Blood pressure and risk of breast cancer, overall and by subtypes: a prospective cohort study

Role of Serum Lipids, Blood Glucose and Blood Pressure in Breast Cancer Risk for Women with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

PURPOSE

Women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of breast cancer. We aimed to determine the contribution of lipids, glucose and blood pressure to this risk based on the multifactorial nature of T2DM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This population-based cohort study used data from a Dutch database (the Groningen Initiative to Analyse Type 2 Diabetes Treatment) for the period 2004-2013. The cohort included women diagnosed with T2DM, aged 30-80 years, with no history of breast cancer and with follow-up data for at least 1 year. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the associations of exposures with breast cancer occurrence, reporting adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Exposures of interest included total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides, glycated hemoglobin A (HbA1c) and systolic blood pressure (SBP).

RESULTS

During a median of 4.45 years' follow-up, 183 of 10,183 included women received a breast cancer diagnosis. We observed U-shaped associations with breast cancer incidence for total cholesterol and HDL-C at baseline. Compared with moderate elevations, women had significantly higher breast cancer risks associated with high total cholesterol (aHR, 95% CI: 1.72, 1.15-2.55) and HDL-C (aHR, 95% CI: 1.74, 1.18-2.58) levels, while low total cholesterol (aHR, 95% CI: 1.43, 0.94-2.19) and HDL-C (aHR, 95% CI: 1.44, 0.95-2.17) levels produced marginal effects without significance. Women with high LDL-C levels more often received a breast cancer diagnosis than those with medium levels (aHR, 95% CI: 1.56, 1.03-2.35).

CONCLUSION

This real-world dataset highlights the importance of balancing lipid profiles, particularly total cholesterol and HDL-C. Dysregulation of the lipid profile, not the glucose or blood pressure profiles, may increase the risk of breast cancer in women with T2DM.

Mildly elevated diastolic blood pressure increases subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women in the Health Examinees-Gem study

Epidemiological evidence suggests that hypertension is associated with breast cancer risk. However, previous studies disregard blood pressure components in the healthy population. We aimed to examine the relationship between systolic and diastolic blood pressure and breast cancer risk in a Korean population-based prospective cohort. A total of 73,031 women from the Health Examinees Gem Study were followed from baseline (2004 to 2013) through 2018. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured by trainee physicians at baseline recruitment and then categorized based on the international guidelines for clinical hypertension. Associations between systolic and diastolic blood pressure with overall breast cancer and stratified by premenopausal and postmenopausal status were evaluated using adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression. A total of 858 breast cancer cases were recorded for a median follow-up period of 9 years. Compared with the normal DBP category (< 85 mmHg), the normal-high category was positively associated with breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women (85–89 mmHg, HR 1.73 95% CI 1.28–2.33), but not in premenopausal women (85–89 mmHg, HR 0.87 95% CI 0.56–1.35). Similar results were found when all cases of self-reported hypertension were excluded. Results for SBP did not show a significant association with breast cancer risk. The association between DBP and breast cancer suggests DBP could be an important factor in cancer prevention, especially for women after menopause. Our study provides a first detailed approach to understanding the importance of diastolic blood pressure for breast cancer prevention and warrants further investigation.

Contribution of RAGE axis activation to the association between metabolic syndrome and cancer

Far beyond the compelling proofs supporting that the metabolic syndrome represents a risk factor for diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, a growing body of evidence suggests that it is also a risk factor for different types of cancer. However, the involved molecular mechanisms underlying this association are not fully understood, and they have been mainly focused on the individual contributions of each component of the metabolic syndrome such as obesity, hyperglycemia, and high blood pressure to the development of cancer. The Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-products (RAGE) axis activation has emerged as an important contributor to the pathophysiology of many clinical entities, by fueling a chronic inflammatory milieu, and thus supporting an optimal microenvironment to promote tumor growth and progression. In the present review, we intend to highlight that RAGE axis activation is a crosswise element on the potential mechanistic contributions of some relevant components of metabolic syndrome into the association with cancer.

Metabolic Syndrome: does this influence breast cancer outcomes in the triple-negative population?

INTRODUCTION

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is defined by having at least 3 of 4 components: obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension (HTN), and diabetes. Prior studies analyzed the individual components of MS for all breast cancers which are predominantly hormone positive. Our study is the first to evaluate MS in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of TNBC from 2007 to 2013 identified 177 patients with complete information for statistical analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to test the association between MS, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

48 (27%) patients had MS. After controlling for age, race, pathologic stage, surgery type, and additional comorbidities outside of MS, MS was significantly associated with poorer DFS (adjusted HR: 2.24, p = 0.030), but not associated with OS (adjusted HR: 1.92, p = 0.103). HTN was significantly associated with poorer DFS (adjusted HR: 3.63, p = 0.006) and OS (adjusted HR: 3.45, p = 0.035) in the univariable and multivariable analyses. Diabetes was not associated with worse OS or DFS. The 5-year age-adjusted OS rates for 60-year-old patients with and without diabetes were 85.8% and 87.3%, respectively. The age-adjusted 5-year OS rate for 60-year old patients was higher in patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 (90.2%) versus BMIs of 25-29.9 (88.2%) or < 25 (83.5%).

CONCLUSION

In the TNBC population, MS was significantly associated with poorer DFS, but not associated with OS. HTN was the only component of MS that was significantly associated with both DFS and OS. Obesity has a potential small protective benefit in the TNBC population.