1
|
Burnett CL, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, Cohen D, Klaassen CD, Liebler DC, Marks JG, Peterson LA, Shank RC, Slaga TJ, Snyder PW, Heldreth B. Amended Safety Assessment of Methylisothiazolinone as Used in Cosmetics. Int J Toxicol 2021; 40:5S-19S. [PMID: 34259065 DOI: 10.1177/10915818211015795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety (Panel) reassessed the safety of Methylisothiazolinone, which functions as a preservative in cosmetics. The Panel reviewed relevant animal and human data provided in this safety assessment, and data from the previously published safety assessments of Methylisothiazolinone, and concluded that Methylisothiazolinone is safe for use in rinse-off cosmetic products at concentrations up to 100 ppm (ie, 0.01%) and safe in leave-on cosmetic products when they are formulated to be nonsensitizing, which may be determined based on a quantitative risk assessment or similar methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - David Cohen
- Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety Member
| | | | | | - James G Marks
- Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety Former Member
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Burnett CL, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, Klaassen CD, Liebler DC, Marks JG, Peterson LA, Shank RC, Slaga TJ, Snyder PW, Heldreth B. Amended Safety Assessment of Methylchloroisothiazolinone and Methylisothiazolinone as Used in Cosmetics. Int J Toxicol 2021; 40:20S-33S. [PMID: 34259066 DOI: 10.1177/10915818211016382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety (Panel) reassessed the safety of the mixture Methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/Methylisothiazolinone (MI), which functions as a preservative in cosmetic products. The Panel reviewed relevant animal and human data provided in this safety assessment, and data from the previously published safety assessment of this mixture, and concluded that MCI/MI is safe in cosmetics when formulated to be nonsensitizing, based on the results of a quantitative risk assessment or similar methodology; however, at no point should concentrations exceed 7.5 ppm in leave-on products or 15 ppm in rinse-off products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - James G Marks
- Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety Former Member
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kullberg SA, Voller LM, Warshaw EM. Methylisothiazolinone in "dermatology-recommended" sunscreens: An important mimicker of photoallergic contact dermatitis. PHOTODERMATOLOGY PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY & PHOTOMEDICINE 2021; 37:366-370. [PMID: 33559174 DOI: 10.1111/phpp.12665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sara A Kullberg
- Park Nicollet Contact Dermatitis Clinic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Lindsey M Voller
- Park Nicollet Contact Dermatitis Clinic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Erin M Warshaw
- Park Nicollet Contact Dermatitis Clinic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De La Garza H, Rajanala S, Burdine LK, Maymone MBC, Vashi NA. Reply. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 84:e217. [PMID: 33347876 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Henriette De La Garza
- Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Susruthi Rajanala
- Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lauren K Burdine
- Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mayra B C Maymone
- Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Neelam A Vashi
- Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Felmingham C, Saunders H, Veysey E, Nixon RL. Comment on "How to improve the clinical experience for dermatology patients requiring a genital examination: A randomized trial of deodorizing wipes versus standard of care". J Am Acad Dermatol 2020; 84:e215-e216. [PMID: 33347875 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.11.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helen Saunders
- Dermatology Department, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Dermatology Department, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emma Veysey
- Dermatology Department, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Dermatology Department, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rosemary L Nixon
- Occupational Dermatology Research and Education Centre, Skin Health Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yun T, Cheng P, Qian F, Cheng Y, Lu J, Lv Y, Wang H. Balancing the decomposable behavior and wet tensile mechanical property of cellulose-based wet wipe substrates by the aqueous adhesive. Int J Biol Macromol 2020; 164:1898-1907. [PMID: 32800954 PMCID: PMC7422816 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
With the current global outbreak of novel coronaviruses, the fabrication of decomposable wet wipe with sufficient wet strength to meet daily use is promising but still challenging, especially when renewable cellulose was employed. In this work, a decomposable cellulose-based wet wipe substrate is demonstrated by introducing a synthetic N-vinyl pyrrolidone-glycidyl methacrylate (NVP-GMA) adhesive on the cellulose surface. Experimental results reveal that the NVP-GMA adhesive not only significantly facilitates the chemical bonding between cellulose fibers in the wet state, but also increase the surface wettability and water retention. The as-fabricated cellulose-based wet wipe substrate displays a superb water retention capacity of 1.9 times, an excellent water absorption capacity (completely wetted with 0° water contact angle), and a perfect wet tensile index of 3.32 N.m.g−1. It is far better than state-of-the-art wet toilet wipe on the market (non-woven). The prepared renewable and degradable cellulose-based substrate with excellent mechanical strength has potential application prospects in diverse commercially available products such as sanitary and medical wet wipes. A decomposable wet wipe substrate was prepared from the bio-based materials. Synthetic adhesive enhanced the wet strength of the cellulose sheet. Enhancement of cellulose-based material was achieved under aqueous conditions. As-prepared cellulose substrate balanced the dispersibility and wet strength.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tongtong Yun
- School of Light Industry and Chemical Engineering, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, Liaoning, PR China
| | - Peng Cheng
- School of Light Industry and Chemical Engineering, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, Liaoning, PR China
| | - Fang Qian
- School of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, Liaoning, PR China
| | - Yi Cheng
- School of Light Industry and Chemical Engineering, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, Liaoning, PR China
| | - Jie Lu
- School of Light Industry and Chemical Engineering, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, Liaoning, PR China
| | - Yanna Lv
- School of Light Industry and Chemical Engineering, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, Liaoning, PR China.
| | - Haisong Wang
- School of Light Industry and Chemical Engineering, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, Liaoning, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Allergic Dermatitis to Methylchloroisothiazolinone/Methylisothiazolinone Masquerading as Pinworm Infection. Dermatitis 2019; 30:323-324. [DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
8
|
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergic contact dermatitis commonly occurs on the face. Facial cleansing wipes may be an underrecognized source of allergens. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of potentially allergenic ingredients in facial wet wipes. METHODS Ingredient lists from name brand and generic facial wipes from 4 large retailers were analyzed. RESULTS In the 178 facial wipes examined, a total of 485 ingredients were identified (average, 16.7 ingredients per wipe). Excluding botanicals, the top 15 potentially allergenic ingredients were glycerin (64.0%), fragrance (63.5%), phenoxyethanol (53.9%), citric acid (51.1%), disodium EDTA (44.4%), sorbic acid derivatives (39.3%), tocopherol derivatives (38.8%), polyethylene glycol derivatives (32.6%), glyceryl stearate (31.5%), sodium citrate (29.8%), glucosides (27.5%), cetearyl alcohol (25.8%), propylene glycol (25.3%), sodium benzoate (24.2%), and ceteareth-20 (23.6%)/parabens (23.6%). Of note, methylisothiazolinone (2.2%) and methylchloroisothiazolinone (1.1%) were uncommon. The top potential allergens of botanical origin included Aloe barbadensis (41.0%), chamomile extracts (27.0%), tea extracts (21.3%), Cucumis sativus (20.2%), and Hamamelis virginiana (10.7%). CONCLUSIONS Many potential allergens are present in facial wet wipes, including fragrances, preservatives, botanicals, glucosides, and propylene glycol.
Collapse
|
10
|
Uter W, Werfel T, White IR, Johansen JD. Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2018; 15:ijerph15061108. [PMID: 29844295 PMCID: PMC6025382 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15061108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Revised: 05/20/2018] [Accepted: 05/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Contact allergy is common, affecting 27% of the general population in Europe. Original publications, including case reports, published since 2016 (inclusive) were identified with the aim of collating a full review of current problems in the field. To this end, a literature search employing methods of systematic reviewing was performed in the Medline® and Web of Science™ databases on 28 January 2018, using the search terms (“contact sensitization” or “contact allergy”). Of 446 non-duplicate publications identified by above search, 147 were excluded based on scrutiny of title, abstract and key words. Of the remaining 299 examined in full text, 291 were deemed appropriate for inclusion, and main findings were summarised in topic sections. In conclusion, diverse sources of exposures to chemicals of widely-differing types and structures, continue to induce sensitisation in man and may result in allergic contact dermatitis. Many of the chemicals are “evergreen” but others are “newcomers”. Vigilance and proper investigation (patch testing) are required to detect and inform of the presence of these haptens to which our populations remain exposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Thomas Werfel
- Division of Immunodermatology and Allergy Research, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
| | - Ian R White
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.
| | - Jeanne D Johansen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, National Allergy Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Abstract
Diaper dermatitis (DD) is one of the most common skin conditions that infants suffer from and their caregivers manage in the first months post-birth. As such, questions of effective prevention and treatment of the condition often arise. Nonmedical skincare practices that support healthy skin barrier function can prevent DD manifestation or alleviate the condition in many cases. The usage of barrier emollients and improved diaper technology contributes to keeping moisture and irritants away from an infant's delicate skin. This paper addresses facts behind commonly asked questions from caregivers regarding DD and discusses effective measures to prevent and treat the condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Blume-Peytavi
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science, Berlin, Germany
| | - Varvara Kanti
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
|
14
|
Allergic contact dermatitis in preservatives: current standing and future options. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2017; 17:263-268. [DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|