectively-maintained registry. Univariable and multivariable logistic models were implemented to study the association between pCR and baseline HER2 status. Univariable analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) was performed through Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests.

Results: Starting from a total of 790 consecutive cases, we identified 444 newly-diagnosed breast cancer patients featuring HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0 (HER2-0, n = 109), and 1 + or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization negative (HER2-low, n = 335) receiving anthracycline and taxane-based regimens in 88.9% of cases. Most of the patients were diagnosed with stage II (67.3%) and there was no difference of disease presentation according to HER2-status. pCR was attained by 71 (16.0%) patients and was significantly associated with increased DFS (p = 0.031). Compared to HER2-0, HER2-low cases were more likely hormone receptor-positive (81.2% vs. 43.1%, p < 0.001), well-differentiated (47.5% vs. 26.6%, p = 0.001), less proliferative (21.5% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.001) and less responsive to treatment (pCR 11.6% vs. 29.4%, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in DFS according to HER2 status, though hormone-receptor (HR) negative/HER2-low cases tended to have a worse prognosis compared to HR-negative/HER2-0. By pCR achievement, 3-years DFS was 87.5.% (75.1–100%) vs. 71.6% (65.9–77.8%) (p = 0.161) in HER2-low and 89.1% (75.8–100%) vs. 72.1% (59.7–87.0%) (p = 0.092) in HER2-0.

Conclusion: Our real-world data show that HER2-low breast cancer patients represent roughly a half of the cases treated with neoadjuvant therapy, and have poor treatment response. In absence of pCR, HER2-low breast cancer patients have a dismal prognosis, especially when primary tumor hormone receptor status is negative. Studies are therefore needed to define the biology of these tumors for new therapeutic targets and to incorporate HER2-targeting agents in early-stage treatment.

Ki-67 Index Provides Long-Term Survival Information for Early-Stage HER2-Low-Positive Breast Cancer: A Single-Institute Retrospective Analysis

Aim

It has been reported that more than half of breast cancer (BC) could be identified as HER2-low-positive, which might be a distinct subtype. But the results are controversial. We aim to compare the survival outcomes between HER2-low-positive and HER2-0 BC with Asian women based on HR status or Ki-67 index.

Methods

Between January 2009 and December 2017, HER2-nonamplified BC in our single institute was identified. Patients were classified as HER2-low and HER2-0 cohort. Clinical characteristics were compared between these two groups and survival outcomes were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method. We also performed subgroup analysis according to Ki-67 index and hormone-receptor (HR) status.

Results

Of the 2,230 included patients, 536 presented with HER2-0, and 1,694 with HER2-low positive. After a median follow-up of 85 months (range: 1–152 months), the 8-year OS, BCSS, and RFS of the overall cohort were 91%, 95%, and 89%, respectively. In comparison with the HER2-0 cohort, majority of HER2-low-expression BC concurrently presented with HR positive (82.3% vs. 69%, P < 0.001). There was no significant survival difference between the two groups in terms of OS, BCSS, and RFS (all p > 0.05). We then performed subgroup analysis according to HR status and Ki-67 index (<14% vs. ≥14%). Our results indicated that there was no significant survival difference between HER2-low-positive and HER2-0 tumors regardless of HR status (p > 0.05), while OS (p=0.026) and BCSS (p=0.052) of HER2-0 BC with high Ki-67 index were significantly poorer than that of HER2-low positive with high Ki-67, but not for RFS (p=0.17).

Conclusion

Among early stage HER2-nonamplified BC, no significant survival difference could be found between HER2-low positive and HER2-0 cohort regardless of HR status. Survival outcomes of HER2-low positive with high Ki-67 seem to be poorer than that of HER2-0 tumors with high Ki-67 index.

Clinical, Pathological Complete Response, and Prognosis Characteristics of HER2-Low Breast Cancer in the Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Setting: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

The present study was conducted to evaluate the clinical, pathological response, and prognosis characteristics of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting.

METHODS

Patients with HER2-negative breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy from January 2017 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. HER2-negative breast cancer was divided into two groups: HER2-zero (defined as immunohistochemistry [IHC] 0) and HER2-low (defined as IHC 1+, or IHC 2+ and fluorescence in-situ hybridization-negative.

RESULTS

Overall, 314 patients with HER2-negative breast cancer were analyzed. The proportion of HER2-low patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease was higher than in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC; 75.3% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.032). In HR-positive breast cancer, HER2-low tumors presented less nodal involvement (p = 0.023) and earlier clinical stage (p = 0.015) compared with HER2-zero tumors; however, in TNBC, HER2-low patients had a later clinical stage (p = 0.028). With the pathological complete response (pCR) defined as ypTis/0ypN0, there was no difference in pCR rates among the entire cohort, HR-positive disease, and TNBC. However, with the pCR defined as ypT0ypN0, the pCR rate in HER2-low breast cancer was significantly lower than HER2-zero breast cancer in the entire cohort (24.3% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.032) and the HR-positive subgroup (18.7% vs. 32.1%, p = 0.035), but not for TNBC. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that HER2 status (low vs. zero) was an independent predictive factor for pCR (p = 0.013) in HR-positive breast cancer. There were no statistically significant differences in 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancer among the entire cohort, HR-positive disease, and TNBC.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-low breast cancer exhibits specific clinical features and different response to treatment associated with HR status in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting.

Impact of HER2 Status on Pathological Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Investigates the link between HER2 status and histological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early TNBC.

METHODS

We retrieved clinical and anatomopathological data retrospectively from 449 patients treated for the first time with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early unilateral BC between 2005 and 2020. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR, i.e., ypT0 ypN0), according to HER2 status. Secondary endpoints included invasive disease-free survival (I-DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

437 patients were included, and 121 (27.7%) patients had HER2-low tumours. The pCR rate was not significantly different between the HER2-low group vs. the HER2-0 group (35.7% versus 41.8%, p = 0.284) in either univariate analysis or multivariate analysis adjusted for TNM classification and grade (odds ratio [OR] = 0.70, confidence interval [CI] 95% 0.45-1.08). With a median follow-up of 72.9 months, no significant survival differences were observed between patients with HER2-low tumours vs. patients with HER2-0 tumours in terms of I-DFS (p = 0.487) and OS (p = 0.329).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, HER2 status was not significantly associated with pCR in a manner consistent with data published recently on TNBC. However, the prognostic impact of HER2-low expression among TNBC patients warrants further evaluation.

Clinical trial data and emerging strategies: HER2-positive breast cancer

A deeper insight into tumor biology and HER2 signaling has led to the development of novel anti-HER2 drugs that have significantly improved the prognosis of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. The breast cancer immune microenvironment has emerged as a potential prognostic factor. Moreover, the host immune system not only seems to play a critical role in the prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer, but also seems to modulate treatment response to some HER2-targeted agents. Here, we review the latest evidence of the role of immunotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer and present emerging strategies.

Ontogeny and Vulnerabilities of Drug-Tolerant Persisters in HER2+ Breast Cancer

Resistance to targeted therapies is an important clinical problem in HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. "Drug-tolerant persisters" (DTP), a subpopulation of cancer cells that survive via reversible, nongenetic mechanisms, are implicated in resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in other malignancies, but DTPs following HER2 TKI exposure have not been well characterized. We found that HER2 TKIs evoke DTPs with a luminal-like or a mesenchymal-like transcriptome. Lentiviral barcoding/single-cell RNA sequencing reveals that HER2+ breast cancer cells cycle stochastically through a "pre-DTP" state, characterized by a G0-like expression signature and enriched for diapause and/or senescence genes. Trajectory analysis/cell sorting shows that pre-DTPs preferentially yield DTPs upon HER2 TKI exposure. Cells with similar transcriptomes are present in HER2+ breast tumors and are associated with poor TKI response. Finally, biochemical experiments indicate that luminal-like DTPs survive via estrogen receptor-dependent induction of SGK3, leading to rewiring of the PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 pathway to enable AKT-independent mTORC1 activation.

SIGNIFICANCE

DTPs are implicated in resistance to anticancer therapies, but their ontogeny and vulnerabilities remain unclear. We find that HER2 TKI-DTPs emerge from stochastically arising primed cells ("pre-DTPs") that engage either of two distinct transcriptional programs upon TKI exposure. Our results provide new insights into DTP ontogeny and potential therapeutic vulnerabilities. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 873.

Post-translational modification of MALT1 and its role in B cell- and T cell-related diseases

Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation protein 1 (MALT1) is a multifunctional protein. MALT1 functions as an adaptor protein to assemble and recruit proteins such as B-cell lymphoma 10 (BCL10) and caspase-recruitment domain (CARD)-containing coiled-coil protein 11 (CARD11). Conversely it also acts as a paracaspase to cleave specified substrates. Because of its involvement in immunity, inflammation and cancer through its dual functions of scaffolding and catalytic activity, MALT1 is becoming a promising therapeutic target in B cell- and T cell-related diseases. There is growing evidence that the function of MALT1 is subtly modulated via post-translational modifications. This review summarized recent progress in relevant studies regarding the physiological and pathophysiological functions of MALT1, post-translational modifications of MALT1 and its role in B cell- and T cell- related diseases. In addition, the current available MALT1 inhibitors were also discussed.

HER2-low expression does not affect the clinical outcomes of metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor: A real-world study

BACKGROUND

There is accumulating evidence support human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low as a biologically distinct subtype of breast cancer. The present study was conducted to explore whether HER2-low expression will affect the clinical efficacy of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer who were treated with palbociclib from January 2019 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed based on real-world clinical practice. HER2-zero was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0, and HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) negative. The primary end point was progression free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival(OS) and safety.

RESULTS

45 patients received palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant therapy, including 24 HER-2-zero and 21 HER-2-low patients. There were no statistically significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in ORR (41.7% vs. 28.6%, P=0.360) and DCR (79.2% vs. 76.2%, P=0.811) between HER-2-zero and HER-2-low patients. And simultaneously, HER2-zero and HER2-low patients obtained similar median PFS (16.2m vs. 14.1m, P=0.263). The median OS was not reached. Neutropenia and leukopenia were the most common adverse events. Grade 3-4 adverse events(AEs) occurred in 58.3% and 57.1% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-low expression does not affect the clinical efficacy of palbociclib and our present study did not support incorporating HER2-low into systemic therapy decisions for patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor.

TAD1822-7 induces ROS-mediated apoptosis of HER2 positive breast cancer by decreasing E-cadherin in an EphB4 dependent manner

HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2-BC) shows the over-expression of tyrosine kinase receptor EphB4 associated with poor disease prognosis. E-cadherin is found as a survival factor in multiple models of breast cancer by suppressing reactive oxygen-mediated apoptosis. This study confirmed that both HER2 and EphB4 are positively correlated with E-cadherin in HER2-BC. Inhibition of HER2 or EphB4 is discovered to induce ROS-dependent apoptosis by decreasing E-cadherin expression in SKBR3 and MDA-MB-453 cells. TAD1822-7 (TAD), a novel biphenyl urea taspine derivative, exhibits good growth inhibition, apoptosis induction and ROS accumulation effects on SKBR3 and MDA-MB-453 cells. Mechanistic investigation revealed that TAD blockades both EphB4 positive signal transduction and activation of HER2 signal transduction, thereby suppressing E-cadherin/TGF-β/p-Smad2/3 signaling axis to elicit ROS-dependent endogenous mitochondrial apoptosis. Together, these findings not only provide a new approach for HER2-BC therapy but also increase our understanding of the regulating effect of E-cadherin by HER2 and EphB4 in ROS-mediated apoptosis.

Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy is associated with HER2 immunohistochemistry score in HER2-positive early breast cancer

To evaluate whether pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy is dependent on the HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score.A total of 181 HER2-positive early breast cancer patients who had received neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy were included in this study. Associations were examined between IHC score and tumor pCR status (commonly defined by ypT0+ypN0, ypT0/is+ypN0, or ypT0/is).In trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant-treated patients, ypT0+ypN0 was achieved in 46.0% of patients with HER2 IHC 3+ tumors but only 25.0% of patients with HER2 IHC 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-positive tumors (P = .016). When pCR was defined as ypT0/is+ypN0 or ypT0/is, 54.7% and 61.3% of patients with HER2 IHC 3+ tumors had a pCR, whereas only 29.5% and 38.6% with HER2 IHC 2+/FISH-positive tumors achieved pCR (P = .004 and P = .008, respectively). The association between dual HER2 blockade and pCR was almost exclusively confined to HER2 IHC 3+ tumors (ypT0+ypN0: 61.9% vs 38.9%, P = .013; ypT0/is+ypN0: 71.4% vs 47.4%, P = .009; and ypT0/is: 81.0% vs 52.6%, P = .002) and was absent in HER2 IHC 2+/FISH-positive tumors. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that HER2 IHC 3+ tumors had a significantly higher probability of achieving ypT0+ypN0 (odds ratio [OR], 0.265; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.109-0.645; P = .003), ypT0/is+ypN0 (OR, 0.221; 95% CI, 0.094-0.521; P = .001), and ypT0/is (OR, 0.254; 95% CI, 0.111-0.583; P = .001) than HER2 IHC 2+/FISH-positive tumors. A significantly better pCR rate was also found in patients with T1 tumors and patients with dual HER2 blockade.The pCR rate was highly correlated with the HER2 IHC score in neoadjuvant anti-HER2 treatment. The addition of pertuzumab to a neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based regimen improved pCR rates, but there was no significant difference in pCR rates in the IHC 2+/FISH-positive group. This suggests that HER2 IHC scores can predict the effectiveness of treatment.

HER2 Activation and Endocrine Treatment Resistance in HER2-negative Breast Cancer

The lethality of estrogen receptor alpha positive (ER+) breast cancer, which is often considered to have better prognosis than other subtypes, is defined by resistance to the standard of care endocrine treatment. Relapse and metastasis are inevitable in almost every patient whose cancer is resistant to endocrine treatment. Therefore, understanding the underlying causes of treatment resistance remains an important biological and clinical focus of research in this area. Growth factor receptor pathway activation, specifically HER2 activation, has been identified as 1 mechanism of endocrine treatment resistance across a range of experimental model systems. However, clinical trials conducted to test whether targeting HER2 benefits patients with endocrine treatment-resistant ER+ breast cancer have consistently and disappointingly shown mixed results. One reason for the failure of these clinical trials could be the complexity of crosstalk between ER, HER2, and other growth factor receptors and the fluidity of HER2 activation in these cells, which makes it challenging to identify stratifiers for this targeted intervention. In the absence of stratifiers that can be assayed at diagnosis to allow prospective tailoring of HER2 inhibition to the right patients, clinical trials will continue to disappoint. To understand stratifiers, it is important that the field invests in key understudied areas of research including characterization of the tumor secretome and receptor activation in response to endocrine treatment, and mapping the ER-HER2 growth factor network in the normal and developing mammary gland. Understanding these mechanisms further is critical to improving outcomes for the hard-to-treat endocrine treatment-resistant ER+ breast cancer cohort.

Management of Early-Stage Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer

The addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy dramatically improved the prognosis of early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. However, 15%-31% of patients still develop disease recurrence, on the basis of long-term follow-up of adjuvant pivotal trials. A better understanding of tumor biology has led to the development of optimized anti-HER2 drugs and add-on strategies to further improve survival outcomes. In the neoadjuvant setting, dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab plus chemotherapy has increased the rate of pathologic complete response, a surrogate marker of improved long-term outcome; yet, in the adjuvant setting, it has led to small benefits in invasive disease-free survival. Extended adjuvant therapy with the irreversible pan-HER2 inhibitor neratinib is an option for selected patients with HER2-positive and estrogen receptor-positive disease who have received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. Additionally, the use of the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab-emtansine has led to a significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival for patients with residual disease following neoadjuvant therapy and has taught us the importance of using preoperative therapy to adapt adjuvant treatment. Nevertheless, recurrences in the brain remain an important caveat, and not all patients benefit to the same extent from anti-HER2 therapies. Biologic heterogeneity within HER2-positive disease may modulate treatment response and prognosis. De-escalating treatment strategies to avoid unnecessary treatments and toxicities, without compromising outcomes, have become a crucial focus of research. To stratify patient risks and optimize treatment selection, other biomarkers including intrinsic subtype, level of HER2, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes should be further evaluated. We discuss the latest evidence on the current approach of early-stage, HER2-positive breast cancer and present future perspectives on its management.