Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Bisoprolol in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Impact of CYP2D6*2A, CYP2D6*4 and CYP3A5*3 genetic polymorphisms on Bisoprolol peak concentration and clinical response in acute coronary syndrome patients

AIMS

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents a major cause of death. Bisoprolol is commonly used in the management of ACS. This study aims to investigate the impact of CYP2D6*2A, CYP2D6*4 and CYP3A5*3 genetic polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics and clinical response of bisoprolol in ACS patients.

METHODS

This is an open-label cohort study that included 127 ACS patients and studied the effect of CYP3A5*3, CYP2D6*2A and CYP2D6*4 genotyping using real-time polymerase chain reaction on steady state bisoprolol plasma peak concentration analysed by high performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detector.

RESULTS

Regarding CYP3A5*3, the mean peak bisoprolol concentration for CC, CT and TT genotypes were 4.25 ± 1.20, 3.93 ± 1.10 and 1.79 ± 0.69 ng/mL, respectively (P < .001). Higher systolic (126 ± 5.47 mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (82 ± 2.73 mmHg) and heart rate (97.80 ± 3.03 beats/min) were also observed in CYP3A5*3 TT carriers (P < .05). In CYP2D6*2A, the peak concentration of bisoprolol was lower in CC carriers (3.54 ± 1 ng/mL) compared to GG (4.38 ± 1.25 ng/mL) and GC carriers (4.07 ± 1.29 ng/mL, P = .019). In CYP2D6*4, the mean bisoprolol peak concentration in CC carriers was 3.98 ± 1.31 ng/mL, which was lower than T allele carriers (4.5 ± 0.8, P = .02). No differences in heart rate, systolic, diastolic blood pressure or bisoprolol dose were observed among CYP2D6*2A or CYP2D6*4 variants. Smokers exhibited lower bisoprolol peak concentration (3.96 ± 1.2 ng/mL) compared to nonsmokers (4.55 ± 1.34 ng/mL, P = .037).

CONCLUSION

There is an association between CYP3A5*3, CYP2D6*4, CYP2D6*2A variants and bisoprolol peak concentration, which may serve as a guide in the future in choosing the optimum dose of bisoprolol in ACS patients.

Chromosomal Region 11p14.1 is Associated with Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bisoprolol

Purpose

Bisoprolol is a widely used beta-blocker in patients with cardiovascular diseases. As with other beta-blockers, there is variability in response to bisoprolol, but the underlying reasons for this have not been clearly elucidated. Our aim was to investigate genetic factors that affect bisoprolol pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), and potentially the clinical outcomes.

Patients and Methods

Patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome were recruited prospectively on admission to hospital and followed up for up to 2 years. Patients from this cohort who were on treatment with bisoprolol, at any dose, had bisoprolol adherence data and a plasma sample, one month after discharge from index hospitalisation were included in the study. Individual bisoprolol clearance values were estimated using population pharmacokinetic modeling. Genome-wide association analysis after genotyping was undertaken using an Illumina HumanOmniExpressExome-8 v1.0 BeadChip array, while CYP2D6 copy number variations were determined by PCR techniques and phenotypes for CYP2D6 and CYP3A were inferred from the genotype. GWAS significant SNPs were analysed for heart rate response to bisoprolol in an independent cohort of hypertensive subjects.

Results

Six hundred twenty-two patients on bisoprolol underwent both PK and genome wide analysis. The mean (IQR) of the estimated clearance in this population was 13.6 (10.0-18.0) L/h. Bisoprolol clearance was associated with rs11029955 (p=7.17×10-9) mapped to the region of coiled-coil domain containing 34 region (CCDC34) on chromosome 11, and with rs116702638 (p=2.54×10-8). Each copy of the minor allele of rs11029955 was associated with 2.2 L/h increase in clearance. In an independent cohort of hypertensive subjects, rs11029955 was associated with 24-hour heart rate response to 4-week treatment with bisoprolol (p= 9.3×10-5), but not with rs116702638.

Conclusion

A novel locus on the chromosomal region 11p14.1 was associated with bisoprolol clearance in a real-world cohort of patients and was validated in independent cohort with a pharmacodynamic association.

Association Between Use of Pharmacokinetic-Interacting Drugs and Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants: Nested Case-Control Study

Concomitant use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and medications with inhibition/induction effect on P-gp/CYP3A might increase risk of bleeding/treatment failure, respectively. We designed a nested case-control study within a Clalit cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a cohort of patients with venous thromboembolism, new users of a DOAC (January 1, 2010 to August 24, 2020). Propensity scores were constructed from demographic/clinical characteristics, and medications at cohort entry. Each case of: (i) serious bleeding event; (ii) stroke/systemic emboli (SE) in patients with AF; (iii) recurrent thromboembolism in patients with thromboembolism, was matched by age, sex, length of follow-up, year of cohort entry, DOAC type, and DOAC indication, to up to 20 controls. Within 89,284 patients with AF and venous thromboembolism and 126,302 patient-years of follow-up, there were 1,587 serious bleeding events. Risk of serious bleeding increased in association with concurrent prescription of P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors. Specifically, higher bleeding risk was associated with dabigatran-verapamil, rivaroxaban-verapamil, and rivaroxaban-amiodarone concurrent prescriptions: adjusted odds ratios (ORs) 2.29 (1.13-4.60), 2.18 (1.07-4.40), and 1.68 (1.14-2.49), respectively. There were 1,116 events of stroke/SE, in 79,302 DOAC-treated patients with AF and 118,124 patient-years of follow-up. Concomitant use of phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, or levetiracetam was associated with risk for stroke/SE: adjusted OR 2.18 (1.55-3.10). Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism could not be assessed due to the low number of cases. Concurrent prescriptions of dabigatran or rivaroxaban with verapamil, and of rivaroxaban with amiodarone, are associated with increased risk for serious bleeding. Higher risk for stroke/SE in patients with AF is associated with concurrent prescriptions of DOACs with phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, or levetiracetam.

Therapeutic Properties of Highly Selective β-blockers With or Without Additional Vasodilator Properties: Focus on Bisoprolol and Nebivolol in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

Bisoprolol and nebivolol are highly selective β₁-adrenoceptor antagonists, with clinical indications in many countries within the management of heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), ischaemic heart disease (IHD), and hypertension. Nebivolol has additional vasodilator actions, related to enhanced release of NO in the vascular wall. In principle, this additional mechanism compared with bisoprolol might lead to more potent vasodilatation, which in turn might influence the effectiveness of nebivolol in the management of HFrEF, IHD and hypertension. In this article, we review the therapeutic properties of bisoprolol and nebivolol, as representatives of “second generation” and “third generation” β-blockers, respectively. Although head-to-head trials are largely lacking, there is no clear indication from published studies of an additional effect of nebivolol on clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF or the magnitude of reductions of BP in patients with hypertension.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of bisoprolol in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension

PURPOSE

Given that it has been reported that type 2 diabetes mellitus may affect the pharmacokinetics of a large number of drugs and that there are still no published population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) analyses in routinely treated patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus as comorbid condition, the aim of this study was to determine PK variability of bisoprolol in 70 Serbian patients using the PopPK approach.

METHODS

PopPK analysis was conducted using a nonlinear mixed effects model (NONMEM), version 7.3.0 (Icon Development Solutions). In our patients, a total daily dose of bisoprolol ranged from 1.25 to 10 mg. The drug was administrated orally as a single daily dose or in two divided doses per day.

RESULTS

A wide range of the drug concentrations were noted (1-103 ng/mL) in the population consisted of the adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. From a total of 21 separately assessed covariates, our results indicated that only creatinine clearance could have a potential impact on the variability of the clearance of bisoprolol.

CONCLUSION

Routine assessment of renal function should be carried out before the initiation of treatment with bisoprolol in order to individualize the dose and to prevent possible accumulation and adverse drug reactions.

Bisoprolol, Known to Be a Selective β₁-Receptor Antagonist, Differentially but Directly Suppresses IK(M) and IK(erg) in Pituitary Cells and Hippocampal Neurons

Bisoprolol (BIS) is a selective antagonist of β₁ adrenergic receptors. We examined the effects of BIS on M-type K⁺ currents (IK(M)) or erg-mediated K⁺ currents (IK(erg)) in pituitary GH3, R1220 cells, and hippocampal mHippoE-14 cells. As GH₃ cells were exposed to BIS, amplitude of IK(M) was suppressed with an IC50 value of 1.21 μM. The BIS-induced suppression of IK(M) amplitude was not affected by addition of isoproterenol or ractopamine, but attenuated by flupirtine or ivabradine. In cell-attached current, BIS decreased the open probability of M-type K⁺ (KM) channels, along with decreased mean opening time of the channel. BIS decreased IK(erg) amplitude with an IC50 value of 6.42 μM. Further addition of PD-118057 attenuated BIS-mediated inhibition of IK(erg). Under current-clamp conditions, BIS depolarization increased the firing of spontaneous action potentials in GH₃ cells; addition of flupirtine, but not ractopamine, reversed BIS-induced firing rate. In R1220 cells, BIS suppressed IK(M); subsequent application of ML-213(Kv7.2 channel activator) reversed BIS-induced suppression of the current. In hippocampal mHippoE-14 neurons, BIS inhibited IK(M) to a greater extent compared to its depressant effect on IK(erg). This demonstrated that in pituitary cells and hippocampal neurons the presence of BIS is capable of directly and differentially suppressing IK(M) and IK(erg), despite its antagonism of β₁-adrenergic receptors.