Cancer Rates in Adults After Cardiac Interventions: A Preliminary Observational Report

Epidemiological and Prognostic Importance of New-Onset Cancer as a Net Adverse Clinical Outcome after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

The study assessed the epidemiological frequency and prognostic impact of new-onset cancer as an additional net adverse clinical outcome in patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), considering its potential clinical significance alongside classical endpoints. This study was designed as a single-center observational study, including 1285 consecutive patients who were diagnosed as STEMI patients as the subject, and the frequency and prognosis of new-onset cancer after STEMI onset were assessed. The incidence of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and bleeding were analyzed as classical endpoints. Throughout an average of a 1241.4 days observation period, cancers were observed in 7.0% of patients (n = 90), showing development at a constant rate throughout this period (incidence rate, 0.06/1000 person-years). The average duration from STEMI onset to cancer diagnosis was 1371.4 days. Death, MI, or stroke were observed in 21.3%, 4.0%, 6.5%, and 12.8%, giving incidence rates of 0.18, 0.03, 0.06, and 0.11/1000 person-years, respectively. Long-term mortality was higher in patients with newly diagnosed cancer than in patients without cancer (36.7% vs. 20.1%, p < 0.01). Cancer after STEMI should be considered as an additional major adverse clinical event because of its high incidence, constant development, and high mortality in comparison to classical endpoints.

Cardiac surgery and long-term risk for incident cancer: A nationwide population-based study

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies indicate an increased long-term risk for incident cancer and cancer-specific mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We compared the risk for incident cancer and cancer-specific mortality between patients and matched control subjects from the general population.

METHODS

All patients (n = 127,119) undergoing first-time coronary artery or heart valve surgery in Sweden during 1997-2020 were included in a population-based observational cohort study based on individual data from the SWEDEHEART registry and 4 other mandatory national registries. The patients were compared with an age-, sex-, and place of residence-matched control population (n = 415,287) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and socioeconomic factors. A propensity score-matched analysis with 81,522 well-balanced pairs was also performed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 9.2 (range, 0-24) years. A total of 31,361/127,119 patients (24.7%) and 102,959/415,287 control subjects (24.8%) developed cancer during follow-up. The crude event rates were 2.75 and 2.83 per 100 person-years, respectively. The adjusted risk for cancer and cancer-specific mortality was lower in patients (adjusted hazard ratios 0.86 [95% CI, 0.85-0.88] and 0.64 [95% CI, 0.62-0.65], respectively). The propensity score-matched analysis showed similar results (hazard ratios, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.86-0.90] and 0.65 [95% CI, 0.63-0.68], respectively). The results were consistent in subgroups based on sex, age, and comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent cardiac surgery have lower risk for cancer and cancer-specific mortality than matched control subjects.

Risk Scores of Bleeding Complications in Patients on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: How to Optimize Identification of Patients at Risk of Bleeding after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces the risk of ischemic events but reduces the risk of ischemic events but increases the risk of bleeding, which in turn is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. With the aim to offer personalized treatment regimens to patients undergoing PCI, much effort has been devoted in the last decade to improve the identification of patients at increased risk of bleeding complications. Several clinical scores have been developed and validated in large populations of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and are currently recommended by guidelines to evaluate bleeding risk and individualize the type and duration of antithrombotic therapy after PCI. In clinical practice, these risk scores are conventionally computed at the time of PCI using baseline features and risk factors. Yet, bleeding risk is dynamic and can change over time after PCI, since patients can worsen or improve their clinical status and accumulate comorbidities. Indeed, evidence now exists that the estimated risk of bleeding after PCI can change over time. This concept is relevant, as the inappropriate estimation of bleeding risk, either at the time of revascularization or subsequent follow-up visits, might lead to erroneous therapeutic management. Serial evaluation and recalculation of bleeding risk scores during follow-up can be important in clinical practice to improve the identification of patients at higher risk of bleeding while on DAPT after PCI.

DNA Checkpoint and Repair Factors Are Nuclear Sensors for Intracellular Organelle Stresses-Inflammations and Cancers Can Have High Genomic Risks

Under inflammatory conditions, inflammatory cells release reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) which cause DNA damage. If not appropriately repaired, DNA damage leads to gene mutations and genomic instability. DNA damage checkpoint factors (DDCF) and DNA damage repair factors (DDRF) play a vital role in maintaining genomic integrity. However, how DDCFs and DDRFs are modulated under physiological and pathological conditions are not fully known. We took an experimental database analysis to determine the expression of 26 DNA DDCFs and 42 DNA DDRFs in 21 human and 20 mouse tissues in physiological/pathological conditions. We made the following significant findings: (1) Few DDCFs and DDRFs are ubiquitously expressed in tissues while many are differentially regulated.; (2) the expression of DDCFs and DDRFs are modulated not only in cancers but also in sterile inflammatory disorders and metabolic diseases; (3) tissue methylation status, pro-inflammatory cytokines, hypoxia regulating factors and tissue angiogenic potential can determine the expression of DDCFs and DDRFs; (4) intracellular organelles can transmit the stress signals to the nucleus, which may modulate the cell death by regulating the DDCF and DDRF expression. Our results shows that sterile inflammatory disorders and cancers increase genomic instability, therefore can be classified as pathologies with a high genomic risk. We also propose a new concept that as parts of cellular sensor cross-talking network, DNA checkpoint and repair factors serve as nuclear sensors for intracellular organelle stresses. Further, this work would lead to identification of novel therapeutic targets and new biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of metabolic diseases, inflammation, tissue damage and cancers.

Associated Risk of Malignancy in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: Evidence and Possible Mechanism

Cardiovascular disease and malignancy are leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Increased risk of malignancy was identified in patients with cardiovascular disease, including patients with heart failure, heart failure after myocardial infarction, patients undergoing cardiac intervention, and patients after a thrombotic event. Common risk factors and biological pathways can explain this association and are explored in this review. Further research is needed to establish the causes of malignancy in this population and direct possible intervention.

Heart Failure After Myocardial Infarction Is Associated With Increased Risk of Cancer

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is associated with excess morbidity and mortality for which noncardiac causes are increasingly recognized. The authors previously described an increased risk of cancer among HF patients compared with community controls.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined whether HF was associated with an increased risk of subsequent cancer among a homogenous population of first myocardial infarction (MI) survivors.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted among Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with incident MI from 2002 to 2010. Patients with prior cancer or HF diagnoses were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 1,081 participants (mean age 64 ± 15 years; 60% male) were followed for 5,327 person-years (mean 4.9 ± 3.0 years). A total of 228 patients developed HF, and 98 patients developed cancer (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer). Incidence density rates for cancer diagnosis (per 1,000 person-years) were 33.7 for patients with HF and 15.6 for patients without HF (p = 0.002). The hazard ratio (HR) for cancer associated with HF was 2.16 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39 to 3.35); adjusted for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity index; HR: 1.71 (95% CI: 1.07 to 2.73). The HRs for mortality associated with cancer were 4.90 (95% CI: 3.10 to 7.74) for HF-free and 3.91 (95% CI: 1.88 to 8.12) for HF patients (p for interaction = 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who develop HF after MI have an increased risk of cancer. This finding extends our previous report of an elevated cancer risk after HF compared with controls, and calls for a better understanding of shared risk factors and underlying mechanisms.