Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism by Type of Gynecologic Malignancy and Surgical Modality in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with gynecologic malignancies: A quality mini-review

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in gynecologic oncology patients with an increased risk in the postoperative period. Historically, international guidelines have recommended 28 days of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) for extended VTE prophylaxis after major abdominal and pelvic surgery for gynecologic malignancies. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as an attractive alternative to injectable anticoagulants. This quality mini-review evaluated the literature around the use of DOACs for postoperative VTE prophylaxis after surgery for gynecologic cancer. Overall, the reviewed literature supports the use of DOACs in select patients within this population which may lead to an improved patient experience, higher rates of treatment compliance, and increased cost savings.

Higher incidence of venous thromboembolism associated with increasing lines of treatment in heavily treated ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Ovarian cancer is associated with a high rate of venous thromboembolism. Our objective is to report the incidence of venous thromboembolism in recurrent ovarian cancer, assess the impact on morbidity and mortality, and evaluate predictors of venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

A retrospective single institution cohort study was performed. Patients with a diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer between 2007 and 2020 and no previous history of venous thromboembolism were identified. Demographic and clinical variables were collected. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of venous thromboembolism.

RESULTS

Of the 345 patients included in this study, 77 (22.3%) developed a venous thromboembolism. Most (n=56, 72.7%) were actively receiving treatment at the time of diagnosis of venous thromboembolism, of whom 44 (78.6%) had received three or more lines of treatment. In total, 42 (54.5%) were admitted to hospital on diagnosis and one mortality (1.3%) occurred secondary to venous thromboembolism. An intermediate/high risk Khorana score was not predictive of venous thromboembolism (p=0.24). The risk of venous thromboembolism was significantly higher with increasing lines of chemotherapy (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.28 per line, p=0.026). There was no significant difference in overall survival (62.9 vs 49.1 median months, p=0.29) between patients with and without venous thromboembolism.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 20% of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer developed a venous thromboembolism, and most occurred after three or more lines of treatment. The risk of venous thromboembolism was higher with increasing lines of chemotherapy. While venous thromboembolism did not appear to impact survival in this population, nearly half required hospitalization, emphasizing the morbidity of venous thromboembolism and potential impact on healthcare costs. Further studies are needed to improve risk stratification for venous thromboembolism in this high risk population.

Incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients with vulvar carcinoma undergoing vulvectomy with or without lymphadenectomy

OBJECTIVES

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following radical surgery for vulvar carcinoma remains poorly characterized, and recommendations for postoperative chemoprophylaxis are varied. Our objective was to assess the incidence of postoperative VTE in patients undergoing surgery for vulvar carcinoma and to determine if VTE incidence differs by radical vulvectomy with or without lymph node assessment.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients with a diagnosis of vulvar cancer undergoing radical vulvectomy with or without lymph node assessment from 2012 to 2020. Clinical characteristics and 30-day incidence of VTE as well as other postoperative outcomes were abstracted. Variables were compared using Chi-square test and Fischer's exact test, as well as Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum tests where appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 1672 patients underwent radical vulvectomy for vulvar carcinoma. 11 patients (0.7%) experienced postoperative VTE within 30 days of surgery. The incidence of VTE was similar when radical vulvectomy was performed alone or with lymph node dissection by any method (p = 0.116). Longer operative times (p = 0.033) and greater postoperative length of stay (p = 0.001) were associated with increased risk of postoperative VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of postoperative VTE is low in patients undergoing radical vulvar surgery in this national cohort. Inguinofemoral lymph node dissection by any method does not appear to be a risk factor for VTE when compared to radical vulvectomy alone. Further research is needed to determine if extended VTE prophylaxis is beneficial in this population.

Validation of the Safety and Efficacy of Apixaban as Postoperative Thromboembolism Prophylaxis for Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism is a preventable complication of gynecologic cancer surgery that leads to postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study compared apixaban with enoxaparin to identify whether apixaban had the same safety and efficacy for patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery.

METHODS

The study identified patients with a gynecologic malignancy who underwent surgery and were prescribed apixaban at discharge between June 2020 and April 2023. International Classification of Diseases 10 codes were used to identify patients who had a thromboembolism within 90 days or a bleeding event within 60 days after surgery. The rates of events for patients prescribed apixaban were compared with those for a historical cohort of patients who received enoxaparin. Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables, and t tests were used to compare continuous variables. A logistic regression was performed to compare the odds of thromboembolism between the two groups.

RESULTS

Baseline patient characteristics differed in terms of body mass index (BMI), race, route of surgery, and type of cancer. Of the 490 patients in the apixaban cohort, 12 (2.4%) had a thromboembolism compared with 3 (2.1%) of the 138 patients in the enoxaparin group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-4.70; p > 0.999). The odds ratio was adjusted for BMI, age, and route of surgery. A bleeding event occurred for 1 (0.2%) of the 490 patients in the apixaban group and for 1 (0.7%) of the 138 patients in the enoxaparin group.

CONCLUSIONS

This validation study showed that apixaban is a safe and effective method of postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. The data provide support to previous data and guideline updates recommending the use of apixaban for postoperative prophylaxis.

Postoperative venous thromboembolism risk in patients with vulvar carcinoma: An analysis of the National surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database

Objectives

Due to low incidence of vulvar cancer (VC), incidence and predictors for development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are poorly understood. We examined incidence and risk factors associated with VTE in patients undergoing surgery for VC.

Methods

We included patients who underwent surgery for VC from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. VTE within the 30-day postoperative period was captured with Current Procedural Terminology codes. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without VTE. Univariable and multivariable-adjusted exact logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between risk factors and VTE.

Results

We identified 1414 patients undergoing procedures for VC from the NSQIP database. Overall, 11 (0.8 %) patients developed VTE. Univariable predictors of VTE included surgery type [compared with simple vulvectomy: radical vulvectomy only (OR = 7.97, 95 % CI = 1.44, infinity) and radical vulvectomy plus unilateral IFN (OR = 15.98, 95 % CI = 2.70, infinity)], unplanned readmission (OR = 11.56, 95 % CI = 2.74, 46.38), deep surgical site infection (OR = 16.05, 95 % CI = 1.59-85.50), and preoperative thrombocytosis (OR = 6.53, 95 % CI = 0.00, 34.86). In a multivariable-adjusted model, longer operative time (≥72 min OR = 11.33, 95 % CI = 1.58-499.03) and preoperative functional status [compared with complete independence: total dependence (OR = 53.88, 95 % CI = 0.85, infinity) and partial dependence (OR = 53.88, 95 % CI = 0.85, infinity)] were associated with VTE.

Conclusion

In this cohort of patients with VC undergoing radical vulvectomy, VTE incidence was low. Surgery type, longer operative time, dependent functional status, and wound disruption were identified as risk factors. Our findings highlight opportunities for prophylactic intervention in certain patients.

Lower Limb Doppler Ultrasound Prior to Pneumatic Compression for the Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism in Gynecological Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism, which includes deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is the third most common cardiovascular disease after myocardial infarction and stroke. This study aimed to determine the effect of Doppler ultrasound on the prophylaxis and prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism in gynecological oncology.

METHOD

This is a retrospective cohort study of procedures performed at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between 2016 and 2021. The study included all patients diagnosed with gynecological cancers who underwent major cancer resection. A total of 295 eligible patients were enrolled and divided into two groups: the first group consisted of 104 patients who were screened for deep vein thrombosis using lower limb Doppler ultrasound prior to their gynecologic oncology surgery, while the second group included 190 patients who were not screened.

RESULTS

The prevalence of pulmonary embolism and/or deep vein thrombosis was found to be eight out of 104 patients (7.7%) in the group screened for deep-vein thrombosis using lower limb Doppler ultrasound prior to their gynecologic oncology surgery. In the group that was not screened, one out of 190 patients (0.5%) developed deep vein thrombosis. The prevalence of postoperative pulmonary embolism and/or deep-vein thrombosis was reported in four out of 104 screened patients (3.8%) and in three out of 190 patients (1.6%) in the unscreened group.

CONCLUSION

This study concluded that Doppler screening did not change the incidence of pulmonary embolism and/or deep-vein thrombosis postoperatively, but it may be helpful in detecting these conditions preoperatively. Therefore, Doppler screening for deep-vein thrombosis before surgical procedures in gynecological oncology could be considered after clinical assessment of the patient. To improve the study and address its limitations, a larger sample size would help to further investigate and identify relevant factors and determine their significance.

Gynecological Cancer and Venous Thromboembolism: A Narrative Review to Increase Awareness and Improve Risk Assessment and Prevention

The prevention and appropriate management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients is of paramount importance. However, the literature data report an underestimation of this major problem in patients with gynecological cancers, with an inconsistent venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis in this patient setting. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the available evidence regarding the management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients, focusing on the specific context of gynecological tumors, exploring the literature discussing risk factors, risk assessment, and pharmacological prophylaxis. We found that the current understanding and management of venous thromboembolism in gynecological malignancy is largely based on studies on solid cancers in general. Hence, further, larger, and well-designed research in this area is needed.

Risk of thrombosis and bleeding in gynecologic cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to provide procedure-specific estimates of the risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in the absence of thromboprophylaxis, following gynecologic cancer surgery.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted comprehensive searches on Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for observational studies. We also reviewed reference lists of eligible studies and review articles. We performed separate searches for randomized trials addressing effects of thromboprophylaxis and conducted a web-based survey on thromboprophylaxis practice.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Observational studies enrolling ≥50 adult patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery procedures reporting absolute incidence for at least 1 of the following were included: symptomatic pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic venous thromboembolism, bleeding requiring reintervention (including reexploration and angioembolization), bleeding leading to transfusion, or postoperative hemoglobin <70 g/L.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility, performed data extraction, and evaluated risk of bias of eligible articles. We adjusted the reported estimates for thromboprophylaxis and length of follow-up and used the median value from studies to determine cumulative incidence at 4 weeks postsurgery stratified by patient venous thromboembolism risk factors. The GRADE approach was applied to rate evidence certainty.

RESULTS

We included 188 studies (398,167 patients) reporting on 37 gynecologic cancer surgery procedures. The evidence certainty was generally low to very low. Median symptomatic venous thromboembolism risk (in the absence of prophylaxis) was <1% in 13 of 37 (35%) procedures, 1% to 2% in 11 of 37 (30%), and >2.0% in 13 of 37 (35%). The risks of venous thromboembolism varied from 0.1% in low venous thromboembolism risk patients undergoing cervical conization to 33.5% in high venous thromboembolism risk patients undergoing pelvic exenteration. Estimates of bleeding requiring reintervention varied from <0.1% to 1.3%. Median risks of bleeding requiring reintervention were <1% in 22 of 29 (76%) and 1% to 2% in 7 of 29 (24%) procedures.

CONCLUSION

Venous thromboembolism reduction with thromboprophylaxis likely outweighs the increase in bleeding requiring reintervention in many gynecologic cancer procedures (eg, open surgery for ovarian cancer and pelvic exenteration). In some procedures (eg, laparoscopic total hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy), thromboembolism and bleeding risks are similar, and decisions depend on individual risk prediction and values and preferences regarding venous thromboembolism and bleeding.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) use for prolonged venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following surgery for gynaecological malignancies in Australia and New Zealand - A clinician survey

BACKGROUND

Current international guidelines recommend 28 days of enoxaparin as venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after surgery for gynaecologic cancer. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been investigated as an alternative to enoxaparin for post-operative VTE prophylaxis. High-quality evidence to demonstrate safety and efficacy is lacking.

AIMS

We aim to investigate the current practice regarding VTE prophylaxis among gynaecological oncologists in Australia and New Zealand following laparotomy for gynaecological malignancy, in particular the use of DOACs for VTE prophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-seven practising gynaecologic oncologists (GO) were identified through Royal Australia and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists database and emailed online surveys that asked about VTE prophylaxis practice and views of DOACs in this setting. Data were then collected through Survey Monkey and evaluated.

RESULTS

The majority (77.1%) routinely prescribed 28 days of enoxaparin following laparotomy for gynaecological malignancies. In clinical circumstance such as laparoscopy for gynaecological malignancies and surgery for vulva malignancies, there was variation in thromboprophylaxis practices. No GO reported routine use of DOACs in any clinical circumstance. There were 56% of GOs who used a DOAC in their practice at some point. Barriers to routine use of DOACs in current practice included insufficient evidence (68%), issue with cost (40.4%) and concerns about safety (29.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Enoxaparin prescribed for 28 days remains the current clinical practice in preventing VTE following laparotomy for gynaecological malignancy. The main barrier to routine DOAC use as post-operative thromboprophylaxis is a lack of evidence which reflects the need for a larger prospective study.

Does the diagnostic timing of cancer-associated thromboembolism influence the survival outcome in ovarian cancer patients?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Efforts were made to explore the influence of diagnostic timing for cancer-associated thromboembolic events on survival of ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 75 ovarian cancer patients with thromboembolism and evaluated the prognostic factors affecting disease-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

These 75 patients were classified into two categories by the diagnostic timing of the thromboembolism, during (33 cases) and after (42 cases) initial diagnosis of ovarian cancer groups. The diagnostic timing of thromboembolism was not related to disease-free survival or overall survival of the studied population. Advanced disease stage, clear cell histology, interval debulking surgery, no recurrence/persistence of ovarian cancer, and patients treated with anticoagulant(s) treatment >3 months were associated with the disease-free survival. Advanced disease stage, clear cell histology, body mass index (BMI) ≥24 kg/m2 at the diagnosis of ovarian cancer, and no recurrence/persistence of ovarian cancer influenced the overall survival. In the subgroup analysis, compared to the after initial ovarian cancer diagnosis group, patients with stage I/II disease, BMI <24 kg/m2 at the diagnosis of ovarian cancer, or primary debulking surgery in the during cancer diagnosis group had longer disease-free survival, and overall survival benefit was observed in cases with stage I/II disease, or primary debulking surgery.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic timing of thromboembolism was not related to disease-free or overall survival of ovarian cancer patients, but associated with that of specific patient subgroups.

Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Robotic Staging for Endometrial Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to estimate the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after robotic staging for endometrial cancer and to compare the incidence of VTE in patients who received a single dose of preoperative prophylaxis of enoxaparin with those who received extended postoperative prophylaxis.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent robot-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Patients were categorized into two groups: preoperative prophylaxis (PP), patients who received a single dose of enoxaparin preoperatively, and extended prophylaxis (EP), patients who received 28 days of enoxaparin postoperatively.

RESULTS

In total, 148 patients were included, with 117 patients in the PP group and 31 patients in the EP group. The overall incidence of VTE within 30 days postoperatively was 0.67%. No significant difference was found between the PP and the EP groups (0.9% and 0%, respectively; P = 1.00). Most patients in the cohort had endometrioid adenocarcinoma (78%) with low-grade disease (70%), although there were a greater number of patients in the PP group with uterine serous carcinoma compared with the EP group (17% vs 10%; P = 0.034). The PP group had higher estimated blood loss (106 vs 81 mL; P = 0.009) and longer operative times (178 vs 151 min; P = 0.028) compared with the EP group. Significantly more patients in the PP group underwent lymph node dissection compared with the EP group (32% vs 7%; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of VTE following robot-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer in this study was 0.67%. No significant difference was found in VTE incidence between the PP group compared with the EP group. Mechanical prophylaxis plus a single dose of preoperative pharmacologic prophylaxis may suffice for low-risk patients following robotic surgical staging for endometrial cancer.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Is it time for thromboprophylaxis?

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to determine the incidence, timing, and risk factors for venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) in patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We explored the utilization of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for VTE treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with advanced stage EOC receiving NACT followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) at a single institution. Risk factors were compared between patients with versus without VTE between EOC diagnosis and 180 days after ICS. Bleeding complications were compared between patient who received a DOAC versus non-DOAC.

RESULTS

VTE cases occurred amongst 33 of the 154 (21.4%) patients with 4 (2.6%) concurrent with EOC diagnosis, 9 (5.8%) between EOC diagnosis and NACT start, 13 (8.4%) between NACT start and ICS, and 7 (4.5%) within 180 days after ICS. There were no statistically significant differences in risk factors assessed (age, body mass index, functional status, histology, Khorana score, and smoking history) between patients with versus without VTE. Eleven patients (33.3%) received a DOAC for VTE treatment. There were no significant differences in number of intraoperative blood transfusions (p = 0.38), blood loss (p = 0.95), or bleeding complications (p = 0.53) between patients treated with a DOAC versus a non-DOAC.

CONCLUSION

There is a high incidence of VTE events (21.4%) in patients with advanced stage EOC undergoing NACT. Two-thirds of the VTEs may have been prevented with thromboprophylaxis as they occurred between EOC diagnosis and ICS. These data support consideration of thromboprophylaxis in all patients with advanced stage EOC undergoing NACT.

Risk of venous thromboembolism and bleeding after major surgery for ovarian cancer: standard in-hospital versus extended duration of thromboprophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in patients with ovarian cancer after major surgery. Based on limited data, international guidelines recommend extended thromboprophylaxis for up to 28 days.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence of VTE and bleeding within 30 days following major surgery in patients with ovarian cancer and to evaluate the association between VTE and thromboprophylaxis duration.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, "before-after" cohort study in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing major surgery. Before July 2019, the local protocol mandated a standard course of thromboprophylaxis during hospital stay only. From July 2019 onward, patients received extended thromboprophylaxis for 28 days. The cumulative incidences of VTE and major bleeding within 30 days after surgery were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between thromboprophylaxis duration and VTE incidence.

RESULTS

Between January 2018 and December 2020, 250 women were included, of which 118 (47.2%) received extended and 132 (52.8%) standard thromboprophylaxis. During follow-up, 12 patients developed VTE (cumulative incidence, 4.8%; 95% CI, 2.1-7.4) and 2 major bleeding (cumulative incidence 0.8%; 95% CI, 0.0-1.9). Compared with standard thromboprophylaxis, VTE incidence was numerically lower with extended duration of thromboprophylaxis (5/118 [4.2%] vs 7/132 [5.3%]) but not significantly different (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.25-2.52). The risk of major bleeding was similar in both groups (1/118 [0.8%] vs 1/132 [0.8%]; hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.07-17.89).

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative VTE incidence in patients with ovarian cancer following major surgery was considerable. Extended thromboprophylaxis was safe and associated with a numerically lower risk of VTE but not significantly different.

Venous Thromboembolism in Japanese Patients with Gynecologic Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Gynecologic cancer, including cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer, comprises the fifth leading type of cancer and is an important malignant disease in women. Previous studies in Western countries have reported respective prevalence rates for venous thromboembolism (VTE) of 3.3%-18.7%, 0.8%-8.1%, and 7.2%-20.9%. In this study, we aimed to identify the characteristics associated with VTE in Japanese patients.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective cohort study to compare the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with each gynecologic cancer with and without concomitant VTE. Patients: Patients with cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancer treated at Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Japan, from April 2010 to March 2020.

RESULTS

Among 699 patients with gynecologic cancer, 50 developed VTE within 5 years after their cancer diagnosis, including 16/357 patients with cervical cancer (5.6%), 12/185 with endometrial cancer (6.8%), and 22/157 with ovarian cancer (14.6%). The 1-year mortality rate after symptomatic VTE onset was 47.8%. The VTE group included significantly more older patients and more patients with advanced cancer or poor performance status compared with the non-VTE group. There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical treatment. Symptomatic, but not asymptomatic VTE, was associated with shorter survival.

CONCLUSION

Several baseline characteristics differed between patients with and without VTE. The incidences of VTE and some risk factors were similar in Japanese patients with gynecologic cancers compared with patients in other countries. Patients with VTE had some factors that worsened their prognosis, with patients with gynecologic cancer and symptomatic VTE having an especially poor prognosis.

A Systematic Review of the Guidelines on Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Gynecologic Oncology

(1) Background: This review aimed to summarize the indications for venous thromboembolic (VTE) events' prophylaxis in a gynecological cancer population, according to the most recent guidelines. (2) Methods: A systematic review of the guidelines in PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINHAL regarding VTE prevention in gynecological cancer patients was conducted according to PRISMA criteria. We compared the recommendations given by oncological and hematological societies regarding VTE prevention in gynecological cancer patients published from January 2010 through March 2021. We searched for the following keywords: "venous thromboembolism prevention", "cancer", and "guidelines". The AGREE II checklist was used to critically analyze the guidelines' quality. (3) Results: There were 1003 documents available; 14 met the inclusion criteria, 5 were excluded and, eventually, the guidelines of 10 societies were evaluated. (4) Conclusions: The guidelines agree that low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and fondaparinux achieve better results in VTE prevention in gynecological cancer patients. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) can be used to prevent VTE in outpatients and high-risk medical patients after discharge. VTE risk scores should be applied to all oncological patients to identify those who would benefit from a prevention program. More attention should be paid to mechanical prophylactic methods due to the high bleeding risk of gynecological cancer patients.

Incidence of postoperative thrombotic events in ovarian cancer patients with a de-escalated prophylactic strategy: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the incidence of thrombotic events in ovarian cancer patients following a de-escalated prophylactic strategy and to stratify risk groups.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of patients who underwent debulking surgery for ovarian cancer at a single institution between January 2007 and May 2019. We identified clinically diagnosed and radiologically confirmed cases of thrombotic events-classified as pulmonary thromboembolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and other thrombotic events-within 6 months of debulking surgery.

RESULTS

After excluding 13 patients diagnosed with thromboembolism at the baseline or during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 799 were analyzed. Since the introduction of medical prophylaxis at our institution in 2009, 482 patients (60%) received medical prophylaxis with subcutaneous injection of low molecular weight heparin for 5 days with mechanical prophylaxis, whereas 317 (40%) received mechanical prophylaxis only. After debulking surgery, thrombotic events occurred in 28 patients (3.5%) including PE (n = 11), DVT (n = 10), and other thrombotic events (n = 7). Multivariable analysis identified age, body mass index (BMI), and operative duration as independent risk factors associated with thrombotic events. A thrombotic event was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.16-4.1). A cut-off analysis for pre-operative identifiable risk factors showed age < 57 years and BMI < 21 could help define low-risk groups. One patient from 172 low-risk patients (0.58%) experienced a thrombotic event.

CONCLUSIONS

The thrombotic event incidence was low in our cohort. A de-escalated prophylaxis strategy may be considered in young (age < 57 years) and lean (BMI < 21) patients.

Use of direct oral anticoagulants for postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after surgery for gynecologic malignancies

Venous thromboembolism is a preventable cause of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing surgery for malignancy. Current standard of care based on international guideline recommends 28 days of extended thromboprophylaxis after major abdominal and pelvic surgery for malignancies with unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin. Direct oral anticoagulants have been approved for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in the general population. This regimen has a significant advantage over other types of anticoagulation regimens, particularly being administered by non-parenteral routes and without the need for laboratory monitoring. In this review, we evaluate the role of direct anticoagulation and provide an update on completed and ongoing clinical trials.

Low incidence of venous thromboembolism after gynecologic oncology surgery: Who is at greatest risk?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the 30-day incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after gynecologic oncologic surgery and identify perioperative factors associated with postoperative VTE.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried to identify all gynecologic oncology cases from 2013 to 2019. Clinical and surgical characteristics, VTE events and 30-day postoperative complications were retrieved. Chi-square analysis and logistic regression models were performed to compare characteristics and postoperative outcomes of patients with and without VTE.

RESULTS

A total of 63,198 gynecologic oncology patients were included. The incidence of 30-day postoperative VTE was 1.2% (n = 781). On multivariable analysis, postoperative VTE was significantly associated with ascites (odds ratio (OR) 1.8), disseminated cancer (OR 1.7), pre-operative albumin <30 g/L (OR 1.9), laparotomy (OR 2.8), operative time > 180 min (OR 2.0), and increased surgical complexity (OR 2.2) (all p < 0.001). The incidence of VTE was higher after laparotomy compared to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (2.3% v. 0.6%, p < 0.001). When stratified by type of gynecologic malignancy undergoing laparotomy, incidence of VTE was higher in patients with ovarian (2.4%) and uterine (2.4%) malignancies, compared to cervical cancer (1.1%) (p < 0.001). The 30-day incidence of VTE was 1.7% in 2013 compared to 0.9% in 2019 (laparotomy: 2.6% in 2013 to 1.6% in 2019 and MIS: 0.8% in 2013 to 0.4% in 2019).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative VTE is a potentially preventable complication of gynecologic oncology surgery. Our findings indicate that laparotomy, ascites, disseminated cancer, longer operative time, and low pre-operative albumin are risk factors for VTE.

Perioperative incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with ovarian cancer using 4 different data collection methods: a Manitoba Ovarian Cancer Outcomes (MOCO) group study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 90-day pre-operative period and at 30 and 90 days post surgery in patients who underwent debulking for ovarian cancer, analyze the impact of extended prophylaxis that was initiated in 2012, and examine the influence of data collection technique on reported rates of VTE.

METHODS

This retrospective database and records study examined rates of VTE in epithelial ovarian cancer patients in Manitoba, Canada between 2004 and 2016. Cases of VTE were identified using ICD codes, drug prescriptions, and records reviews; 4 different data collection methods were used. Analysis was performed with analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis and χ² tests, and interrupted time series models.

RESULTS

Data collection identified 823 debulking surgeries, with a final cohort of 779 patients; data were analyzed before and after extended prophylaxis intervention. Overall rates of VTE varied by collection method and were 1.82%-5.47%, 0.36%-3.16%, 0.85%-1.46%, and 1.46%-2.79%, respectively. During this timeframe, we noted a significant increase in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.010) and stage migration to stage 3 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We report the rates of VTE utilizing four different data collection methods. We found a low overall rate, with some trends requiring further investigation. This study highlights the importance of data collection method on the reported rates of VTE in research.

Systematic reviews of observational studies of Risk of Thrombosis and Bleeding in General and Gynecologic Surgery (ROTBIGGS): introduction and methodology

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding are serious and potentially fatal complications of surgical procedures. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis decreases the risk of VTE but increases the risk of major post-operative bleeding. The decision to use pharmacologic prophylaxis therefore represents a trade-off that critically depends on the incidence of VTE and bleeding in the absence of prophylaxis. These baseline risks vary widely between procedures, but their magnitude is uncertain. Systematic reviews addressing baseline risks are scarce, needed, and require innovations in methodology. Indeed, systematic summaries of these baseline risk estimates exist neither in general nor gynecologic surgery. We will fill this knowledge gap by performing a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the procedure-specific and patient risk factor stratified risk estimates in general and gynecologic surgeries.

METHODS

We will perform comprehensive literature searches for observational studies in general and gynecologic surgery reporting symptomatic VTE or bleeding estimates. Pairs of methodologically trained reviewers will independently assess the studies for eligibility, evaluate the risk of bias by using an instrument developed for this review, and extract data. We will perform meta-analyses and modeling studies to adjust the reported risk estimates for the use of thromboprophylaxis and length of follow up. We will derive the estimates of risk from the median estimates of studies rated at the lowest risk of bias. The primary outcomes are the risk estimates of symptomatic VTE and major bleeding at 4 weeks post-operatively for each procedure stratified by patient risk factors. We will apply the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate evidence certainty.

DISCUSSION

This series of systematic reviews, modeling studies, and meta-analyses will inform clinicians and patients regarding the trade-off between VTE prevention and bleeding in general and gynecologic surgeries. Our work advances the standards in systematic reviews of surgical complications, including assessment of risk of bias, criteria for arriving at the best estimates of risk (including modeling of the timing of events and dealing with suboptimal data reporting), dealing with subgroups at higher and lower risk of bias, and use of the GRADE approach.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021234119.

Postoperative venous thromboembolism in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery: Does modality matter?

OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly utilized for gynecologic cancers. While incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after MIS is low, some guidelines recommend extended chemoprophylaxis for these patients undergoing MIS. Our objectives were to determine incidence of postoperative VTE in patients undergoing MIS, evaluate differences in the incidence by MIS modality and assess the need for extended chemoprophylaxis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients undergoing MIS (robot-assisted, multi-port laparoscopy, single-port laparoscopy) for gynecologic cancers between January 2014 and December 2018 at our institution. Demographic and perioperative variables were collected. Patients <18 years, with benign pathology, or on preoperative anticoagulation were excluded. Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and one-way ANOVA were performed to determine risk factors related to VTE occurrence.

RESULTS

We identified 806 patients who underwent MIS with median age 61. Most had Stage I disease (81.5%) and uterine cancer (81.5%). Five VTE events occurred within 90 days following surgery (0.6%). Incidence of 90-day VTE did not differ between MIS modalities (p = 0.6). Patients with longer OR times (p = 0.004) were more likely to experience VTE. Age, smoking status, BMI, type of cancer and stage were not significant risk factors for VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of postoperative VTE in patients with gynecologic cancers undergoing MIS is low and does not appear to differ by MIS modality. Given the very low incidence of postoperative VTE, extended chemoprophylaxis is unlikely to benefit patients with gynecologic malignancies undergoing MIS procedures.

Risk of venous thromboembolism for ovarian cancer patients during first-line therapy after implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol

OBJECTIVE

To determine incidence and risk factors for VTE for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing first-line therapy, including cytoreductive surgery, on an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for patients with FIGO stage IIIA-IVB epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer undergoing primary or interval cytoreductive surgery from March 2017 through September 2019. All patients were enrolled on an ERAS protocol, including 28-day postoperative VTE prophylaxis. Demographic information, medical history, perioperative characteristics, and ERAS compliance were evaluated using univariate and multivariate models.

RESULTS

Of 230 patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery via laparotomy, 155 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 75 received primary cytoreduction. 38 patients had a VTE during the study period. 13 events (5.7%) were identified at time of diagnosis, 6 (3.9%) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 5 (2.2%) within 30 days after surgery, 5 (2.2%) between 30 days and 6 months after surgery, and 9 (3.9%) after the 6-month window. The cumulative incidence of VTE was 6.1% (95% CI, 4.3-8.8%) within 6 months after diagnosis and 8.5% (6.2-11.4%) within 1 year after diagnosis. Estimated blood loss (adjusted HR 1.22 [95% CI, 1.09-1.36], p = 0.001) and history of VTE (7.06 [2.34-21.29], p = 0.001) were independently associated with VTE.

CONCLUSION

With implementation of an ERAS protocol, only 1 in 46 patients experienced a VTE within 30 days after surgery. However, overall VTE occurred in 1 in 16 patients during first-line therapy. Strategies to further reduce VTE risk, especially during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surveillance, should be investigated.

Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer and Impact on Survival

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), identify risk factors for VTE, and assess the effect of VTE on treatment trajectory and overall survival.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer treated with NACT between 2013 to 2016 in Alberta, Canada. The primary outcome was incidence of VTE during NACT. Secondary outcomes were risk factors for VTE and overall survival. Data related to patient demographics, cancer treatment, and incidence of VTE were collected. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier estimates and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 284 patients were included in this study. Average age at diagnosis was 63.8 years. The incidence of VTE during NACT was 13.3%. Patients with VTE were less likely to undergo interval debulking surgery (58.3%) than patients without VTE (78.6%). Kaplan-Meier estimates demonstrated a decrease in overall survival in patients who had VTE during NACT (15.0 mo; 95% CI 14.5-16.5) compared with patients who did not (26.8 mo; 95% CI 22.8-30.9) (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified albumin <35 g/L, BMI >30 kg/m², and non-serous histology as risk factors for VTE.

CONCLUSION

The risk of VTE in this cohort was 13.3%, which was associated with decreased overall survival. These findings suggest that thromboprophylaxis may have a role in this patient population.

A quality improvement initiative to reduce venous thromboembolism on a gynecologic oncology service

OBJECTIVE

To describe and evaluate the effects of implementation of a venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis quality improvement (QI) initiative on a gynecologic oncology service at a single institution.

METHODS

Prior to 2018, no consensus gynecologic oncology VTE prophylaxis protocol existed at the authors' academic institution. Published, evidence-based guidelines were reviewed to create a standardized VTE risk stratification algorithm. Interventions to improve perioperative heparin administration and sequential compression device (SCD) compliance as well as provider/patient education efforts were introduced in January 2018. Initial efforts included nursing and patient SCD education, internal dissemination of VTE prophylaxis guidelines, and creation of a VTE 'dashboard' to track performance. During a second phase, VTE prophylaxis guidelines were reviewed and further refined, non-compliant operative cases reviewed weekly, and guidelines incorporated into the electronic medical record. Performance was measured using Tableau data software (www.tableau.com) and by separately evaluating adherence to the developed guidelines in three retrospective cancer-enriched surgical cohorts (2016-2017, 2018, 2019).

RESULTS

Compared to the baseline period, we observed a reduction in VTE rate during the 2018-2019 VTE QI implementation period from 2.1% (19/905) to 1.0% (20/2015, p = 0.02) among gynecologic oncology inpatients. In the retrospective cancer-enriched cohorts, adherence to evidence based guidelines improved: 31.0% in 2016-2017, 69.1% in 2018, and 82.4% in 2019 (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of peri-operative blood transfusion, surgical site infections, hematomas, or vaginal cuff dehiscences.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a robust VTE prophylaxis QI initiative has resulted in improved VTE prophylaxis guideline adherence and higher rates of pre-operative heparin administration.

Incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism according to primary treatment in women with ovarian cancer: A retrospective cohort study

Objective

This study aimed to investigate incidence and risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) according to primary treatment in women with ovarian cancer.

Methods

We selected 26,863 women newly diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2009 and 2018 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service databases. During the total follow-up period and the first six months after initiation of primary treatments, incidence and risk of VTE were evaluated according to primary treatment as no treatment, surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 1285.5±6 days. The VTE incidence was highest in women who underwent chemotherapy (306 per 10,000 women). Among women who underwent surgery, VTE was highest in surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (536 per 10,000 women), followed by surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy (360 per 10,000 women) and surgery alone (132 per 10,000 women). During the first 12 months, monthly incidence of VTE decreased. Compared with women with no treatment, risk of VTE significantly increased in women undergoing chemotherapy (HR 1.297; 95% CI, 1.08–1.557; P = 0.005) during the total follow-up period and decreased in women undergoing surgery (HR 0.557; 95% CI, 0.401–0.775; P<0.001) and radiotherapy (HR 0.289; 95% CI, 0.119–0.701; P = 0.006) during the first six months. Among women who underwent surgery, VTE risk significantly increased in surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 4.848; 95% CI, 1.86–12.632; P = 0.001) followed by surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 2.807; 95% CI, 1.757–4.485; P<0.001) compared with surgery alone during the total follow-up period and in surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 4.223; 95% CI, 1.37–13.022; P = 0.012) during the first six months.

Conclusions

In this large Korean cohort study, incidence and risk of VTE were highest in women with ovarian cancer who underwent chemotherapy and surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a primary cancer treatment. Incidence of VTE decreased over time.

Incidence and risk factors of VTE in patients with cervical cancer using the Korean national health insurance data

This study investigated incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cervical cancer. We selected 49,514 patients newly diagnosed with cervical cancer from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service databases. During the total follow-up period and first 6 months after initiation of primary treatments, incidence of VTE, and association of risk factors with VTE occurrence were evaluated according to primary treatments or no treatment, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. VTE occurred in 1.15% of patients with cervical cancer. Regardless of the period after initiation of primary treatments, and of VTE, the incidence of thromboembolism was highest in chemotherapy. During the first 12 months, monthly incidence of VTE was highest in chemotherapy and decreased with time in all primary treatments. Compared with no treatment, VTE risk significantly increased for all primary treatments (surgery: HR 1.492; 95% CI 1.186-1.877) (radiotherapy: HR 2.275; 95% CI 1.813-2.855) (chemotherapy: HR 4.378; 95% CI 3.095-6.193) and for chemotherapy during the first 6 months (HR 3.394; 95% CI 2.062-5.588). In this cohort study, incidence and risk of VTE in patients with cervical cancer were the highest when chemotherapy was the primary cancer treatment, and incidence of VTE decreased with time.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism Following 2462 Major Abdomino-Pelvic Surgeries in Tertiary Hospital

Purpose

To determine the incidence and risk factor of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Thai populations and to evaluate morbidity, mortality, bleeding complications and the benefit of thromboprophylaxis in real-world practice.

Patients and Methods

We performed a retrospective, single-center, cohort study of patients from all age groups who underwent elective open or laparoscopic major abdomino-pelvic surgery between January 2008 and December 2018 at Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. We collected general medical information and specific data based on items from the Caprini risk scoring system.

Results

A total of 2462 major abdomino-pelvic surgeries were included. The study population consisted of 742 males (30.1%) and 1720 females (69.9%) aged 54.59 ± 13.27 years. The incidence of VTE in Thai patients that underwent major abdominal surgery was 0.48%. The most frequent influencing factor for VTE was a history of pulmonary embolism, which increased the risk of VTE 98.28-fold, whereas a history of deep vein thrombosis increased the risk of VTE by 12.34-fold. Other factors influencing VTE development were obesity, anticoagulant use, postoperative chemotherapy, preoperative chemotherapy, endometrium cancer, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage 4 and American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) class 4. Protective factors included no history of VTE, laparoscopic surgery, TNM stage 0 and benign disease and BMI<30. VTE significantly increased mortality whereas following ACCP guideline reduced mortality.

Conclusion

Post-operative VTE incidence in Thai patients undergoing major abdomino-pelvic surgery was lower compared with Western patients. Factors influencing for VTE were history of VTE, anticoagulant use, postoperative chemotherapy, preoperative chemotherapy, endometrium cancer, TNM stage 4 and ACCP class 4. Following ACCP guideline reduced the incidence of mortality.

Incidence and risk factors for postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients with ovarian cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with ovarian malignancy. There is no meta-analysis available on this topic so far. The aim of our study was to quantitatively synthesize the data from studies with respect to the incidence and risk factors for postoperative VTE among cases with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for papers containing the key words "venous thromboembolism", "postoperative", "postoperation", "ovarian neoplasm", "ovary neoplasm", "ovarian cancer", "ovary cancer", and "cancer of ovary". Studies selection, data extraction, quality assessment of eligible studies were performed independently by our different reviewers. Meta-analyses were conducted to determine postoperative VTE incidence and risk factors in women with EOC. Sensitivity analysis were used to verify the robustness of the results of meta-analyses if necessary.

RESULTS

In total, 19 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled incidence for postoperative symptomatic VTE was 3% (95% CI, 0.03-0.04) and for postoperative symptomatic as well as asymptomatic VTE was 8% (95% CI, 0.07-0.09). The presence of history of VTE (OR, 2.37), advanced-stages (OR, 2.35), high complexity of surgery (OR, 2.20), clear cell carcinoma of ovary (OR, 2.53) and residual disease>1 cm (OR, 2.57) significantly increase the likelihood of having postoperative VTE. Other risk factors for postoperative VTE in EOC patients were BMI>30 (OR, 1.58), per 10-years increase in age (OR, 1.22), ASA score>2 (OR, 1.45), ascites (OR, 2.07), the diameter of residual disease is between 0 cm to 1 cm (OR, 2.06) and smoking history (OR, 1.54).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that VTE, especially subclinical VTE, is a prevalent complication in postoperative patients with EOC. History of VTE, advanced FIGO stages, high complexity of surgery, obesity, older age, ascites, higher ASA score, smoking history and suboptimal debulking are associated with this increased incidence of postoperative VTE among patients with EOC. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020209662.

Guidelines for vulvar and vaginal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society recommendations

This is the first collaborative Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society guideline for optimal perioperative care for vulvar and vaginal surgeries. An Embase and PubMed database search of publications was performed. Studies on each topic within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vulvar and vaginal outline were selected, with emphasis on meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective cohort studies. All studies were reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. All recommendations on the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery topics are based on the best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented.

Meta-Analysis of VTE Risk: Ovarian Cancer Patients by Stage, Histology, Cytoreduction, and Ascites at Diagnosis

Venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) have been a leading secondary cause of death among ovarian cancer patients, prompting multiple studies of risk factors. The objective of this meta-analysis is to quantify the associations between VTE and the most commonly reported risk factors among ovarian cancer patients. PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were used to identify observational studies. Two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed quality via the Newcastle–Ottawa tool. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios for VTE with each of the following exposures: advanced cancer stage, clear cell histology, serous histology, ascites at diagnosis, and complete cytoreduction. The I² and Q tests were used to evaluate heterogeneity. Twenty cohort studies with 6,324 total ovarian cancer patients, 769 of whom experienced a VTE, were included. The odds of VTE in ovarian cancer patients were higher among patients with cancer stage III/IV (versus cancer stage I/II, pooled odds ratio (OR) 2.73; 95% CI 1.84–4.06; I²= 64%), clear cell (versus nonclear cell) histology (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.55–2.89; I² = 6%), and ascites (versus no ascites) at diagnosis (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.51–2.96; I² = 32%). Serous (versus nonserous) histology (OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.91–1.75; I² = 42%) and complete (versus incomplete) cytoreduction (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.27–4.11; I² = 88%) were not associated with VTE. This meta-analysis quantifies the significantly elevated odds of VTE in ovarian cancer patients with advanced stage at diagnosis, clear cell histology, and ascites at diagnosis. Further studies are needed to account for confounders and inform clinical decision-making tools.

Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in endometrial cancer

Background

Venous thromboembolism (vte) in malignancy is associated with poor outcomes. We conducted a retrospective review of vte in patients with endometrial cancer to characterize the vte incidence, identify factors that contribute to vte risk, and compare survival outcomes in patients with and without vte.

Methods

A retrospective chart review identified 422 eligible patients who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer (1 January 2014 to 31 July 2016). The primary outcome was vte. Binary logistic regression identified risk factors for vte; significant risk factors were included in a multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimates are reported, and log rank tests were used to compare the Kaplan-Meier curves. Risk-adjusted estimates for overall survival based on vte were determined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

The incidence of vte was 6.16% overall and 0.7% within 60 days postoperatively. Non-endometrioid histology, stages 3 and 4 disease, laparotomy, and age (p < 0.1) were identified as factors associated with vte and were included in a multivariate analysis. The overall death rate in patients with vte was 42% (9% without vte): hazard ratio, 5.63; 95% confidence interval, 2.86 to 11.08; p < 0.0001. Adjusting for age, stage of disease, and histology, risk of death remained significant for patients with a vte: hazard ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 4.42; p = 0.0271.

Conclusions

A method to identify patients with endometrial cancer who are at high risk for vte is important, given the implications of vte for patient outcomes and the frequency of endometrial cancer diagnoses. Factors identified in our study might assist in the recognition of such patients.

Trends in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery for benign and malignant indications

PURPOSE

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality. We analyzed the trends in use of VTE prophylaxis over time in women undergoing hysterectomy for both benign and malignant indications.

METHODS

The Premier Database was used to identify women who underwent hysterectomy from 2011 to 2017. Women were stratified by indication for surgery (benign or malignant) and route of hysterectomy. VTE prophylaxis was classified as none, mechanical, pharmacologic, or combination (mechanical and pharmacologic). Trends in use of prophylaxis over time were analyzed. Multivariate models were developed to examine predictors of use of prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Among 920,477 patients identified, 579,824 (63.0%) received VTE prophylaxis, including 15.4% who received pharmacologic, 34.5% who received mechanical, and 13.1% who received combination prophylaxis. Overall use of prophylaxis declined annually from 68.1% in 2011 to 56.7% in 2017 (P < 0.001). Among patients with cancer, the use of prophylaxis declined from 84.5% in 2011 to 78.6% in 2017 (P < 0.001). A similar trend was noted among women with benign conditions, with rates of prophylaxis declining from 66.2 to 53.3% (P < 0.001). Additionally, use of prophylaxis declined for patients undergoing MIS hysterectomy from 65.4% in 2011 to 53.3% in 2017, and from 73.1 to 66.7% in patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy. Among patients with cancer, rates of pharmacologic and combined prophylaxis was 70.9% in 2011 and 69.7% in 2017. However, among women with benign conditions, the rates of pharmacologic and combined prophylaxis rose from 19.4% in 2011 to 25.6% in 2017 (P < 0.001). Despite these changes in prophylaxis rates and methods, there was no significant change in the rate of VTE between 2011 and 2017 (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Despite the lack of change in guidelines for VTE prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery, the overall rates of prophylaxis decreased over time independent of the indication or route of surgery. The rates of thromboembolic events did not significantly increase in response to the decreased use of VTE prophylaxis.

Dual mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis decreases risk of pulmonary embolus after laparotomy for gynecologic malignancies

OBJECTIVES

Patients with gynecologic malignancies have high rates of post-operative venous thromboembolism. Currently, there is no consensus for peri-operative thromboprophylaxis specific to gynecologic oncology. We aimed to compare rates of symptomatic pulmonary embolus within 30 days post-operatively, and to identify risk factors for pulmonary embolus.

METHODS

The Division of Gynecologic Oncology at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre implemented dual thromboprophylaxis for laparotomies in December 2017. We conducted a prospective study of laparotomies for gynecologic malignancies from December 2017 to October 2018, with comparison to historical cohort from January 2016 to November 2017 using the institutional National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (NSQIP). Pre-intervention, patients received low molecular weight heparin during admission and extended 28-day prophylaxis was continued at the surgeon's discretion. Post-intervention, all patients received both mechanical thromboprophylaxis with sequential compression devices during admission and 28-day prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin.

RESULTS

There were 371 and 163 laparotomies pre- and post-intervention, respectively. Patient characteristics (age, body mass index, diabetes, smoking, tumor stage), rate of malignant cases, operative blood loss and duration, and length of stay were similar between groups. After implementation, pulmonary emboli rates decreased from 5.1% to 0% (p=0.001). There were more cytoreductive procedures pre-intervention (p≤0.0001) but surgical complexity scores were similar (p=0.82). Univariate analysis revealed that surgery pre-intervention (OR 4.25, 95% CI 1.04 to 17.43, p=0.04), length of stay ≥5 days (OR 11.94, 95% CI 2.65 to 53.92, p=0.002), and operative blood loss ≥500 mL (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.05 to 7.8, p=0.04) increased risk of pulmonary embolus. On multivariable analysis, surgery pre-intervention remained associated with more pulmonary emboli (OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.03 to 16.79, p=0.045), when adjusting for operative blood loss.

CONCLUSION

Dual thromboprophylaxis after laparotomy significantly reduced rates of pulmonary embolus in this high-risk patient population.

Safety and Efficacy of Apixaban vs Enoxaparin for Preventing Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism in Women Undergoing Surgery for Gynecologic Malignant Neoplasm: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Current guidelines recommend a 28-day course of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after surgery for gynecologic cancer. The high cost of this medication and the low adherence rates observed in prior studies provide an opportunity to benefit patients by demonstrating the safety of a more cost-effective, easier to use thromboprophylactic.

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of an oral treatment alternative for thromboprophylaxis in postoperative patients with gynecologic cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a patient-based, multicenter, open-label, blinded, end point, randomized clinical trial conducted May 2015 to March 2019 in outpatient and inpatient gynecologic oncology settings. Women undergoing surgery for suspected or confirmed gynecologic cancer were approached for recruitment. The trial compared rates of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events during a 90-day follow-up period in patients taking apixaban or enoxaparin for postoperative thromboprophylaxis using a modified intent-to-treat analysis. Data analysis was performed from October to December 2019.

Interventions

Women were randomized to 28 days of apixaban (2.5 mg orally twice daily) or enoxaparin (40 mg subcutaneously daily).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events. Secondary outcomes included incidence of venous thromboembolic events, adverse events, medication adherence, participant quality of life, and medication satisfaction.

Results

Of 500 women recruited for the study, 400 were enrolled and randomized (median age, 58.0 years; range, 18.0-89.0 years); 204 received apixaban and 196 received enoxaparin. Treatment groups did not differ in terms of race/ethnicity, cancer stage, or surgery modality (open vs robotic). There were no statistically significant differences between the apixaban and enoxaparin groups in terms of rates of major bleeding events (1 patient [0.5%] vs 1 patient [0.5%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.07-16.76; P > .99), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events (12 patients [5.4%] vs 19 patients [9.7%]; OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.87-4.1; P = .11), venous thromboembolic events (2 patients [1.0%] vs 3 patients [1.5%]; OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.26-9.50; P = .68), adverse events, medication adherence, or quality of life between the groups. Participant satisfaction was significantly greater in the apixaban group with regard to ease of taking the medication (186 patients [98.9%] vs 110 patients [58.8%]; OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.25; P < .001) and pain associated with taking the medication (4 patients [2.1%] vs 92 patients [49.2%]; OR, 9.20; 95% CI, 2.67-31.82; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that oral apixaban is a potentially safe, less painful, and easier-to-take alternative to subcutaneous enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after surgery for gynecologic cancer. The efficacy of apixaban to prevent venous thromboembolic events is hypothesized as being equivalent.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02366871.

Efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Thrombosis is a common complication in patients with cancer. Whether thromboprophylaxis could benefit patients with cancer is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer undergoing surgery or chemotherapy.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, and Web of Science for studies published before May 2018 to investigate whether thromboprophylaxis measures were more effective than a placebo in patients with cancer.

RESULTS

In total, 33 trials with 11,942 patients with cancer were identified. In patients with cancer undergoing surgery, the administration of thromboprophylaxis was associated with decreasing trends in venous thromboembolism (VTE) [relative risk (RR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.81] and DVT (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.87). In patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, the administration of thromboprophylaxis reduced the incidences of VTE, DVT, and pulmonary embolism compared with no thromboprophylaxis (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.73; RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.73; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.81, respectively). The pooled results regarding major bleeding showed no significant difference between prophylaxis and no prophylaxis in either the surgical or the chemotherapy groups (RR 2.35, 95% CI 0.74-7.52, p = 0.1482, I2 = 0%; RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.93-1.83, p = 0.1274, I2 = 0%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Thromboprophylaxis did not increase major bleeding events or the incidence of thrombocytopenia. All-cause mortality was not significantly different between those who received thromboprophylaxis and those who did not. This meta-analysis provides evidence that thromboprophylaxis can reduce the number of VTE and DVT events, with no apparent increase in the incidence of major bleeding in patients with cancer.

Incidence and risk factors of preoperative venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism in patients with ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

To determine the incidence and predisposing factors of preoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with ovarian cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 387 patients with primary ovarian cancer, whose preoperative work up included both ultrasonography of lower extremity vein and spiral computed tomography pulmonary angiogram, from September 2013 to November 2016. SPSS 22 was used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

The incidence of preoperative VTE and PE was 13.4% (52 patients), 9.3%(36 patients), respectively. Both the univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that D-dimer (DDI) level, age, and massive ascites were associated with preoperative VTE. Moreover, DDI level (odds ratio [OR] 3.133, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.193-8.225, p = .02), massive ascites (OR 9.972, 95% CI 3.687-26.968, p < .001), and preoperative deep vein thrombosis (OR 5.977, 95% CI 2.073-17.228, p = .001) were independent predictors for preoperative PE. Additionally, the incidence of preoperative VTE and PE increased with increasing DDI levels (p < .001). DDI level < 1.5 μg/ml has 100% negative predictive value and 100% sensitivity for diagnosis of preoperative VTE and PE; however, DDI >5 μg/ml, the incidence of preoperative VTE and PE were 18.4% and 14.2% respectively. Moreover, DDI value was significantly correlated with preoperative PE volume (r = 0.746, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative VTE and PE are common events in patients with ovarian cancer. DDI level is a useful parameter for diagnosing and evaluating preoperative VTE and PE.

Predictive Factors of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Gynecologic Cancer Survivors with Lower Extremity Edema: A Single-Center and Retrospective Study

This study was conducted to examine predictive factors of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in gynecologic cancer survivors with lower extremity edema (LEE). In the current single-center, retrospective study, there was a total of 315 eligible patients, including 80 patients with DVT and 235 without DVT. They were therefore divided into two groups: the DVT group (n = 80) and the non-DVT group (n = 235). Then, baseline and clinical characteristics of the patients were compared between the two groups. In our study, distant organ metastasis, advanced stage, lymphadectomy, and amount of intraoperative blood loss had a positive predictive value for the occurrence of DVT in gynecologic cancer survivors presenting LEE. In conclusion, our results indicate that it is necessary to consider the possibility of LEE arising from DVT in gynecologic cancer survivors with advanced-stage cancer, distant organ metastasis, lymphadectomy, and intraoperative blood loss over 1500 mL.

Complex management of acute superior mesenteric venous thrombosis in the setting of metastatic ovarian cancer

•

Superior mesenteric vein thrombosis (SMVT) is rare but seen in patients with hypercoagulable states.

•

Prevention of mortality in patients with SMVT requires immediate diagnosis and complex management.

•

A hierarchical approach to treatment progresses to more aggressive treatment as needed.

•

Supportive care, medication, and endovascular and/or surgical interventions are available management options.

•

In patients with underlying conditions, long-term treatment such as anticoagulation must also be initiated.

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism after oncologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The risk and prognosis of VTE associated with oncologic surgery need to be quantified to guide patient management. We aimed to examine the availability of data and to report the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients after surgery, as well as the clinical outcomes of VTE following oncologic surgery.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases for terms related to VTE after oncologic surgery from inception to November 1, 2017. A random-effects meta-analysis was done to calculate the pooled incidence of VTE.

RESULTS

Of the 8611 citations identified, 136 studies including 1,481,659 patients met the eligibility criteria. The overall incidence of VTE was estimated to be 2.3% (95% CI 2.1-2.5). Bone and soft tissue cancer (10.6%, 95% CI 2.9-18.2) and lung cancer (8.1%, 95% CI 3.7-12.6) were associated with the highest and second highest risk of postoperative VTE, respectively. Age (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.46, 95% CI 0.40-0.53; I² = 93.8%), radiation (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.62; I² = 34.6%), transfusion (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.48-2.59; I² = 57.0%), and operative time (SMD = 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.16; I² = 100%) were possible risk factors for postoperative VTE. Patients with VTE versus those without had increased odds of all-cause fatal events (11.15, 95% CI 4.07-30.56; I² = 92.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of VTE after oncologic surgery remains high, and this risk varied according to the cancer type, study region, surgical location, and thromboprophylactic strategy. VTE is associated with increased mortality at the early stage of cancer surgery.

The role of pelvic lymphocele in the development of early postoperative complications

With the increasing incidence of gynecologic malignancy, radical hysterectomy represents an important part of the adequate treatment of these patients. The pelvic lymphocele is a known side effect of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. The aim of our study was to assess the role of the lymphocele in the development of early postoperative complications.A single-center, retrospective analysis between January 2000 and May 2017 revealed 1867 patients with cervical and endometrial cancer, treated through radical or modified radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Postoperative complications and the occurrence of pelvic lymphocele were evaluated.Approximately 47.6% of patients were diagnosed with pelvic lymphocele, with only 5.2% being symptomatic. Early postoperative complications rate recorded an incidence of 8.1%, occurring more frequent if lymphocele were present (P < .001). The pelvic lymphocele represented, in univariate analysis, a risk factor for the development of pelvic abscesses, but not for deep vein thrombosis, lymphedema, or bowel obstruction. Hydronephrosis was found to be significantly correlated with the pelvic lymphocele, but we believe this urological complication to have a different underlining mechanism. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy represented in both uni- and multivariate analysis a risk factor for the occurrence of postoperative complications.In the postoperative context of oncogynecological surgery, pelvic lymphocele occur at high rates, representing a statistical risk factor for hydronephrosis and pelvic abscesses, with neoadjuvant radiotherapy being an independent risk factor for early postoperative complications.

Narcotics reduction, quality and safety in gynecologic oncology surgery in the first year of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol implementation

OBJECTIVES

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs are mechanisms for achieving value-based improvements in surgery. This report provides a detailed analysis of the impact of an ERAS program on patient outcomes as well as quality and safety measures during implementation on a gynecologic oncology service at a major academic medical center.

METHODS

A retrospective review of gynecologic oncology patients undergoing elective laparotomy during the implementation phase of an ERAS program (January 2016 through December 2016) was performed. Patient demographics, surgical variables, postoperative outcomes, and adherence to core safety measures, including antimicrobial and venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, were compared to a historical patient cohort (January 2015 through December 2015). Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and Chi squared tests.

RESULTS

The inaugural 109 ERAS program participants were compared to a historical patient cohort (n=158). There was no difference in BMI, race, malignancy, or complexity of procedure between cohorts. ERAS patients required less narcotics (70.7 vs 127.4, p=0.007, oral morphine equivalents) and PCA use (32.1% vs. 50.6%, p=0.002). Despite this substantial reduction in narcotics, ERAS patients did not report more pain and in fact reported significantly less pain by postoperative day 3. There were no differences in length of stay (5days), complication rates (13.8% vs. 20.3%, p=0.17) or 30-day readmission rates (9.5 vs 11.9%, p=0.54) between ERAS and historical patients, respectively. Compliance with antimicrobial prophylaxis was 97.2%. However, 33.9% of ERAS patients received substandard preoperative VTE prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS program implementation resulted in reductions in narcotic requirements and PCA use without changes in length of stay or readmission rates. Compliance should be diligently audited during the implementation phase of ERAS programs, with special attention to adherence to pre-existing core safety measures.

Saddle pulmonary embolus resulting in cardiovascular collapse requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a postoperative patient with endometrial cancer

Background

Venous thromboembolism after open gynecologic surgery is not uncommon, especially in the presence of other risk factors such as obesity, prolonged surgical time or gynecologic malignancy.

Case

We present the case of a 62 y.o. patient who underwent open hysterectomy and surgical staging for uterine serous carcinoma. She was readmitted with lower extremity edema. During her workup, she underwent cardiovascular arrest secondary to saddle pulmonary embolus requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. After systemic and catheter directed thrombolysis, and a long hospitalization, she was discharged home in stable condition.

Conclusion

Saddle pulmonary embolus is a potentially catastrophic and fatal postoperative complication. This case demonstrates a successful implementation of directed thrombolysis, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and multidisciplinary management in a case of postoperative saddle pulmonary embolus.

Précis

We report a case of an endometrial cancer patient who sustained a massive postoperative pulmonary embolus and was successfully resuscitated using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

•

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can help stabilize patients with massive embolus.

•

Catheter directed alteplase may reduce risk of bleeding compared to systemic therapy.

•

A multidisciplinary approach to massive saddle embolus may improve patient outcomes.

Analysis of preoperative blood platelet parameters in terms of diversity of epithelial ovarian cancer

Smouldering inflammation, thrombocytosis, and platelet hyper-reactivity are linked to malignancy. The relationships between preoperative diagnostic blood morphology parameters and cancer have been the focus of much interest, because some of these parameters are correlated with advanced cancer stages and poor patient survival rates. This study aimed to perform an observational, retrospective analysis of the intradiversity of blood platelet parameters in patients with different International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages and different histological types of epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOC), and also an analysis of the overall survival rate.In all, 94 EOC patients were included in this analysis (23 mucinous, 33 serous, 20 undifferentiated, 14 endometrioid, and 4 clear cell carcinoma cases). Peripheral blood samples were collected and analyzed before drug or surgical treatment.The platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (PNR) was related to the histological type of EOC, particularly mucinous carcinoma. In patients with mucinous cancer, the PNR was significantly lower compared with patients with nonmucinous cancer, and this parameter distinguished between mucinous and nonmucinous groups of patients (area under receiver-operating characteristic [ROC] curve 0.721 ± .056; sensitivity 82.6%; specificity 61%; P < .001; ROC analysis), regardless of the FIGO stage. Moreover, elevated PNR values were correlated with lower survival rate of EOC patients.The reduced PNR, similar to the lower level of cancer antigen 125, is characteristic for mucinous ovarian carcinoma patients. Moreover, elevated PNR index might correlate with poor survival of patients.

Underutilization of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in obstetrics and gynaecology patients in the absence of a risk assessment tool

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine the risk factors for developing venous thromboembolism and to evaluate adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines among patients hospitalized in Obstetrics and Gynaecology units.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted from December 2015 to March 2016 in the haematology department of a teaching hospital. A total of 188 hospitalized female patients with a hospital length of stay greater than 1 day were included. Patient data were reviewed to assess the risk score for developing venous thromboembolism by an independent expert haematologist. Patients eligible for thromboprophylaxis were compared to patients who had already received thromboprophylaxis.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients were included, with age ranging from 17 to 81 years. Of these, 61% percent (n = 116) were gynaecological patients, while the remainder were pregnant women admitted to the obstetrics ward (38%, n = 72). Based on independent expert decision, 54% of gynaecological patients and 37% of obstetrics patients were eligible for thromboprophylaxis; however, only 48% of gynaecological and 26% of obstetrics patients were given thromboprophylaxis by their treating physician.

CONCLUSIONS

Venous thromboembolism is associated with substantial mortality and is largely preventable. Our study reports underutilization of thromboprophylaxis in clinical practice. Different modalities are necessary to improve adherence to thromboprophylaxis, such as implementation of a risk stratification tool at the time of hospital admission.