1
|
Thurfjell V, Micke P, Yu H, Krupar R, Svensson MA, Brunnström H, Lamberg K, Moens LNJ, Strell C, Gulyas M, Helenius G, Yoshida A, Goldmann T, Mattsson JSM. Comparison of ROS1-rearrangement detection methods in a cohort of surgically resected non-small cell lung carcinomas. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2022; 11:2477-2494. [PMID: 36636421 PMCID: PMC9830269 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-22-504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1)-rearrangement respond to treatment with ROS1 inhibitors. To distinguish these rare cases, screening with immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ROS1 protein expression has been suggested. However, the reliability of such an assay and the comparability of the antibody clones has been debated. Therefore we evaluated the diagnostic performance of current detection strategies for ROS1-rearrangement in two NSCLC-patient cohorts. Methods Resected tissue samples, retrospectively collected from consecutive NSCLC-patients surgically treated at Uppsala University Hospital were incorporated into tissue microarrays [all n=676, adenocarcinomas (AC) n=401, squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) n=213, other NSCLC n=62]. ROS1-rearrangements were detected using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (Abbott Molecular; ZytoVision). In parallel, ROS1 protein expression was detected using IHC with three antibody clones (D4D6, SP384, EPMGHR2) and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were determined. Gene expression microarray data (Affymetrix) and RNA-sequencing data were available for a subset of patients. NanoString analyses were performed for samples with positive or ambiguous results (n=21). Results Using FISH, 2/630 (0.3% all NSCLC; 0.5% non-squamous NSCLC) cases were positive for ROS1 fusion. Additionally, nine cases demonstrated ambiguous FISH results. Using IHC, ROS1 protein expression was detected in 24/665 (3.6% all NSCLC; 5.1% non-squamous NSCLC) cases with clone D4D6, in 18/639 (2.8% all NSCLC; 3.9% non-squamous NSCLC) cases with clone SP384, and in 1/593 (0.2% all NSCLC; 0.3% non-squamous NSCLC) case with clone EPMGHR2. Elevated RNA-levels were seen in 19/369 (5.1%) cases (Affymetrix and RNA-sequencing combined). The overlap of positive results between the assays was poor. Only one of the FISH-positive cases was positive with all antibodies and demonstrated high RNA-expression. This rearrangement was confirmed in the NanoString-assay and also in the RNA-sequencing data. Other cases with high protein/RNA-expression or ambiguous FISH were negative in the NanoString-assay. Conclusions The occurrence of ROS1 fusions is low in our cohorts. The IHC assays detected the fusions, but the accuracy varied depending on the clone. The presumably false-positive and uncertain FISH results questions this method for detection of ROS1-rearrangements. Thus, when IHC is used for screening, transcript-based assays are preferable for validation in clinical diagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktoria Thurfjell
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Patrick Micke
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Hui Yu
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Rosemarie Krupar
- Division of Pathology, Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Lung Center, Borstel, Germany;,Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Maria A. Svensson
- Clinical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Hans Brunnström
- Division of Pathology, Lund University and Laboratory Medicine Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristina Lamberg
- Department of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lotte N. J. Moens
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden;,Clinical Genomics Uppsala, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Carina Strell
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Miklos Gulyas
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Gisela Helenius
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Akihiko Yoshida
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Torsten Goldmann
- Division of Pathology, Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Lung Center, Borstel, Germany;,Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Großhansdorf, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Engelsöy U, Svensson MA, Demirel I. Estradiol Alters the Virulence Traits of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:682626. [PMID: 34354683 PMCID: PMC8329245 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.682626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the most common bacteria to cause urinary tract infection (UTI). Postmenopausal women have an increased risk of recurrent UTI. This is partly explained by estrogenic effects on host defenses against UTI. Current research is mostly focused on how UPEC affects host factors, but not so much is known about how host factors like hormones affect UPEC virulence. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of estradiol exposure on the virulence of UPEC. We found that a postmenopausal concentration of estradiol increased CFT073 growth and biofilm formation, but not the premenopausal concentrations. Real-time qPCR showed that estradiol altered the expression of genes associated with the iron acquisition system and metabolic pathways in CFT073. We also found that estradiol in a dose-dependent manner increased the expression of fimH and papC adhesins and increased colonization and invasion of bladder epithelial cells. The premenopausal concentration of estradiol also suppressed cytokine release from bladder epithelial cells. Additionally, we also showed using a Caenorhabditis elegans killing assay that estradiol increased the survival of CFT073-infected C. elegans worms. Taken together, our findings show that estradiol has the ability to alter the virulence traits of UPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrik Engelsöy
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Maria A Svensson
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.,Department of Research and Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Isak Demirel
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, iRiSC-Inflammatory Response and Infection Susceptibility Centre, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brägelmann J, Klümper N, Offermann A, von Mässenhausen A, Böhm D, Deng M, Queisser A, Sanders C, Syring I, Merseburger AS, Vogel W, Sievers E, Vlasic I, Carlsson J, Andrén O, Brossart P, Duensing S, Svensson MA, Shaikhibrahim Z, Kirfel J, Perner S. Pan-Cancer Analysis of the Mediator Complex Transcriptome Identifies CDK19 and CDK8 as Therapeutic Targets in Advanced Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 23:1829-1840. [PMID: 27678455 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2016] [Revised: 08/28/2016] [Accepted: 09/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: The Mediator complex is a multiprotein assembly, which serves as a hub for diverse signaling pathways to regulate gene expression. Because gene expression is frequently altered in cancer, a systematic understanding of the Mediator complex in malignancies could foster the development of novel targeted therapeutic approaches.Experimental Design: We performed a systematic deconvolution of the Mediator subunit expression profiles across 23 cancer entities (n = 8,568) using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Prostate cancer-specific findings were validated in two publicly available gene expression cohorts and a large cohort of primary and advanced prostate cancer (n = 622) stained by immunohistochemistry. The role of CDK19 and CDK8 was evaluated by siRNA-mediated gene knockdown and inhibitor treatment in prostate cancer cell lines with functional assays and gene expression analysis by RNAseq.Results: Cluster analysis of TCGA expression data segregated tumor entities, indicating tumor-type-specific Mediator complex compositions. Only prostate cancer was marked by high expression of CDK19 In primary prostate cancer, CDK19 was associated with increased aggressiveness and shorter disease-free survival. During cancer progression, highest levels of CDK19 and of its paralog CDK8 were present in metastases. In vitro, inhibition of CDK19 and CDK8 by knockdown or treatment with a selective CDK8/CDK19 inhibitor significantly decreased migration and invasion.Conclusions: Our analysis revealed distinct transcriptional expression profiles of the Mediator complex across cancer entities indicating differential modes of transcriptional regulation. Moreover, it identified CDK19 and CDK8 to be specifically overexpressed during prostate cancer progression, highlighting their potential as novel therapeutic targets in advanced prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 23(7); 1829-40. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Brägelmann
- Section for Prostate Cancer Research, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Niklas Klümper
- Pathology of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck and the Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Lübeck and Borstel, Germany
| | - Anne Offermann
- Pathology of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck and the Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Lübeck and Borstel, Germany
| | - Anne von Mässenhausen
- Section for Prostate Cancer Research, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Diana Böhm
- Pathology of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck and the Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Lübeck and Borstel, Germany
| | - Mario Deng
- Pathology of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck and the Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Lübeck and Borstel, Germany
| | - Angela Queisser
- Section for Prostate Cancer Research, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christine Sanders
- Pathology of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck and the Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Lübeck and Borstel, Germany
| | - Isabella Syring
- Section for Prostate Cancer Research, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Clinic for Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Axel S Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Wenzel Vogel
- Pathology of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck and the Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Lübeck and Borstel, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Sievers
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ignacija Vlasic
- Pathology of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck and the Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Lübeck and Borstel, Germany
| | - Jessica Carlsson
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Ove Andrén
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Peter Brossart
- Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stefan Duensing
- Molecular Uro-oncology, Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maria A Svensson
- Department of Research and Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Zaki Shaikhibrahim
- Pathology of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck and the Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Lübeck and Borstel, Germany
| | - Jutta Kirfel
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sven Perner
- Pathology of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck and the Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Lübeck and Borstel, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mattsson JSM, Brunnström H, Jabs V, Edlund K, Jirström K, Mindus S, la Fleur L, Pontén F, Karlsson MG, Karlsson C, Koyi H, Brandén E, Botling J, Helenius G, Micke P, Svensson MA. Inconsistent results in the analysis of ALK rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:603. [PMID: 27495736 PMCID: PMC4974795 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2646-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identification of targetable EML4-ALK fusion proteins has revolutionized the treatment of a minor subgroup of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is regarded as the gold standard for detection of ALK rearrangements, ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) is often used as screening tool in clinical practice. In order to unbiasedly analyze the diagnostic impact of such a screening strategy, we compared ALK IHC with ALK FISH in three large representative Swedish NSCLC cohorts incorporating clinical parameters and gene expression data. METHODS ALK rearrangements were detected using FISH on tissue microarrays (TMAs), including tissue from 851 NSCLC patients. In parallel, ALK protein expression was detected using IHC, applying the antibody clone D5F3 with two different protocols (the FDA approved Ventana CDx assay and our in house Dako IHC protocol). Gene expression microarray data (Affymetrix) was available for 194 patients. RESULTS ALK rearrangements were detected in 1.7 % in the complete cohort and 2.0 % in the non-squamous cell carcinoma subgroup. ALK protein expression was observed in 1.8 and 1.4 % when applying the Ventana assay or the in house Dako protocol, respectively. The specificity and accuracy of IHC was high (> 98 %), while the sensitivity was between 69 % (Ventana) and 62 % (in house Dako protocol). Furthermore, only 67 % of the ALK IHC positive cases were positive with both IHC assays. Gene expression analysis revealed that 6/194 (3 %) tumors showed high ALK gene expression (≥ 6 AU) and of them only three were positive by either FISH or IHC. CONCLUSION The overall frequency of ALK rearrangements based on FISH was lower than previously reported. The sensitivity of both IHC assays was low, and the concordance between the FISH and the IHC assays poor, questioning current strategies to screen with IHC prior to FISH or completely replace FISH by IHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna S M Mattsson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Hans Brunnström
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Pathology, Regional Laboratories Region Skåne, SE-221 85, Lund, Sweden
| | - Verena Jabs
- Department of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Karolina Edlund
- Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo) at Dortmund TU, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Karin Jirström
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Stephanie Mindus
- Department of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Linnéa la Fleur
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Pontén
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mats G Karlsson
- Department of Research and Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | | | - Hirsh Koyi
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Gävle hospital, Gävle; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden
| | - Eva Brandén
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Gävle hospital, Gävle; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden
| | - Johan Botling
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Gisela Helenius
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Patrick Micke
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Maria A Svensson
- Clinical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nowak M, Svensson MA, Carlsson J, Vogel W, Kebschull M, Wernert N, Kristiansen G, Andrén O, Braun M, Perner S. Prognostic significance of phospho-histone H3 in prostate carcinoma. World J Urol 2013; 32:703-7. [PMID: 23887713 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1135-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2013] [Accepted: 07/17/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men and the sixth most common cause of death from cancer in men worldwide. Currently, a sufficient pathological distinction between patients requiring further treatment and those for which active surveillance remains an option is still lacking, which leads to the problem of overtreatment. Cell proliferation is routinely assessed by detecting Ki-67 antigen. While Ki-67 is expressed throughout the interphase of proliferating cells, phosphorylation of the chromatin constituent histone H3 occurs only during the late G2 phase and mitosis thus providing a more strict assessment of the mitotic activity. We undertook this study to test whether expression of the recently introduced proliferation marker phospho-histone H3 (pHH3) in prostate carcinoma tissue sections exhibits prognostic significance in comparison with Ki-67. METHODS Protein expression of pHH3 and Ki-67 was assessed on TMA consisting of paraffin-embedded tissue from men that had undergone radical prostatectomy. The analysis included triplicate tissue cores of a total of 339 tumor foci. Immunohistochemical staining of pHH3 and Ki-67 was performed and analyzed using Definiens imaging software. RESULTS Prostate cancer tissue exhibited a significantly higher frequency of pHH3-positive cells compared to benign prostate tissue. pHH3 expression was significantly correlated with Ki-67 expression. Furthermore, statistical analysis revealed positive correlation between pHH3 expression and PSA levels at diagnosis and in addition negatively correlated with overall survival. In contrast to Ki-67 staining, pHH3 expression did not correlate with Gleason grade. CONCLUSION Our data point to a conceivable role of pHH3 as prognostic biomarker in prostate carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Nowak
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Svensson MA, LaFargue CJ, MacDonald TY, Pflueger D, Kitabayashi N, Santa-Cruz AM, Garsha KE, Sathyanarayana UG, Riley JP, Yun CS, Nagy D, Kosmeder JW, Pestano GA, Tewari AK, Demichelis F, Rubin MA. Testing mutual exclusivity of ETS rearranged prostate cancer. J Transl Med 2011; 91:404-12. [PMID: 20975660 PMCID: PMC3130188 DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2010.179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a clinically heterogeneous and multifocal disease. More than 80% of patients with prostate cancer harbor multiple geographically discrete cancer foci at the time of diagnosis. Emerging data suggest that these foci are molecularly distinct consistent with the hypothesis that they arise as independent clones. One of the strongest arguments is the heterogeneity observed in the status of E26 transformation specific (ETS) rearrangements between discrete tumor foci. The clonal evolution of individual prostate cancer foci based on recent studies demonstrates intertumoral heterogeneity with intratumoral homogeneity. The issue of multifocality and interfocal heterogeneity is important and has not been fully elucidated due to lack of the systematic evaluation of ETS rearrangements in multiple tumor sites. The current study investigates the frequency of multiple gene rearrangements within the same focus and between different cancer foci. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays were designed to detect the four most common recurrent ETS gene rearrangements. In a cohort of 88 men with localized prostate cancer, we found ERG, ETV1, and ETV5 rearrangements in 51% (44/86), 6% (5/85), and 1% (1/86), respectively. None of the cases demonstrated ETV4 rearrangements. Mutual exclusiveness of ETS rearrangements was observed in the majority of cases; however, in six cases, we discovered multiple ETS or 5' fusion partner rearrangements within the same tumor focus. In conclusion, we provide further evidence for prostate cancer tumor heterogeneity with the identification of multiple concurrent gene rearrangements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A Svensson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA,Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital of Örebro, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Christopher J LaFargue
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Theresa Y MacDonald
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dorothee Pflueger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Naoki Kitabayashi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Karl E Garsha
- Ventana, a Member of the Roche Group, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Chol S Yun
- Ventana, a Member of the Roche Group, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Dea Nagy
- Ventana, a Member of the Roche Group, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Ashutosh K Tewari
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Francesca Demichelis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA,Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark A Rubin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue Room C 410-A, New York, NY 10065, USA. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pflueger D, Terry S, Sboner A, Habegger L, Esgueva R, Lin PC, Svensson MA, Kitabayashi N, Moss BJ, MacDonald TY, Cao X, Barrette T, Tewari AK, Chee MS, Chinnaiyan AM, Rickman DS, Demichelis F, Gerstein MB, Rubin MA. Discovery of non-ETS gene fusions in human prostate cancer using next-generation RNA sequencing. Genome Res 2010; 21:56-67. [PMID: 21036922 DOI: 10.1101/gr.110684.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Half of prostate cancers harbor gene fusions between TMPRSS2 and members of the ETS transcription factor family. To date, little is known about the presence of non-ETS fusion events in prostate cancer. We used next-generation transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) in order to explore the whole transcriptome of 25 human prostate cancer samples for the presence of chimeric fusion transcripts. We generated more than 1 billion sequence reads and used a novel computational approach (FusionSeq) in order to identify novel gene fusion candidates with high confidence. In total, we discovered and characterized seven new cancer-specific gene fusions, two involving the ETS genes ETV1 and ERG, and four involving non-ETS genes such as CDKN1A (p21), CD9, and IKBKB (IKK-beta), genes known to exhibit key biological roles in cellular homeostasis or assumed to be critical in tumorigenesis of other tumor entities, as well as the oncogene PIGU and the tumor suppressor gene RSRC2. The novel gene fusions are found to be of low frequency, but, interestingly, the non-ETS fusions were all present in prostate cancer harboring the TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion. Future work will focus on determining if the ETS rearrangements in prostate cancer are associated or directly predispose to a rearrangement-prone phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothee Pflueger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York 10021, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pflueger D, Terry S, Sboner A, Habegger L, Esgueva R, Svensson MA, Lin PC, Kitabayashi N, Moss BJ, Tewari AK, Chee MS, Demichelis F, Gerstein MB, Rubin MA. Abstract 2743: Accelerating the exploration of novel gene fusion events in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2010. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am10-2743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Gene fusions are regarded as cancer defining and often proven causative for cancer development. Up to 50% of prostate cancers harbor recurrent gene fusions, most often the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion. Other ETS gene fusions have been described involving ETV1, ETV4, and ETV5. The remaining prostate cancers are considered gene fusion negative based on fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) or RT-PCR for known fusion specific transcripts. Paired-end RNA-sequencing is a novel approach to systematically interrogate for fusion transcripts in a global and un-biased manner. Herein, we exploit FusionSeq, a computational tool specifically developed to nominate chimeric transcripts from paired-end RNA-seq data, with the goal of identifying new gene fusions. Using FusionSeq we identified the androgen-induced genes FKBP5 and KLK2 as two novel 5′ fusion partners for the ETS genes ERG and ETV1, respectively. General transcriptional chimerism (e.g. read-through transcripts) without evidence of underlying genomic rearrangements is not restricted to prostate cancer but also occurs in the patient's matched benign prostate tissue, providing evidence for an extended complexity of the cellular transcriptome and supporting the notion that a gene's definition might have to be considered flexible. Finally, we report the identification and the validation of two novel gene fusions: i) the tumor suppressor and cell cycle regulator CDKN1A (p21WAF, CIP1) is fused to CD9; besides down-regulating p21 gene expression, the CDKN1A-CD9 fusion also alters the CD9 protein. ii) by fusing IKBKB (IKK2, IκB kinase beta subunit) to TNPO1 (transportin 1), IKBKB gene expression increases over other prostate cancers, suggesting a pronounced activation of the NFκB complex. Our results show that a small subset of prostate cancers may harbor private gene fusions involving tumor suppressors and regulators of pathways implicated in cancer development.
Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2743.
Collapse
|
9
|
Demichelis F, Setlur SR, Beroukhim R, Perner S, Korbel JO, Lafargue CJ, Pflueger D, Pina C, Hofer MD, Sboner A, Svensson MA, Rickman DS, Urban A, Snyder M, Meyerson M, Lee C, Gerstein MB, Kuefer R, Rubin MA. Distinct genomic aberrations associated with ERG rearranged prostate cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2009; 48:366-80. [PMID: 19156837 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Emerging molecular and clinical data suggest that ETS fusion prostate cancer represents a distinct molecular subclass, driven most commonly by a hormonally regulated promoter and characterized by an aggressive natural history. The study of the genomic landscape of prostate cancer in the light of ETS fusion events is required to understand the foundation of this molecularly and clinically distinct subtype. We performed genome-wide profiling of 49 primary prostate cancers and identified 20 recurrent chromosomal copy number aberrations, mainly occurring as genomic losses. Co-occurring events included losses at 19q13.32 and 1p22.1. We discovered three genomic events associated with ERG rearranged prostate cancer, affecting 6q, 7q, and 16q. 6q loss in nonrearranged prostate cancer is accompanied by gene expression deregulation in an independent dataset and by protein deregulation of MYO6. To analyze copy number alterations within the ETS genes, we performed a comprehensive analysis of all 27 ETS genes and of the 3 Mbp genomic area between ERG and TMPRSS2 (21q) with an unprecedented resolution (30 bp). We demonstrate that high-resolution tiling arrays can be used to pin-point breakpoints leading to fusion events. This study provides further support to define a distinct molecular subtype of prostate cancer based on the presence of ETS gene rearrangements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Demichelis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY 10065
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Svensson MA. Increased sensitivity of the indirect immunofluorescence method by use of a tertiary fluorochrome-labeled antibody. J Histochem Cytochem 1991; 39:235-7. [PMID: 1987267 DOI: 10.1177/39.2.1987267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The standard protocol for indirect immunofluorescence was modified by the addition of a third layer of antibodies. These antibodies were conjugated with the same fluorochrome as the secondary antibodies. This modification resulted in significant enhancement of the sensitivity of immunolabeling. The method may be useful when the standard indirect immunofluorescent technique results in weak labeling, and also to regain labeling in sections where specific fluorescence has faded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Svensson
- Department of Anatomy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|