1
|
Natarajan P, Delanerolle G, Dobson L, Xu C, Zeng Y, Yu X, Marston K, Phan T, Choi F, Barzilova V, Powell SG, Wyatt J, Taylor S, Shi JQ, Hapangama DK. Surgical Treatment for Endometrial Cancer, Hysterectomy Performed via Minimally Invasive Routes Compared with Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1860. [PMID: 38791939 PMCID: PMC11119247 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy via minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has emerged as the standard of care for early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). Prior systematic reviews and meta-analyses have focused on outcomes reported solely from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), overlooking valuable data from non-randomised studies. This inaugural systematic review and network meta-analysis comprehensively compares clinical and oncological outcomes between MIS and open surgery for early-stage EC, incorporating evidence from randomised and non-randomised studies. Methods: This study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020186959). All original research of any experimental design reporting clinical and oncological outcomes of surgical treatment for endometrial cancer was included. Study selection was restricted to English-language peer-reviewed journal articles published 1 January 1995-31 December 2021. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 99 studies were included in the network meta-analysis, comprising 181,716 women and 14 outcomes. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery demonstrated reduced blood loss and length of hospital stay but increased operating time. Compared with laparoscopic surgery, robotic-assisted surgery was associated with a significant reduction in ileus (OR = 0.40, 95% CrI: 0.17-0.87) and total intra-operative complications (OR = 0.38, 95% CrI: 0.17-0.75) as well as a higher disease-free survival (OR = 2.45, 95% CrI: 1.04-6.34). Conclusions: For treating early endometrial cancer, minimal-access surgery via robotic-assisted or laparoscopic techniques appears safer and more efficacious than open surgery. Robotic-assisted surgery is associated with fewer complications and favourable oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Purushothaman Natarajan
- Department of Women’s & Children’s Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
- Liverpool Women’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
| | - Gayathri Delanerolle
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Vincent Drive, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK
| | - Lucy Dobson
- Department of Women’s & Children’s Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
- Liverpool Women’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
| | - Cong Xu
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
| | - Yutian Zeng
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
| | - Xuan Yu
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
| | - Kathleen Marston
- Department of Women’s & Children’s Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
| | - Thuan Phan
- Department of Women’s & Children’s Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
| | - Fiona Choi
- Department of Women’s & Children’s Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
- Liverpool Women’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
| | - Vanya Barzilova
- Department of Women’s & Children’s Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
| | - Simon G. Powell
- Department of Women’s & Children’s Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
| | - James Wyatt
- Department of Women’s & Children’s Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
| | - Sian Taylor
- Liverpool Women’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
| | - Jian Qing Shi
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
- National Center for Applied Mathematics Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518038, China
| | - Dharani K. Hapangama
- Department of Women’s & Children’s Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
- Liverpool Women’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stuart CM, Wojcik BM, Gergen AK, Wilkinson DA, Helmkamp LJ, Volker EE, Mitchell JD, Weyant MJ, Meguid RA, Scott CD. A comparison of short-term outcomes following robotic-assisted vs. open transthoracic diaphragm plication. J Robot Surg 2023:10.1007/s11701-023-01585-z. [PMID: 37071233 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01585-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
Diaphragm paralysis and eventration are rare conditions in adults. Symptomatic patients may benefit from surgical plication of the elevated hemidiaphragm. The objective of this study was to compare short-term outcomes and length of stay following robotic-assisted vs. open diaphragm plication. A multicenter retrospective study was conducted that identified patients undergoing unilateral hemidiaphragm plication from 5/2008 to 12/2020. The first RATS plication was performed in 11/2018. Electronic medical records were reviewed, and outcomes were compared between RATS and open approach. One hundred patients underwent diaphragm plication, including thirty-nine (39.0%) RATS and sixty-one (61.0%) open cases. Patients undergoing RATS diaphragm plication were older (64 years vs. 55 years, p = 0.01) and carried a higher burden of comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index: 2.0 vs. 1.0, p = 0.02). The RATS group had longer median operative times (146 min vs. 99 min, p < 0.01), but shorter median hospital length of stays (3.0 days vs. 6.0 days, p < 0.01). There was a non-significant trend toward a decreased rate of 30-day postoperative complications (20.5% RATS vs. 32.8% open, p = 0.18) and 30-day unplanned readmissions (7.7% RATS vs. 9.8% open, p > 0.99). RATS is a technically feasible and safe option for performing diaphragm plications. This approach increases the surgical candidacy of older patients with a higher burden of comorbid disease without increasing complication rates, while reducing length of hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M Stuart
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Avenue #6117, CO, 80045, Aurora, USA.
| | - Brandon M Wojcik
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Munson Medical Center, Traverse City, MI, USA
| | - Anna K Gergen
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Avenue #6117, CO, 80045, Aurora, USA
| | - Daniel A Wilkinson
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Laura J Helmkamp
- Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research & Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ellen E Volker
- Division of Pulmonology, National Jewish Hospital, Denver, CO, USA
- Division of Pulmonology, St. Joseph Hospital, Denver, CO, USA
| | - John D Mitchell
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Avenue #6117, CO, 80045, Aurora, USA
- Division of Specialty Services, National Jewish Hospital, Denver, CO, USA
- Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Hospital, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Michael J Weyant
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Robert A Meguid
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Avenue #6117, CO, 80045, Aurora, USA
- Division of Specialty Services, National Jewish Hospital, Denver, CO, USA
- Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Hospital, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Christopher D Scott
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prognosis and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Surgery on Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma: Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE 2022; 2022:9384134. [PMID: 36238475 PMCID: PMC9553337 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9384134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective The prognosis and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery (LPS) and open surgery or robotic surgery (RS) on endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients were compared. Methods Data as of May 2021 were retrieved from databases like PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The study involved randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, or case-control studies for comparing the effects of LPS and open surgery or robotic surgery (RS) on EC treatment. The primary outcomes included duration of operation, blood loss, length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes included 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate/disease-free survival (DFS) rate and 3-year overall survival (OS) rate. Results A total of 24 studies were involved, and all of them were cohort studies except 1 RCT and 1 case-control study. There was no significant difference in duration of operation between LPS and open surgery (MD = −0.06, 95% CI: -0.37 to 0.25) or RS (MD = −0.15, 95% CI: -1.27 to 0.96). In comparison with the open surgery, LPS remarkably reduced blood loss (MD = −0.43, 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.29), LOS (MD = −0.71, 95% CI: -0.92 to -0.50), and the complication occurrence rate (RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.95). However, LPS and RS saw no difference in blood loss (MD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.77 to 0.79). Besides, in comparison with RS, LPS prominently shortened the LOS (MD = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.40) but increased the complication occurrence rate (RR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.57 to 1.92). In contrast to open surgery or RS, LPS saw no difference in occurrence rate (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.01; RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.53), 3-year PFS/DFS (RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.09; RR = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.96), and 3-year OS (RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.91 to 1.04; RR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.91 to 1.60). Conclusion In sum, LPS was better than open surgery, which manifested in the aspects of less blood loss, shorter LOS, and fewer complications. LPS, therefore, was the most suitable option for EC patients. Nevertheless, LPS had no advantage over RS, and sufficient prospective RCTs are needed to further confirm its strengths.
Collapse
|
4
|
Concin N, Planchamp F, Abu-Rustum NR, Ataseven B, Cibula D, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Knapp P, Marth C, Morice P, Querleu D, Sehouli J, Stepanyan A, Taskiran C, Vergote I, Wimberger P, Zapardiel I, Persson J. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1508-1529. [PMID: 34795020 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of surgical care as a crucial component of a comprehensive multi-disciplinary management improves outcomes in patients with endometrial carcinoma, notably helping to avoid suboptimal surgical treatment. Quality indicators (QIs) enable healthcare professionals to measure their clinical management with regard to ideal standards of care. OBJECTIVE In order to complete its set of QIs for the surgical management of gynecological cancers, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) initiated the development of QIs for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS QIs were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for the identification of potential QIs and documentation of the scientific evidence, two consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians and patient representatives. QIs were defined using a structured format comprising metrics specifications, and targets. A scoring system was then developed to ensure applicability and feasibility of a future ESGO accreditation process based on these QIs for endometrial carcinoma surgery and support any institutional or governmental quality assurance programs. RESULTS Twenty-nine structural, process and outcome indicators were defined. QIs 1-5 are general indicators related to center case load, training, experience of the surgeon, structured multi-disciplinarity of the team and active participation in clinical research. QIs 6 and 7 are related to the adequate pre-operative investigations. QIs 8-22 are related to peri-operative standards of care. QI 23 is related to molecular markers for endometrial carcinoma diagnosis and as determinants for treatment decisions. QI 24 addresses the compliance of management of patients after primary surgical treatment with the standards of care. QIs 25-29 highlight the need for a systematic assessment of surgical morbidity and oncologic outcome as well as standardized and comprehensive documentation of surgical and pathological elements. Each QI was associated with a score. An assessment form including a scoring system was built as basis for ESGO accreditation of centers for endometrial cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Innsbruck Medical Univeristy, Innsbruck, Austria .,Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial Sloann Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Pawel Knapp
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Oncology Center of Bialystok, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospitals Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Alsace, France
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universitätzu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Artem Stepanyan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Nairi Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, VKV American Hospital, Istambul, Turkey
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jan Persson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Presence of Glandular Cells at the Preoperative Cervical Cytology and Local Recurrence in Endometrial Cancer. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2021; 39:522-528. [PMID: 31651558 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
We investigated the correlation between glandular cells (GC) detected at preoperative cervical-smear and the histologic findings and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer (EC). We retrospectively analyzed data of all consecutive EC patients who underwent surgery between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2012 with preoperative cervical smear performed within 3 mo from the EC diagnosis. Basic descriptive, logistic regression and artificial neural network analyses were used. Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox hazard models. The study included 229 (89%) and 29 (11%) patients with normal cytology (control group) and GC (GC group), respectively. A higher proportion of elderly patients with nonendometrioid and FIGO grade 3 EC was observed in the GC group compared with the control group (P<0.05). No differences in 5-yr disease-free survival and overall survival were observed. However, patients in the GC group experienced a higher local recurrence rate (hazard ratio: 7.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.7-34.2; P=0.008). We observed that age, body mass index, cervical stromal invasion, vaginal brachytherapy, and GC influenced the risk for developing local recurrence. However, at the multivariable analysis, only cervical stromal invasion (odds ratio: 1.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.4; P=0.02) and GC (odds ratio: 1.07; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.14; P=0.03) correlated with the increased risk. In addition, the results of an artificial neural network analysis reported that the most critical predictor of local failure was cervical stromal invasion (importance: 0.352) followed by GC (importance: 0.194). These results suggest that cervical stromal invasion and presence of GC at the preoperative cervical smear might predict the occurrence of local recurrence in EC.
Collapse
|
6
|
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann J, Bosse T, Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Martin AG, Lax S, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice P, Nout RA, O'Donnell D, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza A, Taylor A, Westermann A, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Creutzberg CL. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2021; 154:327-353. [PMID: 33712263 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria; Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany.
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, CIBERONC, Irblleida, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Idibell, Spain
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, UK
| | | | - Sigurd Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II, Austria; School of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Maria Rosaria Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Anneke Westermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TU Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan and University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy
| | | | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Concin N, Creutzberg CL, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann JA, Bosse T, Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, González-Martín A, Lax SF, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice P, Nout RA, O'Donnell DE, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza AE, Taylor A, Westermann AM, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Matias-Guiu X. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Virchows Arch 2021; 478:153-190. [PMID: 33604759 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-020-03007-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. .,Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Sigurd F Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II, Graz, Austria.,School of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Maria Rosaria Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alina E Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Anneke M Westermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TU Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, CIBERONC, Irblleida, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Idibell, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann J, Bosse T, Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Gonzalez Martin A, Lax S, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice P, Nout RA, O'Donnell D, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza A, Taylor A, Westermann A, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Creutzberg CL. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 31:12-39. [PMID: 33397713 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 863] [Impact Index Per Article: 215.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multi-disciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria .,Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, CIBERONC, Irblleida, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Idibell, Spain
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Sigurd Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II, Graz, Austria.,School of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Maria Rosaria Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Anneke Westermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TU Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Aloisi A, Tseng J, Kuhn T, Feinberg J, Chi DS, Brown CL, Mueller JJ, Gardner GJ, Zivanovic O, Jewell EL, Long Roche K, Broach V, Abu-Rustum NR, Leitao MM. Robotic Surgery in the Frail Elderly: Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:3772-3780. [PMID: 32328983 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08475-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The frail are considered at higher risk for unfavorable surgical outcomes (major complications/mortality). We assessed the safety of and outcomes associated with robotic surgery in the frail elderly undergoing gynecologic procedures. METHODS We identified patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent a robotic procedure between May 2007 and December 2016. Frailty was defined as the presence of at least three of five frailty factors-more than five comorbidities, low physical activity, weight loss, exhaustion, and fatigue. Perioperative outcomes were recorded. We compared variables among frail and non-frail patients and performed a multivariate logistic regression to detect variables associated with major complications (≥ grade 3) or 90-day mortality. RESULTS We identified 982 patients: 71 frail and 911 non-frail patients. Median age was 71 years. Median BMI was 29.8 kg/m2. Thirty-four patients (3.5%) had a 30-day readmission. Seventy-seven (7.8%) had a postoperative complication, of which 23 (2.3%) were major. Ninety-day mortality was 0.5%. There were significant differences with regard to age (P < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.001) and performance status (P < 0.001); the frail were more likely to have had surgery for oncologic reasons (P = 0.047). There were differences in hospital stay (P < 0.001), postoperative (P = 0.042) and major complications (P = 0.007), and 90-day mortality (P = 0.05). At multivariable logistic regression, age ≥ 85 was associated with major complications. BMI, performance status, and major complications were associated with 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS The frail elderly have longer hospital stays and more complications after surgery than the general population, consistent with the reported literature. Careful selection of surgical candidates is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Aloisi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Jill Tseng
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Theresa Kuhn
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jacqueline Feinberg
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol L Brown
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Jewell
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vance Broach
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. .,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Endometrial cancer in the elderly: does age influence surgical treatments, outcomes, and prognosis? Menopause 2019; 25:968-976. [PMID: 29762198 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare clinicopathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, and survival rates for nonelderly (<75 years old) and elderly (≥75 years old) women with endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent surgery for EC at the gynecologic-oncologic surgery department of Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (Paris, France) from January, 2002 to December, 2015. Independent-group t tests and chi-square tests were used to compare elderly and nonelderly women. Survival rates were compared using log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests. RESULTS In the nonelderly and elderly groups, the mean age at EC diagnosis was 63 (range 33-74) and 81 (range 75-95) years, respectively. Compared with nonelderly patients, elderly patients (n = 104) presented with more advanced disease and more aggressive histological findings. However, surgical approaches did not differ between the two groups, and 76% of all patients underwent minimally invasive surgery. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 65% and 44% of nonelderly and elderly patients, respectively (P = 0.01), whereas para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in 26% and 9% of nonelderly and elderly patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). The incidence of perioperative complications was almost the same in the elderly and nonelderly groups. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was higher in the nonelderly group (P = 0.023), and the 5-year cancer-specific mortality rate was higher in the elderly group (P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS Although elderly patients present with cancers that are more aggressive, the management of EC in this population is not optimal. Further clinical studies need to be conducted for elderly women with EC, and specific treatment guidelines should be developed to improve their prognosis.
Collapse
|
11
|
Bogani G, Matteucci L, Tamberi S, Ditto A, Sabatucci I, Murgia F, Arcangeli V, Maltese G, Comerci G, Stefanetti M, Sonetto C, Calareso G, Marchiano A, Chiappa V, Lorusso D, Raspagliesi F. RECIST 1.1 criteria predict recurrence-free survival in advanced ovarian cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 237:93-99. [PMID: 31029972 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Revised: 04/06/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus interval debulking surgery is growing treatment strategy for advanced ovarian cancer patients with unresectable disease. Here, we aimed to assess predictors of surgical unresectability and survival of patients submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus interval debulking surgery. METHODS Data of consecutive 193 patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus interval debulking surgery were retrospectively evaluated in four Italian oncologic centers. RECIST 1.1 guidelines were used to assess response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS Overall, 155 (80.3%) and 38 (19.7%) patients had optimal and non-optimal cytoreduction at the time of interval debulking surgery. Via multivariate analysis, age (OR: 2.87 (95%CI: 1.29, 6.36) per 10-year increase) and radiological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR: 48.1 (95%CI: 6.33, 365.3)) impact on the inability to perform a complete cytoreduction. Patients having complete or partial response experienced a significant better disease-free survival than patients having stable or progressive disease at radiological examination (median disease-free survival 16.8 vs. 11.0 months; HR: 0.42 (95%CI: 0.09, 0.78); p = .001). Radiological response did not predict for overall survival (p = .719). CONCLUSIONS RECIST1.1 response criteria might be helpful to predict surgical resectability and disease-free survival of advanced stage ovarian cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus interval debulking surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonino Ditto
- Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Sabatucci
- Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Murgia
- Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Giuseppa Maltese
- Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Comerci
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale S. Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, Italy
| | | | - Cristina Sonetto
- Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Alfonso Marchiano
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Domenica Lorusso
- Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Racin A, Raimond E, Bendifallah S, Nyangoh Timoh K, Ouldamer L, Canlorbe G, Hudry N, Coutant C, Graesslin O, Touboul C, Collinet P, Bricou A, Huchon C, Koskas M, Ballester M, Daraï E, Levêque J, Lavoue V. Lymphadenectomy in elderly patients with high-intermediate-risk, high-risk or advanced endometrial cancer: Time to move from personalized cancer medicine to personalized patient medicine! Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1388-1395. [PMID: 30846299 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2018] [Revised: 02/02/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy are recommended for women with high-intermediate, high-risk and advanced endometrial cancer (EC). Lymphadenectomy is less frequently performed in elderly patients than in younger patients. We examined the survival of elderly women diagnosed with high-risk EC according to whether lymphadenectomy was performed or not. METHODS We selected women over 70 years with high-intermediate risk, high-risk or advanced EC from a multicenter retrospective cohort of women diagnosed between 2001 and 2013. Multivariate logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazards survival methods for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were used for analyses. RESULTS 71 women had lymphadenectomy and were compared with the 213 who did not. Recurrence was similar in both groups (42% vs 33%, respectively, p = 0.17) but more deaths were reported in the group without lymphadenectomy (38% vs 23%, respectively, p < 0.001). There was no difference in adjuvant treatment in the two groups (17% vs 27%, respectively, p = 0.27). Elderly patients without lymphadenectomy had lower 3-year DFS (56% vs 71%, p = 0.076), CSS (67% vs 85%, p < 0.001) and OS (50% vs 71% p < 0.001). The Cox proportional hazard models showed independently poorer prognosis in women without lymphadenectomy (3.027, 95% CI 1.58-5.81, p < 0.001), histology type 2 (3.46, 95% CI 1.51-7.97, p = 0.003) and lymphovascular space involvement (3.47, 95% CI 1.35-8.98, p = 0.01) on 3-year CSS. CONCLUSION No lymphadenectomy in elderly patients with high-risk or advanced EC is independently associated with poorer prognosis. Elderly patients with EC should benefit from lymphadenectomy when indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adélaïde Racin
- CHU de Rennes, Service de Gynécologie, Hôpital Sud, 16 bd de Bulgarie, Université de Rennes 1, U1242, Chemistry, Oncogenesis, Stress and Signaling, CLCC Eugène Marquis, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Emilie Raimond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris 6, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France; INSERM UMR_S_707, "Epidemiology, Information Systems, Modeling", University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris 6, France
| | - Krystel Nyangoh Timoh
- CHU de Rennes, Service de Gynécologie, Hôpital Sud, 16 bd de Bulgarie, Université de Rennes 1, U1242, Chemistry, Oncogenesis, Stress and Signaling, CLCC Eugène Marquis, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France
| | - Geoffroy Canlorbe
- INSERM UMR_S_707, "Epidemiology, Information Systems, Modeling", University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris 6, France
| | - Nina Hudry
- Center de lutte contre le cancer Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Charles Coutant
- Center de lutte contre le cancer Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Olivier Graesslin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Créteil, France
| | - Pierre Collinet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille, France
| | - Alexandre Bricou
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Jean Verdier University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), University Paris 13, France
| | - Cyrille Huchon
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Poissy, France
| | - Martin Koskas
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Bichat University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), France
| | - Marcos Ballester
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims, France; INSERM UMR_S_938, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6, France
| | - Emile Daraï
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims, France; INSERM UMR_S_938, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6, France
| | - Jean Levêque
- CHU de Rennes, Service de Gynécologie, Hôpital Sud, 16 bd de Bulgarie, Université de Rennes 1, U1242, Chemistry, Oncogenesis, Stress and Signaling, CLCC Eugène Marquis, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Vincent Lavoue
- CHU de Rennes, Service de Gynécologie, Hôpital Sud, 16 bd de Bulgarie, Université de Rennes 1, U1242, Chemistry, Oncogenesis, Stress and Signaling, CLCC Eugène Marquis, 35000, Rennes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vitale SG, Capriglione S, Zito G, Lopez S, Gulino FA, Di Guardo F, Vitagliano A, Noventa M, La Rosa VL, Sapia F, Valenti G, Rapisarda AMC, Peterlunger I, Rossetti D, Laganà AS. Management of endometrial, ovarian and cervical cancer in the elderly: current approach to a challenging condition. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018; 299:299-315. [PMID: 30542793 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-5006-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gynaecological cancer management in older people represents a current challenge. Therefore, in the present paper, we aimed to gather all the evidence reported in the literature concerning gynecological cancers in the elderly, illustrating the state of art and the future perspectives. METHODS We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, IBECS, BIOSIS, Web of Science, SCOPUS and Grey literature (Google Scholar; British Library) from January 1952 to May 2017, using the terms "ovarian cancer", "endometrial cancer", "cervical cancer", "gynecological cancers" combined with 'elderly', 'cancer', 'clinical trial' and 'geriatric assessment'. RESULTS The search identified 81 citations, of which 65 were potentially relevant after initial evaluation and met the criteria for inclusion and were analyzed. We divided all included studies into three different issue: "Endometrial cancer", "Ovarian cancer" and "Cervical cancer". CONCLUSIONS The present literature review shows that, in spite of the higher burden of comorbidities, elderly patients can also benefit from standard treatment to manage their gynecological cancers. It is important to overcome the common habit of undertreating the elderly patients because they are more fragile and with a lower life expectancy than their younger counterpart. Further trials with elderly women are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Giovanni Vitale
- Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood "G. Barresi", University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125, Messina, Italy
| | - Stella Capriglione
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istituto per la Sicurezza Sociale, 47893, Cailungo-Borgo Maggiore, Republic of San Marino.
| | - Gabriella Zito
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health-IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'Istria 65/1, 34137, Trieste, Italy
| | - Salvatore Lopez
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | - Federica Di Guardo
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Via Tindaro 2, 95124, Catania, Italy
| | - Amerigo Vitagliano
- Department of Woman and Child Health, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Noventa
- Department of Woman and Child Health, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Valentina Lucia La Rosa
- Unit of Psychodiagnostics and Clinical Psychology, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 78, 95124, Catania, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Sapia
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 78, 95124, Catania, Italy
| | - Gaetano Valenti
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 78, 95124, Catania, Italy
| | - Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 78, 95124, Catania, Italy
| | - Isabel Peterlunger
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Ospedale di Cattinara, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149, Trieste, Italy
| | - Diego Rossetti
- Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Desenzano del Garda Hospital, Section of Gavardo, Via A. Gosa 74, 25085, Gavardo, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood "G. Barresi", University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aloisi A, Tseng JH, Sandadi S, Callery R, Feinberg J, Kuhn T, Gardner GJ, Sonoda Y, Brown CL, Jewell EL, Barakat RR, Leitao MM. Is Robotic-Assisted Surgery Safe in the Elderly Population? An Analysis of Gynecologic Procedures in Patients ≥ 65 Years Old. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 26:244-251. [PMID: 30421046 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6997-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The elderly population is expanding worldwide but is underrepresented in clinical trials. We sought to assess the safety of robotic gynecologic surgery in an elderly cohort and to identify factors associated with unfavorable outcomes. METHODS All patients ≥ 65 years who underwent a robotically assisted procedure at a single institution between May 2007 to December 2016 were divided into three age groups: 65-74 (Group 1); 75-84 (Group 2); ≥ 85 (Group 3). Perioperative outcomes were recorded in patients who did not require conversion to laparotomy. We compared clinical variables among groups and performed multivariate logistic regression to detect variables associated with major complications (≥ Grade 3) or 90-day mortality. RESULTS We retrospectively identified 982 cases: 685 in Group 1; 249 in Group 2; 48 in Group 3. Median age = 71 years. Median BMI = 28.9. Malignancy was documented in 72.8% of cases; the majority were endometrial cancer (61.8%). Thirty-four patients (3.5%) were readmitted within 30 days. Seventy-seven (7.8%) had a postoperative complication, and 23 (2.3%) had a major complication. Ninety-day mortality was 0.5%. There was significant difference between groups with respect to body mass index (P = 0.026), ECOG PS (P ≤ 0.001), > 5 comorbidities (P = 0.005), hospital stay (P < 0.001), major complications (P = 0.001), and 90-day mortality (P < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, age ≥ 85 years was associated with major complications. Body mass index, age ≥ 85 years, and major complications were significantly associated with 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS Robotic-assisted surgery appears to be safe in an elderly cohort. The incidence of overall and major complications is consistent with those reported in the literature. Patients ≥ 85 years old appear to be at higher risk of unfavorable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Aloisi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jill H Tseng
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samith Sandadi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryan Callery
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Theresa Kuhn
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol L Brown
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Jewell
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard R Barakat
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.,Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. .,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Predictors and Patterns of Local, Regional, and Distant Failure in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva. Am J Clin Oncol 2017; 40:235-240. [PMID: 25503429 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
16
|
In-hospital complications of vaginal versus laparoscopic-assisted benign hysterectomy among older women: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Menopause 2016; 23:1233-1238. [PMID: 27465711 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000000713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This investigation compared the outcomes of vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies for nonprolapsed benign indications in older women. METHODS We conducted a population-based, retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study using data from the Taiwan's National Health Insurance program. Women who were aged 65 years or older with vaginal hysterectomy (n = 290) were compared with women who had laparoscopic hysterectomy for nonprolapsed benign indications (n = 290). Propensity score was calculated based on both patient- (age, socioeconomic status, residential urbanicity, comorbidity, status of any prior catastrophic illness, surgical diagnosis, and year of hysterectomy) and provider-related characteristics (physician's age and sex, hospital accreditation level, and ownership type). RESULTS Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy were not associated with increased risk of inpatient readmission within 30 days, in-hospital mortality, and in-hospital (including intraoperative) complications when compared with those who had vaginal hysterectomy. Women in the laparoscopic group had significantly shorter hospital stays than those in the vaginal group. The bleeding complications were mostly due to blood transfusion (2.1% in vaginal and 0.7% in laparoscopic hysterectomy groups) and urinary tract infection (1.0% in vaginal and 1.7% in laparoscopic hysterectomy groups). The surgical injury (intraoperative) complications included mostly surgical laceration of the urinary tract (0.7% in vaginal and 0.3% in laparoscopic hysterectomy groups). CONCLUSIONS Advanced age alone should not be the limiting factor for surgical referral of laparoscopic hysterectomy. The shorter hospital stay and low in-hospital complications associated with laparoscopic, as opposed to vaginal hysterectomies, are important attributes of a surgical procedure essential to the postoperative care in older women aged 65 years or more.
Collapse
|
17
|
Uccella S, Bonzini M, Palomba S, Fanfani F, Malzoni M, Ceccaroni M, Seracchioli R, Ferrero A, Berretta R, Vizza E, Sturla D, Roviglione G, Monterossi G, Casadio P, Volpi E, Mautone D, Corrado G, Bruni F, Scambia G, Ghezzi F. Laparoscopic vs. open treatment of endometrial cancer in the elderly and very elderly: An age-stratified multicenter study on 1606 women. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 141:211-217. [PMID: 26920107 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Revised: 02/19/2016] [Accepted: 02/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Objective To investigate in depth the effect of increasing age on the peri-operative outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer, compared to open surgery, with stratification of patients according to the different definitions of elderly age used in the literature. METHODS Data of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer staging at six centers were reviewed and analyzed according to surgical approach (laparoscopic or open), different definitions of elderly and very elderly age (≥65years, ≥75years, ≥80years), and class of age (<65; ≥65-<75; ≥75-80; ≥80years). Multivariable analysis to correct for possible confounders and propensity-score matching to minimize selection bias were used. RESULTS A total of 1606 patients were included: 938 and 668 patients received laparoscopic and open surgery, respectively. With increasing age, fewer patients received laparoscopy (P<0.001 with ANOVA). The percentage of patients who received lymphadenectomy declined significantly in both groups for age ≥80years. Blood transfusions, incidence and severity of post-operative complications, and hospital stay were significantly lower among patients who had laparoscopy both in younger (<65years) and elderly (whether defined as ≥65 or ≥75years) patients, with no effect of age on any of the characteristics analyzed ( ANOVA P>0.05). The same tendency was observed among very-elderly patients (≥80years). Multivariable and propensity score-matched analysis confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopy for staging endometrial cancer retains its advantages over open surgery even in elderly and very-elderly patients. Our data strongly suggest that minimally-invasive surgery is advantageous even among subjects ≥80years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Uccella
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy.
| | - Matteo Bonzini
- Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Research Centre, Insubria University, Varese, Italy
| | - Stefano Palomba
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS - ASMN of Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University "Gabriele d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - Mario Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni - Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecological Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceccaroni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, Sacred Heart Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Minimally-Invasive Gynecological Surgery Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Annamaria Ferrero
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Torino, Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Roberto Berretta
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Gynecologic Oncologic Unit, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Davide Sturla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Giovanni Roviglione
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, Sacred Heart Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Giorgia Monterossi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Casadio
- Minimally-Invasive Gynecological Surgery Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Volpi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Torino, Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Daniele Mautone
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Giacomo Corrado
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Gynecologic Oncologic Unit, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Bruni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, Sacred Heart Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bourgin C, Saidani M, Poupon C, Cauchois A, Foucher F, Leveque J, Lavoue V. Endometrial cancer in elderly women: Which disease, which surgical management? A systematic review of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:166-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2015] [Revised: 10/13/2015] [Accepted: 11/01/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
|
19
|
Bogani G, Cromi A, Serati M, Di Naro E, Casarin J, Pinelli C, Candeloro I, Sturla D, Ghezzi F. Improving standard of care through introduction of laparoscopy for the surgical management of gynecological malignancies. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 25:741-50. [PMID: 25675038 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the impact on perioperative and medium-term oncologic outcomes of the implementation of laparoscopy into a preexisting oncologic setting. METHODS Data from consecutive 736 patients undergoing surgery for apparent early stage gynecological malignancies (endometrial, cervical, and adnexal cancers) between 2000 and 2011 were reviewed. Complications were graded per the Accordion classification. Survival outcomes within the first 5 years were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Overall, 493 (67%), 162 (22%), and 81 (11%) had surgery for apparent early stage endometrial, cervical, and adnexal cancer. We assisted at an increase of the number of patients undergoing surgery via laparoscopy through the years (from 10% in the years 2000-2003 to 82% in years 2008-2011; P < 0.001 for trend); while the need to perform open surgery decreased dramatically (from 83% to 10%; P < 0.001). Vaginal approach was nearly stable over the years (from 7% to 8%; P = 0.76). A marked reduction in estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, blood transfusions as well as grade greater than or equal to 3 postoperative complications over the years was observed (P < 0.001). Surgical radicality assessed lymph nodes count was not influenced by the introduction of laparoscopic approach (P > 0.05). The introduction of laparoscopy did not adversely affect medium-term (within 5 years) survival outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for apparent early stage cancers of the endometrium, uterine cervix, and adnexa (P > 0.05 log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS The introduction of laparoscopy into a preexisting oncologic service allows an improvement of standard of care due to a gain in perioperative results, without detriments of medium-term oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Varese; and †Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Endometrial Cancer Surgery for Elderly Women--The Early Postoperative Period. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25:1652-5. [PMID: 26332393 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the early postoperative period and assess whether elderly patients recuperate differently than do their younger counterparts after surgery for endometrial cancer. METHODS This retrospective chart review comprised all women older than 75 years who underwent laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging at our center from January 2005 through December 2010 and a consecutive control group of women younger than 74 years. Parameters included demographic variables, surgical procedure/findings, postoperative morbidity, and pathology. RESULTS Ninety patients older than 75 years and 88 younger patients were identified. The elderly patients had a statistically significant prolonged wait for bowel movement (5.9 vs 3.1 days, P = 0.002) and ambulated later (4.1 vs 1.1 days, P < 0.001). Postoperative hospital stay was similar in both groups (5.8 vs 4.2 days, P = 0.37). Early postoperative complications (fever, bowel, wound, eventration, cardiopulmonary) occurred at a similar rate in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients after laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging ambulated later and recovered bowel function later than did the younger patients. This did not translate into prolonged hospital stay or excessive complications. Earlier intervention with physical therapy and stool softeners can possibly close this gap in recovery.
Collapse
|
21
|
Lunardi P, Vidal F, Accadbled F, Leguevaque P, Soule-Tholy M, Beauval JB, Motton S. Bilateral femur metastases in low-grade endometrial carcinoma. Clin Case Rep 2015; 3:582-6. [PMID: 26273447 PMCID: PMC4527801 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2014] [Revised: 01/25/2015] [Accepted: 02/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Lower-limb bone metastases are uncommon in low-grade endometrial carcinoma, and are mostly located on the axial skeleton. Here, we present a rare case of bilateral femur metastases in low-grade endometrial carcinoma and performed a review of the current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Lunardi
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplantation, CHU Rangueil Toulouse, France
| | - Fabien Vidal
- Department of Gynaecology and General Surgery, CHU Rangueil Toulouse, France
| | | | - Pierre Leguevaque
- Department of Gynaecology and General Surgery, CHU Rangueil Toulouse, France
| | - Marc Soule-Tholy
- Department of Gynaecology and General Surgery, CHU Rangueil Toulouse, France
| | - Jean Baptiste Beauval
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplantation, CHU Rangueil Toulouse, France
| | - Stéphanie Motton
- Department of Gynaecology and General Surgery, CHU Rangueil Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Obesity and perioperative pulmonary complications in robotic gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213:33.e1-33.e7. [PMID: 25637843 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2014] [Revised: 01/08/2015] [Accepted: 01/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Robotic gynecological surgery is feasible in obese patients, but there remain concerns about the safety of this approach because the positioning required for pelvic surgery can exacerbate obesity-related changes in respiratory physiology. The objective of our study was to evaluate pulmonary and all-cause complication rates in obese women undergoing robotic gynecological surgery and to assess variables that may be associated with complications. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective chart review was performed on obese patients (body mass index of ≥30 kg/m(2)) who underwent robotic gynecological surgery at 2 academic institutions between 2006 and 2012. The primary outcome was pulmonary complications and the secondary outcome was all-cause complications. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the associations between patient baseline variables, operative variables, ventilator parameters, and complications. RESULTS Of 1032 patients, 146 patients (14%) had any complication, whereas only 33 patients (3%) had a pulmonary complication. Median body mass index was 37 kg/m(2). Only age was significantly associated with a higher risk of pulmonary complications (P = .01). Older age, higher estimated blood loss, and longer case length were associated with a higher rate of all-cause complications (P = .0001, P < .0001, and P = .004, respectively). No other covariates were strongly associated with complications. CONCLUSION The vast majority of obese patients can successfully tolerate robotic gynecological surgery and have overall low complications rates and even lower rates of pulmonary complications. The degree of obesity was not predictive of successful robotic surgery and subsequent complications.
Collapse
|
24
|
Laparoscopic and vaginal approaches to hysterectomy in the obese. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 189:85-90. [PMID: 25898369 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2014] [Revised: 02/14/2015] [Accepted: 02/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
25
|
The role of laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2015; 10:44-8. [PMID: 25960792 PMCID: PMC4414107 DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2015.49249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2014] [Revised: 12/29/2014] [Accepted: 01/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Endometrial carcinoma is one of the most common neoplasms in gynecological oncology and the most common genital cancer in women in developed countries. The 5-year overall survival rate depends on the FIGO stage. For patients with stage I endometrial cancer it is estimated as 80%. Traditionally, the main treatment of endometrial cancer consists of total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and, in some histological or clinical stages, with additional pelvic lymphadenectomy. The main surgical approach so far for women with endometrial cancer has been laparotomy. However, in the last decades there have been many reports stating that the survival rate in such cases is similar after laparoscopy and laparotomy. Some researchers claim that laparoscopy is as effective as laparotomy, and it might be much more precise than laparotomy thanks to its special optic system. Aim To establish the method of choice for treatment of stage I endometrial cancer. Material and methods Comparing the preliminary results from data collected during surgical procedures performed at the First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Medical Centre of Postgraduate Education in Warsaw and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Rural Hospital in Garwolin. Results Laparoscopy is as effective as laparotomy, and it might be much more precise than laparotomy. Conclusions Taking into consideration all the above arguments, if an experienced endoscopic surgeon and proper laparoscopic equipment are available, laparoscopy might become the method of choice for treatment of stage I endometrial cancer.
Collapse
|
26
|
Doo DW, Guntupalli SR, Corr BR, Sheeder J, Davidson SA, Behbakht K, Jarrett MJ, Guy MS. Comparative Surgical Outcomes for Endometrial Cancer Patients 65 Years Old or Older Staged With Robotics or Laparotomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22:3687-94. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4428-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
27
|
Chemotherapy Reduces Para-aortic Node Recurrences in Endometrial Cancer With Positive Pelvic and Unknown Para-aortic Nodes. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25:263-8. [PMID: 25486102 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate how the administration of different adjuvant therapies influences the risk for developing recurrences in the para-aortic area in endometrial cancer (EC) with positive pelvic and unknown para-aortic nodes.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the data of 58 patients with EC affected by stage IIIC1 who had undergone pelvic but not para-aortic lymphadenectomy from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2011. Survival outcomes within the first 5 years after surgery were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier model.ResultsChemotherapy plus radiotherapy, chemotherapy only, and external radiotherapy only were administered in 12 (23%), 18 (34%), and 23 (43%) patients, respectively. Five (9%) patients, who were selected to forego adjuvant therapy due to poor performance status, were excluded from the analysis. Disease-free and overall survivals assessed at 5 years were 54%, and 61%, respectively. All para-aortic recurrences were observed among the patients with endometrioid EC, whereas no cases of para-aortic recurrences were found in patients with nonendometrioid histology (5/36 (14%) vs 0/17 (0%); P = 0.16); the latter were more likely to develop distant (hematogenous, peritoneal, and distant lymphatic) recurrences (P = 0.09). Type of adjuvant therapy was the only factor influencing para-aortic failure: chemotherapy (± radiotherapy) reduced the rate of para-aortic node recurrence in comparison with pelvic radiotherapy as a sole modality (P = 0.01). However, adjuvant therapy did not influence the 5-year survival outcomes (P > 0.05).ConclusionsIn the absence of local treatment (ie, para-aortic lymphadenectomy and radiotherapy), the administration of chemotherapy seems effective in reducing recurrences in the para-aortic area among patients with stage IIIC1 endometrioid EC.
Collapse
|
28
|
Bogani G, Cromi A, Serati M, Di Naro E, Casarin J, Marconi N, Pinelli C, Ghezzi F. Hysterectomy in patients with previous cesarean section: comparison between laparoscopic and vaginal approaches. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 184:53-7. [PMID: 25463636 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2014] [Revised: 10/29/2014] [Accepted: 11/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
29
|
Bogani G, Uccella S, Cromi A, Serati M, Casarin J, Sturla D, Ghezzi F. Electric Motorized Morcellator Versus Transvaginal Extraction for Myoma Retrieval After Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Propensity-matched Analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21:928-34. [PMID: 24780382 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2014] [Revised: 04/12/2014] [Accepted: 04/17/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
30
|
Bogani G, Cromi A, Serati M, Di Naro E, Uccella S, Donadello N, Ghezzi F. Predictors of postoperative morbidity after laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy plus external beam radiotherapy: A propensity-matched comparison. J Surg Oncol 2014; 110:893-8. [PMID: 25132470 DOI: 10.1002/jso.23747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2014] [Accepted: 07/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; University of Insubria; Del Ponte Hospital Varese Italy
| | - Antonella Cromi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; University of Insubria; Del Ponte Hospital Varese Italy
| | - Maurizio Serati
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; University of Insubria; Del Ponte Hospital Varese Italy
| | - Edoardo Di Naro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; University of Bari; Bari Italy
| | - Stefano Uccella
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; University of Insubria; Del Ponte Hospital Varese Italy
| | - Nicoletta Donadello
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; University of Insubria; Del Ponte Hospital Varese Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; University of Insubria; Del Ponte Hospital Varese Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Comparison of reoperation rates, perioperative outcomes in women with endometrial cancer when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to laparoscopy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 290:1215-20. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3347-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2013] [Accepted: 06/27/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
32
|
Bogani G, Cromi A, Uccella S, Serati M, Casarin J, Pinelli C, Ghezzi F. Safety of Perioperative Aspirin Therapy in Minimally Invasive Endometrial Cancer Staging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21:636-41. [PMID: 24462596 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2013] [Revised: 01/07/2014] [Accepted: 01/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
33
|
|
34
|
Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21:857-62. [PMID: 24699300 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2014] [Revised: 03/18/2014] [Accepted: 03/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare perioperative and long-term outcomes related to laparoscopic and open abdominal surgical management of cervical cancer. DESIGN Propensity-matched comparison of prospectively collected data (Canadian Task Force classification II-1). SETTING University teaching hospital. PATIENTS Sixty-five propensity-matched patient pairs (130 patients) undergoing either laparoscopy or open abdominal surgical procedures to treat cervical cancer. INTERVENTION Radical hysterectomy plus lymphadenectomy was performed via the laparoscopic (LRH) or open abdominal approach (RAH). MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS Baseline characteristics of the study populations were similar. In the LRH group the procedure was converted to open surgery in 2 patients (2%). Compared with the RAH group, patients undergoing LRH experienced less blood loss (200 vs 500 mL; p < .001), a lower transfusion rate (6% vs 22%; p = .02), similar operative time (245 vs 259.5 minutes; p = .26), and shorter length of hospital stay (4 vs 8 days; p < .001). No between-group differences in intraoperative complications were recorded (p = 1.0); however, a trend toward a lower postoperative complication rate (Accordion system grade ≥ 3) was observed for LRH compared with RAH (4 patients [6%]) vs 12 patients [18%]; p = .06). Five-year disease-free survival (p = .6, log-rank test) and overall survival (p = .31, log-rank test) did not differ statistically between women undergoing LRH or RAH. CONCLUSION Laparoscopy ensures the same results as open surgery insofar as radicality and long-term survival. Use of the laparoscopic approach is associated with improved short-term results, minimizing the occurrence of severe postoperative complications.
Collapse
|
35
|
Bogani G, Uccella S, Cromi A, Serati M, Casarin J, Pinelli C, Ghezzi F. Low vs standard pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic hysterectomy: prospective randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 21:466-71. [PMID: 24374246 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2013] [Revised: 12/11/2013] [Accepted: 12/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare the use of low pneumoperitoneum pressure (LPP; 8 mm Hg) vs standard pneumoperitoneum pressure (SPP; 12 mm Hg) during mini-laparoscopic hysterectomy (MLH). DESIGN Randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING Tertiary care center. PATIENTS Forty-two consecutive women scheduled to undergo MLH to treat benign uterine disease. INTERVENTIONS Women were randomly selected to undergo MLH using LPP (n = 20) or SPP (n = 22). MLH was performed via 3-mm ancillary ports. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The primary outcome was to evaluate changes in abdominal and shoulder-tip pain via a 100-mm visual analog scale at 1, 3, and 24 hours postoperatively. All procedures were completed via mini-laparoscopy without the need to increase intra-abdominal pressure or convert to conventional laparoscopy or open surgery. Intraoperatively, 1 episode of severe bradycardia occurred in the LPP group, whereas no intraoperative complications were recorded in the SPP group (p = .47). No postoperative complications were recorded (p > .99). Abdominal pain was similar between groups at each time point. Incidence and intensity of shoulder-tip pain at 1 and 3 hours postoperatively was lower in the LPP group than in the SPP group (p < .05), whereas no between-group differences were observed at 24 hours (p > .05). Rescue analgesic requirement did not differ statistically between the LPP and SPP groups (20% vs 41%, respectively; p = .19; odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-11.08). CONCLUSION In experienced hands, use of LPP is safe and feasible. During performance of MLH, compared with SPP, LPP is a simple method that offers advantages of less shoulder-tip pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy.
| | - Stefano Uccella
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Antonella Cromi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Maurizio Serati
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Ciro Pinelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|