Is Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Incidence of Complications After Posterior Instrumented Lumbar Fusion? A National Claims Database Analysis

The Influence of Preoperative Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapy on Rebleeding Rates in Patients Suffering from Spinal Metastatic Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

The age of patients requiring surgery for spinal metastasis, primarily those over 65, has risen due to improved cancer treatments. Surgical intervention targets acute neurological deficits and instability. Anticoagulants are increasingly used, especially in the elderly, but pose challenges in managing bleeding complications. The study examines the correlation between preoperative anticoagulant/antiplatelet use and bleeding risks in spinal metastasis surgery, which is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a retrospective study at our department from 2010 to 2023, spinal tumor surgery patients were analyzed. Data included demographics, neurological status, surgical procedure, preoperative anticoagulant/antiplatelet use, intra-/postoperative coagulation management, and the incidence of rebleeding. Coagulation management involved blood loss assessment, coagulation factor administration, and fluid balance monitoring post-surgery. Lab parameters were documented at admission, preop, postop, and discharge.

RESULTS

A cohort of 290 patients underwent surgical treatment for spinal metastases, predominantly males (63.8%, n = 185) with a median age of 65 years. Preoperatively, 24.1% (n = 70) were on oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet therapy. Within 30 days, a rebleeding rate of 4.5% (n = 9) occurred, unrelated to preoperative anticoagulation status (p > 0.05). A correlation was found between preoperative neurologic deficits (p = 0.004) and rebleeding risk and the number of levels treated surgically, with fewer levels associated with a higher incidence of postoperative bleeding (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical intervention for spinal metastatic cancer appears to be safe regardless of the patient's preoperative anticoagulation status. However, it remains imperative to customize preoperative planning and preparation for each patient, emphasizing meticulous risk-benefit analysis and optimizing perioperative care.

Preoperative glycated hemoglobin concentration and early postoperative infections in patients undergoing spinal surgery: A systematic review

Early postoperative infections can affect a significant number of spinal surgery patients. Many studies reported on the features that may associate with elevated risk of infectious complications in this group. Data on the impact of glucose metabolism disorders in this area are well known. At the same time information on the correlation of preoperative HbA1c level and postoperative infections in spinal surgery are still scarce. Furthermore there are no strict recommendations regarding routine HbA1c testing prior to elective surgery. In present SR we aimed to report available clinical evidence on association between preoperative HbA1c and early postoperative infections. We used PubMed and EMBASE database and a set of specific key words (spine surgery AND infections AND HbA1c) to identify eligible studies. The study was registered in PROSPERO database and reported according to PRISMA recommendations. 16 studies were selected for further assessment. Predominance of data indicated a significant correlation between preoperative HbA1c concentration and elevated risk of postoperative infections, as well as higher rate of non - infective complications and worse patients future outcome. Adequately designed future studies on purposely dimensioned sample size are needed to confirm the role of preoperative HbA1c testing in preoperative management of spinal surgery patients.

The Effect of Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome on Spine Surgery Outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diabetes and metabolic syndrome are highly prevalent in patients undergoing spine surgery. This review aims to capture both the findings of recently published literature investigating the effects of diabetes and metabolic syndrome on spine surgery outcomes and the current best practices in patient management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diabetes and metabolic syndrome both contribute to worse outcomes in patients undergoing spine surgery. Although patients with diabetes are at greater risk of complications, those with uncontrolled diabetes experience increased healthcare costs and greater odds of postoperative complications. Furthermore, metabolic syndrome is repeatedly shown to have an adverse effect on spine surgery outcomes, including healthcare costs and medical complications. Spine surgeons should coordinate care with primary care physicians to optimize the preoperative profile of patients with comorbidities like diabetes and metabolic syndrome to minimize operative risk. With the shift to value-based care, understanding the patient factors that lead to complications is becoming increasingly important. Future studies should build upon the current literature and design preoperative interventions for at-risk patients. Additionally, further research is needed to analyze the modulatory effects of the social determinants of health in patients with diabetes and metabolic syndrome.

Factors Associated With Nonunion and Infection Following Ankle Arthrodesis Using a Large Claims Database: Who Has Elevated Risk?

Background:

Complications such as nonunion and infection following ankle arthrodesis can lead to increased patient morbidity and financial burden from repeat operations. Improved knowledge of risk factors can improve patient selection and inform post–ankle arthrodesis surveillance protocols.

Methods:

This is a large retrospective, database study with structured query of a national insurance claims database (PearlDiver Technologies) for patients treated with ankle arthrodesis from 2015 to 2019 as identified by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), codes. Patients with any operation 1 year prior to or following ankle arthrodesis were excluded from analysis to prevent attributing complications to another operation. Likelihoods of nonunion and infection within 1 year and 3 years following ankle arthrodesis were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimations. Patient characteristics associated with the identified complications following ankle arthrodesis were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results:

Our query yielded 2463 patients in the 5-year period who underwent ankle arthrodesis. Nonunion occurred in 11% (95% CI 10-12) of patients within 1 year of ankle arthrodesis and 16% (95% CI 14-17) of patients within 3 years. Infection occurred in 3.9% (95% CI 3.1-4.7) of patients within 1 year of ankle arthrodesis and in 6.2% (95% CI 5.1-7.2) of patients within 3 years. Obese patients increased odds of nonunion on multivariable analysis (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.0; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, diabetes (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.6; P = .010) and each 1-unit increase in Elixhauser Comorbidity Index scores (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.1-1.2; P < .001) contributed to increased odds of infection after ankle arthrodesis.

Conclusion:

Nonunion and infection following ankle arthrodesis have a 3-year probability of 16% and 6%, respectively. More than one-quarter of patients with nonunion following ankle arthrodesis experience a delay in diagnosis beyond 1 year. The risk of post–ankle arthrodesis nonunion is highest in patients with obesity; the risk of post–ankle arthrodesis infection is highest in patients with diabetes or an elevated Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score.

Level of Evidence:

Level III, prognostic study.