Omental Biopsy for Surgical Staging of Uterine Serous Carcinoma

Incidence of omental metastasis in uterine serous carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies examining the incidence of omental metastasis in uterine serous carcinoma generally suffered from the small sample size, retrospective observational design, and single-center setting. So far, there was no systematic review and meta-analysis available on this topic, we conducted this study to quantitatively synthesize the data relating to this topic.

DESIGN

systematic review and meta-analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched up until August 15, 2020. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. I² was employed to assess the heterogeneity among included studies. Effect sizes along with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to analyze outcomes of interest. Funnel plots and the Egger test were used to detect the possibility of publication bias.

OUTCOME MEASURES

incidence of omental metastasis in uterine serous carcinoma.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies involving 1012 women with uterine serous carcinoma were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. All the included studies were at low risk of bias, and the heterogeneity among them was low. The pooled incidence of overall omental metastasis, occult omental metastasis, and gross omental metastasis in uterine serous carcinoma were 18% (95% CI, 0.15-0.20), 6% (95% CI, 0.04-0.08), and 10% (95% CI, 0.08-0.13), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Uterine serous carcinoma has a high tendency of omental metastasis. The main form of omentum involvement is gross metastasis. However, occult metastasis in the normal-looking omentum is also worthy of note.

Is omentectomy necessary in the treatment of benign or malignant abdominal pathologies? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The omentum is an organ that is easily sacrificed during abdominal surgery. The scope of omentectomy and whether a routine omentectomy should be performed are still unknown.

AIM

To review the literature in order to determine the physiological functions of the omentum and the roles it plays in pathological events in order to reveal the necessity for removal and preservation of the omentum.

METHODS

A clinical review of the English language literature based on the MEDLINE (PubMed) database was conducted using the keywords: “abdomen”, “gastrointestinal”, “tumor”, “inflammation”, “omental flap”, “metastasis”, “omentum”, and “omentectomy”. In addition, reports were also identified by systematically reviewing all references in retrieved papers.

RESULTS

The omentum functions as a natural barrier in areas where pathological processes occur in the abdominal cavity. The omentum limits and controls inflammatory and infectious pathologies that occur in the abdomen. It also aids in treatment due to its cellular functions including lymphatic drainage and phagocytosis. It shows similar behavior in tumors, but it cannot cope with increasing tumor burden. The stage of the disease changes due to the tumor mass it tries to control. Therefore, it is considered an indicator of poor prognosis. Due to this feature, the omentum is one of the first organs to be sacrificed during surgical procedures. However, there are many unknowns regarding the role and efficacy of the omentum in cancer.

CONCLUSION

The omentum is a unique organ that limits and controls inflammatory processes, foreign masses, and lesions that develop in the abdominal cavity. Omental flaps can be used in all anatomical areas, including the thorax, abdomen, pelvis, and extremities. The omentum is an organ that deserves the title of the abdominal policeman. It is generally accepted that the omentum should be removed in cases where there is tumor invasion. However, the positive or negative contribution of omental resection in the treatment of abdominal pathologies should be questioned.

Controversies in the Management of Early-stage Serous Endometrial Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Early-stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC) has one of the highest recurrence rates and mortality among early-stage uterine epithelial cancers. Research into the clinical management of USC has begun to progress, guided by surgical and pathological advances. This article summarizes the available literature regarding diagnosis, management, and possible future uses of molecular analysis of women with early-stage USC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed was searched for all pertinent English language research articles published from January 1, 2006 through March 1, 2020 which included a study population of women diagnosed with stage 1 USC. Due to the scarcity of prospective or large-scale data, studies were not limited by design or numbers of patients. Studies performed at earlier dates were incorporated to provide context.

RESULTS

A total of 86 studies were included in the review. Multiple well-designed studies have confirmed the safety of a minimally invasive surgical approach for surgical management of USC. The role of sentinel node biopsy has been validated with both prospective and retrospective multi-center data. Stage I USC is associated with a highly variable risk of recurrence, even following completion of adjuvant chemoradiation. This aggressive phenotype has been linked to high numbers of somatic copy number alterations, tumor protein 53, and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase mutations, which have been shown to be predictive of prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Early-stage USC demonstrates a lack of predictable recurrence patterns, with reports noting distant recurrence in patients with disease confined to polyps. Unless no residual tumor is found on hysterectomy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be discussed and individualized by stage and treatment goals.

Clinicopathologic and Genomic Analysis of TP53-Mutated Endometrial Carcinomas

PURPOSE

Copy number-high endometrial carcinomas were described by The Cancer Genome Atlas as high-grade endometrioid and serous cancers showing frequent copy-number alterations (CNA), low mutational burden (i.e., non-hypermutant), near-universal TP53 mutation, and unfavorable clinical outcomes. We sought to investigate and compare the clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of non-hypermutant TP53-altered endometrial carcinomas of four histologic types.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

TP53-mutated endometrial carcinomas, defined as TP53-mutant tumors lacking microsatellite instability or pathogenic POLE mutations, were identified (n = 238) in a cohort of 1,239 endometrial carcinomas subjected to clinical massively parallel sequencing of 410-468 cancer-related genes. Somatic mutations and CNAs (n = 238), and clinicopathologic features were determined (n = 185, initial treatment planning at our institution).

RESULTS

TP53-mutated endometrial carcinomas encompassed uterine serous (n = 102, 55.1%), high-grade endometrial carcinoma with ambiguous features/not otherwise specified (EC-NOS; n = 44, 23.8%), endometrioid carcinomas of all tumor grades (n = 28, 15.1%), and clear cell carcinomas (n = 11, 5.9%). PTEN mutations were significantly more frequent in endometrioid carcinomas, SPOP mutations in clear cell carcinomas, and CCNE1 amplification in serous carcinomas/EC-NOS; however, none of these genomic alterations were exclusive to any given histologic type. ERBB2 amplification was present at similar frequencies across TP53-mutated histologic types (7.7%-18.6%). Although overall survival was similar across histologic types, serous carcinomas presented more frequently at stage IV, had more persistent and/or recurrent disease, and reduced disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

TP53-mutated endometrial carcinomas display clinical and molecular similarities across histologic subtypes. Our data provide evidence to suggest performance of ERBB2 assessment in all TP53-mutated endometrial carcinomas. Given the distinct clinical features of serous carcinomas, histologic classification continues to be relevant.

Incidence of omental metastasis in uterine serous carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Uterine serous carcinoma accounts for only about 10% of all endometrial cancers but this subtype is the most common amongst non-endometrioid endometrium cancers and contributes to more than half of recurrence and deaths attributed to endometrial cancers. A more extensive surgical staging and adjuvant therapies for uterine serous carcinoma are recommended by many guidelines. However, guidelines vary on recommendations for the methods that should be used for omentum assessment in uterine serous carcinoma and the previously reported incidence of omental metastasis in uterine serous carcinoma had a wide range because of the heterogeneity among these studies. As far as we know, there are no systematic review and meta-analysis available on this topic. The aim of our proposed study is to statistically synthesise the data examining the incidence of omental metastasis in uterine serous carcinoma.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Systematic searches of three databases (PubMed, Embase and Web of Science) will be performed using prespecified search strategies. We will include original studies that reported incidence of omental metastasis in uterine serous carcinoma and are published before 30 August 2020. Our different investigators will independently conduct the eligible study selection, assess the quality of included studies and extract the needed data. If appropriate, the relevant data will be pooled through a random-effect or fixed-effect meta-analysis based on the heterogeneity among included studies. We will evaluate the overall quality of evidence using appropriate methods.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This proposed study will be based on published data, and thus, there is no requirement for ethics approval. We aim to publish the results of this study in a peer-reviewed journal with good visibility for the fields of gynaecology and gynecologic oncology.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020200891.

The role of omentectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine serous carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to assess the role of omentectomy in the staging of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and to evaluate its impact on patient outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients diagnosed with USC at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University of China were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival data of 187 patients were analyzed. Risk factors for omental metastasis were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare survival status and the presence of omental metastasis.

RESULTS

We found that 35 of 187 patients (18.7%) had omental metastases. Omental metastasis was significantly associated with adnexal involvement (40.0% vs 19.1%, P = 0.008, OR 2.828, 95% CI 1.286-6.218). Multivariate analysis showed that in addition to lymph node metastases and suboptimal surgery, omental metastasis in USC remained an independent predictor of decreased PFS and OS (PFS, HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14-4.63, P = 0.024; OS, HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-3.60, P = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of omental metastasis is not low in patients with USC. Visual assessment and omental biopsy may be insufficient for recognizing occult metastases. Omentectomy should be part of the staging surgery in USC patients because it provides additional information about survival. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

[Primary management of endometrial carcinoma. Joint recommendations of the French society of gynecologic oncology (SFOG) and of the French college of obstetricians and gynecologists (CNGOF)]

OBJECTIVES

The management of endometrial carcinoma is constantly evolving. The SFOG and the CNGOF decided to jointly update the previous French recommendations (Institut national du cancer 2011) and to adapt to the French practice the 2015 recommendations elaborated at the time of joint European consensus conference with the participation of the three concerned European societies (ESGO, ESTRO, ESMO).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A strict methodology was used. A steering committee was put together. A systematic review of the literature since 2011 has been carried out. A first draft of the recommendations has been elaborated, with emphasis on high level of evidence. An external review by users representing all the concerned discipines and all kinds of practice was completed. Three hundred and four comments were sent by 54 reviewers.

RESULTS

The management of endometrial carcinoma requires a precise preoperative workup. A provisional estimate of the final stage is provided. This estimation impact the level of surgical staging. Surgery should use a minimal invasive approach. The final pathology is the key of the decision concerning adjuvant therapy, which involves surveillance, radiation therapy, brachytherapy, or chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The management algorithms allow a fast, state of the art based, answer to the clinical questions raised by the management of endometrial cancer. They must be used only in the setting of a multidisciplinary team at all stages of the management.