Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery vs. surgery alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Cycles on Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Research investigating the potential impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy cycles on patients with lymph node-negative gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is currently sparse. This study aims to explore the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles on the prognosis of this specific patient group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed clinicopathological data from patients at four institutions between 2010 and 2020. Independent risk factors associated with 3-year overall survival (OS) were identified using a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

We enrolled a total of 219 patients in this study. Patients with lymph node-negative gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent at least five cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC ≥ 5) after surgery had a significantly higher 3-year overall survival rate of 86.8% compared with those who received fewer than five cycles (AC < 5) with a survival rate of 68.1% (P = 0.016). Multivariate analysis identified several factors, including AC ≥ 5 (HR 0.367, 95% CI 0.166-0.815, P = 0.014), ypT stage ≥ 2 (HR 2.779, 95% CI 1.199-6.438, P = 0.017), and poorly differentiated tumors (HR 2.501, 95% CI 1.385-4.517, P = 0.002), as independently associated with 3-year OS in this patient group. Stratified analysis further revealed that AC ≥ 5 significantly enhanced long-term outcomes in patients with ypT stage ≥2 (3-year OS, 82.5% vs. 62.6%, P = 0.025) and in those with poorly differentiated tumors (3-year OS, 82.6% vs. 53.3%, P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Patients who have lymph node-negative gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with either ypT stage ≥ 2 or poorly differentiated gastric cancers, may experience benefits from undergoing at least five cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Impact of pathological complete response on survival in gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

The survival benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients are inconsistent. This study aims to investigate how different tumor regression grades (TRG) influence the survival gains associated with NAC treatment.

METHODS

This study compared the treatment outcomes of patients who underwent CSC (neoadjuvant chemotherapy - surgery - adjuvant chemotherapy) with those receiving traditional SC (surgery - adjuvant chemotherapy) treatment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to minimize potential biases arising from differences in baseline characteristics and intervention factors between the treatment groups. After PSM, the CSC cohort was stratified according to TRGs, and their survival outcomes were compared to assess the impact of TRGs on survival gains associated with NAC.

RESULTS

Before PSM, a total of 506 patients were enrolled: 291 in the CSC cohort and 215 in the SC cohort. The CSC cohort had a lower 3-year survival rate (3Y-SR) than the SC cohort (64.6% vs. 76%). In the CSC cohort, patients who achieved pathological complete response (pCR, 12.1%, 26/215) demonstrated significantly improved 3Y-SR (95.5%). After PSM, 110 patients were matched in each cohort. The 3Y-SR was similar between the CSC cohort (68.3%) and the SC cohort (63.6%). In the CSC cohort, 12.7% (14/110) of patients achieved pCR. Subgroup analysis revealed that the pCR subgroup (3Y-SR 100%) was the only subgroup within the CSC cohort that maintained significantly improved survival compared to the SC cohort. Better tumor differentiation was the only pre-treatment factor significantly associated with achieving pCR (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, LAGC patients who achieved pCR after NAC demonstrated significantly better survival outcomes compared to other response groups. The study found tumor differentiation was a potential predictor of pCR.

Impact of body composition, grip strength, and physical performance on clinical outcomes for locally advanced gastric cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) is critical in treating locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). However, the effect of body composition, grip strength, and physical performance during neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the impact of these factors on perioperative clinical outcomes in LAGC patients undergoing NC.

METHODS

A total of 162 consecutive patients receiving NC at two centers were prospectively registered between June 2022 and September 2023. The data on body composition parameters, grip strength, and physical performance during NC were collected, compared, and analyzed. The primary outcome was the tumor response after completion of NC.

RESULTS

Overall, we included 92 LAGC patients. No significant changes were observed in body composition, grip strength, and physical performance after NC. The change in skeletal muscle index and grip strength were both significantly lower in the patients with poor tumor response. According to the Youden index, the cutoff values of △SMI and △grip strength were -2.0 and -2.8, respectively. Based on these two parameters, the area under the curve to predict tumor response was 0.817 (P < 0.001). Furthermore, visceral fat index (VFI) loss >6.9 and 5-time chair stand test increase >2.4 independently predicted postoperative complication (OR: 3.82, 95% CI: 1.138-12.815, P = 0.030; OR: 5.01, 95% CI: 1.086-23.131, P = 0.039, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

For LAGC patients receiving NC, changes in SMI, VFI, grip strength, and physical status can predict perioperative clinical outcomes. These patients should be given special nutritional intervention.

Donafenib as neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced thyroid cancer: protocol for the DONATHYCA phase II prospective single-arm trial in China

INTRODUCTION

The invasion of important structures in locally advanced thyroid cancer (LATC) hinders radical resection, increases the risk of recurrence and even prevents surgery. Creating the opportunity for radical operation in patients with LATC is critical for improving their prognosis. Multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitors were used as neoadjuvant therapy in several studies. Donafenib produced survival benefits over placebo in Chinese patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer in a recent study, but its efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting remains unknown. This study thus aims to assess the efficacy and safety of donafenib as neoadjuvant therapy in LATC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

DONATHYCA is a prospective, exploratory, single-arm phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of donafenib as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with LATC. 13 patients will be enrolled. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours V.1.1. The secondary objectives include progression-free survival, the duration of response, the disease control rate, the R0/R1 resection rate, quality of life and toxicity during treatment according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.4.0. Patients will receive donafenib 300 mg two times a day continuously in a 21-day treatment cycle for six cycles.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fujian Cancer Hospital (K2023-144-02) on 27 July 2023 and registered in the China Clinical Trial Registry on 20 September 2023. The results of the study will be presented at academic conferences and published in scientific publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2300075973.

Postoperative Complications After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery in Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Nationwide Study in Finland

BACKGROUND

To date, no large population-based studies have compared complications and short-term outcomes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and upfront surgery in gastric cancer. More nationwide studies with standardized reporting on complications are needed to enable international comparison between studies. This study aimed to compare postoperative complications between neoadjuvant therapy and upfront surgery after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in a population-based setting.

METHODS

This population-based study based on the Finnish National Esophago-Gastric Cancer Cohort included all patients 18 years of age or older undergoing gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in Finland during 2005-2016. Logistic regression provided odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), both crude and adjusted for key confounders. Different types of complications were graded based on the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group definitions, and major complications were assessed by the Clavien-Dindo scale.

RESULTS

This study analyzed 769 patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase major postoperative complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with upfront surgery (OR, 1.12; 95% CI 0.81-1.56). Furthermore, it did not increase pneumonia, anastomotic complications, wound complications, or other complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant therapy is not associated with increased postoperative complications, reoperations, or short-term mortality compared with upfront surgery in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Is mechanical bowel preparation mandatory for elective colon surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence demonstrates minimal impact of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) on reducing postoperative complications following elective colectomy. This study investigated the necessity of MBP prior to elective colonic resection.

METHOD

A systematic literature review was conducted across PubMed, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies comparing the effects of MBP with no preparation before elective colectomy, up until May 26, 2023. Surgical-related outcomes were compiled and subsequently analyzed. The primary outcomes included the incidence of anastomosis leakage (AL) and surgical site infection (SSI), analyzed using Review Manager Software (v 5.3).

RESULTS

The analysis included 14 studies, comprising seven RCTs with 5146 participants. Demographic information was consistent across groups. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of AL ((P = 0.43, OR = 1.16, 95% CI (0.80, 1.68), I2 = 0%) or SSI (P = 0.47, OR = 1.20, 95% CI (0.73, 1.96), I2 = 0%), nor were there significant differences in other outcomes. Subgroup analysis on oral antibiotic use showed no significant changes in results. However, in cases of right colectomy, the group without preparation showed a significantly lower incidence of SSI (P = 0.01, OR = 0.52, 95% CI (0.31, 0.86), I2 = 1%). No significant differences were found in other subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION

The current evidence robustly indicates that MBP before elective colectomy does not confer significant benefits in reducing postoperative complications. Therefore, it is justified to forego MBP prior to elective colectomy, irrespective of tumor location.

Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent gastrectomy for LAGC (cT2-4aN+M0) after NACT from January 2015 to December 2019. The patients were divided into a LG group and an open gastrectomy (OG) group. The short- and long-term outcomes in both groups were examined following propensity score matching.

RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed 288 patients with LAGC who underwent gastrectomy following NACT. Of these 288 patients, 218 were enrolled; after 1:1 propensity score matching, each group comprised 81 patients. The LG group had significantly lower estimated blood loss than the OG group [80 (50-110) vs. 280 (210-320) mL, P < 0.001) but a longer operation time [205 (186.5-222.5) vs. 182 (170-190) min, P < 0.001], a lower postoperative complication rate (24.7% vs. 42.0%, P = 0.002), and a shorter postoperative hospitalization period [8 (7-10) vs. 10 (8-11.5) days, P = 0.001]. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy had a lower rate of postoperative complications than patients in the OG group (18.8% vs. 38.6%, P = 0.034); however, such a pattern was not seen in patients who underwent total gastrectomy (32.3% vs. 45.9%, P = 0.251). The 3-year matched cohort analysis showed no significant difference in overall survival or recurrence-free survival (log-rank P = 0.816 and P = 0.726, respectively) (71.3% and 65.0% in OG vs. 69.1% and 61.7% in LG, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In the short term, LG following NACT is safer and more effective than OG. However, the long-term results are comparable.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes following neoadjuvant therapy in upfront resectable gastric cancers compared to surgery alone in phase III randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality globally. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in upfront resectable gastric cancer is a subject of ongoing research. In recent meta-analyses, R0 resection rate and superior outcomes were not consistently observed in such regimens.

AIM

To describe the outcomes following phase III randomised control trials; comparing neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery against upfront surgery with and without adjuvant therapy in resectable gastric cancers.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science was searched from January 2002 to September 2022.

RESULTS

13 studies were included (3280 participants). R0 resection rates were in neoadjuvant therapy arms as compared to adjuvant therapy with odds ratio (OR) 1.55[95% CI: 1.13, 2.13](p=0.007) and compared to surgery alone OR 2.49[95% CI: 1.56, 3.96](p=0.0001). 3-year and 5-year progression-, event- and disease-free survival in neoadjuvant therapy as compared to adjuvant therapy were not significantly increased, 3-year OR 0.87[0.71, 1.07](p=0.19). Meanwhile, comparing neoadjuvant therapy to adjuvant therapy, 3-year overall survival (OS) hazard ratio was 0.88[95% CI: 0.70, 1.11](p=0.71) while 3- and 5-year OS OR was 1.18[95% CI: 0.90, 1.55], p=0.22 and 1.27[95% CI: 0.67, 2.42](p=0.47) respectively. Surgical complications were also more common with neoadjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant therapy yields higher rates of R0 resection. However, improved long-term survival was not seen as compared to adjuvant therapy. Large multi-centred randomised control trials with D2 lymphadenectomy should be performed to better evaluate the treatment modalities.

MORBIDITY AND SURVIVAL AFTER PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY IN GASTRIC CANCER: A STUDY USING THE BECKER'S CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is an aggressive neoplasm with a poor prognosis. The multimodal approach with perioperative chemotherapy is currently the recommended treatment for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. This treatment induces a histopathological response expressed either through the degree of regression of the primary tumor or of the lymph nodes or through yTNM staging. Despite its advantages, there are still doubts regarding the effects of chemotherapy on postoperative morbidity and mortality.

AIMS

This study aims to evaluate the impact of perioperative chemotherapy and its effect on anatomopathological results and postoperative morbidity and on patient survival.

METHODS

This is an observational retrospective study on 134 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent perioperative chemotherapy and curative radical surgery. The degree of histological regression of the primary tumor was evaluated according to Becker's criteria; the proportion of regressed lymph nodes was determined, and postoperative complications were evaluated according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Survival times were compared between the groups using Kaplan-Meier curves and the Mantel-Cox log-rank test.

RESULTS

In all, 22.3% of the patients were classified as good responders and 75.9% as poor responders. This variable was not correlated with operative morbidity (p=1.68); 64.2% of patients had invaded lymph nodes and 46.3% had regressed lymph nodes; and 49.4% had no lymphatic invasion and 61.9% had no signs of venous invasion. Postoperative complications occurred in 30.6% of the patients. The group of good responders had an average survival of 56.0 months and the group of poor responders had 34.0 months (p=0.17).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative chemotherapy induces regression in both the primary tumor and lymph nodes. The results of the operative morbidity were similar to those described in the literature. However, although the group of good responders showed better survival, this value was not significant. Therefore, further studies are needed to evaluate the importance of the degree of lymph node regression and its impact on the survival of these patients.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Asian Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

Presently, surgery is the only treatment approach for gastric cancer and improving the prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer is one of the key factors in promoting gastric cancer survival benefit. The MAGIC study was the first to demonstrate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in European countries. In recent years, several clinical trials have provided evidence for the use of NAC in Asian patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. However, clinical practice guidelines vary between Asian and non-Asian populations. Optimal NAC regimens, proper target populations, and predictors of NAC outcomes in Asian patients are still under investigation. Herein, we summarized the current progress in the administration of NAC in Asian patients with gastric cancer.

Hyperthermia combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Synergistic sensitization and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Within the field of oncotherapy, research interest regarding immunotherapy has risen to the point that it is now seen as a key application. However, inherent disadvantages of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as their low response rates and immune-related adverse events (irAEs), currently restrict their clinical application. Were these disadvantages to be overcome, more patients could derive prolonged benefits from ICIs. At present, many basic experiments and clinical studies using hyperthermia combined with ICI treatment (HIT) have been performed and shown the potential to address the above challenges. Therefore, this review extensively summarizes the knowledge and progress of HIT for analysis and discusses the effect and feasibility.

METHODS

In this review, we explored the PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov databases, with regard to the searching terms "immune checkpoint inhibitor, immunotherapy, hyperthermia, ablation, photothermal therapy".

RESULTS

By reviewing the literature, we analyzed how hyperthermia influences tumor immunology and improves the efficacy of ICI. Hyperthermia can trigger a series of multifactorial molecular cascade reactions between tumors and immunization and can significantly induce cytological modifications within the tumor microenvironment (TME). The pharmacological potency of ICIs can be enhanced greatly through the immunomodulatory amelioration of immunosuppression, and the activation of immunostimulation. Emerging clinical trials outcome regarding HIT have verified and enriched the theoretical foundation of synergistic sensitization.

CONCLUSION

HIT research is now starting to transition from preclinical studies to clinical investigations. Several HIT sensitization mechanisms have been reflected and demonstrated as significant survival benefits for patients through pioneering clinical trials. Further studies into the theoretical basis and practical standards of HIT, combined with larger-scale clinical studies involving more cancer types, will be necessary for the future.

Short and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) combined with surgery is regarded as an effective treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Laparoscopic surgery represents the mainstream of minimally invasive surgery. Currently, surgeons focus more on surgical safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy after NACT. Thus, we sought to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) and open total gastrectomy (OTG) after NACT.

AIM

To compare the short and long-term outcomes between LTG and OTG for AGC after NACT.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the clinicopathological data of 136 patients who accepted gastrectomy after NACT from June 2012 to June 2019, including 61 patients who underwent LTG and 75 who underwent OTG. Clinicopathological characteristics between the LTG and OTG groups showed no significant difference. SPSS 26.0, R software, and GraphPad PRISM 8.0 were used to perform statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 136 patients included, eight acquired pathological complete response, and the objective response rate was 47.8% (65/136). The LTG group had longer operation time (P = 0.015), less blood loss (P = 0.003), shorter days to first flatus (P < 0.001), and shorter postoperative hospitalization days (P < 0.001). LTG spent more surgical cost than OTG (P < 0.001), while total hospitalized cost of LTG was less than OTG (P < 0.001). 21 (28.0%) patients in the OTG group and 14 (23.0%) in the LTG group had 30-d postoperative complications, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.503). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 60.6% and 64.6% in the LTG and OTG groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.859, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.522-1.412, P = 0.546], while the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 54.5% and 51.8% in the LTG and OTG group, respectively (HR = 0.947, 95%CI: 0.582-1.539, P = 0.823). Multivariate cox analysis showed that body mass index and pTNM stage were independent risk factors for OS while vascular invasion and pTNM stage were independent risk factors for DFS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

After NACT, LTG shows comparable 30-d postoperative morbidity as well as 3-year OS and DFS rate to OTG. We recommend that experienced surgeons select LTG other than OTG for proper AGC patients after NACT.

Photodynamic Therapy in Combination with Chemotherapy, Targeted, and Immunotherapy As a Successful Therapeutic Approach for Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Objective: To explore the efficacy of photodynamic therapy combined with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy in poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). Background: Advanced GAC has high malignancy and mortality rate. To date, no study has applied photodynamic treatment (PDT) combined with chemo-, targeted, and immunotherapy to treat this cancer. Patient and methods: Clinical data of a patient diagnosed with poorly differentiated GAC admitted to the department of oncology of the Lanzhou University Second Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patient underwent four PDT procedures combined with chemo-, targeted, and immunotherapy. Results: A 72-year-old male patient received combination therapy of PDT. This treatment resolved the cancerous tissues and levels of tumor markers. There was no recurrence and metastasis during a 7-month follow-up. Conclusions: Combination therapy of PDT can effectively treat tumors and may be a method suitable for elderly patients with advanced GAC.

Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) after neoadjuvant therapy (NT) for gastric cancer restaging by meta-analysis. We conducted a systematic search of studies published on PubMed and Web of Science up to 30th August 2021. Assessing the risk of bias in the included studies was done with the QUADAS-2 tool. We used R and Review Manager 5.4.1 for calculations and statistical analysis. To evaluate the diagnostic value of EUS after NT for gastric cancer restaging, we performed a meta-analysis on six studies, with a total of 283 patients, including true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative results for T1-T4, N0. EUS as a diagnostic test for GC patients after chemotherapy has a relatively low DOR for the T2 (3.96) and T4 stages (4.79) and a relatively high partial AUC for the T2 (0.85) and T4 (0.71) stages. Our results reveal that the pooled sensitivity for T stages after chemotherapy is rather low (29–56%), except for the T3 stage (71%). A potential limitation of our study was the small number of included studies, but no significant heterogeneity was found between them. Our meta-analysis concludes that EUS is not recommended or is still under debate for GC restaging after NT.