Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Endometrium: Evaluation of Prognostic Parameters in a Multi-institutional Cohort of 165 Cases

Comparison of survival and complications between minimally invasive and open staging surgeries in non-endometrioid endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare survival and complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery and evaluate related risk factors in patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic characteristics; survival outcomes; complications; and prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival and overall survival were compared among patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent primary staging surgery using laparoscopic, robotic, or open abdominal surgery (2004-2017).

RESULTS

In total, 91 patients were included: 41 and 50 underwent minimally invasive surgery and open surgery, respectively. The minimally invasive surgery and open surgery groups showed similar progression-free survival (5-year progression-free survival rate, 58.7 % vs. 58.5 %; P = .925) and overall survival (5-year overall survival rate, 73.6 % vs. 80.3 %; P = .834). Intraoperative (7.2 % vs. 6.0 %; P = .111) and postoperative surgical complications (14.6 % vs. 26.0 %; P = .165) were similar between the groups. However, blood loss was lower (mean, 305.1 vs. 561.2 ml, P < .001) and hospital stay was shorter (mean, 8.2 vs. 15.4 days, P < .001) in the minimally invasive surgery group. Using multivariate analysis, lymphovascular space invasion was identified as poor prognostic factor for progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.054; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.521-6.132; P = .002) and overall survival (adjusted HR, 3.918; 95 % CI, 1.455-10.551; P = .007), whereas age ≥ 60 years was poor prognostic factor for only overall survival (adjusted HR, 5.0953; 95 % CI, 1.660-15.378; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical outcomes did not differ between the minimally invasive and open surgery group in patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. Lymphovascular space invasion was a significant survival factor in this context.

Immunohistochemical Analysis of the Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor-2 in Endometrial Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Single-center Retrospective Study

The tissue factor pathway inhibitor-2 (TFPI2) was recently identified as a diagnostic serum marker for ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Moreover, the immunohistochemical expression of TFPI2 in ovarian clear cell carcinoma was recently reported. This single-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate whether TFPI2 can be a specific biomarker for immunohistological diagnosis of endometrial clear cell carcinoma (ECCC). Immunohistochemical staining of TFPI2 in 55 endometrial carcinomas was evaluated at Nara Medical University Hospital. Thirteen ECCC samples were included as cases and 42 samples were included as a control (endometrioid carcinoma grade 1, 11 cases; grade 2, 11 cases; grade 3, 10 cases; serous carcinoma, 10 cases). The mean ± SD TFPI2 histoscore for diagnosing ECCC was 115.4 ± 87.9, which was significantly higher than that of non-ECCC (21.3 ± 45.9, P = 0.002). The best TFPI2 histoscore value obtained from the analyses of receiver operating characteristic curves for immunohistochemical diagnosis of ECCC was 15. With TFPI2 histoscores ≥15.0 as positive and <15.0 as negative, all 13 ECCC cases (100%) were positive for TFPI2, whereas 11 (26.2%) non-ECCC cases were positive for TFPI2. The sensitivity and specificity of TFPI2 for diagnosing ECCC were 100% and 73.8%, respectively. TFPI2 is expressed in ECCC and is useful for histopathological diagnosis.

Role of radiotherapy in the management of rare gynaecological cancers

There are a large number of gynaecological cancers with rare histologies, for which the available data are limited and usually retrospective. Because of their rarity and poor prognosis, the management of these cancers must be centralized in expert centres, for both histological diagnosis and treatment. With the exception of sarcomas, most endometrial or cervical cancers with rare histologies respond to the same radiation treatment modalities than cancers with more common histologies, although there are some specificities regarding treatments such as neuroendocrine carcinomas (chemotherapy with platinum and etoposide, major role of surgery). For localized or locally advanced ovarian cancer, external beam radiotherapy has a role in the management of hypercalcaemic small cell carcinoma of the ovary. This article summarizes the current role of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy in the management of cancers of the uterine cervix, uterine corpus and ovaries, with rare or very rare histologies, and with localized or locally advanced stages.

Identifying clinical features and molecular characteristics of the endometrial clear cell carcinoma

Objective

The aim of this study was to verify TCGA subtypes in endometrial clear cell carcinoma (ECCC) and determine their clinical and molecular characteristics.

Methods

We summarized and compared the clinical features of 28 clear cell carcinoma and 112 endometrioid carcinoma patients. Of the 28 ECCCs, 19 underwent TCGA classification, and other markers (ER, PR, ARID1A, ARIB1B, TAF1, and HER-2) were also detected by IHC, and outcomes were assessed.

Results

Compared to endometrioid carcinoma, ECCC had an older age of onset (median age, 64.5 years, range 31-81 years), higher rate of myometrial invasion (42.8% vs. 21.5% in endometrioid carcinoma), LVSI (33% vs. 16%), and more advanced FIGO stage. Among the ECCCs, LVSI was a poor prognostic factor. TCGA classification was performed for 19 ECCCs: two POLEmut cases (10.5%), three MMRd (15.8%), 11 p53wt (57.9%), and three p53abn (15.8%). Of the 19 ECCCs, six (31.6%) showed HER-2 positive expression, and eight (42.1%) had TAF1 expression loss. ECCCs possessed HER-2 and TAF1 expression had worse outcomes.

Conclusion

Our study summarized the clinical features of ECCC. The outcomes of patients with ECCC with TCGA subtypes differed from those of patients with endometrioid carcinoma. HER-2 and TAF1 may be new prognostic factors.

Pure and mixed clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: A molecular and immunohistochemical analysis study

BACKGROUND

Uterine clear cell carcinoma (CCC) consists of either pure clear cell histology but can also display other histological components (mixed uterine CCCs). In this study, the molecular and immunohistochemical background of pure and mixed uterine CCC was compared. Secondly, it was evaluated whether histological classification and molecular background affected clinical outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study was performed comparing pure uterine CCCs (n = 22) and mixed uterine CCCs (n = 21). Targeted next-generation sequencing using a 12-gene targeted panel classified cases as polymerase-ε (POLE) mutated, microsatellite instable (MSI), TP53 wildtype or TP53 mutated. Immunohistochemistry was performed for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, L1 cell adhesion molecule, MSH6, and PMS2.

RESULTS

The following molecular subgroups were identified for pure and mixed uterine CCCs, respectively: POLE mutated 0% (0/18) and 6% (1/18); MSI in 6% (1/18) and 50% (9/18); TP53 wildtype in 56% (10/18) and 22% (4/18); TP53 mutated in 39% (7/18) and 22% (4/18) (p = 0.013). Patients with mixed CCCs had improved outcome compared to patients with pure CCCs. Frequent TP53 mutations were found in pure CCCs and frequent MSI in mixed CCCs, associated with clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Pure and mixed uterine CCCs are two entities with different clinical outcomes, which could be explained by different molecular backgrounds. These results underline the relevance of both morphological and molecular evaluation, and may assist in tailoring treatment.

Breast metastasis from endometrial clear cell carcinoma: A case report and review of the literature

Metastasis to the breast from extra-mammary malignancies are rare, accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancers. Endometrial cancer, a common gynecological malignancy, often spreads to the pelvis, abdominal lymph nodes, peritoneum or the lungs. Endometrial metastasis to the breast is extremely rare, and while there have been isolated case reports of endometrial serous carcinoma with breast metastasis, it has not been reported in the case of clear cell carcinoma. We present a rare case of a 70 year old Chinese lady who had a metastatic endometrial clear cell carcinoma with metastasis to the breast, mimicking an inflammatory breast cancer clinically. We reviewed the current literature and describe the challenges in differentiating primary from metastatic breast lesions, as well as clinical, radiological and histopathological features that may help to differentiate the two. Tumour metastasis to the breast via lymphatic or hematogenous route can affect their radiological features: the former mimicking inflammatory breast cancer and the latter with features similar to benign breast lesions. Regardless, histological features with immunohistochemical staining is still the gold standard in diagnosing metastatic breast lesions and determining their tissue of origin. Breast metastases from extra-mammary malignancies are uncommon and it is even rarer for endometrial clear cell carcinoma to spread to the breast. Nonetheless, this case highlights the importance of keeping an open mind and engaging a multidisciplinary team for the care of complex patients.

Adjuvant Therapy in Node-Positive Endometrial Cancer: A Focus on Chemotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In advanced-stage and high-risk endometrial cancer, adjuvant treatment is the standard of care and typically includes chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Debate continues over the optimal use of these two treatment modalities together or separately. This review covers the historical literature leading to the current recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy, in addition to looking forward to the relatively new field of targeted molecular treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The review covers recent phase III trials comparing chemotherapy to radiotherapy in high-risk endometrial cancer. Additionally, the era of genomic medicine has a new foothold in endometrial cancer, and the review covers new discoveries on molecular classification and prognostic implications. Fortunately, the majority of endometrial cancer has a good prognosis. For advanced-stage and high-risk histologies, the prognosis can be guarded, with adjuvant treatment improving outcomes. Gynecologic oncologists continue to debate the optimal treatment modality/modalities, a debate which will likely become more robust as the field of molecular treatment in endometrial cancer evolves.

Factors That Affect Survival Outcomes in Patients with Endometrial Clear Cell Carcinoma

Background: Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is a rare aggressive histologic subtype of endometrial cancer with a high relapse rate. In the present study, we sought to evaluate the prognostic factors of disease relapse and overall survival. Methods: We conducted retrospective cohort studies that included endometrial CCC patients treated at our institution. Predictive variables of survival outcomes were evaluated considering factors that determine the survival of patients with endometrioid carcinoma. Results: Fifty-five patients with a median age of 68 years and a median follow-up period of 31 months were included in the present study. Recurrence-free and overall survival rates did not differ among patients with early-stage and advanced-stage disease (RFS HR 1.51 (95% CI 0.63, 3.61), OS HR 1.36 (0.56, 3.31)). Patients with upper abdominal metastases had significantly shorter progression-free and overall survival intervals (log-rank < 0.001). The Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon analysis indicated worse survival rates for patients with advanced disease (p = 0.040); however, the log-rank test that gave equal weight to all time points did not reveal significant differences (log-rank = 0.576). Conclusion: Clear cell carcinoma is an aggressive histologic subtype of endometrial cancer that seems to be moderately affected by known predictors of survival rates in endometrioid carcinoma patients, except for the disease stage. Further research is needed to evaluate whether the molecular profiling of these patients may help predict survival outcomes.

A comparative analysis of MRI findings in endometrial cancer: differentiation between endometrioid adenocarcinoma, serous carcinoma, and clear cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To assess the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of endometrial cancers and to reveal the differences between endometrioid carcinoma (EC), serous carcinoma (SC), and clear cell carcinoma (CCC).

METHODS

In this study, 274 consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed endometrial cancer (231 ECs, 25 SCs, and 18 CCCs) who underwent MRI before hysterectomy were enrolled. MRI images were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the three pathologies.

RESULTS

The maximum diameters (55.6 ± 34.7 vs. 39.3 ± 21.6 vs. 39.4 ± 26.8 mm) (p < 0.05) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (1.11 ± 0.21 vs. 0.84 ± 0.17 vs. 0.86 ± 0.16 × 10-3 mm2/s) (p < 0.01) were significantly greater in CCCs than in ECs and SCs, respectively. Infiltrative growth pattern (33% vs. 6%) (p < 0.01) was more frequent in CCCs than in ECs. Peritoneal dissemination (16% vs. 0%) (p < 0.01) and heterogeneous signal on diffusion-weighted (61% vs. 32%) (p < 0.05) images were more frequent in SCs than in ECs, respectively. Abnormal ascites (12% vs. 11% vs. 0%) and heterogeneous signal on T1-weighted (28% vs. 50% vs. 9%), T2-weighted (64% vs. 72% vs. 36%), and fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (80% vs. 90% vs. 46%) images were more frequent in SCs and CCCs than in ECs, respectively (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

SCs frequently exhibited a heterogeneous signal with peritoneal dissemination and abnormal ascites. Alternatively, CCCs tended to have a larger tumor size and higher ADC values with an infiltrative growth pattern, heterogeneous signal, and abnormal ascites.

KEY POINTS

• SCs tend to have a heterogeneous signal intensity with peritoneal dissemination and abnormal ascites compared to ECs. • CCCs tend to have a heterogeneous signal intensity with an infiltrative growth pattern and abnormal ascites compared to ECs. • CCCs have a larger tumor size and higher ADC values compared to ECs and SCs.

Systematic Lymphadenectomy and Oncological Outcomes of Women With Apparent Early-Stage Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Endometrium: A Multi-Institutional Cohort Study

Objective

The survival value of systematic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer is ambiguous and controversial. The current study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival role of combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with presumed early-stage clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium.

Methods

Patients in three Chinese teaching hospitals who presented between 2012 and 2017 with apparent early-stage clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium and underwent surgical staging were selected. Patients who did and did not undergo systematic lymphadenectomy were identified and clinicopathological characteristics were compared. Disease-free survival and overall survival were evaluated following the generation of the Kaplan-Meier curves and the comparison using the log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was employed to control for confounders.

Results

A total of 244 patients underwent systematic lymphadenectomy and 89 did not receive lymph node dissection. The demographic and baseline data were comparable between the two groups. The rate of disease-free survival at 5 years was 64.10% in patients who underwent systematic lymphadenectomy and 45.05% in patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy. Patients who underwent systematic lymphadenectomy had better disease-free survival than those who did not receive lymphadenectomy (HR, 0.54. 95% CI, 0.38-0.76. P=0.000). The rate of 5-year overall survival was 68.87% in the lymphadenectomy group and 53.33% in patients who did not undergo systematic lymphadenectomy. Systematic lymphadenectomy was also associated with improved 5-year overall survival for women with presumed early-stage clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium (HR, 0.58. 95% CI, 0.39-0.85. P=0.005). After adjusting for confounders, systematic lymphadenectomy was still independently associated with improved disease-free survival and overall survival.

Conclusion

Patients with apparent early-stage clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium who underwent systematic lymphadenectomy had better long-term survival than those who did not undergo systematic lymphadenectomy.

Prognostic factors in clear cell carcinoma of endometrium: analysis of 55 cases

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and pathologic prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the endometrium.

METHODS

A retrospective review of fifty-five patients with endometrial clear cell carcinoma were collected.

RESULTS

The median overall and disease-free survivals were 40 and 20 months, respectively. A univariate analysis was performed with respect to stage of disease, age, lymph nodes status, myometrium invasion, lymph vascular space invasion and adjuvant therapy. Stage was found to be the only important prognostic factor related to survival. In fact, early stage had a median survival of 77 months compared to 34 months in the advanced disease (p<0.04). These differences remained significant after adjusting for single stage (stage III versus IV).    Conclusions: Endometrial CCC is a rare histotype. Advanced stage disease is considered a poor prognostic factor. Recurrences are high even in early stage. Randomized clinical trials are needed.

Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Endometrium: Evaluation of Prognostic Parameters in 27 Cases

Objective

Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the endometrium is an uncommon yet aggressive tumor. Few cohort studies are reporting the overall survival time of CCC patients. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the clinicopathologic features, molecular characteristics and survival data of 27 endometrial CCC patients to improve the understanding of CCC.

Methods

The clinicopathologic features, molecular characteristics and survival data total of 27 CCC patients admitted to the BBMU affiliated hospital (Anhui, China) between January 2005 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the prognosis-related factors.

Results

The median age of the patients was 60 years (range; 39 to 81 years). The average tumor size was 3.8 cm (range; 0.8 to 13.0cm). Myometrial infiltration greater than 50% was reported in 55.6% of the patients, while the Ki-67 index greater than 50% was reported in 70.4% of the patients. The patients’ FIGO (2009) surgical stages were as follows: 18 I, 3 II, 4 III, and 2 IV. Besides, 7 (25.6%) patients had lymphovascular invasion, 3 (11.1%) patients with distant metastasis, including 1 patient with bone metastasis, and 2 with liver metastasis. Adjuvant treatment included 7 with chemotherapy alone, 9 with radiotherapy alone, and 9 with both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The median overall survival time from the time of CCC diagnosis was 56 months. ER and PR showed negative expression and P16 showed patchy immunostaining. 18 (63%) cases showed Napsin A positive expression. Loss of MSH2, MSH6 and PTEN were seen in 5, 4 and 7 cases respectively. All cases showed HER-2/nue negative expression.

Conclusion

CCC is a rare and invasive tumor. Age of diagnosis, FIGO stage, tumor size, myometrial infiltration, lymphovascular invasion, distant metastasis, Ki-67 index and P53 expression are important indicators to evaluate patient’s prognosis (P = 0.048, P < 0.001, P = 0.016, P = 0.043, P = 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.026, and P = 0.007, respectively). CCC has a worse prognosis than endometrioid carcinoma (P = 0.002), and there is no significant difference when compared with uterine papillary serous carcinoma (P = 0.155).

High-grade endometrial carcinomas: Morphologic spectrum and molecular classification

High-grade endometrial carcinoma (HGEC) is a heterogeneous group of tumors with various morphologic, genetic, and clinical characteristics. Morphologically, HGEC includes high-grade endometrioid carcinoma, serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma, and carcinosarcoma. The morphologic classification has been used for prognostication and treatment decisions. However, patient management based on morphologic classification is limited by suboptimal interobserver reproducibility, variable clinical outcomes observed within the same histotype, and frequent discordant histotyping/grading between biopsy and hysterectomy specimens. Recent studies from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network established four distinct molecular subtypes: POLE-ultramutated, microsatellite unstable, copy number high, and copy number low groups. Compared to histotyping, the TCGA molecular classification appears superior in risk stratification. The best prognosis is seen in the POLE-ultramutated group and the worst in copy number high group, while the prognosis in the microsatellite unstable and copy number low groups is in between. The TCGA subtyping is more reproducible and shows a better concordance between endometrial biopsy and resection specimens. It has now become apparent that the molecular classification can supplement histotyping in patient management. This article provides an overview of the pathologic diagnosis/differential diagnosis of HGEC and the TCGA classification of endometrial cancers, with the clinical significance and applications of TCGA classification briefly discussed when appropriate.

Cervical cytology in the detection of uterine clear cell carcinoma: Diagnostic predictors from a case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Uterine clear cell adenocarcinoma (CCC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. The present study aimed to identify and describe its characteristic morphological features in cervical cytology.

METHODS

This was a 3-year retrospective case-control study. Cases included cervical samples of histopathologically proven endometrial and cervical CCC. Controls included cervical samples of histopathologically proven endometrial serous carcinoma (n = 15), endometrioid adenocarcinoma (n = 20), and endocervical adenocarcinoma (n = 15). Twenty-eight cytomorphological features were evaluated; the strength of association was determined by odds ratio (OR) and Cramer's V, and the diagnostic accuracy of statistically significant features was assessed.

RESULTS

Cases consisted of histopathologically proven 25 (34.7%) endometrial and 13 (18.0%) cervical CCC. Corresponding cervical samples were available for a total of 14 (36.8%) patients, of which 13 (92.8%) were positive for epithelial cell abnormality. On univariate analysis, three cytomorphological variables were significant predictors of uterine CCC: presence of dense cytoplasm (OR = 88; V = 0.72), deep nuclear membrane irregularities (OR = 17.5; V = 0.55), and coarse chromatin (OR = 21.3; V = 0.46). Dense cytoplasm had the highest positive predictive value (92%) and high specificity (97.8%), whereas coarse chromatin had the highest sensitivity (92.3%) and negative predictive value (96.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of dense cytoplasm and deep nuclear membrane irregularities in the tumour cells were strong predictors, and coarse chromatin a moderate predictor, of uterine CCC compared to its close cytological mimics.

Adjuvant and post-surgical treatment in endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) usually presented as a localized disease at diagnosis (67%), 20% of patients diagnosed with regional spread, and distant metastasis accounted for 9%. The standard treatments include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic with/without paraaortic lymph node dissection/biopsy. Adjuvant therapy is arranged according to risk factors and stages. Risk group classification varied among different guidelines and studies and evolved with time. Adjuvant modalities include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, antiangiogenesis agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and multi-target agents. We review the recent literature to incorporate important advances in trial results, real-world big data, and knowledge in biomarkers of EC to update appropriate adjuvant therapy and post-surgical treatment of EC patients.

Revisiting Glycogen in Cancer: A Conspicuous and Targetable Enabler of Malignant Transformation

Once thought to be exclusively a storage hub for glucose, glycogen is now known to be essential in a range of physiological processes and pathological conditions. Glycogen lies at the nexus of diverse processes that promote malignancy, including proliferation, migration, invasion, and chemoresistance of cancer cells. It is also implicated in processes associated with the tumor microenvironment such as immune cell effector function and crosstalk with cancer-associated fibroblasts to promote metastasis. The enzymes of glycogen metabolism are dysregulated in a wide variety of malignancies, including cancers of the kidney, ovary, lung, bladder, liver, blood, and breast. Understanding and targeting glycogen metabolism in cancer presents a promising but under-explored therapeutic avenue. In this review, we summarize the current literature on the role of glycogen in cancer progression and discuss its potential as a therapeutic target for cancer treatment.

Uterine clear cell carcinoma risk in White versus non-White US subpopulations: does race matter?

OBJECTIVE

To determine incidence rates of uterine clear cell carcinoma among non-White US subpopulations.

METHODS

Data from the United States Cancer Statistics and National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016 were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 488,811 women were diagnosed with uterine cancer from 2004-2016. Of these, 73.3% were endometrioid, 6.6% were serous, 5.3% were carcinosarcoma, 1.4% were clear cell, and 13.4% were other. Blacks had the highest incidence rate of uterine clear cell compared with Whites, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and American Indian/Alaska Natives (0.59 vs. 0.31, 0.29, and 0.24, respectively). Overall mean age at diagnosis was 68.6 years, with the youngest age in Asian/Pacific Islanders compared to Whites, Blacks, and American Indian/Alaska Natives (65.9 vs. 68.7, 68.6, and 66.3 years, respectively). Analysis of the Asian subpopulation revealed significantly younger age at diagnosis in Vietnamese women (55.8 years) compared with 72.4 years in Japanese, 68.6 years in Pacific Islander, 66.6 years in Indian/Pakistani, 65.9 years in Filipino, 65.8 years in Chinese, 65.2 years in Korean, and 63.7 years in other Asians.

CONCLUSIONS

Black women are two times more likely to be diagnosed with uterine clear cell carcinoma compared with other races. Asians present at younger ages, with Vietnamese women most likely to be diagnosed at the youngest age.

Napsin-A Expression, a Reliable Immunohistochemical Marker for Diagnosis of Ovarian and Endometrial Clear Cell Carcinomas

Background & Objective:

Clear cell carcinomas (CCC) differ from other types of ovarian and endometrial carcinomas in biology, behavior and response to chemotherapy. Histopathologic diagnosis may be challenging in some situations which necessitates immunohistochemistary (IHC) assessment. In this study we investigated the diagnostic utility of Napsin-A in diagnosis of ovarian and endometrial CCCs.

Methods:

Ovarian and endometrial CCC samples from 2013 to 2018 in 3 general and women’s hospital in Tehran were re-evaluated by 2 expert pathologists. Forty-two samples were included as case and 42 non-clear cell carcinomas (Non-CCC) of ovary and endometrium were selected as control group. Based on IHC study tumors with sum intensity and percentage score ≥2 (at least 1+ staining in more than 1% of tumor cells) were considered positive.

Results:

The prevalence of endometrial and ovarian CCC in the case group were 15 and 27 respectively. The tumors in the control group included 22 cases of endometrioid, 2 high grade papillary serous carcinoma (HGSC) of endometrium, 6 endometrioid and 12 HGSC of ovary. Napsin-A positivity was observed in 35 (83%) of CCCs while 7 (17%) samples including 3 out of 15 endometrial and 4 out of 27 ovarian CCCs were Napsin-A negative. No positive reaction was seen in control group. The overall accuracy, specifity and sensitivity of Napsin-A for diagnosis of ovarian and endometrial CCCs were 83%, 100% and 83%, respectively. Sensitivity for ovarian and endometrial CCCs were 85% and 80%, orderly.

Conclusion:

Napsin-A is an accurate and reliable marker for distinction of CCCs from non-CCCs in ovary and endometrium. A panel of antibodies may yield the highest diagnostic accuracy.

Clinicopathologic features and treatment in patients with early stage uterine clear cell carcinoma: A 16-year experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinicopathologic factors and adjuvant treatment effects on recurrence free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in early stage uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC).

METHODS

Our retrospective review included central pathology confirmed stage I or II UCCC treated and/or followed between 2000 and 2016. Cases with pure or mixed histology with >50% UCCC were included. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regressions.

RESULTS

112 women were identified. Median age was 65.5 years (range 34-94). Most patients had mixed UCCC (61%), while 39% had pure UCCC. The majority of patients had stage IA UCCC (66%) versus stage IB (15%) or stage II (18%) disease. Adjuvant treatment included chemotherapy + radiation (26%), brachytherapy (27%), whole pelvic radiation (15%), chemotherapy alone (8%), and observation (24%). Thirty-eight (34%) women had recurrent disease. Median RFS was 4.32 years (95% CI 2.77-5.78). On multivariate analysis, age ≥70 (HR 2.48, 95% 1.28-4.81) and positive LVSI (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.15-4.18) were associated with shorter RFS. Median OS was 9.8 years (95% CI 7.46-15.93). On multivariate analyses, age ≥70 (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.64-7.74) and positive LVSI (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.12-5.37) were associated with shorter OS. In this retrospective descriptive uncontrolled patient series, adjuvant treatment type did not impact RFS or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

OS approaches 10 years for early stage UCCC patients. Women ≥70 years have worse PFS and OS regardless of treatment modality, encouraging consideration of quality of life implications when electing for adjuvant therapy.

National patterns of care and cancer-specific outcomes of adjuvant treatment in patients with serous and clear cell endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate outcomes of adjuvant therapy for serous and clear cell endometrial carcinoma, as prior studies are limited by sample size and/or patient heterogeneity. National guidelines permit substantial variations in treatment, suggesting the need for additional data.

METHODS

Patients with FIGO stages I-III serous or clear cell uterine carcinoma who underwent at least total hysterectomy were identified in SEER-Medicare. Adjuvant external beam radiation, brachytherapy, and chemotherapy were determined using SEER fields and Medicare claims. The primary outcome was death from endometrial cancer (cancer-specific mortality [CSM]) evaluated using Gray's test (univariable analysis, UVA) and Fine-Gray regression (multivariable analysis, MVA).

RESULTS

A total of 1789 patients (1437 serous, 352 clear cell) were identified. In stages I-II patients (n = 1188), brachytherapy was significant for survival in UVA (P = 0.03) and MVA (P = 0.02). Additionally, in the subset with serous histology (n = 947), chemotherapy was also significant in UVA (P = 0.002) and approached significance in MVA (P = 0.05). The 4-year CSM for stages I-II serous cancers was 25% without brachytherapy or chemotherapy, 15% with one, and 9% with both (P ≤ 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). In stage III patients (n = 601), chemotherapy was significant in UVA (P = 0.002) and MVA (P = 0.006). Most (81%) patients underwent lymph node dissection, which predicted lower CSM in stage III (P = 0.001) but not stages I-II patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest brachytherapy benefits stages I-II serous/clear cell cancers, chemotherapy benefits stage III serous/clear cell cancers, and both chemotherapy and brachytherapy benefit stages I-II serous cancers.