Preliminary Results With Image-guided Cochlear Implant Insertion Techniques

Curvature analysis of CI electrode arrays: a novel approach to categorize perimodiolar positions without anatomical landmarks

PURPOSE

Perimodiolar electrode arrays may be positioned regular, over-inserted or under-inserted into the cochlea depending on the cochlear size and shape. The study aimed to examine whether there are differences between these groups in the local curvature along the intracochlear array. Individual curvature variables were developed to categorize the groups and the relationship between the curvature and the angular insertion depth at the electrode tip was analyzed.

METHODS

The curvature along the intracochlear array was measured in the CBCT image of 85 perimodiolar electrodes of a single type. The mean curvature and the ratio of the mean curvature at contacts E14-16 to the mean curvature at E7-8 (bowing ratio) were calculated across the array, and its true positive rate (TPR) and false positive rate (FPR) were calculated to establish optimal threshold values to categorize the groups.

RESULTS

68.2% of the cases were categorized as regular positioned, 22.4% had an over-insertion and 9.4% had an under-insertion. The mean curvature was significantly weaker with under-insertion (< 342°) than with normal insertion depth (≥ 342°). With an over-insertion, the bowing ratio was < 1 and otherwise > 1. Both the mean curvature and bowing ratio were found to have an optimal threshold value with high TPR (= 1.00) and low FPR (≤ 0.06) for categorizing under-insertion and over-insertion, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Curvature analysis is a useful tool to assess if a perimodiolar electrode array has been inserted deep enough into the cochlea. Independent of critical anatomical landmarks, over-inserted arrays and under-inserted arrays could be well categorized by using individual curvature variables. The results need to be validated using additional data sets.

Evaluation of Real-Time Intracochlear Electrocochleography for Guiding Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Position

This study evaluates intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) for real-time monitoring during cochlear implantation. One aim tested whether adjusting the recording electrode site would help differentiate between atraumatic and traumatic ECochG amplitude decrements. A second aim assessed whether associations between ECochG amplitude decrements and post-operative hearing loss were weaker when considering hearing sensitivity at the ECochG stimulus frequency compared to a broader frequency range. Eleven adult cochlear implant recipients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation participated. Single-frequency (500-Hz) ECochG was performed during cochlear implantation; the amplitude of the first harmonic of the difference waveform was considered. Post-operative hearing preservation at 500 Hz ranged from 0 to 94%. The expected relationship between ECochG amplitude decrements and hearing preservation was observed, though the trend was not statistically significant, and predictions were grossly inaccurate for two participants. Associations did not improve when considering alternative recording sites or hearing sensitivity two octaves above the ECochG stimulus frequency. Intracochlear location of a moving recording electrode is a known confound to real-time interpretation of ECochG amplitude fluctuations, which was illustrated by the strength of the correlation with ECochG amplitude decrements. Multiple factors contribute to ECochG amplitude patterns and to hearing preservation; these results highlight the confounding influence of intracochlear recording electrode location on the ECochG.

Otological Planning Software-OTOPLAN: A Narrative Literature Review

The cochlear implant (CI) is a widely accepted option in patients with severe to profound hearing loss receiving limited benefit from traditional hearing aids. CI surgery uses a default setting for frequency allocation aiming to reproduce tonotopicity, thus mimicking the normal cochlea. One emerging instrument that may substantially help the surgeon before, during, and after the surgery is a surgical planning software product developed in collaboration by CASCINATION AG (Bern, Switzerland) and MED-EL (Innsbruck Austria). The aim of this narrative review is to present an overview of the main features of this otological planning software, called OTOPLAN®. The literature was searched on the PubMed and Web of Science databases. The search terms used were "OTOPLAN", "cochlear planning software" "three-dimensional imaging", "3D segmentation", and "cochlear implant" combined into different queries. This strategy yielded 52 publications, and a total of 31 studies were included. The review of the literature revealed that OTOPLAN is a useful tool for otologists and audiologists as it improves preoperative surgical planning both in adults and in children, guides the intraoperative procedure and allows postoperative evaluation of the CI.

Min-Max Similarity: A Contrastive Semi-Supervised Deep Learning Network for Surgical Tools Segmentation

A common problem with segmentation of medical images using neural networks is the difficulty to obtain a significant number of pixel-level annotated data for training. To address this issue, we proposed a semi-supervised segmentation network based on contrastive learning. In contrast to the previous state-of-the-art, we introduce Min-Max Similarity (MMS), a contrastive learning form of dual-view training by employing classifiers and projectors to build all-negative, and positive and negative feature pairs, respectively, to formulate the learning as solving a MMS problem. The all-negative pairs are used to supervise the networks learning from different views and to capture general features, and the consistency of unlabeled predictions is measured by pixel-wise contrastive loss between positive and negative pairs. To quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate our proposed method, we test it on four public endoscopy surgical tool segmentation datasets and one cochlear implant surgery dataset, which we manually annotated. Results indicate that our proposed method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art semi-supervised and fully supervised segmentation algorithms. And our semi-supervised segmentation algorithm can successfully recognize unknown surgical tools and provide good predictions. Also, our MMS approach could achieve inference speeds of about 40 frames per second (fps) and is suitable to deal with the real-time video segmentation.

Survey of selective electrode deactivation attitudes and practices by cochlear implant audiologists

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to explore clinician attitudes regarding selective electrode deactivation and to investigate the primary methodology used to identify poorly encoded electrodes, deactivate identified electrodes, and measure outcomes.

METHODS

An online survey consisting of 32 questions was administered to certified clinical and research cochlear implant (CI) audiologists. Questions asked participants about their demographic information, device programming patterns, and attitudes regarding selective electrode deactivation.

RESULTS

Fifty-four audiologists completed the survey. When asked whether they believed selectively deactivating poorly encoded electrodes could improve speech perception outcomes, 43% of respondents selected 'Probably Yes,' 39% selected 'Definitely Yes,' and 18% selected 'Might or Might Not.' Of those who reported deactivating electrodes as part of CI programming, various methodology was reported to identify and deactivate poorly encoding electrodes and evaluate effectiveness of deactivation. General reasons against deactivation were also reported.

DISCUSSION

CI audiologists generally believed selective electrode deactivation could be used to improve speech perception outcomes for patients; however, few reported implementing selective electrode deactivation in practice. Among those who do perform selective electrode deactivation, the reported methodology was highly variable.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the need for clinical practice guidelines to assist audiologists in performing selective electrode deactivation.

Robotic pullback technique of a precurved cochlear-implant electrode array using real-time impedance sensing feedback

PURPOSE

During traditional insertion of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays (EAs), surgeons rely on limited tactile feedback and visualization of the EA entering the cochlea to control the insertion. One insertion approach for precurved EAs involves slightly overinserting the EA and then retracting it slightly to achieve closer hugging of the modiolus. In this work, we investigate whether electrical impedance sensing could be a valuable real-time feedback tool to advise this pullback technique.

METHODS

Using a to-scale 3D-printed scala tympani model, a robotic insertion tool, and a custom impedance sensing system, we performed experiments to assess the bipolar insertion impedance profiles for a cochlear CI532/632 precurved EA. Four pairs of contacts from the 22 electrode contacts were chosen based on preliminary testing and monitored in real time to halt the robotic insertion once the closest modiolar position had been achieved but prior to when the angular insertion depth (AID) would be reduced.

RESULTS

In this setting, the open-loop robotic insertion impedance profiles were very consistent between trials. The exit of each contact from the external stylet of this EA was clearly discernible on the impedance profile. In closed-loop experiments using the pullback technique, the average distance from the electrode contacts to the modiolus was reduced without greatly affecting the AID by using impedance feedback in real time to determine when to stop EA retraction.

CONCLUSION

Impedance sensing, and specifically the access resistance component of impedance, could be a valuable real-time feedback tool in the operating room during CI EA insertion. Future work should more thoroughly analyze the effects of more realistic operating room conditions and inter-patient variability on this technique.

Image-Guided Cochlear Implant Programming: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review studies evaluating clinically implemented image-guided cochlear implant programing (IGCIP) and to determine its effect on cochlear implant (CI) performance.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for English language publications from inception to August 1, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Included studies prospectively compared intraindividual CI performance between an image-guided experimental map and a patient's preferred traditional map. Non-English studies, cadaveric studies, and studies where imaging did not directly inform programming were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Seven studies were identified for review, and five reported comparable components of audiological testing and follow-up times appropriate for meta-analysis. Demographic, speech, spectral modulation, pitch accuracy, and quality-of-life survey data were collected. Aggregate data were used when individual data were unavailable.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Audiological test outcomes were evaluated as standardized mean change (95% confidence interval) using random-effects meta-analysis with raw score standardization. Improvements in speech and quality-of-life measures using the IGCIP map demonstrated nominal effect sizes: consonant-nucleus-consonant words, 0.15 (-0.12 to 0.42); AzBio quiet, 0.09 (-0.05 to 0.22); AzBio +10 dB signal-noise ratio, 0.14 (-0.01 to 0.30); Bamford-Kowel-Bench sentence in noise, -0.11 (-0.35 to 0.12); Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, -0.14 (-0.28 to 0.00); and Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale, 0.13 (-0.02 to 0.28). Nevertheless, 79% of patients allowed to keep their IGCIP map opted for continued use after the investigational period.

CONCLUSION

IGCIP has potential to precisely guide CI programming. Nominal effect sizes for objective outcome measures fail to reflect subjective benefits fully given discordance with the percentage of patients who prefer to maintain their IGCIP map.

Cochlear implantation in an animal model documents cochlear damage at the tip of the implant

INTRODUCTION

Electrocochleography has recently emerged as a diagnostic tool in cochlear implant surgery, purposing hearing preservation and optimal electrode positioning.

OBJECTIVE

In this experimental study, extra-cochlear potentials were obtained during cochlear implant surgery in guinea pigs. The aim was to determine electrophysiological changes indicating cochlear trauma after cochleostomy and after electrode implantation in different insertion depths.

METHODS

Normal-hearing guinea pigs (n = 14) were implanted uni- or bilaterally with a multichannel electrode. The extra-cochlear cochlear nerve action potentials were obtained in response to acoustic stimuli at specific frequencies before and after cochleostomy, and after introduction of the electrode bundle. After the electrophysiological experiments, the guinea pigs were euthanized and microtomography was performed, in order to determine the position of the electrode and to calculate of the depth of insertion. Based on the changes of amplitude and thresholds in relation to the stimulus frequency, the electrophysiological data and the position obtained by the microtomography reconstruction were compared.

RESULTS

Cochleostomy promoted a small electrophysiological impact, while electrode insertion caused changes in the amplitude of extra-cochlear electrophysiological potentials over a wide range of frequencies, especially in the deepest insertions. There was, however, preservation of the electrical response to low frequency stimuli in most cases, indicating a limited auditory impact in the intraoperative evaluation. The mean insertion depth of the apical electrodes was 5339.56 μm (±306.45 - 6 inserted contacts) and 4447.75 μm (±290.23 - 5 inserted contacts).

CONCLUSIONS

The main electrophysiological changes observed during surgical procedures occurred during implantation of the electrode, especially the deepest insertions, whereas the cochleostomy disturbed the potentials to a lesser extent. While hearing loss was often observed apical to the cochlear implant, it was possible to preserve low frequencies after insertion.

Real-Time Data-Driven Approach for Prediction and Correction of Electrode Array Trajectory in Cochlear Implantation

Cochlear implants provide hearing perception to people with severe to profound hearing loss. The electrode array (EA) inserted during the surgery directly stimulates the hearing nerve, bypassing the acoustic hearing system. The complications during the EA insertion in the inner ear may cause trauma leading to infection, residual hearing loss, and poor speech perception. This work aims to reduce the trauma induced during electrode array insertion process by carefully designing a sensing method, an actuation system, and data-driven control strategy to guide electrode array in scala tympani. Due to limited intra-operative feedback during the insertion process, complex bipolar electrical impedance is used as a sensing element to guide EA in real time. An automated actuation system with three degrees of freedom was used along with a complex impedance meter to record impedance of consecutive electrodes. Prediction of EA direction (medial, middle, and lateral) was carried out by an ensemble of random forest, shallow neural network, and k-nearest neighbour in an offline setting with an accuracy of 86.86%. The trained ensemble was then utilized in vitro for prediction and correction of EA direction in real time in the straight path with an accuracy of 80%. Such a real-time system also has application in other electrode implants and needle and catheter insertion guidance.

Robotics, automation, active electrode arrays, and new devices for cochlear implantation: A contemporary review

In the last two decades, cochlear implant surgery has evolved into a minimally invasive, hearing preservation surgical technique. The devices used during surgery have benefited from technological advances that have allowed modification and possible improvement of the surgical technique. Robotics has recently gained popularity in otology as an effective tool to overcome the surgeon's limitations such as tremor, drift and accurate force control feedback in laboratory testing. Cochlear implantation benefits from robotic assistance in several steps during the surgical procedure: (i) during the approach to the middle ear by automated mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy or through a tunnel from the postauricular skin to the middle ear (i.e. direct cochlear access); (ii) a minimally invasive cochleostomy by a robot-assisted drilling tool; (iii) alignment of the correct insertion axis on the basal cochlear turn; (iv) insertion of the electrode array with a motorized insertion tool. In recent years, the development of bone-attached parallel robots and image-guided surgical robotic systems has allowed the first successful cochlear implantation procedures in patients via a single hole drilled tunnel. Several other robotic systems, new materials, sensing technologies applied to the electrodes, and smart devices have been developed, tested in experimental models and finally some have been used in patients with the aim of reducing trauma in cochleostomy, and permitting slow and more accurate insertion of the electrodes. Despite the promising results in laboratory tests in terms of minimal invasiveness, reduced trauma and better hearing preservation, so far, no clinical benefits on residual hearing preservation or better speech performance have been demonstrated. Before these devices can become the standard approach for cochlear implantation, several points still need to be addressed, primarily cost and duration of the procedure. One can hope that improvement in the cost/benefit ratio will expand the technology to every cochlear implantation procedure. Laboratory research and clinical studies on patients should continue with the aim of making intracochlear implant insertion an atraumatic and reversible gesture for total preservation of the inner ear structure and physiology.

Hybrid active shape and deep learning method for the accurate and robust segmentation of the intracochlear anatomy in clinical head CT and CBCT images

Purpose: Robust and accurate segmentation methods for the intracochlear anatomy (ICA) are a critical step in the image-guided cochlear implant programming process. We have proposed an active shape model (ASM)-based method and a deep learning (DL)-based method for this task, and we have observed that the DL method tends to be more accurate than the ASM method while the ASM method tends to be more robust. Approach: We propose a DL-based U-Net-like architecture that incorporates ASM segmentation into the network. A quantitative analysis is performed on a dataset that consists of 11 cochlea specimens for which a segmentation ground truth is available. To qualitatively evaluate the robustness of the method, an experienced expert is asked to visually inspect and grade the segmentation results on a clinical dataset made of 138 image volumes acquired with conventional CT scanners and of 39 image volumes acquired with cone beam CT (CBCT) scanners. Finally, we compare training the network (1) first with the ASM results, and then fine-tuning it with the ground truth segmentation and (2) directly with the specimens with ground truth segmentation. Results: Quantitative and qualitative results show that the proposed method increases substantially the robustness of the DL method while having only a minor detrimental effect (though not significant) on its accuracy. Expert evaluation of the clinical dataset shows that by incorporating the ASM segmentation into the DL network, the proportion of good segmentation cases increases from 60/177 to 119/177 when training only with the specimens and increases from 129/177 to 151/177 when pretraining with the ASM results. Conclusions: A hybrid ASM and DL-based segmentation method is proposed to segment the ICA in CT and CBCT images. Our results show that combining DL and ASM methods leads to a solution that is both robust and accurate.

Fully automated segmentation in temporal bone CT with neural network: a preliminary assessment study

BACKGROUND

Segmentation of important structures in temporal bone CT is the basis of image-guided otologic surgery. Manual segmentation of temporal bone CT is time- consuming and laborious. We assessed the feasibility and generalization ability of a proposed deep learning model for automated segmentation of critical structures in temporal bone CT scans.

METHODS

Thirty-nine temporal bone CT volumes including 58 ears were divided into normal (n = 20) and abnormal groups (n = 38). Ossicular chain disruption (n = 10), facial nerve covering vestibular window (n = 10), and Mondini dysplasia (n = 18) were included in abnormal group. All facial nerves, auditory ossicles, and labyrinths of the normal group were manually segmented. For the abnormal group, aberrant structures were manually segmented. Temporal bone CT data were imported into the network in unmarked form. The Dice coefficient (DC) and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) were used to evaluate the accuracy of automatic segmentation.

RESULTS

In the normal group, the mean values of DC and ASSD were respectively 0.703, and 0.250 mm for the facial nerve; 0.910, and 0.081 mm for the labyrinth; and 0.855, and 0.107 mm for the ossicles. In the abnormal group, the mean values of DC and ASSD were respectively 0.506, and 1.049 mm for the malformed facial nerve; 0.775, and 0.298 mm for the deformed labyrinth; and 0.698, and 1.385 mm for the aberrant ossicles.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed model has good generalization ability, which highlights the promise of this approach for otologist education, disease diagnosis, and preoperative planning for image-guided otology surgery.

Automatic Segmentation of Intracochlear Anatomy in MR Images Using a Weighted Active Shape Model

There is evidence that cochlear MR signal intensity may be useful in prognosticating the risk of hearing loss after middle cranial fossa (MCF) resection of acoustic neuroma (AN), but the manual segmentation of this structure is difficult and prone to error. This hampers both large-scale retrospective studies and routine clinical use of this information. To address this issue, we present a fully automatic method that permits the segmentation of the intra-cochlear anatomy in MR images, which uses a weighted active shape model we have developed and validated to segment the intra-cochlear anatomy in CT images. We take advantage of a dataset for which both CT and MR images are available to validate our method on 132 ears in 66 high-resolution T2-weighted MR images. Using the CT segmentation as ground truth, we achieve a mean Dice (DSC) value of 0.81 and 0.79 for the scala tympani (ST) and the scala vestibuli (SV), which are the two main intracochlear structures.Clinical Relevance- The proposed method is accurate and fully automated for MR image segmentation. It can be used to support large retrospective studies that explore relations between MR signal in preoperative images and outcomes. It can also facilitate the routine and clinical use of this information.

Atraumatic Insertion of a Cochlear Implant Pre-Curved Electrode Array by a Robot-Automated Alignment with the Coiling Direction of the Scala Tympani

INTRODUCTION

Electrode array translocation is an unpredictable event with all types of arrays, even using a teleoperated robot in a clinical scenario. We aimed to compare the intracochlear trauma produced by the HiFocus™ Mid-Scala (MS) electrode array (Advanced Bionics, Valencia, CA, USA) using a teleoperated robot, with an automated robot connected to a navigation system to align the pre-curved tip of the electrode array with the coiling direction of the scala tympani (ST).

METHODS

Fifteen freshly frozen temporal bones were implanted with the MS array using the RobOtol® (Collin, Bagneux, France). In the first group (n = 10), the robot was teleoperated to insert the electrode array into the basal turn of the ST under stereomicroscopic vision, and then the array was driven by a slow-speed hydraulic insertion technique with an estimated placement of the pre-curved electrode tip. In the second group (n = 5), 3 points were obtained from the preoperative cone-beam computed tomography: the 2 first defining the ST insertion axis of the basal turn and a third one at the center of the ST at 270°. They provided the information to the automated system (RobOtol® connected with a navigation system) to automatically align the electrode array with the ST insertion axis and to aim the pre-curved tip toward the subsequent coiling of the ST. After this, the electrode array was manually advanced. Finally, the cochleae were obtained and fixed in a crystal resin, and the position of each electrode was determined by a micro-grinding technique.

RESULTS

In all cases, the electrode array was fully inserted into the cochlea and the depth of insertion was similar using both techniques. With the teleoperated robotic technique, translocations of the array were observed in 7/10 insertions (70%), but neither trauma nor array translocation occurred with automated robotic insertion.

CONCLUSION

We have successfully tested an automated insertion system (robot + navigation) that could accurately align a pre-curved electrode array to the axis of the basal turn of the ST and its subsequent coiling, which reduced intracochlear insertion trauma and translocation.

Determination of the Round Window Niche Anatomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Imaging as Preparatory Work for Individualized Drug-Releasing Implants

Modern therapy of inner ear disorders is increasingly shifting to local drug delivery using a growing number of pharmaceuticals. Access to the inner ear is usually made via the round window membrane (RWM), located in the bony round window niche (RWN). We hypothesize that the individual shape and size of the RWN have to be taken into account for safe reliable and controlled drug delivery. Therefore, we investigated the anatomy and its variations. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 50 patients were analyzed. Based on the reconstructed 3D volumes, individual anatomies of the RWN, RWM, and bony overhang were determined by segmentation using 3D Slicer^TM with a custom build plug-in. A large individual anatomical variability of the RWN with a mean volume of 4.54 mm³ (min 2.28 mm³, max 6.64 mm³) was measured. The area of the RWM ranged from 1.30 to 4.39 mm² (mean: 2.93 mm²). The bony overhang had a mean length of 0.56 mm (min 0.04 mm, max 1.24 mm) and the shape was individually very different. Our data suggest that there is a potential for individually designed and additively manufactured RWN implants due to large differences in the volume and shape of the RWN.

Robot-assisted Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion in Adults: A Comparative Study With Manual Insertion

OBJECTIVE

To describe the first cochlear array insertions using a robot-assisted technique, with different types of straight or precurved electrode arrays, compared with arrays manually inserted into the cochlea.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary otologic center.

PATIENTS

Twenty cochlear implantations in the robot-assisted group and 40 in the manually inserted group.

INTERVENTIONS

Cochlear implantations using a robot-assisted technique (RobOtol) with straight (eight Cochlear CI522/622, and eight Advanced Bionics Hifocus Slim J) or precurved (four Advanced Bionics Hifocus Mid-Scala) matched to manual cochlear implantations. Three-dimensional reconstruction images of the basilar membrane and the electrode array were obtained from pre- and postimplantation computed tomography.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rate and localization of scalar translocations.

RESULTS

For straight electrode arrays, scalar translocations occurred in 19% (3/16) of the robot-assisted group and 31% (10/32) of the manually inserted group. Considering the number of translocated electrodes, this was lower in the robot-assisted group (7%) than in the manually inserted group (16%) (p < 0.0001, χ2 test). For precurved electrode arrays, scalar translocations occurred in 50% (2/4) of the robot-assisted group and 38% (3/8) of the manually inserted group.

CONCLUSION

This study showed a safe and reliable insertion of different electrode array types with a robot-assisted technique, with a less traumatic robotic insertion of straight electrode arrays when compared with manual insertion.

A Micro-Computed Tomography Study of Round Window Anatomy and Implications for Atraumatic Cochlear Implant Insertion

HYPOTHESIS

The goal of this study was to interrogate high-resolution three-dimensional reconstructions of round window anatomy to illustrate and characterize structural variability with implications for atraumatic cochlear implant insertion.

BACKGROUND

Cochlear implants are increasingly used to improve sound detection in patients with substantial residual hearing. However, traumatic cochlear implant insertion through the round window involving upward deviation of the electrode into the spiral ligament, basilar membrane, and osseous spiral lamina, medial impaction on the modiolus, or interscalar excursion into the scala vestibuli are associated with lower rates of hearing preservation and poorer speech perception.Successful atraumatic insertion is dependent on an anatomical understanding of the middle and inner ear. The round window bony niche lacks distinct demonstrable anatomical landmarks for the position of the round window membrane, and there is limited guidance on the amount of bony overhang that can be safely drilled away. A greater understanding of the anatomical variation around the round window could enhance treatment efficacy.

METHODS

Fourteen human cadaver temporal bones were imaged using microcomputed tomography. Resulting scans were digitally reconstructed, segmented, and measured.

RESULTS

Round window niche walls vary substantially in size and projection. Round window average short diameter measured 1.30 mm (range 1.07-1.44), and is limited by the crista fenestrae at the inferoanterior margin of the round window. Crista fenestrae size and morphology varied considerably. Reconstructions with solid and translucent panels are presented.

CONCLUSION

Anatomical heterogeneity should be considered in cochlear implant selection, drilling, and choice of insertion vector.

Insertion Depth for Optimized Positioning of Precurved Cochlear Implant Electrodes

HYPOTHESIS

Generic guidelines for insertion depth of precurved electrodes are suboptimal for many individuals.

BACKGROUND

Insertion depths that are too shallow result in decreased cochlear coverage, and ones that are too deep lift electrodes away from the modiolus and degrade the electro-neural interface. Guidelines for insertion depth are generically applied to all individuals using insertion depth markers on the array that can be referenced against anatomical landmarks.

METHODS

To normalize our measurements, we determined the optimal position and insertion vector where a precurved array best fits the cochlea for each patient in an IRB-approved, N = 131 subject CT database. The distances from the most basal electrode on an optimally placed array to anatomical landmarks, including the round window (RW) and facial recess (FR), was measured for all patients.

RESULTS

The standard deviations of the distance from the most basal electrode to the FR and RW are 0.65 mm and 0.26 mm, respectively. Owing to the high variability in FR distance, using the FR as a landmark to determine insertion depth results in >0.5 mm difference with ideal depth in 44% of cases. Alignment of either of the two most proximal RW markers with the RW would result in over-insertion failures for >80% of cases, whereas the use of the third, most medial marker would result in under-insertion in only 19% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Normalized measurements using the optimized insertion vector show low variance in distance from the basal electrode position to the RW, thereby suggesting it as a better landmark for determining insertion depth than the FR.

Radiologic anatomy of the round window relevant to cochlear implantation and inner ear drug delivery

Objective

To determine anatomic relationships and variation of the round window membrane to bony surgical landmarks on computed tomography.

Study design

Retrospective imaging review.

Methods

100 temporal bone images were evaluated. Direct measurements were obtained for membrane position. Vector distances and angulation from umbo and bony annulus were calculated from image viewer software coordinates.

Results

The angle of round window membrane at junction with cochlear basal turn was (42.1 ± 8.6)°. The membrane's position relative to plane of the facial nerve through facial recess was (14.7 ± 5.2)° posterior from a reference line drawn through facial recess to carotid canal. Regarding transtympanic drug delivery, the round window membrane was directed 4.1 mm superiorly from the inferior annulus and 5.4 mm anteriorly from the posterior annulus. The round window membrane on average was angled superiorly from the inferior annulus (77.1 ± 27.9)° and slightly anteriorly from the posterior annulus (19.1 ± 11.1°). The mean distance of round window membrane from umbo was 4 mm and posteriorly rotated 30° clockwise from a perpendicular drawn from umbo to inferior annulus towards posterior annulus. Together, these measurements approximate the round window membrane in the tympanic membrane's posteroinferior quadrant.

Conclusions

These radiologic measurements demonstrate normal variations seen in round window anatomy relative to facial recess approach and bony tympanic annulus, providing a baseline to assess round window insertion for cochlear implantation and outlines anatomic factors affecting transtympanic drug delivery.

Custom mastoid-fitting templates to improve cochlear implant electrode insertion trajectory

PURPOSE

Insertion trajectory affects final intracochlear cochlear implant (CI) positioning, but limited information is available intraoperatively regarding ideal trajectory. We sought to improve intracochlear positioning CI electrodes using custom templates to specify insertion trajectory.

METHODS

3D reconstructions were created from computed tomography of three cadaveric temporal bones. Trajectories co-planar with the straight segment of the cochlea's basal turn were considered ideal. Templates were designed to fit against the drilled mastoid's surface and convey this guided trajectory via a hollow cylinder. Templates were 3D-printed using stereolithography. Mastoidectomy was performed. Template accuracy was tested by measuring target registration error (TRE) for four templates. A novel, roller-based insertion tool (designed to fit within the template cylinder) constrained insertions to intended trajectories. Insertions were performed with MED-EL Standard electrodes in three bones with three conditions: guided trajectory with insertion tool, non-guided trajectory with insertion tool and guided trajectory with surgical forceps. For the final condition, the template was used to mark the mastoid to convey trajectory. Insertion was stopped when electrode buckling occurred.

RESULTS

TRE ranged from 0.23 to 0.73 mm. Mean TRE ± standard deviation was 0.55 ± 0.19 mm. Insertions along guided versus non-guided trajectories averaged more intracochlear electrodes (9, 8, 8 vs. 7, 7, 8) and greater angular insertion depths (AID) (377°, 341°, 320° vs. 278°, 302°, 290°). Insertions performed with forceps using templates as a guide also achieved excellent results (intracochlear electrodes: 10, 7, 8; AID: 478°, 318°, 333°). No translocations occurred.

CONCLUSION

Custom mastoid-fitting templates reliably specify intended insertion trajectory and provide sufficient information for recreation of that trajectory with manual insertion after template removal. The templates can accurately target structures within the temporal bone with a TRE of 0.55 ± 0.19 mm. Our roller-based insertion tool achieves results comparable to manual insertion using surgical forceps.

Potential insertion complications with cochlear implant electrodes

Objectives: The aim of this discussion paper and literature review was to estimate the incidence of a variety of complications associated with the surgical placement of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays and to discuss the implications and management of sub-optimal electrode placement. Results: A review of the peer-reviewed literature suggests that the incidence of incomplete electrode insertion and kinking is more prevalent in straight arrays and not more than about 2% in CI recipients with normal cochlear anatomy/patency. Incidence of tip fold-over is greater with perimodiolar arrays but also occurs with straight arrays and is typically less than 5%. Conversely, electrode migration is more common with straight arrays, and high rates (up to 46%) have been reported in some studies. Scalar translocations have also been reported for both perimodiolar and straight arrays. Higher rates have been reported for stylet-based perimodiolar electrodes inserted via cochleostomy (up to 56%), but with much lower rates (<10%) with both sheath-based perimodiolar arrays and lateral wall arrays. Electrode positioning complications represent a significant proportion of perioperative CI complications and compromise the level of benefit from the device. Careful surgical planning and appropriate pre- and intraoperative imaging can reduce the likelihood and impact of electrode positioning complications. There is also evidence that newer array designs are less prone to certain complications, particularly scalar translocation. Conclusions: It is important that implanting surgeons are aware of the impact of sub-optimal electrode placement and the steps that can be taken to avoid, identify and manage such complications.

Characterizing Insertion Pressure Profiles During Cochlear Implantation: Simultaneous Fluoroscopy and Intracochlear Pressure Measurements

BACKGROUND

Combined electrical-acoustical stimulation (EAS) has gained popularity as patients with residual hearing are increasingly undergoing cochlear implantation. Preservation of residual hearing correlates with hearing outcomes, but loss of hearing occurs in a subset of these patients. Several mechanisms have been proposed as causing this hearing loss; we have previously described high amplitude pressure transients, equivalent to high-level noise exposures, in the inner ear during electrode insertion. The source of these transients has not been identified.

METHODS

Cadaveric human heads were prepared with an extended facial recess. Fiber-optic pressure sensors were inserted into the scala vestibuli and scala tympani to measure intracochlear pressures. Two cochlear implant (CI) electrode styles (straight and perimodiolar) were inserted during time-synced intracochlear pressures and video fluoroscopy measurements.

RESULTS

CI electrode insertions produced pressure transients in the cochlea up to 160 to 170 dB pSPL equivalent for both styles, consistent with previous results. However, the position of the electrode within the cochlea when transients were generated differed (particularly contact with the medial or lateral walls).

CONCLUSIONS

These results begin to elucidate the insertion pressure profiles of CI electrodes, which can be used to improve CI electrode designs and facilitate "silent-insertions" to improve chances of hearing preservation.

Further Evidence of the Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Electrode Positioning and Hearing Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Postoperative imaging studies by numerous groups have revealed that final cochlear implant (CI) electrode position impacts audiological outcomes with scalar location consistently shown to be a significant factor. Modiolar proximity has been less extensively studied, and findings regarding the effect of insertion depth have been inconsistent.

METHODS

Using previously developed automated algorithms, we determined CI electrode position in an Institutional Review Board-approved database of 220 CI ears. Generalized linear models (GLM) were used to analyze the relationship between audiological outcomes and factors including age, duration of CI use, device type, and electrode position.

RESULTS

For precurved arrays, GLM revealed that scalar position, modiolar proximity, base insertion depth, and sex were significant factors for Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) words (R = 0.43, p < 0.001, n = 92 arrays), while scalar position, modiolar proximity, age, and postlingual onset of deafness were significant for Bamford-Kawal-Bench Sentences in Noise (BKB-SIN) (R = 0.51, p < 0.001, n = 85) scores. Other factors were not significant in the final model after controlling for these variables. For straight arrays, we found the insertion depth, postlingual deafness, and length of CI use to be highly significant (R = 0.47, p < 0.001) factors for CNC words (91 arrays), while for BKB-SIN scores the most significant (R = 0.47, p < 0.001) factors were insertion depth, younger age, and postlingual deafness (89 arrays).

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm the significance of electrode positioning in audiological outcomes. The most significant positional predictors of outcome for precurved arrays were full scala tympani (ST) insertion and the modiolar distance, while for the lateral wall arrays the depth of insertion was the most significant factor.

Human Otopathology of Cochlear Implant Drill-out Procedures

OBJECTIVE

Human otopathology following drill-out procedures for cochlear implantation (CI) in cases with labyrinthitis ossificans (LO) has not been previously described. This study uses the high sensitivity of histopathology to (1) evaluate surgical drill-out technique with associated intracochlear findings and (2) quantify spiral ganglion neuron populations in a series of patients with LO who underwent CI.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective otopathology study.

SETTING

Otopathology laboratory.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Temporal bone (TB) specimens from cases with evidence of preoperative intracochlear fibroossification that required a drill-out procedure for CI electrode array insertion were included. All cases were histopathologically evaluated and 3-dimensional reconstructions of the cochleae were performed to interpret drilling paths and electrode trajectories.

RESULTS

Five TB specimens were identified, of which 4 underwent drill-out of the basal turn of the cochlea and 1 underwent a radical cochlear drill-out. In multiple TBs, drilling was imprecise with resultant damage to essential structures. Two TBs showed injury to the modiolus, which was associated with substantially decreased or even absent neuronal populations within these areas. In addition, 2 cases with inadequate drill-out or extensive LO of the basal turn resulted in extracochlear placement of electrode arrays into the vestibule due to persistent obstruction within the basal turn.

CONCLUSION

Otopathology highlights the challenges of drill-out procedures in cases of LO. Imprecise drilling paths, due to distortion of normal cochlear anatomy, risk injury to the modiolus and adjacent neurons as well as extracochlear placement of electrode arrays, both of which may contribute to poorer hearing outcomes.