NATURAL COURSE OF PATIENTS DISCONTINUING TREATMENT FOR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION AND FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH VISUAL PROGNOSIS

Progression of Geographic Atrophy: Retrospective Analysis of Patients from the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight)

Purpose

To evaluate disease progression and associated vision changes in patients with geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in 1 eye and GA or neovascular AMD (nAMD) in the fellow eye using a large dataset from routine clinical practice.

Design

Retrospective analysis of clinical data over 24 months.

Subjects

A total of 256 635 patients with GA from the American Academy of Ophthalmology (Academy) IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry (January 2016 to December 2017).

Methods

Patients with ≥ 24 months of follow-up were grouped by fellow-eye status: Cohort 1, GA:GA; Cohort 2, GA:nAMD, each with (subfoveal) and without subfoveal (nonsubfoveal) involvement. Eyes with history of retinal disease other than AMD were excluded. Sensitivity analysis included patients who were managed by retina specialists and had a record of imaging within 30 days of diagnosis.

Main Outcome Measures

Change in visual acuity (VA), occurrence of new-onset nAMD, and GA progression from nonsubfoveal to subfoveal.

Results

In total, 69 441 patients were included: 44 120 (64%) GA:GA and 25 321 (36%) GA:nAMD. Otherwise eligible patients (57 788) were excluded due to follow-up < 24 months. In both GA:GA and GA:nAMD cohorts, nonsubfoveal study eyes had better mean (standard deviation) VA at index (67 [19.3] and 66 [20.3] letters) than subfoveal eyes (59 [23.9] and 47 [26.9] letters), and 24-month mean VA changes were similar for nonsubfoveal (-7.6 and -6.2) and subfoveal (-7.9 and -6.5) subgroups. Progression to subfoveal GA occurred in 16.7% of nonsubfoveal study eyes in the GA:GA cohort and 12.5% in the GA:nAMD cohort. More new-onset study-eye nAMD was observed in the GA:nAMD (21.6%) versus GA:GA (8.2%) cohorts. Sensitivity analysis supported the robustness of the observations in the study.

Conclusions

This retrospective analysis describes the natural progression of GA lesions and the decline in VA associated with the disease.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Surgical Care in Specialist Ophthalmology Departments: Structure and Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

Specialist ophthalmology departments contribute to the surgical care of German patients. Outpatient and inpatient surgeries were restricted during the COVID-19 pandemic and led to a sharp decline in the number of cases in ophthalmological care. The aim of this analysis was to improve the understanding of the logistic structures of medical facilities as well as the effects of the pandemic.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Based on reported process data, a sample of the specialist ophthalmological departments were examined based on operation and procedure codes (OPS) and data submitted between 01.01.2017 and 31.05.2021 according to the benchmarking programmes of the Professional Association of German Anaesthetists (BDA), the Professional Association of German Surgeons (BDC), and the Association for Operating Theatre Management (VOPM).

RESULTS

Eighteen ophthalmology departments from Germany were analysed. After the decline in the number of cases (by temporarily up to 48%) during the first wave of the pandemic, the case numbers of all interventions assessed as nonurgent continued to be reduced. While intravitreal injections hardly decreased during the first wave (- 16%), significant drops in the coverage of cataract surgery (- 79%), vitrectomies (- 35%), glaucoma surgery (- 59%), strabismus surgery (- 95%), and eyelid surgery (- 52%) were found. One exception was intravitreal injection, which stabilised at a lower level early on during the pandemic. Overall, the number of cases during the later phases of the pandemic were significantly reduced below the level of previous years, despite the maintenance of emergency care. The underuse was variable for different interventions.

CONCLUSION

In addition to self-reported figures, the analysed process data demonstrates the effect that various factors had on elective as well as urgent operations within hospital care during the pandemic. Despite partial stabilisation of some services, a relevant supply gap for outpatient and inpatient interventions was identified, with corresponding effects on the eye health of the population, while compensation or performance enhancement have not taken place to date. Facing the growing preload and the demographic development, future structures must therefore allow for an increase in the performance of specialist ophthalmological departments.

Save our Sight (SOS): a collective call-to-action for enhanced retinal care across health systems in high income countries

With a growing aging population, the prevalence of age-related eye disease and associated eye care is expected to increase. The anticipated growth in demand, coupled with recent medical advances that have transformed eye care for people living with retinal diseases, particularly neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic eye disease, has presented an opportunity for health systems to proactively manage the expected burden of these diseases. To do so, we must take collective action to address existing and anticipated capacity limitations by designing and implementing sustainable strategies that enable health systems to provide an optimal standard of care. Sufficient capacity will enable us to streamline and personalize the patient experience, reduce treatment burden, enable more equitable access to care and ensure optimal health outcomes. Through a multi-modal approach that gathered unbiased perspectives from clinical experts and patient advocates from eight high-income countries, substantiated perspectives with evidence from the published literature and validated findings with the broader eye care community, we have exposed capacity challenges that are motivating the community to take action and advocate for change. Herein, we propose a collective call-to-action for the future management of retinal diseases and potential strategies to achieve better health outcomes for individuals at-risk of, or living with, retinal disease.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Quality of Care of Treatment-Naïve Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Receiving Intravitreal Aflibercept

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the quality of care received by treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who received intravitreal aflibercept therapy before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with patients who received the same therapy during the pandemic.

METHODS

Data, including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and anatomical outcomes at diagnosis and at each follow-up, was collected on 297 treatment-naïve patients who received intravitreal aflibercept. Therapy-naïve patients who started therapy at least 24 months prior to the first pandemic-related lockdown and were thus treated exclusively prior to the pandemic (n = 123) were compared with patients who started therapy within 12 months prior to the first lockdown and were thus treated during the pandemic (n = 174). Both groups were followed over a two-year period.

RESULTS

In patients treated before the COVID-19 pandemic, VA remained stable (0.58 ± 0.41 logMAR) compared to baseline (0.54 ± 0.34 logMAR; p = 0.228) until the end of the observation period. In patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic, BCVA dropped below the baseline (0.56 ± 0.35 logMAR) within 24-month of follow-up (0.79 ± 0.43 logMAR; p = 0.010). Compared to the patients treated prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the latter group showed a significantly worse VA at the 6-month (p = 0.041), 12-month (p = 0.040), 18-month (p = 0.024), 21-month (p = 0.035), and 24-month (p = 0.004) follow-up. Additionally, the group treated during the COVID-19 pandemic received significantly fewer aflibercept injections (3,94 ± 1,9 vs. 3,30 ± 1,6; p = 0,007) and fewer follow-up examinations (2,71 ± 1,2 vs. 2,16 ± 0,9; p < 0,001) in the second year compared to the group that was treated before the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed significantly worse VA outcomes in the group of nAMD patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Impeded access to care could be attributed to the restrictions imposed owing to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Home vision monitoring in patients with maculopathy: current and future options for digital technologies

Patients with macular pathology, including that caused by age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema, must attend frequent in-clinic monitoring appointments to detect onset of disease activity requiring treatment and to monitor progression of existing disease. In-person clinical monitoring places a significant burden on patients, caregivers and healthcare systems and is limited in that it only provides clinicians with a snapshot of the patient's disease status. The advent of remote monitoring technologies offers the potential for patients to test their own retinal health at home in collaboration with clinicians, reducing the need for in-clinic appointments. In this review we discuss visual function tests, both existing and novel, that have the potential for remote use and consider their suitability for discriminating the presence of disease and progression of disease. We then review the clinical evidence supporting the use of mobile applications for monitoring of visual function from clinical development through to validation studies and real-world implementation. This review identified seven app-based visual function tests: four that have already received some form of regulatory clearance and three under development. The evidence included in this review shows that remote monitoring offers great potential for patients with macular pathology to monitor their condition from home, reducing the need for burdensome clinic visits and expanding clinicians' understanding of patients' retinal health beyond traditional clinical monitoring. In order to instil confidence in the use of remote monitoring in both patients and clinicians further longitudinal real-world studies are now warranted.

Clinical outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a cohort study of patients with care delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to both intentional and unintentional care delay among age-related neovascular macular degeneration (nvAMD) patients. Prior studies have demonstrated that patients who discontinue nvAMD treatment for prolonged intervals are at high risk for vision loss, but less is known regarding shorter-term delay, such as during the height of the pandemic. Previous studies have looked at COVID-19 related delay in care and have shown a loss of visual acuity (VA) among these patients, but studies are limited by short follow-up or insufficient comparisons. This was an observational cohort study of nvAMD patients from March 1, 2019, through July 1, 2021, who experienced care delay. VA was modeled using a linear longitudinal mixed-effects model comparing historic data pre-lockdown to data post-lockdown. Covariates included baseline anatomic variables, demographic variables, and time intervals (treatment interval, delay interval). Secondary anatomic and treatment outcomes were modeled using a multilevel binary logistic regression model. 163 eyes among 116 patients were included. Initial longitudinal mixed-effects models found that although overall VA decreased at a yearly rate, when comparing pre-lockdown and post-lockdown time periods, VA slopes were not statistically different. Single-covariate longitudinal models showed that age, sex, and delay interval significantly affected VA slope. The multivariate longitudinal model found that a longer delay interval significantly decreased rate of VA loss. Multilevel binary logistic regression models showed a significant increase in odds of anti-VEGF treatment, presence of subretinal fluid, and macular hemorrhages in the post-lockdown period. Overall, when compared to historic data, rate of VA loss among our cohort did not vary significantly in pre-versus post-lockdown time periods, although treatment and anatomic variables did worsen post-lockdown suggesting that patients may be appropriately delayed but this comes at the risk of increased need for treatment.

Optical coherence tomography imaging biomarkers associated with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review

The aim of this systematic literature review is twofold, (1) detail the impact of retinal biomarkers identifiable via optical coherence tomography (OCT) on disease progression and response to treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and (2) establish which biomarkers are currently identifiable by artificial intelligence (AI) models and the utilisation of this technology. Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed was searched for peer-reviewed publications dated between January 2016 and January 2022.

POPULATION

Patients diagnosed with nAMD with OCT imaging.

SETTINGS

Comparable settings to NHS hospitals.

STUDY DESIGNS

Randomised controlled trials, prospective/retrospective cohort studies and review articles. From 228 articles, 130 were full-text reviewed, 50 were removed for falling outside the scope of this review with 10 added from the author's inventory, resulting in the inclusion of 90 articles. From 9 biomarkers identified; intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid, pigment epithelial detachment, subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM), retinal pigmental epithelial (RPE) atrophy, drusen, outer retinal tabulation (ORT), hyperreflective foci (HF) and retinal thickness, 5 are considered pertinent to nAMD disease progression; IRF, SHRM, drusen, ORT and HF. A number of these biomarkers can be classified using current AI models. Significant retinal biomarkers pertinent to disease activity and progression in nAMD are identifiable via OCT; IRF being the most important in terms of the significant impact on visual outcome. Incorporating AI into ophthalmology practice is a promising advancement towards automated and reproducible analyses of OCT data with the ability to diagnose disease and predict future disease conversion.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This review has been registered with PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD42021233200).

Prevalence and Visual Consequences of Non-adherent Patients Receiving Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Injections at King Fahad Specialist Hospital (KFSH), Qassim Region

BACKGROUND

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection treatment is a widely utilized therapy for various retinal diseases, including diabetic macular edema (DME). Therefore, the importance of compliance and follow-up should be discussed with the patient. There have been no studies conducted in the Qassim region to estimate the prevalence of patients missing their anti-VEGF appointments. To fulfill this need, we conducted this study to evaluate the compliance rate of patients treated with anti-VEGF injections for DME as well as to determine the visual consequences of the delay in anti-VEGF treatment in the Qassim region.

METHODOLOGY

This observational retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Fahad Specialist Hospital (KFSH) in the Qassim region of Saudi Arabia. We extracted all file numbers of patients who were using intravitreal anti-VEGF injections to treat DME. The data were managed and analyzed using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

In the current study, we were able to collect data from 198 patients who received anti-VEGF treatment in the hospital. Among the participants, 57.6% were male, with a mean age of 61.7 years old (standard deviation (SD) = 10.23). Among the patients, we found that the rate of non-adherence to the anti-VEGF injection was 54.5%, and those patients delayed their scheduled doses for more than 56 days. In 47.5% of the patients, delaying or stopping their appointments had no known reason; however, blepharitis was the main reason for delaying or stopping the dose in 27.7% of the patients, followed by endophthalmitis in 18.7% of the patients. There is no significant difference between before and after stopping the treatment, considering visual acuity (VA) or optical coherence tomography (OCT). However, regarding the disease progression, we found that 15 out of the 30 patients had worsened in the OCT after they missed their injections (mean increase in the VA was 6.069 (SD = 97.45), t = -0.278, P = 0.783, and decrease in the OCT was -14.9667 (SD = 133.87, P = 0.454).

CONCLUSION

There is a high rate of patients who missed their appointments for an anti-VEGF injection. This resulted in the worsening of OCT in half of the 30 patients who were enrolled in the visual consequences study, which had a negative impact on treatment and disease progression.

Functional Outcomes of Brolucizumab-Induced Intraocular Inflammation Involving the Posterior Segment-A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Early poor outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI) after intravitreal brolucizumab (IVB) have negatively affected the use of brolucizumab in clinical routine. We wished to identify factors related to the treatment details of IOI involving the posterior segment resulting from IVB for neovascular AMD (nAMD), if these were reported in detail. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials, and CENTRAL using the following search terms: <Brolucizumab> AND <AMD> AND <intraocular inflammation>. The risk of bias was rated using the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool. We included 31 reports (41 patients and 46 eyes). Patients were 75.9 ± 8.5 years, and 58.5% were female. IOI occurred 41.7 ± 37.5 (median 37.0) days after treatment initiation with 2.0 ± 1.3 (1-6) IVB injections. A mean change in visual acuity of -14.6 ± 21.0 (median -6.5) letters was reported. The mean time from first IOI signs to the initiation of any anti-inflammatory treatment was 3.3 ± 6.2 days, with 63% of the patients receiving systemic corticosteroids as standard treatment. Finally, a period effect was observed, with a change in visual acuity of -25.3 ± 27.1 and -2.6 ± 7.3 letters in the chronologically first and last third, respectively, of treated eyes (effect size: r = 0.71; p = 0.006). Functional outcomes markedly improved with increasing experience in managing IOI.

Discontinuation of treatment and retreatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the real-world: Bundang AMD cohort study report 5

Introduction

This single-center retrospective cohort study investigated the incidence rate and risk factors for the discontinuation of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and retreatment in typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration (tnAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) in the real-world setting.

Methods

A total of 488 eyes with either tnAMD (n = 334) or PCV (n = 154) followed up for ≥3 years were analyzed. The discontinuation of treatment was defined as the cessation of anti-VEGF injections for 1 year or longer. Eyes with discontinuing treatment were subdivided into group A: eyes with stable responses (complete or incomplete resolution) and group B: those with no expectation of visual gain or poor response. The proportion and median time of discontinuation of treatment or retreatment were analyzed. The visual prognosis and the associated risk factors for the discontinuation of treatment or retreatment were also investigated.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 8.1 ± 3.4 years. Of 488 eyes, discontinuation of the treatment occurred in 322 eyes (66.0%), and the median time to discontinuation was 1.5 years after the initial injection. Of 297 eyes with discontinuation of treatment excluding 25 eyes with vitrectomy or photodynamic therapy after the discontinuation of the injection, 277 eyes belonged to group A and the remaining 20 eyes belonged to group B. Of the 277 eyes discontinuing treatment with a stable response, 185 eyes (66.8%) were given retreatment. The median time to retreatment was 3.3 years after the discontinuation of the injections. PCV and the lower annual number of injections were the significant factors associated with discontinuation. Younger age, male gender, and PCV were the significant factors for the retreatment.

Conclusion

Our long-term real-world study showed that two-thirds of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) had the discontinuation of the anti-VEGF injections and two-thirds of eyes discontinuing treatment with stable responses experienced retreatment. Long-term follow-up and regular monitoring are needed to detect the recurrence.

Predicting the immediate impact of national lockdown on neovascular age-related macular degeneration and associated visual morbidity: an INSIGHT Health Data Research Hub for Eye Health report

OBJECTIVE

Predicting the impact of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) service disruption on visual outcomes following national lockdown in the UK to contain SARS-CoV-2.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This retrospective cohort study includes deidentified data from 2229 UK patients from the INSIGHT Health Data Research digital hub. We forecasted the number of treatment-naïve nAMD patients requiring anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) initiation during UK lockdown (16 March 2020 through 31 July 2020) at Moorfields Eye Hospital (MEH) and University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB). Best-measured visual acuity (VA) changes without anti-VEGF therapy were predicted using post hoc analysis of Minimally Classic/Occult Trial of the Anti-VEGF Antibody Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Neovascular AMD trial sham-control arm data (n=238).

RESULTS

At our centres, 376 patients were predicted to require anti-VEGF initiation during lockdown (MEH: 325; UHB: 51). Without treatment, mean VA was projected to decline after 12 months. The proportion of eyes in the MEH cohort predicted to maintain the key positive visual outcome of ≥70 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent 6/12) fell from 25.5% at baseline to 5.8% at 12 months (UHB: 9.8%-7.8%). Similarly, eyes with VA <25 ETDRS letters (6/96) were predicted to increase from 4.3% to 14.2% at MEH (UHB: 5.9%-7.8%) after 12 months without treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we demonstrate how combining data from a recently founded national digital health data repository with historical industry-funded clinical trial data can enhance predictive modelling in nAMD. The demonstrated detrimental effects of prolonged treatment delay should incentivise healthcare providers to support nAMD patients accessing care in safe environments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00056836.

Development of subretinal hemorrhage after treatment discontinuation for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence, risk factors, and their influence on visual outcomes of subretinal hemorrhage (SRH) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy(PCV) who discontinue treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 148 patients with nAMD and PCV who discontinued treatment. The development of a 3-disc area or greater extent of SRH after treatment discontinuation was identified. Visual acuity at the final visit was compared between patients with and those without SRH. Factors associated with SRH were then analyzed.

RESULTS

During the mean 56.8 ± 18.2 months of follow-up, treatment was discontinued at a mean 24.1 ± 16.3 months after diagnosis. SRH developed in 24 (16.2%) patients at a mean 21.5 ± 17.6 months after treatment discontinuation. The visual acuity at the final follow-up was significantly worse in patients with SRH than in those without SRH (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the incidence of SRH among the different types of macular neovascularization (MNV) (P = 0.024). In particular, the incidence of type 3 MNV was relatively high (36.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The development of SRH may lead to very poor visual prognosis in patients who discontinue treatment. The high risk of SRH in type 3 MNV suggests the need for caution when choosing treatment discontinuation in cases of type 3 MNV.

The negative impact of COVID-19 pandemic on age-related macular degeneration patients treated with intravitreal bevacizumab injections

Purpose

COVID-19 emerged in the end of 2019 and was declared a worldwide pandemic shortly after. Social distancing and lockdowns resulted in lower compliance in intravitreal injections and office visits. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes among patients who missed these visits compared to those who arrived as planned.

Methods

Patients who missed or were late to office visits or intravitreal injections were defined as non-adherent and were compared to adherent patients. Our main outcomes were the need for subsequent injections, mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central macular thickness (CMT).

Results

This study included 77 patients (24 adherent and 53 non-adherent). The mean BCVA remained stable during the study period for the adherent group (p = 0.159) and worsened in the non-adherent group (p < 0.001). Changes in CMT and maximum thickness were not significant for either group. A higher proportion of patients in the non-adherent group needed subsequent intravitreal injections (49% vs 20%, p = 0.014).

Conclusion

The findings demonstrate the negative implications of the COVID-19 pandemic and the effect of deferring bevacizumab injections among individuals with age-related macular degeneration. This emphasizes the importance of a scheduled follow-up, also during a pandemic.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-022-02337-y.

Delayed follow-up in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated under universal health coverage: risk factors and visual outcomes

PURPOSE

To report the rate of delayed follow-up visits (DFU), to identify risk factors of DFU and to assess the impact of DFU on outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included all nAMD patients (n=1291) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections between January 2013 and December 2020 in two centers in Quebec, Canada. A DFU was defined as a delay of ≥4 weeks than scheduled. Visual outcomes, especially ≥15 letters loss, were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 351 patients (27.2%) experienced ≥1 DFU. Odds were greater among older patients (P=0.005), patients treated at the hospital rather than the clinic (P<0.001), and patients with worse initial visual acuity (VA) (P=0.024). A DFU was associated with a mean VA loss of 4.2±13.4 letters (P<0.001), and an increased incidence of intraretinal (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) (P=0.001, P=0.005) at six months despite resumption of injections. Central foveal thickness (CFT) increased after DFU but returned to pre-DFU visit at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The DFU rate in nAMD patients treated under a universal healthcare system was around 27%. DFU caused significant decreases in VA and increases in IRF and SRF on OCT that did not recover following injections resumption despite normalization of CFT.

The Influence of COVID-19 on the Stability of Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Different Treatment Regimens

Introduction

To explore the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the stability of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) receiving the treat and extend (T&E) or the pro re nata (PRN) treatment regimen and to identify indicators that may predict the disease stability of nAMD.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of patients with nAMD treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University whose treatment schedule was interrupted at least once between 1 February and 31 May 2020. The demographic and clinical characteristics, including the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) features, subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), interval between the last injection and the beginning of the pandemic, and the number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections, were analyzed.

Results

A total of 209 stable patients with nAMD (122 eyes received the T&E regimen; 87 eyes received the PRN regimen) were identified. Compared to those who received the PRN regimen, the patients who received the T&E regimen were more stable during the first visit after COVID-19 (53.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.004), the BCVA was significantly better (58.5 letters vs. 56 letters, P = 0.006), and the CRT fluctuated only slightly (15 μm vs. 35 μm, P = 0.001). Furthermore, a multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that stable patients with nAMD with type 1 choroidal neovascularization (CNV) (OR 2.493 [95% CI 1.179–5.272], compared with type 2 CNV; P = 0.017; OR 2.912 [95% CI 1.133–7.485], compared with retinal angiomatous proliferation; P = 0.026) or with pigment epithelial detachment (PED) were more likely to remain stable when treatment was interrupted (OR 0.392 [95% CI 0.181–0.852], compared with no PED; P = 0.018).

Conclusion

Compared to patients who received the PRN treatment regimen, stable patients with nAMD who received the T&E treatment regimen could better maintain stability when the treatments were suddenly interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, patients with type 1 CNV or patients with PED were more likely to remain stable. At present, the COVID-19 pandemic is becoming increasingly normalized, and the T&E regimen can become a more advanced treatment option for patients undergoing therapy.

IMPACT OF FLUID COMPARTMENTS ON FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES FOR PATIENTS WITH NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Systematic Literature Review

PURPOSE

Understanding the impact of fluid in different retinal compartments is critical to developing treatment paradigms that optimize visual acuity and reduce treatment burden in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. This systematic review aimed to determine the impact of persistent/new subretinal fluid, intraretinal fluid, and subretinal pigment epithelial fluid on visual acuity over 1 year of treatment.

METHODS

Publication eligibility and data extraction were conducted according to Cochrane methods: 27 of the 1,797 screened records were eligible.

RESULTS

Intraretinal fluid negatively affected visual acuity at baseline and throughout treatment, with foveal intraretinal fluid associated with lower visual acuity than extrafoveal intraretinal fluid. Some studies found that subretinal fluid (particularly subfoveal) was associated with higher visual acuity at Year 1 and longer term, and others suggested subretinal fluid did not affect visual acuity at Years 1 and 2. Data on the effects of subretinal pigment epithelial fluid were scarce, and consensus was not reached. Few studies reported numbers of injections associated with fluid status.

CONCLUSION

To optimally manage neovascular age-related macular degeneration, clinicians should understand the impact of fluid compartments on visual acuity. After initial treatment, antivascular endothelial growth factor regimens that tolerate stable subretinal fluid (if visual acuity is stable/improved) but not intraretinal fluid may enable patients to achieve their best possible visual acuity. Confirmatory studies are required to validate these findings.

Short-Term Outcomes After COVID-19-Related Treatment Interruption Among Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Receiving Intravitreal Bevacizumab

Purpose

To assess outcomes and recovery strategy of patients undergoing intravitreal injections for exudative age-related macular degeneration who experienced COVID-19 related interruption in treatment during complete lockdown.

Methods

This was a retrospective, observational case study. We used a mixed effect model with random intercepts to evaluate best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) accounting for measured central macular thickness (CMT) and individual variability of each eye. Furthermore, we analysed measures of the pigmented epithelium detachment as well as presence of subretinal fluid and intraretinal cysts.

Results

We included 39 patients and we found a significant reduction in the BCVA between the pre- and post-lockdown controlling for CMT. There was no significant difference in pigmented epithelium detachment and in presence of subretinal fluid and intraretinal cysts.

Conclusion

We detected a significant loss in visual function. The magnitude of the average loss was, however, limited suggesting good efficacy of the recovery strategy.

Five-Year Reactivation After Ranibizumab or Aflibercept Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Purpose: To evaluate 5-year reactivation after ranibizumab or aflibercept treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: This retrospective study included 192 patients (192 eyes) who had been diagnosed with neovascular AMD or PCV and treated with ranibizumab or aflibercept. The incidence and timing of lesion reactivation during the 5-year follow-up period were evaluated, and the factors associated with reactivation were also investigated. Results: During the follow-up period, lesion reactivation was noted in 156 patients (81.3%) at a mean of 9.5 ± 10.5 months after the third antivascular endothelial growth factor injection. The incidence of reactivation was 59.9% during the first 12 months, 33.7% during ≥12 and <24 months, 11.8% during >24 and ≤36 months, 15.5% during >36 and ≤48 months, and 5.3% during >48 and ≤60 months. There was a significant difference in the incidence among the 5 periods (P < 0.001). The proportion of PCV was significantly higher in patients experiencing reactivation (51.9%) than in those who did not (30.6%) (P = 0.021). Conclusions: During the 5-year follow-up, lesion reactivation was noted in approximately four-fifths of the patients. The incidence of lesion reactivation was highest during the first 12 months and decreased thereafter. The incidence was higher in patients with PCV than in those with neovascular AMD, especially after 12 months.

Discontinuation and loss to follow-up rates in clinical trials of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections

PURPOSE

Clinical trials are often designed to include homogenous, highly specific patient populations with many resources to reduce patient dropout. Results may not translate to real-world settings. We evaluated discontinuation and loss to follow-up (LTFU) rates in clinical trials of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections for diabetic macular edema (DME), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

METHODS

Retrospective meta-epidemiological study. The authors queried ClinicalTrials.gov for all completed trials of anti-VEGF injections for DME, AMD, or RVO. Of 658 trials identified, 582 were excluded for being non-interventional, <100 patients, terminating early, or missing study results. The remaining 76 trials of 27,823 patients were analyzed for discontinuation and LTFU rates.

RESULTS

Mean discontinuation rate was 12.44% (SD 8.12%, range 0-54.12%), with higher rates among control (18.87%) than treatment arms (10.78%, p = .006). Mean LTFU rate was 1.84% (SD 1.78%, range 0-7.76%), with no differences by disease, treatment type, or treatment frequency.

CONCLUSION

Discontinuation rates of major intravitreal anti-VEGF clinical trials were highly variable, suggesting even trials struggle with overall patient retention. Though trial LTFU rates were low, real-world outcomes may differ due to higher reported LTFU rates, which should be considered when extrapolating trial results to clinical practice.

The Effect of Treatment Discontinuation During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Visual Acuity in Exudative Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: 1-Year Results

Introduction

To evaluate the effect of a 9-week treatment deferral due to healthcare restrictions caused by Austria’s first governmental lockdown associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on visual acuity (VA) in eyes compromised by exudative neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) after 1 year.

Methods

Retrospective data collection of 98 eyes (98 patients) with a treatment discontinuation at a tertiary eye care center (Clinic Landstraße, Vienna Healthcare Group, Austria) between March 16 and May 4, 2020. Prior to the lockdown, patients received multiple intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor with a personalized treatment interval for 3 years on average and at least three IVI after the lockdown.

Results

When the treatment interval doubled to 117.6 ± 31.4 days in spring 2020, patients lost 2.2 ± 4.6 ETDRS letters (p = 0.002) on average before reinitiating therapy. In total, 4.1 ± 8.1 letters (p < 0.0001) were lost despite continuous individual re-treatment over the course of the next year. In a univariate analysis, the extended interval time remained statistically significant (p < 0.0001), indicating a larger VA reduction within intervals with increasing interval time in days.

Conclusion

The short-term treatment interruption had a persistent negative impact on the VA course of eyes under therapy after 1 year. Continuous therapy independent of the underlying treatment regimen remains of utmost importance in exudative nAMD. Our data should create awareness to regulators regarding future decisions despite the global pandemic.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-021-00381-y.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of legal blindness in developed countries. Wet AMD refers to the existence of new vessel growth in the macular, the part of the retina with the highest concentration of photoreceptors and hence the best visual acuity. The gold standard therapy of wet AMD consists of repeated injections of an antibody against new vessel formation into the eye to stabilize the disease. The sudden break of a treatment regimen for an individual person has never been investigated as it is ethically not acceptable. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and its associated lockdown led to an emerging situation in spring, 2020. We were forced by governmental restrictions to minimize contact with the most vulnerable patient cohort—the elderly. As an initial consequence, the Medical Retina Unit of Department of Ophthalmology (Clinic Landstraße, Vienna Healthcare Group, Austria) postponed appointments of patients with only one eye afflicted by wet AMD. This study examined the effect of a short-term treatment deferral caused by the first national COVID-19 lockdown in eyes of patients with ongoing therapy of wet AMD in Austria. The break led to a persistent visual loss despite re-treatment, which was still evident after 1 year. Our findings provide further support for an adequate and permanent therapy of wet AMD and regard intravitreal injections as urgent standard of care. It should be taken into consideration by authorities in future pandemic planning.

Proportion and Reasons for Ineligibility to Re-register for Extended Health Insurance in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Purpose: To evaluate the proportion and reasons for ineligibility to re-register for extended health insurance at 5 years in patients diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and registered for extended health insurance. Methods: This retrospective study was performed in patients diagnosed with neovascular AMD and registered for extended health insurance with follow-up for at least 5 years. The criteria for re-registration for extended health insurance were determined along with the ineligibility for re-registration. Results: In total, 263 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 148 (56.3%) did not satisfy the criteria for re-registration. No active treatment was performed in 98 patients during the last 6 months of the study period (no recurrence, 51 patients; additional treatment was not considered beneficial due to retinal damage even without disciform scar formation, 44 patients). Macular disciform scar formation was noted in 50 patients (33.8%). Older age (p = 0.013), poor visual acuity (p = 0.004), and retinal angiomatous proliferation (p < 0.001) were associated with ineligibility for re-registration due to severe retinal damage. Conclusions: Among the patients who were initially registered for extended health insurance, 56.3% failed to satisfy the re-registration criteria. The primary reason was advanced retinal damage. The results of this study provide useful information for patient education and to establish long-term treatment strategies.

Factors of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy Withdrawal in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Implications for Improving Patient Adherence

We investigated the factors associated with the discontinuation of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Japanese patients with AMD aged ≥50 years, reporting at least one prior injection of an anti-VEGF drug, completed an online survey covering reasons for discontinuation or dissatisfaction with therapy, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) and patient activation (PAM-13). The respondents were divided into two cohorts: Cohort 1-patients who discontinued anti-VEGF therapy (n = 207); Cohort 2-patients continuing anti-VEGF therapy (n = 65). The most common reason for discontinuing therapy was the "doctor's decision" in 89.4% (Cohort 1-1). In the other 22 (10.6%) patients in Cohort 1 (Cohort 1-2), reasons included "no deterioration in vision", "financial burden" and "ineffective treatment". Patients in Cohort 2 were dissatisfied with "long waiting times" (77%), "financial burden" and "ineffective treatment". Pain/discomfort posed the greatest impact on quality of life. Only 5% of patients in Cohorts 1-1 and 2 and none in Cohort 1-2 were considered advocates for their own health. In conclusion, most patients who discontinued anti-VEGF therapy did so at their doctor's decision. Addressing the reasons associated with discontinuation or dissatisfaction with anti-VEGF therapies might help improve their continuation.

Delayed follow-up of medical retina patients due to COVID-19: impact on disease activity and visual acuity

Purpose

The coronavirus pandemic has prompted unprecedented delays to treatment with anti-VEGF intravitreal injections due to the need to reduce hospital attendances and prioritise the patients at highest risk of vision loss. This study aims to quantify the effect of these delays on visual acuity (VA) outcomes and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features for patients receiving treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), retinal vein occlusions (RVO) and diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and correlate to the Royal College of Ophthalmologists guidelines (RCOphth).

Methods

A retrospective data analysis of an electronic medical record was performed on a random sample of eyes receiving anti-VEGF injections for nAMD, RVO or DMO. Data collected included age, sex, reason for injection, number of weeks delay if > 8 weeks from that planned, VA at baseline and follow-up and the OCT features, if delayed. For those eyes not delayed, a visual acuity at 20 weeks was recorded to provide a control group.

Results

A sample of 981 eyes (858 patients) were analysed. There was a delay in review of 8 weeks or more in 39.6% of patients of which 30.4% had since returned for review (28.4% nAMD, 37.6% RVO and 30.0% DMO). There was no demographic difference identified between the delayed and non-delayed patients; however, the delayed group was significantly more likely to have better vision in their non-treated eye (p = 0.0003). A statistically significant difference was found in the change in VA between the delayed and the not-delayed group for eyes with nAMD (p = 0.001) but not for RVO or DMO. For the delayed group, mean CMT increased by 33 and 100 μm, respectively, for nAMD and RVO and decreased by 7.8 μm for DMO. The VA of 89.7% of DMO eyes returned to baseline, compared to 74.6% and 76.9% of nAMD and RVO eyes.

Conclusion

The RCOphth guidance to prioritise intravitreal injections for nAMD over DMO appears appropriate in this cohort but not for RVO. Eyes with nAMD experienced the greatest loss of vision with treatment delay, and nAMD and RVO eyes were less likely to return to baseline on restarting treatment.

CONSEQUENCES OF LAPSES IN TREATMENT WITH VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR INHIBITORS IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION IN ROUTINE CLINICAL PRACTICE

PURPOSE

Evaluating outcomes in patients receiving intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration whom experience a lapse in treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review evaluating 3,304 patients ≥18 years who experienced treatment lapses ≥3 months compared with control counterparts. Demographic information, macular thickness as measured by central subfield thickness, and visual acuity were collected at baseline, the first postlapse appointment, and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the lapse for the study group.

RESULTS

Lapse (n = 241) and control patients (n = 241) had similar baseline visual acuity and central subfield thickness (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study: 58.9 ± 20.2 [20/63] vs. 59.2 ± 20.1 [20/63]; central subfield thickness: 252.4 ± 63.2 µm vs. 259.8 ± 66.2 µm, P = 0.21). Analysis revealed that lapse patients experienced a significant increase in central subfield thickness after lapse when compared with controls (279.4 ± 86.9 µm vs. 253.7 ± 65.9 µm, P < 0.01), which normalized on resumption of treatment (259.1 ± 79 µm vs. 246.8 ± 57.6 µm, P = 0.06). Study patients also experienced loss in the visual acuity after lapse when compared with controls (52.9 ± 23.6 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [20/100] vs. 59.9 ± 20.8 [20/63] Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, P < 0.01) that did not recover through 12 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who have lapses in care are at risk for poorer outcomes. Although macular thickness normalizes on resumption of treatment, their decline in the visual acuity does not recover.

Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on neovascular age-related macular degeneration and response to delayed Anti-VEGF treatment

Objectives

To investigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment course of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients who received anti-VEGF injection therapy with real-life data.

Methods

This retrospective study consisted of 116 eyes of 106 patients. Ophthalmic examination, assessment of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings and data of last two visits before restrictions (V-2 and V-1) and the first visit (V0) after the release of national lockdown and subsequent visits (V1 and Vlast) were recorded. The lockdown period was determined by the time interval between March 11 and June 1, 2020.

Main results

The injection interval before V-1 was significantly longer than the interval after V0 (2.56 ± 0.9 vs. 2.14 ± 0.8 months, P = 0.02). While the median central macular thickness (CMT) was significantly increased at V0 compared to V-1 [274(132–711) vs. 238(136–628), P < 0.001], the median CMT was significantly lower at V1 compared to V0 [256 (136–591) vs. 274(132–711), P = 0.003]. The median BCVA was 0.67(0.1–1.1) logMAR at V-1 and significantly worsened to 0.78 (0.1–1.2) logMAR at V0 (P = 0.003). Although the median BCVA improved to 0.69 logMAR (0.1–1.2) at Vlast, the difference did not reach statistical significance compared to V0 (P = 0.08).

Conclusion

Treatment delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic cause progression of nAMD and visual impairment. To plan more frequent anti-VEGF treatments and visits may be an appropriate approach until the disease stabilizes. However, it should be kept in mind that despite the improvement in OCT findings, the desired success in VA could not be achieved in the short term.

Nonadherence or Nonpersistence to Intravitreal Injection Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review

TOPIC

Systematic review of risk factors for nonadherence and nonpersistence to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Lack of adherence (nonadherence) or undertreatment (nonpersistence) with respect to evidence from clinical trials remains a significant barrier to optimizing real-world outcomes for patients with nAMD. Contributing factors and strategies to address this are poorly understood.

METHODS

Studies that reported factors for nonadherence and nonpersistence to anti-VEGF therapy as well as studies examining strategies to improve this were included. Trial eligibility and data extraction were conducted according to Cochrane review methods. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Method Assessment Tool and certainty of evidence evaluated according to the GRADE Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research tool. Data were collated descriptively.

RESULTS

Of the 1284 abstract results screened, 124 articles were assessed in full and 37 studies met the inclusion criteria. Definitions of nonadherence and nonpersistence varied or were not reported. Nonpersistence occurred early, with up to 50% of patients stopping treatment by 24 months. High rates of nonadherence were similarly reported, occurring in 32% to 95% of patients. Certainty of this finding was downgraded to a moderate level because of the heterogeneity in definitions used across studies. Multiple factors determine nonadherence and nonpersistence, including at the condition, therapy, patient, social/economic, and health systems/healthcare team levels. Moderate quality evidence points to lower baseline vision and poorer response to treatment as condition-related variables. The effects of other factors were of lower certainty, predominantly due to small numbers and potential biases in retrospective assessment. Although many factors are not modifiable (e.g., patient comorbidity), other factors are potentially correctable (e.g., lack of transport or mismatched patient expectations). Evidence on strategies to improve adherence and persistence is limited, but where available, these have proven effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of factors related to poor patient adherence and persistence in nAMD could help identify at-risk populations and improve real-world outcomes. Further work is required to develop uniform definitions and establish high-quality evidence on interventions that can be easily implemented.

Impact of a Patient Support Program on Patient Beliefs About Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Persistence to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare persistence between patients prescribed intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in Australia enrolled on a patient support program (PSP) with that of a sample of patients from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) dataset (10% PBS sample); explore predictors of persistence; describe changes in patient beliefs over the course of their enrollment in a PSP for patients treated with IVT-AFL for nAMD; and assess patient satisfaction.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Participants prescribed IVT-AFL for the treatment of nAMD were invited to participate in the PSP. The PSP provided tailored support to patients through provision of a welcome pack, structured telephone calls, and information booklets. Persistence was defined in the PSP as the time from the start date in the program, until discontinuation from the program; and as the time from initial prescription until 6-months after the date of last prescription in the 10% PBS set. Persistence on the program and risk of discontinuation were modeled using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards. In addition, persistence was compared between patients on the PSP and a 10% PBS sample of patients prescribed IVT-AFL for nAMD.

RESULTS

Persistence on treatment at 24 months was significantly higher in patients enrolled on the PSP compared to the PBS cohort (88% vs 64%, p<0.05). The risk of discontinuation in patients enrolled on the PSP was higher in patients identified at screening as "high-risk", those who were younger, or those with significant distance to travel for treatment. During the PSP, patients reported significant increase in their belief that they had control over their condition (6.1 ± 3.5 to 6.8 ± 3.7; p=0.0034) and a reduction in concerns about treatment. Satisfaction with the PSP was high.

CONCLUSION

Patients provided with access to a PSP showed better persistence on treatment and improved beliefs about nAMD disease and its treatment compared to those in the PBS sample. Improved persistence rates may translate into better outcomes for the patient and the healthcare system, however, further research is required to determine which elements of the program are most beneficial, particularly to those at high risk of discontinuation.

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in China

We evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on anti-VEGF treatment in ophthalmology patients in a single hospital in northern China. A total of 93 anti-VEGF injections were administered to 85 eyes of 72 patients at The China Medical University First Hospital Department of Ophthalmology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared to the same period in 2019, the number of injections decreased by 70%. Fifty-nine eyes of 46 patients were receiving 3+PRN anti-VEGF treatment prior to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic; all of these patients experienced treatment interruptions due to COVID-19-associated reasons. Anatomic and functional outcomes suggest that patients with anti-VEGF treatment interruptions are at risk for severe adverse visual sequelae. Moreover, deferred anti-VEGF treatment due to patient-related or department-related reasons during the COVID-19 pandemic may result in poor visual outcomes for new patients. Our results suggest that COVID-19 has had a significant negative effect on anti-VEGF treatment in ophthalmology patients. Detailed guidance from global experts in ophthalmology is highly sought after in these challenging circumstances.

Systematic review: non-adherence and non-persistence in intravitreal treatment

Purpose

Intravitreal injection of VEGF inhibitors has become the standard of care for different macular diseases within the last years resulting in improved visual outcomes. Under real-life conditions, however, the necessity for frequent retreatments and reexaminations poses a burden for patients and treatment centers. Non-adherence and non-persistence to intravitreal treatment may lead to inferior clinical outcomes, and knowledge of contributing factors is crucial to improve adherence. This systematic review analyzes current literature for potential factors involved in non-adherence and non-persistence.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Embase including three different aspects of intravitreal injection therapy: (1) diseases with intravitreal injections as treatment, (2) intravitreal injection, and (3) aspects of therapy adherence or therapy persistence. Data from identified quantitative studies were further extracted and grouped according to WHO criteria (condition, socio-economy, therapy, patient, and health system). The methodological quality of identified studies was graded. Identified qualitative studies (i.e., interviews) were descriptively analyzed and their findings narratively reported.

Results

Twenty-four publications were included. In 16 of those publications, a quantitative data analysis was conducted, analyzing factors associated with non-adherence. Worse visual acuity at baseline and unfavorable development of visual acuity, higher age, and greater distance to the treatment center were associated with non-adherence, while there was inconsistent evidence for an association of comorbidity. In qualitative studies, high follow-up/treatment burden, fear and anxiety, disappointed patient expectations, and lack of motivation to continue treatment were reported as reasons for non-persistence.

Conclusions

Knowledge of potential barriers in IVT treatment may improve adherence and potentially clinical results. Improvements can be achieved particularly in the healthcare complex (organizational improvements) and the “patient” complex by establishing realistic expectations. Recurrent education of the patient may be necessary.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00417-020-04798-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Incremental economic burden associated with exudative age-related macular degeneration: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

The exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) causes considerable healthcare costs for patients and healthcare system, which are expected to grow as the population ages. The objective of this study was to assess the incremental economic burden of exudative AMD by comparing total healthcare costs between the exudative AMD group and non-AMD group to understand economic burden related to exudative AMD.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the National Health Insurance Service database including the entire Korean population. Exudative AMD group included individuals with at least one claim for ranibizumab and one claim using the registration code for exudative AMD (V201). Non-AMD group was defined as individuals without any claims regarding the diagnostic code of H35.3 or ranibizumab. The exudative AMD group and non-AMD group were matched using a propensity-score model. Incremental healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs were measured during a one-year follow-up by employing econometric models: ordinary least squares (OLS) with log transformation and heteroscedastic retransformation; and generalized linear model (GLM) with a log link function and gamma distribution.

RESULTS

A total of 7119 exudative AMD patients were matched to 7119 non-AMD patients. The number of outpatient visits was higher in the exudative AMD group (P-value < 0.0001), while the length of hospitalization was shorter in exudative AMD group (P-value < 0.0001). Exudative AMD patients had total costs 2.13 times (95%CI, 2.08-2.17) greater than non-AMD group using OLS, and total costs 4.06 times (95%CI, 3.82-4.31) greater than non-AMD group using GLM. Annual incremental total costs were estimated as $5519 (OLS) and $3699 (GLM).

CONCLUSIONS

Exudative AMD was associated with significantly increased healthcare costs compared to the non-AMD group. Attention is needed to manage the socioeconomic burden of exudative AMD.

Loss to Follow-up Among Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Who Received Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections

Importance

Loss to follow-up (LTFU) after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections increases the risk of vision loss among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Objective

To report rates of LTFU among patients with nAMD after anti-VEGF injections and to identify risk factors associated with LTFU in this population.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study of data from 9007 patients who received anti-VEGF injections for treatment of nAMD was performed at an urban, private retina practice with multiple locations from April 1, 2012, to January 12, 2016.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Rates of LTFU after anti-VEGF injections. Loss to follow-up was defined as receipt of 1 or more injections with no subsequent follow-up visit within 12 months.

Results

Among the 9007 patients (mean [SD] age, 81.2 [8.8] years; 5917 [65.7%] female; 7905 [87.8%] white), 2003 (22.2%) were LTFU. Odds of LTFU were greater among patients 81 to 85 years of age (odds ratio [OR], 1.58; 95% CI, 1.38-1.82; P < .001), 86 to 90 years of age (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 2.00-2.62; P < .001), and more than 90 years of age (OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 2.83-3.86; P < .001) compared with patients 80 years of age and younger. Odds of LTFU among African American patients (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.00-2.16; P = .05), Asian patients (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.71-4.03; P < .001), patients of other race (OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.38-6.82; P = .006), and patients of unreported race (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.96-2.68; P < .001) were greater than odds of LTFU among white patients. Odds of LTFU were greater among patients with regional adjusted gross income of $50 000 or less (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.30-1.79; P < .001), $51 000 to $75 000 (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.17-1.56; P < .001), and $76 000 to $100 000 (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08-1.50; P = .004) compared with patients with incomes greater than $100 000. Odds of LTFU for patients living 21 to 30 miles (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.05-1.69; P = .02) and more than 30 miles (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.28-1.88; P < .001) from clinic were greater compared with patients who lived 10 miles or less from the clinic. Odds of LTFU were greater among patients who received unilateral injections (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.28-1.61; P < .001) than among patients who received bilateral injections.

Conclusions and Relevance

We found a high rate of LTFU after anti-VEGF injections among patients with nAMD and identified multiple risk factors associated with LTFU among this population. Although our results may not be generalizable, data on LTFU in a clinical practice setting are needed to understand the scope of the problem so that interventions may be designed to improve outcomes.

Outcomes of Eyes Lost to Follow-up with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Receiving Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

PURPOSE

To determine outcomes of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections who return after a period of being lost to follow-up (LTFU).

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Eyes that received intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept for nAMD and were LTFU for >6 months.

METHODS

Comparison of visual outcomes and structural parameters at the visit before LTFU, return visit, and final visit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity (VA), presence of subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid, and central foveal thickness (CFT) by OCT.

RESULTS

A total of 93 eyes of 77 patients were included in the analysis. Mean duration from date of LTFU to return was 346 (±122) days. Overall, 53.7% of patients had worse median logMAR VA by the final visit. Median logMAR VA worsened from 0.60 (0.40-2.00) (Snellen 20/80 [20/50-20/2000]) at the visit before LTFU to 1.00 (0.48-2.00) (20/200 [20/60-20/2000]) at the return visit (P < 0.001). Median logMAR VA remained worse at 6- and 12-months after return from LTFU: 1.00 (0.48-2.00) (20/200 [20/60-20/2000]) (P = 0.001) and 0.70 (0.44-1.30) (20/100 [20/55-20/399]) (P = 0.004), respectively. Despite a mean of 383 (±270) days of follow-up after returning and 5.0 (±5.1) additional injections, the median logMAR VA remained worse at 1.00 (0.54-2.00) (20/200 [20/70-20/2000]) at the final visit compared with the visit before LTFU (P < 0.001). There was greater worsening in mean logMAR VA from the visit before LTFU to the final visit in eyes that received bevacizumab (0.32) and ranibizumab (0.28) compared with aflibercept (P = 0.003, P = 0.04, and P = 0.03, respectively). Mean CFT increased from 201 (±106) μm at the visit before LTFU to 240 (±147) μm at return (P = 0.004). By the final visit, the mean CFT had decreased to 183 (±101) μm, which was not significantly different from the visit before LTFU (P = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes with nAMD receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF that were LTFU experience significant VA decline at the return visit that persists on final follow-up despite normalization of CFT.