1
|
Antonino A. Endoscopic Primary Breast Augmentation With Loco-Regional Anesthesia: Preliminary Experience of 200 Consecutive Patients. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum 2024; 6:ojae033. [PMID: 38938928 PMCID: PMC11210060 DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojae033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Breast augmentation with implants recorded over 1.6 billion procedures globally in 2022. To reduce surgical trauma and complications and facilitate a fast recovery, we employ an ultrasound-guided local-regional anesthesia technique, the creation of a partial submuscular implant pocket by direct endoscopic visualization and minimal skin access on the mammary fold. Objectives The aim in this study is to evaluate whether breast augmentation performed in endoscopy under local-regional anesthesia reduces postoperative recovery time, reduces complications, and increases patient satisfaction. Methods Patients provided their consent through a signed form. We set strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. We prospectively evaluated postoperative pain and recovery times, the rate of complications, and patient satisfaction at 12 months postsurgery. Results Between January 2021 and September 2022, 200 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average operation time was 54.2 min. Patients were discharged from the hospital within 2 to 3 h. Eighty-nine percent of patients expressed great satisfaction with the result. None of the patients experienced postsurgical complications. Conclusions In our initial study, we showed that endoscopic breast augmentation conducted under localized anesthesia is safe. It allows for quick recovery postsurgery and swift resumption of everyday activities. The overall complication risk is less than what has been reported in scientific studies for the classic dual-plane technique. Moreover, this approach yields excellent patient satisfaction. Additional prospective and randomized studies will be required to enhance the scientific validity of this technique. Moreover, a larger patient cohort will be essential to stratify the risks associated with varying prosthetic volumes. Level of Evidence 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Araco Antonino
- Corresponding Author: Dr Araco Antonino, Piazza Dei Re di Roma 71, 00183 Roma, Italy. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Myckatyn TM, Duran Ramirez JM, Walker JN, Hanson BM. Management of Biofilm with Breast Implant Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 152:919e-942e. [PMID: 37871028 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand how bacteria negatively impact aesthetic and reconstructive breast implants. 2. Understand how bacteria infect breast implants. 3. Understand the evidence associated with common implant infection-prevention strategies, and their limitations. 4. Understand why implementation of bacteria-mitigation strategies such as antibiotic administration or "no-touch" techniques may not indefinitely prevent breast implant infection. SUMMARY Bacterial infection of aesthetic and reconstructive breast implants is a common and expensive problem. Subacute infections or chronic capsular contractures leading to device explantation are the most commonly documented sequelae. Although bench and translational research underscores the complexities of implant-associated infection, high-quality studies with adequate power, control groups, and duration of follow-up are lacking. Common strategies to minimize infections use antibiotics-administered systemically, in the breast implant pocket, or by directly bathing the implant before insertion-to limit bacterial contamination. Limiting contact between the implant and skin or breast parenchyma represents an additional common strategy. The clinical prevention of breast implant infection is challenged by the clean-contaminated nature of breast parenchyma, and the variable behavior of not only specific bacterial species but also their strains. These factors impact bacterial virulence and antibiotic resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terence M Myckatyn
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine
| | | | - Jennifer N Walker
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics
- Center for Infectious Diseases, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
| | - Blake M Hanson
- Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Microbial Genomics, McGovern Medical School
- Center for Infectious Diseases, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morkuzu S, Ozdemir M, Leach GA, Kanapathy M, Mosahebi A, Reid CM. Keller Funnel Efficacy in "No Touch" Breast Augmentation and Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2022; 10:e4676. [PMID: 36448016 PMCID: PMC9699649 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Breast augmentation is one of the most common aesthetic surgical procedures. Tissue expansion followed by permanent implants is the most frequent postmastectomy breast reconstruction method. Implant contamination remains a critical problem with these procedures' resulting in acute infection as well as capsular contracture. To reduce the risk of implant contamination, the "no-touch technique" utilizing the Keller funnel has been adopted by many surgeons. This systematic review aims to investigate the advantages of the Keller funnel method for breast augmentation-reconstruction. Methods A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane database, and Google Scholar was performed between 2005 and 2021. All clinical-based, retrospective and prospective studies utilizing the Keller funnel method for breast implant insertion were selected. Results Six studies were identified for evaluation: five were retrospective cohorts and one was a prospective trial. No randomized controlled trials were found. Outcomes reported included lower rates of capsular contracture (RR, 0.42; P = 0.0006; 95% CI, 0.25-0.69), shorter incision lengths (35.5 ± 2.1 mm), less insertion time (mean = 6 seconds), and decreased complications, and one paper reported ultimately greater patient satisfaction with outcomes (BREAST-Q Score: 92%). Conclusions This review suggests that the Keller funnel is a useful method for no-touch breast augmentation and reconstruction surgery. The Keller funnel reduces subsequent capsular contracture rate, surgical time, and incision length and allows for easier insertion. However, our findings support recommendation of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial with larger population size and follow-up intervals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suat Morkuzu
- From the Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex
| | - Mehmet Ozdemir
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dicle University Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - Garrison A. Leach
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif
| | - Muholan Kanapathy
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Free Hospital; and Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Afshin Mosahebi
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Free Hospital; and Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chris M. Reid
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Comparison of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Using Oxychlorosene versus Triple Antibiotic Solution for Pocket Irrigation. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2022; 10:e3975. [PMID: 35999887 PMCID: PMC9390816 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast pocket irrigation with antiseptic solutions is performed to reduce contamination with breast implants. The optimal antiseptic irrigation solution and the efficacy of individual practices are unclear. Oxychlorosene sodium is frequently used at our institution. Oxychlorosene is bactericidal with a mechanism of action of oxidation and hypochlorination. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes of oxychlorosene sodium irrigation with triple antibiotic solution (TAS) in implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODS All patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction after mastectomy were reviewed. The primary predictive variable was type of solution used for pocket irrigation (TAS or oxychlorosene). Outcome variables included surgical site infection, device removal, and wound complications. RESULTS Between 2013 and 2018, 331 implant-based breast reconstructions were performed. Of these, 62% (n = 206) received oxychlorosene for surgical pocket irrigation (group I), and 38% (n = 125) received TAS (group II). Group I had an 11.7% (n = 24) 90-day surgical site infection rate, with 4.9% (n = 10) requiring oral antibiotics, 2.4% (n = 5) requiring intravenous antibiotics without device removal, and 4.4% (n = 9) requiring prosthetic removal. Group II had an 11.2% (n = 14) 90-day infection rate, with 5.6% (n = 7) requiring oral antibiotics, 2.4% (n = 3) requiring intravenous antibiotics without device removal, and 3.2% (n = 4) requiring removal (P = 0.90). When comparing the cost of oxychlorosene irrigation with TAS irrigation, oxychlorosene was less expensive. CONCLUSIONS Oxychlorosene and TAS have similar surgical site infection rates in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Ease of preparation and cost make oxychlorosene a more favorable option for antibiotic irrigation in reconstructive breast surgery with prosthetic devices.
Collapse
|
5
|
Guimier E, Carson L, David B, Lambert JM, Heery E, Malcolm RK. Pharmacological Approaches for the Prevention of Breast Implant Capsular Contracture. J Surg Res 2022; 280:129-150. [PMID: 35969932 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Capsular contracture is a common complication associated with breast implants following reconstructive or aesthetic surgery in which a tight or constricting scar tissue capsule forms around the implant, often distorting the breast shape and resulting in chronic pain. Capsulectomy (involving full removal of the capsule surrounding the implant) and capsulotomy (where the capsule is released and/or partly removed to create more space for the implant) are the most common surgical procedures used to treat capsular contracture. Various structural modifications of the implant device (including use of textured implants, submuscular placement of the implant, and the use of polyurethane-coated implants) and surgical strategies (including pre-operative skin washing and irrigation of the implant pocket with antibiotics) have been and/or are currently used to help reduce the incidence of capsular contracture. In this article, we review the pharmacological approaches-both commonly practiced in the clinic and experimental-reported in the scientific and clinical literature aimed at either preventing or treating capsular contracture, including (i) pre- and post-operative intravenous administration of drug substances, (ii) systemic (usually oral) administration of drugs before and after surgery, (iii) modification of the implant surface with grafted drug substances, (iv) irrigation of the implant or peri-implant tissue with drugs prior to implantation, and (v) incorporation of drugs into the implant shell or filler prior to surgery followed by drug release in situ after implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Louise Carson
- School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Benny David
- NuSil Technology LLC, Carpinteria, California
| | | | | | - R Karl Malcolm
- School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Defining the Relationship Between Pocket and Breast Implant Surface Area as the Basis for a New Classification System for Capsular Contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150:496-509. [PMID: 35749734 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The precise etiology and treatment for capsular contracture remains uncertain at least partially due to the fact that there is no reliable quantitative measurement tool. To address this, it is postulated that the surface area of an implant as defined by the surrounding pocket may provide a quantifiable variable that can be measured to evaluate the degree of capsular contracture. METHODS A bench model for capsular contracture was developed. The surface area of a series of spherical test objects and non-contracted and contracted breast implants was measured using a wax coating technique as well as three-dimensional reconstructions created from CT scan images. RESULTS Comparison of the mathematically calculated surface areas to the wax and CT results for spheres of known dimension provided nearly identical values documenting the accuracy of the two experimental methods. Comparison of the surface area measurements between the test groups showed that the average decrease in surface area for all implants was 20%, ranging from a high of 30.9% for a low profile implant to a low of 14.1 % for a high profile implant. The anatomically shaped devices demonstrated nearly uniform degrees of surface area change over three different heights with volume and projection held relatively constant. CONCLUSIONS The described bench model provides a useful tool for the study of capsular contracture. Surface area is a descriptive variable that can assess the degree of capsular contracture that is present. A classification system based on surface area is presented.
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang Y, Zhang Q, Tan Y, Lv W, Zhao C, Xiong M, Hou K, Wu M, Ren Y, Zeng N, Wu Y. Current Progress in Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Front Oncol 2022; 11:785887. [PMID: 35070989 PMCID: PMC8770274 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.785887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is an uncommon type of T-cell lymphoma. Although with a low incidence, the epidemiological data raised the biosafety and health concerns of breast reconstruction and breast augmentation for BIA-ALCL. Emerging evidence confirms that genetic features, bacterial contamination, chronic inflammation, and textured breast implant are the relevant factors leading to the development of BIA-ALCL. Almost all reported cases with a medical history involve breast implants with a textured surface, which reflects the role of implant surface characteristics in BIA-ALCL. With this review, we expect to highlight the most significant features on etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy of BIA-ALCL, as well as we review the physical characteristics of breast implants and their potential pathogenic effect and hopefully provide a foundation for optimal choice of type of implant with minimal morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Min Wu
- Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yuping Ren
- Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ning Zeng
- Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yiping Wu
- *Correspondence: Yiping Wu, ; Min Wu, ; Yuping Ren, ; Ning Zeng,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jewell ML, Bionda N, Moran AV, Bevels EJ, Jewell HL, Hariri S, Leung BK. In Vitro Evaluation of Common Antimicrobial Solutions Used for Breast Implant Soaking and Breast Pocket Irrigation-Part 2: Efficacy Against Biofilm-Associated Bacteria. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41:1252-1262. [PMID: 33512424 PMCID: PMC8520026 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Biofilm-associated bacteria have been observed in both breast implant revision and tissue expander-implant exchange surgeries. The utilization of antimicrobial solutions in breast surgery, especially those containing triple antibiotics (TAB) and/or 10% povidone-iodine (PI), may help reduce existing biofilm-associated bacteria, which is particularly important in a mature breast pocket that may contain residual bacteria from a previously colonized implant surface or, theoretically, bacteria that may arrive postoperatively through hematogenous spread. Objectives A series of in vitro assessments was performed to evaluate the antimicrobial utility of TAB and PI, either alone or in combination, against preformed biofilm-associated bacteria. Methods Preformed biofilm-associated gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains were exposed to TAB and PI ± TAB for up to 30 minutes in a bacterial time-kill assay. Efficacy of various dilutions of PI and the effects of serum protein on PI efficacy were also investigated. Results TAB was ineffective at the timeframes tested when utilized alone; when utilized in conjunction with PI, significant log reduction of all biofilm-associated bacterial species tested was achieved when treated for at least 5 minutes. PI alone at a concentration of 25% or higher was also effective, although its efficacy was negatively affected by increasing serum protein concentration only for Staphylococcus epidermidis. Conclusions Our data indicate that PI-containing solutions significantly reduce biofilm-associated bacteria, suggesting potential utility for breast pocket irrigation during revision or exchange surgeries. Care should be taken to minimize excessive dilution of PI to maintain efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Braden K Leung
- Corresponding Author: Braden K. Leung, PhD, Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie company, 2525 Dupont Dr, M/S: RD2-2A, Irvine, CA 92612, USA. E-mail: ; Twitter: @BradenLeung
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jewell ML, Hariri S, Lantz EE, Jewell HL, Strickland AD, Leung BK. In Vitro Evaluation of Common Antimicrobial Solutions Used for Breast Implant Soaking and Breast Pocket Irrigation-Part 1: Efficacy Against Planktonic Bacteria. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41:1242-1251. [PMID: 33206158 PMCID: PMC8520025 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Planktonic bacteria can be inadvertently introduced during breast surgery procedures, which are hypothesized to lead to complications such as infection, capsular contracture, breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, and a prolonged local inflammatory response. The utilization of antimicrobial solutions such as triple antibiotic solution (TAB) and/or 10% povidone-iodine (PI) in breast pocket irrigation or implant soaking has been proposed to reduce planktonic bacterial attachment and potential complications. OBJECTIVES A series of in vitro assessments were performed to evaluate the antimicrobial utility of TAB and PI, either alone or in combination, against planktonic bacteria. METHODS Planktonic gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains were exposed to TAB and PI ± TAB for up to 10 minutes in a bacterial time-kill assay. The efficacy of various dilutions of PI as well as the effects of serum protein on PI efficacy were also investigated. RESULTS TAB was ineffective at the timeframes tested (≤10 minutes) when utilized alone; however, when utilized with PI, significant log reduction of all tested planktonic species was achieved. PI alone was also effective, even including dilute concentrations (eg, 0.5% PI), although the presence of serum proteins required higher concentrations of PI (eg, 2.5%) to eradicate the bacterial load. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest PI-containing solutions may be preferred over either saline or TAB without PI for primary breast pocket irrigation and implant soaking in primary breast surgeries as a means to significantly reduce planktonic bacteria. These data provide an impetus for surgeons to re-evaluate the efficacy of TAB solution in these clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Braden K Leung
- Corresponding Author: Dr Braden K. Leung, Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie company, 2525 Dupont Dr, M/S: RD2-2A, Irvine, CA 92612, USA. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Safran T, Nepon H, Chu CK, Winocour S, Murphy AM, Davison PG, Dionisopolos T, Vorstenbosch J. Current Concepts in Capsular Contracture: Pathophysiology, Prevention, and Management. Semin Plast Surg 2021; 35:189-197. [PMID: 34526867 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Over 400,000 women in the United States alone will have breast implant surgery each year. Although capsular contracture represents the most common complication of breast implant surgery, surgeons continue to debate the precise etiology. General agreement exists concerning the inflammatory origin of capsular fibrosis, but the inciting events triggering the inflammatory cascade appear to be multifactorial, making it difficult to predict why one patient may develop capsular contracture while another will not. Accordingly, researchers have explored many different surgical, biomaterial, and medical therapies to address these multiple factors in an attempt to prevent and treat capsular contracture. In the current paper, we aim to inform the reader on the most up-to-date understanding of the pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment of capsular contracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Safran
- Division of Plastic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hillary Nepon
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carrie K Chu
- Department of Plastic Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sebastian Winocour
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Amanda M Murphy
- Division of Plastic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Peter G Davison
- Division of Plastic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gilmour A, Cutress R, Gandhi A, Harcourt D, Little K, Mansell J, Murphy J, Pennery E, Tillett R, Vidya R, Martin L. Oncoplastic breast surgery: A guide to good practice. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2272-2285. [PMID: 34001384 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Oncoplastic Breast Surgery has become standard of care in the management of Breast Cancer patients. These guidelines written by an Expert Advisory Group; convened by the Association of Breast Surgery (ABS) and the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS), are designed to provide all members of the breast cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) with guidance on the best breast surgical oncoplastic and reconstructive practice at each stage of a patient's journey, based on current evidence. It is hoped they will also be of benefit to the wide range of professionals and service commissioners who are involved in this area of clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gilmour
- Canniesburn Plastic Surgery Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom
| | - R Cutress
- University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - A Gandhi
- Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre & Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - D Harcourt
- Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - K Little
- Liverpool Breast Unit, Liverpool University Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - J Mansell
- Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - J Murphy
- Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | | | - R Tillett
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - R Vidya
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
| | - L Martin
- Liverpool Breast Unit, Liverpool University Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hasan S, Mujadzic M, Kaswan S, Halpern J, Van Natta B, Lund H. Preliminary Outcomes of Hypochlorous Acid as an Adjunct for Pocket Irrigation in Revision Aesthetic Breast Surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41:NP152-NP158. [PMID: 32651995 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Capsular contracture is a challenging problem for plastic surgeons despite advances in surgical technique. Breast pocket irrigation decreases bacterial bioburden. Studies have shown that hypochlorous acid (HOCl; PhaseOne Health, Nashville, TN) effectively penetrates and disrupts biofilms; however, there are limited clinical data regarding this irrigation in breast augmentation. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of HOCl pocket irrigation in revision breast augmentation by evaluating rates of capsular contracture recurrence, infection, and allergic reactions. METHODS We performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review of revision breast augmentation cases for Baker grade III/IV capsular contractures in which pockets were irrigated with HOCl. Data were obtained from 3 board-certified plastic surgeons. RESULTS The study included 135 breasts in 71 patients, who ranged in age from 27 to 77 years (mean, 53.7 years). Follow-up ranged from 12 to 41 months (mean, 20.2 months). Postoperatively, there were 2 unilateral Baker grade III/IV recurrences at 13 months and 1 bilateral Baker grade II recurrence at 3 months. There were no infections or allergic reactions. The overall Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture recurrence rate was 0% at 12 months and 1.5% at 15 months. CONCLUSIONS Breast pocket irrigation decreases bioburden, which may influence capsular contracture recurrence. We evaluated 3 varied applications of HOCl in revision aesthetic breast surgery and found a low capsular contracture recurrence rate and no adverse reactions. We plan to report our findings with HOCl in primary breast augmentation in the future, and other studies are being conducted on the efficacy of HOCl in aesthetic surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Hasan
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Mirza Mujadzic
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Sumesh Kaswan
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Baker NF, Hart AM, Carlson GW, Losken A. A Systematic Review of Breast Irrigation in Implant-Based Breast Surgery. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86:359-364. [PMID: 33555689 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aesthetic and reconstructive implant-based breast surgeries are some of the most frequently performed procedures by plastic surgeons. As such, prevention of implant infection is of high importance. However, there remains no criterion-standard protocol for irrigation of the breast pocket. This review focuses on current irrigation practices in implant-based breast surgery. METHODS Four databases were used to search for all studies, including randomized controlled trials, retrospective cohort, and prospective cohort, containing original data related to the outcomes investigated in this study. Search terms included "breast," "irrigation," and "infection" in different combinations to isolate studies that focused on irrigation methods in both reconstructive and augmentation surgeries. Our selection criteria specifically concentrated on those studies that explicitly related irrigation procedures to rates of clinical infection and/or capsular contracture. Each was compiled into a table in chronological order to make comparisons between the differing irrigation methods. RESULTS Our search returned 239 full-text articles eligible for our review. Two independent screeners identified 9 studies that met the inclusion criteria. This included 1 prospective study and 8 retrospective studies. Two studies reported the use of chlorhexidine gluconate irrigation resulting in protection from clinical infection. Two studies investigated the role of triple antibiotic solution (TAS) either alone or combined with something else on risk of infection, and 3 reported TAS use on rates of capsular contracture. Two additional studies investigated the role of single antibiotic irrigation, concluding that some antibiotic regimen for irrigation may be sufficient in the breast pocket. Interestingly, one study noted the potential use of povidone-iodine (Betadine) as a method of irrigation. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that chlorhexidine gluconate, Betadine, and TAS irrigation of the breast pocket can provide protection against infection and implant loss in both reconstruction and augmentation surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Albert Losken
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Subclinical Infection of the Silicone Breast Implant Surface as a Possible Cause of Capsular Contracture: A Follow-Up. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44:1148-1150. [PMID: 32766898 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-01769-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
15
|
Walker JN, Hanson BM, Myckatyn TM. Commentary on: Optimizing Breast Pocket Irrigation: The Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) Era. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40:626-629. [PMID: 31740924 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjz269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer N Walker
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School; and Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, McGovern Medical School
| | - Blake M Hanson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School; and Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX
| | - Terence M Myckatyn
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Walker JN, Pinkner CL, Lynch AJL, Ortbal S, Pinkner JS, Hultgren SJ, Myckatyn TM. Deposition of Host Matrix Proteins on Breast Implant Surfaces Facilitates Staphylococcus Epidermidis Biofilm Formation: In Vitro Analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40:281-295. [PMID: 30953053 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjz099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Staphylococcus epidermidis is a primary cause of breast implant-associated infection. S epidermidis possesses several virulence factors that enable it to bind both abiotic surfaces and host factors to form a biofilm. In addition S epidermidis colocalizes with matrix proteins coating explanted human breast implants. OBJECTIVES The authors sought to identify matrix proteins that S epidermidis may exploit to infect various breast implant surfaces in vitro. METHODS A combination of in vitro assays was used to characterize S epidermidis strains isolated from human breast implants to gain a better understanding of how these bacteria colonize breast implant surfaces. These included determining the (1) minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations for irrigation solutions commonly used to prevent breast implant contamination; (2) expression and carriage of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin and serine-aspartate repeat proteins, which bind fibrinogen (SdrG) and collagen (SdrF), respectively; and (3) biofilm formation on varying implant surface characteristics, in different growth media, and supplemented with fibrinogen and Types I and III collagen. Scanning electron microscopy and immunofluorescence staining analyses were performed to corroborate findings from these assays. RESULTS Textured breast implant surfaces support greater bacterial biofilm formation at baseline, and the addition of collagen significantly increases biomass on all surfaces tested. We found that S epidermidis isolated from breast implants all encoded SdrF. Consistent with this finding, these strains had a clear affinity for Type I collagen, forming dense, highly structured biofilms in its presence. CONCLUSIONS The authors found that S epidermidis may utilize SdrF to interact with Type I collagen to form biofilm on breast implant surfaces. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sarah Ortbal
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Discussion: The Questionable Role of Antibiotic Irrigation in Breast Augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144:253-257. [PMID: 31246842 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000005727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
18
|
|
19
|
Swanson E. Concerns Regarding Antibiotic-Impregnated Mesh in Breast Augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39:NP90-NP92. [PMID: 30753278 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjy259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Swanson
- Plastic surgeon in private practice in Leawood, KS
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Enhanced recovery pathways are a well-described perioperative healthcare program involving evidence-based interventions. Enhanced recovery is designed to standardize techniques such as drug selection and nerve blocks in order to speed recovery and reduce overall hospital costs. RECENT FINDINGS A PubMed literature search was performed for articles that included the terms enhanced recovery and breast reconstruction surgery. The present investigation summarizes enhanced recovery literature related to breast surgery with a focus on breast reconstruction. Enhanced recovery considerations discussed in this review include patient education, preadmission optimization, perforator flap planning, anesthetic techniques, optimized fasting, venous thrombosis prophylaxis, early mobilization, and antimicrobial prophylaxis.
Collapse
|
21
|
The Detection of Bacteria and Matrix Proteins on Clinically Benign and Pathologic Implants. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2019; 7:e2037. [PMID: 30881821 PMCID: PMC6416121 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: Bacterial contamination of breast implants causes infection, can lead to capsular contracture, and is implicated in breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Bacteria, however, also colonize clinically benign breast implants and little is known about the biologic signals that trigger the switch from a benign to pathologic state. Methods: Explanted smooth as well as Biocell and Siltex textured breast implants associated with clinically normal and pathologic conditions were analyzed in this observational study. Immunofluorescence and bacterial culture techniques were performed. To avoid sampling bias, implant surfaces >25 sq cm were analyzed. Results: Bacteria were detected on 9 of 22 clinically normal explanted devices or periprosthetic capsules, including 40% of Biocell tissue expanders and 75% of Biocell textured implants. Staphylococcus epidermidis was identified in 67% of the bacteria-positive capsular contractures. Fibrinogen was present on 17 of 18, and collagen on 13 of 18 analyzed breast implants. S. epidermidis co-localized with collagen, while group B streptococci and Klebsiella pneumoniae co-localized with fibrinogen. Conclusions: Bacteria are often detectable on clinically benign breast implants when a multimodal approach is applied to a substantial proportion of the device surface to avoid sampling bias. The impact of bacteria on breast implant pathology should be studied in the presence of an adequate negative control group to account for clinically benign bacteria. Disruption of the interaction of bacteria with matrix proteins coating the surface of breast implants may represent a nonantibiotic strategy for the prevention of breast implant bacterial contamination.
Collapse
|
22
|
Nipple shields and antibiotic prophylaxis in skin and nipple sparing risk reducing mastectomies—a multi-centre study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s00238-017-1367-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
23
|
|
24
|
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practice Patterns in Breast Augmentation: A National Survey of Current Practice. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 78:629-632. [PMID: 27922894 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000000942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast augmentation is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic surgery procedures worldwide. Bacterial contamination is of paramount concern due to its role in biofilm formation and capsular contracture. Plastic surgeons have adopted a variety of perioperative interventions in efforts to reduce implant contamination, however definitive evidence supporting these practices is lacking. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to assess current practice patterns aimed at reducing implant-related infections in breast augmentation and comparing them to current evidence-based medicine recommendations. METHODS A 20-question survey assessing practices aimed at preventing breast implant associated infections was generated and distributed via SurveyMonkey to members of the American Society of Plastic Surgery whose electronic mail addresses were listed on the American Society of Plastic Surgery member website in April 2015. RESULTS A total of 253 responses were received from the survey. Of the respondents, 81% were in private practice. Respondents averaged 21 ± 9 years in practice, and 69 ± 111 breast augmentations performed per year. A majority of surgeons used Chlorhexidine to prepare the surgical site (45%) and triple antibiotic solution both as a soak for the implant before placement (40%) as well as for implant pocket irrigation (47%). A no-touch technique using the Keller Funnel was adopted by 42% of surgeons. Regarding antibiotic use in the postoperative period, first-generation cephalosporins were used by the majority of respondents (79%), and the most common duration was for 4 to 6 days (45%). CONCLUSIONS Although there is heterogeneity in specific aspects of antimicrobial prophylaxis during breast augmentation, there is a clear trend toward practice modification geared towards preventing bacterial contamination in breast augmentation. Surgeons may benefit from high-level studies designed to create standardized evidence-based practice guidelines.
Collapse
|
25
|
Samargandi OA, Joukhadar N, Al Youha S, Thoma A, Williams J. Antibiotic Irrigation of Pocket for Implant-Based Breast Augmentation to Prevent Capsular Contracture: A Systematic Review. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2018; 26:110-119. [PMID: 29845049 DOI: 10.1177/2292550317747854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In vitro and in vivo studies have described a number of different antibiotic solutions for irrigation of the pocket in implant-based breast augmentation in an attempt to prevent the formation of capsular contracture (CC). Our objective was to evaluate the evidence that antibiotic irrigation reduced the rate of CC. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL was conducted from inception to January 2016. We included studies which examined the use of intraoperative antibiotic irrigation in women undergoing primary breast augmentation. Our primary outcome was the rate of CC. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality using validated tools. Results Seven studies were included in the final analysis: 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 6 non-randomized studies. The mean follow-up ranged from 14 to 72 months. The rate of CC was less than 2% in 8 studies, between 3% and 6% in 4 studies, and 13.9% in 1 study. Included studies demonstrated significant clinical and methodological heterogeneity. The solitary low-quality RCT concluded that antibiotic irrigation was superior to saline irrigation. Three non-randomized studies demonstrated no significant difference in the rate of CC with the use of antibiotics. One non-randomized controlled study showed that the use of mixture of antibiotic and povidone-iodine significantly lowered the rate of CC. Conclusions The available evidence on the use of antibiotic irrigation to prevent CC is weak and it is based on studies with high risk of bias. Methodologically robust studies are necessary to answer the question whether antibiotic breast pocket irrigation prevents CC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osama A Samargandi
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.,Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nadim Joukhadar
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Sarah Al Youha
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Achilleas Thoma
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jason Williams
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Preventing Breast Implant Contamination in Breast Reconstruction: A National Survey of Current Practice. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78:153-156. [PMID: 27464530 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000000822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implant-based breast reconstruction is commonly performed by plastic surgeons worldwide. Bacterial contamination is of paramount concern because of its role in biofilm formation and capsular contracture. Plastic surgeons have adopted a variety of perioperative interventions in efforts to reduce implant contamination; however, definitive evidence supporting these practices is lacking. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to assess current practice patterns aimed at reducing implant-related infections. METHODS A 20-question survey assessing practices aimed at preventing breast implant-associated infections was generated and distributed via SurveyMonkey to members of the American Society of Plastic Surgery whose e-mail addresses were listed on the American Society of Plastic Surgery member Web site in April 2015. RESULTS A total of 1979 invitations to participate in the survey were sent, and 253 responses were received during the 4-month study period. Of respondents, 81% were in private practice. Respondents averaged 21 ± 9 years in practice, and 34 ± 50 implant-based breast reconstructions were performed per year. A majority of surgeons used chlorhexidine to prepare the surgical site (52%), a triple antibiotic soak for the implant prior to placement (50%) and povidone-iodine for implant pocket irrigation (44%). A no-touch technique utilizing the Keller funnel was adopted by 69% of surgeons. Regarding antibiotic use in the postoperative period, first-generation cephalosporins (eg, cephalexin, cefadroxil) were used by a majority of surgeons (84%), and the most common duration was until drain removal (45%). CONCLUSIONS There is considerable heterogeneity in surgical practices aimed at preventing bacterial contamination in implant-based breast reconstruction. Surgeons may benefit from high-level studies designed to create standardized evidence-based practice guidelines.
Collapse
|
27
|
Swanson E. Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL): Why the Search for an Infectious Etiology May Be Irrelevant. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37:NP118-NP121. [PMID: 29025238 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjx108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
28
|
Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Breast Reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139:1056e-1071e. [PMID: 28445352 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000003242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 205] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery following surgery can be achieved through the introduction of evidence-based perioperative maneuvers. This review aims to present a consensus for optimal perioperative management of patients undergoing breast reconstructive surgery and to provide evidence-based recommendations for an enhanced perioperative protocol. METHODS A systematic review of meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large prospective cohorts was conducted for each protocol element. Smaller prospective cohorts and retrospective cohorts were considered only when higher level evidence was unavailable. The available literature was graded by an international panel of experts in breast reconstructive surgery and used to form consensus recommendations for each topic. Each recommendation was graded following a consensus discussion among the expert panel. Development of these recommendations was endorsed by the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Society. RESULTS High-quality randomized controlled trial data in patients undergoing breast reconstruction informed some of the recommendations; however, for most items, data from lower level studies in the population of interest were considered along with extrapolated data from high-quality studies in non-breast reconstruction populations. Recommendations were developed for a total of 18 unique enhanced recovery after surgery items and are discussed in the article. Key recommendations support use of opioid-sparing perioperative medications, minimal preoperative fasting and early feeding, use of anesthetic techniques that decrease postoperative nausea and vomiting and pain, use of measures to prevent intraoperative hypothermia, and support of early mobilization after surgery. CONCLUSION Based on the best available evidence for each topic, a consensus review of optimal perioperative care for patients undergoing breast reconstruction is presented. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, V.
Collapse
|
29
|
|
30
|
Deva AK. Reply: Textured Breast Implants, Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma, and Conflict of Interest. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139:559e-560e. [PMID: 28121901 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000002967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anand K Deva
- Macquarie Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Macquarie University Clinic, Suite 301, 2 Technology Place, Macquarie Park, New South Wales 2109, Australia,
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Open Capsulotomy: An Effective but Overlooked Treatment for Capsular Contracture after Breast Augmentation. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2016; 4:e1096. [PMID: 27826488 PMCID: PMC5096543 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000001096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2016] [Accepted: 08/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: The prevailing theory for capsular contracture after breast augmentation is a subclinical capsular infection. A capsulectomy, site change, and implant replacement are recommended. An open capsulotomy leaves the capsule in the patient. Theoretically, such a procedure would be ineffective because it does not remove the infected tissue. Recurrences occurred frequently in women treated in the 1970s when leaky silicone gel implants were in use. Open capsulotomy has not been studied in women implanted with third-generation devices. Methods: Seventy-five consecutive women with Baker III/IV capsular contractures after breast augmentation treated with open capsulotomies between 1996 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. The original implants were usually saline-filled (72.2%). Replacements were all smooth and round, and 92.6% were also saline-filled. Results: Seventeen women (22.7%) developed a recurrent capsular contracture. Two patients (2.7%) experienced a second recurrence. Patients with ruptured silicone gel implants (n = 13) had a significantly greater risk of recurrence (P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in recurrence rates comparing patients whose intact implants were reinserted (12.5%) with women whose intact implants were replaced (18.2%). Povidone–iodine irrigation did not affect the recurrence rate. Capsular contracture was corrected with 1 procedure in 77.3% of patients and 2 procedures in 97.3% of patients. Conclusions: Open capsulotomy is a safe and effective treatment that avoids the additional morbidity and cost of a capsulectomy. The findings challenge the infected biofilm theory of capsular contracture. Open capsulotomy deserves reconsideration by plastic surgeons.
Collapse
|
32
|
Capsular Contracture after Breast Augmentation: An Update for Clinical Practice. Arch Plast Surg 2015; 42:532-43. [PMID: 26430623 PMCID: PMC4579163 DOI: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 209] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2015] [Revised: 04/09/2015] [Accepted: 04/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Capsular contracture is the most common complication following implant based breast surgery and is one of the most common reasons for reoperation. Therefore, it is important to try and understand why this happens, and what can be done to reduce its incidence. A literature search using the MEDLINE database was conducted including search terms 'capsular contracture breast augmentation', 'capsular contracture pathogenesis', 'capsular contracture incidence', and 'capsular contracture management', which yielded 82 results which met inclusion criteria. Capsular contracture is caused by an excessive fibrotic reaction to a foreign body (the implant) and has an overall incidence of 10.6%. Risk factors that were identified included the use of smooth (vs. textured) implants, a subglandular (vs. submuscular) placement, use of a silicone (vs. saline) filled implant and previous radiotherapy to the breast. The standard management of capsular contracture is surgical via a capsulectomy or capsulotomy. Medical treatment using the off-label leukotriene receptor antagonist Zafirlukast has been reported to reduce severity and help prevent capsular contracture from forming, as has the use of acellular dermal matrices, botox and neopocket formation. However, nearly all therapeutic approaches are associated with a significant rate of recurrence. Capsular contracture is a multifactorial fibrotic process the precise cause of which is still unknown. The incidence of contracture developing is lower with the use of textured implants, submuscular placement and the use of polyurethane coated implants. Symptomatic capsular contracture is usually managed surgically, however recent research has focussed on preventing capsular contracture from occurring, or treating it with autologous fat transfer.
Collapse
|
33
|
Poppler L, Cohen J, Dolen UC, Schriefer AE, Tenenbaum MM, Deeken C, Chole RA, Myckatyn TM. Histologic, Molecular, and Clinical Evaluation of Explanted Breast Prostheses, Capsules, and Acellular Dermal Matrices for Bacteria. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35:653-68. [PMID: 26229126 PMCID: PMC4649701 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjv017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subclinical infections, manifest as biofilms, are considered an important cause of capsular contracture. Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are frequently used in revision surgery to prevent recurrent capsular contractures. OBJECTIVE We sought to identify an association between capsular contracture and biofilm formation on breast prostheses, capsules, and ADMs in a tissue expander/implant (TE/I) exchange clinical paradigm. METHODS Biopsies of the prosthesis, capsule, and ADM from patients (N = 26) undergoing TE/I exchange for permanent breast implant were evaluated for subclinical infection. Capsular contracture was quantified with Baker Grade and intramammary pressure. Biofilm formation was evaluated with specialized cultures, rtPCR, bacterial taxonomy, live:dead staining, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Collagen distribution, capsular histology, and ADM remodeling were quantified following fluorescent and light microscopy. RESULTS Prosthetic devices were implanted from 91 to 1115 days. Intramammary pressure increased with Baker Grade. Of 26 patients evaluated, one patient had a positive culture and one patient demonstrated convincing evidence of biofilm morphology on SEM. Following PCR amplification 5 samples randomly selected for 16S rRNA gene sequencing demonstrated an abundance of suborder Micrococcineae, consistent with contamination. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that bacterial biofilms likely contribute to a proportion, but not all diagnosed capsular contractures. Biofilm formation does not appear to differ significantly between ADMs or capsules. While capsular contracture remains an incompletely understood but common problem in breast implant surgery, advances in imaging, diagnostic, and molecular techniques can now provide more sophisticated insights into the pathophysiology of capsular contracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Therapeutic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Poppler
- Drs Poppler and Dr Cohen are Residents, Dr Dolen is a Breast Fellow, Dr Tenenbaum is Residency Program Director and Assistant Professor, and Dr Myckatyn is Breast Fellowship Director and Associate Professor, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Mr. Schriefer is a Physicist, Genome Technology Access Center, Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Dr Deeken is Director of Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. and Dr Chole is Lindburg Professor and Chairman, Department of Otolaryngology, and Director of the Biofilm Core Facility, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Justin Cohen
- Drs Poppler and Dr Cohen are Residents, Dr Dolen is a Breast Fellow, Dr Tenenbaum is Residency Program Director and Assistant Professor, and Dr Myckatyn is Breast Fellowship Director and Associate Professor, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Mr. Schriefer is a Physicist, Genome Technology Access Center, Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Dr Deeken is Director of Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. and Dr Chole is Lindburg Professor and Chairman, Department of Otolaryngology, and Director of the Biofilm Core Facility, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Utku Can Dolen
- Drs Poppler and Dr Cohen are Residents, Dr Dolen is a Breast Fellow, Dr Tenenbaum is Residency Program Director and Assistant Professor, and Dr Myckatyn is Breast Fellowship Director and Associate Professor, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Mr. Schriefer is a Physicist, Genome Technology Access Center, Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Dr Deeken is Director of Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. and Dr Chole is Lindburg Professor and Chairman, Department of Otolaryngology, and Director of the Biofilm Core Facility, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Andrew E Schriefer
- Drs Poppler and Dr Cohen are Residents, Dr Dolen is a Breast Fellow, Dr Tenenbaum is Residency Program Director and Assistant Professor, and Dr Myckatyn is Breast Fellowship Director and Associate Professor, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Mr. Schriefer is a Physicist, Genome Technology Access Center, Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Dr Deeken is Director of Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. and Dr Chole is Lindburg Professor and Chairman, Department of Otolaryngology, and Director of the Biofilm Core Facility, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Marissa M Tenenbaum
- Drs Poppler and Dr Cohen are Residents, Dr Dolen is a Breast Fellow, Dr Tenenbaum is Residency Program Director and Assistant Professor, and Dr Myckatyn is Breast Fellowship Director and Associate Professor, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Mr. Schriefer is a Physicist, Genome Technology Access Center, Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Dr Deeken is Director of Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. and Dr Chole is Lindburg Professor and Chairman, Department of Otolaryngology, and Director of the Biofilm Core Facility, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Corey Deeken
- Drs Poppler and Dr Cohen are Residents, Dr Dolen is a Breast Fellow, Dr Tenenbaum is Residency Program Director and Assistant Professor, and Dr Myckatyn is Breast Fellowship Director and Associate Professor, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Mr. Schriefer is a Physicist, Genome Technology Access Center, Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Dr Deeken is Director of Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. and Dr Chole is Lindburg Professor and Chairman, Department of Otolaryngology, and Director of the Biofilm Core Facility, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Richard A Chole
- Drs Poppler and Dr Cohen are Residents, Dr Dolen is a Breast Fellow, Dr Tenenbaum is Residency Program Director and Assistant Professor, and Dr Myckatyn is Breast Fellowship Director and Associate Professor, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Mr. Schriefer is a Physicist, Genome Technology Access Center, Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Dr Deeken is Director of Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. and Dr Chole is Lindburg Professor and Chairman, Department of Otolaryngology, and Director of the Biofilm Core Facility, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Terence M Myckatyn
- Drs Poppler and Dr Cohen are Residents, Dr Dolen is a Breast Fellow, Dr Tenenbaum is Residency Program Director and Assistant Professor, and Dr Myckatyn is Breast Fellowship Director and Associate Professor, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Mr. Schriefer is a Physicist, Genome Technology Access Center, Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Dr Deeken is Director of Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. and Dr Chole is Lindburg Professor and Chairman, Department of Otolaryngology, and Director of the Biofilm Core Facility, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|