Vortioxetine Disposition in Obesity: Potential Implications for Patient Safety

The Role of Vortioxetine in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in General Hospital Psychiatry: A Case-Series and PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review of the Literature

Depressive symptoms are a customary finding in hospitalized patients, particularly those who are undergoing long hospitalizations, underwent major surgical procedures or suffer from high levels of multimorbidity and frailty. The patients included in this case series shared high degrees of frailty-complexity and were evaluated within the ordinary consultation and liaison psychiatry service of the University Hospital in Pisa, Italy, from September 2021 to June 2023. Patients were administered at least one follow-up evaluation after a week and before discharge. To relate this case series to the extant literature, a comprehensive systematic review of vortioxetine safety and efficacy was performed. None of the six patients included developed serious safety issues, but one patient complained of mild-to-moderate nausea for some days after the vortioxetine introduction. Five out of six patients exhibited at least a slight clinical benefit as measured by the clinical global impression scale. Of the 858 entries screened via Scopus and Medline/PubMed, a total of 134 papers were included in our review. The present case series provides preliminary evidence for vortioxetine's safety in this healthcare domain. The literature reviewed in this paper seems to endorse a promising safety profile and a very peculiar efficacy niche for vortioxetine in consultation and liaison psychiatry.

Effect of Vortioxetine in Comparison to Fluoxetine on Metabolic Parameters in Patients With Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating mood disorder that increases the risk of metabolic syndrome (MS), emphasizing the need for mental and physical health treatments. Although many studies have linked atypical antipsychotics to metabolic disturbances, there is limited evidence linking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use to MS. This study aimed to assess the risk of MS among patients with MDD who were administered vortioxetine and fluoxetine. Methodology This was a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted in the psychiatry department. Using computer-generated random numbers, the physician assigned fluoxetine 20 mg or vortioxetine 10 mg and recorded MS parameters at baseline and each visit (4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks). This study was registered with CTRI (CTRI/2021/07/034892). Results A total of 122 participants were allocated randomly to the following two groups: group A (n = 60) and group B (n = 62). An independent-sample t-test showed a significant improvement in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at week eight (p = 0.005), triglycerides (TGs) at week 16 (p = 0.005), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) at week 20 (p = 0.005), and waist circumference at week 24 (p = 0.005) in group A compared to group B. However, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were not significantly associated with either group (p = 0.126 and p = 0.793, respectively). Overall depression remission (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)) and medication adherence rating scale scores were similar between groups (p = 0.337 and 0.325, respectively). Furthermore, most adverse drug reactions were possibly associated with the study drugs. Conclusions In comparison to group B, group A showed significant improvements in FPG, HDL, and waist circumference more effectively; however, both groups led to higher TG levels, with non-significant numerical improvements observed in SBP and DBP in both groups. In addition, both treatment groups reduced the HAM-D score and had a similar MDD remission rate.

Effects of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Escitalopram Pharmacokinetics: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Changes in the gastrointestinal physiology after bariatric surgery may affect the pharmacokinetics of medications. Data on the impact of different surgical techniques on the pharmacokinetics of commonly prescribed antidepressants such as escitalopram are limited.

METHODS

This case-only prospective study investigated escitalopram-treated patients who underwent bariatric surgery at hospitals in Central Norway. Escitalopram concentrations were assessed using serial blood samples obtained during a dose interval of 24 hours preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months, postoperatively. The primary outcomes were changes in the area under the time-concentration curve (AUC 0-24 ) with secondary outcomes, including full pharmacokinetic profiling. We performed repeated-measures analysis of variance for the AUC 0-24 and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Escitalopram-treated obese patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (n = 5) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 4) were included. Compared with preoperative baseline, dose-adjusted AUC 0-24 values were within ±20% at all time points, postoperatively in the sleeve gastrectomy and oux-en-Y gastric bypass groups, with the largest changes occurring 1 month postoperatively (+14.5 and +17.2%, respectively). No statistically significant changes in any pharmacokinetic variables over time were reported; however, there was a trend toward increased maximum concentrations after surgery ( P = 0.069).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that bariatric surgery has no systematic effect on the pharmacokinetics of escitalopram. However, because of the substantial interindividual variation, therapeutic drug monitoring can be considered to guide postoperative dose adjustments.

Incomplete Data and Potential Risks of Drugs in People with Obesity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide examples of knowledge gaps in current pharmaceutical treatments for people with obesity and call for changes to regulatory and pharmaceutical clinical research requirements during the drug discovery and development process.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment of obesity and its comorbidities often require the use of prescription drugs, many of which have not been fully evaluated in people with obesity. Despite a growing body of research on this topic, the impact of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs is often under-studied by drug sponsors and regulators, and subsequently underappreciated by clinicians and caretakers. There are currently multiple opportunities for pharmaceuticals to include dosing information specifically for patients with obesity in order to ensure safety and efficacy of drugs in this population. Additionally, there are serious gaps between what is known about the effects of obesity on drug disposition and the current use of drugs according to drug prescribing information and clinical practice. There is currently no requirement to test drugs in people with obesity during the drug approval process, even when preliminary data suggests there may be altered kinetics in this population. The lack of information on the safe and effective use of drugs in people with obesity may be contributing to poorer health outcomes in this population.

Clinical Consequences of Altered Drug Disposition in Obesity: Call for Change

Obesity is a serious condition with many known comorbid conditions and other health risks. Despite the rising global rates of obesity, drug disposition in this population is typically understudied, which results in limited information guiding the use of drugs in patients with obesity. Presently, dosing adjustments for patients with obesity typically focus on addressing altered drug clearance with body size and are therefore limited to chronic dosing recommendations. These instructions are variable and rarely based on dedicated studies in people with obesity. This review briefly discusses the current clinical use of body measurements to guide chronic dosing instructions and highlights the need for obesity-specific dosing instructions when the half-life of a drug is prolonged (typically through increased volume of distribution) in people with obesity. Examples of drugs with apparent opportunities for either ramp-up, loading, or washout instructions for patients based on body mass index are identified, specifically for vortioxetine, posaconazole, and brexpiprazole. We call for inclusion of people with obesity in clinical studies as a special subpopulation during drug development and propose the use of body mass index to guide dosing decisions among these patients.

Estimation of Absolute and Relative Body Fat Content Using Noninvasive Surrogates: Can DXA Be Bypassed?

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning is used for objective determination of body composition, but instrumentation is expensive and not generally available in customary clinical practice. Anthropometric surrogates are often substituted as anticipated correlates of absolute and relative body fat content in the clinical management of obesity and its associated medical risks. DXA and anthropometric data from a cohort of 9230 randomly selected American subjects, available through the ongoing National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, was used to evaluate combinations of surrogates (age, height, total weight, waist circumference) as predictors of DXA-determined absolute and relative body fat content. Multiple regression analysis yielded linear combinations of the 4 surrogates that were closely predictive of DXA-determined absolute fat content (R2  = 0.93 and 0.96 for male and female subjects). Accuracy of the new algorithm was improved over customary surrogate-based predictors such as body mass index. However prediction of relative body fat was less robust (R2  less than 0.75), probably due to the nonlinear relation between degree of obesity (based on body mass index) and relative body fat. The paradigm was validated using an independent cohort from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, as well as two independent external subject groups. The described regression-based algorithm is likely to be a sufficiently accurate predictor of absolute body fat (but not relative body fat) to substitute for DXA scanning in many clinical situations. Further work is needed to assess algorithm validity for subgroups of individuals with "atypical" body construction.

Drug Disposition in Subjects with Obesity: The Research Work of Darrell R. Abernethy

In 1979, the late Dr. Darrell R. Abernethy and colleagues began a series of clinical studies aimed at understanding the pertinent determinants of drug distribution, elimination, and clearance in obesity, and how those variables are interconnected. The studies confirmed that volume of distribution (Vd) and clearance are the principal independent biological variables, which conjointly determine elimination half-life as a dependent variable. For drugs distributed by passive diffusion, their pharmacokinetic Vd - after correcting for plasma protein binding - was increased in obesity, depending in part on the physicochemical lipophilicity of the individual drugs, and the quantitative extent of obesity in overweight individuals. Across all studies, the ratio of mean clearance in obese divided by control groups had an overall median value of 1.21 (range: 0.75 to 3.11), indicating a small and variable effect of obesity on clearance, without clear directionality. Since drug clearance was not clearly related to lipophilicity or degree of obesity, the prolonged half-life of lipophilic drugs in obese patients was largely explained by the increased Vd. Dr. Abernethy further identified delayed attainment of steady-state after initiation of multiple-dose treatment, and delayed washout after termination of dosage, as potential clinical consequences of the extended half-life in obese persons. These consequences for specific drugs have been recently emphasized in contemporary studies of chronic dosage in subjects with obesity. Without data identifying an obesity-related change in clearance for a specific drug, maintenance doses (in milligrams) should be based on ideal weight rather than adjusted upward based on total weight. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Impact of Obesity on Brexpiprazole Pharmacokinetics: Proposal for Improved Initiation of Treatment

Brexpiprazole is an oral antipsychotic agent indicated for use in patients with schizophrenia or as adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder. As obesity (body mass index ≥35 kg/m² ) has the potential to affect drug pharmacokinetics and is a common comorbidity of both schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, it is important to understand changes in brexpiprazole disposition in this population. This study uses a whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to compare the pharmacokinetics of brexpiprazole in obese and normal-weight (body mass index 18-25 kg/m² ) individuals known to be cytochrome P450 2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs). The physiologically based pharmacokinetic simulations demonstrated significant differences in the time to effective concentrations between obese and normal-weight individuals within metabolizer groups according to the label-recommended titration. Simulations using an alternative dosing strategy of 1 week of twice-daily dosing in obese EMs or 2 weeks of twice-daily dosing in obese poor metabolizers, followed by a return to once-daily dosing, yielded more consistent plasma concentrations between normal-weight and obese patients without exceeding the area under the plasma concentration-time curve observed in the normal-weight EMs. These alternative dosing strategies reduce the time to effective concentrations in obese patients and may improve clinical response to brexpiprazole.

Vortioxetine in management of major depressive disorder - a favorable alternative for elderly patients?

Introduction: Depressive disorders are common in older patients, and their prevalence may reach up to 17.1%. Though for older adults, the initial recommended treatment is either life-review treatment or group cognitive-behavioral therapy, a combination of pharmacotherapy with interpersonal psychotherapy is also an option. There are many classes of antidepressants, and some meta-analyses suggest that the efficacy of different antidepressant groups is similar. Therefore, depression treatment in an elderly patient should consider preference, safety, and tolerability. Most reports suggest that SSRIs, such as citalopram, escitalopram, or sertraline, should be proposed as first-time medications.Areas covered: This article discusses the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of vortioxetine, emphasizing the observed differences, benefits, and risks for older patients. Vortioxetine - a multimodal antidepressant drug - was shown to be effective against major depressive disorders in both double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials and open-label studies.Expert opinion: Compared with commonly used antidepressants, vortioxetine appears to have unique properties that may be beneficial for elderly patients. Not only does it enhance cognitive function, but it also has a favorable safety profile.

Effect of lipophilicity on drug distribution and elimination: Influence of obesity

AIMS

For a given passively-distributed lipophilic drug, the extent of in vivo distribution (pharmacokinetic volume of distribution, V_d ) in obese individuals increases in relation to the degree of obesity. The present study had the objective of evaluating drug distribution in relation to in vitro lipophilicity, and the relative increase in V_d associated with obesity across a series of drugs.

METHODS

Cohorts of normal-weight control and obese subjects received single doses of drugs ranging from hydrophilic (acetaminophen, salicylate) to lipophilic (imipramine, verapamil). Lipid solubility was measured by the log-transformed values of the high-pressure liquid chromatographic (HPLC) retention index (Log₁₀ (HPLC)), and the octanol-water partition coefficient (LogP).

RESULTS

Among normal-weight controls, V_d normalized for protein binding was highly correlated with Log₁₀ (HPLC) (R² = .65) and with LogP (R² = .78). V_d of all drugs was increased in the obese cohort, but the relative increase (compared to controls) for individual drugs was disproportionately greater as lipid solubility increased. Since clearance was unrelated to lipophilicity, the increased V_d produced a parallel disproportionate increase in elimination half-life in the obese cohort that was associated with Log₁₀ (HPLC) (R² = .62).

CONCLUSION

Lipophilicity is a principal correlate of in vivo V_d , as well as the increased V_d of drugs in obese patients. The consequent prolongation of half-life in obesity has clinical safety implications in terms of delayed drug accumulation and washout during and after chronic dosage. The magnitude and importance of this effect for a given drug depends on the degree of obesity, as well as the lipid-solubility of the specific drug.

Body Mass Index as a Moderator of Treatment Response to Ketamine for Major Depressive Disorder

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and obesity commonly co-occur. We sought to assess the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the acute antidepressant effects of ketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

METHODS/PROCEDURES

Post hoc analyses were conducted from a multisite, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to assess the rapid-onset effects of intravenous ketamine. Patients (n = 99) were randomized to a single dose administration of ketamine 0.1 mg/kg (n = 18), ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (n = 20), ketamine 0.5 mg/kg (n = 22), ketamine 1.0 mg/kg (n = 20), or active placebo, midazolam 0.045 mg/kg (n = 19). Patients were stratified for BMI. For patients randomized to ketamine (n = 80), BMI was assessed as a continuous variable and also categorically (obese, overweight, not obese/overweight [reference]). The primary outcome measure was the change on the 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 24 hours after treatment. Outcomes at day 3 were also assessed.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

The 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale change scores at 24 hours were inversely associated with BMI (-0.28 ± 0.12, P = 0.02). With BMI operationalized categorically, both obese (-4.15 ± 1.41, P = 0.004) and overweight (-1.99 ± 1.14, P = 0.08) categories were inversely related to the 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale change score at 24 hours, statistically significant for the obese category, as compared with the reference group. Similar but weaker findings were observed at 72 hours after infusion.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Higher BMI and obesity were associated with a more robust acute antidepressant response to ketamine. This may have clinical relevance for a great number of patients who have both MDD and obesity.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01920555.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Drugs in Obese Pediatric Patients: How to Map Uncharted Clinical Territories

Clinicians are increasingly faced with challenges regarding the pharmacological treatment of obese pediatric patients. To provide guidance for these treatments, a better understanding of the impact of obesity on pharmacological processes in children is needed. Results on pharmacological studies in adults show however ambiguous patterns regarding the impact of obesity on ADME processes or on drug pharmacodynamics. Additionally, based on the limited research performed in obese pediatric patients, it becomes clear that findings from obese adults cannot be expected to always translate directly to similar findings in obese children. To improve knowledge on drug pharmacology in obese pediatric patients, studies should focus on quantifying the impact of maturation, obesity, and other relevant variables on primary pharmacological parameters and on disentangling systemic (renal and/or hepatic) and presystemic (gut and/or first-pass hepatic) clearance. For this, data is required from well-designed clinical trials that include patients with not only a wide range in age but also a range in excess body weight, upon oral and intravenous dosing. Population modelling approaches are ideally suitable for this purpose and can also be used to link the pharmacokinetics to pharmacodynamics and to derive drug dosing regimens. Generalizability of research findings can be achieved by including mechanistic aspects in the data analysis, for instance, using either extrapolation approaches in population modelling or by applying physiologically based modelling principles. It is imperative that more and smarter studies are performed in obese pediatric patients to provide safe and effective treatment for this special patient population.

Sustained Impairment of Lurasidone Clearance After Discontinuation of Posaconazole: Impact of Obesity, and Implications for Patient Safety

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

The antipsychotic agent lurasidone (Latuda®) is metabolized by Cytochrome P450-3A (CYP3A) enzymes. Coadministration with strong CYP3A inhibitors (such as ketoconazole, posaconazole, and ritonavir) is contraindicated due to the risk of sedation and movement disorders from high levels of lurasidone. This study evaluated the time-course of recovery from the posaconazole drug interaction, and the effect of obesity on the recovery process.

METHODS/PROCEDURES

Healthy normal-weight volunteers (n = 11, mean body mass index, BMI, = 23.1 kg/m) and otherwise healthy obese subjects (n = 13, mean BMI = 49.3 kg/m) received single doses of lurasidone in the baseline control condition, again during coadministration of posaconazole, and at 4 additional time points during the 2 weeks after posaconazole discontinuation.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

With posaconazole coadministration, lurasidone area under the concentration curve (AUC) increased by an arithmetic mean factor of 6.2 in normals, and by 4.9 in obese subjects. Post-treatment washout of posaconazole was slow in normals (mean half-life 31 hours), and further prolonged in obese subjects (53 hours). Recovery of lurasidone AUC toward baseline was correspondingly slow, and was incomplete. AUC remained significantly elevated above baseline both in normals (factor of 2.1) and obese subjects (factor of 3.4) even at 2 weeks after stopping posaconazole.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Product labeling does not address the necessary delay after discontinuation of a strong CYP3A inhibitor before lurasidone can be safely administered. We recommend requiring normal-weight and obese patients to limit the dosage of lurasidone, or undergo a washout period, for two and three weeks, respectively, after discontinuation of posaconazole.