Comparison of methods in the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in lung cancer

ALK Amplification and Rearrangements Are Recurrent Targetable Events in Congenital and Adult Glioblastoma

PURPOSE

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) aberrations have been identified in pediatric-type infant gliomas, but their occurrence across age groups, functional effects, and treatment response has not been broadly established.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We performed a comprehensive analysis of ALK expression and genomic aberrations in both newly generated and retrospective data from 371 glioblastomas (156 adult, 205 infant/pediatric, and 10 congenital) with in vitro and in vivo validation of aberrations.

RESULTS

ALK aberrations at the protein or genomic level were detected in 12% of gliomas (45/371) in a wide age range (0-80 years). Recurrent as well as novel ALK fusions (LRRFIP1-ALK, DCTN1-ALK, PRKD3-ALK) were present in 50% (5/10) of congenital/infant, 1.4% (3/205) of pediatric, and 1.9% (3/156) of adult GBMs. ALK fusions were present as the only candidate driver in congenital/infant GBMs and were sometimes focally amplified. In contrast, adult ALK fusions co-occurred with other oncogenic drivers. No activating ALK mutations were identified in any age group. Novel and recurrent ALK rearrangements promoted STAT3 and ERK1/2 pathways and transformation in vitro and in vivo. ALK-fused GBM cellular and mouse models were responsive to ALK inhibitors, including in patient cells derived from a congenital GBM. Relevant to the treatment of infant gliomas, we showed that ALK protein appears minimally expressed in the forebrain at perinatal stages, and no gross effects on perinatal brain development were seen in pregnant mice treated with the ALK inhibitor ceritinib.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support use of brain-penetrant ALK inhibitors in clinical trials across infant, pediatric, and adult GBMs. See related commentary by Mack and Bertrand, p. 2567.

Molecular and cytogenetic features of NTRK fusions enriched in BRAF and RET double-negative papillary thyroid cancer

Rare NTRK-driven malignant neoplasms can be effectively inhibited by anti-TRK agents. The discovery of NTRK1/2/3-rich tumours in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) patients is a precondition for the rapid identification of NTRK fusion tumours. Knowledge of NTRK gene activation is critical to accurately detect NTRK status. A total of 229 BRAF V600E-negative samples from PTC patients were analysed in this study. Break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was performed to detect RET fusion. NTRK status was analysed using FISH, DNA- and RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). In 128 BRAF and RET double-negative cases, 56 (43.8%, 56/128) NTRK rearrangement tumours were found, including 1 NTRK2, 16 NTRK1, and 39 NTRK3 fusions. Two novel NTRK fusions, EZR::NTRK1 and EML4::NTRK2, was found in the NTRK rearrangement tumors.Dominant break-apart and extra 3' signal patterns accounted for 89.3% (50/56) and 5.4% (3/56) of all NTRK-positive cases, respectively, as determined by FISH. In our cohort, there were 2.3% (3/128) FISH false-negative and 3.1% (4/128) FISH false-positive cases identified. NTRK fusions are highly recurrent in BRAF and RET double-negative PTCs. FISH or RNA-based NGS is a reliable detection approach. NTRK rearrangement can be precisely, rapidly, and economically detected based on the developed optimal algorithm.

Comparison of two immunohistochemical staining protocols for ALK demonstrates non-inferiority of a 5A4 clone-based protocol versus an ALK01 clone-based protocol for the diagnosis of ALK + anaplastic large cell lymphoma

Detection of ALK rearrangement and/or expression of the ALK protein is an essential component in the evaluation of many neoplasms. Variability has been reported in the ability of different antibody clones to detect ALK expression. The ALK01 clone is commonly used to detect ALK expression in ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK + ALCL). However, this clone has been shown to lack sensitivity when used for solid tumors. The aim of this study was to determine if our high-sensitivity 5A4-based immunohistochemistry protocol is non-inferior to our ALK01-based protocol for the detection of ALK expression in ALK + ALCL. To compare the two protocols, we stained tissue microarrays of 126 hematolymphoid neoplasms and an additional 21 primary cutaneous ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphomas with both protocols. All 28 ALK + ALCL samples that were positive for the ALK01 antibody were also positive for the 5A4 clone. Three cases on the tissue microarray that were negative with the ALK01 antibody were clearly positive with the 5A4 antibody. We subsequently stained whole tissue sections of these three cases with the ALK01 antibody and found that these three cases were indeed positive with the ALK01 protocol, suggesting that the absence of staining on the tissue microarray samples was due to a combination of sampling error as well as a dimmer signal with the ALK01 protocol. Our study demonstrates that our 5A4-based protocol is non-inferior to the ALK01 antibody for the diagnosis of ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma, thus allowing our laboratory to discontinue the use of the ALK01-based protocol.

Comparison between Immunocytochemistry, FISH and NGS for ALK and ROS1 Rearrangement Detection in Cytological Samples

The detection of ROS1 and ALK rearrangements is performed for advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Several techniques can be used on cytological samples, such as immunocytochemistry (ICC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and, more recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS), which is gradually becoming the gold standard. We performed a retrospective study to compare ALK and ROS1 rearrangement results from immunocytochemistry, FISH and NGS methods from 131 cytological samples. Compared to NGS, the sensitivity and specificity of ICC were 0.79 and 0.91, respectively, for ALK, and 1 and 0.87 for ROS1. Regarding FISH, the sensitivity and specificity were both at 1 for ALK and ROS1 probes. False-positive cases obtained by ICC were systematically corrected by FISH. When using ICC and FISH techniques, results are very close to NGS. The false-positive cases obtained by ICC are corrected by FISH, and the true-positive cases are confirmed. NGS has the potential to improve the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in cytological samples; however, the cost of this technique is still much higher than the sequential use of ICC and FISH.

Trends in Molecular Testing of Lung Cancer in Mainland People's Republic of China Over the Decade 2010 to 2019

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the People’s Republic of China. Targeted therapies for patients with lung cancer, which depend on accurate identification of actionable genomic alteration, have improved survival compared with previously available treatments. However, data on the types of molecular testing often used in the People’s Republic of China, and how they have changed over time, are scarce. We explored the overall landscape of molecular testing of lung cancer in mainland People’s Republic of China in the past decade.

Methods

We distributed a stratified random sampling survey of molecular testing to 49 hospitals from members of the Molecular Pathology Collaboration Group of Chinese Anti-Cancer Association which was weighted by the numbers of lung cancer cases in seven different geographic regions in mainland People’s Republic of China from 2010 to 2019. The questionnaire contained four parts for all respondents. The questionnaire ascertained the use of approved in vitro diagnostic (IVD) devices published by the Center for Medical Device Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration of the People’s Republic of China.

Results

A total of 226,227 NSCLC specimens were tested from 2010 to 2019 in the selected hospitals. The annual number of initiated molecular tests increased over time (p < 0.0001), with an average annual growth rate of 31.8%. A notable increase in the number of molecular tests occurred during 2014 and 2016, which coincided with the approval of the National Medical Products Administration to IVD devices. For the diagnosis of molecular subtypes, EGFR mutation testing was first conducted in year 2007, followed by ALK translocation testing in 2010 and ROS1 in 2011. For other rare genetic variations in NSCLC, BRAF mutation testing was first launched in 2012, MET exon 14 skipping mutation in 2014, HER2 exon 20 mutations in 2017, and RET translocation in 2015. A markedly uneven distribution was also observed in the geography of leading units with the largest number of leading units located in east People’s Republic of China (34.7%, 17 of 49) and the smallest number located in northwest People’s Republic of China (6.1%, 3 of 49). The growth trends we observed illustrate the progress and increasing capability of molecular testing of lung cancer achieved in mainland People’s Republic of China in the decade from 2010.

Conclusions

In the decade 2010 to 2019, progress and increased capability of molecular testing of lung cancer were achieved in mainland People’s Republic of China. Further efforts should address the clinical application of next-generation sequencing technology, rare genomic aberrations, and the balance between novel genomic testing techniques and the approval of IVD products.

Histologic and Molecular Characterization of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma With Discordant ROS1 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

INTRODUCTION

ROS1 immunohistochemical (IHC) positivity requires follow-up with confirmatory testing such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Identifying predictive characteristics of false positive ROS1 IHC cases could aid in optimizing testing algorithms, decrease testing costs and preserve tissue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective results were retrieved for 2054 patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma submitted to our laboratory for molecular testing. Reflex ROS1 FISH was done on all ROS1 immunoreactive cases using ROS1 D4D6 antibody. Staining intensity and histo-score was recorded for all ROS1 immunoreactive cases. Results of any additional molecular testing (KRAS, BRAF, EGFR, ALK FISH, RET FISH, MET FISH) were also tabulated.

RESULTS

ROS1 immunoreactivity was seen in 305/2054 (14.8%) cases. Immunoreactivity was weak in majority of the cases with only 4.6% cases having an histo-score >100 and 5.9% of cases had moderate staining intensity. FISH was negative in 99% (302/305) cases with any degree of IHC expression (discordant cases) while 3 cases were positive by FISH. Diffuse strong IHC staining in greater than 90% of the tumor was noted in 6 cases, 3 (0.98%) of which were confirmed to have ROS1 rearrangement by FISH. The discordant cases had significantly higher rates of EGFR mutations (P<0.0005) in comparison to ROS1 IHC negative cases, were seen more often in adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma (P<0.0005) with lepidic and acinar patterns, and more likely to occur in primary lung carcinomas (P<0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

False positive ROS1 immunoreactivity was very frequent, occurred more commonly in primary NSCLC cases with acinar and/or lepidic histologies and was more likely in EGFR mutated cases. Using higher positivity thresholds for ROS1 IHC and incorporating the histologic and molecular correlates into algorithmic strategies could result in increased specificity and clinical utility of ROS1 IHC assay.

Diagnosis of NUT Carcinoma Despite False-Negative Next-Generation Sequencing Results: A Case Report and Literature Review

Nuclear protein in testis (NUT) carcinoma (NC) is a poorly differentiated malignant tumor with a poor prognosis, which is caused by the NUTM1 gene rearrangement. Positive staining of NUT using immunohistochemistry (IHC) or gene rearrangement of NUTM1 revealed by genetic analysis, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or next-generation sequencing (NGS), are important strategies used for accurate diagnosis. In the current study, we present a case of NC in an 18-year-old man who had a chief complaint of nasal congestion, nasal bleeding, and anosmia. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a mass in the nasal cavity and nasal septum. The initial pathological diagnosis was basaloid squamous cell carcinoma. Based on the tumor location and abrupt keratinization, further genetic tests were performed, and NC was diagnosed using FISH, which was further verified by IHC. However, neither DNA-based NGS nor RNA-based NGS revealed the NUTM1 gene rearrangement. Using this case as a basis, we have reviewed the related literature, compared the common diagnostic methods of NC, and discussed the advantages and limitations of current tools employed for molecular analysis of the gene fusion.

Detecting ALK Rearrangement with RT-PCR: A Reliable Approach Compared with Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with NSCLC

Background

Precise detection of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement guides the application of ALK-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely used in clinics, but DNA-based NGS used to detect fusion genes has delivered false-negative results. However, fusion genes can be successfully detected at the transcription level and with higher sensitivity using RNA-based reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

Objective

This study compared the performance of RT-PCR and NGS in the detection of echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK fusion in Chinese patients with NSCLC.

Methods

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from 153 patients who were pathologically diagnosed as having NSCLC were collected from November 2017 to October 2019. Both DNA/RNA-based NGS and RNA-based RT-PCR were used to detect EML4-ALK fusion. For samples with discordant ALK status results, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or Sanger sequencing was used to further confirm the ALK status.

Results

In total, 124 samples were successfully analyzed using both NGS and RT-PCR. For 118 samples, results were consistent between NGS and RT-PCR, with 25 reported as ALK fusion positive and 93 as ALK fusion negative, achieving a concordance rate of 95.16%. Among the six samples with disconcordant results, five were positive using RT-PCR but negative using NGS, and one was positive using NGS but negative using RT-PCR. Four of six cases with disconcordant results (three RT-PCR positive and one NGS positive) were successfully validated using either FISH or Sanger sequencing.

Conclusions

Compared with NGS, RT-PCR appears to be a reliable method of detecting EML4-ALK fusion in patients with NSCLC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40291-021-00532-8.

Validation of ROS1 by immunohistochemistry against fluorescent in situ hybridisation on cytology and small biopsy samples in a large teaching hospital

OBJECTIVE

Rearranged ROS1, present in 1%-2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, usually young, never or light smokers, is assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to determine eligibility for tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the protein product of ROS1 rearrangement, a cost-effective alternative, is validated on cytology and small biopsy samples.

METHODS

From 1 March to 31 December 2019, cytology cell blocks and small biopsy samples from a selected cohort of NSCLC patients were concurrently tested for ROS1 gene rearrangement by Vysis 6q22 Break Apart FISH probe and IHC using Cell Signalling D4D6 antibody. Mismatch cases were tested by an RNA fusion next generation sequencing (NGS) panel.

RESULTS

In a prospective population of 95 cases, 91 were negative and two were positive by both FISH and IHC. Both dual positive cases were female never smokers and benefited from TKI treatment. Another two cases were positive by FISH but negative by IHC and repeat by NGS showed one to be negative but one failed. Turnaround time for IHC was 0 to 8 days from request to authorisation, whilst that of FISH was 9 to 42 days at a cost of £51 and £159 respectively.

CONCLUSION

IHC to assess for the protein product of ROS1 gene rearrangement on cytology cell blocks and small biopsy samples in a routine setting is a promising screening method to assess eligibility for TKI treatment with positive and indeterminate cases confirmed by FISH or NGS as it has good negative predictive value, faster turnaround time and is cost effective, with proven technical and clinical validation.

Low-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma With Sex Cord-like Differentiation and PHF1-JAZF1 Fusion With Deletions: A Diagnostic Pitfall of JAZF1 FISH

The molecular knowledge on endometrial stromal neoplasms has been rapidly increasing and is considered complementary to morphologic and immunohistochemical findings for better categorization of these tumors. The most common molecular alteration observed in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas is the JAZF1-SUZ12 fusion, whereas, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with sex cord-like differentiation have been shown more commonly to have fusions involving PHF1. Herein, we present a low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with sex cord-like differentiation with a fluorescence in situ hybridization showing the apparent loss of one copy of JAZF1 5' and 3' signals, rather than the expected "break-apart" pattern seen in the setting of a JAZF1 fusion. The case was then further evaluated by chromosome microarray and RNA fusion analysis. Overall, the molecular findings supported a PHF1-JAZF1 fusion with deletions right before and after the JAZF1 locus, impairing probe binding and resulting in the unusual "deletion" pattern observed in the JAZF1 fluorescence in situ hybridization, which would not intuitively suggest a fusion involving JAZF1. This case illustrates the importance of integration of morphological and molecular findings as well as the limitations of fluorescence in situ hybridization in detecting fusions, particularly in the setting of more complex chromosomal alterations even though the fusion partners are well-known.

Immunocytochemical Detection of ALK and ROS1 Rearrangements in Lung Cancer Cytological Samples

The detection of molecular alterations such as ROS1 and ALK rearrangements is performed as part of the diagnosis of advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma. These alterations allow the treatments with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cytological samples are very useful as up to 40% patients are diagnosed with this type of sample. Here we describe the immunocytochemistry technique usable to reveal the overexpression of ALK or ROS1 tyrosine kinase receptors secondary to ALK and ROS1 rearrangements, respectively.

Focus on ROS1-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Crizotinib, Resistance Mechanisms and the Newer Generation of Targeted Therapies

Simple Summary

Genetic rearrangements of the ROS1 gene account for up to 2% of NSCLC patients who sometimes develop brain metastasis, resulting in poor prognosis. This review discusses the tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib plus updates and preliminary results with the newer generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which have been specifically conceived to overcome crizotinib resistance, including brigatinib, cabozantinib, ceritinib, entrectinib, lorlatinib and repotrectinib. After introducing each agent’s properties, we provide suggestions on the best approaches to identify resistance mechanisms at an early stage, and we speculate on the most appropriate second-line therapies for patients who reported disease progression following crizotinib administration.

Abstract

The treatment of patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been revolutionised by the discovery of druggable mutations. ROS1 (c-ros oncogene) is one gene with druggable mutations in NSCLC. ROS1 is currently targeted by several specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), but only two of these, crizotinib and entrectinib, have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Crizotinib is a low molecular weight, orally available TKI that inhibits ROS1, MET and ALK and is considered the gold standard first-line treatment with demonstrated significant activity for lung cancers harbouring ROS1 gene rearrangements. However, crizotinib resistance often occurs, making the treatment of ROS1-positive lung cancers more challenging. A great effort has been undertaken to identify a new generation or ROS1 inhibitors. In this review, we briefly introduce the biology and role of ROS1 in lung cancer and discuss the underlying acquired mechanisms of resistance to crizotinib and the promising new agents able to overcome resistance mechanisms and offer alternative efficient therapies.

High prevalence of ROS1 gene rearrangement detected by FISH in EGFR and ALK negative lung adenocarcinoma

ROS1 rearrangement has become an important biomarker for targeted therapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of ROS1 rearrangement in Chinese LUAD with EGFR wild-type and ALK fusion-negative status, and analyze the relationship with their clinicopathological characteristics. A large cohort of 589 patients of LUAD with EGFR/ALK wild-type, diagnosed between April 2014 and June 2018, was retrospectively analyzed. ROS1 rearrangement in all these cases was detected by FISH, and 8 selected cases with different positive and negative signals were confirmed by NGS. As a result, total of 56 cases with ROS1 rearrangements out of 589 LUADs (9.51%) were identified by FISH. The frequency of ROS1 rearrangement in women was 22.15% (35/158), which was statistically higher than 4.87% (21/431) in men (P < 0.001). The ROS1 positive rate in the patients with age < 50 years old (25.29%, 22/87) was statistically higher than that in the patients with age ≥ 50 (6.77%, 34/502) (P < 0.001). There was a trend that the frequency of ROS1 rearrangement in LUAD with stage III-IV was higher than that in stage I-II (9.56%, 39/408 vs 2.50%, 1/40), although it did not reach significant difference (P = 0.135). 37 out of 56 cases of ROS1 rearranged LUAD showed solid (n = 20, 35.71%) and invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (n = 17, 30.36%) pathological subtypes. The median OS for patients of ROS1 rearranged LUAD treated with TKIs (n = 29) was 49.69 months (95% CI: 36.71, 62.67), compared with 32.55 months (95% CI: 23.24, 41.86) for those who did not receive TKI treatment (n = 16) (P = 0.040). The NGS results on ROS1 rearrangement in all the 8 cases were concordant with FISH results. In conclusion, high prevalence of ROS1 rearrangements occurs in EGFR/ALK wild-type LUAD detected by FISH, especially in younger, female, late stage patients, and in histological subtypes of solid and invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Evaluation of a new diagnostic immunohistochemistry approach for ROS1 rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

ROS1 rearrangement is an oncogenic driver of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Accurate detection of ROS1 rearrangements in clinical tumor samples is vital. In this study, a new immunohistochemistry (IHC) monoclonal antibody (mAb) 1A1 assay was evaluated in patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

A cohort (cohort A) of 22 positive ROS1 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) samples were studied to evaluate the IHC-1A1 assay by comparing IHC-D4D6 mAb and another cohort (cohort B) of 178 consecutive cases to verify the assay by comparison using the RT-PCR method. IHC results with 2+ (H-score > 100) or 3+ staining was considered ROS1-positive.

RESULTS

In cohort A, ROS1 protein expression was evaluated in 22 samples by IHC-D4D6 and IHC-1A1 assays. For IHC-1A1, one patient was 1+ and 11 patients were 1+ for IHC-D4D6. ROS1 2-3+ was found in 36.4 % (8/22) of samples with IHC-D4D6 and 90.9 % (20/22) with IHC-1A1.The mean H-score of the 1A1 ROS1 2-3+ cases was 203.5. With the D4D6 clone, the mean H-score of the D4D6 ROS1 2∼3+ cases was 182.5. In the 178 NSCLC patients in cohort B, ROS1 rearrangement was detected with IHC and RT-PCR assays. Two patients had tumors with ROS1 IHC-1A1 3+ and one patient was IHC-1A1 2+. Among the three patients, two were confirmed to have ROS1 rearrangement by RT-PCR. None of the 175 ROS1 IHC-1A1 0-1+ samples were ROS1-positive by RT-PCR.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that the new IHC-1A1 ROS1 clone is a sensitive preliminary method and may be another excellent screening method in addition to the original IHC detection method to detect ROS1 gene rearrangements.

Use of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) in Diagnosis and Tailored Therapies in Solid Tumors

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a standard technique used in routine diagnostics of genetic aberrations. Thanks to simple FISH procedure is possible to recognize tumor-specific abnormality. Its applications are limited to designed probe type. Gene rearrangements e.g., ALK, ROS1 reflecting numerous translocational partners, deletions of critical regions e.g., 1p and 19q, gene fusions e.g., COL1A1-PDGFB, genomic imbalances e.g., 6p, 6q, 11q and amplifications e.g., HER2 are targets in personalized oncology. Confirmation of genetic marker is frequently a direct indication to start specific, targeted treatment. In other cases, detected aberration helps pathologists to better distinguish soft tissue sarcomas, or to state a final diagnosis. Our main goal is to show that applying FISH to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sample (FFPE) enables assessing genomic status in the population of cells deriving from a primary tumor or metastasis. Although many more sophisticated techniques are available, like Real-Time PCR or new generation sequencing, FISH remains a commonly used method in many genetic laboratories.

Australian consensus statement for best practice ROS1 testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the leading cause of death from cancer globally. Diagnosis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with 5-year relative survival of 3.2%. ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) is an oncogenic driver of NSCLC occurring in up to 2% of cases and commonly associated with younger age and a history of never or light smoking. Results of an early trial with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib that inhibits tumours that harbour ROS1 rearrangements have shown an objective response rate (ORR) of 72% (95% CI 58-83%), median progression free survival (PFS) of 19.3 months (95% CI 15.2-39.1 months) and median overall survival (OS) of 51.4 months (95% CI 29.3 months to not reached). Therefore, with the availability of highly effective ROS1-targeted TKI therapy, upfront molecular testing for ROS1 status alongside EGFR and ALK testing is recommended for all patients with NSCLC. We review the tissue requirements for ROS1 testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) and we present a testing algorithm for advanced NSCLC and consider how the future of pathology testing for ROS1 may evolve.

Assessment of a New ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Clone (SP384) for the Identification of ROS1 Rearrangements in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: the ROSING Study

INTRODUCTION

The ROS1 gene rearrangement has become an important biomarker in NSCLC. The College of American Pathologists/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/Association for Molecular Pathology testing guidelines support the use of ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening test, followed by confirmation with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or a molecular test in all positive results. We have evaluated a novel anti-ROS1 IHC antibody (SP384) in a large multicenter series to obtain real-world data.

METHODS

A total of 43 ROS1 FISH-positive and 193 ROS1 FISH-negative NSCLC samples were studied. All specimens were screened by using two antibodies (clone D4D6 from Cell Signaling Technology and clone SP384 from Ventana Medical Systems), and the different interpretation criteria were compared with break-apart FISH (Vysis). FISH-positive samples were also analyzed with next-generation sequencing (Oncomine Dx Target Test Panel, Thermo Fisher Scientific).

RESULTS

An H-score of 150 or higher or the presence of at least 70% of tumor cells with an intensity of staining of 2+ or higher by the SP384 clone was the optimal cutoff value (both with 93% sensitivity and 100% specificity). The D4D6 clone showed similar results, with an H-score of at least 100 (91% sensitivity and 100% specificity). ROS1 expression in normal lung was more frequent with use of the SP384 clone (p < 0.0001). The ezrin gene (EZR)-ROS1 variant was associated with membranous staining and an isolated green signal FISH pattern (p = 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The new SP384 ROS1 IHC clone showed excellent sensitivity without compromising specificity, so it is another excellent analytical option for the proposed testing algorithm.

Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Assay (SP384) for Detection of ROS1 Rearrangements in a Large Cohort of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients

INTRODUCTION

The detection of a ROS1 rearrangement in advanced and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) led to a targeted treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors with favorable progression-free survival and overall survival of the patients. Thus, it is mandatory to screen for the ROS1 rearrangement in all these patients. ROS1 rearrangements can be detected using break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which is the gold standard; however, ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) can be used as a screening test because it is widely available, easy and rapid to perform, and cost-effective.

METHODS

We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and interpathologist agreement of two anti-ROS1 IHC clones, SP384 (Ventana, Tucson, Arizona) and D4D6 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, Massachusetts), in a training cohort of 51 positive ROS1 FISH LUAD cases, and then in a large validation cohort of 714 consecutive cases of LUAD from six routine molecular pathology platforms.

RESULTS

In the two cohorts, the SP384 and D4D6 clones show variable sensitivity and specificity rates on the basis of two cutoff points greater than or equal to 1+ (all % tumor cells) and greater than or equal to 2+ (>30% stained tumor cells). In the validation cohort, the D4D6 yielded the best accuracy for the presence of a ROS1 rearrangement by FISH. Interpathologist agreement was moderate to good (interclass correlation 0.722-0.874) for the D4D6 clone and good to excellent (interclass correlation: 0.830-0.956) for the SP384 clone.

CONCLUSIONS

ROS1 IHC is an effective screening tool for the presence of ROS1 rearrangements. However, users must be acutely aware of the variable diagnostic performance of different anti-ROS1 antibodies before implementation into routine clinical practice.

Crizotinib presented with promising efficacy but for concomitant mutation in next-generation sequencing-identified ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer

Introduction

Data of standard tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment outcome in next-generation sequencing (NGS)-identified ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were rare. Thus, it is practical and necessary to evaluate the efficacy and influential factors of crizotinib in real-world practice.

Patients and methods

A total of 1,466 NSCLC patients with positive targeted NGS test results from September 2015 to January 2018 were enrolled in this real-world retrospective study. Twenty-two patients had ROS1 rearrangement detected by NGS. The efficacy and safety of crizotinib were evaluated. Subgroups of concomitant mutations, brain metastasis, and fusion variants were also analyzed.

Results

Among all the patients, the occurrence rate of ROS1 rearrangement was 1.5% (22 of 1,466). Ten ROS1 fusion partners were detected, and the most common variant was CD74, which accounted for 50% (11 of 22). Five patients were found to carry dual ROS1 fusion partners, and 23% (5 of 22) of patients were detected with concomitant mutations, including TP53&PIK3CA&mTOR mutation, TP53&CDKN2A mutation, TP53&BRCA2 mutation, ALK missense mutation (p.R311H), and MET amplification. Among 22 patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC, 20 patients were diagnosed at stage IV, and 19 patients received crizotinib treatment. The average follow-up period was 16 months. The overall response rate (ORR) of crizotinib in unselected crizotinib-treated patients was 89%, and the median progression-free survival time (mPFS) was 13.6 months. It was shown that NSCLC patients with exclusive ROS1 rearrangement had a longer PFS than those carrying concomitant mutations (15.5 vs 8.5 months, P=0.0213). There were no newly occurring intolerant adverse events in this study.

Conclusion

Crizotinib is highly effective in NGS-identified ROS1-rearranged advanced NSCLC in real-word clinical practice, and the data are consistent with previous clinical trials applying fluorescence in situ hybridization/real-time PCR for ROS1 companion diagnosis. Concomitant mutations may not be rare and may deteriorate the PFS of crizotinib in patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC.

[IHC, FISH, CISH, NGS in non-small cell lung cancer: What changes in the biomarker era?]

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in France, with about 30,000 deaths per year. The overwhelming majority (90 %) are tobacco-related. The prognosis is dark but great therapeutic advances have been made with the development of targeted therapies first and then immunotherapy afterwards. These medications are conditioned to the expression of biomarkers that require specific tools in routine to measure them. We will detail in this chapter several techniques of anatomopathology, cytogenetics and molecular biology necessary for the detection of biomarkers in lung cancers, and their applications in thoracic oncology in 2018.

[Endobronchial Ultrasound Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for The Diagnosis and Genotyping of Lung Cancer]

背景与目的

超声气管镜针吸活检（endobronchial ultrasound guided tranbronchial needle aspiration, EBUS-TBNA）是临床怀疑肺癌患者的常用活检方式，在肺癌的诊断和分期中有着举足轻重的作用。然而该活检方式在诊断之余是否亦能提供充分的组织完成基因检测尚待研究。本文评价EBUS-TBNA所取得标本进行肺癌诊断及相关基因检测的可行性。

方法

对纵隔淋巴结肿大且临床怀疑肺癌诊断的患者进行EBUS-TBNA活检，所取得的标本进行病理诊断并对其中的非鳞非小细胞肺癌标本进行驱动基因检测。分析其诊断阳性率以及完成基因检测的可行性。

结果

入选377例患者平均单个淋巴结穿刺2.07针，确诊肺癌213例，经EBUS-TBNA诊断率92%。其中表皮生长因子受体（epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR）基因、间变淋巴瘤激酶（anaplasticlymphoma kinase, ALK）融合基因、以及同时完成两个基因检测的患者分别为84例（90%）、105例（96%）及79例（90%）。单因素分析显示组织基因检测成功率与穿刺淋巴结针数、淋巴结大小及淋巴结部位无关，但与肿瘤病理类型相关。腺癌病理类型的EGFR基因突变及ALK融合基因检测的成功率均高于未分类非小细胞肺癌。

结论

EBUS-TBNA可提供充足的组织对肺癌进行诊断和基因分型。肿瘤病理类型可能是影响基因检测阳性率的因素。

A study detection of the ROS1 gene fusion by FISH and ROS1 protein expression by IHC methods in patients with ovarian malignant or borderline serous tumors

OBJECTIVE

ROS1 is an orphan receptor protein tyrosine kinase which is supposed to undergo genetic rearrangement in carcinogenesis. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the frequency and clinicopathologic features associated with ROS1 gene fusion and ROS1 protein expression in patients with ovarian serous carcinoma or serous borderline tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue samples of 102 patients with high or low grade serous carcinoma and borderline serous tumors were selected randomly from the archives of Department of Gyneco-pathology, and analyzed for ROS1 gene expression. (Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method was used to assess ROS1 gene rearrangement, while ROS1 protein expression was analyzed using immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The study consisted of 94 cases of high-grade serous carcinoma (92.1%), 2 cases of low-grade serous carcinoma (%2) and 6 cases of serous borderline tumor (5.9%). ROS1 gene rearrangement analysis revealed that 4 patients (3.9%) were FISH-positive; whereas the immunohistochemical analysis yielded only 1 patient (0.9%) exhibiting faint positive expression of ROS1 protein. Given the low incidences of ROS1 gene rearrangement and protein expression, their relationships with clinicopathologic parameters could not be statistically analyzed.

CONCLUSION

Although rare, patients with ovarian serous carcinoma or serous borderline tumor may exhibit ROS1 gene rearrangement and ROS1 protein expression. Further large-scale studies are necessary to explore the clinicopathologic significance of ROS1 gene expression in ovarian serous carcinoma.

ALK (D5F3) CDx: an immunohistochemistry assay to identify ALK-positive NSCLC patients

Screening for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements is a very important process in treatment decision making for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is considered the universally accepted reference standard, it is associated with technical difficulties and high costs that have made global implementation of this assay challenging. Conversely, ALK immunohistochemistry has shown high sensitivity and specificity compared to FISH and other molecular assays and is more cost-effective. In fact, the ALK (D5F3) CDx immunohistochemistry assay was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as a standalone test for ALK rearrangements in lung cancer in 2015. In this review, we will discuss the overview of ALK rearrangements in NSCLC, various testing methods for ALK rearrangements, and the details of immunohistochemistry for ALK, in particular one with the ALK antibody clone D5F3.

Clinicopathological significance and diagnostic approach of ROS1 rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis: ROS1 in non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of ROS1 rearrangement and concordance between ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and molecular tests in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The study included 10,898 NSCLC cases from 21 eligible studies. ROS1 rearrangement rates were evaluated in NSCLC by a meta-analysis, including subgroup analyses. In addition, we performed a concordance analysis and a diagnostic test accuracy review of ROS1 IHC in NSCLC.

RESULTS

The estimated overall rate of ROS1 rearrangement and IHC positivity was 2.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5, 3.7). In the subgroup analysis, which was based on tumor subtype, the rate of ROS1 rearrangement and IHC positivity was 2.9% (95% CI 1.9, 4.5) and 0.6% (95% CI 0.3, 1.2) in adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma, respectively. The overall concordance rate between ROS1 IHC and molecular tests was 93.4% (95% CI 78.3, 98.2). In ROS1 IHC positive and negative cases, the concordance rates were 79.0% (95% CI 43.3, 94.9) and 97.0% (95% CI 83.3, 99.5), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and the specificity of ROS1 IHC were 0.90 (95% CI 0.70, 0.99) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.79, 0.84), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the curve of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 118.01 (95% CI 11.81, 1179.67) and 0.9417, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The rates of ROS1 rearrangement differed by tumor histologic subtype in NSCLC. ROS1 IHC may be useful for the detection of ROS1 rearrangement in NSCLC. Detailed criteria for evaluating ROS1 IHC are needed before it can be applied in daily practice.

Bright-field in situ hybridization detects gene alterations and viral infections useful for personalized management of cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Bright-field in situ hybridization (ISH) methods detect gene alterations that may improve diagnostic precision and personalized management of cancer patients. Areas covered: This review focuses on some bright-field ISH techniques for detection of gene amplification or viral infection that have already been introduced in tumor pathology, research and diagnostic practice. Other emerging ISH methods, for the detection of translocation, mRNA and microRNA have recently been developed and need both an optimization and analytical validation. The review also deals with their clinical applications and implications on the management of cancer patients. Expert commentary: The technology of bright-field ISH applications has advanced significantly in the last decade. For example, an automated dual-color assay was developed as a clinical test for selecting cancer patients that are candidates for personalized therapy. Recently an emerging bright-field gene-protein assay has been developed. This method simultaneously detects the protein, gene and centromeric targets in the context of tissue morphology, and might be useful in assessing the HER2 status particularly in equivocal cases or samples with heterogeneous tumors. The application of bright-field ISH methods has become the gold standard for the detection of tumor-associated viral infection as diagnostic or prognostic factors.

Targeted next-generation-sequencing for reliable detection of targetable rearrangements in lung adenocarcinoma-a single center retrospective study

Oncogenic rearrangements leading to targetable gene fusions are well-established cancer driver events in lung adenocarcinoma. Accurate and reliable detection of these gene fusions is crucial to select the appropriate targeted therapy for each patient. We compared the targeted next-generation-sequencing Oncomine Focus Assay (OFA; Thermo Fisher Scientific) with conventional ALK FISH and anti-Alk immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 52 lung adenocarcinomas (10 ALK rearranged, 18 non-ALK rearranged, and 24 untested cases). We found a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for detection of ALK rearrangements using the OFA panel. In addition, targeted next generation sequencing allowed us to analyze a set of 23 driver genes in a single assay. Besides EML4-ALK (11/52 cases), we detected EZR-ROS1 (1/52 cases), KIF5B-RET (1/52 cases) and MET-MET (4/52 cases) fusions. All EML4-ALK, EZR-ROS1 and KIF5B-RET fusions were confirmed by multiplexed targeted next generation sequencing assay (Oncomine Solid Tumor Fusion Transcript Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific). All cases with EML4-ALK rearrangement were confirmed by Alk immunohistochemistry and all but one by ALK FISH. In our experience, targeted next-generation sequencing is a reliable and timesaving tool for multiplexed detection of targetable rearrangements. Therefore, targeted next-generation sequencing represents an efficient alternative to time-consuming single target assays currently used in molecular pathology.

Comparison of Four PD-L1 Immunohistochemical Assays in Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Four different programmed death ligand 1 immunohistochemical assays are approved or in development as companion or complementary diagnostics to different immunotherapeutic agents in lung carcinoma. We sought to determine whether these assays are technically equivalent and whether one antibody can be used on an alternate staining platform.

METHODS

Serial sections of tissue microarrays constructed from 368 cases of resected lung cancer were stained for 22C3 and 28-8 on the Dako Link 48 platform (Dako, Carpinteria, Ca) and for SP142 and SP263 on the Ventana Benchmark Ultra platform (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ) strictly as per product insert. A protocol was developed to use the 22C3 antibody on the Ventana Benchmark Ultra platform.

RESULTS

Differences in mean tumor cell and immune cell staining were observed between the four assays (p < 0.001). Differences between 22C3 and 28-8 were not statistically significant. Concordance of tumor cell scores was good (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.674), particularly when SP142 was excluded as an outlier (ICC = 0.755). The highest concordance was seen between 22C3 and 28-8 (ICC = 0.812). Concordance was poor for immune cell staining (ICC = 0.212). When dichotomized according to clinically relevant cutoffs, pairwise comparisons showed poor to moderate concordance (κ = 0.196-0.578), with positive percent agreement ranging from 15.1% to 90.0%. The 22C3 antibody performed comparably on the Dako Link 48 platform and the alternate Ventana Benchmark Ultra platform (ICC = 0.921, κ = 0.897).

CONCLUSIONS

Concordance between the four programmed death ligand 1 immunohistochemical assays when performed and scored as intended show that apart from 28-8 and 22C3, they cannot be used interchangeably in clinical practice. A protocol was successfully developed to use 22C3 on an alternate platform, which may help to overcome some barriers to implementation.

Immunohistochemistry for predictive biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer

In the era of targeted therapy, predictive biomarker testing has become increasingly important for non-small cell lung cancer. Of multiple predictive biomarker testing methods, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is widely available and technically less challenging, can provide clinically meaningful results with a rapid turn-around-time and is more cost efficient than molecular platforms. In fact, several IHC assays for predictive biomarkers have already been implemented in routine pathology practice. In this review, we will discuss: (I) the details of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1) IHC assays including the performance of multiple antibody clones, pros and cons of IHC platforms and various scoring systems to design an optimal algorithm for predictive biomarker testing; (II) issues associated with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) IHC assays; (III) appropriate pre-analytical tissue handling and selection of optimal tissue samples for predictive biomarker IHC.

ROS1 [corrected]

ROS1 is a receptor tyrosine kinase that has recently been shown to undergo gene rearrangements in~1%-2% of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and in a variety of other tumours including cholangiocarcinoma, gastric carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma and in spitzoid neoplasms, glioblastoma and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours. The ROS1 gene fusion undergoes constitutive activation, regulates cellular proliferation and is implicated in carcinogenesis. ROS1 fusions can be detected by fluorescence in situ hybridisation, real-time PCR, sequencing-based techniques and immunohistochemistry-based methods in clinical laboratories. The small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, crizotinib has been shown to be an effective inhibitor of ROS1 and has received Food and Drug Administration approval for treatment of advanced NSCLC. The current review is an update on the clinical findings and detection methods of ROS1 in clinical laboratories in NSCLC and other tumours.

Detection of ROS1 rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer: current and future perspectives

ROS1 rearrangement characterizes a small subset (1%-2%) of non-small cell lung cancer and is associated with slight/never smoking patients and adenocarcinoma histology. Identification of ROS1 rearrangement is mandatory to permit targeted therapy with specific inhibitors, demonstrating a significantly better survival when compared with conventional chemotherapy. Detection of ROS1 rearrangement is based on in situ (immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization) and extractive non-in situ assays. While fluorescence in situ hybridization still represents the gold standard in clinical trials, this technique may fail to recognize rearrangements of ROS1 with some gene fusion partner. On the other hand, immunohistochemistry is the most cost-effective screening technique, but it seems to be characterized by low specificity. Extractive molecular assays are expensive and laborious methods, but they specifically recognize almost all ROS1 fusions using a limited amount of mRNA even from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues. This review is a discussion on the present and futuristic diagnostic scenario of ROS1 identification in lung cancer.

Immunohistochemistry of Pulmonary Biomarkers: A Perspective From Members of the Pulmonary Pathology Society

The use of immunohistochemistry for the determination of pulmonary carcinoma biomarkers is a well-established and powerful technique. Immunohistochemisty is readily available in pathology laboratories, is relatively easy to perform and assess, can provide clinically meaningful results very quickly, and is relatively inexpensive. Pulmonary predictive biomarkers provide results essential for timely and accurate therapeutic decision making; for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, predictive immunohistochemistry includes ALK and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) (ROS1, EGFR in Europe) testing. Handling along proper methodologic lines is needed to ensure patients receive the most accurate and representative test outcomes.

Spotlight on ceritinib in the treatment of ALK+ NSCLC: design, development and place in therapy

The identification of echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has radically changed the treatment of a subset of patients harboring this oncogenic driver. Crizotinib was the first ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor to receive fast approval and is currently indicated as the first-line therapy for advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC patients. However, despite crizotinib's efficacy, patients almost invariably progress, with the central nervous system being one of the most common sites of relapse. Different mechanisms of acquired resistance have been identified, including secondary ALK mutations, ALK copy number alterations and activation of bypass tracks. Different highly potent and brain-penetrant next-generation ALK inhibitors have been developed and tested in NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangements. Ceritinib, a structurally distinct and selective ALK inhibitor, showed 20 times higher potency than crizotinib in inhibiting ALK and had activity against the most common crizotinib-resistant mutations, including L1196M and G1269A, in preclinical models. In Phase I and II studies, ceritinib demonstrated pronounced activity in both crizotinib-naïve and crizotinib-refractory patients, with responses observed regardless of the presence of ALK resistance mutations. Ceritinib was the first ALK inhibitor to be approved for the treatment of crizotinib-refractory, ALK-rearranged NSCLC, and recent results from a Phase III study have demonstrated superior efficacy compared to standard chemotherapy in the first- and second-line setting. We provide an extensive overview of ceritinib from the design of the compound through preclinical data until efficacy and toxicity results from Phase I-III clinical studies. We review the molecular alterations associated with resistance to ceritinib and highlight the importance of obtaining tumor biopsy at progression to tailor therapy based upon the underlying resistance mechanism. We finally provide an outlook on novel rational therapeutic combinations.

Nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: diagnostic difficulties in small biopsies and cytological specimens

The pathological and molecular classification of lung cancer has become substantially more complex over the past decade. For diagnostic purposes on small samples, additional stains are frequently required to distinguish between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Subsequently, for advanced nonsquamous cell nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients, predictive analyses on epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase and ROS1 are required. In NSCLCs negative for these biomarkers, programmed death ligand-1 immunohistochemistry is performed. Small samples (biopsy and cytology) require “tissue” management, which is best achieved by the interaction of all physicians involved.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors in phase I and phase II clinical trials for non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Crizotinib is a first-in-class ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), which has proven its superiority over standard platinum-based chemotherapy for the first-line therapy of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The development of acquired resistance to crizotinib represents an ongoing challenge with the central nervous system being one of the most common sites of relapse. Ceritinib and alectinib are approved second-generation ALK TKIs. Several novel ALK inhibitors, more potent and with different selectivity compared to crizotinib, are currently in development. Areas covered: This review will focus on new ALK inhibitors, currently in phase 1 or 2 clinical studies. We will also comment on the mechanisms of resistance to ALK inhibition and the strategies to delay or overcome resistance. Expert opinion: The therapeutic management of ALK-rearranged NSCLC has been greatly improved. Next-generation ALK inhibitors have shown differential potency against ALK rearrangements and ALK resistance mutations. The molecular profile of the tumor at the time of disease progression to crizotinib is crucial for the sequencing of novel ALK TKIs. Ongoing clinical studies will address key issues, including the optimal therapeutic algorithm and whether combinational approaches are more effective than single ALK inhibition for the outcome of ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients.

[Crizotinib for ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer patients]

ROS1 fusions are rare mutations that preferentially concern young and non-smoker women. The ROS1-rearranged protein conserves an intact tyrosine kinase domain, leading to the constitutive activation of the ROS1 tyrosine kinase function and of its downstream pathways, that are known to be involved in tumorigenesis. These molecular abnormalities have shown their oncogenic potential in animals' models and in human, with an early effect on carcinogenesis. Several partners have been identified. Patients with non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) harbouring ROS1 alterations can receive specific targeted therapies. Indeed, crizotinib has recently been approved in France in advanced ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. We propose a review of the oncogenic role of ROS1 rearrangements, the different methods for its diagnosis, and the available treatments.

Multiplexed transcriptome analysis to detect ALK, ROS1 and RET rearrangements in lung cancer

ALK, ROS1 and RET gene fusions are important predictive biomarkers for tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer. Currently, the gold standard method for gene fusion detection is Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and while highly sensitive and specific, it is also labour intensive, subjective in analysis, and unable to screen a large numbers of gene fusions. Recent developments in high-throughput transcriptome-based methods may provide a suitable alternative to FISH as they are compatible with multiplexing and diagnostic workflows. However, the concordance between these different methods compared with FISH has not been evaluated. In this study we compared the results from three transcriptome-based platforms (Nanostring Elements, Agena LungFusion panel and ThermoFisher NGS fusion panel) to those obtained from ALK, ROS1 and RET FISH on 51 clinical specimens. Overall agreement of results ranged from 86-96% depending on the platform used. While all platforms were highly sensitive, both the Agena panel and Thermo Fisher NGS fusion panel reported minor fusions that were not detectable by FISH. Our proof-of-principle study illustrates that transcriptome-based analyses are sensitive and robust methods for detecting actionable gene fusions in lung cancer and could provide a robust alternative to FISH testing in the diagnostic setting.

Immunohistochemical Detection of ROS1 Fusion

OBJECTIVES

Patients whose tumors harbor ROS1 translocation may benefit from targeted therapy. Detection of ROS1 rearrangement can be done by three methods: immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and molecular assays. Immunohistochemistry would be a cost-effective means to screen for ROS1 translocation, which is uncommon.

METHODS

ROS1 immunostain was performed on cases with known ROS1 translocation status detected either by fluorescence in situ hybridization or next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven cases, 10 lung carcinomas with ROS1 rearrangement and 47 cases without ROS1 rearrangement (25 lung carcinomas, 13 gastrointestinal carcinomas, three brain tumors, and six miscellaneous tumors), were included. ROS1 immunostain exhibited 100% sensitivity and 85% specificity, with staining seen in 10 (100%) of 10 cases with ROS1 rearrangement and in seven (15%) of 47 lung cases without ROS1 rearrangement. Weak or 1+ staining of reactive pneumocytes was seen in eight (14%) of 57 cases, and strong staining of osteoclast giant cells was seen in one case.

CONCLUSIONS

Since ROS1 rearrangement is an infrequent event, immunohistochemistry is a cost-effective screening method. Confirmation of all positive and equivocal/weak staining with molecular assays would exclude the false-positive cases.

ALK Immunohistochemistry for ALK Gene Rearrangement Screening in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ALK gene rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through systematic review, meta-analysis and diagnostic test accuracy review.

Methods

The current study included 11,806 NSCLC cases in 42 eligible studies. We performed concordance analyses between ALK IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The diagnostic accuracy of ALK IHC was analyzed based on ALK IHC criteria and antibodies.

Results

The overall ALK IHC results were positive in 13.2%. The overall concordance rate between ALK IHC and FISH was 0.950 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.927-0.966). In the ALK IHC-positive and negative groups, the concordance rates were 0.805 (95% CI 0.733-0.861) and 0.985 (95% CI 0.978-0.990), respectively. The ALK FISH-positive rates were 0.009 (95% CI 0.004-0.023), 0.378 (95% CI 0.217-0.572), 0.628 (95% CI 0.420-0.796) and 0.900 (95% CI 0.840-0.939) in the ALK IHC 0, 1+, 2+ and 3+ groups, respectively. In diagnostic test accuracy review for ALK IHC, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.91), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the curve on the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 266.56 (95% CI 110.83-641.14) and 0.983, respectively.

Conclusions

Our results suggested that ALK IHC equivocal (score 1+ and 2+) cases should not be considered as IHC-negative in screening for ALK gene rearrangement. Additional detailed criteria for ALK IHC equivocal cases are necessary to determine how to best apply this approach in daily practice.

ROS1 copy number alterations are frequent in non-small cell lung cancer

Objectives

We aimed to determine the prevalence and partners of ROS1 rearrangements, to explore the correlation between FISH and IHC assays, and to investigate clinical implications of ROS1 copy number alterations (CNAs).

Methods

A total of 314 NSCLC patients were screened using ROS1 FISH break-apart probes. Of these, 47 surgical tumors were included in TMAs to analyze ROS1 heterogeneity assessed either by FISH and IHC, and chromosome 6 aneusomy. To characterize ROS1 partners, probes for CD74, EZR, SLC34A2 and SDC3 genes were developed. ROS1 positive FISH cases were screened also by IHC.

Results

Five patients were ROS1 positive (1.8%). We identified two known fusion partners in three patients: CD74 and SLC34A2. Four out of five ROS1 rearranged patients were female, never smokers and with adenocarcinoma histology. Rearranged cases were also positive by IHC as well. According to ROS1 CNAs, we found a prevalence of 37.8% gains/amplifications and 25.1% deletions.

Conclusions

This study point out the high prevalence of ROS1 CNAs in a large series of NSCLC. ROS1 gains, amplifications and deletions, most of them due to chromosome 6 polysomy or monosomy, were heterogeneous within a tumor and had no impact on overall survival.

Testing for ROS1 in non-small cell lung cancer: a review with recommendations

Rearrangements of the ROS1 gene occur in 1-2 % of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Crizotinib, a highly effective inhibitor of ROS1 kinase activity, is now FDA-approved for the treatment of patients with advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC. Consequently, focus on ROS1 testing is growing. Most laboratories currently rely on fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) assays using a dual-colour break-apart probe to detect ROS1 rearrangements. Given the rarity of these rearrangements in NSCLC, detection of elevated ROS1 protein levels by immunohistochemistry may provide cost-effective screening prior to confirmatory FISH testing. Non-in situ testing approaches also hold potential as stand-alone methods or complementary tests, including multiplex real-time PCR assays and next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms which include commercial test kits covering a range of fusion genes. In order to ensure high-quality biomarker testing, appropriate tissue handling, adequate control materials and participation in external quality assessment programmes are essential, irrespective of the testing technique employed. ROS1 testing is often only considered after negative tests for EGFR mutation and ALK gene rearrangement, based on the assumption that these oncogenic driver events tend to be exclusive. However, as the use of ROS1 inhibitors becomes routine, accurate and timely detection of ROS1 gene rearrangements will be critical for the optimal treatment of patients with NSCLC. As NGS techniques are introduced into routine diagnostic practice, ROS1 fusion gene testing will be provided as part of the initial testing package.

Diagnostic algorithm for detection of targetable driver mutations in lung adenocarcinomas: Comprehensive analyses of 205 cases with immunohistochemistry, real-time PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization methods

OBJECTIVES

Analysis of the targetable driver mutations is now recommended in all patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Molecular-based methods are usually adopted, however, along with the implementation of highly sensitive and/or mutation-specific antibodies, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been considered an alternative method for identifying driver mutations in lung adenocarcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 205 lung adenocarcinomas were examined for EGFR mutations and ALK and ROS1 rearrangements using real-time PCR, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and IHC in parallel. The performance of different commercially available IHC antibody clones toward targetable driver mutations was evaluated. The association between these driver mutations and clinicopathological characteristics was also analyzed.

RESULTS

In 205 cases we studied, 58.5% were found to harbor EGFR mutations, 6.3% ALK rearrangements and 1.0% ROS1 rearrangements. Compared to molecular-based methods, IHC of EGFR mutations showed an excellent specificity but the sensitivity is suboptimal, while IHC of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity. No significant difference regarding the performance of different antibody clones toward these driver mutations was observed, except that clone SP125 showed a higher sensitivity than 43B2 in the detection of p.L858R of EGFR.

CONCLUSION

In circumstances such as poor quality of nucleic acids or low content of tumor cells, IHC of EGFR mutation-specific antibodies could be used as an alternative method. Patients negative for EGFR mutations are subjected to further analysis on ALK and ROS1 rearrangements using IHC methods. Herein, we proposed a lung adenocarcinoma testing algorithm for the application of IHC in therapeutic diagnosis.

Improving Selection Criteria for ALK Inhibitor Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pooled-Data Analysis on Diagnostic Operating Characteristics of Immunohistochemistry

Lung cancer is often diagnosed by molecular markers for prediction and treatment. To date, the golden standard for detection of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We performed a pooled-data analysis on the diagnostic operating characteristics of immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We searched Embase, Pubmed, and Springer databases. The results of IHC were evaluated using a modified H-score. We used a 2-level bivariate meta-analysis following a random effect model to summarize sensitivity and specificity and fit hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic curves. We also performed sensitivity analysis using different antibodies to investigate potential heterogeneity. Twelve studies consisting of a total of 3754 NSCLC specimens were analyzed. When we defined 1+/2+/3+, 2+/3+, and 3+ as ALK positive, we found the sensitivities to be 99% (95% confidence interval [CI], 97%-100%), 86% (95% CI, 73%-93%), and 56% (95% CI, 36%-74%) and the specificities to be 98% (95% CI, 95%-99%), 99% (95% CI, 99%-100%), and 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%), respectively. We demonstrated that when defining 3+ as positive and 0 as negative the sensitivity was 99% and specificity was 100%. In our sensitivity analysis, we found the sensitivity of D5F3 and 5A4 antibodies to be much higher than that of ALK1. We concluded that IHC scores 0 and 3+ were nearly 100% concordant with FISH-negative and FISH-positive status, respectively. However, IHC scores 1+ and 2+ might require further confirmatory testing by FISH assay. IHC assay using D5F3 and 5A4 antibodies reliably detected NSCLC with ALK rearrangement and may be useful as a screening method to identify these tumors.

Inconsistent results in the analysis of ALK rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Identification of targetable EML4-ALK fusion proteins has revolutionized the treatment of a minor subgroup of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is regarded as the gold standard for detection of ALK rearrangements, ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) is often used as screening tool in clinical practice. In order to unbiasedly analyze the diagnostic impact of such a screening strategy, we compared ALK IHC with ALK FISH in three large representative Swedish NSCLC cohorts incorporating clinical parameters and gene expression data.

METHODS

ALK rearrangements were detected using FISH on tissue microarrays (TMAs), including tissue from 851 NSCLC patients. In parallel, ALK protein expression was detected using IHC, applying the antibody clone D5F3 with two different protocols (the FDA approved Ventana CDx assay and our in house Dako IHC protocol). Gene expression microarray data (Affymetrix) was available for 194 patients.

RESULTS

ALK rearrangements were detected in 1.7 % in the complete cohort and 2.0 % in the non-squamous cell carcinoma subgroup. ALK protein expression was observed in 1.8 and 1.4 % when applying the Ventana assay or the in house Dako protocol, respectively. The specificity and accuracy of IHC was high (> 98 %), while the sensitivity was between 69 % (Ventana) and 62 % (in house Dako protocol). Furthermore, only 67 % of the ALK IHC positive cases were positive with both IHC assays. Gene expression analysis revealed that 6/194 (3 %) tumors showed high ALK gene expression (≥ 6 AU) and of them only three were positive by either FISH or IHC.

CONCLUSION

The overall frequency of ALK rearrangements based on FISH was lower than previously reported. The sensitivity of both IHC assays was low, and the concordance between the FISH and the IHC assays poor, questioning current strategies to screen with IHC prior to FISH or completely replace FISH by IHC.