Are Adverse Events Attributed to Essure Associated With Nickel Sensitization?

Plasma and peritoneal fluid cytokine profiles in patient with Essure® implant: Towards a molecular signature?

OBJECTIVE(S)

Many patients with Essure® implant may experience adverse events related to the device. Although local inflammation does not appear to be the pathophysiological mechanism underlying the symptoms, systemic inflammation could play a role. In the present study, as cytokines are involved in the inflammatory process, we proposed to investigate the profile of circulating and peritoneal cytokines.

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective study, we evaluated the levels of cytokines in peritoneal fluid (PF) as well as in plasma sample from three different groups: Essure® group, endometriosis group (known to be associated with immune dysregulation), and control group.

RESULTS

There were 60 symptomatic patients with Essure® device, 30 patients with endometriosis and a control group of 30 patients. The PF levels of Interleukin-10 (IL-10), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) were statistically higher in endometriosis group than in Essure® group and control group. The plasma level of MCP-1 was higher in Essure® group than in endometriosis group and control group. The plasma level of TNF-α was higher in Essure® group than in control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The chemokine MCP-1 as well as the pro-inflammatory TNF-α, are known to be increased in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome. Since patients with Essure® may exhibit symptoms similar to fibromyalgia, MCP-1 and TNF-α may be relevant markers in symptomatic patients with Essure®. Because of the lack of longitudinal data (no evaluation of postoperative cytokine profile and no assessment of the level of clinical improvement), other studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results.

Clinical and histopathological correlations in symptomatic patients with salpingectomy for Essure® implant removal: a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

Many concerns have been raised about adverse effects related to Essure® device. Several pathophysiological hypotheses have been proposed including allergic reactions, Autoimmune/Autoinflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants, galvanic corrosion with release of heavy metals and inflammation. In the present study, we aimed to focus on inflammation process by performing a histopathological evaluation of Fallopian tubes in symptomatic patients with Essure® removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study with identification of the type of inflammatory response and characterisation of inflammatory cells in the surrounding tubal tissue around the Essure® (STTE) and at distance from the implant. Histopathological and clinical correlations were also investigated.

RESULTS

In the STTE from 47 cases, acute inflammation was observed in 3/47 (6.4%) cases. Chronic inflammation with lymphocytes (42.5%, 20/47) was associated with a significant higher pre-operative pain score (p = .03). Fibrosis was noted in 43/47 (91.5%) cases. Fibrosis without lymphocytes (51.1%, 24/47) was statistically associated with significant reduced pain (p = .04). At distance from the Essure® implant, only chronic inflammation with lymphocytes was present in 10/47 (21.7%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammation response do not seem to be enough to explain all the Essure-related adverse outcomes, suggesting the involvement of other biological mechanisms.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03281564.

The plasticity of biocompatibility

Biocompatibility concerns the phenomena that occur within the interactions between biomaterials and human patients, which ultimately control the performance of many facets of medical technology. It involves aspects of materials science, many different forms of engineering and nanotechnology, chemistry, biophysics, molecular and cellular biology, immunology, pathology and a myriad of clinical applications. It is not surprising that an overarching framework of mechanisms of biocompatibility has been difficult to elucidate and validate. This essay discusses one fundamental reason for this; we have tended to consider biocompatibility pathways as essentially linear sequences of events which follow well-understood processes of materials science and biology. The reality, however, is that the pathways may involve a great deal of plasticity, in which many additional idiosyncratic factors, including those of genetic, epigenetic and viral origin, exert influence, as do complex mechanical, physical and pharmacological variables. Plasticity is an inherent core feature of the performance of synthetic materials; here we follow the more recent biological applications of plasticity concepts into the sphere of biocompatibility pathways. A straightforward linear pathway may result in successful outcomes for many patients; we may describe this in terms of classic biocompatibility pathways. In other situations, which usually command much more attention because of their unsuccessful outcomes, these plasticity-driven processes follow alternative biocompatibility pathways; often, the variability in outcomes with identical technologies is due to biological plasticity rather than material or device deficiency.

Release of metal elements from the Essure implant: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE(S)

The causal mechanistic relationships between Essure® and adverse effects are unclear, but corrosion in the in-vivo environment with release of metal ions may be suspected. Here we evaluated the concentrations of nickel (Ni), chromium (Cr) and tin (Sn) in the peritoneal fluid (PF) and in the fallopian tube (FT) during laparoscopic Essure® removal compared to a control group.

STUDY DESIGN

Ni, Cr and Sn concentrations were determined in the PF and FT from two groups(group A: symptomatic patients with Essure®) vs group B (control group without Essure®) by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry analysis. Correlation between metal elements concentrations and reported pre-operative symptoms was also investigated.

RESULTS

There were 131 patients in group A vs 92 control patients in group B. The concentrations of Cr and Ni in PF between both groups were significantly different (p < 0.0001) while there was no statistical difference for Sn (p = 0.58). There was also a significantly higher concentration in the FT for the 3 metal elements in group A than in group B (p < 0.0001). There were differential dynamics of the levels of metal elements based on the length of time between the placement and removal of Essure®.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a chronic exposure to metal elements in symptomatic patients with Essure® raising the question of the relationship between adverse effects and these potential toxic metals.

Severe systemic delayed dermatitis in a patient with nickel-titanium sterilization microinserts perforating the uterus

We report a case of severe systemic delayed dermatitis in a patient with nickel-titanium sterilization microinserts placement complicated by uterine perforation and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) exposure. We hypothesize that delayed dermatitis may be caused by the exposure of PET fibers in this patient with underlying autoimmune disorder. Further research on the use of PET and the potential of systemic dermatologic reactions when exposure occurs is needed, especially when considering the inclusion of PET in future implant device development.