1
|
Brito LC, Rice SPM, Bowles NP, Butler MP, McHill AW, Emens JS, Shea SA, Thosar SS. Identifying an acceptable number of ambulatory blood pressure measurements for accuracy of average blood pressure and nocturnal dipping status. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2024; 327:H399-H405. [PMID: 38874614 PMCID: PMC11442022 DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00220.2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
We aimed to identify the minimum number of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) measures to accurately determine daytime and nighttime systolic blood pressure (BP) averages and nocturnal dipping status (i.e., relative daytime:nighttime change). A total of 43 midlife participants wore an ABP monitor for 24 h with measurements every 20/30 min during the daytime/nighttime, as identified by a sleep diary. We calculated daytime/nighttime systolic BP average and dipping status from all available measurements per participant (i.e., normative data). We then calculated daytime and nighttime BP per participant based on a random selection of 8-20 and 4-10 measurements and replicated random selections 1,000 times. We calculated accuracy by checking the proportion from 1,000 different randomly selected samples for a particular number of measurements that systolic BP was ±5 mmHg of normative data, and dipping status remained unchanged for each participant compared with the normative value. The best fit for the regression model estimated the minimal number of measurements for an accuracy of 95% in BP averages. For a 95% accuracy in estimating daytime and nighttime systolic BP, 11 daytime and 8 nighttime measurements were required. The highest accuracy for dipping status was 91.6 ± 13.4% using 20 daytime and 10 nighttime measures, while the lowest was (83.4 ± 15.1%) using 8 daytime and 4 nighttime measures. In midlife adults, 11 daytime and 8 nighttime measurements are likely enough to calculate average systolic BPs accurately. However, no minimum number is suggested to accurately calculate dipping status.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We found that a minimum of 11 blood pressure (BP) measures are necessary to calculate an accurate average daytime BP, and 8 nighttime measures are necessary to calculate an accurate nighttime average if 95% accuracy is acceptable. Regarding BP dipping status, the current recommendations (20 daytime/7 nighttime) inaccurately classified the dipping status 10.5% of the time, suggesting that guidelines may need to be updated to classify patients as nocturnal dippers or nondippers correctly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leandro C Brito
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Sean P M Rice
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Nicole P Bowles
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Matthew P Butler
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
- Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Andrew W McHill
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Jonathan S Emens
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
- Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Steven A Shea
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Saurabh S Thosar
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brito LCD, Bowles NP, McHill AW, Rice SPM, Butler MP, Emens JS, Shea SA, Thosar SS. Chronological distribution of readings in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring exams affects the nighttime average and the magnitude of blood pressure dipping. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2023; 325:H1394-H1399. [PMID: 37861648 PMCID: PMC10908404 DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00542.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES Averaged nighttime blood pressure (BP) is superior to daytime BP for cardiovascular risk stratification, and the relative change between daytime/nighttime BP (dipping%) significantly predicts cardiovascular risk. Newer reports suggest that 4 measurements at night may be enough for cardiovascular risk stratification. Since BP oscillates across the night, the temporal distribution of measurements across the night may impact nighttime BP and dipping%. Therefore, we compared average nighttime BP and dipping% when using measurements in the first half (1st-half), second (2nd-half), and a combination of both (combined). METHODS Forty-three (17 females and twenty-six males) midlife adults aged 50±10 years old wore an ambulatory BP monitor for 24 hours at home, programmed to measure BP every 20 minutes when scheduled for daytime and every 30 minutes during a self-selected 8-hour nighttime for time-in-bed. We compared the nighttime BP averages and dipping% when using either the first four measurements from the 1st-half or 2nd-half of the nighttime and combined. RESULTS Nighttime Systolic BP was significantly different across 1st-half, 2nd-half, and combined (111±9 vs.107±11 vs. 109±9 mmHg, p<0.01), respectively, with significant pairwise differences across all categories (p<0.01 for each). Systolic BP dipping% was significantly different across 1st-half, 2nd-half, and combined (9.9±5.5 vs.13.5±6.4 vs. 11.7±5.0 %, p<0.01), respectively, with significant pairwise differences across all categories (p<0.01 for each. Diastolic BP and diastolic dipping% were similar across the three different bins. CONCLUSION In midlife adults, systolic nighttime BP and dipping% may depend upon when BP measurements are taken during the night.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leandro Campos de Brito
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | | | - Andrew W McHill
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Sean P M Rice
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, United States
| | - Matthew P Butler
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | | | - Steven A Shea
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Saurabh S Thosar
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University Hospital, Portland, Oregon, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee EK, Zhu MT, Chan DC, Yip BH, Mihailidou AS, Wong SY. Reply to ‘Night-time blood pressure definition and target organ damage: the dark side of the moon’. J Hypertens 2022; 40:2539-2540. [DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000003302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|