Compliance with azithromycin versus erythromycin in the setting of a pertussis outbreak

Long-term, Low-Dose Oral Azithromycin Treatment for Chronic Severe Bilateral Blepharokeratoconjunctivitis in Pediatric Patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral azithromycin treatment combined with topical antibiotic and anti-inflammatory agents in pediatric patients with chronic severe bilateral blepharokeratoconjunctivitis.

METHODS

Patients younger than 14 years with chronic and severe bilateral blepharokeratoconjunctivitis were reviewed retrospectively. Consecutive patients receiving oral azithromycin treatment were included. All patients received oral azithromycin (5 mg/kg/single dose daily) for at least 4 weeks combined with topical antibiotic and anti-inflammatory agents. Before and after the treatment, clinical symptoms were noted, and corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining and corneal neovascularization were graded. Meibomian gland secretion and meibomian gland plugging were also assessed. All patients completed at least 3 months of follow-up after completion of the oral azithromycin treatment. Patients' clinical data at the time of diagnosis and last follow-up visit were statistically compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine children (58 eyes, mean age of 6.51 years) were included. The mean time of oral azithromycin use was 5.87 weeks (range: 4 to 10 weeks). Clinical symptoms and signs and visual acuity were significantly improved after treatment. The mean fluorescein staining and corneal neovascularization grades and meibomian gland secretion and meibomian gland plugging scores also improved after treatment (P < .001). Eyelid distortion or fornix shortening was not observed. At the last follow-up visit, all patients were stable with treatment only with daily eyelid hygiene, topical cyclosporine, and artificial tears.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term, low-dose oral azithromycin combined with topical antibiotic and anti-inflammatory agents is an effective treatment option for pediatric patients with chronic severe bilateral blepharokeratoconjunctivitis. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 20XX;X(X):XX-XX.].

High post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) uptake among household contacts of pertussis patients enrolled in a PEP effectiveness evaluation - United States, 2015-2017

BACKGROUND

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for pertussis is recommended for household contacts of pertussis cases in the United States within 21 days of exposure, but data on PEP effectiveness for prevention of secondary cases in the setting of widespread pertussis vaccination are limited. We implemented a multi-state evaluation of azithromycin PEP use and effectiveness among household contacts.

METHODS

Culture- or PCR-confirmed pertussis cases were identified through surveillance. Household contacts were interviewed within 7 days of case report and again 14-21 days later. Interviewers collected information on exposure, demographics, vaccine history, prior pertussis diagnosis, underlying conditions, PEP receipt, pertussis symptoms, and pertussis testing. A subset of household contacts provided nasopharyngeal and blood specimens during interviews.

RESULTS

Of 299 household contacts who completed both interviews, 12 (4%) reported not receiving PEP. There was no evidence of higher prevalence of cough or pertussis symptoms among contacts who did not receive PEP. Of 168 household contacts who provided at least one nasopharyngeal specimen, four (2.4%) were culture or PCR positive for B. pertussis; three of these received PEP prior to their positive test result. Of 156 contacts with serologic results, 14 (9%) had blood specimens that were positive for IgG anti-pertussis toxin (PT) antibodies; all had received PEP.

CONCLUSIONS

Very high PEP uptake was observed among household contacts of pertussis patients. Although the number of contacts who did not receive PEP was small, there was no difference in prevalence of pertussis symptoms or positive laboratory results among these contacts compared with those who did receive PEP.

Association between antibiotic prescribing in pregnancy and cerebral palsy or epilepsy in children born at term: a cohort study using the health improvement network

BACKGROUND

Between 19%-44% pregnant women are prescribed antibiotics during pregnancy. A single, large randomised-controlled-trial (ORACLE Childhood Study II) found an increased risk of childhood cerebral palsy and possibly epilepsy following prophylactic antibiotic use in pregnant women with spontaneous preterm labour. We ascertained whether this outcome could be reproduced across the population of babies delivered at term and prospectively followed in primary-care using data from The Health Improvement Network.

METHODS

We determined the risk of cerebral palsy or epilepsy in children whose mothers were prescribed antibiotics during pregnancy using a cohort of 195,909 women linked to their live, term-born, singleton children. We compared the effect of antibiotic class, number of courses and timing of prescribing in pregnancy. Analyses were adjusted for maternal risk factors (e.g. recorded infection, age, chronic conditions, social deprivation, smoking status). Children were followed until age seven years or cessation of registration with the primary-care practitioner.

RESULTS

In total, 64,623 (33.0%) women were prescribed antibiotics in pregnancy and 1,170 (0.60%) children had records indicating cerebral palsy or epilepsy. Adjusted analyses showed no association between prescribing of any antibiotic and cerebral palsy or epilepsy (adj.HR 1.04, 95%CI 0.91-1.19). However, compared with penicillins, macrolides were associated with an increased risk of cerebral palsy or epilepsy (adj.HR 1.78, 95%CI 1.18-2.69; number needed to harm 153, 95%CI 71-671).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no overall association between antibiotic prescribing in pregnancy and cerebral palsy and/or epilepsy in childhood. However, our finding of an increased risk of cerebral palsy or epilepsy associated with macrolide prescribing in pregnancy adds to evidence that macrolide use is associated with serious harm.

Azithromycin: more lethal than chloramphenicol?

Azithromycin is commonly used in sexual health and respiratory medicine, often when the diagnosis is presumptive. A recent article by Ray et al. reported that 1 out of 20 000 courses of low-dose azithromycin was associated with (sudden) cardiovascular death (including 1 out of 4000 courses in high-risk cardiovascular patients), ascribing these deaths to azithromycin itself. Here, we critique the actual study and examine conflicting data from randomised control trials, animal studies and observational data.

Socio-demographic and clinical factors influencing the adherence to treatment in Parkinson's disease: the ADHESON study

BACKGROUND

Symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) are usually controlled by a continuous titration of medication and addition of multiple therapies over the course of the disease. Therapeutic complex schemes, polymedication, comorbidities and the number of medications required contribute to non-adherence.

METHODS

This cross-sectional survey was performed in 418 patients with PD on treatment with any antiparkinsonian medication. Patient adherence was assessed through physicians' subjective perception and the Morisky-Green test (MGT). Several social, demographic and clinical features were correlated through bivariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

According to the physician's opinion 93.7%, and according to the MGT 60.4% of patients were adherent to parkinsonian therapy. The bivariate analysis showed greater adherence in patients with a high level of knowledge about the disease (62.8%), good clinical control (63.6%), a spouse or life partner (63%) and higher incomes (66%). Negative correlation with psychiatric symptoms was found. In relation to the MGT, the logistic regression model showed a negative correlation between cognitive deterioration and psychiatric pathology and adherence to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The physician's impression overestimated the compliance of patients when compared with an objective evaluation such as the MGT. Cognitive impairment and psychiatric symptoms are the clinical variables associated with a lower level of adherence.

Comparison of the effect of azithromycin versus erythromycin on antroduodenal pressure profiles of patients with chronic functional gastrointestinal pain and gastroparesis

BACKGROUND

Current pharmacologic treatments for gastroparesis have been disappointing due to the limited options available. Erythromycin ethylsuccinate is a potent prokinetic agent that stimulates gastric emptying. Recently, erythromycin has been linked to the occurrences of sudden cardiac death due to QT prolongation. Azithromycin is similar to erythromycin in structure but does not have significant drug-drug interactions as seen with erythromycin.

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine whether azithromycin stimulates antral activity in patients with chronic gastrointestinal pain and refractory gastroparesis.

METHODS

Small bowel manometric data on 30 patients undergoing clinical evaluation for chronic digestive problems or documented refractory gastroparesis were reviewed. Antral activity was measured after infusion of erythromycin 250 mg intravenous and azithromycin (500 or 250 mg intravenous) given at different intervals during the small bowel manometry. The parameters measured included the total duration of effect, mean amplitude of antral contractions, duration of the highest antral contraction phase, number of cycles per minute, and the motility index.

RESULTS

Comparison of erythromycin and azithromycin at similar doses showed a similar positive effect on antral activity. However, comparison of erythromycin and azithromycin at the higher dose of 500 mg showed that the mean amplitude, duration of antral activity, and motility index were significantly increased with azithromycin (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Azithromycin stimulates antral activity similar to erythromycin and moreover has a longer duration of effect. However, unlike erythromycin, azithromycin does not have significant drug-drug interactions and maybe a potential new medication for the treatment of gastroparesis and gastrointestinal dysmotility.