Straight Versus Modiolar Hugging Electrodes: Does One Perform Better Than the Other?

Dependability of Electrode to Modiolus Distance in Patients Specific Electrode Selection: A Cadaveric Model Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to discern the disparities in the electrode-to-modiolus distance (EMD) between cochleostomy and round window approaches when performed sequentially in the same temporal bone. Additionally, the study seeks to identify the cochlear metrics that contribute to these differences.

METHODOLOGY

A cross-sectional study was conducted, involving the sequential insertion of a 12-electrode array through both round window and cochleostomy approaches in cadaveric temporal bones. Postimplantation high-resolution CT scans were employed to calculate various parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 12 temporal bones were included in the imaging analysis, revealing a mean cochlear duct length of 32.892 mm. The EMD demonstrated a gradual increase from electrode 1 (C1) in the apex (1.9 ± 0.07 mm; n = 24) to electrode 12 (C12) in the basal turn (4.6 ± 0.24 mm; n = 12; p < 0.01). Significantly higher EMD values were observed in the cochleostomy group. Correlation analysis indicated a strong positive correlation between EMD and cochlear perimeter (CP) (rs = 0.64; n = 12; p = 0.03) and a strong negative correlation with the depth of insertion (DOI) in both the middle and basal turns (rs = - 0.78; n = 20; p < 0.01). Additionally, EMD showed a strong negative correlation with the DOI-CP ratio (rs = -0.81; n = 12; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The cochleostomy group exhibited a significantly higher EMD compared with the round window group. The strong negative correlation between EMD and DOI-CP ratio suggests that in larger cochleae with shallower insertions, EMD is greater than in smaller cochleae with deeper insertions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 134:4736-4744, 2024.

Advances in Evaluation of Electrode Insertion Trauma Induced Residual Hearing loss in Cochlear Implant Recipients and its significance- A Narrative Review

Cochlear implant surgery has revolutionized the management of profound hearing loss, with a growing focus on preserving residual hearing, particularly low-frequency hearing. This review synthesizes existing literature on cochlear implantation techniques, surgical principles, and emerging therapies aimed at reducing post-implantation hearing loss. Methodologically, a comprehensive narrative literature review was conducted, encompassing various study designs and participant demographics. The search strategy involved major biomedical databases, focusing on articles in English. Surgical techniques such as "soft surgery" emphasize minimizing mechanical stress on the cochlea, while advancements in pharmacological agents explore the use of corticosteroids, neurotrophins, and growth factors to enhance hearing preservation. Electrode design and insertion strategies are evolving to minimize trauma and optimize hearing outcomes, including consideration of insertion forces and electrode array designs. Evaluating residual hearing loss involves sophisticated techniques like electrocochleography and radiological imaging. The impact of residual hearing on auditory verbal outcomes is variable, with studies indicating positive correlations with language development, particularly in speech production. Emerging strategies in electrode design, surgical techniques, and drug delivery hold promise for improving outcomes in cochlear implantation. However, challenges such as the lack of standardized guidelines and the need for further clinical trials remain. Future directions include the exploration of nanotechnologies, gene therapies, and stem cells for constructing bionic ears, although ethical and technical hurdles persist. This review underscores the ongoing efforts to enhance cochlear implant functionality and the need for continued research to optimize outcomes for patients with hearing loss.

Brazilian Society of Otology task force - cochlear implant ‒ recommendations based on strength of evidence

OBJECTIVE

To make evidence-based recommendations for the indications and complications of Cochlear Implant (CI) surgery in adults and children.

METHODS

Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on cochlear implantation were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

The topics were divided into 2 parts: (1) Evaluation of candidate patients and indications for CI surgery; (2) CI surgery - techniques and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

CI is a safe device for auditory rehabilitation of patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss. In recent years, indications for unilateral hearing loss and vestibular schwannoma have been expanded, with encouraging results. However, for a successful surgery, commitment of family members and patients in the hearing rehabilitation process is essential.

Cochlear implant electrode design for safe and effective treatment

The optimal placement of a cochlear implant (CI) electrode inside the scala tympani compartment to create an effective electrode-neural interface is the base for a successful CI treatment. The characteristics of an effective electrode design include (a) electrode matching every possible variation in the inner ear size, shape, and anatomy, (b) electrically covering most of the neuronal elements, and (c) preserving intra-cochlear structures, even in non-hearing preservation surgeries. Flexible electrode arrays of various lengths are required to reach an angular insertion depth of 680° to which neuronal cell bodies are angularly distributed and to minimize the rate of electrode scalar deviation. At the time of writing this article, the current scientific evidence indicates that straight lateral wall electrode outperforms perimodiolar electrode by preventing electrode tip fold-over and scalar deviation. Most of the available literature on electrode insertion depth and hearing outcomes supports the practice of physically placing an electrode to cover both the basal and middle turns of the cochlea. This is only achievable with longer straight lateral wall electrodes as single-sized and pre-shaped perimodiolar electrodes have limitations in reaching beyond the basal turn of the cochlea and in offering consistent modiolar hugging placement in every cochlea. For malformed inner ear anatomies that lack a central modiolar trunk, the perimodiolar electrode is not an effective electrode choice. Most of the literature has failed to demonstrate superiority in hearing outcomes when comparing perimodiolar electrodes with straight lateral wall electrodes from single CI manufacturers. In summary, flexible and straight lateral wall electrode type is reported to be gentle to intra-cochlear structures and has the potential to electrically stimulate most of the neuronal elements, which are necessary in bringing full benefit of the CI device to recipients.

Effects of the Number of Channels and Channel Stimulation Rate on Speech Recognition and Sound Quality Using Precurved Electrode Arrays

PURPOSE

This study investigated the relationship between the number of active electrodes, channel stimulation rate, and their interaction on speech recognition and sound quality measures while controlling for electrode placement. Cochlear implant (CI) recipients with precurved electrode arrays placed entirely within scala tympani and closer to the modiolus were hypothesized to be able to utilize more channels and possibly higher stimulation rates to achieve better speech recognition performance and sound quality ratings than recipients in previous studies.

METHOD

Participants included seven postlingually deafened adult CI recipients with Advanced Bionics Mid-Scala electrode arrays confirmed to be entirely within scala tympani using postoperative computerized tomography. Twelve conditions were tested using four, eight, 12, and 16 electrodes and channel stimulation rates of 600 pulse per second (pps), 1,200 pps, and each participant's maximum allowable rate (1,245-4,800 pps). Measures of speech recognition and sound quality were acutely assessed.

RESULTS

For the effect of channels, results showed no significant improvements beyond eight channels for all measures. For the effect of channel stimulation rate, results showed no significant improvements with higher rates, suggesting that 600 pps was sufficient for maximum speech recognition performance and sound quality ratings. However, across all conditions, there was a significant relationship between mean electrode-to-modiolus distance and all measures, suggesting that a lower mean electrode-to-modiolus distance was correlated with higher speech recognition scores and sound quality ratings.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that even well-placed precurved electrode array recipients may not be able to take advantage of more than eight channels or higher channel stimulation rates (> 600 pps), but that closer electrode array placement to the modiolus correlates with better outcomes for these recipients.

Evaluating cochlear insertion trauma and hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CIPRES): a study protocol for a randomized single-blind controlled trial

Background

In order to preserve residual hearing in patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who receive a cochlear implant (CI), insertion trauma to the delicate structures of the cochlea needs to be minimized. The surgical approach comprises the conventional mastoidectomy-posterior tympanotomy (MPT) to arrive at the middle ear, followed by either a cochleostomy (CO) or the round window (RW) approach. Both techniques have their benefits and disadvantages. Another important aspect in structure preservation is the design of the electrode array. Two different designs are used: a “straight” lateral wall lying electrode array (LW) or a “pre-curved” perimodiolar lying electrode array (PM). Interestingly, until now, the best surgical approach and design of the implant is uncertain. Our hypothesis is that there is a difference in hearing preservation outcomes between the four possible treatment options.

Methods

We designed a monocenter, multi-arm, randomized controlled trial to compare insertion trauma between four groups of patients, with each group having a unique combination of an electrode array type (LW or PM) and surgical approach (RW or CO). In total, 48 patients will be randomized into one of these four intervention groups. Our primary objective is the comparison of postoperative hearing preservation between these four groups. Secondly, we aim to assess structure preservation (i.e., scalar translocation, with basilar membrane disruption or tip fold-over of array) for each group. Thirdly, we will compare objective outcomes of hearing and structure preservation by way of electrocochleography (ECochG).

Discussion

Cochlear implantation by way of a cochleostomy or round window approach, using different electrode array types, is the standard medical care for patients with severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, as it is a relatively simple and low-risk procedure that greatly benefits patients. However, loss of residual hearing remains a problem. This trial is the first randomized controlled trial that evaluates the effect of cochlear insertion trauma of several CI treatment options on hearing preservation.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register (NTR) NL8586. Registered on 4 May 2020. Retrospectively registered; 3/48 participants were included before registration.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05878-2.

Factors Influencing Speech Perception in Adults With a Cochlear Implant

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

The primary objective of this study is to identify the biographic, audiologic, and electrode position factors that influence speech perception performance in adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients implanted with a device from a single manufacturer. The secondary objective is to investigate the independent association of the type of electrode (precurved or straight) with speech perception.

A New CT Parameter for Predicting Residual Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: The "Basal Turn-Facial Ridge Angle"

OBJECTIVES

We suggest a simple measurement, called the "basal turn-facial ridge (BT-FR) angle," for determining the electrode insertion axis using preoperative temporal bone computed tomography (CT) to predict hearing preservation (HP) in cochlear implantation (CI).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Eighty-two ears that underwent CI between 2010 and 2018 were included. Ears with preoperative thresholds less than or equal to 80 dB HL at 125, 250, and 500 Hz were enrolled and grouped using the criteria of Skarżyński et al.: Group 1, complete or partial HP; Group 2, minimal HP or complete hearing loss.

INTERVENTION

All subjects underwent CI with soft surgery techniques through the round window approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The BT-FR angle is the angle between the basal turn line (BT-line), which is a straight line passing through the center of the longitudinal axis of the BT, and the facial ridge line, which is a straight line running from the endpoint of the BT-line to a point just above the facial ridge.

RESULTS

The BT-FR angle was 2.5 ± 2.9 degrees in Group 1 and -0.3 ± 2.7 degrees in Group 2 (p = 0.003). The angle and hearing loss showed a significant negative correlation (r = -0.401, p = 0.002). In multiple linear regression, "age at operation" (β coefficient 0.260; p = 0.001) and the "BT-FR angle" (-1.967; p = 0.001) were significant variables affecting the degree of residual hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The BT-FR angle, which can be measured simply, may be useful to predict residual HP after CI.

Audiologic Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Cochlear Malformations: A Comparative Analysis of Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Electrode Arrays

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations has been shown to be beneficial. The aims of this study are to evaluate open set word recognition outcomes among children with cochlear implants who have cochlear malformations, and to further assess if either the lateral wall (LW) or perimodiolar (PM) electrode arrays confer any performance outcome advantages.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Pediatric cochlear implant recipients with cochlear malformations who were implanted at our institution within the last 10 years and had speech perception scores were eligible for inclusion in the study. Potential participants were excluded if they had less than 1 year of listening experience with the cochlear implant or suspected cochlear nerve deficiency.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Most recent consonant-nucleus-consonant word score.

RESULTS

ANOVA analysis demonstrated that the type of cochlear malformation was significantly associated with speech perception outcome (p = 0.006). Those with IP2 malformations had significantly better word recognition outcomes than the remaining cochlear malformations. Array type (LW or PM) was not associated with better word recognition outcomes in long-term follow-up of patients with IP2 malformations (p = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

In children who have cochlear malformations, cochlear implantation results in varying word recognition outcomes based on the type of malformation. While the participants in this study demonstrated postoperative open set word recognition skills, those with IP2 malformations demonstrated the most benefit. Electrode type was not found to significantly impact outcomes in this cohort.

Scalar Translocation Comparison Between Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays - A Meta-Analysis

Objectives/Hypothesis

Two types of electrode arrays for cochlear implants (CIs) are distinguished: lateral wall and perimodiolar. Scalar translocation of the array can lead to intracochlear trauma by penetrating from the scala tympani into the scala vestibuli or scala media, potentially negatively affecting hearing performance of CI users. This systematic review compares the lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays with respect to scalar translocation.

Study Design

Systematic review.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were reviewed for studies published within the last 11 years. No other limitations were set. All studies with original data that evaluated the occurrence of scalar translocation or tip fold‐over (TF) with postoperative computed tomography (CT) following primary cochlear implantation in bilateral sensorineuronal hearing loss patients were considered to be eligible. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers.

Results

We included 33 studies, of which none were randomized controlled trials. Meta‐analysis of five cohort studies comparing scalar translocation between lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays showed that lateral wall arrays have significantly lower translocation rates (7% vs. 43%; pooled odds ratio = 0.12). Translocation was negatively associated with speech perception scores (weighted mean 41% vs. 55%). Tip fold‐over of the array was more frequent with perimodiolar arrays (X² = 6.8, P < .01).

Conclusions

Scalar translocation and tip fold‐overs occurred more frequently with perimodiolar arrays than with lateral wall arrays. In addition, translocation of the array negatively affects hearing with the cochlear implant. Therefore, if one aims to minimize clinically relevant intracochlear trauma, lateral wall arrays would be the preferred option for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope, 131:1358–1368, 2021

Matched Cohort Comparison Indicates Superiority of Precurved Electrode Arrays

OBJECTIVE

Characterize differences in adult cochlear implant outcomes and programming parameters for a straight (CI422/522) and a precurved (CI532) electrode array.

SETTING

Cochlear implant (CI) program at a tertiary otologic center.

PATIENTS

Fifty-eight adults were included in the study; 29 were implanted with CI422 or CI522 and 29 were implanted with CI532. Each CI532 recipient was matched to a CI422/522 recipient in terms of age and preoperative hearing thresholds for comparison purposes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) words, AzBio sentences, residual audiometric thresholds, and Speech Spatial Qualities (SSQ) questionnaire collected 6 months postoperatively were used to characterize outcomes. Pulse duration, maxima, impedances, and overall charge measurements were used to characterize programming parameters.

RESULTS

Postoperative unaided low frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) was significantly better for the CI532 group. CNC scores were significantly better for the CI532 group. Impedances and pulse duration were significantly lower for the CI532 group, but there was no difference in overall charge between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The CI532 group showed either similar or statistically superior results on all measures when compared with the CI422/522 suggesting that the CI532 electrode may be an advantageous substitute for the CI522.

Angular Electrode Insertion Depth and Speech Perception in Adults With a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review

Objective:

By discussing the design, findings, strengths, and weaknesses of available studies investigating the influence of angular insertion depth on speech perception, we intend to summarize the current status of evidence; and using evidence based conclusions, possibly contribute to the determination of the optimal cochlear implant (CI) electrode position.

Data Sources:

Our search strategy yielded 10,877 papers. PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to June 1, 2018. Both keywords and free-text terms, related to patient population, predictive factor, and outcome measurements were used. There were no restrictions in languages or year of publication.

Study Selection:

Seven articles were included in this systematic review. Articles eligible for inclusion: (a) investigated cochlear implantation of any CI system in adults with post-lingual onset of deafness and normal cochlear anatomy; (b) investigated the relationship between angular insertion depth and speech perception; (c) measured angular insertion depth on imaging; and (d) measured speech perception at, or beyond 1-year post-activation.

Data Extraction and Synthesis:

In included studies; quality was judged low-to-moderate and risk of bias, evaluated using a Quality-in-Prognostic-Studies-tool (QUIPS), was high. Included studies were too heterogeneous to perform meta-analyses, therefore, effect estimates of the individual studies are presented. Six out of seven included studies found no effect of angular insertion depth on speech perception.

Conclusion:

All included studies are characterized by methodological flaws, and therefore, evidence-based conclusions regarding the influence of angular insertion depth cannot be drawn to date.

Initial surgical and clinical experience with the Nucleus CI532 slim modiolar electrode in the UK

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this work is to describe the first experience in the UK with the slim pre-curved perimodiolar electrode Nucleus CI532 in a continuous series of patients in terms of surgical and clinical reliability and early performance outcomes.

METHOD

In this retrospective review we describe the complication rate (including electrode array tip fold-over), NRT thresholds, hearing preservation, power efficiency and CI performance outcomes in a continuous series of 40 cochlear implants CI532 performed between October 2016 and November 2017 in 17 adults and 13 children with severe to profound hearing loss.

RESULTS

Preliminary data from these groups reveals some low-frequency hearing preservation in the CI532 group although none of the patients were conventional hearing preservation candidates. NRT thresholds, power efficiency, and BKB sentences in quiet were measured at 3 and 6 months post activation. There were no significant differences in these results. The average BKB score in quiet increases from 22% pre-operatively to 58% at 3 months and 70% at 6 months. In addition, although hearing preservation was not an objective, low-frequency thresholds were preserved in 20% of cases at 3 and 6 months post-operatively. Complications were observed in 5 cases, one case with non-device related aerocoele and four related to the device array: two cases of tip roll over, one case of the electrode array being placed extra-cochlea, and one case with the electrode buckling into the middle ear. The last 2 cases were dealt with per-operatively.

DISCUSSION

Our preliminary results with the CI532 implant indicate that it may be reliably placed with standard surgical techniques but care is needed during the deployment of the electrode. Further initial data suggest that switch on and early electrophysiological measures are comparable to the existing CI 512 device. However whilst preliminary, our data suggest that it may be possible to use this electrode for hearing preservation. However, further studies are required to determine its definitive advantage over other electrode designs.

CONCLUSION

CI532 is a reliable device offering good initial results and could be an option for hearing preservation although further studies are required.

Evaluation of Outcome Variability Associated With Lateral Wall, Mid-scalar, and Perimodiolar Electrode Arrays When Controlling for Preoperative Patient Characteristics

OBJECTIVE

Determine the impact of electrode array selection on audiometric performance when controlling for baseline patient characteristics.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective evaluation of a prospective cochlear implant (CI) database (January 1, 2012-May 31, 2017).

SETTING

Tertiary Care University Hospital.

PATIENTS

Three hundred twenty-eight adult CI recipients.

INTERVENTIONS/MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURED

Hearing outcomes were measured through unaided/aided pure tone thresholds and speech recognition testing before and after cochlear implantation. All reported postoperative results were performed at least 6 months after CI activation. All device manufacturers were represented.

RESULTS

Of the 328 patients, 234 received lateral wall (LW) arrays, 46 received perimodiolar (PM) arrays, and 48 received mid-scalar (MS) arrays. Patients receiving PM arrays had significantly poorer preoperative earphone and aided PTAs and SRTs, and aided Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant(CNC) word and AzBio +10 SNR scores compared with patients receiving LW arrays (all p ≤ 0.04), and poorer PTAs and AzBio +10 SNR scores compared with MS recipients (all p ≤ 0.02). No preoperative audiological variables were found to significantly differ between MS and LW patients. After controlling for preoperative residual hearing and speech recognition ability in a hierarchical multiple regression analysis, no statistically significant difference in audiological outcomes was detected (CNC words, AzBio quiet, or AzBio +10 SNR) among the three electrode array types (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

While previous studies have demonstrated superior postoperative speech recognition scores in LW electrode array recipients, these differences lose significance when controlling for baseline hearing and speech recognition ability. These data demonstrate the proclivity for implanting individuals with greater residual hearing with LW electrodes and its impact on postoperative results.

Challenging aspects of contemporary cochlear implant electrode array design

Objective

A design comparison of current perimodiolar and lateral wall electrode arrays of the cochlear implant (CI) is provided. The focus is on functional features such as acoustic frequency coverage and tonotopic mapping, battery consumption and dynamic range. A traumacity of their insertion is also evaluated.

Methods

Review of up-to-date literature.

Results

Perimodiolar electrode arrays are positioned in the basal turn of the cochlea near the modiolus. They are designed to initiate the action potential in the proximity to the neural soma located in spiral ganglion. On the other hand, lateral wall electrode arrays can be inserted deeper inside the cochlea, as they are located along the lateral wall and such insertion trajectory is less traumatic. This class of arrays targets primarily surviving neural peripheral processes. Due to their larger insertion depth, lateral wall arrays can deliver lower acoustic frequencies in manner better corresponding to cochlear tonotopicity. In fact, spiral ganglion sections containing auditory nerve fibres tuned to low acoustic frequencies are located deeper than 1 and half turn inside the cochlea. For this reason, a significant frequency mismatch might be occurring for apical electrodes in perimodiolar arrays, detrimental to speech perception. Tonal languages such as Mandarin might be therefore better treated with lateral wall arrays. On the other hand, closer proximity to target tissue results in lower psychophysical threshold levels for perimodiolar arrays. However, the maximal comfort level is also lower, paradoxically resulting in narrower dynamic range than that of lateral wall arrays. Battery consumption is comparable for both types of arrays.

Conclusions

Lateral wall arrays are less likely to cause trauma to cochlear structures. As the current trend in cochlear implantation is the maximal protection of residual acoustic hearing, the lateral wall arrays seem more suitable for hearing preservation CI surgeries. Future development could focus on combining the advantages of both types: perimodiolar location in the basal turn extended to lateral wall location for higher turn locations.

Damage to inner ear structure during cochlear implantation: Correlation between insertion force and radio-histological findings in temporal bone specimens

Cochlear implant insertion should be as least traumatic as possible in order to reduce trauma to the cochlear sensory structures. The force applied to the cochlea during array insertion should be controlled to limit insertion-related damage. The relationship between insertion force and histological traumatism remains to be demonstrated. Twelve freshly frozen cadaveric temporal bones were implanted with a long straight electrodes array through an anterior extended round window insertion using a motorized insertion tool with real-time measurement of the insertion force. Anatomical parameters, measured on a pre-implantation cone beam CT scan, position of the array and force metrics were correlated with post-implantation scanning electron microscopy images and histological damage assessment. An atraumatic insertion occurred in six cochleae, a translocation in five cochleae and a basilar membrane rupture in one cochlea. The translocation always occurred in the 150- to 180-degree region. In the case of traumatic insertion, different force profiles were observed with a more irregular curve arising from the presence of an early peak force (30 ± 18.2 mN). This corresponded approximately to the first point of contact of the array with the lateral wall of the cochlea. Atraumatic and traumatic insertions had significantly different force values at the same depth of insertion (p < 0.001, two-way ANOVA), and significantly different regression lines (y = 1.34x + 0.7 for atraumatic and y = 3.37x + 0.84 for traumatic insertion, p < 0.001, ANCOVA). In the present study, the insertion force was correlated with the intracochlear trauma. The 150- to 180-degree region represented the area at risk for scalar translocation for this straight electrodes array. Insertion force curves with different sets of values were identified for traumatic and atraumatic insertions; these values should be considered during motorized insertion of an implant so as to be able to modify the insertion parameters (e.g axis of insertion) and facilitate preservation of endocochlear structures.

Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child

OBJECTIVE

To compare stimulation parameters of peri-modiolar and anti-modiolar electrode arrays using two surgical approaches.

METHODS

Impedance, stimulation thresholds, comfortably loud current levels, electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds were compared between 2 arrays implanted in the same child at 5 time points: surgery, activation/day 1, week 1, and months 1 and 3. The peri-modiolar array was implanted via cochleostomy in all children (n = 64), while the anti-modiolar array was inserted via a cochleostomy in 43 children and via the round window in 21 children.

RESULTS

The anti-modiolar array had significantly lower impedance, but required higher current levels to elicit thresholds, comfort, electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds than the peri-modiolar array across all time points, particularly in basal electrodes (p < 0.05). The prevalence of open electrodes was similar in anti-modiolar (n = 5) and peri-modiolar (n = 3) arrays.

CONCLUSION

Significant but clinically acceptable differences in stimulation parameters between peri-modiolar and anti-modiolar arrays persisted four months after surgery in children using bilateral cochlear implants. The surgical approach used to insert the anti-modiolar array had no overall effect on outcomes.

The Role of Electrode Placement in Bilateral Simultaneously Cochlear-Implanted Adult Patients

Objective

To evaluate the influence of the electrode placement on hearing performance in adult patients who were simultaneously and bilaterally cochlear implanted.

Study Design

Case series with planned data collection.

Setting

Tertiary referral university centers.

Subjects and Methods

The postoperative computed tomography scan was studied for 19 patients who were simultaneously and bilaterally implanted with a long straight electrode array. The size of the cochlea was measured in consideration of the major cochlear diameter and cochlear height. The electrode-to-modiolus distance for the electrodes positioned at 180 and 360 degrees and the angular depth of insertion of the array were also measured. Speech perception was assessed at 1 and 5 years postimplantation with disyllabic word lists in quiet and in noise, with the speech coming from the front and a background noise (cocktail party) coming from 5 loudspeakers.

Results

At 1 year postimplantation, the electrode-to-modiolus distance at 180 degrees was correlated with the speech perception scores in both quiet and noise. In patients with a full electrode insertion, no correlation was found between the angular depth of insertion and hearing performance. The speech perception scores in noise gradually declined as a function of the number of inserted and active electrodes. No relationship between electrode position and speech perception scores was found at 5 years postimplantation.

Conclusion

In adult patients who were simultaneously and bilaterally implanted, the use of a long straight array, the full electrode array insertion, and the proximity to the modiolus might be determining factors to obtain the best speech performance at 1 year, without influence on the speech perception scores after long-term use.