Contemporary trends in cardiac rehabilitation in Germany: patient characteristics, drug treatment, and risk-factor management from 2000 to 2005

Temporal Trends in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation and Its Core Components: A Nationwide Cohort Study From the Netherlands

PURPOSE

Patient- and disease-specific data on cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participation and changes over time are limited. The objective of this study was to describe time trends in CR participation between 2013 and 2019 and provides insights into the utilization of CR components.

METHODS

Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) with an indication for CR were enrolled between 2013 and 2019. Dutch health insurance claims data were used to identify CR participation and its components.

RESULTS

In total, 106 212 patients with CVD were included of which 37% participated in CR. Participation significantly increased from 28% in 2013 to 41% in 2016 but remained unchanged thereafter. Participation was highest in the youngest age groups (<50 yrs 52%; 50-65 yrs 50%), men (48%), patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (73%), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (59%), and coronary artery bypass grafting (82%). In contrast, it was the lowest in the oldest age group (≥85 yrs 8%), women (30%), and in patients with heart failure (11%). Most participants in CR received referral plus an admission session (97%) and exercise training (82%), whereas complementary services related to dietary (14%) and mental health counseling (10%) had a low utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

CR participation rates increased to 41% in 2016 but remained unchanged thereafter. Participation modulators included age, sex, CVD diagnosis, and undergoing a cardiothoracic procedure. Education and exercise sessions were frequently adopted, but dietary and mental health counseling had a low utilization rate. These findings suggest the need for reinvigorated referral and novel enrollment strategies in specific CVD subgroups to further promote CR participation and its associated underutilized adjunctive services.

Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

Objective

The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize the literature on barriers and facilitators that influence the provision and uptake of inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (ICR).

Methods

A literature search was conducted using PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and AgeLine. Studies were included if they were published in English after the year 2000 and focused on adults who were receiving some form of ICR (eg, exercise counselling and training, education for heart-healthy living). For studies meeting inclusion criteria, descriptive data on authors, year, study design, and intervention type were extracted.

Results

The literature search resulted in a total of 44,331 publications, of which 229 studies met inclusion criteria. ICR programs vary drastically and often focus on promoting physical exercises and patient education. Barriers and facilitators were categorized through patient, provider and system level factors. Individual characteristics and provider knowledge and efficacy were categorized as both barriers and facilitators to ICR delivery and uptake. Team functioning, lack of resources, program coordination, and inconsistencies in evaluation acted as key barriers to ICR delivery and uptake. Key facilitators that influence ICR implementation and engagement include accreditation and professional associations and patient and family-centred practices.

Conclusion

ICR programs can be highly effective at improving health outcomes for those living with CVDs. Our review identified several patient, provider, and system-level considerations that act as barriers and facilitators to ICR delivery and uptake. Future research should explore how to encourage health promotion knowledge amongst ICR staff and patients.

Management and outcomes of patients with reduced ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction in cardiac rehabilitation centers

BACKGROUND

We aimed to describe the contemporary management of patients with systolic chronic heart failure (CHF) during a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) stay and present outcomes with focus on lipids, blood pressure, exercise capacity, and clinical events.

METHODS

Comparison of 3199 patients with moderately or severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (low EF, 13.3%) and 20,913 patients with slightly reduced or normal LVEF (normal EF, 86.7%) who underwent an inpatient CR period of about 3 weeks in 2009-2010.

RESULTS

Patients with low EF compared to those with normal EF were somewhat older (65.1 vs. 63.0 years, p < 0.0001), and more often had risk factors such as diabetes mellitus (39.7% vs. 32.0%, p < 0.0001) or other comorbidities. The overall rate of patients with regular physical activity of at least 90 minutes per week prior to CR was low overall (54.4%), and reduced in patients with low EF compared to those with normal EF (47.7% vs. 55.5%, p < 0.0001). The rate of patients that achieved lower LDL cholesterol (<100 mg/dl), total cholesterol (<200 mg/dl) and triglyceride (<150 mg/dl) values at discharge increased compared to baseline. Mean blood pressure was substantially lower in the low EF group compared to the normal EF group both at baseline (124/75 vs. 130/78 mmHg, p < 0.0001) and at discharge (119/72 vs. 124/74 mmHg, p < 0.0001). Maximum exercise improved substantially in both groups (at baseline 71 vs. 91 Watts, p < 0.0001; at discharge 85 vs. 105 Watts, p < 0.0001). Event rates during CR were low, and only 0.3% in the low EF group died. As limitations to this study, information on brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) and/or cardiac troponin were not documented, and no long-term information was collected beyond the 3-week CR stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CHF account for a considerable proportion of patients in CR. Also patients with moderate/severe EF benefited from participation in CR, as their lipid profile and physical fitness improved.

Management of patients with ST-segment elevation or non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes in cardiac rehabilitation centers

BACKGROUND

Current data on the management of patients in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after an acute hospital stay due to ST-segment elevation or non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (STE-ACS or NSTE-ACS) are limited. We aimed to describe patient characteristics, risk factor management, and lipid target achievement of patients in CR in Germany and compare the 2 groups.

HYPOTHESIS

With respect to the risk factor pattern and treatment effects during a CR stay, there are important differences between STE-ACS and NSTE-ACS patients.

METHODS

Comparison of 7950 patients by STE-ACS or NSTE-ACS status in the Transparency Registry to Objectify Guideline-Oriented Risk Factor Management registry (2010) who underwent an inpatient CR period of about 3 weeks.

RESULTS

STE-ACS patients compared to NSTE-ACS patients were significantly younger (60.5 vs 64.4 years, P < 0.0001), and had diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or any risk factor (exception: smoking) less often. At discharge, in STE-ACS compared to NSTE-ACS patients, the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 mg/dL goal was achieved by 75.3% and 76.2%, respectively (LDL-C <70 mg/dL by 27.7% and 27.4%), the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal of >50 mg/dL in women and >40 mg/dL in men was achieved by 49.3% and 49.0%, respectively, and the triglycerides goal of <150 mg/dl was achieved by 72.3% and 74.3%, respectively (all comparisons not significant). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 121/74 and 123/74 mm Hg, respectively (P < 0.0001 systolic, diastolic not significant). The maximum exercise capacity was 110 and 102 W, respectively (P < 0.0001), and the maximum walking distance was 581 and 451 meters, respectively (P value not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with STE-ACS and NSTE-ACS differed moderately in their baseline characteristics. Both groups benefited from the participation in CR, as their lipid profile, blood pressure, and physical fitness improved.

Cardiovascular risk factor management of myocardial infarction patients with and without diabetes in the Netherlands between 2002 and 2006: a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data

OBJECTIVE

We examined levels and trends in cardiovascular risk factors and drug treatment in myocardial infarction (MI) patients with and without diabetes.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of baseline Alpha Omega Trial data, a randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

32 hospitals in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, we had 1014 MI patients with diabetes (74% men) and 3823 without diabetes (79% men) aged 60-80 years, analysed over the period 2002-2006.

RESULTS

Between 2002 and 2006, a significantly decreasing trend in the prevalence of obesity (-5%, p(trend)=0.02) and in systolic blood pressure (BP) levels (-5 mm Hg, p(trend)<0.0001) was demonstrated in non-diabetic patients, but not in diabetic patients. In 2006, obesity, mean systolic BP and serum triglyceride levels were significantly higher, whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were lower in diabetic patients compared to those without. Prescription of antihypertensive drug (diabetic vs non-diabetic patients respectively, 95% vs 93%, p=0.08) and statin treatment were high (86% and 90%, p=0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of MI patients with and without diabetes was similarly treated with cardiovascular drugs. In spite of high drug treatment levels, more adverse risk factors were found in patients with diabetes.

Treatment patterns and risk factor control in patients with and without metabolic syndrome in cardiac rehabilitation

Aim

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a clustering of factors that are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. We aimed to investigate the proportion of patients with MetS in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (CR), and to describe differences between patients with MetS compared to those without MetS with regard to (1) patient characteristics including demographics, risk factors, and comorbidities, (2) risk factor management including drug treatment, and (3) control status of risk factors at entry to CR and discharge from CR.

Methods

Post-hoc analysis of data from 27,904 inpatients (Transparency Registry to Objectify Guideline-Oriented Risk Factor Management registry) that underwent a CR period of about 3 weeks were analyzed descriptively in total and compared by their MetS status.

Results

In the total cohort, mean age was 64.3 years, (71.7% male), with no major differences between groups. Patients had been referred after a ST elevation of myocardial infarction event in 41.1% of cases, non-ST elevation of myocardial infarction in 21.8%, or angina pectoris in 16.7%. They had received a percutaneous coronary intervention in 55.1% and bypass surgery (coronary artery bypass graft) in 39.5%. Patients with MetS (n = 15,819) compared to those without MetS (n = 12,085) were less frequently males, and in terms of cardiac interventions, more often received coronary artery bypass surgery. Overall, statin use increased from 79.9% at entry to 95.0% at discharge (MetS: 79.7% to 95.2%). Patients with MetS compared to those without MetS received angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, oral antidiabetics, and insulin at entry and discharge more frequently, and less frequently clopidogrel and aspirin/clopidogrel combinations. Mean blood pressure was within the normal range at discharge, and did not differ substantially between groups (124/73 versus 120/72 mmHg). Overall, between entry and discharge, levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides were substantially lowered, in particular in MetS patients. Thus, control rates of lipid parameters improved substantially, with the exception of high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol rates <100 mg/dL increased from 38.7% at entry to 73.8% at discharge (MetS: from 39.4% to 74.6%) and triglycerides control rates (<150 mg/dL) from 58.1% to 70.4% (MetS: 43.7% to 62.2%). Physical fitness on exercise testing improved substantially in both groups.

Conclusion

Patients with and without MetS benefited substantially from the participation in CR, as their lipid profile, blood pressure, and physical fitness improved. Treatment effects were similar in the two groups.

Current state of cardiac rehabilitation in Germany: patient characteristics, risk factor management and control status, by education level

Background

After the acute hospital stay, most cardiac patients in Germany are transferred for a 3–4-week period of inpatient cardiac rehabilitation. We aim to describe patient characteristics and risk factor management of cardiac rehabilitation patients with a focus on drug treatment and control status, differentiated by education level (low level, elementary school; intermediate level, secondary modern school; high level, grammar school/university).

Methods

Data covering a time period between 2003 and 2008 from 68,191 hospitalized patients in cardiac rehabilitation from a large-scale registry (Transparency Registry to Objectify Guideline- Oriented Risk Factor Management) were analyzed descriptively. Further, a multivariate model was applied to assess factors associated with good control of risk factors.

Results

In the total cohort, patients with a manifestation of coronary artery disease (mean age 63.7 years, males 71.7%) were referred to cardiac rehabilitation after having received percutaneous coronary intervention (51.6%) or coronary bypass surgery (39.5%). Statin therapy increased from 76.3% at entry to 88.9% at discharge, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol < 100 mg/dL rates increased from 31.1% to 69.6%. Mean fasting blood glucose decreased from 108 mg/dL to 104 mg/dL, and mean exercise capacity increased from 78 W to 95 W. Age and gender did not differ by education. In contrast with patients having high education, those with low education had more diabetes, hypertension, and peripheral arterial disease, had lower exercise capacity, and received less treatment with statins and guideline-orientated therapy in general. In the multivariate model, good control was significantly more likely in men (odds ratio 1.38; 95% confidence interval 1.30–1.46), less likely in patients of higher age (0.99; 0.99–0.99), with diabetes (0.90; 0.85–0.95), or peripheral arterial disease (0.88; 0.82–0.95). Compared with a low level education, a mid level education was associated with poor control (0.94; 0.89–0.99), while high education did not have a significant effect (1.08; 0.99–1.17).

Conclusion

Patients with different levels of education treated in cardiac rehabilitation did not differ relevantly in terms of demographics, but did differ in some clinical aspects. With respect to the ultimate goal of cardiac rehabilitation, ie, optimal control of risk factors, education level does not play an important role.

Medium-term effects of cardiac rehabilitation in Germany: systematic review and meta-analysis of results from national and international trials

BACKGROUND

Contrary to international practice, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in Germany is predominantly offered as comprehensive inpatient treatment lasting for 3 weeks. Evidence for this kind of health care is poor, comprising observational cohort studies only.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search for relevant German studies (1990-2004). International studies were selected from recent meta-analyses. Medium-term (12 month) results for blood lipids, blood pressure, functional capacity and psychological wellbeing, as well as cardiac morbidity and mortality are reported.

RESULTS

For most outcomes, effect sizes in national studies are poorer than those from international interventions or, in the case of blood pressure and depression, even poorer than international controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether, our analysis does not suggest that comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation treatment is superior to international practice of long-term outpatient rehabilitation.

Prevalence and overlap of different lipid abnormalities in statin-treated patients at high cardiovascular risk in clinical practice in Germany

Background

In line with current guideline recommendations, patients at high cardiovascular risk are usually treated with statins for secondary as well as for primary prevention. While many studies investigated treatment goal achievement with regards to low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and total cholesterol (TC) there is paucity of data regarding high density lipoprotein (HDL-C), and/or triglycerides (TG).

Setting

Prospective, cross-sectional study (Dyslipidemia International Survey, DYSIS) with data provided by 748 office-based physicians throughout Germany.

Methods

Consecutive patients were eligible for participation, if they were at least 45 years old, currently treated with a statin and had had a documented lipid profile (at least 1 parameter) within the last 6 months. Besides descriptive analyses, logistic regression was performed with backward selection to assess predictors for lipid abnormalities (non-attainment of goals for TC, LDL-C, low HDL-C or elevated TG) classified according to current European Society of Cardiology guidelines.

Results

The 4,282 documented patients (98.6% Caucasian, 56.4% male; 86.6% at high cardiovascular risk) were predominantly treated with simvastatin (83.9%), pravastatin (7.7%) or atorvastatin (3.9%), usually with doses equivalent to simvastatin 20–40 mg daily. Non-statins were used in at most 12% of patients. No lipid abnormalities were found in 21.0% of patients, one abnormality in 38.5%, two in 31.9%, and all three in 8.5%. LDL-C goals were not attained in 58.1%, elevated TC was found in 66.6%, low HDL-C in 22.7%, and elevated TG in 47.3%. In the multivariate logistic regression model, non-attainment of LDL-C levels was predicted by hypertension (odds ratio, OR 1.4), current smoking (OR 1.3), sedentary lifestyle (OR 1.3), and female gender (OR 1.3). On the other hand, a reduced risk for missing LDL-C targets was noted in the presence of ischemic heart disease (OR 0.6), diabetes (0.5), higher statin doses, ezetimibe treatment, or specialist care, respectively.

Conclusion

A substantial proportion of statin-treated patients not only missed targets for LDL-C, but also did not attain the normal levels for HDL-C and/or TG. There is a large disconnect between high prevalence of HDL and/or TG disorders, with or without elevated LDL-C, and utilization of therapies targeting these lipids. Particularly in high-risk patients, additional efforts should be made to improve their lipid profile.

Secondary prevention of diabetic patients with coronary artery disease in cardiac rehabilitation: risk factors, treatment and target level attainment

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic patients who have suffered from an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or have had coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery are at very high risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Their prognosis, however, can be improved if the target values for blood pressure (BP < 130/80 mmHg) or low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dl), optionally < 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dl)] are achieved. It is not known what proportion of diabetic patients receives such stringent secondary prevention measures and achieves target level attainment for BP, lipids and glucose in cardiac rehabilitation (CR).

METHODS

During 2003 to 2005, 11 973 diabetic (29.7%) and 28 370 non-diabetic patients (70.3%), predominantly after ACS (74 and 80%), were included in a nationwide registry. At entry and at discharge, patient characteristics, pharmacotherapy and blood pressure, lipids and blood glucose were recorded. In a mixed model approach, temporal changes between centres and within centres, respectively, were analysed.

RESULTS

At discharge, a lower proportion of diabetic patients achieved normalisation of BP (in 2005: <140/90 mmHg: 78.4 vs. 82.9% in non-diabetic patients, p < 0.001) or <130/80 mmHg (45.5 vs. 49.8%), respectively. LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L was more frequently attained in diabetic patients (68.2 vs. 66.5%), as was LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L (28.8 vs. 23.0%). Fasting blood glucose was not changed during the observation period, as at discharge almost a quarter of all diabetic patients exceeded the threshold value of 7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dl). In 2005 at discharge, statin therapy was administered in 93% in both diabetics and non-diabetics, acetylic salicylic acid in 79% in diabetics vs. 80% in non-diabetic patients (clopidogrel: 41 vs. 45%).

CONCLUSION

Generally there is room for improvement in the management of cardiac risk factors for both patients groups. In diabetic patients in CR at high risk for recurrent cardiac events, in recent years an improvement of the lipid profile has been observed. Hypertension and glycaemia are still not optimally addressed.