A tale of two balloons: technical and procedural difference between cryoballoon systems

Incidence of pulmonary vein stenosis in two types of cryoballoon systems

Background

Currently, two types of cryoballoon (CB) systems are available for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Since the POLARx (Boston Scientific) is softer during freezing than the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro; Medtronic), it tends to go more deeply into the pulmonary vein (PV), risking PV stenosis.

Methods

Ninety-one patients underwent initial CB ablation for paroxysmal AF (AFA-Pro 56; POLARx 35). Twenty-six from each group were extracted using propensity score matching. The PV cross-sectional area (PVA) was measured by tracing the area within the PV plane at 5-mm intervals from the PV ostium in a distal direction for 20 mm or to the bifurcation in each PV. The PVA was compared before and 3 months after ablation.

Results

Time to balloon temperatures of -30 and - 40°C was significantly shorter and the nadir temperature was significantly lower with POLARx than with AFA-Pro. In the left inferior (LI) PV and right superior (RS) PV, the freezing balloon position was significantly deeper in POLARx than in AFA-pro. The freezing position in RSPV with mild to moderate narrowing was deeper than those without (10.2 ± 3.3 mm vs. 8.2 ± 1.8 mm, p = .01). In RSPV, the reduction of PVA tended to be greater with the POLARx than with the AFA-Pro (26.1% ± 14.1% vs. 19.9% ± 10.3%, p = .07).

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the incidence of PV stenosis between POLARx and AFA-Pro. However, if POLARx goes deep into the PVs, we will still have to be careful.

PolarX vs Arctic Front for Cryoballoon Ablation of Paroxysmal AF: The Randomized COMPARE CRYO Study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Cryoballoon ablation using the Arctic Front cryoballoon (Medtronic) was found to be superior to antiarrhythmic drug treatment. Recently, a novel cryoballoon system was introduced (PolarX, Boston Scientific).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the 2 cryoballoons in a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF were enrolled in 2 centers and randomized 1:1 to pulmonary vein isolation using the PolarX or the Arctic Front cryoballoon. All patients received an implantable cardiac monitor. The primary endpoint was first recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia [AT]) between days 91 and 365. Procedural safety was assessed by a composite of tamponade, phrenic nerve palsy lasting >24 hours, vascular complications, stroke/transient ischemic attack, atrioesophageal fistula or death up to 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients were enrolled. At 1 year, recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia had occurred in 41 of 99 patients (41.6%) assigned to the PolarX group and in 48 of 102 patients (47.1%) assigned to the Arctic Front group (HR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.56-1.30]; P = 0.03 for noninferiority; P = 0.46 for superiority). The safety endpoint occurred in 5 patients (5%) in the PolarX group (n = 5 phrenic nerve palsies lasting >24 hours), whereas no safety endpoints occurred in the Arctic Front group (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized controlled trial using implantable cardiac monitors for continuous rhythm monitoring, the novel PolarX cryoballoon was noninferior compared with the Arctic Front cryoballoon regarding efficacy. However, the PolarX balloon resulted in significantly more phrenic nerve palsies. (Comparison of PolarX and the Arctic Front Cryoballoons for PVI in Patients With Symptomatic Paroxysmal AF [COMPARE-CRYO]; NCT04704986).

Incidence of cryoballoon expansion dislodgement during pulmonary vein isolation-An underappreciated frequent cause of incomplete isolation

BACKGROUND

Cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) requires adequate contact between the pulmonary vein (PV) antrum and cryoballoon. The surge of intraballoon pressure during the initial phase of ablation may change the balloon's shape and compliance, resulting in balloon dislodgement and loss of PV occlusion. Without continuous monitoring, this phenomenon is often undetected but can be associated with incomplete PV isolation (PVI).

METHODS

Primary cryoablation of AF was performed in 15 patients. PV occlusion status pre- and post-freezing were analyzed with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and dielectric imaging-based occlusion tool (DIOT) to calculate the incidence of expansion dislodgement of cryoballoon.

RESULTS

A total of 105 cryoablation applications were performed on 57 veins, including three common ostiums of left pulmonary veins. In the evaluation of PV occlusion, both modalities reported consistent results in 86.7% of the assessments. Despite complete PV occlusion before ablation, peri-balloon leak after initiation of freezing was detected by ICE in 5/22 (22.7%) applications and by DIOT in 8/25 (32%) applications.

CONCLUSION

Incidence of expansion dislodgement of the cryoballoon was detected in one-fourth to one-third of cryoablation applications depending on the imaging modality used, which was clinically frequent and significant.

Current Balloon Devices for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Balloon-based catheter ablation is a valuable option for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) because contiguous lesions can be created to achieve pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and the method is less dependent than traditional ablation methods on the operator's skill and experience. Cryoballoon ablation is used universally worldwide, with its efficacy and safety being comparable to the efficacy and safety of standard radiofrequency ablation, and the procedure can be completed in a relatively short time. Hot balloon ablation was developed in Japan. The balloon maintains its compliance even during the energy delivery, and a large areal ablation lesion is created. Furthermore, the hot balloon system is the only system for which oesophageal cooling is a standard feature. Laser balloon ablation, which is performed under direct endoscopic vision, has proven to be effective and safe for achieving a PVI. The laser balloon system provides an improved field of view and automated circumferential ablation for a rapid and effective PVI. The authors have reviewed the currently available balloon systems as used for AF ablation, i.e., PVI, and have provided detailed insight and perspectives on the currently available cryoballoon and hot balloon technologies, plus laser balloon technology.

Difference in tissue temperature change between two cryoballoons

BACKGROUND

Cryoballoon ablation, especially Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA), has been widely recognised as a standard approach to atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, Boston Scientific has released a novel cryoballoon system (POLARx). Despite comparable acute clinical outcomes of these two cryoballoons, the recent study reported a higher complication rate, especially for phrenic nerve palsy, with POLARx. However, their impact on biological tissue remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study is to evaluate temperature change of biological tissue during cryoablation of each cryoballoon using a porcine experimental model.

METHOD

A tissue-based pulmonary vein model was constructed from porcine myocardial tissue and placed on a stage designed to simulate pulmonary vein anatomy and venous flow. Controlled cryoablations of AFA-Pro and POLARx were performed in this model to evaluate the tissue temperature. A temperature sensor was set behind the muscle and cryoballoon ablation was performed after confirming the occlusion of pulmonary vein with cryoballoon.

RESULTS

The mean tissue nadir temperature during cryoablation with AFA-Pro was -41.5°C±4.9°C, while the mean tissue nadir temperature during cryoablation with POLARx was -58.4°C±5.9°C (p<0.001). The mean balloon nadir temperature during cryoablation with AFA-Pro was -54.6°C±2.6°C and the mean balloon nadir temperature during cryoablation with POLARx was -64.7°C±3.8°C (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

POLARx could freeze the biological tissue more strongly than AFA-Pro.

Efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation vs. novel cryoballoon ablation system for atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel treatment technology for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Cryoballoon (CB) is the most frequently used single shot technology. A direct comparison to a novel CB system is lacking. We aimed to compare pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using PFA vs. a novel CB system regarding efficiency, safety, myocardial injury, and outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-one consecutive patients underwent PVI and were included (age 64 ± 9.7 years, ejection fraction 0.58 ± 0.09, left atrial size 40 ± 6.4 mm, paroxysmal AF 64%). 106 patients (59%) underwent PFA (FARAPULSE, Boston Scientific) and 75 patients (41%) underwent CB ablation (PolarX, Boston Scientific). The median procedure time, left atrial dwell time and fluoroscopic time were similar between the PFA and the CB group with 55 [interquartile range (IQR) 43-64] min vs. 58 (IQR 48-69) min (P < 0.087), 38 (30-49) min vs. 37 (31-48) min, (P = 0.871), and 11 (IQR 9.3-14) min vs. 11 (IQR 8.7-16) min, (P < 0.81), respectively. Three procedural complications were observed in the PFA group (two tamponades, one temporary ST elevation) and three complications in the CB group (3× reversible phrenic nerve palsies). During the median follow-up of 404 days (IQR 208-560), AF recurrence was similar in the PFA group and the CB group with 24 vs. 30%, P = 0.406.

CONCLUSION

Procedural characteristics were very similar between PFA and CB in regard to procedure duration fluoroscopy time and complications. Atrial fibrillation free survival did not differ between the PFA and CB groups.

Efficacy and safety of a novel cryoballoon ablation system: multicentre comparison of 1-year outcome

AIMS

The aim of the study was to compare the 1-year efficacy and safety of a novel cryoballoon (NCB) ablation system (POLARx; Boston Scientific) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) compared with the standard cryoballoon (SCB) system (Arctic Front, Medtronic).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PVI using the NCB and the SCB at two centres were included. We report 1-year efficacy after 12 months, short-term safety and hospitalizations within the blanking period, and predictors for AF recurrence. In case of repeat procedures, pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns were characterized. Eighty patients (age 66 ± 10 years, ejection fraction 57 ± 10%, left atrial volume index 39 ± 13 mL/m2, paroxysmal AF in 64%) were studied. After a single procedure and a follow-up of 12 months, 68% in the NCB group and 70% in the SCB group showed no recurrence of AF/atrial tachycardias (P = 0.422). One patient in the NCB group suffered a periprocedural stroke with full recovery. There were no differences regarding hospitalizations during follow-up between the groups. PV reconnection observed during 12 repeat procedures (4 NCB, 8 SCB) pattern was comparable between the groups with more reconnections in the right-sided compared with the left-sided PVs.

CONCLUSION

In this multicentre study comparing two currently available cryoballoon ablation systems for PVI, no differences were observed in the efficacy and safety during a follow-up of 12 months.

Evaluation of the direction and extent of ice formation during cryoballoon ablation: an experimental study

BACKGROUND

The distal hemisphere of a balloon is generally cooled during cryoapplication. However, a wide ablation area can be acquired after cryoballoon ablation. This study aimed to evaluate the extent of ice formation on two types of balloon surfaces through experimental and simulation studies.

METHODS

A standard cryoballoon (SCB; Arctic Front Advance Pro, Medtronic) and novel cryoballoon (NCB; POLARx, Boston Scientific) were frozen for 240 s in 36 °C normal saline solution to observe ice formation on the balloon surface. Pieces of porcine tissue were placed between the upper and lower sides of the balloon, and the balloon was frozen in the horizontal direction for 240 s in 20 attempts (10 for SCB and NCB each). The measured areas of ice formation were evaluated and compared between the upper and lower sides of each balloon.

RESULTS

Ice formation was greater on the lower side of the balloon than on the upper side. A larger area of ice formation in the tissue slab was observed on the lower side than on the upper side in both balloons, and the ice formation extended to the proximal hemisphere on the lower side of the balloon. The ice formation area in the NCB was significantly larger than that in SCB.

CONCLUSIONS

Ice formation was significantly greater on the lower side of the cryoballoon than on the upper side and extended to the proximal hemisphere of the balloon, which might facilitate the acquisition of a wide ablation area on the left atrial posterior wall after cryoballoon ablation. Different ice formation after cryoballoon ablation Greater ice formation on the lower side of cryoballoon and an extensive ice formation in the proximal hemisphere, especially in novel cryoballoon.