Shoulder Dystocia: Incidence and Risk Factors

Pitfalls in the diagnostics of shoulder dystocia: an analysis based on the scrutiny of 2274 deliveries

PURPOSE

Shoulder dystocia is an obstetric emergency with severe complications. Our objective was to evaluate the major pitfalls in the diagnostics of shoulder dystocia, diagnostic descriptions documented in medical records, use of obstetric maneuvers, and their correlations to Erb's and Klumpke's palsy and the use of ICD-10 code 066.0.

METHODS

A retrospective, register-based case-control study included all deliveries (n = 181 352) in Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS) area in 2006-2015. Potential shoulder dystocia cases (n = 1708) were identified from the Finnish Medical Birth Register and the Hospital Discharge Register using ICD-10 codes O66.0, P13.4, P14.0, and P14.1. After thorough assessment of all medical records, 537 shoulder dystocia cases were confirmed. Control group consisted of 566 women without any of these ICD-10 codes.

RESULTS

The pitfalls in the diagnostic included suboptimal following of guidelines for making the diagnosis of shoulder dystocia, subjective interpretation of diagnostic criteria, and inexact or inadequate documentation in medical records. The diagnostic descriptions in medical record were highly inconsistent. The use of obstetric maneuvers was suboptimal among shoulder dystocia cases (57.5%). Overall, the use of obstetric maneuvers increased during the study period (from 25.7 to 97.0%, p < 0.001), which was associated with decreasing rate of Erb's palsy and increasing use of ICD-10 code O66.0.

CONCLUSION

There are diagnostic pitfalls, which could be addressed by education regarding shoulder dystocia guidelines, by improved use obstetric maneuvers, and more precise documentation. The increased use of obstetric maneuvers was associated with lower rates of Erb's palsy and improved coding of shoulder dystocia.

Neonatal birth trauma and associated factors in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Neonatal birth trauma, although it has steadily decreased in industrialized nations, constitutes a significant health burden in low-resource settings. Keeping with this, we sought to determine the pooled cumulative incidence (incidence proportion) of birth trauma and identify potential contributing factors in low and middle-income countries. Besides, we aimed to describe the temporal trend, clinical pattern, and immediate adverse neonatal outcomes of birth trauma. We searched articles published in the English language in the Excerpta Medica database, PubMed, Web of Science, Google, African Journals Online, Google Scholar, Scopus, and in the reference list of retrieved articles. Literature search strategies were developed using medical subject headings and text words related to the outcomes of the study. The Joana Briggs Institute quality assessment tool was employed and articles with appraisal scores of seven or more were deemed suitable to be included in the meta-analysis. Data were analyzed using the random-effect Dersimonian-Laird model. The full search identified a total of 827 articles about neonatal birth trauma. Of these, 37 articles involving 365,547 participants met the inclusion criteria. The weighted pooled cumulative incidence of birth trauma was estimated at 34 per 1,000 live births (95% confidence interval (CI) 30.5 to 38.5) with the highest incidence observed in Africa at 52.9 per 1,000 live births (95% CI 46.5 to 59.4). Being born to a mother from rural areas (odds ratio (OR), 1.61; 95% CI1.18 to 2.21); prolonged labor (OR, 5.45; 95% CI 2.30, 9.91); fetal malpresentation at delivery (OR, 4.70; 95% CI1.75 to 12.26); shoulder dystocia (OR, 6.11; 95% CI3.84 to 9.74); operative vaginal delivery (assisted vacuum or forceps extraction) (OR, 3.19; 95% CI 1.92 to 5.31); and macrosomia (OR, 5.06; 95% CI 2.76 to 9.29) were factors associated with neonatal birth trauma. In conclusion, we found a considerably high incidence proportion of neonatal birth trauma in low and middle-income countries. Therefore, early identification of risk factors and prompt decisions on the mode of delivery can potentially contribute to the decreased magnitude and impacts of neonatal birth trauma and promote the newborn's health.

Maternal and neonatal complications of shoulder dystocia with a focus on obstetric maneuvers: A case-control study of 1103 deliveries

INTRODUCTION

Shoulder dystocia is a severe obstetric emergency that can cause substantial neonatal and maternal complications. This study aims to assess the performed obstetric maneuvers and their frequency, success, and association with maternal and neonatal complication rates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study population was collected among all deliveries in the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa between 2006 and 2015 (n = 181 352) by searching for ICD-10 codes for shoulder dystocia, brachial plexus injury and clavicle fracture. Shoulder dystocia cases (n = 537) were identified by reviewing the medical records. Shoulder dystocia cases treated with one or two maneuvers were compared with those treated with at least three. Medical records of a matched control group constituting of 566 parturients without any of the forementioned ICD-10 codes were also scrutinized.

RESULTS

Using the four most common obstetric maneuvers (McRoberts maneuver, suprapubic pressure, rotational maneuvers, the delivery of the posterior arm) significantly increased during the study period with individual success rates of 61.0%, 71.9%, 68.1% and 84.8%, respectively. Concurrently, the rate of brachial plexus injury and combined neonatal morbidity significantly declined from 50% to 24.2% (p = 0.02) and from 91.4% to 48.5% (p < 0.001). Approximately 75% of shoulder dystocia cases treated with maneuvers were resolved by the McRoberts maneuver and/or suprapubic pressure, but each of the four most performed maneuvers significantly increased the cumulative success rate individually and statistically (p < 0.001). The rates of brachial plexus injury and combined neonatal morbidity were at their highest (52.9% and 97.8%) when none of the maneuvers were performed and at their lowest when two maneuvers were performed (43.0% and 65.4%). The increasing number (≥3) of maneuvers did not affect the combined maternal or neonatal morbidity or brachial plexus injury but increased the risk for third- or fourth-degree lacerations (odds ratio 2.91, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 7.24).

CONCLUSIONS

The increased use of obstetric maneuvers during the study period was associated with decreasing rates of neonatal complications; conversely, the lack of obstetric maneuvers was associated with the highest rate of neonatal complications. These emphasize the importance of education, maneuver training and urgently performing shoulder dystocia maneuvers according to the international protocol guidelines.

Studying the Effects of Shoulder Dystocia and Neonate-Focused Delivery Maneuvers on Brachial Plexus Strain: A Computational Study

The purpose of this computational study was to investigate the effects of neonate-focused clinical delivery maneuvers on brachial plexus (BP) during shoulder dystocia. During shoulder dystocia, the anterior shoulder of the neonate is obstructed behind the symphysis pubis of the maternal pelvis, postdelivery of the neonate's head. This is managed by a series of clinical delivery maneuvers. The goal of this study was to simulate these delivery maneuvers and study their effects on neonatal BP strain. Using madymo models of a maternal pelvis and a 90th-percentile neonate, various delivery maneuvers and positions were simulated including the lithotomy position alone of the maternal pelvis, delivery with the application of various suprapubic pressures (SPPs), neonate in an oblique position, and during posterior arm delivery maneuver. The resulting BP strain (%) along with the required maternal delivery force was reported in these independently simulated scenarios. The lithotomy position alone served as the baseline. Each of the successive maneuvers reported a decrease in the required delivery force and resulting neonatal BP strain. As the applied SPP force increased (three scenarios simulated), the required maternal delivery force and neonatal BP strain decreased. A further decrease in both delivery force and neonatal BP strain was observed in the oblique position, with the lowest delivery force and neonatal BP strain reported during the posterior arm delivery maneuver. Data obtained from the improved computational models in this study enhance our understanding of the effects of clinical maneuvers on neonatal BP strain during complicated birthing scenarios such as shoulder dystocia.

The multifactor pelvis: An alternative to the adaptationist approach of the obstetrical dilemma

The obstetrical dilemma describes the competing demands that a bipedally adapted pelvis and a large-brained neonate place on human childbirth and is the predominant model within which hypotheses about the evolution of the pelvis are framed. I argue the obstetrical dilemma follows the adaptationist program outlined by Gould and Lewontin in 1979 and should be replaced with a new model, the multifactor pelvis. This change will allow thorough consideration of nonadaptive explanations for the evolution of the human pelvis and avoid negative social impacts from considering human childbirth inherently dangerous. First, the atomization of the pelvis into discrete traits is discussed, after which current evidence for both adaptive and nonadaptive hypotheses is evaluated, including childbirth, locomotion, shared genetics with other traits under selection, evolutionary history, genetic drift, and environmental and epigenetic influences on the pelvis.

Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A two-year pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked disorder resulting in progressive muscle weakness and atrophy, cardiomyopathy, and in late stages, cardiorespiratory impairment, and death. As treatments for DMD have expanded, a DMD newborn screening (NBS) pilot study was conducted in New York State to evaluate the feasibility and benefit of NBS for DMD and to provide an early pre-symptomatic diagnosis.

METHODS

At participating hospitals, newborns were recruited to the pilot study, and consent was obtained to screen the newborn for DMD. The first-tier screen measured creatine kinase-MM (CK-MM) in dried blood spot specimens submitted for routine NBS. Newborns with elevated CK-MM were referred for genetic counseling and genetic testing. The latter included deletion/duplication analysis and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the DMD gene followed by NGS for a panel of neuromuscular conditions if no pathogenic variants were detected in the DMD gene.

RESULTS

In the two-year pilot study, 36,781 newborns were screened with CK-MM. Forty-two newborns (25 male and 17 female) were screen positive and referred for genetic testing. Deletions or duplications in the DMD gene were detected in four male infants consistent with DMD or Becker muscular dystrophy. One female DMD carrier was identified.

INTERPRETATION

This study demonstrated that the state NBS program infrastructure and screening technologies we used are feasible to perform NBS for DMD. With an increasing number of treatment options, the clinical utility of early identification for affected newborns and their families lends support for NBS for this severe disease.

Impact of fetal manipulation on maternal and neonatal severe morbidity during shoulder dystocia management

PURPOSE

There are few data on maternal and neonatal morbidities associated with shoulder dystocia (SD), depending on the use of fetal manipulation (FM). A prior 5-year study was conducted in our center in 2012 for this purpose. Our objective was to compare severe maternal and neonatal morbidities according to FM execution in a larger cohort.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study between 2007 and 2020. SD was considered when additional maneuvers were required to complete a delivery. Severe maternal morbidity was defined as the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Severe neonatal morbidity was defined as Apgar < 7 at 5 min and/or cord arterial pH < 7.1 and/or or a permanent brachial plexus palsy. We studied these data in the FM group compared to the non- FM group.

RESULTS

FM was associated with increased OASI rates (21.1% vs. 3.8%, OR = 6.72 [2.7-15.8]). We found no significant difference in severe neonatal morbidity. Maternal age > 35 and FM appear to be associated with the occurrence of OASI, with ORa = 13.3 [1.5-121.8] and ORa = 5.3 [2.2-12.8], respectively. FM was the only factor associated with the occurrence of severe neonatal morbidity (ORa = 2.3 [1.1-4.8]. The rate of episiotomy was significantly decreased (20% versus 5% p < 0.05) and there was an increase in the rate of SD managed with FM in our center.

CONCLUSION

FM is the only factor associated with an increased risk of OASI. In case of failure of non-FM maneuvers, the rapid implementation of FM maneuvers resulted in no difference regarding severe neonatal morbidity.

Incidence trends of shoulder dystocia and associated risk factors: A nationwide analysis in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To examine recent incidence trends and characteristics of shoulder dystocia.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study querying the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. The study population included 9 913 838 vaginal deliveries for national estimates from January 2016 to December 2019. The main outcome measure was the diagnosis of shoulder dystocia. A binary logistic regression model was used to identify characteristics of shoulder dystocia in multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Shoulder dystocia was reported in 228 120 deliveries (23.0 per 1000). The incidence of shoulder dystocia increased from 21.0 to 24.6 per 1000 deliveries during the 4-year study period (17.1% relative increase, P < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, the recent year of delivery remained an independent factor for shoulder dystocia: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) compared with 2016, 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.11), 1.13 (95% CI, 1.12-1.14), and 1.18 (95% CI, 1.16-1.19) for 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively. Large for gestational age (aOR 4.33 [95% CI, 4.25-4.40]), diabetes mellitus (pregestational aOR, 4.78 [95% CI, 4.63-4.94], and gestational aOR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.66-1.71]), and vacuum-assisted delivery (aOR, 2.18 [95% CI, 2.15-2.21]) exhibited the largest risks for shoulder dystocia.

CONCLUSION

This national-level analysis identified various risk factors for shoulder dystocia and demonstrated that shouder dystocia cases are increasing gradually in the United States.

Cross-Sectional Study of the Frequency and Severity of Traumatic Childbirth Events and How They Affect Maternity Care Clinicians

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency and severity of traumatic childbirth events (TCEs) and how they affected the professional practice and personal lives of maternity care clinicians, including registered nurses (RNs), certified nurse-midwives, attending physicians, and resident physicians.

DESIGN

Descriptive cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Maternity units across five hospitals in the Baltimore metropolitan area.

PARTICIPANTS

Maternity care clinicians (N = 160) including RNs (n = 104), certified nurse-midwives (n = 17), attending physicians (n = 28), and resident physicians (n = 11).

METHODS

Participants completed an online survey to measure the frequency and severity of TCEs and how they affect participants' professional practice and personal lives. We used descriptive statistics to characterize maternity care clinicians and bivariate analysis and linear regression to examine relationships.

RESULTS

Most participants were women (92.5%), White (62.5%), between the ages of 21 and 54 years (89.4%), RNs (65.0%), and employed full-time (79.2%). Shoulder dystocia was the most frequently observed TCE (90.6%), and maternal death was the most severe TCE (M = 4.82, SD = 0.54). Attending physicians (50.0%) reported a significantly greater frequency of exposure to TCEs than the other participants, χ²(6) = 23.8 (n = 159), p <. 001. The frequency of TCEs had a significant medium correlation with perceived effect on professional practice, r(154) = 0.415, p < .001, and personal life, r(155) = 0.386, p < .001. Perception of severity was strongly associated with professional practice, β = 0.52, p < .001, and personal life, β = 0.46, p < .001.

CONCLUSION

If severe, TCE exposure can affect the professional practice and personal life of maternity care clinicians.

Antenatal risk score for prediction of shoulder dystocia with focus on fetal ultrasound data

BACKGROUND

Shoulder dystocia is one of the most threatening complications during delivery, and although it is difficult to predict, individual risk should be considered when counseling for mode of delivery.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and validate a risk score for shoulder dystocia based on fetal ultrasound and maternal data from 15,000 deliveries.

STUDY DESIGN

Data were retrospectively obtained of deliveries in 3 tertiary centers between 2014 and 2017 for the derivation cohort and between 2018 and 2020 for the validation cohort. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancy, vaginal delivery in cephalic presentation at ≥37+0 weeks' gestation, and fetal biometry data available within 2 weeks of delivery. Independent predictors were determined by multivariate regression analysis in the derivation cohort, and a score was developed on the basis of the effect of the predictors.

RESULTS

The derivation cohort consisted of 7396 deliveries with a 0.91% rate of shoulder dystocia, and the validation cohort of 7965 deliveries with a 1.0% rate of shoulder dystocia. Among all women, 13.8% had diabetes mellitus, and 12.1% were obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2). Independent risk factors in the derivation cohort were: estimated fetal weight ≥4250 g (odds ratio, 4.27; P=.002), abdominal-head-circumference ≥2.5 cm (odds ratio, 3.96; P<.001), and diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 2.18; P=.009). On the basis of the strength of effect, a risk score was developed: estimated fetal weight ≥4250 g=2, abdominal-head-circumference ≥2.5 cm=2, and diabetes mellitus=1. The risk score predicted shoulder dystocia with moderate discriminatory ability (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.69; P<.001; area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.71; P<.001) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit; P=.466; P=.167) for the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. With 1 score point, 16 shoulder dystocia cases occurred in 1764 deliveries, with 0.6% shoulder dystocia incidence and a number needed to treat with cesarean delivery to avoid 1 case of shoulder dystocia of 172 (2 points: 38/1809, 2.1%, 48; 3 points: 18/336, 5.4%, 19; 4 points: 10/96, 10.5%, 10; and 5 points: 5/20, 25%, 4); 40.8% of the shoulder dystocia cases occurred without risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The presented risk score for shoulder dystocia may act as a supplemental tool for the clinical decision-making regarding mode of delivery. According to our score model, in pregnancies with a score ≤2, meaning having solely estimated fetal weight ≥4250 g, or abdominal-head-circumference ≥2.5, or diabetes mellitus, cesarean delivery for prevention of shoulder dystocia should not be recommended because of the high number needed to treat to avoid 1 case of shoulder dystocia. Conversely, in patients with a score of ≥4 with or without diabetes mellitus, cesarean delivery may be considered. However, in 40% of the shoulder dystocia cases, no risk factors had been present.

Evaluation of the Effects on Uninfected Pregnant Women and Their Pregnancy Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Beijing, China

Background

People's lifestyles may have changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have a profound impact on pregnant women and newborns. This study aims to assess the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on uninfected pregnant women and their newborns, including potential environmental factors.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the pregnancy complications of 802 cases in the pandemic group and 802 controls in the pre-pandemic group in a matched nested case-control study, and evaluated the association with sociodemographic features, lifestyles, and other factors in 311 pregnant women with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Results

Compared to the pre-pandemic group, the rates of anemia, vaginitis, shoulder dystocia, and adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm birth were increased in the pandemic group. After controlling for the covariates, we observed a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the pandemic group. Pregnant women with adverse pregnancy outcomes had an increased rate of anemia and vaginal candidiasis.

Conclusion

COVID-19 pandemic has profound effects on adverse pregnancy outcomes, suggesting the importance of ensuring regular prenatal checkups and keeping a healthy lifestyle.

Textbook typologies: Challenging the myth of the perfect obstetric pelvis

Medical education's treatment of obstetric-related anatomy exemplifies historical sex bias in medical curricula. Foundational obstetric and midwifery textbooks teach that clinical pelvimetry and the Caldwell-Moloy classification system are used to assess the pelvic capacity of a pregnant patient. We describe the history of these techniques-ostensibly developed to manage arrested labors-and offer the following criticisms. The sample on which these techniques were developed betrays the bias of the authors and does not represent the sample needed to address their interest in obstetric outcomes. Caldwell and Moloy wrote as though the size and shape of the bony pelvis are the primary causes of "difficult birth"; today we know differently, yet books still present their work as relevant. The human obstetric pelvis varies in complex ways that are healthy and normal such that neither individual clinical pelvimetric dimensions nor the artificial typologies developed from these measurements can be clearly correlated with obstetric outcomes. We critique the continued inclusion of clinical pelvimetry and the Caldwell-Moloy classification system in biomedical curricula for the racism that was inherent in the development of these techniques and that has clinical consequences today. We call for textbooks, curricula, and clinical practices to abandon these outdated, racist techniques. In their place, we call for a truly evidence-based practice of obstetrics and midwifery, one based on an understanding of the complexity and variability of the physiology of pregnancy and birth. Instead of using false typologies that lack evidence, this change would empower both pregnant people and practitioners.

Antenatal risk prediction of shoulder dystocia: influence of diabetes and obesity: a multicenter study

PURPOSE

To estimate the risk of shoulder dystocia (SD) in pregnancies with/without maternal diabetes or obesity; to identify antenatal maternal and fetal ultrasound-derived risk factors and calculate their contributions.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective analysis of 13,428 deliveries in three tertiary hospitals (2014-2017) with fetal ultrasound data ≤ 14 days prior to delivery (n = 7396).

INCLUSION CRITERIA

singleton pregnancies in women ≥ 18 years old; vertex presentation; vaginal delivery at ≥ 37 weeks of gestation. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) and birth weight (BW) were categorized by steps of 250 g. To evaluate risk factors, a model was performed using ultrasound data with SD as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

Diabetes was present in 9.3%; BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² in 10.4% and excessive weight gain in 39.8%. The total SD rate was 0.9%, with diabetes 2.0% and with obesity 1.9%. These increased with BW 4250-4499 g compared to 4000-4249 g in women with diabetes (12.1% vs 1.9%, P = 0.010) and without (6.1% vs 1.6%, P < 0.001) and at the same BW threshold for women with obesity (9.6% vs 0.6%, P = 0.002) or without (6.4% vs 1.8%, P < 0.001). Rates increased similarly for EFW at 4250 g and for AC-HC at 2.5 cm. Independent risk factors for SD were EFW ≥ 4250 g (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.5-9.4), AC-HC ≥ 2.5 cm (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.3-7.5) and diabetes (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.0). HC/AC ratio, obesity, excessive weight gain and labor induction were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Independent of diabetes, which remains a risk factor for SD, a significant increase may be expected if the EFW is ≥ 4250 g and AC-HC is ≥ 2.5 cm.

Routine Third Trimester Sonogram: Friend or Foe

Several risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes can be identified by a routine third trimester ultrasound scan. However, there is also potential for harm, anxiety, and additional health care costs through unnecessary intervention due to false positive results. The evidence base informing the balance of risks and benefits of universal screening is inadequate to fully inform decision making. However, data on the diagnostic effectiveness of universal ultrasound suggest that better methods are required to result in net benefit, with the exception of screening for presentation near term, where a clinical and economic case can be made for its implementation.

Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, May 2021

An extensive review of new resources to support the provision of evidence-based care for women and infants. The current column includes a discussion of the prenatal prediction of fetal macrosomia and commentaries on reviews focused on the effects of date palm and dill seed on labor outcomes and the current research available on SARS-CoV-2 and pregnancy outcomes.

Prediction of Birth Weight and Neonatal Adiposity Using Ultrasound Assessment of Soft Tissue Parameters in Addition to Two-Dimensional Conventional Biometry

INTRODUCTION

We aim to evaluate the supplementary predictive value of soft tissue markers, including fetal limb volumes, for fetal birth weight and fat tissue weight.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of 60 patients undergoing term induction of labor. Ultrasound was performed 48 h before birth, and 2D sonographic measurements, subcutaneous tissue thickness, and 3D fetal limb volumes were taken. Birth weight and neonatal fat weight were assessed by plethysmography. Clinical data were collected. The relation between ultrasound and neonatal outcomes was assessed by univariate and multivariate predictive models. The estimated and actual birth weights were compared applying different published formulas, and systematic and random error were collected and compared.

RESULTS

3D fetal limb volumes showed a strong relation to birth weight, absolute weight, and relative fat weight. The Lee 6 formula performed better than either Hadlock 3 or Lee 3 with the lowest random error. Fractional limb volumes involve a highly reproducible technique, with excellent correlation (intra-class coefficient >0.90) for both inter- and intra-observer reliability. The prevalence of estimated EFW measures within 10% error from the actual birth weight was 71.7% with the Hadlock 3 model and 95.0% with the Lee 6 model (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

Late assessment of 3D fetal limb volume in upper and lower extremities is not only useful for accurately predicting birth weight but is a useful marker for prediction of birth fat tissue weight.

Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, pregnant women are screened using ultrasound to perform gestational aging, typically at around 12 weeks' gestation, and around the middle of pregnancy. Ultrasound scans thereafter are performed for clinical indications only.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the case for offering universal late pregnancy ultrasound to all nulliparous women in the UK. The main questions addressed were the diagnostic effectiveness of universal late pregnancy ultrasound to predict adverse outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of either implementing universal ultrasound or conducting further research in this area.

DESIGN

We performed diagnostic test accuracy reviews of five ultrasonic measurements in late pregnancy. We conducted cost-effectiveness and value-of-information analyses of screening for fetal presentation, screening for small for gestational age fetuses and screening for large for gestational age fetuses. Finally, we conducted a survey and a focus group to determine the willingness of women to participate in a future randomised controlled trial.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 2019.

REVIEW METHODS

The protocol for the review was designed a priori and registered. Eligible studies were identified using keywords, with no restrictions for language or location. The risk of bias in studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Health economic modelling employed a decision tree analysed via Monte Carlo simulation. Health outcomes were from the fetal perspective and presented as quality-adjusted life-years. Costs were from the perspective of the public sector, defined as NHS England, and the costs of special educational needs. All costs and quality-adjusted life-years were discounted by 3.5% per annum and the reference case time horizon was 20 years.

RESULTS

Umbilical artery Doppler flow velocimetry, cerebroplacental ratio, severe oligohydramnios and borderline oligohydramnios were all either non-predictive or weakly predictive of the risk of neonatal morbidity (summary positive likelihood ratios between 1 and 2) and were all weakly predictive of the risk of delivering a small for gestational age infant (summary positive likelihood ratios between 2 and 4). Suspicion of fetal macrosomia is strongly predictive of the risk of delivering a large infant, but it is only weakly, albeit statistically significantly, predictive of the risk of shoulder dystocia. Very few studies blinded the result of the ultrasound scan and most studies were rated as being at a high risk of bias as a result of treatment paradox, ascertainment bias or iatrogenic harm. Health economic analysis indicated that universal ultrasound for fetal presentation only may be both clinically and economically justified on the basis of existing evidence. Universal ultrasound including fetal biometry was of borderline cost-effectiveness and was sensitive to assumptions. Value-of-information analysis indicated that the parameter that had the largest impact on decision uncertainty was the net difference in cost between an induced delivery and expectant management.

LIMITATIONS

The primary literature on the diagnostic effectiveness of ultrasound in late pregnancy is weak. Value-of-information analysis may have underestimated the uncertainty in the literature as it was focused on the internal validity of parameters, which is quantified, whereas the greatest uncertainty may be in the external validity to the research question, which is unquantified.

CONCLUSIONS

Universal screening for presentation at term may be justified on the basis of current knowledge. The current literature does not support universal ultrasonic screening for fetal growth disorders.

FUTURE WORK

We describe proof-of-principle randomised controlled trials that could better inform the case for screening using ultrasound in late pregnancy.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017064093.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

The association between a previous uneventful vaginal delivery of a macrosomic neonate and future shoulder dystocia

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between vaginal delivery of a previous macrosomic neonate (birthweight (BW)≥ 4000) among non-diabetic women and the rate of shoulder dystocia (SD) in the subsequent pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

A historical prospective cohort study in a university affiliated medical center from 2005 to 2019. Women who had a singleton pregnancy and two consecutive deliveries in our medical center were included. Women with previous GDM, SD or cesarean delivery were excluded. Univariate analysis was followed by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 38,942 women were included. SD incidence among the subsequent pregnancies was 0.44 % (172 women). In univariate analysis women with previous delivery of large neonates: BW≥90th percentile for gestational age and BW ≥ 4000 g had higher risk for subsequent SD (odds ratio 2.69 [95 % confidence interval 1.89-3.84], p < 0.01 and 2.71 [1.66-4.44], p < 0.01, respectively). However, a backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for significant confounders for SD in the univariate analysis, showed that women with a previous delivery of macrosomic neonate ≥4000 g were not found to have higher or lower risk for SD in the subsequent delivery.

CONCLUSION

Previous uneventful delivery of a macrosomic neonate to a non-diabetic mother should not be regarded as a risk factor for SD in the subsequent delivery.

Rising trends in the incidence of shoulder dystocia and development of a novel shoulder dystocia risk score tool: a nationwide population-based study of 800 484 Finnish deliveries

INTRODUCTION

Shoulder dystocia has remained an unpredictable and feared emergency in obstetrics. Some risk factors have been identified but nevertheless there is a lack of risk evaluation tools in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of shoulder dystocia in the Finnish population and to develop a shoulder dystocia risk score tool.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective, population-based study included all deliveries in Finland between 2004 and 2017 (n = 800 484). The annual numbers of shoulder dystocia diagnoses were gathered from nationwide Finnish Medical Birth Register and Hospital Discharge Register. The incidence of shoulder dystocia was calculated in subgroups according to the mode of delivery, maternal diabetes status, body mass index (BMI), age, parity and gestational age. Based on these numbers, a shoulder dystocia risk score tool was created.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of shoulder dystocia was 0.18%. It increased significantly during the study period from 0.10% to 0.32% (P < .001). More specifically, the incidence increased significantly in all analyzed subgroups except for women with BMI <18.5 or age <20 years. To evaluate the importance of risk factors, practical and simple shoulder dystocia risk score tool was created. Instrumental vaginal delivery, maternal diabetes of any kind, BMI ≥25, age ≥40 years and gestational age ≥41 weeks were associated with higher shoulder dystocia risk compared with non-diabetic, non-obese and younger women with spontaneous deliveries before 41 weeks of gestation. In our risk score tool, cases with shoulder dystocia had a significantly higher number of risk points than those without it (15.2 vs 10.4, P < .001). The risk was significantly high when the scores were ≥18 points (relative risk 9.54, 95% confidence interval 8.61-10.57).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of shoulder dystocia in Finland increased during the study period but it is still low compared with previous studies from other countries. In clinical daily practice, the new shoulder dystocia risk score tool helps to evaluate the individual risk profile of the parturient. According to this risk score tool, the highest risk was found with the combination of instrumental vaginal delivery, maternal diabetes, BMI ≥25, age ≥40 years and gestational age ≥41 weeks.

Universal third-trimester ultrasonic screening using fetal macrosomia in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of screening for macrosomia is not well established. One of the critical elements of an effective screening program is the diagnostic accuracy of a test at predicting the condition. The objective of this study is to investigate the diagnostic effectiveness of universal ultrasonic fetal biometry in predicting the delivery of a macrosomic infant, shoulder dystocia, and associated neonatal morbidity in low- and mixed-risk populations.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We conducted a predefined literature search in Medline, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), the Cochrane library and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 2020. No language restrictions were applied. We included studies where the ultrasound was performed as part of universal screening and those that included low- and mixed-risk pregnancies and excluded studies confined to high risk pregnancies. We used the estimated fetal weight (EFW) (multiple formulas and thresholds) and the abdominal circumference (AC) to define suspected large for gestational age (LGA). Adverse perinatal outcomes included macrosomia (multiple thresholds), shoulder dystocia, and other markers of neonatal morbidity. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Meta-analysis was carried out using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and the bivariate logit-normal (Reitsma) models. We identified 41 studies that met our inclusion criteria involving 112,034 patients in total. These included 11 prospective cohort studies (N = 9986), one randomized controlled trial (RCT) (N = 367), and 29 retrospective cohort studies (N = 101,681). The quality of the studies was variable, and only three studies blinded the ultrasound findings to the clinicians. Both EFW >4,000 g (or 90th centile for the gestational age) and AC >36 cm (or 90th centile) had >50% sensitivity for predicting macrosomia (birthweight above 4,000 g or 90th centile) at birth with positive likelihood ratios (LRs) of 8.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.84-11.17) and 7.56 (95% CI 5.85-9.77), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity at predicting macrosomia, which could reflect the different study designs, the characteristics of the included populations, and differences in the formulas used. An EFW >4,000 g (or 90th centile) had 22% sensitivity at predicting shoulder dystocia with a positive likelihood ratio of 2.12 (95% CI 1.34-3.35). There was insufficient data to analyze other markers of neonatal morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that suspected LGA is strongly predictive of the risk of delivering a large infant in low- and mixed-risk populations. However, it is only weakly (albeit statistically significantly) predictive of the risk of shoulder dystocia. There was insufficient data to analyze other markers of neonatal morbidity.

Maneuvering Through a Birth Complicated by Shoulder Dystocia

Shoulder dystocia is an unpredictable intrapartum emergency with potentially devastating consequences. In this article, the etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical management of shoulder dystocia are reviewed; institutional readiness and potential legal implications are discussed. Also considered are posttraumatic stress disorder and secondary traumatic stress, adverse psychological consequences that may be experienced by women, midwives, and other intrapartum care providers, including staff.

Adenosine kinase and cardiovascular fetal programming in gestational diabetes mellitus

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a detrimental condition for human pregnancy associated with endothelial dysfunction and endothelial inflammation in the fetoplacental vasculature and leads to increased cardio-metabolic risk in the offspring. In the fetoplacental vasculature, GDM is associated with altered adenosine metabolism. Adenosine is an important vasoactive molecule and is an intermediary and final product of transmethylation reactions in the cell. Adenosine kinase is the major regulator of adenosine levels. Disruption of this enzyme is associated with alterations in methylation-dependent gene expression regulation mechanisms, which are associated with the fetal programming phenomenon. Here we propose that cellular and molecular alterations associated with GDM can dysregulate adenosine kinase leading to fetal programming in the fetoplacental vasculature. This can contribute to the cardio-metabolic long-term consequences observed in offspring after exposure to GDM.