Refractive and visual outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty vs deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with hydrodissection for treatment of keratoconus. Cornea. 2013;32:e2-e5. [PMID: 22929159 DOI: 10.1097/ico.0b013e31825ca70b]

Descemetic Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty versus Penetrating Keratoplasty in Advanced Keratoconus: Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes

Purpose

To assess and contrast the visual and refractive results of Descemetic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in the treatment of advanced keratoconus.

Design

Retrospective, comparative, interventional study.

Methods

This study enrolled eyes affected by keratoconus with preoperative mean keratometry ≥60 diopters (D) that were treated with either Descemetic DALK (30 eyes) or PK (29 eyes) by using always the same corneal diameters (8.00mm recipient; 8.25mm donor cornea) and the same suture technique (10-0 nylon double-running 12-bites continuous suture). The outcome measures were postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), subjective refractive astigmatism (SRAst), and keratometric astigmatism at 3mm area (SimK), spherical equivalent (SEq).

Results

Postoperative visual acuity significantly improved in both groups. Mean CDVA was higher in the DALK group 3 months (DALK 0.61, PK 0.42, p<0.05), 6 months (DALK 0.69, PK 0.44, p<0.05), and 12 months (DALK 0.72, PK 0.45, p<0.05) postoperatively. However, 6 months after suture removal, CDVA was not statistically different between the two groups (DALK 0.71, PK 0.75, p>0.05). Final SRAst and SimK also were comparable between the two groups (respectively DALK 2.97, PK:2.81, p>0.05; DALK 3.91, PK 2.37, p>0.05). No significant statistical differences were noted for UCVA and SEq data during the entire follow-up period between the two groups.

Conclusion

Both methods of corneal transplantation resulted in a notable enhancement of visual and refractive outcomes in eyes afflicted by advanced keratoconus. Descemetic DALK demonstrated superior visual acuity before suture removal, whereas DALK and PK exhibited comparable results in terms of visual acuity, refractive correction, and keratometric astigmatism after suture removal.

Long-term outcomes of deep anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus

AIMS

To compare the long-term outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) with penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in keratoconus.

METHODS

Retrospective comparative case series (228 DALKs and 274 PKs). A biphasic linear model was used to describe the postoperative outcome of the endothelial cell density (ECD). Visual acuity, specular microscopy, corneal topography and optical coherence tomography findings were recorded.

RESULTS

Graft survival of the 502 keratoconus eyes was 96.7 at 10 years and 95.6% at 20 years. Visual acuity improved from 20/378±5.1 lines preoperatively to 20/32±2.1 lines at 30 months. The corneal ECD decreased from 2494±382 cells/mm2 to 1521±659 cells/mm2 at 10 years. The mean simulated keratometry increased from 44.88±2.54 D at 1 year to 46.60±3.0 D at 3 years. The mean follow-up was 103.4 months for DALKs and 106.1 months for PKs. The cumulated incidence of postoperative ocular hypertension requiring treatment was significantly higher in PKs than in DALKs. The early- and late-phase rates of ECD loss were significantly lower in DALKs than in PKs. These figures in DALKs were 50% of those observed in PKs. The simulated mean keratometry was significantly higher in DALKs than in PKs in the mid but not in the long term. No significant differences in visual acuity were observed between both groups. Manual dissection-DALK featured slower visual recovery than PK and big bubble-DALK, whereas big bubble-DALK and PK featured similar visual recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

DALK featuring higher endothelial survival and lower risk of postoperative ocular hypertension may be superior to PK when indicated for keratoconus.

Efficacy and safety of intracorneal allogenic ring segment implantation in keratoconus: 1-year results

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segments in the management of keratoconus patients.

METHODS

The retrospective, nonrandomized, interventional case series consisted of 65 keratoconic eyes of 49 consecutive patients who had ring segment-shaped corneal allografts (KeraNatural®) implanted in intrastromal tunnels created using a femtosecond laser. The main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), refraction, keratometry, and pachymetry. Computed tomography scans of the corneal surfaces were also performed preoperatively as well as 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean age was 29.5 ± 7.3 years (median 29, range: 20-52 years). The mean UCVA improved from 0.91 ± 0.50 logMAR preoperatively to 0.40 ± 0.24 logMAR postoperatively at 6 month follow-up (p < 0.01) and the mean CDVA improved from 0.87 ± 0.20 logMAR preoperatively to 0.27 ± 0.06 logMAR postoperatively (p < 0.01). The mean spherical equivalent improved from -8.82 ± 4.57 to -3.45 ± 4.81D (p < 0.01). Average Keratometry decreased from 49.23 ± 5.22 preoperatively to 45.63 ± 4.89 D postoperatively (p < 0.01). Mean anterior and posterior maximum elevation were also decreased significantly (p < 0.01). In one patient, dislocation of the graft towards the tunnel incision site and dehiscense at the tunnel entrance were observed in the first week of the operation. Yellow-white deposits were observed in the segment tunnels in five cases after 6 months.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that implantation of corneal allograft ring segments is a viable alternative treatment for keratoconus with safety and good visual results.

Keratoconus and the Impact of Treatment on Patients' Quality of Life: A Qualitative Study

INTRODUCTION

Keratoconus has a significant impact on patients' quality of life (QoL), from diagnosis to the advanced stages of the disease. The aim of this research was to identify domains of QoL affected by this disease and its treatment.

METHODS

Phone interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide, with patients with keratoconus stratified according to their current treatment. A board of keratoconus experts helped identify the guide's main themes.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (rigid contact lenses, n = 9; cross-linking, n = 9; corneal ring implants, n = 8; and corneal transplantation, n = 9) were interviewed by qualitative researchers. Phone interviews revealed several QoL domains affected by the disease and its treatments: "psychological", "social life", "professional life", "financial costs" and "student life". All domains were impacted, independently of the treatment history. Few differences were found between treatment regimens and keratoconus stages. Qualitative analysis enabled the development of a conceptual framework based on Wilson and Cleary's model for patient outcomes common to all patients. This conceptual model describes the relationship between patients' characteristics, their symptoms, their environment, their functional visual impairment and the impact on their QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

These qualitative findings supported the generation of a questionnaire to evaluate the impact of keratoconus and its treatment on patients' QoL. Cognitive debriefings confirmed its content validity. The questionnaire is applicable for all stages of keratoconus and treatments and may help tracking change over time in regular clinical settings. Psychometric validation is yet to be performed before its use in research and clinical practices.

Bioengineered corneal tissue for minimally invasive vision restoration in advanced keratoconus in two clinical cohorts

Visual impairment from corneal stromal disease affects millions worldwide. We describe a cell-free engineered corneal tissue, bioengineered porcine construct, double crosslinked (BPCDX) and a minimally invasive surgical method for its implantation. In a pilot feasibility study in India and Iran (clinicaltrials.gov no. NCT04653922 ), we implanted BPCDX in 20 advanced keratoconus subjects to reshape the native corneal stroma without removing existing tissue or using sutures. During 24 months of follow-up, no adverse event was observed. We document improvements in corneal thickness (mean increase of 209 ± 18 µm in India, 285 ± 99 µm in Iran), maximum keratometry (mean decrease of 13.9 ± 7.9 D in India and 11.2 ± 8.9 D in Iran) and visual acuity (to a mean contact-lens-corrected acuity of 20/26 in India and spectacle-corrected acuity of 20/58 in Iran). Fourteen of 14 initially blind subjects had a final mean best-corrected vision (spectacle or contact lens) of 20/36 and restored tolerance to contact lens wear. This work demonstrates restoration of vision using an approach that is potentially equally effective, safer, simpler and more broadly available than donor cornea transplantation.

Penetrating Keratoplasty versus Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty for Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Keratoconus is the most common form of primary corneal thinning. Different methods have been suggested to deal with the condition, including glasses, contact lenses, and surgical interventions, like penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), well-known methods of the latter. This study was conducted to compare the outcomes and side effects of the two mentioned keratoplasty techniques. First, we systematically reviewed all original articles studies on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. Then, the extracted data were pooled and meta-analyzed on each of the intended outcomes. A total of 30 studies were included in which PKP was more commonly performed compared to DALK. We found that adverse outcomes consisting of cataracts, graft rejection, graft failure, High-IOP, and corneal infection, were all more common findings in the PKP groups compared to the DALK groups. However, only for the high-IOP, cataracts, and graft rejection, the analysis of the extracted results demonstrated statistical significance. Overall, the DALK groups demonstrated significantly better results when considering the improvement levels by measuring the Endothelial Cell Count (ECC) and Spherical Equivalent (SE). In addition, though statistically insignificant, the Central Corneal Thickness(CCT), Best Corrected Visual Acuity(BCVA), Topographic Cylinder(TC), Refractive Cylinder values were greater in the PKP groups. Based on our study and with its limitations in mind, we can conclude that DALK can be a relatively safer and more effective procedure. Though, a larger number of high-standard randomized clinical trials still need to be conveyed for more definite conclusions.

Comparison of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and corneal cross-linking in patients with advanced keratoconus

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and corneal cross-linking (CXL) in patients with advanced keratoconus, with the primary aim of assessing CXL as a potential therapeutic alternative.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, multi-center, comparative study.

METHODS

Patients with advanced keratoconus (maximum keratometry reading (K-max) > 58D, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity worse than 0.52logMAR), undergoing either DALK or CXL treatment at four tertiary ophthalmic centers in Wenzhou, Hangzhou, Nanjing and Wuhan were included. Visual acuity, refractive error, corneal topography and complications were evaluated at baseline and at least 2 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

75 eyes of 72 patients were included, of which 37 eyes underwent DALK and 38 eyes, CXL. A larger reduction in Kmax was observed in the DALK group (-18.18 ± 9.44 D versus -1.10 ± 2.70D, p < 0.001). Seven eyes (18%) in the CXL group showed progression of keratoconus. No disease progression was observed in the DALK group. Greater improvements in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (logMAR) were observed in the DALK group (-0.59 ± 0.25 versus -0.24 ± 0.44, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to CXL, DALK leads to larger reductions in Kmax and better improvement in visual acuity in advanced keratoconus.

Comparison of penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus eyes with vernal keratoconjunctivitis

Purpose:

The purpose of the study is to compare outcomes after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) against deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for keratoconus in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC).

Methods:

Keratoconic patients with VKC who received PK (n = 55, group 1) or DALK (n = 62, group 2) were retrospectively enrolled. The Student’s t test, Mann–Whitney test, Fisher’s exact test, chi-square test, and Kaplan–Meier survival curve were used to compare outcomes between the groups.

Results:

The follow-up period was 59.4 ± 44.1 and 62.4 ± 38.9 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.70). Postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.24 ± 0.18 and 0.29 ± 0.19 logMAR, respectively (p = 0.13). Graft rejection occurred in 34.6% and 25.8% of eyes in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.30). Groups 1 and 2 were comparable in the rates of cataract (3.6% and 12.9%, respectively, p = 0.07) and high intraocular pressure (3.6% and 8.1%, respectively, p = 0.31). Compared with the eyes with inactive VKC, PK eyes that experienced postoperative disease reactivation had a higher rate of suture abscesses (10.9% versus 50.0%, respectively, p = 0.01) and suture-tract vascularization (6.5% versus 33.3%, respectively, p = 0.03). Similarly, disease reactivation significantly increased suture abscesses from 27.3% to 51.7% (p = 0.03) and suture-tract vascularization from 18.2% to 49.6% (p = 0.005) in the DALK group. The graft survival rates were 95.3% in group 1 and 87.9% in group 2 at the 4-year follow-up, with mean durations of 14.4 and 11.1 months, respectively (p = 0.20).

Conclusion:

The results indicate no difference in outcomes between PK and DALK for keratoconus in patients with VKC. Postoperative VKC reactivation increased the rate of suture-related problems after both techniques of keratoplasty.

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques; predescemetic versus big bubble: Anterior segment optical coherence tomography study

PURPOSE

To compare the visual and refractive outcomes and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) findings of 2 different deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) techniques in the treatment of advanced keratoconus with and without successful big bubble formation.

METHODS

In this retrospective comparative case series, data from 79 consecutive eyes of 69 patients who underwent either big bubble (group 1, n: 62) or manual DALK (group 2, n: 17) were analyzed. The visual and refractive results, keratometric values and residual stromal thickness were assessed. Patients were seen at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure and 1 month after complete suture removal.

RESULTS

A big bubble was successfully obtained in 62 eyes (78.5%; group 1) and manual dissection was performed in the 17 remaining eyes (21.5%; group 2). The final best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 0.38 logMAR and 0.55 logMAR in Group 1 and 2, respectively (P<0.05). At the final visit, BSCVA≤0.30 logMAR was achieved in 80% and 60.8% of eyes in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P<0.001). Groups 1 and 2 were comparable in terms of mean keratometry: 47.80D±2.81D (range, 41.30D to 54.2D) versus 45.90D±3.62D (range, 41.10D to 53.8 D), respectively; (P=0.56) and keratometric astigmatism: 3.81D± 2.1D (range, 1.0D to 6.20D) versus 3.56D±1.92D (range 1.2D to 6.85D), respectively; (P=0.40) at the final follow-up. The mean residual stromal thickness was 36.90±17.80μm in group 2.

CONCLUSION

The presence of residual posterior corneal stroma when big bubble formation is not successfully achieved in DALK is correlated with lower postoperative visual acuity.

Quality of Vision after Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (Fluid Dissection) Compared to Penetrating Keratoplasty for the Treatment of Keratoconus

Purpose

To compare the visual quality of patients with keratoconus who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) with fluid dissection.

Design

Cross-sectional, observational study.

Methods

Twelve eyes that underwent PKP (PKP group) were compared to 24 eyes that underwent DALK (DALK group) after complete removal of sutures and stability of refraction. Visual, refractive, corneal topographic, corneal aberrometry, and ocular aberrometry parameters were compared for both groups. The χ² and Mann–Whitney U tests were used for comparisons as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (UCVA and BSCVA, resp.), mean refractive spherical equivalent and mean refractive cylinder (MRSE and MRC, resp.), root mean square of the 3 mm and 5 mm OPD Scan (NIDEK Co. Ltd., Gamagori, Japan), steep and flat meridians (SimK1 and SimK2, resp.), and the difference (corneal cylinder) were not statistically significantly different between groups (P > 0.05, all comparisons). All aberrations, point spread functions (PSF), and the modulation transfer function (MTF) were not statistically different between groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

For our small study, the postoperative PKP and DALK with fluid dissection patient groups had vision/optical quality parameters that were not statistically different. This may indicate that DALK with fluid dissection can replace PKP for keratoconus without compromising vision quality.

Surgical outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with air-assisted manual dissection for corneas with previous inflammation or fibrosis

PURPOSE:

To report our experience in air-assisted manual dissection deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for the treatment of corneal scar with previous inflammation and fibrosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed the medical history of 21 patients (male:female = 13:8 mean age 41.9 years old) with corneal pathology from previous infection and inflammation. Trephination diameter ranged from 7.0 to 8.0 mm, and the graft was oversized by 0.25–0.50 mm. Debulking technique was performed to expose Descemet's membrane after filling stroma with air. Starting from postoperative 3 months, selective suture removal was performed to reduce corneal astigmatism.

RESULTS:

The mean follow-up period was 59.9 ± 19.8 (20–96) months. Intraoperative microperforation occurred in 2 eyes (9.5%); however, there was no shift to penetrating keratoplasty. Air-bubble tamponade was performed in 7 eyes (33.3%) for postoperative gapping of the graft. There were 2 failed grafts (9.5%) due to corneal ulcer while all the other grafts remained clear throughout follow-up. The mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.84 ± 0.66 logMAR, which improved to 0.74 ± 0.63 (P < 0.01). The average sphere power was − 0.88 ± 3.88 diopter (D), average cylinder power 3.03 ± 1.46D, and average endothelial count 1877 ± 375 cells/mm².

CONCLUSION:

In severe ocular surface diseases, big-bubble technique frequently failed to separate predescemtic plane; however, it effectively created air-filled stroma which was easier to remove. Although BCVA was suboptimal due to ocular surface disorders, graft survival and clarity rate is high, justifying the application of DALK in these cases.

Systematic review comparing penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for management of keratoconus

AIM

Perception of reduced incidence of graft rejection after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) has attracted many surgeons towards this technique in keratoconus. This review aims to compare the visual, refractive and graft outcomes after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and DALK for keratoconus.

METHODS

Electronic searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database (LILACS), metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT), ClinicalTrial.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) were performed. We included randomized control trials (RCTs) and comparative studies to assess primary and secondary outcomes after PK and DALK in eyes with keratoconus. Primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) LogMAR at ≥6 months. Secondary outcomes included number of patients with BCVA≥0 LogMAR, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) LogMAR, spherical equivalent (SE), refractive and keratometric astigmatism, endothelial cell density (ECD) cell/mm², graft rejection and graft survival.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (including 2 RCTs) compared DALK (965 eyes) and PK (2402 eyes) for keratoconus. There was strong evidence through RCTs suggesting better LogMAR BCVA at ≥6 months and better LogMAR UCVA with PK; reduced refractive astigmatism and rejection with DALK and no difference in SE and keratometric astigmatism. Moreover, there was weak evidence to suggest better BCVA≥0 LogMAR after PK and no difference in ECD between the two techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the popularity of DALK amongst corneal surgeons for keratoconus, there is a paucity of high quality RCTs. The existing limited evidence confirms reduced rejection and refractive astigmatism with DALK but better visual outcomes with PK. Internationally agreed data sets and follow-up protocol are warranted.

Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in Keratoconic Patients with versus without Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis

Purpose:

To compare the clinical outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for keratoconus in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) versus those without VKC.

Methods:

In this retrospective comparative study, records of 262 eyes with keratoconus (Group 1) and 28 keratoconic eyes with VKC (Group 2) that had undergone DALK were compiled. Reviewed parameters included length of follow-up, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error, complications and cumulative graft survival.

Results:

Mean duration of follow-up was 38.6 ± 20.2 and 34.4 ± 20.9 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.21). Mean post-operative BCVA was 0.19 ± 0.11 and 0.20 ± 0.15 logMAR, in groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.79). BCVA≥20/40 was achieved in 91.6 and 88.5% of eyes in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.48). Epithelial problems were encountered in 31.3 and 42.9% of operated eyes, respectively (P = 0.16). Vascularization of suture tracts and stitch abscesses were encountered more frequently in the eyes with VKC (P = 0.01 and <0.001, respectively). At the 33-month follow-up examination, rejection-free graft survival rates were 56.0% in group 1 and 33.3% in group 2, with mean durations of 41.0 and 32.1 months, respectively (P = 0.15). Graft survival rates were 98.1% in group 1 and 95.0% in group 2, with mean durations of 88.6 and 88.4 months, respectively (P = 0.74).

Conclusion:

Clinical outcomes of DALK in keratoconic eyes with VKC were comparable to those in eyes with keratoconus alone. However, complications such as suture tract vascularization and stitch abscesses were more common when VKC coexisted, necessitating closer monitoring.

Comparison of Descemet-On Versus Descemet-Off Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in Keratoconus Patients: A Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

To compare the visual outcomes of Descemet membrane (DM)-on and DM-off after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) using the big-bubble (BB) technique in keratoconus patients.

METHODS

In this prospective trial, keratoconic eyes undergoing DALK procedures with the BB technique were randomized into 2 groups: a donor cornea without DM (group 1; 29 eyes) or with DM (group 2; 30 eyes). These groups were compared with respect to best-corrected visual acuity and contrast sensitivity while wearing gas permeable contact lenses and also endothelial cell counts.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to best-corrected visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using gas permeable contact lenses as well as endothelial cell counts at 3, 6, and 12 months. After 1 year, the mean (±SD) postoperative visual acuity CL (with contact lenses) was 0.05 (±0.01) in the DM-off group and 0.05 (±0.01) in the DM-on group (P = 0.956). Mean postoperative endothelial cell counts were 2425.0 (±123.7) and 2306.7 (79.9), respectively (P = 0.443), and corneal thicknesses were 527.9 (58.3) and 556.6 (47.3), respectively (P = 0.150). During the follow-up period, very few complications occurred and neither group had a predominance of adverse events at 3, 6, 12, or 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, DALK procedures using the BB technique for keratoconus with DM-on or DM-off presented no significant differences regarding the visual outcomes or endothelial cell counts.

Treatment options for advanced keratoconus: A review

Traditionally, the mainstay of treatment for advanced keratoconus (KC) has been either penetrating or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (PK or DALK, respectively). The success of both operations, however, has been somewhat tempered by potential difficulties and complications, both intraoperatively and postoperatively. These include suture and wound-healing problems, progression of disease in the recipient rim, allograft reaction, and persistent irregular astigmatism. Taken together, these have been the inspiration for an ongoing search for less troublesome therapeutic alternatives. These include ultraviolet crosslinking and intracorneal ring segments, both of which were originally constrained in their indication exclusively to eyes with mild to moderate disease. More recently, Bowman layer transplantation has been introduced for reversing corneal ectasia in eyes with advanced KC, re-enabling comfortable contact lens wear and permitting PK and DALK to be postponed or avoided entirely. We offer a summary of the current and emerging treatment options for advanced KC, aiming to provide the corneal specialist useful information in selecting the optimal therapy for individual patients.

Efficacy and safety of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty vs. penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a meta-analysis

Purpose

To evaluate difference in therapeutic outcomes between deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for the clinical treatment of keratoconus.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted in Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of science. Eligible studies should include at least one of the following factors: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), postoperative spherical equivalent (SE), postoperative astigmatism and endothelial cell count (ECC), central corneal thickness (CCT), graft rejection and graft failure, of which BCVA, graft rejection and graft failure were used as the primary outcome measures, and postoperative SE, astigmatism, CCT and ECC as the secondary outcome measures. Given the lack of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), cohort studies and prospective studies were considered eligible.

Results

Sixteen clinical trials involving 6625 eyes were included in this review, including 1185 eyes in DALK group, and 5440 eyes in PKP group. The outcomes were analyzed using Cochrane Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.0 software. The postoperative BCVA in DALK group was significantly better than that in PKP group (OR = 0.48; 95%CI 0.39 to 0.60; p<0.001). There were fewer cases of graft rejection in DALK group than those in PKP group (OR = 0.28; 95%CI 0.15 to 0.50; p<0.001). Nevertheless the rate of graft failure was similar between DALK and PKP groups (OR = 1.05; 95%CI 0.81 to 1.36; p = 0.73). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes of SE (p = 0.70), astigmatism (p = 0.14) and CCT (p = 0.58) between DALK and PKP groups. And ECC in DALK group was significantly higher than PKP group (p<0.001). The postoperative complications, high intraocular pressure (high-IOP) and cataract were analyzed, fewer cases of complications occurred in DALK group than those in PKP group (high-IOP, OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11–0.44, P<0.001) (cataract, OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.08–0.61, P = 0.004). And no cases of expulsive hemorrhage and endophthalmitis were reported.

Conclusion

The visual outcomes for DALK were not equivalent to PKP. The rate of graft failure was similar between DALK and PKP. Fewer postoperative complications occurred in DALK group, indicating that compared with PKP, DALK has lower efficacy but higher safety.

Donor cornea quality used for penetrating keratoplasty vs deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) has recently been introduced as an alternative procedure to penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for corneal pathologies not affecting the corneal endothelium. DALK does not rely on donor endothelium and requires less rigid criteria for donor corneal tissue quality. Therefore, DALK makes it possible to use donor corneas deemed unsuitable for PK. Furthermore, lamellar keratoplasty allows acellular corneal tissue to be transplanted. As a result, long-term preservation techniques are being revisited to increase the availability of donor corneas and subsequently alleviate constraints of availability, cost, storage, and transportation in many countries. The recent alterations in corneal transplantation techniques and hence the type of donor cornea tissues used for each technique, may require corneal surgeons and eye banks to reevaluate their selection criteria. The purpose of this systematic review is to present an updated analysis on the type and quality of donor corneas used for PK and DALK, assess the influence of donor and eye bank factors on the quality of donor corneas, and determine whether any of these donor factors affect clinical outcomes, complications, and graft survivals.

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for treating keratoconus

BACKGROUND

Keratoconus is an ectatic (weakening) disease of the cornea, which is the clear surface at the front of the eye. Approximately 10% to 15% of patients diagnosed with keratoconus require corneal transplantation. This may be full-thickness (penetrating) or partial-thickness (lamellar).

OBJECTIVES

To compare visual outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus, and to compare additional outcomes relating to factors which may contribute to poor visual outcomes (e.g. astigmatism, graft rejection and failure).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched a number of electronic databases including CENTRAL, PubMed and EMBASE without using any date or language restrictions. We last searched the electronic databases on 31 October 2013. We also handsearched the proceedings of several international ophthalmic conferences.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the outcomes of DALK and penetrating keratoplasty in the treatment of keratoconus.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors assessed trial quality and extracted data independently. For dichotomous data (graft failure, rejection, achievement of functional vision) results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous data (postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), keratometric astigmatism and spherical equivalent) results were expressed as mean differences (MDs) and 95% CIs.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified two completed studies, with a total of 111 participants (n = 30 and n = 81), both conducted in Iran, that met our inclusion criteria. Participants had moderate to severe keratoconus pre-operatively and were randomly allocated to receive either DALK or penetrating keratoplasty. Only one eye of each participant was treated as part of the trials. The smaller study had 12 month follow-up data for all participants. For the larger study, four DALK surgeries had to be abandoned due to technical failure and visual and refractive outcomes were not measured in these participants. Follow-up length for the remaining 77 participants ranged from 6.8 to 36.4 months, with all 77 followed for at least three months post-suture removal. Details of the randomisation procedure were unavailable for the smaller study and so sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine if the results from this study had affected the overall results of the review.Neither of the included studies reported a difference between groups on any of the measures of post-graft visual achievement, keratometric astigmatism or spherical equivalent. A single case of graft failure in a penetrating keratoplasty was reported. No postoperative graft failures were reported in the DALK group of either study.Instances of graft rejection were reported in both groups, in both studies. The majority of these cases were successfully treated with steroids. The data, which related to all cases in each study - given that the four cases that did not go ahead as planned had already technically failed without presence of rejection - showed that rejection was less likely to occur in DALK (odds ratio (OR): 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.81, GRADE rating: moderate).Results of the sensitivity analysis indicated that inclusion of the Razmju 2011 study did not bias the results with regards to rejection episodes. While sensitivity analysis showed altered results with regards to failure rates, the data available from the Javadi 2010 study alone had a very wide 95% CI, suggesting an imprecise estimate. Therefore, even after removal of the Razmju 2011 data, it is still difficult to draw conclusions regarding superiority of one technique over another with regards to graft failure.DALK was unable to be completed as planned in four cases and in a further three cases, complications during dissection required further intervention. Other adverse events, of varying severity, were reported in both intervention groups with similar frequency. For both types of surgery, these included postoperative astigmatism, steroid induced ocular hypertension and persistent epithelial defects. In recipients of DALK, one participant had interface neovascularisation (a proliferation of blood vessels where the host and donor cornea come together) and one had wrinkling of Descemet's membrane, the basement membrane separating the corneal stroma from the corneal endothelium. In the penetrating keratoplasty groups, one participant required graft resuturing and one had an atonic pupil, a condition in which the pupil dilates and is non-reactive.Overall, the quality of the evidence was rated as very low to moderate, with methodological limitations, incomplete data analysis and imprecision of findings, as well as high risk of bias in several areas for both studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence to support a difference in outcomes with regards to BCVA at three months post-graft or at any of the other time points analysed (GRADE rating: very low). We also found no evidence of a difference in outcomes with regards to graft survival, final UCVA or keratometric outcomes. We found some evidence that rejection is more likely to occur following penetrating keratoplasty than DALK (GRADE rating: moderate). The small number of studies included in the review and methodological issues relating to the two, mean that the overall quality of the evidence in this review is low. There is currently insufficient evidence to determine which technique may offer better overall outcomes - final visual acuity and time to attain this, keratometric stabilisation, risk of rejection or failure, or both, and risk of other adverse events - for patients with keratoconus. Large randomised trials comparing the outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty and DALK in the treatment of keratoconus are needed.

Donor Descemet-off versus Descemet-on deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: a confocal scan study

PURPOSE

To compare confocal features of grafts following deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) using a donor without Descemet membrane (DM) versus a full-thickness donor with intact DM and endothelium.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative study examined 45 eyes from patients with keratoconus who underwent DALK using the big-bubble technique. The big-bubble technique yielded a bared DM in all keratoconic eyes. Twenty-seven eyes received tissue from a donor without DM (group 1), while 18 received tissue from a full-thickness donor with an intact DM and endothelium (group 2). A group of normal eyes (n = 28, group 3) served as controls. Confocal microscopy was used to determine keratocyte density, explore the donor-recipient interface including clarity and reflectivity, evaluate endothelial cell density and morphology, as well as measure interface depth and central corneal thickness.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up duration was 20.2 ± 8.6 months and 29.6 ± 17.0 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.13). Confocal scan demonstrated that the keratocyte profiles and distribution were more similar to normal corneas in group 2. Significantly more severe interface haziness was observed when donor DM and endothelium was retained (mean interface reflectivity value of 102.7 ± 22.1 versus 161.7 ± 30.0 light reflectance units in groups 1 and 2, respectively, p&lt;0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Graft cellular profiles and healing response at the donor-recipient interface can be profoundly affected depending on whether donor DM and endothelium is removed or retained.

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in case of Hurler-Scheie syndrome

A 12-year-old boy with Hurler-Scheie syndrome (H/S syndrome) reported with reduced vision in both the eyes for past few years. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) was performed for visual rehabilitation in his left eye. During surgery, the predescemet's plane was reached by meticulously dissecting the lamellar fibres using a manual technique. Histopathology of the dissected cornea showed the presence of numerous alcian blue positive deposits corroborating with the diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS). Postoperative course was uneventful. One year following surgery, the graft was clear and had a visual acuity of 20/50 with +1.00 170° - 0.75 refractive correction. Endothelial cell count, as measured by non-contact specular microscopy, was 2473.4 cells/mm(2). This case report highlights the application of DALK in a case of MPS-related corneal stromal opacification.

Corneal blindness and xenotransplantation

Approximately 39 million people are blind worldwide, with an estimated 285 million visually impaired. The developing world shoulders 90% of the world's blindness, with 80% of causative diseases being preventable or treatable. Blindness has a major detrimental impact on the patient, community, and healthcare spending. Corneal diseases are significant causes of blindness, affecting at least 4 million people worldwide. The prevalence of corneal disease varies between parts of the world. Trachoma, for instance, is the second leading cause of blindness in Africa, after cataracts, but is rarely found today in developed nations. When preventive strategies have failed, corneal transplantation is the most effective treatment for advanced corneal disease. The major surgical techniques for corneal transplantation include penetrating keratoplasty (PK), anterior lamellar keratoplasty, and endothelial keratoplasty (EK). Indications for corneal transplantation vary between countries, with Fuchs' dystrophy being the leading indication in the USA and keratoconus in Australia. With the exception of the USA, where EK will soon overtake PK as the most common surgical procedure, PK is the overwhelming procedure of choice. Success using corneal grafts in developing nations, such as Nepal, demonstrates the feasibility of corneal transplantation on a global scale. The number of suitable corneas from deceased human donors that becomes available will never be sufficient, and so research into various alternatives, for example stem cells, amniotic membrane transplantation, synthetic and biosynthetic corneas, and xenotransplantation, is progressing. While each of these has potential, we suggest that xenotransplantation holds the greatest potential for a corneal replacement. With the increasing availability of genetically engineered pigs, pig corneas may alleviate the global shortage of corneas in the near future.

Comparison of descemet-on versus descemet-off deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of retained donor Descemet membrane (DMs) on visual outcomes, contrast sensitivity (CS), higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and central graft thickness after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) using the big-bubble technique.

METHODS

In this retrospective comparative study, keratoconic eyes undergoing a DALK using the big-bubble technique were enrolled. A bared DM was achieved in all cases. A donor cornea without (group 1; 48 eyes) or with (group 2; 22 eyes) DM was sutured to the recipient bed. The 2 groups were compared in terms of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, keratometric astigmatism, refractive error, CS, HOAs, and central graft thickness at least 3 months after complete suture removal. Additionally, the rate of postoperative pseudoanterior chamber formation was compared between the study groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 23.2 ± 6.9 months in group 1 and 26.5 ± 6.5 months in group 2 (P = 0.61). The postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.18 ± 0.08 logMAR and 0.24 ± 0.30 logMAR, respectively (P = 0.36). The 2 groups had comparable postoperative keratometric astigmatism, spherical equivalent refraction, and HOAs. In terms of CS, however, group 1 demonstrated better results at a low spatial frequency. The mean postoperative central graft thickness was greater in group 2 (589.8 ± 34.5 μm) than in group 1 (523.6 ± 63.0 μm; P < 0.001). A pseudoanterior chamber developed in 3 eyes of group 1 and in 2 eyes of group 2 (P = 0.23). All cases were successfully managed by giving an intracameral air injection.

CONCLUSIONS

DALK performed using the big-bubble technique for keratoconus may give better results in terms of CS if a donor cornea without DM is transplanted.