1
|
Alhowimel AS, Ogbeivor C, Alruwaili AD, Morizn OM, Aljamaan A, Alenazi AM, Alhwoaimel NA, Alshehri MM, Alqahtani BA, Alodaibi FA. Validation of the Arabic Version of the Attitude Toward Education and Advice for Low Back Pain Questionnaire. Patient Prefer Adherence 2024; 18:999-1007. [PMID: 38779555 PMCID: PMC11108754 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s449265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This cross-sectional study aimed to validate the Arabic version of the Attitude toward Education and Advice for Low Back Pain (AxEL) Questionnaire. Patients and Methods This study was conducted in two phases. First, the AxEL questionnaire was translated into Arabic and cross-culturally adapted. Second, the psychometric properties (such as validity) of the translated AxEL were evaluated. Results The results showed that back translators and language specialists had no trouble translating the AxEL. The translators' agreement was very high (88.2%), and the questionnaire items were logically and clearly translated from English into Arabic. Conclusion The Arabic version of AxEL is a valid tool that can assess individuals' beliefs and attitudes towards low back pain (LBP). It fills a significant void in cross-cultural research and can help healthcare providers understand the attitudes and beliefs influencing individuals' management of LBP within the Arabic context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed S Alhowimel
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Collins Ogbeivor
- Department of Physical Rehabilitation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Omar M Morizn
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulaziz Aljamaan
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Aqeel M Alenazi
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Norah A Alhwoaimel
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Bader A Alqahtani
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faris A Alodaibi
- Department of Rehabilitation Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chew MT, Ilhan E, Nicholson LL, Kobayashi S, Chan C. An online pain management program for people with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome or hypermobility spectrum disorder: a three-staged development process. Disabil Rehabil 2024:1-11. [PMID: 38738812 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2351180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD) are painful, chronic and multi-systemic conditions. No online pain management programs for hEDS/HSD currently exist. We aimed to develop one by exploring what people with hEDS/HSD want in such programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS A Delphi was conducted via online surveys of stakeholders: participants with hEDS/HSD and healthcare professionals (HCP). In survey 1, participants were asked if a hEDS/HSD-specific online pain management program was important, listing up to 20 topics important to know about pain. In survey 2, participants rated the importance of those topics. Consensus was set as ≥75% rating of at least "important". Using topics that reached consensus, the online program was developed. Usability testing was performed using the Systems Usability Scale (SUS). RESULTS 396 hEDS/HSD and 29 HCP completed survey 1; 151 hEDS/HSD and 12 HCP completed survey 2. 81% of hEDS/HSD and 69% of HCP rated a hEDS/HSD-specific program as at least "important". Thirty-five topics reached consensus to guide content for the HOPE program (Hypermobile Online Pain managemEnt). SUS score was 82.5, corresponding to "high acceptability". CONCLUSIONS A hEDS/HSD-specific online pain management program is important to stakeholders. Utilising a Delphi approach to incorporate stakeholder input, an evidence-informed and user appropriate program was developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Tze Chew
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Emre Ilhan
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Leslie L Nicholson
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah Kobayashi
- Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Cliffton Chan
- Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mardon AK, Chalmers KJ, Heathcote LC, Curtis LA, Freedman L, Malani R, Parker R, Neumann PB, Moseley GL, Leake HB. "I wish I knew then what I know now" - pain science education concepts important for female persistent pelvic pain: a reflexive thematic analysis. Pain 2024:00006396-990000000-00547. [PMID: 38452219 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Pain science education (PSE) provides people with an understanding of "how pain works" grounded in the biopsychosocial model of pain; it has been demonstrated to improve outcomes in musculoskeletal pain conditions. Preliminary evidence suggests PSE may be effective for female individuals with persistent pelvic pain, but how the content of PSE needs to be modified for this group remains to be determined. A reflexive thematic analysis of qualitative data was performed to identify PSE concepts that female individuals with persistent pelvic pain consider important and why. Twenty individual, semistructured interviews were conducted with adult females who had engaged with PSE and had self-identified as having "improved" pelvic pain. Most participants had been diagnosed with endometriosis (n = 16). Four themes were generated capturing PSE concepts considered important by female individuals with "improved" pelvic pain: (1) "A sensitised nervous system leads to overprotective pain" validated their pelvic pain as being real; (2) "Pain does not have to mean the body is damaged (although sometimes it does)" provided reassurance that pelvic pain does not mean their condition is worsening; (3) "How I think, feel, and 'see' my pain can make it worse" enabled participants to find optimal ways to manage their pain; and (4) "I can change my pain… slowly" provided hope that pelvic pain can improve and empowered them to pursue pain improvement as a viable goal. This study generated 4 PSE learning concepts that were important to female individuals with improved pelvic pain and may be incorporated into PSE curricula for female individuals with pelvic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia K Mardon
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- The Pain Education Team Aspiring Learning (PETAL) Collaboration
| | - K Jane Chalmers
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- The Pain Education Team Aspiring Learning (PETAL) Collaboration
| | - Lauren C Heathcote
- The Pain Education Team Aspiring Learning (PETAL) Collaboration
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lee-Anne Curtis
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Rinkle Malani
- MGM School of Physiotherapy, Aurangabad, A Constituent Unit of MGMIHS, Maharashtra, India
| | - Romy Parker
- The Pain Education Team Aspiring Learning (PETAL) Collaboration
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Patricia B Neumann
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - G Lorimer Moseley
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- The Pain Education Team Aspiring Learning (PETAL) Collaboration
| | - Hayley B Leake
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- The Pain Education Team Aspiring Learning (PETAL) Collaboration
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gomes LA, Rodrigues AM, van der Windt D, Pires D, Afreixo V, Canhão H, Cruz EB. Minimal Intervention of Patient Education for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024; 54:1-13. [PMID: 37970797 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of minimal intervention of patient education (MIPE) for reducing disability and pain intensity in patients with low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases from inception to May 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials comparing MIPE, consisting of a single session of patient education, to no or other interventions in patients with LBP. DATA SYNTHESIS: Random effects meta-analysis was conducted where possible. A noninferiority margin of 5 points (0-100 scale) was considered for noninferiority hypotheses. We assessed risk of bias using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2), and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. RESULTS: A total of 21 trials were included. There were no differences between MIPE and no intervention for effects on disability and pain intensity. There was low-certainty evidence that MIPE had inferior effects on short-term disability (mean difference = 3.62; 95% CI: 0.85, 6.38; 15 trials; n = 3066; I2 = 75%) and pain intensity (mean difference = 9.43; 95% CI: 1.31, 17.56; 10 trials; n = 1394; I2 = 90%) than other interventions. No differences were found for subsequent time points. CONCLUSION: As an intervention delivered in isolation, and without tailoring (ie, one-size-fits-all intervention), MIPE on average did not provide benefits for reducing disability and pain intensity over no or other interventions. We encourage clinicians to consider using additional/other or more tailored treatments when helping people manage LBP. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(2):1-13. Epub 16 November 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11865.
Collapse
|
5
|
Heiberg BD, Ris I, Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Myburgh C, Kongsted A. The GLA:D BACK self-management adherence and competence checklist (SMAC Checklist)-Development, content validity and feasibility. Br J Health Psychol 2023; 28:1052-1075. [PMID: 37183956 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To unpack the complexity and impact of self-management interventions targeting musculoskeletal health conditions, we need to learn more about treatment delivery in clinical settings. Fidelity evaluation can illuminate how complex treatments are delivered and help understand the elements that lead to the effect. The objective of this study was to develop a checklist for the evaluation of the clinicians' delivery of structured patient education and exercise intervention for people with persistent back pain, the GLA:D Back intervention. The intent was to provide a checklist adaptable for the general delivery of self-management interventions for musculoskeletal pain. METHODS We derived items for the treatment delivery fidelity checklist from behaviour change techniques and theory about communication style. We applied a three-step developmental process covering developing a preliminary fidelity intervention framework, validating checklist content and piloting and refining the checklist. RESULTS We developed the adaptable fidelity checklist, The GLA:D BACK Self-management Adherence and Competence Checklist (SMAC Checklist). Evaluation of clinical practice using the checklist was feasible and acceptable by clinicians. Preliminary results indicate satisfactory observer agreement during pilot testing of the checklist. CONCLUSION The GLA:D BACK Self-management Adherence and Competence Checklist is a fidelity measurement tool for the assessment of the delivery of a self-management supportive intervention for people with persistent back pain. The intention is that it can be useful as an adaptable tool for use across self-management interventions for musculoskeletal pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bibi Dige Heiberg
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Inge Ris
- Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Henrik Hein Lauridsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Corrie Myburgh
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Murphy DR, Justice BD, Borkan J. Using medical storytelling to communicate problems and solutions in the low back pain conundrum: an evidence-based tale of twins. Chiropr Man Therap 2023; 31:25. [PMID: 37553703 PMCID: PMC10410981 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00499-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low back pain (LBP) is the number one cause of disability world-wide. It is also the most expensive area in healthcare. Patient-centered innovations are needed. This paper uses medical storytelling to illustrate the common problems that often lead to unnecessary suffering for patients, and costs to society. We present innovative solutions, including narrative interventions. METHODS We use medical storytelling to present a scenario in which hypothetical twin patients with identical LBP episodes enter the healthcare system, with one twin managed in an appropriate manner, and the other inappropriately. RESULTS One twin becomes a chronic LBP sufferer, while the other experiences quick resolution, despite identical conditions. Recommendations are made to de-implement inappropriate action and to implement a more productive approach. CONCLUSIONS Many patients with LBP descend into chronic pain. This is rarely inevitable based on clinical factors. Much of chronic LBP results from how the condition is handled within the healthcare system. Medical narrative may be one innovation to illustrate the problem of current LBP management, recommend solutions and foster changes in clinical behavior. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS The starkly different outcomes for each identical twin are illustrated. Recommendations are made for reframing the situation to de-implement the inappropriate and to implement a more appropriate approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald R Murphy
- Department of Family Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 133 Dellwood Road, Cranston, RI, 02920, USA.
| | - Brian D Justice
- Excellus BlueCross BlueShield, 165 Court Street, Rochester, NY, 14647, USA
| | - Jeffrey Borkan
- Department of Family Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 111 Brewster St, Pawtucket, RI, 02860, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
O'Hagan ET, Cashin AG, Traeger AC, McAuley JH. Person-centred education and advice for people with low back pain: Making the best of what we know. Braz J Phys Ther 2023; 27:100478. [PMID: 36657216 PMCID: PMC9868342 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The first-line treatment consistently recommended for people with low back pain is patient education and advice. Regardless of the duration of low back pain, clinicians should provide education on the benign nature of low back pain, reassurance about the absence of a serious medical condition, and advice to remain active. There is little guidance on how best to provide this care. OBJECTIVE This Masterclass will draw on recent evidence to explore how physical therapy clinicians could deliver person-centred education and advice to people with low back pain to refine their clinical consultation. DISCUSSION First, we highlight the potential value of providing validation to acknowledge the distressing experience and consequences of low back pain. Second, we describe a tool to open channels of communication to provide education and advice in a patient-centred and efficient way. Clinicians could consider using the Attitude toward Education and advice for Low back pain Questionnaire to gain an insight into patient attitudes toward education and advice at the outset of a clinical encounter. Finally, we provide options for tailoring patient education and advice to promote self-management of low back pain based on patient attitudes. We present evidence that a positive attitude toward messages about causes rather than messages about physical activity predicts intention to self-manage low back pain. We combine this evidence to suggest a pathway for clinicians to provide education and advice to people with low back pain within the time constraints of a clinical consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edel T O'Hagan
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Aidan G Cashin
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adrian C Traeger
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James H McAuley
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alamam D, Alrushud A, Alodaibi F, Alhowimel A, Almarzouq R, Alangari R, Khunain SB, Alosaimi W, Almoheidib S. Reassurance regarding educational messages in people with non-specific low back pain: A cross-sectional study. Musculoskeletal Care 2022; 20:937-944. [PMID: 35962533 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES Educational messages related to Low back pain (LBP) are often contradictory and drive maladaptive beliefs, as they conflict with the latest research evidence. This study aims to examine participants' reassurance levels in relation to educational messages regarding LBP among the Saudi population with the condition compared to those without it, and to assess the association between levels of reassurance and fear avoidance. METHODS A list of 13 educational messages about LBP was generated from LBP-educational resources in Saudi Arabia, and from expert consensus on a set of evidence-based key messages for people with LBP. Consented respondents with LBP of various durations and those without the condition completed a questionnaire containing questions on demographic characteristics, the absence or presence of LBP and its intensity, and the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ). We also asked them to rate their level of perceived reassurance regarding the educational messages using a Likert-type scale from 0 to 10. RESULTS Participants (n = 1652) reported that the 13 educational messages had reassured them about LBP. However, there was no significant difference between participants with and without LBP (p ≥ 0.05). There was an overall weak association between the responses to the 13 educational messages and the fear-avoidance questionnaire. However, reassurance levels regarding most of the educational messages were negatively associated with the FABQ. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION We demonstrate that people with and without LBP need reassurance about the condition. Furthermore, we show that as reassurance increases, fear-avoidance decreases, confirming the complex nature of LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalyah Alamam
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Asma Alrushud
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faris Alodaibi
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Alhowimel
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Raghad Almarzouq
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Raneem Alangari
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sara Bin Khunain
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Waad Alosaimi
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sara Almoheidib
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leake HB, Mardon A, Stanton TR, Harvie DS, Butler DS, Karran EL, Wilson D, Booth J, Barker T, Wood P, Fried K, Hayes C, Taylor L, Macoun M, Simister A, Moseley GL, Berryman C. Key Learning Statements for persistent pain education: an iterative analysis of consumer, clinician and researcher perspectives and development of public messaging. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 23:1989-2001. [PMID: 35934276 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
Over the last decade, the content, delivery and media of pain education have been adjusted in line with scientific discovery in pain and educational sciences, and in line with consumer perspectives. This paper describes a decade-long process of exploring consumer perspectives on pain science education concepts to inform clinician-derived educational updates (undertaken by the authors). Data were collected as part of a quality audit via a series of online surveys in which consent (non-specific) was obtained from consumers for their data to be used in published research. Consumers who presented for care for a persistent pain condition and were treated with a pain science education informed approach were invited to provide anonymous feedback about their current health status and pain journey experience 6, 12 or 18 months after initial assessment. Two-hundred eighteen consumers reported improvement in health status at follow-up. Results of the surveys from three cohorts of consumers that reported improvement were used to generate iterative versions of 'Key Learning Statements'. Early iteration of these Key Learning Statements was used to inform the development of Target Concepts and associated community-targeted pain education resources for use in public health and health professional workforce capacity building initiatives. Perspective This paper reflects an explicit interest in the insights of people who have been challenged by persistent pain and then recovered, to improve pain care. Identifying pain science concepts that consumers valued learning provided valuable information to inform resources for clinical interactions and community-targeted pain education campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley B Leake
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Centre for Impact, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Amelia Mardon
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Tasha R Stanton
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Daniel S Harvie
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - David S Butler
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Emma L Karran
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Dianne Wilson
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - John Booth
- Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Trevor Barker
- Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Lived experience advocate, Yorta Yorta Land, Australia
| | - Pene Wood
- Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; School of Molecular Sciences, College of Science, Health & Engineering, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria
| | - Kal Fried
- Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Rehabilitation Medicine Group, Boonwurrung Land, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chris Hayes
- Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Hunter Integrated Pain Service, Awabakal Land, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, Australia
| | - Lissanthea Taylor
- Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Brain Changer, Canberra, Australia; Parkway Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Melanie Macoun
- Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Australian Capital Territory Pain Centre, Ngunnawal Country, Canberra, Australia
| | - Amanda Simister
- Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Persistent Pain Clinic, Shoalhaven District Memorial Hospital, Nowra, Australia
| | - G Lorimer Moseley
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Carolyn Berryman
- IIMPACT in Health, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Pain Revolution, Kaurna Country, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; School of Biomedicine, Kaurna Country, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
O'Hagan ET, Di Pietro F, Traeger AC, Cashin AG, Hodges PW, Wand BM, O'Neill S, Schabrun SM, Harris IA, McAuley JH. What messages predict intention to self-manage low back pain? A study of attitudes towards patient education. Pain 2022; 163:1489-1496. [PMID: 34784310 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This observational study evaluated people's attitudes towards educational statements and tested whether this predicted intention to self-manage low back pain (LBP). People with or without LBP who were older than 18 years and fluent in written English were recruited. Participants completed an online survey asking demographic questions and questions on the presence or absence of LBP, its duration, and intensity. We assessed attitude toward educational statements and conducted linear regression analyses to investigate the relationship between attitude toward each statement and intention to self-manage. We recruited 656 participants, n = 345 (53.6%), with LBP of varying duration. On average, participants had a positive attitude toward all statements except one; participants with chronic LBP had a negative attitude toward a statement relating to the cause of LBP. The effect of attitude on intention to self-manage was dependent on whether someone had LBP and for how long. For example, increased intention to self-manage was predicted by a positive attitude toward educational statements related to staying active (β = 0.22 [CI 0.11-0.33]) in participants without pain, statements about reassurance (β = 0.33 [CI 0.16-0.49]) for participants with acute or subacute LBP, and statements about the severity of back pain (β = 0.25 [CI 0.18-0.33]) for participants with chronic LBP. We noted differences in attitude toward educational messages and individuals' intention to self-manage LBP depending on pain duration. Self-management could be encouraged with specific reassurance in people with acute or subacute LBP and education about severity in people with chronic LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edel T O'Hagan
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Flavia Di Pietro
- Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Adrian C Traeger
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aidan G Cashin
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul W Hodges
- NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury & Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Benedict M Wand
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Midwifery and Health Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sean O'Neill
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, Liverpool Hospital, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Siobhan M Schabrun
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian A Harris
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, Liverpool Hospital, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James H McAuley
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Adams AMN, Chamberlain D, Thorup CB, Grønkjær M, Conroy T. Ethical and feasible stakeholder engagement in guideline development. Collegian 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
12
|
Di Donato M, Iles R, Buchbinder R, Xia T, Collie A. Prevalence, Predictors and Wage Replacement Duration Associated with Diagnostic Imaging in Australian Workers with Accepted Claims for Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2022; 32:55-63. [PMID: 33913056 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-021-09981-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To determine in Australian workers with an accepted workers' compensation claim for low back pain (LBP) (1) the prevalence of diagnostic imaging of the spine and factors associated with its use, and (2) the association between spinal diagnostic imaging events and wage replacement duration. Methods Workers with accepted workers' compensation claims for LBP longer than 2 weeks were grouped by whether workers' compensation funded no, single, or multiple diagnostic spinal imaging in the 2 years since reported LBP onset. Ordinal logistic regression was used to define the demographic, occupational and social factors associated with each group. Time-to-event analysis was used to determine the association between spinal imaging and wage replacement duration. Results In the sample of 30,530 workers, 9267 (30.4%) received single spinal imaging and 6202 (20.3%) received multiple spinal imaging. Male workers and workers from the state of Victoria had significantly higher odds of multiple imaging. Socioeconomically advantaged workers and workers from remote Australia had significantly lower odds of multiple imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging was the most common imaging modality. Workers with single spinal imaging (median duration 17.0 weeks; HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.9, 2.1) and multiple spinal imaging (median duration 49.0 weeks; HR 4.0, 95% CI 3.9, 4.1) had significantly longer wage replacement duration than those with no imaging (median duration 6.1 weeks). Conclusions Over half of Australian workers with an accepted workers' compensation claim for LBP longer than 2 weeks received diagnostic spinal imaging. Receipt of diagnostic imaging, particularly multiple imaging, was associated with longer wage replacement duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Di Donato
- Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
| | - Ross Iles
- Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, 4 Drysdale St, Malvern, VIC, 3144, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 4 Drysdale St, Malvern, VIC, 3144, Australia
| | - Ting Xia
- Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Alex Collie
- Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
[Patient education for acute low back pain : Contents of pain education in patients with acute non-specific low back pain - a scoping review]. Schmerz 2022; 36:266-271. [PMID: 35133466 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-022-00622-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the review is to map the content of intervention education in people with acute nonspecific lumbar low back pain (LBP) to make it available in a synopsis. BACKGROUND In the care of people with acute non-specific LBP, education is recommended as an elementary treatment component. However, the proposed content is proving to be heterogenic and the question arises as to how education should be designed in the future. METHOD A systematic literature search and content analysis of studies with content on pain education was conducted as part of a scoping review. Inclusion criteria were: provision of relevant information on the content of pain education, patients with acute nonspecific low back pain, 18 years or older, publication in English or German. The search was conducted in the Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PEDro databases and supplemented by a hand search. The search was completed in February 2021. RESULTS A total of 4239 hits were identified, of which 90 studies were included. A wide range of content was found and clustered into ten categories. The most frequent statements were in the categories "recommendations for dealing with LRS," "education, reassuring aspects, and relieving basic messages," and "information and recommendations about medications." CONCLUSION The teaching of pathoanatomical information can potentially trigger or increase anxiety and worry, whereas information on neurophysiological mechanisms of pain development and processing is more likely to have an anxiety-reducing effect. The results can contribute to the design of the intervention in different settings.
Collapse
|
14
|
O'Hagan ET, Skinner IW, Jones MD, Karran EL, Traeger AC, Cashin AG, Wand BM, Schabrun SM, O'Neill S, Harris IA, McAuley JH. Development and measurement properties of the AxEL (attitude toward education and advice for low-back-pain) questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2022; 20:4. [PMID: 35012565 PMCID: PMC8744221 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01908-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Clinician time and resources may be underutilised if the treatment they offer does not match patient expectations and attitudes. We developed a questionnaire (AxEL-Q) to guide clinicians toward elements of first-line care that are pertinent to their patients with low back pain. Methods We used guidance from the COSMIN consortium to develop the questionnaire and evaluated it in a sample of people with low back pain of any duration. Participants were recruited from the community, were over 18 years and fluent in English. Statements that represented first-line care were identified. Semantic scales were used to measure attitude towards these statements. These items were combined to develop the questionnaire draft. Construct validity was evaluated with exploratory factor analysis and hypotheses testing, comparing to the Back Beliefs Questionnaire and modified Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Reliability was evaluated and floor and ceiling effects calculated. Results We recruited 345 participants, and had complete data for analysis for 313 participants. The questionnaire draft was reduced to a 3-Factor questionnaire through exploratory factor analysis. Factor 1 comprised 9 items and evaluated Attitude toward staying active, Factor 2 comprised 4 items and evaluated Attitude toward low back pain being rarely caused by a serious health problem, Factor 3 comprised 4 items and evaluated Attitude toward not needing to know the cause of back pain to manage it effectively. There was a strong inverse association between each factor and the Back Beliefs Questionnaire and a moderate positive association with the modified Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Each independent factor demonstrated acceptable internal consistency; Cronbach α Factor 1 = 0.92, Factor 2 = 0.91, Factor 3 = 0.90 and adequate interclass correlation coefficients; Factor 1 = 0.71, Factor 2 = 0.73, Factor 3 = 0.79. Conclusion This study demonstrates acceptable construct validity and reliability of the AxEL-Q, providing clinicians with an insight into the likelihood of patients following first-line care at the outset. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-021-01908-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edel T O'Hagan
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), 139 Barker Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia. .,Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Ian W Skinner
- School of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew D Jones
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), 139 Barker Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Emma L Karran
- IIMPACT in Health, UniSA: Allied Health and Human Performance, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Adrian C Traeger
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Aidan G Cashin
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), 139 Barker Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Benedict M Wand
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Midwifery and Health Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
| | - Siobhan M Schabrun
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), 139 Barker Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Sean O'Neill
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, Liverpool Hospital, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian A Harris
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, Liverpool Hospital, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James H McAuley
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), 139 Barker Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Myburgh C, Larsen TB, Kjaer P. 'When the picture does not really tell the story'- A qualitative exploration of the MRI report of findings as a means for generating shared diagnostic meaning during the management of patients suffering from persistent spinal pain. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:221-227. [PMID: 34001396 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) feedback report as a health care encounter for generating shared diagnostic meaning. METHODS An exploratory, qualitative case study was conducted using video observation of the MRI report of findings, individual face-to-face and telephonic interviews. RESULTS From fourteen distinct encounters, three key themes emerged, these being: 'a powerful shared experience, 'a legacy of biomedical thinking' and 'clinical practice quandaries'. Generally speaking, the MRI encounter was observed to be both an effective and satisfying method for developing shared diagnostic meaning. However, in instances where a structure-based diagnosis could not be reasonably established, clinicians experienced doubts in what to present in a 'soft report'. A feature of these was the communication of speculative causal feedback, based on non-visualised structures and/or incidental findings observed. CONCLUSION Shared diagnostic meaning can result from a 'soft' MRI report of findings. However, the emergence of diagnostic closure is not guaranteed. Further exploration of this phenomenon in the context of shared decision making and the therapeutic alliance is warranted. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Pre-feedback peer conferences might be considered in order to standardise the information communicated to patients. Clinicians might also consider limiting the MRI scan as a visual aid in 'soft' reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corrie Myburgh
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
| | - Trine Boye Larsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Per Kjaer
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK 5230 Odense M, Denmark; Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Niels Bohrs Alle 1, DK 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Culture and musculoskeletal pain: strategies, challenges, and future directions to develop culturally sensitive physical therapy care. Braz J Phys Ther 2022; 26:100442. [PMID: 36209626 PMCID: PMC9550611 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain experience has a multidimensional nature. Assessment and treatment recommendations for pain conditions suggest clinicians use biopsychosocial approaches to treat pain and disability. The current pain research is overwhelmingly skewed towards the study of biological and psychological factors including interventions, whereas, cultural factors are often ignored. OBJECTIVE The aims of this Masterclass is threefold: (1) to discuss cultural influences on pain, (2) to provide strategies for delivering appropriate pain education and exercises in culturally diverse people with chronic pain, and (3) to present challenges and future directions to clinicians and researchers. DISCUSSION Cultural factors have a relevant influence on the way individuals experience and manage health and illness. Thus, people with different cultural experience perceive, respond, communicate and manage their pain in different ways. In this aspect, the contents of pain education should be presented using different culturally appropriate examples, metaphors, images, and delivery methods that may enhance the impact of the message. Efforts should be made to produce and spread culturally adapted evidence-based materials and resources. In addition, a culturally sensitive approach may help to introduce patients to graded activities, so that they can apply these strategies in culturally acceptable and meaningful ways. Future studies should investigate the effectiveness of culturally-adapted interventions in pain-related outcomes in different pain conditions in patients with different cultural backgrounds.
Collapse
|
17
|
Leake HB, Moseley GL, Stanton TR, O'Hagan ET, Heathcote LC. What do patients value learning about pain? A mixed-methods survey on the relevance of target concepts after pain science education. Pain 2021; 162:2558-2568. [PMID: 33960326 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Pain education is a popular treatment approach for persistent pain that involves learning a variety of concepts about pain (ie, target concepts), which is thought to be an important part of recovery. Yet, little is known about what patients value learning about pain. A mixed-methods survey was conducted to identify pain concepts that were valued by people with persistent pain who improved after a pain science education intervention. An online survey was distributed to 123 people who were treated for persistent pain with a pain science education approach; responses of participants who self-identified as "improved" were analysed. Open-ended survey questions were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and close-ended questions were analysed for frequency of responses. Each question-type was analysed separately, before integration for complementarity. We analysed the data of 97 participants. We constructed 3 themes from the open-ended questions. Pain does not mean my body is damaged (theme 1) captured the importance of abandoning preexisting ideas that pain indicated damage. Thoughts, emotions and experiences affect pain (theme 2) captured the value of recognising multifactorial influences on pain. I can retrain my overprotective pain system (theme 3) captured the importance of conceptualising pain as a heightened protective response that could be lessened. Responses from close-ended questions confirmed that the target concepts represented by these themes are among those most valued, although divergence with the qualitative data suggests differences between patient and clinician language. These data offer patient-centred conceptualizations and language that could assist in further refining pain education interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley B Leake
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - G Lorimer Moseley
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tasha R Stanton
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Edel T O'Hagan
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lauren C Heathcote
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Knezevic NN, Candido KD, Vlaeyen JWS, Van Zundert J, Cohen SP. Low back pain. Lancet 2021; 398:78-92. [PMID: 34115979 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00733-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 405] [Impact Index Per Article: 135.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Low back pain covers a spectrum of different types of pain (eg, nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic, or non-specific) that frequently overlap. The elements comprising the lumbar spine (eg, soft tissue, vertebrae, zygapophyseal and sacroiliac joints, intervertebral discs, and neurovascular structures) are prone to different stressors, and each of these, alone or in combination, can contribute to low back pain. Due to numerous factors related to low back pain, and the low specificity of imaging and diagnostic injections, diagnostic methods for this condition continue to be a subject of controversy. The biopsychosocial model posits low back pain to be a dynamic interaction between social, psychological, and biological factors that can both predispose to and result from injury, and should be considered when devising interdisciplinary treatment plans. Prevention of low back pain is recognised as a pivotal challenge in high-risk populations to help tackle high health-care costs related to therapy and rehabilitation. To a large extent, therapy depends on pain classification, and usually starts with self-care and pharmacotherapy in combination with non-pharmacological methods, such as physical therapies and psychological treatments in appropriate patients. For refractory low back pain, a wide range of non-surgical (eg, epidural steroid injections and spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain, and radiofrequency ablation and intra-articular steroid injections for mechanical pain) and surgical (eg, decompression for neuropathic pain, disc replacement, and fusion for mechanical causes) treatment options are available in carefully selected patients. Most treatment options address only single, solitary causes and given the complex nature of low back pain, a multimodal interdisciplinary approach is necessary. Although globally recognised as an important health and socioeconomic challenge with an expected increase in prevalence, low back pain continues to have tremendous potential for improvement in both diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Future research on low back pain should focus on improving the accuracy and objectivity of diagnostic assessments, and devising treatment algorithms that consider unique biological, psychological, and social factors. High-quality comparative-effectiveness and randomised controlled trials with longer follow-up periods that aim to establish the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of low back pain management are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
- Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Kenneth D Candido
- Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Johan W S Vlaeyen
- Research Group Health Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Research Group Experimental Health Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; TRACE Center for Translational Health Research, KU, Leuven-Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - Jan Van Zundert
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA; Neurology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA; Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Anesthesiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hodges PW, Hall L, Setchell J, French S, Kasza J, Bennell K, Hunter D, Vicenzino B, Crofts S, Dickson C, Ferreira M. Effect of a Consumer-Focused Website for Low Back Pain on Health Literacy, Treatment Choices, and Clinical Outcomes: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e27860. [PMID: 34128822 PMCID: PMC8277358 DOI: 10.2196/27860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The internet is used for information related to health conditions, including low back pain (LBP), but most LBP websites provide inaccurate information. Few studies have investigated the effectiveness of internet resources in changing health literacy or treatment choices. Objective This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the MyBackPain website compared with unguided internet use on health literacy, choice of treatments, and clinical outcomes in people with LBP. Methods This was a pragmatic, web-based, participant- and assessor-blinded randomized trial of individuals with LBP stratified by duration. Participants were randomly allocated to have access to the evidence-based MyBackPain website, which was designed with input from consumers and expert consensus or unguided internet use. The coprimary outcomes were two dimensions of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (dimension 2: “having sufficient information to manage my health;” dimension 3: “actively managing my health;” converted to scores 1-100) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included additional Health Literacy Questionnaire dimensions, quality of treatment choices, and clinical outcomes. Results A total of 453 participants were recruited, and 321 (70.9%) completed the primary outcomes. Access to MyBackPain was not superior to unguided internet use on primary outcomes (dimension 2: mean difference −0.87 units, 95% CI −3.56 to 1.82; dimension 3: mean difference −0.41 units, 95% CI −2.78 to 1.96). Between-group differences in other secondary outcomes had inconsistent directions and were unlikely to be clinically important, although a small improvement of unclear importance in the quality of stated treatment choices at 1 month was found (mean difference 0.93 units, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.84). Conclusions MyBackPain was not superior to unguided internet use for health literacy, but data suggest some short-term improvement in treatment choices. Future research should investigate if greater interactivity and engagement with the website may enhance its impact. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12617001292369; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372926 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027516
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul William Hodges
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Leanne Hall
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jenny Setchell
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Simon French
- Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jessica Kasza
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kim Bennell
- Centre for Health Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Hunter
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The Kolling Institute, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bill Vicenzino
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Samuel Crofts
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chris Dickson
- Department of Integrative Medicine, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Manuela Ferreira
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The Kolling Institute, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Xie R, Xia Y, Chen Y, Li H, Shang H, Kuang X, Xia L, Guo Y. The RIGHT Extension Statement for Traditional Chinese Medicine: Development, Recommendations, and Explanation. Pharmacol Res 2020; 160:105178. [PMID: 32889127 PMCID: PMC7462769 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Nowadays, the number of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) guidelines is constantly increasing, but its reporting quality remains unsatisfactory. One of the main reasons is that there is a lack of suitable reporting standard to guide it. In response to this long-standing problem, the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) Working Group has invited a group of TCM clinical experts, methodologists and epidemiology, and developed the RIGHT Extension Statement for TCM (RIGHT-TCM) through a multi-staged development process, including systematic review, reporting quality evaluation and online Delphi expert consensus. The RIGHT-TCM extends two sections of the RIGHT Statement, includes basic information and recommendations section. Seven strong recommendation sub-items were added to RIGHT Statement and formed the final RIGHT-TCM. The group hopes that the RIGHT-TCM may assist TCM guideline developers in reporting guidelines, support journal editors and peer reviewers when considering TCM guideline reports, and help health care practitioners understand and implement a TCM guideline. This article will introduce its background, development, recommendations and explanation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Runsheng Xie
- Department of Standardization of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China
| | - Yun Xia
- Office of Academic Research, Hainan Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Haikou, China
| | - Yaolong Chen
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Standardization of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China.
| | - Hongcai Shang
- Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xinying Kuang
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Linjun Xia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Yi Guo
- College of acupuncture and massage, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
The Effects of a Pain Psychology and Neuroscience Self-Evaluation Internet Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin J Pain 2020; 36:683-692. [PMID: 32520816 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many patients' chronic musculoskeletal pain is strongly influenced by central nervous system processes such as sensitization or amplification. Education about pain neuroscience can change patients' beliefs but has less consistent effects on pain outcomes. Patients may have greater clinical benefits if the educational intervention is personalized, and they evaluate various psychosocial risk factors with respect to their pain. We developed and tested a brief, internet-based Pain Psychology and Neuroscience (PPN) self-evaluation intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS From a patient registry, 104 adults reporting chronic musculoskeletal pain were randomized to the PPN intervention or a matched, active, education control condition. At baseline and 1-month (primary endpoint) and 10-month follow-ups, participants reported pain severity (primary outcome) and multiple secondary outcomes. Primary analyses compared the 2 experimental conditions using analyses of covariances; post hoc exploratory analyses compared the effects of PPN in subgroups of patients who met criteria for fibromyalgia (FM; n=50) or who did not (n=54; primarily spinal pain). RESULTS At 1-month follow-up, compared with the control condition, PPN led to significantly lower pain severity (ηp =0.05) and interference (ηp =0.04), greater brain (ηp =0.07) and psychological (ηp =0.07) attributions for pain, and greater readiness for pain self-management (ηp =0.08). Effects on distress, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and life satisfaction were not significant. Exploratory analyses showed that the PPN intervention was especially beneficial for patients without FM but was of less benefit for those with FM. Most of the effects (except attributions) were lost at 10 months. DISCUSSION A brief PPN self-evaluation intervention, presented on-line, can yield short-term improvements in musculoskeletal pain severity and interference, especially for people with spinal/localized pain rather than FM, perhaps because the psychology/neuroscience perspective is more novel for such patients.
Collapse
|
22
|
Hodges PW, Setchell J, Nielsen M. An Internet-Based Consumer Resource for People with Low Back Pain (MyBackPain): Development and Evaluation. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2020; 7:e16101. [PMID: 32229467 PMCID: PMC7157509 DOI: 10.2196/16101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
People increasingly use the internet to obtain information about health complaints, including low back pain (LBP). LBP is the leading cause of disability internationally, and outcomes are worsening. There is an urgent need for resources that aid improvement of outcomes. There have been calls to engage consumers in the development of resources, but this has rarely been implemented. MyBackPain is a website that was developed with extensive involvement of consumers to ensure that the resource meets their needs for content and presentation. This paper aimed to describe the multistep process undertaken to develop the MyBackPain website and provide an extensive evaluation of its impact. Development of MyBackPain involved 10 steps, many of which have been published in the academic literature. These steps included consultation regarding consumer needs, evaluation of existing internet resources, identification of key messages to be reinforced, identification of frequently asked questions, consensus for content, content development (including development of algorithms to guide tailoring of the user experience), development of consumer-focused evidence-based treatment summaries, development of descriptions of health care providers, and testing. Evaluation included qualitative examination of people's interactions with the website and its effects on their daily lives and an ongoing randomized controlled trial of impact of use of the site on people's LBP-related health literacy, clinical outcomes, and treatment choices. It is hoped that the website can aid in the reduction of the massive burden of LBP and provide a template for the development of resources for other conditions.
Collapse
|