A retrospective comparison of COVID-19 and seasonal influenza mortality and outcomes in the ICUs of a French university hospital

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Intensive Care Units Between Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Patients with Influenza: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Severe infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or influenza virus can cause patients to be admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). It is necessary to understand the differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes between these two types of critically ill patients.

METHODS

We searched Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science for articles and performed a meta-analysis using Stata 14.0 with a random-effects model. This paper was written in strict accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty-five articles involving 131,692 ICU patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and 30,286 ICU patients with influenza were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with influenza patients, COVID-19 patients were more likely to be male (odds ratio (OR) = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.54-1.99) and older (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.29). In terms of laboratory test results, COVID-19 patients had higher lymphocyte (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17-0.59) and platelet counts (SMD = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.29-0.75) but lower creatinine (SMD = -0.29, 95% CI: -0.55-0.03) and procalcitonin levels (SMD = -0.78, 95% CI: -1.11-0.46). Diabetes (SMD = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.08-1.48) and hypertension (SMD = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.05-1.60) were more prevalent in COVID-19 patients, while influenza patients were more likely to have cancer (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.44-0.62), cirrhosis (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.44-0.62), immunodepression (OR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.25-0.58), and chronic pulmonary diseases (OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.24-0.52). We also found that patients with COVID-19 had longer ICU stays (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05-0.34), were more likely to develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR = 4.90, 95% CI: 2.77-8.64), and had higher mortality (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.17-1.55).

CONCLUSIONS

There are some differences in the basic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory test results and complications between ICU patients with COVID-19 and ICU patients with influenza. Critically ill patients with COVID-19 often require more medical resources and have worse clinical outcomes. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023452238.

Impact of COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Hospitalized Pneumonia on Longer-Term Cardiovascular Mortality in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study From Scotland

OBJECTIVE

In this study we examine whether hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia increases long-term cardiovascular mortality more than other hospitalized pneumonias in people with type 2 diabetes and aim to quantify the relative cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality risks associated with COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 pneumonia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

With use of the SCI-Diabetes register, two cohorts were identified: individuals with type 2 diabetes in 2016 and at the 2020 pandemic onset. Hospital and death records were linked for determination of pneumonia exposure and CVD deaths. Poisson regression estimated rate ratios (RRs) for CVD death associated with both pneumonia types, with adjustment for confounders. Median follow-up durations were 1,461 days (2016 cohort) and 700 days (2020 cohort).

RESULTS

The adjusted RR for CVD death following non-COVID-19 pneumonia was 5.51 (95% CI 5.31-5.71) prepandemic and 7.3 (6.86-7.76) during the pandemic. For COVID-19 pneumonia, the RR was 9.13 (8.55-9.75). Beyond 30 days post pneumonia, the RRs converged, to 4.24 (3.90-4.60) for non-COVID-19 and 3.35 (3.00-3.74) for COVID-19 pneumonia, consistent even with exclusion of prior CVD cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalized pneumonia, irrespective of causal agent, marks an increased risk for CVD death immediately and over the long-term. COVID-19 pneumonia poses a higher CVD death risk than other pneumonias in the short-term, but this distinction diminishes over time. These insights underscore the need for including pneumonia in CVD risk assessments, with particular attention to the acute impact of COVID-19 pneumonia.

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Using Propensity Score Matching: Coronavirus Disease 2019 vs. Seasonal Influenza in Korea

BACKGROUND

The advent of the omicron variant and the formulation of diverse therapeutic strategies marked a new epoch in the realm of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Studies have compared the clinical outcomes between COVID-19 and seasonal influenza, but such studies were conducted during the early stages of the pandemic when effective treatment strategies had not yet been developed, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Therefore, an updated evaluation of the comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between COVID-19 and seasonal influenza is requisite.

METHODS

This study used data from the severe acute respiratory infection surveillance system of South Korea. We extracted data for influenza patients who were infected between 2018 and 2019 and COVID-19 patients who were infected in 2021 (pre-omicron period) and 2022 (omicron period). Comparisons of outcomes were conducted among the pre-omicron, omicron, and influenza cohorts utilizing propensity score matching. The adjusted covariates in the propensity score matching included age, sex, smoking, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

The study incorporated 1,227 patients in the pre-omicron cohort, 1,948 patients in the omicron cohort, and 920 patients in the influenza cohort. Following propensity score matching, 491 patients were included in each respective group. Clinical presentations exhibited similarities between the pre-omicron and omicron cohorts; however, COVID-19 patients demonstrated a higher prevalence of dyspnea and pulmonary infiltrates compared to their influenza counterparts. Both COVID-19 groups exhibited higher in-hospital mortality and longer hospital length of stay than the influenza group. The omicron group showed no significant improvement in clinical outcomes compared to the pre-omicron group.

CONCLUSION

The omicron group did not demonstrate better clinical outcomes than the pre-omicron group, and exhibited significant disease severity compared to the influenza group. Considering the likely persistence of COVID-19 infections, it is imperative to sustain comprehensive studies and ongoing policy support for the virus to enhance the prognosis for individuals affected by COVID-19.

Comparison of mortality and outcomes of four respiratory viruses in the intensive care unit: a multicenter retrospective study

This retrospective study aimed to compare the mortality and burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV group), SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19 group), non-H1N1 (Seasonal influenza group) and H1N1 influenza (H1N1 group) in adult patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with respiratory failure. A total of 807 patients were included. Mortality was compared between the four following groups: RSV, COVID-19, seasonal influenza, and H1N1 groups. Patients in the RSV group had significantly more comorbidities than the other patients. At admission, patients in the COVID-19 group were significantly less severe than the others according to the simplified acute physiology score-2 (SAPS-II) and sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores. Using competing risk regression, COVID-19 (sHR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.10; 2.36) and H1N1 (sHR = 1.87; 95% CI 1.20; 2.93) were associated with a statistically significant higher mortality while seasonal influenza was not (sHR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.65; 1.31), when compared to RSV. Despite occurring in more severe patients, RSV and seasonal influenza group appear to be associated with a more favorable outcome than COVID-19 and H1N1 groups.

Comparing COVID-19 and influenza: Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, outcomes and mortality in the ICU

RATIONALE

Several authors have compared COVID-19 infection with influenza in the ICU.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the baseline clinical profiles, care procedures, and mortality outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit, categorized by infection status (Influenza vs. COVID-19).

METHODS

Retrospective observational study. Data were extracted from the Toulouse University Hospital from March 2014 to March 2021. To compare survival curves, we plotted the survival at Day-90 using the Kaplan-Meier curve and conducted a log-rank test. Additionally, we performed propensity score matching to adjust for confounding factors between the COVID-19 and influenza groups. Furthermore, we use the CART model for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 363 patients admitted to the ICU due to severe viral pneumonia: 152 patients (41.9 %) with influenza and 211 patients (58.1 %) with COVID-19. COVID-19 patients exhibited a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, whereas influenza patients had significantly higher severity scores (SOFA: 10 [6-12] vs. 6 [3-9], p<0.01 and SAPS II: 51 [35-67] vs. 37 [29-50], p<0.001). Overall mortality rates were comparable between the two groups (27.6 % (n = 42) in the influenza group vs. 21.8 % (n = 46) in the COVID-19 group, p=NS). Mechanical ventilation was more commonly employed in the influenza group (76.3 % (n = 116) vs. 59.7 % (n = 126), p<0.001); however, COVID-19 patients required longer durations of mechanical ventilation (18 [9-29] days vs. 13 [5-24] days, p<0.006) and longer hospital stays (23 [13-34] days vs. 18.5 [9-34.5] days, p = 0.009). The CART analysis revealed that the use of extra renal replacement therapy was the most influential prognostic factor in the influenza group, while the PaO2/FiO2-PEEP ratio played a significant role in the COVID-19 group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differences in clinical presentation and prognostic factors, the mortality rates at 90 days, after adjusting for confounding factors, were similar between COVID-19 and influenza patients.

Reduced Reliability of Procalcitonin (PCT) as a Biomarker of Bacterial Superinfection: Concerns about PCT-Driven Antibiotic Stewardship in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients-Results from a Retrospective Observational Study in Intensive Care Units

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess whether procalcitonin levels is a diagnostic tool capable of accurately identifying sepsis and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) even in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective, observational study, all critically ill COVID-19 patients who survived for ≥2 days in a single university hospital and had at least one serum procalcitonin (PCT) value and associated blood culture and/or culture from a lower respiratory tract specimen available were eligible for the study.

RESULTS

Over the research period, 184 patients were recruited; 67 VAP/BSI occurred, with an incidence rate of 21.82 episodes of VAP/BSI (95% CI: 17.18-27.73) per 1000 patient-days among patients who were included. At the time of a positive microbiological culture, an average PCT level of 1.25-3.2 ng/mL was found. Moreover, also in subjects without positive cultures, PCT was altered in 21.7% of determinations, with an average value of 1.04-5.5 ng/mL. Both PCT and PCT-72 h were not linked to a diagnosis of VAP/BSI in COVID-19 patients, according to the multivariable GEE models (aOR 1.13, 95% CI 0.51-2.52 for PCT; aOR 1.32, 95% CI 0.66-2.64 for PCT-72 h).

CONCLUSION

Elevated PCT levels might not always indicate bacterial superinfections or coinfections in a severe COVID-19 setting.

Moderate to severe ARDS: COVID-19 patients compared to influenza patients for ventilator parameters and mortality

Background

This study aimed to compare ventilatory parameters recorded the first days of ARDS, and mortality at day 60 between COVID-19 and influenza ARDS patients with PaO2/FiO2≤150 mmHg.

Methods

We compared 244 COVID-19 ARDS patients with 106 influenza ARDS patients. Driving pressure (DP), respiratory system compliance (CRs), ventilator ratio (VR), corrected minute ventilation (VEcorr), and surrogate of mechanical power [index=(4×DP)+respiratory rate] were calculated from day1 to day 5 of ARDS. A propensity score analysis and a principal component analysis (PCA) were performed.

Results

On day 1 of ARDS, COVID-19 patients had significantly higher PaO2/FiO2ratio (median [IQR], 97 mmHg [79–129]versus83 [62.2–114]), p=0.001), and lower DP (13 cmH20 [11–16.0]versus14 [12.0–16.7], p=0.01), VR (2.08 [1.73–2.49versus2.52 [1.97–3.03], p<0.001), VEcorr (12.7 L·mn−1[10.2–14.9]versus14.9 [11.6–18.6], p<0.001), index (80 [70–89]versus84 [75–94], p=0.004). PCA demonstrated an important overlap of ventilatory parameters recorded on day 1 between the two groups. From day 1 to day 5 repeated values of PaO2/FiO2ratio, PaCO2, VR and VEcorr differed significantly between influenza and COVID-19 patients in the unmatched and matched populations. Mortality at day 60 did not differ significantly after matching (29%versus21.7%, p=0.43).

Conclusions

Ventilation was more impaired in influenza than in COVID-19 ARDS patients the first day of ARDS with important overlap of values. However, mortality at day 60 did not differ significantly in the matched population.

Effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection and pandemic period on healthcare-associated infections acquired in intensive care units

OBJECTIVES

To compare the occurrence of healthcare-associated infections acquired in intensive care units (HAI-ICUs) in France among patients with COVID-19 and those without it in 2020 and the latter with that in patients before the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Multicentre HAI-ICU surveillance network (REA-REZO) data were used to identify 3 groups: 2019 patients (2019Control), a COVID-19 group (2020Cov), and a non-COVID-19 group (2020NonCov). The primary outcome was the occurrence of HAI-ICU (ventilator-associated pneumonia [VAP], bloodstream infections [BSIs], catheter-related bacteraemia). Standardized infection ratios of VAP were calculated for each quarter in 2020 and compared with those in 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 30 105 patients were included in 2020: 23 798 in the 2020NonCov group, 4465 in 2020Cov group, and 39 635 patients in the 2019Control group. The frequency of VAP was strikingly greater in the 2020Cov group: 35.6 (33.4-37.8) episodes/1000 days of mechanical ventilation versus 18.4 (17.6-19.2) in the 2020NonCov group. VAP standardized infection ratio was high in 2020 patients, particularly during the 2 quarters corresponding to the 2 waves. BSI/1000 days were more frequent in the 2020Cov group (6.4% [6.4-6.4%] vs. 3.9% [3.8-3.9%] in the 2020NonCov group). VAP and BSI were also more frequent in the 2020NonCov group than in the 2019Control group. The microbial epidemiology was only slightly different.

DISCUSSION

The data presented here indicate that HAI-ICUs were more frequent during the COVID-19 period, whether the patients were admitted for COVID-19 or, to a lesser extent, for another cause. This implies that managing patients with severe disease in a pandemic context carries risks for all patients.