Pain management after photorefractive keratectomy

Postoperative Pain Comparison Between Alcohol-Assisted and Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Using Nepafenac Treatment: A Novel Study

INTRODUCTION

The study aimed to compare postoperative pain between alcohol-assisted and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in patients who received the novel analgesic preoperative nepafenac treatment 2 days preoperatively and 3 days postoperatively. Pain, stinging, tearing, light sensitivity, and stress levels were evaluated.

METHODS

The study included a retrospective analysis of 55 patients divided into two groups: bilateral alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (aa-PRK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transepithelial-PRK). Nepafenac was administered for pain control for all patients, with patients receiving four drops for 2 days before the surgery and 3 days postoperatively per clinical instructions. Patients completed questionnaires on the day of the surgery and for the first 5 days postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using XLSTAT (version 2023.1.2). t-Test was used to analyze and compare pain and symptom levels and Fisher's exact test for categorical data. p-Values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study examined 55 patients (49% female) with a mean age of 25.11 ± 6.81 years who had undergone bilateral surface refractive surgery to correct myopic errors. The mean baseline standard error (SE) was -3.16 ± 2.20 D. Among these patients, 27 patients underwent aa-PRK and 28 patients underwent transepithelial-PRK. Higher levels of pain were significant in the aa-PRK group (p = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference between the groups in the average levels of stinging, tearing, or light sensation. Additionally, stress levels decreased over time in both groups, with levels becoming almost equal after 5 days, and there was no significant difference in the average stress levels between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found that patients who underwent the transepithelial-PRK procedure had significantly lower pain levels compared with those who underwent aa-PRK after being treated with nepafenac per protocol. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of stinging, tearing, light sensation, and stress levels.

Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for management of pain after PRK: systematic review and network meta-analysis

TOPIC

Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for management of pain in patients after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Pain after PRK is a major concern for both patients and surgeons. Although evidence supports the use of NSAIDs postoperatively, no consensus exists regarding the preferred regimen. The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different topical NSAIDs.

METHODS

This study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023417651). A systematic search of electronic databases was performed, for randomized controlled trials reporting topical NSAIDs' outcomes of corneal re-epithelization, rescue analgesics intake, and pain in days 0 to 3 after PRK (postoperative days [PODs] 0 to 3). Studies were graded for risk of bias. Data were extracted, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were evaluated in a network meta-analysis in accordance with the Cochrane's guidelines, to which a frequentist approach model was fitted. Transitivity was assessed using the net split method. Treatment effectiveness was ranked using forest plots based on comparison with placebo. P-scores (P) and league tables were used to examine combined direct and indirect comparisons.

RESULTS

Of 1540 studies identified, 27 were included. These encompassed 2286 patients across 11 countries, evaluating 7 distinct topical NSAIDs. At POD0, ketorolac (P 0.764), flurbiprofen (P 0.763), and bromfenac (P 0.717) were the most efficient drugs overall and displayed significantly lower pain scores than placebo. Other than that, flurbiprofen held the highest rank for reported pain throughout, significantly outperforming placebo on POD1 (P 0.874, SMD -1.19, 95% CI -1.86 to -0.52), POD2 (P 0.882, SMD -1.05, 95% CI -1.82 to -0.27), and POD3 (P 0.939, SMD -1.14, 95% CI -2.1 to -0.18). Other NSAIDs were significantly better than placebo only on POD1 and POD0. Rescue analgesic intake analysis favored indomethacin (P 0.834, SMD -0.8, 95% CI -1.33 to -0.27), ketorolac, and diclofenac. Compared with placebo, re-epithelization was slowed to different significances with all NSAIDs but flurbiprofen (P 0.991, SMD -0.7, 95% CI -1.38 to -0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Flurbiprofen was favorable in pain scores on typically painful postoperative days and re-epithelization times. However, analgesics intake, a more objective outcome, suggested superiority of other NSAIDs. Inconsistencies may be explained by the small sample size. For clinical interpretation, NSAID effect sizes should be taken into consideration.

Drug-eluting contact lenses: Progress, challenges, and prospects

Topical ophthalmic solutions (eye drops) are becoming increasingly popular in treating and preventing ocular diseases for their safety, noninvasiveness, and ease of handling. However, the static and dynamic barriers of eyes cause the extremely low bioavailability (<5%) of eye drops, making ocular therapy challenging. Thus, drug-eluting corneal contact lenses (DECLs) have been intensively investigated as a drug delivery device for their attractive properties, such as sustained drug release and improved bioavailability. In order to promote the clinical application of DECLs, multiple aspects, i.e., drug release and penetration, safety, and biocompatibility, of these drug delivery systems were thoroughly examined. In this review, we systematically discussed advances in DECLs, including types of preparation materials, drug-loading strategies, drug release mechanisms, strategies for penetrating ocular barriers, in vitro and in vivo drug delivery and penetration detection, safety, and biocompatibility validation methods, as well as challenges and future perspectives.

Topical Ophthalmic Anesthetics for CornealAbrasions: Findings from a Cochrane SystematicReview and Meta-Analysis

Background

Despite potential benefit, outpatient use of topical ophthalmic anesthetics can result in poor healing, infection, scar, and blindness. An unbiased analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is needed to examine their effectiveness and safety compared with placebo or other treatments for corneal abrasions.

Methods

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase.com, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched on February 10, 2023, without restriction on language or publication date.

Results

Systematic review and meta-analysis of nine RCTs describing 314 participants with post-traumatic abrasions and 242 participants with post-surgical abrasions, with a median study length of 7 days (interquartile range, 7-14), show no evidence of a difference in pain control between anesthetics and placebo at 24 hours in post-trauma cases. Self-reported pain at 24 hours is reduced with anesthetics plus topical nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drug in post-surgical participants (mean difference [MD], -5.72 on a 10-point scale; 95% CI, -7.35 to -4.09; 1 RCT; 30 participants) and at 48 hours with anesthetics alone in post-trauma participants (MD, -5.68; 95% CI, -6.38 to -4.98; 1 RCT; 111 participants). Anesthetics are associated with 37% increased risk of non-healing defects (risk ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.78 to 2.42; 3 RCTs; 221 post-trauma participants). All evidence is of very low certainty. Over 50% of trials have an overall high risk of bias.

Conclusions

Available evidence is insufficient to support outpatient use of topical anesthetics for corneal abrasions with respect to pain, re-epithelialization, and complication risk.

Ocular surface information seen from the somatosensory thalamus and cortex

Ocular Surface (OS) somatosensory innervation detects external stimuli producing perceptions, such as pain or dryness, the most relevant symptoms in many OS pathologies. Nevertheless, little is known about the central nervous system circuits involved in these perceptions, and how they integrate multimodal inputs in general. Here, we aim to describe the thalamic and cortical activity in response to OS stimulation of different modalities. Electrophysiological extracellular recordings in anaesthetized rats were used to record neural activity, while saline drops at different temperatures were applied to stimulate the OS. Neurons were recorded in the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal ganglion (TG, 49 units), the thalamic VPM-POm nuclei representing the face (Th, 69 units) and the primary somatosensory cortex (S1, 101 units). The precise locations for Th and S1 neurons receiving OS information are reported here for the first time. Interestingly, all recorded nuclei encode modality both at the single neuron and population levels, with noxious stimulation producing a qualitatively different activity profile from other modalities. Moreover, neurons responding to new combinations of stimulus modalities not present in the peripheral TG subsequently appear in Th and S1, being organized in space through the formation of clusters. Besides, neurons that present higher multimodality display higher spontaneous activity. These results constitute the first anatomical and functional characterization of the thalamocortical representation of the OS. Furthermore, they provide insight into how information from different modalities gets integrated from the peripheral nervous system into the complex cortical networks of the brain. KEY POINTS: Anatomical location of thalamic and cortical ocular surface representation. Thalamic and cortical neuronal responses to multimodal stimulation of the ocular surface. Increasing functional complexity along trigeminal neuroaxis. Proposal of a new perspective on how peripheral activity shapes central nervous system function.

Acupoint Selection in Postoperative Ophthalmic Pain Management: A Data Mining Protocol

Background

Postoperative ophthalmic pain not only induces anxiety and depression among patients, but also prolongs the recovery cycle. However, the management of postoperative pain in ophthalmology is still not standardized. The effectiveness of acupuncture in treating postoperative pain has been validated based on numerous clinical trials and meta-analysis. Our study is to conduct the first data mining analysis to identify the most effective acupoints selection and combinations for treating postoperative ophthalmic pain, inform.

Methods

We will search bibliographic databases from inception to November 2023. Clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of acupuncture therapy in the management of postoperative ophthalmic pain will be selected. Reviews, protocols, animal studies, case reports, systematic evaluations and Meta-analyses will be excluded. Primary outcome indicators will be clinical outcomes related to postoperative ophthalmic pain. Descriptive statistics will be performed in Excel 2019. Association rule analysis will be performed in SPSS Modeler 18.0. Exploratory factor analysis and cluster analysis will be performed in SPSS Statistics 25.0.

Results

This study will investigate the most effective point selection and combination of acupuncture points for the treatment of postoperative ophthalmic pain.

Conclusion

Our findings will provide evidence for the effectiveness and potential therapeutic prescription of acupuncture for postoperative ophthalmologic pain, helping clinicians and patients work together to make more informed decisions.

Neuropathic Corneal Pain after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection

INTRODUCTION

This is a case report of a patient with neuropathic corneal pain after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection.

METHODS

A previously healthy 27-year-old female presented with bilateral eye pain accompanied by increased light sensitivity 5 months after COVID-19 infection. She was diagnosed with neuropathic corneal pain based on clear corneas without fluorescein staining, alongside the presence of microneuromas, dendritic cells, and activated stromal keratocytes identified bilaterally on in vivo confocal microscopy.

RESULTS

The patient's tear nerve growth factor, substance P, and calcitonin gene-related peptide levels were 5.9 pg/mL, 2978.7 pg/mL, and 1.1 ng/mL, respectively, for the right eye and 23.1 pg/mL, 4798.7 pg/mL, and 1.2 ng/mL, respectively, for the left eye, suggesting corneal neuroinflammatory status. After 6 weeks of topical 0.1% flurometholone treatment, decreased microneuroma size, less extensive dendritic cells, and reduced tear nerve growth factor and substance P levels were observed. The scores on the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey showed an improvement in burning sensation and light sensitivity, decreasing from 80% and 70% to 50% for both.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuropathic corneal pain is a potential post-COVID-19 complication that warrants ophthalmologists' and neurologists' attention.

Preservative-Free Topical Anesthetic Unit-Dose Eye Drops for the Management of Postoperative Pain Following Photorefractive Keratectomy

INTRODUCTION

Ocular pain is a common complication following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). The level of patient satisfaction with current pain control strategies is not high. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel regimen of preservative-free oxybuprocaine hydrochloride 0.4% unit-dose eye drops for post-PRK pain control.

METHODS

In a contralateral eye study, 144 eyes of 72 patients who underwent bilateral transepithelial PRK (TransPRK) were stratified into experimental and control groups. The experimental group received preservative-free oxybuprocaine hydrochloride 0.4% unit-dose eye drops five times daily postoperatively until complete epithelial healing, while the control group received sodium hyaluronate 0.2% instead. The main outcome measures were pain scores assessed by the verbal rating scale and visual analogue scale (VRS, VAS), the corneal epithelial defect (CED) area, epithelial healing duration evaluated by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) measured before and 1 month after surgery.

RESULTS

Pain scores assessed by VRS and VAS were significantly lower in the experimental group 8 h after surgery, and 1, 2, and 3 days postoperatively (P < 0.001). The mean CED area showed no significant differences between the two groups at different follow-ups (P value > 0.05). The corneal epithelial healing had a mean duration of 3.32 ± 0.47 days in both studied groups and was parallel in both eyes of each patient. In each group, 49 eyes (68%) and 72 eyes (100%) had a fully epithelialized surface on the third and fourth postoperative days, respectively. No significant changes were observed in the mean ECD 1 month following surgery in both groups (P value > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preservative-free oxybuprocaine hydrochloride 0.4% unit-dose eye drops are effective and safe in controlling early postoperative pain following TransPRK. The availability of the single-dose unit preparation can overcome the problem of topical anesthetic abuse.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05733741.

Topical analgesics for acute corneal pain: current options and emerging therapeutics

Acute corneal pain is a common complaint that causes significant distress to patients and continues to challenge therapeutic avenues for pain management. Current topical treatment options have marked limitations in terms of both efficacy and safety, thus often prompting the adjunctive use of systemic analgesics, including opioids. In general, there have not been extensive advancements in pharmacologic options for the management of corneal pain over the past several decades. Despite this, multiple promising therapeutic avenues exist which hold the potential to transform the ocular pain landscape, including druggable targets within the endocannabinoid system. This review will summarize the current evidence base for topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anticholinergic agents, and anesthetics before focusing on several potential avenues in the setting of acute corneal pain management, including autologous tear serum, topical opioids and endocannabinoid system modulators.

Topical ophthalmic anesthetics for corneal abrasions

BACKGROUND

Despite potential analgesic benefits from topical ophthalmic amides and esters, their outpatient use has become of concern because of the potential for abuse and ophthalmic complications.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of topical ophthalmic anesthetics compared with placebo or other treatments in persons with corneal abrasions.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; Embase.com; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), without restriction on language or year of publication. The search was performed on 10 February 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of topical ophthalmic anesthetics alone or in combination with another treatment (e.g. nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)) versus a non-anesthetic control group (e.g. placebo, non-treatment, or alternative treatment). We included trials that enrolled participants of all ages who had corneal abrasions within 48 hours of presentation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine parallel-group RCTs with a total of 556 participants (median number of participants per study: 45, interquartile range (IQR) 44 to 74), conducted in eight countries: Australia, Canada, France, South Korea, Turkey, New Zealand, UK, and USA. Study characteristics and risk of bias Four RCTs (314 participants) investigated post-traumatic corneal abrasions diagnosed in the emergency department setting. Five trials described 242 participants from ophthalmology surgery centers with post-surgical corneal defects: four from photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and one from pterygium surgery. Study duration ranged from two days to six months, the most common being one week (four RCTs). Treatment duration ranged from three hours to one week (nine RCTs); the majority were between 24 and 48 hours (five RCTs). The age of participants was reported in eight studies, ranging from 17 to 74 years of age. Only one participant in one trial was under 18 years of age. Of four studies that reported funding sources, none was industry-sponsored. We judged a high risk of bias in one trial with respect to the outcome pain control by 48 hours, and in five of seven trials with respect to the outcome complications at the furthest time point. The domain for which we assessed studies to be at the highest risk of bias was missing or selective reporting of outcome data. Findings The treatments investigated included topical anesthetics compared with placebo, topical anesthetic compared with NSAID (post-surgical cases), and topical anesthetics plus NSAID compared with placebo (post-surgical cases). Pain control by 24 hours In all studies, self-reported pain outcomes were on a 10-point scale, where lower numbers represent less pain. In post-surgical trials, topical anesthetics provided a moderate reduction in self-reported pain at 24 hours compared with placebo of 1.28 points on a 10-point scale (mean difference (MD) -1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.76 to -0.80; 3 RCTs, 119 participants). In the post-trauma participants, there may be little or no difference in effect (MD -0.04, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.02; 1 RCT, 76 participants). Compared with NSAID in post-surgical participants, topical anesthetics resulted in a slight increase in pain at 24 hours (MD 0.82, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.63; 1 RCT, 74 participants). One RCT compared topical anesthetics plus NSAID to placebo. There may be a large reduction in pain at 24 hours with topical anesthetics plus NSAID in post-surgical participants, but the evidence to support this large effect is very uncertain (MD -5.72, 95% CI -7.35 to -4.09; 1 RCT, 30 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Pain control by 48 hours Compared with placebo, topical anesthetics reduced post-trauma pain substantially by 48 hours (MD -5.68, 95% CI -6.38 to -4.98; 1 RCT, 111 participants) but had little to no effect on post-surgical pain (MD 0.41, 95% CI -0.45 to 1.27; 1 RCT, 44 participants), although the evidence is very uncertain. Pain control by 72 hours One post-surgical RCT showed little or no effect of topical anesthetics compared with placebo by 72 hours (MD 0.49, 95% CI -0.06 to 1.04; 44 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Proportion of participants with unresolved epithelial defects When compared with placebo or NSAID, topical anesthetics increased the number of participants without complete resolution of defects in trials of post-trauma participants (risk ratio (RR) 1.37, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.42; 3 RCTs, 221 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The proportion of placebo-treated post-surgical participants with unresolved epithelial defects at 24 to 72 hours was lower when compared with those assigned to topical anesthetics (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.55; 1 RCT, 30 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or topical anesthetics plus NSAID (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.85; 1 RCT, 30 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Proportion of participants with complications at the longest follow-up When compared with placebo or NSAID, topical anesthetics resulted in a higher proportion of post-trauma participants with complications at up to two weeks (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.23 to 5.46; 3 RCTs, 242 participants) and post-surgical participants with complications at up to one week (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.38 to 128.02; 1 RCT, 44 participants). When topical anesthetic plus NSAID was compared with placebo, no complications were reported in either treatment arm up to one week post-surgery (risk difference (RD) 0.00, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.12; 1 RCT, 30 participants). The evidence is very uncertain for safety outcomes. Quality of life None of the included trials assessed quality of life outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite topical anesthetics providing excellent pain control in the intraoperative setting, the currently available evidence provides little or no certainty about their efficacy for reducing ocular pain in the initial 24 to 72 hours after a corneal abrasion, whether from unintentional trauma or surgery. We have very low confidence in this evidence as a basis to recommend topical anesthetics as an efficacious treatment modality to relieve pain from corneal abrasions. We also found no evidence of a substantial effect on epithelial healing up to 72 hours or a reduction in ocular complications when we compared anesthetics alone or with NSAIDs versus placebo.

Cold bandage contact lens use reduces post-photorefractive keratectomy or corneal collagen-crosslinking pain perception in patients

Purpose

To compare post-operative pain perception using bandage contact lens (BCL) stored at 2-8°C (Cold BCL, CL-BCL) or room temperature (23 - 25°C, RT-BCL) after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or corneal collagen-crosslinking (CXL) and determine status of nociception associated factors.

Methods

In this prospective interventional study, 56 patients undergoing PRK for refractive correction and 100 keratoconus (KC) undergoing CXL were recruited following approval from the institutional ethics committee with informed consent. Patients undergoing bilateral PRK received RT-BCL on one eye and CL-BCL on the other. Pain was graded by Wong-Baker scoring on the first post-operative day (PoD1). Expression of transient receptor potential channels (TRPV1, TRPA1, TRPM8), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and IL-6 was measured in cellular content from used BCLs collected on PoD1. Equal number of KC patients received RT-BCL or CL-BCL post-CXL. Pain was graded by Wong-Baker scoring on PoD1.

Results

Pain scores on PoD1 were significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced in subjects receiving CL-BCL (Mean ± SD: 2.6 ± 2.1) compared to RT-BCL (6.0 ± 2.4) post-PRK. 80.4% of subjects reported reduced pain scores with CL-BCL. 19.6% reported no change or increased pain scores with CL-BCL. TRPM8 expression was significantly (P < 0.05) increased in BCL of subjects reporting reduced pain with CL-BCL compared to those who did not. Pain scores on PoD1 were significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced in subjects receiving CL-BCL (3.2 ± 2.1) compared to RT-BCL (7.2 ± 1.8) post-CXL.

Conclusion

The simple approach of using a cold BCL post-operatively substantially reduced pain perception and could overcome post-operative pain-related limited acceptance of PRK/CXL.

Two-year stability of posterior corneal surface after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy with a residual stromal thickness less than 350 μm

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the stability of posterior corneal surface 2 years after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK) in patients with a residual stromal thickness less than 350 μm.

METHODS

In total, 408 eyes of 212 patients (160 women, 52 men) who underwent TPRK were enrolled in this retrospective study. All surgeries were performed in the Amaris 750S excimer laser platform with smart pulse technology. The posterior corneal elevation, anterior chamber depth, Q value, and curvature were measured using Pentacam preoperatively and postoperatively. All patients were followed up for 2 years. The relationship between percent tissue altered (PTA), age, and changes in posterior corneal surface was analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was - 6.80 ± 1.18 D (range: - 9.00 to - 2.63 D). The mean residual stromal thickness was 336.46 ± 7.25 μm (range: 310-348 μm). The mean PTA was 30.93 ± 2.03% (range: 24.29-35.28%). At 2 years after surgery, the elevation of six points in the central area decreased by 1.91 ± 2.97 μm, 2.98 ± 3.23 μm, 1.17 ± 3.85 μm, 1.70 ± 2.88 μm, 1.36 ± 3.19 μm, and 1.65 ± 3.18 μm, compared with the preoperative value (P < 0.05). The elevation of three points in the peripheral area increased by 1.87 ± 6.34 μm, 0.68 ± 6.00 μm, and 0.95 ± 5.50 μm (P < 0.05). There was no significant linear relationship between PTA, age, and changes in posterior corneal surface, anterior chamber depth, and K2 (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Within 2 years after TPRK, the posterior corneal surface remained stable in patients with a residual stromal thickness between 310 and 350 μm. There was no sign of iatrogenic ectasia during the follow-up period.

Topical Ocular TRPV1 Antagonist SAF312 (Libvatrep) for Postoperative Pain After Photorefractive Keratectomy

Purpose

Evaluation of safety and efficacy of topical ocular SAF312 (Libvatrep) in post-photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) pain.

Methods

In this placebo (vehicle)-controlled, participant- and investigator-masked study, 40 participants were randomized (1:1) to two treatment sequences in a bilateral PRK crossover design (SAF312 2.5% followed by vehicle [or vice versa], one eye drop, four times daily for 72 hours after PRK). Primary endpoints were visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 6 hours after first drop of study drug and average VAS scores over 0 to 12 hours postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included postoperative oral rescue medication (ORM) use and adverse events (AEs).

Results

All 40 participants completed the study. Both primary endpoints were met; mean difference in VAS pain scores between SAF312- and vehicle-treated eyes was -11.13 (P = 0.005, -25%) at 6 hours postoperatively and -8.56 (P = 0.017, -22%) over 0 to 12 hours. Mean VAS pain scores with SAF312 were consistently lower than with vehicle from 1 hour postoperatively up to 30 hours (P ≤ 0.10 observed in 8/11 time points). Less ORM was taken with SAF312 up to 0 to 72 hours postoperatively, with a trend of fewer participants taking ORM at 0 to 24 hours postoperatively with SAF312 versus vehicle. No serious AEs were reported. All ocular AEs were mild and transient, and none were drug related. SAF312-treated eyes showed no delay in wound healing and had a lower grade 4 conjunctival hyperemia 24 hours postoperatively versus vehicle-treated eyes.

Conclusions

SAF312 was well tolerated and effective in reducing ocular pain post-PRK.

Translational Relevance

Topical SAF312 presents a new therapeutic option for patients undergoing PRK.

A New Postoperative Regimen after CXL and PRK Using Topical NSAID and Steroids on the Open Ocular Surface

Corneal epithelium removal during photorefractive keratotomy (PRK), TransPRK, or corneal cross-linking (CXL) means that patients experience pain and inflammation after the procedure, which need to be carefully managed with topical drug regimens. One highly effective class of topical analgesics is non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but these must be used carefully, as their use has been associated with delayed re-epithelialization and, in rare cases, corneal melting. However, our clinical experience has been that the concomitant use of topical corticosteroids obviates this risk. Here, we present a mechanistic explanation for our observations, our TransPRK and epithelium-off CXL protocols, and the postoperative medication regimens where topical NSAIDs are used in combination with topical steroid therapy during the first two postoperative days (where pain and inflammation levels are the highest). We detail the results of a single-center retrospective case analysis that examined eyes that underwent TransPRK (n = 301) or epithelium-off CXL (n = 576). Topical NSAID use in the first two postoperative days to control pain and inflammation after PRK/TransPRK or epithelium-off CXL, when used in combination with topical steroid therapy, does not appear to be associated with corneal melting or delayed epithelial healing. This approach may represent an improvement over current methods of handling post-surgical pain in procedures that require corneal epithelial debridement.

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Manage Postoperative Ocular Pain after Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft Transplantation with a Single Application of 2% Sodium Hyaluronate

Purpose

To assess the effectiveness of a single application of 2% sodium hyaluronate (SH) in controlling pain after pterygium excision as compared with that of a control group.

Methods

We performed a prospective randomized controlled trial in the patients who underwent pterygium excision. The outcome of topical application of 2.0% SH was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS), in comparison with that observed in a control group (without SH). The area of ocular surface defects was assessed by ImageJ freeware. Analysis of pain scores and ocular surface defects were observed from both groups immediately after the operation, Day 0, and 3 subsequent days.

Results

Thirty patients were randomly divided into control group and SH treatment group. The initial area of the ocular surface defect on Day 0 was approximately the same for both groups (p=0.242). The medians of pain score assessed by the VAS on Days 0, 1, and 2 were 5, 3, and 0 for the SH group and 6, 5, and 3 for the control group, respectively. The pain score was statistically significantly decreased in the SH group compared to the control group on Day 1 (p < 0.001) and Day 2 (p < 0.001). The pain level of both groups was nearly the same on Day 3 (p=0.141). The area of ocular surface defects was significantly different between two groups on Day 1 (p < 0.001) and Day 2 (p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were not observed.

Conclusion

A single topical application of 2% SH in pterygium excision was effective in relieving pain in the early postoperative period without any adverse effects. This innovation may provide alternative pain control in pterygium surgery.

Preoperative Predictors for Acute Pain After Photorefractive Keratectomy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify preoperative predictors for the occurrence of early severe postoperative pain in patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). The implementation of preoperative screening methods may facilitate more specific or aggressive pain therapies specifically targeted to individuals at a high risk of experiencing severe postoperative pain.

METHODS

This was exploratory research that included patients who underwent PRK. Before PRK, patients were administered a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and underwent corneal sensitivity and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) tests. Post-PRK pain was assessed using a pain intensity visual analog scale (VAS), and the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) was completed 21 days before PRK and 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours after PRK. Spearman correlations were calculated for pain scores and preoperative predictors.

RESULTS

This research included 34 eyes of 34 patients. Preoperative corneal sensitivity was positively correlated with post-PRK pain scores as assessed by VAS and SF-MPQ (rho = 0.39 and rho = 0.41, respectively, P < 0.05). No correlations were found between Pain Catastrophizing Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and CPM scores and post-PRK pain scores (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal presurgical corneal sensitivity was a protective marker for severe pain after PRK, while scores as assessed by VAS and SF-MPQ and CPM were not related to postoperative pain.

Efficacy of Diclofenac in Pain Reduction after Topography-Guided Transepithelial Surface Ablation

PURPOSE

To report the efficacy of postoperative diclofenac eye drops for pain reduction in patients undergoing topography-guided transepithelial surface ablation.

METHODS

Retrospective consecutive case series of patients undergoing topography-guided transepithelial surface ablation for refractive myopia treatment using a 1 KHz excimer laser. Patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 did not receive any diclofenac drops, group 2 received one diclofenac drop postoperatively (day 1), and group 3 received one drop of diclofenac postoperatively (day 1) and on the day after treatment (day 2). Postoperative pain was self-assessed by patients per eye daily for the first 4 consecutive days (days 1 to 4) after the treatment using the visual analogue scale (VAS). We compared VAS with respect to the use of additional oral or topical treatment as well as VAS with regards to the total amount of ablated tissue (< 50 µm, 50 - 100 µm, ≥ 100 µm) among the groups.

RESULTS

We enrolled 163 eyes of 163 patients (55.0% female), with a mean age of 31.3 years (SD ± 6.6; range 21 - 68). We excluded 16 patients who applied other additional analgesics. Group 1 comprised 35 eyes (21%), group 2 had 21 eyes (13%), and group 3 consisted of 107 eyes (66%). Median pain score (VAS) was 5 (range 0, 10) in group 1, which was higher than in groups 2 (median 1, range 0 to 7) and 3 (median 1.5, range 0 to 7) on the day of surgery (p < 0.0001). Percentage of patients using an additional oral NSAID on days 1 and 2 was significantly higher in group 1 (69/83%) when compared to groups 2 (24/43%) or 3 (31/49%) (p < 0.001 day 1, p = 0.001 day 2). No correlation was found between pain sensation and maximum ablation depth (Spearman correlation p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The instillation of one drop of diclofenac after topography-guided transepithelial surface ablation reduced subjective pain sensation according to VAS and decreased the need for additional topical anesthetic drops or oral NSAID.

Effects of Regular/Dilute Proparacaine Anesthetic Eye Drops in Combination with Ophthalmic Antibiotics on Corneal Wound Healing

Purpose: Topical, local anesthetic eye drops in conjunction with antibiotics are commonly used to reduce ocular pain and treat patients in emergency clinics; however, their effects on corneal healing are poorly understood. This study examined whether regular or diluted proparacaine eye drops given in combination with common ophthalmic antibiotics affect corneal wound healing parameters using in vitro and in vivo models. Methods: Primary human corneal fibroblasts generated from donor corneas and New Zealand white rabbits were used. Regular (0.5%) and diluted (0.05%) proparacaine eye drops, twice daily for 3 days, were applied to cultures and rabbit eyes, with or without ophthalmic antibiotics (polymyxin B sulfate and trimethoprim). Trypan blue, 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), and scratch wound assays measured cellular viability, proliferation, and migration, respectively, in vitro. Slit lamp biomicroscopy, tonometry, fluorescein eye test, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) immunofluorescence were used for in vivo studies. Results: Both regular and diluted proparacaine affected wound healing response in the cornea in vitro and in vivo in a time-dependent manner. Adjunct antibiotic treatments had additive effects characterized by reduced corneal fibroblast viability, proliferation, and migration in vitro and corneal epithelial recovery in vivo. Regular proparacaine with antibiotics showed most pronounced effects on corneal wound healing parameters, and diluted proparacaine without antibiotics had minimal negative effects in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: Both methods of regular (0.5%) and diluted (0.05%) proparacaine topical application to the cornea are safe, but impede corneal wound healing in vitro and in vivo. Adjunct antibiotic treatments had additive negative effects on corneal wound repair.

The use of topical nalbuphine in different concentrations to control pain after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

This is a randomized controlled study aiming to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two different concentrations of topical nalbuphine hydrochloride, when used to relieve pain in the first days following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

This is a prospective double blinded randomized clinical trial that included 189 patients who had PRK for correction of low and moderate refractive errors. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups according to the eye drops given to relieve pain in the first three postoperative days; the first group received topical nalbuphine with a concentration of 2 mg/ml (Group A = 64 patients), the second group received topical nalbuphine in a concentration of 1 mg/ml (Group B = 69 patients) and the third group received topical artificial tears only (Group C = 56 patients).The patients were asked to rate their pain daily using a numeric rating scale and to record the number of drops instillation times/day. The time needed for complete epithelial healing, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and spherical equivalent after three months were recorded in each group.

RESULTS

In the first three days, there was a statistically significant difference in pain score among the three groups with lower values in the two topical nalbuphine groups when compared with the control group receiving artificial tears. Moreover, the higher concentration group showed significantly lower pain score and less number of drops used /day in comparison with the lower concentration group.There were no statistically significant differences in epithelial healing time, BCVA and spherical equivalent after three months among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of topical nalbuphine is effective in relieving pain in the first few days following PRK and this pain relief is not associated with any compromise regarding epithelial healing nor refractive outcome. The pain control with 2 mg/ml concentration is significantly higher than that with 1 mg/ml concentration of nalbuphine. Trial registration numberISRCTN21394752 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN21394752 The trial is retrospectively registered in ISRCTN registry at March 08, 2021.

Delayed Epithelial Healing with Corneal Edema and Haze After Photorefractive Keratectomy Using Intraoperative Mitomycin C

We report an unusual presentation of presumed mitomycin C toxicity with possible subsequent hypersensitization to other medication toxicities. A 50-year-old female presented three months after photorefractive keratectomy with intraoperative mitomycin C for the management of persistent epithelial defects, corneal haze, and edema. She was found to have used an expansive and rapidly changing medical regimen which may have caused additional toxicity. These medications included besifloxacin, bromfenac, and ketotifen. Additives such as benzalkonium chloride and DuraSite^® may have also contributed. Intraoperative mitomycin C can result in longstanding corneal haze, edema, and delayed epithelial healing in the setting of corneal refractive surgery. These may leave the cornea more susceptible to additional subsequent medication toxicities during the postoperative period. This report describes a case of mitomycin C exposure leading to a prolonged sensitivity to other medication toxicities, which has not been discussed elsewhere in the literature.

Update on Pain Management After Advanced Surface Ablation

PURPOSE

To provide an update for postoperative pain control strategies to help ophthalmic surgeons establish a more effective management plan for patients who underwent advanced surface ablation surgeries.

METHODS

Google Scholar, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and PubMed were the main resources used to search the medical literature.

RESULTS

The postoperative cornea's healing process is accompanied by intense pain as the chief complaint in the first days after the operation. Several strategies were developed to relieve postoperative pain after surface ablation procedures. These strategies included different preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative methods. Considering the preoperative demographic and emotional factors, underlying dry eye, alternative epithelial removal techniques, bandage contact lenses, and topical or oral therapeutic agents are some examples of postoperative pain treatments after surface ablation procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The current review revealed that despite the development of numerous protocols to relieve postoperative pain following surface ablations, the best approach could be a combination of different strategies. In practice, no validated and standardized strategy is available for total elimination of postoperative pain following advanced surface ablation surgeries. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(11):782-790.].

Role of artificial tears with and without hyaluronic acid in controlling ocular discomfort following PRK: a randomized clinical trial

AIM

To compare outcomes of applying preservative free artificial tears (PFAT) with and without hyaluronic acid (HA) in early postoperative course following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

In this triple-blinded randomized clinical trial, PRK procedure was performed on both eyes of 230 patients. Following PRK, patients were divided into three groups: the HA⁺ group, 44 patients PFAT containing HA; the HA^- group, 71 patients PFAT without HA were administered 5 times per day (every 4h); the third group, 115 patients received no PFAT before lens removal. On the 1^st and 4^th postoperative day, Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was utilized to evaluate patient's level of pain. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire about the severity of eye discomfort ranked from 0 to 10 (0=no complaint; 10=most severe complaint experienced).

RESULTS

In eyes receiving PFAT with or without HA (Drop group), mean scores for epiphora, foreign body sensation, and blurred vision on the 1^st postoperative day were statistically lower (P<0.05). Filamentous keratitis (FK) was detected in 11 (4.7%) eyes, and recurrent corneal erosion (RCE) was observed in 5 (2.1%) eyes. In the control group, FK was noted in 16 (6.9%) eyes while 13 (5.6%) eyes had RCE and 5 (2.1%) eyes had corneal haze. The rate of complications was statistically lower in Drop group (P=0.009). However, the aforementioned scores were not statically different between HA⁺ and HA^- group one and two (P=0.29).

CONCLUSION

Following PRK, applying PFAT with and without HA yields faster visual recovery, decreases postoperative ocular discomfort and haze formation; however there is no additive effect for HA.

Opioids and ophthalmology: review of the current literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The number of opioid-related overdose deaths has rapidly increased since 2000, increasing more than five-fold from 1999 to 2016. Although surgeons only write 10% of opioid prescriptions annually, with ophthalmologists writing only a fraction of this amount, all physicians need to be cognizant of the current opioid epidemic and ways to decrease unnecessary opioid prescriptions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Previous work within ophthalmology has shown that retrobulbar anesthesia along with peri-operative intravenous or oral nonopioid analgesics can lead to decreased postoperative opioid use following ophthalmic surgery. Recent literature has shifted focus towards the use of opioid prescription guidelines in managing postoperative pain and decreasing the number of unnecessary opioids being prescribed by ophthalmologists. Overall, the frequency of opioid prescriptions may have gradually declined the past few years with such efforts, increased awareness, and new healthcare policies to monitor opioid prescriptions. However, ophthalmologists still continue to prescribe a substantial number of opioid medications, much of which may not be necessary.

SUMMARY

This review serves as a tool to aid all ophthalmologists in managing postoperative pain. There is a recent trend in addressing the opioid epidemic and efforts are being made to limit the overprescribing of opioids. Continued efforts are still required by all ophthalmologists to address the current opioid epidemic.

[Refractive surgery for hyperopia]

Hyperopia is a refractive error in which light is focused behind, instead of on, the retina. Clear vision can be obtained by accommodation, but in the long run, this results in eye strain. Hyperopia can be classified as low [≤2.00 diopters (D)], moderate (2.00-4.00 D) and high (>4.00 D). Detailed preoperative evaluation is necessary and essential to obtain good postoperative results. Various surgical techniques can be proposed to correct this ametropia. The main techniques used act either by modifying the corneal curvature with the Excimer laser or by implanting a phakic intraocular lens. The anatomical peculiarities of the hyperopic eye (small corneal diameter, short axial length, narrow anterior chamber or large kappa angle) make refractive surgery for hyperopia a considerable challenge. Large optical ablation zones now allow correction of high hyperopia by reducing the risks of optical aberrations and regression. The patient must be informed and understand the postoperative course, which differs from that of surgery for myopia.

Cool Crosslinking: Riboflavin at 4°C for Pain Management After Crosslinking for Keratoconus Patients, A Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

To explore corneal cooling as a method of pain management in corneal-accelerated collagen cross-linking.

METHODS

This was a prospective and interventional randomized clinical trial registered in the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials through the identifier NCT030760770. The research was conducted at the Institute of Ophthalmology "Conde de Valenciana." A total of 98 patients were randomly assigned to one of the following 2 groups: cold riboflavin (4°C) group or control group (riboflavin at room temperature). The inclusion criteria were patients of any sex, older than 18 years of age with keratoconus diagnosis who needed management with cross-linking in both eyes because of the evidence of progression. The exclusion criteria were patients who had cross-linking without epithelial debridement, unilateral cross-linking, or any other ocular pathologies besides keratoconus and any cognitive incapacity that would make the understanding of the pain test difficult. The main outcome measures were pain, tearing, photophobia, foreign body sensation, and irritation.

RESULTS

At 2 hours post-op, pain in the case and control groups was 3.80 ± 3.00 and 8.08 ± 2.21 (P < 0.05), tearing was 1.56 ± 1.96 and 8.29 ± 2.42 (P < 0.05), photophobia was 5.44 ± 3.57 and 7.83 ± 2.64 (P < 0.05), foreign body sensation was 2.20 ± 2.78 and 6.54 ± 2.73 (P < 0.05), and irritation was 3.48 ± 2.98 and 6.79 ± 3.00 (P < 0.05), respectively. A statistical significant difference was maintained in pain values on day 1 (2.79 ± 3.09 and 4.91 ± 3.27 [P < 0.05]), 2 (2.54 ± 2.41 and 4.00 ± 2.43 [P < 0.05]), and 4 (0.45 ± 0.76 and 1.22 ± 1.67 [P < 0.05]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that pain and associated symptoms decreased significantly in the riboflavin 4°C group.

Survey of Postoperative Pain in Photorefractive Keratectomy Using Topical versus Oral Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

Purpose

To evaluate and compare postoperative pain following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in patients using a preventive regimen of oral versus topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Patients and Methods

A prospective, randomized, longitudinal survey of postoperative PRK pain was performed on 157 subjects in a tertiary academic medical center setting. Patients were randomized to either topical ketorolac 0.4% every 12 hours or oral naproxen sodium 220 mg every 12 hours for 72 hours following PRK, beginning at the time of surgery. The primary outcome measure was the daily peak pain score from the validated numerical rating scale (NRS) for five days after surgery.

Results

The peak pain scores were significantly higher in the oral NSAID group (mean 5.82, SD 1.94) compared to the topical NSAID group (mean 4.2, SD 2.19) (p<0.0001) after PRK. When comparing each postoperative day after PRK, the pain scores from 24 to 48 hours (day 2) were significantly higher in the oral NSAID group (mean 5.17, SD 2.25) as compared to the topical NSAID group (mean 3.21, SD 2.09) (p<0.0001). Pain scores 24–72 hours after surgery (days 2 and 3) were higher than pain scores on days 1, 4, and 5 for both groups.

Conclusion

Twice daily oral naproxen sodium 220 mg is inferior to twice daily topical ketorolac 0.4% in the treatment of early postoperative pain after PRK. This study also identified a consistent trend in which pain scores were highest 24–72 hours after the procedure. This additional observation may be useful in understanding, preventing, and treating post-PRK pain.

Visual outcomes after SMILE from the first-year experience at a U.S. military refractive surgery center and comparison with PRK and LASIK outcomes

PURPOSE

To assess the visual outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) after the first year of treatments at a military refractive surgery center and compare with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) outcomes during the same period.

SETTING

Warfighter Refractive Eye Surgery Program and Research Center, Fort Belvoir, VA.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

Records of service members who underwent SMILE, PRK, or LASIK for myopia from March 2017 to February 2018 were reviewed. Preoperative and up to 6-month postoperative data were collected. Visual outcomes were compared between treatments.

RESULTS

Of 563 treated eyes, 173 (30.7%) underwent SMILE, 304 (54.0%) PRK, and 86 (15.3%) LASIK. In comparing SMILE with PRK 1 month postoperatively, SMILE (145 eyes [87.9%]) attained uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) ≥20/20 more vs PRK (214 eyes [73.8%]; P < .01). Similarly, SMILE (152 eyes [94.4%]) achieved more eyes with manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) within ±0.50 diopters (D) from intended target vs PRK (250 eyes [85.9%]; P = .01). None lost ≥1 line of corrected distance visual acuity in SMILE vs PRK (16 eyes [5.5%]; P < .01). Thereafter, there were no other significant differences except SMILE had 117 eyes (95.1%) vs PRK with 224 eyes (99.6%) achieving UDVA ≥20/20 at 3 months postoperatively (P = .01). In assessing SMILE vs LASIK, all parameters were comparable; however, 77 SMILE eyes (96.3%) had MSE within ±0.50 D from target vs 31 LASIK eyes (83.8%) at 6 months postoperatively (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The first year after SMILE treatments in a U.S. military center demonstrated early postoperative outcomes superior to PRK. SMILE seemed more predictable compared with LASIK.

Pregabalin Failed to Prevent Dry Eye Symptoms after Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) in a Randomized Pilot Study

PURPOSE

Perioperative pregabalin administration has been found to reduce the risk of persistent pain after a variety of surgical procedures. However, this approach has not been tested in relation to eye surgery. As such, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether perioperative pregabalin can reduce the presence of dry eye (DE) symptoms, including eye pain, six months after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

METHODS

Prospective, masked, randomized single-center pilot study. Patients were treated with either pregabalin (oral solution of pregabalin 150 mg twice daily, first dose prior to surgery, continued for a total of 28 doses over 14 days) or placebo solution. The primary outcome was dry eye symptoms as measured by the Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 (DEQ-5). Secondary outcome measures included pain-related eye symptoms.

RESULTS

In total, 43 individuals were enrolled in the study and randomized to pregabalin (n = 21) or placebo (n = 22). Of those, 42 individuals completed the final visit after six months of follow-up. Some differences were noted between the two groups at baseline, including a higher frequency of females in the pregabalin group. At 6-months, there were no significant differences in the percentage of patients with DE symptoms (DEQ5 ≥ 6, 57% vs. 33%, p = 0.14), DE symptom severity (DEQ5, 6.6 ± 5.0 vs. 4.5 ± 4.2, p = 0.14), ocular pain intensity (numerical rating scale, 1.10 ± 1.48 vs. 0.38 ± 0.97, p = 0.08), or neuropathic pain complaints (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory-Eye, 2.81 ± 4.07 vs. 3.14 ± 5.85, p = 0.83) between the pregabalin and control groups. Ocular signs were likewise similar between the groups, and of note, did not correlate with DE symptoms. The strongest predictor of DE symptoms six months post-surgery was the presence of DE symptoms prior to surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative pregabalin did not reduce the frequency or severity of DE symptoms at a six month follow-up after LASIK in this small pilot study.