Impact of a policy change restricting access to codeine on prescription opioid-related emergency department presentations: an interrupted time series analysis

Wastewater-based evaluation of the efficacy of oxycodone regulations in Australia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Between 2018 and 2020, Australia implemented major policy changes to improve the quality and safety of opioid prescribing, with a specific focus on oxycodone. This study used wastewater-based epidemiology to assess the efficacy of Australia's regulatory reforms by measuring change in consumption of oxycodone via exploratory analysis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, MEASUREMENTS

Wastewater analysis data on oxycodone consumption was from the National Wastewater Drug Monitoring Program. The program captures data from more than 50 wastewater treatment plant catchments across Australia, equivalent to more than 50% of the national population. Geographic trend analyses were conducted for both major cities and regional areas within all states and territories of Australia over a 6-year period between 2017 and 2023.

FINDINGS

Oxycodone consumption showed a statistically significant increase nationally from 78 mg/day/1000 people (95% confidence interval [CI] = 71, 84) in 2017 to 120 mg/day/1000 people in August 2019 (95% CI = 110, 120), an increase of 52% (95% CI = 42, 62, P < 0.0001). From August 2019 to December 2020, there was a statistically significant decrease from 120 to 65 mg/day/1000 people (95% CI = 60, 71), a decrease of 45% (95% CI = 40, 51), followed by a modest 2.4% increase to the end of the study period in April 2023 (95% CI [2.0,2.7]).

CONCLUSIONS

A 45% reduction in oxycodone consumption in Australia from 2019 to 2020 coincided with national policy changes that aimed to reduce consumption of prescription opioids. The overall declining trend in consumption was suggestive of the effectiveness of national interventions in reducing pharmaceutical opioid use. Wastewater-based epidemiology provides an effective approach for assessing the effectiveness of controlled substances policy changes.

Patient motivators to use opioids for acute pain after emergency care

Introduction

Patients are stakeholders in their own pain management. Factors motivating individuals to seek or use opioids therapeutically for treatment of acute pain are not well characterized but could be targeted to reduce incident iatrogenic opioid use disorder (OUD). Emergency departments (EDs) commonly encounter patients in acute pain for whom decisions regarding opioid therapy are required. Decision-making is necessarily challenged in episodic, unscheduled care settings given time pressure, limited information, and lack of pre-existing patient provider relationship. Patients may decline to take prescribed opioids or conversely seek opioids from other providers or non-medical sources.

Methods

Using a framework analysis approach, we qualitatively analyzed transcripts from 29 patients after discharge from an ED visit for acute pain at a large, urban, academic hospital in the midwestern United States to describe motivating factors influencing patient decisions regarding opioid use for acute pain. A semi-structured interview guide framed participant discussion in either a focus group or interview transcribed and analyzed with conventional content analysis.

Results

Four major themes emerged from our analysis including a) pain management literacy, b) control preferences, c) risk tolerance, and d) cues to action.

Discussion

Our findings suggest targets for future intervention development and a framework to guide the engagement of patients as stakeholders in their own acute pain management.

Hospital admissions for paracetamol poisoning declined following codeine re-scheduling in Australia

BACKGROUND

Codeine was restricted to prescription only in Australia in 2018. This intervention aimed to reduce harms from codeine dependance and use, including toxicity from co-formulated paracetamol. We aimed to quantify the impact of this intervention on paracetamol poisoning hospital admissions in a national hospital admissions database.

METHODS

We analyzed the number of paracetamol overdoses resulting in hospital admissions from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Hospital Morbidity Database, January 2011 to June 2020. We used interrupted time series analysis to quantify the effect of codeine re-scheduling on the monthly number of paracetamol poisoning-related hospital admissions in Australia. We compared paracetamol poisonings with no opioid combinations, and poisonings with probable paracetamol-codeine combinations.

RESULTS

There was an immediate and sustained decrease (level shift) in the number of paracetamol poisoning-related hospital admissions following codeine re-scheduling (RR=0.85; 95% CI 0.80-0.89). This reduction was due to the decrease in poisonings with likely paracetamol-codeine combinations (RR=0.62; 95% CI 0.57-0.67) while there was no change in other paracetamol poisonings (RR=0.91; 95% CI 0.96-1.01).

CONCLUSION

Codeine re-scheduling in Australia appears to have reduced paracetamol poisoning-related hospital admissions.

Non-medical use of pharmaceutical opioids with and without other illicit substance use: Trends from two repeated nationally representative Australian surveys

Background

Due to concerns over the public health impact of increasing opioid use, Australia up-scheduled codeine in 2018, requiring codeine-containing pharmaceuticals to be prescription-only. We examined pre-post changes in the prevalence and correlates of non-medical use of pharmaceutical opioids (NMUPO) and other illicit substance use (ISU).

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 45,463 participants aged 14 or above in the Australian National Drug Strategy Household Surveys (NDSHS) 2016 and 2019. Participants were categorized based on their past 12 months NMUPO and ISU patterns. Correlates examined included socio-demographic, psychological (Kessler 10), health and behavioral variables.

Results

The overall prevalence of any NMUPO decreased from 3.56% in 2016 to 2.65% in 2019, and the prevalence of codeine use from 2.98% to 1.49%. No significant changes were observed in the use of other types of painkillers (e.g. oxycodone and fentanyl) between 2016 and 2019. The overall decrease in NMUPO primarily occurred among people who used NMUPO only and did not use other illicit drugs. Older adults were more likely to report NMUPO only. Younger age, higher psychological distress, risky alcohol use, and daily smoking were associated with both NMUPO and illicit drug use.

Conclusions

A comparison of cross-sectional data from two time-points showed that the prevalence of NMUPO use among people who used NMUPO exclusively was lower post-up-scheduling of codeine in Australia. However, NMUPO use did not reduce among people who used both NMUPO and other illicit drugs. Public health interventions are needed to reduce opioid-related harm in those who also used other illicit drugs.

An overview of the use and misuse/abuse of opioid analgesics in different world regions and future perspectives

Opioids are an important therapeutic option for severe resistant chronic pain but, in the absence of proper oversight, their use has risks. The level of prescription opioid misuse/abuse differs among countries, due to differences in healthcare systems and pain management approaches. However, evaluating the true dimension of prescription opioid misuse/abuse is complicated by statistical reporting which often does not differentiate between prescription and illicit opioid use, or between prescription opioid use by patients and nonpatients, highlighting a need for greater uniformity. Parallel efforts to educate patients and the general public about opioid risks, facilitate appropriate analgesic prescribing and identify alternative formulations or options to use instead of or with opioids, may contribute to optimizing prescription opioid use for pain management.

Changes in Single-Specialty Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Patterns in Response to Legislation: Single-Institution Analysis Over Time

OBJECTIVES

To determine changes in the prescriptions of postoperative opioids in response to Florida state legislation restricting the number of days for which these medications could be prescribed to 3 days in most circumstances or 7 days at provider discretion.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review was performed for all patients undergoing 7 common outpatient otolaryngology surgical procedures.

SETTING

Single-institution academic center in Florida.

METHODS

Query of the state's online prescription drug monitoring program was used to compare prescription habits 3 months before and after the law and then again 1 year later.

RESULTS

A total of 561 patients were identified meeting criteria. The number of days that opioids were prescribed decreased significantly, from 6.42 to 4.48 to 3.03 days. There was a significant decrease in the proportion of patients receiving any postoperative opioid prescription, from 0.80 to 0.52 to 0.32. The total morphine milligram equivalents prescribed decreased from 28.4 before the law to 18.4 at 1 year after.

CONCLUSIONS

Legislative restrictions on the length of opioid prescriptions were associated with significant decreases in the proportion of patients receiving any opioids, the number of days that opioids were prescribed, and the total morphine milligram equivalents 3 months after the law went into effect, with even more dramatic changes at the 1-year time point. We opine that these changes are due to providers learning that many procedures do not require postoperative opioids and therefore increasingly considering and utilizing nonopioid alternatives in this setting.