Challenges Associated With Cervical Cancer Screening and Management in Obese Women: A Provider Perspective

Associations of obesity with post-treatment risks of cervical precancer and cancer

BACKGROUND

Individuals with obesity have an increased risk of cervical cancer, in part related to challenges associated with cervical sampling and visualization that result in missed detection of cervical precancers. The influence of obesity on the effectiveness of excisional treatment of detected cervical precancers and posttreatment disease risk is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate posttreatment risks of cervical precancer and cancer by body mass index (BMI).

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included individuals aged 25 years and older undergoing excisional treatment for cervical precancer, either cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or 3 or adenocarcinoma in situ as of January 2017 with follow-up through February 2023. Patients were excluded if they were missing BMI, had cancer upon excision or had hysterectomy in lieu of excision, or were missing a valid referral screening visit. We categorized BMI as follows: underweight/normal (<25 kg/m2), overweight (25 to <30 kg/m2), and obesity (≥30kg/m2), as well as by class (I-III) of obesity. We calculated 2-year risks of CIN3 and cancer (combined as CIN3+) using Kaplan Meier methods and evaluated multivariable adjusted associations of BMI with CIN3+ using Cox Proportional Hazards regression analyses, accounting for age at treatment, race and ethnicity, and treatment type.

RESULTS

Among 10,614 patients, a total of 680 (6.4%) developed post-treatment CIN3+; most (91%) within 2 years of treatment. Two-year CIN3+ and cancer risks were highest in those with obesity (8.65%, 95% CI, 7.6%-9.9% and 0.79%, 95% CI, 0.5%-1.2%, respectively) and lowest in those with normal weight (5.57%, 95% CI, 4.9%-6.3% and 0.29%, 95% CI, 0.2%-0.5%, respectively). Hazard ratios measuring associations of BMI with risk of posttreatment CIN3+ ranged from 1.19 (95% CI, 1.0-1.4) among those with overweight to 1.89 (95% CI, 1.4-2.6) among those with class III obesity (P-trend<.0001). A similar trend was observed for cancer, from 1.62 (95% CI, 0.8-3.3) for overweight and 3.50 (95% CI, 1.3-9.3) for class III obesity (P-trend=.016).

CONCLUSION

Patients with obesity undergoing excisional treatment for cervical precancer have a higher risk of residual or recurrent disease, likely due to incomplete excision.

Association of body mass index with anal human papillomavirus infection and histologically confirmed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in people who receive services at the Anal Neoplasia Clinic in Puerto Rico

Objective

This study aimed to assess the association of body mass index (BMI) with anal high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) and biopsy-confirmed histologic anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) among a clinic-based sample of Hispanics in Puerto Rico.

Methods

This cross-sectional study evaluated medical records of adults who received services at the Anal Neoplasia Clinic of the University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center between October 2014 and December 2022. The study included 543 records with complete clinical information regarding anal HR-HPV and anal HSIL status. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results

Mean age of participants was 44.10 ± 13.24 years, 65.2% were men, 71.7% were HIV-infected, 74.4% had anal HR-HPV infection, and 37.9% had biopsy-confirmed HSIL. Regarding BMI, 2.4% were underweight, 31.9% normal weight, and 39.0 % overweight; while 17.3 % had class I, 5.2% class II, and 4.2% class III obesity. No significant association was observed between BMI and anal HR-HPV infection in adjusted analyses. Lower odds of anal HSIL were observed among overweight individuals (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41 - 0.99) and those with class II/III obesity (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.22 - 1.01) compared to adults with underweight/normal BMI, after adjusting for potential confounders. No significant association was observed for class I obesity.

Conclusion

BMI was not associated with anal HR-HPV infection. Overweight and obese individuals had lower odds of having anal HSIL than adults with underweight/normal BMI. This finding could suggest underdiagnosis of HSIL among overweight/obese individuals, or reduced risk in this group.

Overweight and obesity as risk factors for cervical cancer and detection of precancers among screened women: A nationwide, population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Obesity is a known risk factor for many types of cancer. However, there is no clear evidence whether overweight and obesity increases the risk of cervical cancer. We investigated the association between body mass index (BMI) and detection of squamous and glandular cervical cancer and precancer.

METHODS

Based on the Medical Birth Registry, we conducted a nationwide cohort study in Denmark of 384,559 women with BMI ≥18.5 kg/m2 (pre-pregnancy BMI reported at the start of the pregnancy) having a cervical cytology screening at age 23-49 years within 5 years following the date of childbirth. The cohort was followed for 10 years from the first cervical cytology screening after the childbirth. We assessed absolute risks of cervical lesions according to BMI with the Aalen-Johansen estimator. We conducted Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Analyses were adjusted for age, calendar year, parity, oral contraception use, HPV vaccination, smoking, country of origin, and education.

RESULTS

Overweight and obesity were associated with higher rates of cervical cancer (HR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.49 and HR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.91-1.43, respectively) and lower rates of cervical precancer detection (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92 and HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.63-0.71, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher than normal BMI was associated with higher incidence rates of cervical cancer and lower rates of precancer detection, emphasizing the importance of further research in possible mechanisms behind this association.

Improving visualization of the cervix during pelvic exams: A simulation using a physical model of the speculum and human vagina as a steppingstone to reducing disparities in gynecological cancers

Pelvic exams are frequently complicated by collapse of the lateral vaginal walls, obstructing the view of the cervix. To overcome this, physicians frequently repurpose a glove or a condom as a sheath placed over the speculum blades to retract the lateral vaginal walls. Despite their regular use in clinical practice, little research has been done comparing the relative efficacy of these methods. Better visualization of the cervix can benefit patients by decreasing examination-related discomfort, improving cancer screening accuracy, and preventing the need to move the examination to the operating room under general anesthesia. This study presents a physical model that simulates vaginal pressure being exerted around a speculum. Using it, we conduct controlled experiments comparing the efficacy of different condom types, glove materials, glove sizes, and techniques to place gloves on the speculum. The results show that the best sheath is the middle finger of nitrile-material gloves. They provide adequate lateral wall retraction without significantly restricting the opening of the speculum. In comparison, condoms provide a smaller amount of retraction due to loosely fitting the speculum. They may still be a reasonable option for a different speculum size. However, vinyl-material gloves are an impractical option for sheaths; they greatly restrict speculum opening, occasionally even breaking the speculum, which overcome its retraction benefits. Glove size, condom brand, and condom material (latex vs polyisoprene) had minimal impact. This study serves as a guide for clinicians as they use easily accessible tools to perform difficult pelvic exams. We recommend that physicians consider nitrile gloves as the preferred option for a sheath around a speculum. Additionally, this study demonstrates proof-of-concept of a physical model that quantitatively describes different materials on their ability to improve cervical access. This model can be used in future research with more speculum and material combinations, including with materials custom-designed for vaginal retraction.

HPV Testing and its Role in Cervical Cancer Screening

The recognition that persistent infection with carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical precancer and cancer has led to the introduction of HPV testing into cervical cancer screening, either as a primary screening test or in conjunction with cervical cytology (i.e., co-testing). HPV testing has much higher sensitivity for detection of cervical precancer and provides greater long-term reassurance if negative compared to cytology. However, most HPV infections are transient, and do not progress to invasive cancer, thus triage tests are required to identify individuals who should be referred to colposcopy for diagnostic evaluation. This chapter begins with a description of the biology, natural history, and epidemiology of HPV as a foundation for understanding the role of HPV in cervical carcinogenesis. This section is followed by a detailed discussion regarding the introduction of HPV-based testing and triage into cervical cancer screening and management. Summarized triage tests include cervical cytology, HPV genotyping, p16/Ki-67 dual stain, and HPV and cellular methylation markers. The final section of this chapter includes an important discussion on cervical cancer disparities, particularly within the United States, followed by concluding remarks.

Preventive Health Screening in Veterans Undergoing Bariatric Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Individuals with obesity are vulnerable to low rates of preventive health screening. Veterans with obesity seeking bariatric surgery are also hypothesized to have gaps in preventive health screening. Evaluation in a multidisciplinary bariatric surgery clinic is a point of interaction with the healthcare system that could facilitate improvements in screening.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 381 consecutive patients undergoing bariatric surgery at a Veterans Affairs Hospital from January 2010 to October 2021. Age- and sex-appropriate health screening rates were determined at initial referral to a multidisciplinary bariatric surgery clinic and at the time of surgery. Rates of guideline concordance at both time points were compared using McNemar's test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for nonconcordance.

RESULTS

Concordance with all recommended screening was low at initial referral and significantly improved by time of surgery (39.1%‒63.8%; p<0.001). Screening rates significantly improved for HIV (p<0.001), cervical cancer (p=0.03), and colon cancer (p<0.001). Increases in BMI (p=0.005) and the number of indicated screening tests (p=0.029) were associated with reduced odds of concordance at initial referral. Smoking history (p=0.012) and increasing distance to the nearest Veterans Affairs Medical Center (p=0.039) were associated with reduced odds of change from nonconcordance at initial referral to concordance at the time of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of preventive health screening in Veterans with obesity are low. A multidisciplinary bariatric surgery clinic is an opportunity to improve preventive health screening in Veterans referred for bariatric surgery.

Women with obesity participate less in cervical cancer screening and are more likely to have unsatisfactory smears: Results from a nationwide Danish cohort study

Some studies found an association between obesity and increased cervical cancer risk, but potential mechanisms are unknown. In this nationwide register-based cohort study, we investigated the association between overweight/obesity and cervical cancer screening participation and risk of unsatisfactory smears. The study population was identified in the Danish Medical Birth Registry. We included 342,526 women aged 23-49 years with pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) registered during 2004-2013. Screening participation and unsatisfactory smears during up to four years after child birth were identified in a nationwide pathology register. We used absolute risk regression to estimate the relative absolute risk (RAR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of screening participation according to BMI, adjusted for age, calendar year, sociodemographic characteristics, parity and previous high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Among those who were screened (n = 295,482), we used log-binomial regression to investigate the relative risk (RR) of an unsatisfactory smear according to BMI, adjusted for age, year, parity, oral contraceptive use and pathology department. A lower proportion of obese women (79.3%) than women of normal weight (85.8%) were screened, and obese women had lower adjusted probability of being screened than women of normal weight (RAR_adjusted = 0.94, 95% CI, 0.93-0.95). A higher proportion of obese women (2.4%) than women of normal weight (1.7%) had an unsatisfactory smear, and this association remained after adjustments (RR_adjusted = 1.28, 95% CI, 1.19-1.38). In conclusion, women with obesity were less likely to participate in cervical cancer screening and more likely to have an unsatisfactory smear than women of normal weight.

Impact of COVID-19 on cervical cancer screening: Challenges and opportunities to improving resilience and reduce disparities

The COVID-19 pandemic has a major impact on a wide range of health outcomes. Disruptions of elective health services related to cervical screening, management of abnormal screening test results, and treatment of precancers, may lead to increases in cervical cancer incidence and exacerbate existing health disparities. Modeling studies suggest that a short delay of cervical screening in subjects with previously negative HPV results has minor effects on cancer outcomes, while delay of management and treatment can lead to larger increases in cervical cancer. Several approaches can mitigate the effects of disruption of cervical screening and management. HPV-based screening has higher accuracy compared to cytology, and a negative HPV result provides longer reassurance against cervical cancer; further, HPV testing can be conducted from self-collected specimens. Self-collection expands the reach of screening to underserved populations who currently do not participate in screening. Self-collection and can also provide alternative screening approaches during the pandemic because testing can be supported by telehealth and specimens collected in the home, substantially reducing patient-provider contact and risk of COVID-19 exposure, and also expanding the reach of catch-up services to address backlogs of screening tests that accumulated during the pandemic. Risk-based management allows prioritizing management of patients at highest risk of cervical cancer while extending screening intervals for those at lowest risk. The pandemic provides important lessons for how to make cervical screening more resilient to disruptions and how to reduce cervical cancer disparities that may be exacerbated due to disruptions of health services.