Comparison of Opioid Prescription Patterns and Consumption Following Otologic Surgery

Analgesia After Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery in Europe-Potential for Reduction of Postoperative Opioid Usage

OBJECTIVE

Excessively prescribed opioids promote chronic drug abuse and worsen a highly prevalent public health problem in the era of the opioid epidemic. This study aimed to (a) determine general analgesic prescription patterns after surgery for vestibular schwannoma (VS) with a focus on opioid prescription rates, (b) identify risk factors for receiving narcotics for postoperative pain management, and (c) highlight the feasibility of opioid-free analgesic treatment strategies.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 105 adult inpatients who underwent VS surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Analgesic prescription patterns were evaluated, and factors associated with opioid prescriptions were identified.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Number of prescribed analgesics.

RESULTS

Metamizole (=dipyrone) and acetaminophen (=paracetamol) were the most frequently prescribed non-opioid drugs. Sixty-three (60%) patients received an opioid with a median intake of 23.2 ± 24 mg of oral morphine equivalents. Only 10 (9.5%) individuals received opioids for longer than postoperative day 1. Subjects with small tumors undergoing middle cranial fossa tumor removal (p = 0.007) were more likely to receive opioid drugs. In contrast, patients undergoing retrosigmoid craniotomy required fewer opioids for pain control (p = 0.004). Furthermore, individuals receiving opioids were prone to obtain higher dosages of acetaminophen (odds ratio 1.054, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.10, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Opioids for acute postoperative analgesia after VS surgery may be necessary in many patients. However, middle- and long-term pain control can be accomplished using non-opioid treatment regimens, resulting in a reduction in opioid prescriptions and the accompanying negative effects on individual and public health.

Pain Control after Otologic Surgery: Do Nonopioid Analgesics Suffice?

OBJECTIVE

Investigate whether nonopioid analgesics (NOA) provide adequate pain control after otologic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter cohort.

SETTING

Two quaternary academic medical centers.

PATIENTS

Patients over 12 years old who underwent otologic surgery involving the middle ear and/or mastoid at two centers over a 5-month period.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were prescribed acetaminophen and ibuprofen postoperatively and instructed to contact the surgical team if pain control was inadequate, in which case an opioid medication was prescribed. Level of pain and medication use were assessed with a standardized questionnaire, 1 week after surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative pain levels during the first week after surgery (0-10); proportion of patients requiring opioid medication.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were included. Of these, 37% underwent tympanomastoidectomy, 27% cochlear implant, 19.5% postauricular tympanoplasty, 10.5% transcanal tympanoplasty, and 6% had a different surgery. The median of the average level of pain in the first 7 days was 5/10 (IQR 3-6). The median highest level of pain was 5 (IQR 4-8). The median current level of pain was 3 (IQR 1-5). Seven patients (10%) required breakthrough opioid pain medication. The remaining 90% utilized NOA only. One week after surgery, 60% were taking nonopioid analgesics only while the remaining 40% were not taking any pain medication at all. Although opioids were required infrequently, there were no significant differences in medication use between the two centers.

CONCLUSIONS

NOA provide adequate pain control for most patients after middle ear and mastoid otologic surgery. Opioid analgesics do not routinely need to be prescribed.

Opioid Prescribing Patterns Following Lateral Skull Base Spontaneous Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Repair

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the opioid prescribing patterns for and requirements of patients undergoing repair of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (sCSF) leaks of the lateral skull base.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Adults with lateral skull base sCSF leaks who underwent repairs between September 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Mean morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) of opioids dispensed to inpatients and prescribed at discharge, additional pain control medications dispensed, and outpatient additional opioid requests were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of 78 patients included, 46 (59%) underwent repair via a transmastoid (TM), 6 (7.7%) via a middle cranial fossa (MCF), and 26 (33.3%) via a combined TM-MCF approach. Inpatients received a mean of 21.3, 31.4, and 37.6 MMEs per day during admission for the TM, MCF, and combined TM-MCF approaches, respectively ( p = 0.019, ηp 2 = 0.101). Upon discharge, nearly all patients (n = 74, 94.9%) received opioids; 27.3, 32.5, and 37.6 MMEs per day were prescribed after the TM, MCF, and TM-MCF approaches, respectively ( p = 0.015, ηp 2 = 0.093). Five (6.4%) patients requested additional outpatient pain medication, after which three were prescribed 36.7 MMEs per day. Patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension required significantly more inpatient MMEs than those without (41.5 versus 25.2, p = 0.02, d = 0.689), as did patients with a history of headaches (39.6 versus 23.6, p = 0.042, d = 0.684).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing sCSF leak repair via the MCF or TM-MCF approaches are prescribed more opioids postoperatively than patients undergoing the TM approach. Patients with a history of headaches or idiopathic intracranial hypertension might require more opioids postoperatively.

Prednisone Decreases Opioid Use in Adults Undergoing Benign Oropharyngeal Surgery

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to analyze the efficacy and safety of postoperative prednisone to reduce reliance on opioids in adult benign oropharyngeal surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single tertiary-care facility.

METHODS

Patients undergoing tonsillectomy (T), tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A), and/or modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) from December 2020 to January 2023 received the standard of care postoperative management. A prednisone taper was dependent on surgeon preference. Cohorts were based on the prescription of postoperative steroids. Patients completed a survey to assess opioid usage, pain scores, and steroid compliance.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were included. The nonsteroid cohort (N = 29) received an average of 467 ± 94.1 morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and the steroid cohort (N = 43) received an average of 285 ± 128 MME (P < 0.001). The nonsteroid cohort consumed 1.62 times more opioids than the steroid cohort (P < 0.002). There were no significant differences in complication or refill rates between treatment groups. There were no significant differences in pain scores on the day of surgery or postoperative days 1, 5, or 10 (P = 0.34, P = 0.66, P = 0.62, and P = 0.22, respectively). Patients undergoing T&A (p = 0.019) or who had current psychiatric medication use (P < 0.006) consumed significantly more opioids. Patients who received a total opioid prescription of >300 MME (40 5-mL doses of 5 mg/5 mL liquid oxycodone) consumed 2.27 times more postoperative opioids than patients with opioid prescriptions ≤300 MME (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients who did not receive steroids consumed 1.62 times more postoperative opioids compared to those who completed a steroid taper. Corticosteroid use was not associated with changes in pain scores, refill rates, or complication rates and may be considered in a multimodal approach to pain management in adults undergoing benign oropharyngeal surgery, although further study is warranted.

Perioperative opioids and survival outcomes in resectable head and neck cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Opioids are a mainstay in pain control for oncologic surgery. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the associations of perioperative opioid use with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with resectable head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL between 2000 and 2022 was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies investigating perioperative opioid use for patients with HNC undergoing surgical resection and its association with OS and DFS were included.

RESULTS

Three thousand three hundred seventy-eight studies met initial inclusion criteria, and three studies representing 562 patients (intraoperative opioids, n = 463; postoperative opioids, n = 99) met final exclusion criteria. One study identified that high intraoperative opioid requirement in oral cancer surgery was associated with decreased OS (HR = 1.77, 95% CI 0.995-3.149) but was not an independent predictor of decreased DFS. Another study found that increased intraoperative opioid requirements in treating laryngeal cancer was demonstrated to have a weak but statistically significant inverse relationship with DFS (HR = 1.001, p = 0.02) and OS (HR = 1.001, p = 0.02). The last study identified that patients with chronic opioid after resection of oral cavity cancer had decreased DFS (HR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.1-6.6) compared to those who were not chronically using opioids postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

An association may exist between perioperative opioid use and OS and DFS in patients with resectable HNC. Additional investigation is required to further delineate this relationship and promote appropriate stewardship of opioid use with adjunctive nonopioid analgesic regimens.

Adaptive interventions for opioid prescription management and consumption monitoring

OBJECTIVES

While opioid addiction, treatment, and recovery are receiving attention, not much has been done on adaptive interventions to prevent opioid use disorder (OUD). To address this, we identify opioid prescription and opioid consumption as promising targets for adaptive interventions and present a design framework.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the framework, we designed Smart Prescription Management (SPM) and Smart Consumption Monitoring (SCM) interventions. The interventions are evaluated using analytical modeling and secondary data on doctor shopping, opioid overdose, prescription quality, and cost components.

RESULTS

SPM was most effective (30-90% improvement, for example, prescriptions reduced from 18 to 1.8 per patient) for extensive doctor shopping and reduced overdose events and mortality. Opioid adherence was improved and the likelihood of addiction declined (10-30%) as the response rate to SCM was increased. There is the potential for significant incentives ($2267-$3237) to be offered for addressing severe OUD.

DISCUSSION

The framework and designed interventions adapt to changing needs and conditions of the patients to become an important part of global efforts in preventing OUD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper on adaptive interventions for preventing OUD by addressing both prescription and consumption.

CONCLUSION

SPM and SCM improved opioid prescription and consumption while reducing the risk of opioid addiction. These interventions will assist in better prescription decisions and in managing opioid consumption leading to desirable outcomes. The interventions can be extended to other substance use disorders and to study complex scenarios of prescription and nonprescription opioids in clinical studies.

Multimodal Analgesia and Patient Education Reduce Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Otology

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to validate alternative pain management strategies that can reduce reliance on opioids for postoperative pain management in otology.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single tertiary-care facility.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent outpatient otologic surgery from September 2021 to July 2022 were randomized into treatment cohorts. The opioid monotherapy cohort received a standard opioid prescription. The multimodal analgesia cohort received the same opioid prescription, prescriptions for acetaminophen and naproxen, and additional pain management education with a flyer on discharge. All patients completed a questionnaire 1 week after surgery to evaluate opioid usage and pain scores.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients completed the study. The opioid monotherapy cohort (n = 42) and multimodal analgesia cohort (n = 44) were prescribed an average of 42.1 ± 20.4 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and 38.4 ± 5.7 MME, respectively (p = 0.373). Four patients (9.52%) in the opioid monotherapy cohort required opioid refills compared to 1 patient (2.27%) in the multimodal analgesia cohort (p = 0.156). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the multimodal analgesia cohort consumed significantly fewer opioids on average than the opioid monotherapy cohort (11.9 ± 15.9 MME vs 22.8 ± 28.0 MME, respectively). There were no significant differences in postoperative rehospitalizations (p = 0.317) or Emergency Department visits (p = 0.150). Pain scores on the day of surgery, postoperative day (POD) 1, POD3, and POD7 were not significantly different between cohorts (p = 0.395, 0.896, 0.844, 0.765, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The addition of patient education, acetaminophen, and naproxen to postoperative opioid prescriptions significantly reduced opioid consumption without affecting pain scores, refill rates, or complication rates after otologic surgery.

Opioid Prescribing Trends After Major Pediatric Ear Surgery: A 12-Year Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative opioid prescriptions tend to exceed children's analgesic needs, but awareness of the opioid epidemic may have driven changes in prescribing behaviors. This study evaluated opioid prescribing patterns after major pediatric ear surgery.

METHODS

This study reviewed all cases of tympanoplasty, tympanomastoidectomy, mastoidectomy, cochlear implantation, otoplasty, and aural atresia repair at a pediatric hospital during 2010-2021. Regressions were conducted to identify opioid prescribing trends over time. Potential covariates were assessed. Returns to the system were reviewed as a balancing measure.

RESULTS

Even without a targeted protocol, opioid prescribing declined significantly. After prescribing peaked in 2012-2013, significant negative trends yielded lower rates of opioid prescriptions, fewer doses per prescription, smaller patient-weight-standardized dose sizes, and less variability (all p < 0.001). In 2012, 96.1% of patients received opioid prescriptions; the rate fell to 13.5% by 2021. For patients ages, 0-6, the annual rate of opioid prescriptions dropped from a maximum of 96.3% in 2012 to 0.0% in 2021. The annual average supply of doses per prescription decreased by 68% between 2013 and 2021, reducing the total days' supply to an evidence-based 3.1 ± 1.6 days. Regressions did not detect changes in returns to the system. Pain-related returns were rare (0.9%) and did not vary by opioid prescriptions (p = 0.37). Prescribing trends were closely correlated with a tonsillectomy-focused protocol that our institution implemented in 2019.

CONCLUSION

Surgeon-driven opioid stewardship has improved with no resultant change in revisit rates. Procedure-specific quality improvement interventions may have broader off-target effects on prescribing behaviors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV Laryngoscope, 2022.

Pain and Pain Control With Opioid and Nonopioid Medications After Otologic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively analyze pain and pain medication use following otologic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study with patient reported pain logs and medication use logs.

SETTING

Tertiary academic hospital.Patients: Sixty adults who underwent outpatient otologic surgeries.

INTERVENTIONS

Surveys detailing postoperative pain levels, nonopioid analgesic (NOA) use, and opioid analgesic use.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-reported pain scores, use of NOA, and use of opioid medications normalized as milligrams morphine equivalents (MME).

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients had surgery via a transcanal (TC) approach, and 28 patients had surgery via a postauricular (PA) approach. TC surgery had significantly lower reported pain scores than PA surgery on both postoperative day (POD) 1 (median pain score 2.2, IQR 0-5 vs. median pain score 4.8, IQR 3.4-6.3, respectively; p = 0.0013) and at POD5 (median pain score 0, IQR 0-0 vs. median pain score 2.0, IQR 0-3, respectively; p = 0.0002). Patients also used significantly fewer opioid medications with TC approach than patients who underwent PA approach at POD1 (median total MME 0, IQR 0-5 vs. median total MME 5.0, IQR 0-15, respectively; p = 0.03) and at POD5 (median total MME 0, IQR 0-0 vs. median total MME 0, IQR 0-5, respectively; p = 0.0012).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery with a postauricular approach is associated with higher pain and opioid use following otologic surgery. Patient- and approach-specific opioid prescribing is feasible following otologic surgery.

Otologic opioid usage and pain control in the postoperative period: An observational prospective study

PURPOSE

Evaluate opioid prescribing patterns, opioid consumption, and patient pain patterns following otologic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were included if they were ≥18 years old and received otologic surgery between November 2019 and August 2020. Patients were provided a survey which included a visual analog scale for recording their pain postoperatively and the amount of opioid they had remaining. Patients who did not complete all portions of the survey were excluded.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients completed the post-operative questionnaire. Collectively, patients were prescribed 5797 morphine milligram equivalents and used 3092: approximately 47% went unused. Of patients receiving a transcanal incision (n = 28/91, 31%), 70% went unused, whereas patients receiving a postauricular incision (n = 57/91, 63%), 38% went unutilized. The utilization difference between transcanal and postauricular cohorts was significant (p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, patients who received a postauricular incision had 60% more opioid usage (p < 0.001), whereas those with a transcanal incision had an average reduction of 40% in opioid usage (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant amount of opioid medication went unused in this study. Patients with postauricular incisions had significantly increased opioid utilization as compared to those with transcanal incisions. Otologists may be able to successfully manage pain in the postoperative period with a reduced opioid prescription multimodal analgesia and increased patient education. Further study is needed to support this suggestion.

Opioid Prescribing Patterns After Skull Base Surgery for Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

Excessive opioid prescription is a source of prescription diversion and could contribute to chronic opioid abuse. This study describes the opioid prescribing patterns and risk factors for additional opioid prescription after surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Single tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Adult VS patients undergoing surgical resection between May 2019 and March 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Opioid use postoperatively and up to 60 days following surgery were characterized from medical records and by querying the state-wide Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The presence of additional opioid prescriptions within 60 days of surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients (mean age 50 yrs, 65.5% female) were prescribed an average of 138.2 ± 117.8 mg of morphine equivalents (MME). Twenty-two (20.9%) required additional prescriptions of 163.2 ± 103.2 MME. Age, gender, tumor size, or surgical approach (translabyrinthine, retrosigmoid, versus middle fossa) were not associated with additional prescriptions. Patients with additional prescriptions had higher body mass index (BMI 28.8 vs. 25.8 kg/m2, p = 0.015) and required more opioid medications during hospitalization (51.8 vs. 29.1 MME, p = 0.002). On multivariate logistic regression, higher BMI (odds ratio [OR] 1.32; p = 0.001), history of headaches (OR 11.9, p = 0.011), and history of opioid use (OR 29.3, p = 0.008) were associated with additional prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional opioid prescriptions may be necessary in a portion of VS patients undergoing surgery. The choice of surgical approach is not associated with excess opioid requirements. Patients with higher BMI, history of headaches, or preoperative opioid use may require additional prescriptions.

Opioids Are Infrequently Required following Ambulatory Otologic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency with which postoperative opioid prescriptions are required after ambulatory otologic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary otology-neurotology practice.

PATIENTS

Patients (n = 447) given over-the-counter acetaminophen and ibuprofen following ambulatory otologic surgery between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2020.

INTERVENTION

Opioid prescription upon request.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient, disease, and surgical variables such as age, sex, past medical history, chronic pain condition, surgical procedure, primary versus (vs.) revision surgery, and endoscopic vs. microscopic approach were examined for relationship to ad hoc opioid prescription rate.

RESULTS

Of 370 adult patients (mean age 49.0 yrs, range 18.0-88.5 yrs), 75 (20.3%) were prescribed opioids for postoperative pain, most commonly oxycodone-acetaminophen 5/325 mg. Of 77 pediatric patients (mean age 8.8 yrs, range 0.7-17.9 yrs), 5 (6.5%) were prescribed postoperative opioid analgesia. In the adult population, chronic pain condition, pain medication use at baseline, canal wall up mastoidectomy, tympanoplasty, tympanomeatal flap, bone removal of the mastoid, postauricular incision, and intraoperative microscopy were independent predictors of opioid pain prescription. When controlling for all significant variables, only chronic pain condition remained significant (odds ratio = 3.94; p = 0.0007). In the pediatric population, atresiaplasty, meatoplasty, and conchal cartilage removal were independently associated with opioid prescription, but none remained significant when analyzed in a multivariate linear model.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain following ambulatory otologic surgery may be adequately managed with over-the-counter pain medications in the majority of cases. Opioids may be necessary in adults with preexisting pain conditions.

Opioid Prescriptions Following Otologic Surgery: A Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVE

To examine postoperative opioid-prescribing patterns following otologic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective population-based descriptive study.

SETTING

All hospitals in the Canadian province of Ontario.

METHODS

Of all patients with advanced ear surgery between July 1, 2012, and March 31, 2019, 7 cohorts were constructed: tympanoplasty with or without ossiculoplasty (n = 7812), atticotomy/limited mastoidectomy (n = 1371), mastoidectomy (n = 3717), semicircular canal occlusion (SCO; n = 179), stapedectomy (n = 2735), bone-implanted hearing aid insertion (n = 280), and cochlear implant (n = 2169). Prescriptions filled for narcotics postoperatively were calculated per morphine milligram equivalent (MME) opioid dose. Multivariable regression was used to determine predictors of higher opioid doses.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD MMEs prescribed were as follows: tympanoplasty with or without ossiculoplasty, 246.77 ± 1380.78; atticotomy/limited mastoidectomy, 283.32 ± 956.10; mastoidectomy, 280.56 ± 1018.50; SCO, 328.61 ± 1090.86; stapedectomy, 164.64 ± 657.18; bone-implanted hearing aid insertion, 326.11 ± 1054.66; and cochlear implant, 200.87 ± 639.93. SCO (odds ratio [OR], 1.69 [95% CI, 1.16-2.48]) and mastoidectomy (OR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.36-1.66]) were associated with higher opioid doses than tympanoplasty-ossiculoplasty. Asthma (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.12-1.38]), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.12-1.47]), myocardial infarction (OR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.05-1.68]), diabetes (OR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.08-1.39]), and substance-related and addictive disorders (OR, 2.59 [95% CI, 1.67-4.00]) were associated with higher opioid doses prescribed. Overall MME prescribed by year demonstrates a sharp drop from 2017-2018 to 2018-2019.

CONCLUSION

This large comprehensive population study provides insight into the prescribing patterns following otologic surgery. The large amounts prescribed and substantial variation require further study to determine barriers that limit good opioid-prescribing stewardship in the postoperative period.

Pain Management Following Otological Surgery: A Prospective Study of Different Strategies

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to prospectively assess pain and associated analgesic consumption after otological surgery comparing two prescription patterns.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective nonrandomized consecutive cohort study.

METHODS

125 adult patients undergoing ambulatory otologic surgery-cochlear implantation and endaural middle ear surgery, were assigned (according to surgeon's preference) and prospectively studied in two arms: 1) acetaminophen 500 mg + ibuprofen 400 mg; 2) acetaminophen 500 mg + codeine 30 mg. Pain levels, medication dose, disposal patterns of opioids, and suspected side effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients reported mild to moderate pain. There was a statistically significant reduction of pain from day to day, which was on average 0.26 lower than the day before. Sufficient pain control could be achieved with both drug regimens with no significant difference in pain levels. Only 50% of patients who were prescribed opioids used them. Additionally, the median tablet intake was 3 tablets while 10 to 20 tablets were prescribed. The majority of patients (97%) did not dispose of these drugs safely.

CONCLUSION

Adequate analgesia was achieved in both arms of this study. Pain control following otologic surgery with a combination of acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is recommended unless contraindications or chronic opioid use are present. If opioids such as codeine (30 mg) are prescribed, the amount should be reduced as low as possible, such as five tablets, based on our studied population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3-a prospective nonrandomized consecutive cohort study Laryngoscope, 2021.

Are Opioids Necessary in Middle Ear Surgery? Comparing the Transcanal and Postauricular Approach

OBJECTIVE

Understand opioid-prescribing patterns in otologic surgery and the difference in opioid use between transcanal and postauricular surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective survey.

SETTING

Multihospital network.

PATIENTS

All patients undergoing otologic surgery from March 2017 to January 2019.

INTERVENTION

Patients undergoing otologic surgery were surveyed regarding postoperative opioid use and their level of pain control. Patients were divided by surgical approach (transcanal vs. postauricular). Those who underwent mastoid drilling were excluded. Narcotic amounts were converted to milligram morphine equivalents (MME) for analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Amount of opioid was calculated and compared between the two groups. Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square testing were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were included in the analysis; of these 18 (33%) had a postauricular incision. There was no difference in age (p = 0.85) or gender (p = 0.5) between the two groups. The mean amount of opioid prescribed (MME) in the postauricular and transcanal groups was 206.4 and 143 (p = 0.038) while the mean amount used was 37.7 and 37.5 (p = 0.29) respectively. There was no difference in percentage of opioid used (p = 0.44) or in patient-reported level of pain control (p = 0.49) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients in both the transcanal and postauricular groups used only a small portion of their prescribed opioid. There was no difference in the amount of opioid used or the patient's reported level of pain control based on the approach. Otologic surgeons should be aware of these factors to reduce narcotic diversion after ear surgery.

Reducing opioid use in post-operative otolaryngology patients: A quality improvement project

PURPOSE

In opioid-naive patients, many low-risk surgical procedures are associated with an increased risk of chronic opioid use. The goal of this quality improvement project was to reduce the amount of opioid prescriptions after commonly performed surgeries in otolaryngology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pre-intervention opioid prescribing state was measured using anonymous provider and patient surveys, as well as pharmacy provider prescription data. Next, this information was used to develop an opioid prescription protocol that both standardized opioid prescribing practices and encouraged multimodal analgesia following routine surgery. Finally, post-intervention data were gathered and compared to pre-intervention data to assess changes in prescribing patterns.

RESULTS

By patient survey, the worst pain and average pain after surgery (scale of 1-10) were unchanged after the intervention (5.1 to 4.8, p = 0.52; 4.1 to 3.6, p = 0.35, respectively). Post-intervention, 41% of patients reported receiving no opiates, whereas pre-intervention 100% of patients surveyed received opiates. The amount of ibuprofen and acetaminophen prescribed post-intervention increased 113% and 71%, respectively. By survey, the average number of opioid doses decreased from 24.0 ± 7.0 to 18.4 ± 6.6 (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a standardized physician opioid prescription protocol did not affect patient pain perceptions, resulted in an increase in multimodal analgesia prescription, and increased provider awareness of opioid over prescription.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Opioid Prescribing for Analgesia After Common Otolaryngology Operations

OBJECTIVE

Opioid use disorder (OUD), which includes the morbidity of dependence and mortality of overdose, has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. Overprescription of opioids can lead to chronic use and misuse, and unused narcotics after surgery can lead to their diversion. Research supports that most patients do not take all the prescribed opioids after surgery and that surgeons are the second largest prescribers of opioids in the United States. The introduction of opioids in those with OUD often begins with prescription opioids. Reducing the number of extra opioids available after surgery through smaller prescriptions, safe storage, and disposal should reduce the risk of opioid use disorder in otolaryngology patients and their families.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this specialty-specific guideline is to identify quality improvement opportunities in postoperative pain management of common otolaryngologic surgical procedures. These opportunities are communicated through clear actionable statements with explanation of the support in the literature, evaluation of the quality of the evidence, and recommendations on implementation. Employing these action statements should reduce the variation in care across the specialty and improve postoperative pain control while reducing risk of OUD. The target patients for the guideline are any patients treated for anticipated or reported pain within the first 30 days after undergoing common otolaryngologic procedures. The target audience of the guideline is otolaryngologists who perform surgery and clinicians who manage pain after surgical procedures. Outcomes to be considered include whether the patient has stopped using opioids, has disposed of unused opioids, and was satisfied with the pain management plan.The guideline addresses assessment of the patient for OUD risk factors, counseling on pain expectations, and identifying factors that can affect pain duration and/or severity. It also discusses the use of multimodal analgesia as first-line treatment and the responsible use of opioids. Last, safe disposal of unused opioids is discussed.This guideline is intended to focus on evidence-based quality improvement opportunities judged most important by the guideline development group. It is not a comprehensive guide on pain management in otolaryngologic procedures. The statements in this guideline are not intended to limit or restrict care provided by clinicians based on their experiences and assessments of individual patients.

ACTION STATEMENTS

The guideline development group made strong recommendations for the following key action statements: (3A) prior to surgery, clinicians should identify risk factors for opioid use disorder when analgesia using opioids is anticipated; (6) clinicians should advocate for nonopioid medications as first-line management of pain after otolaryngologic surgery; (9) clinicians should recommend that patients (or their caregivers) store prescribed opioids securely and dispose of unused opioids through take-back programs or another accepted method.The guideline development group made recommendations for the following key action statements: (1) prior to surgery, clinicians should advise patients and others involved in the postoperative care about the expected duration and severity of pain; (2) prior to surgery, clinicians should gather information specific to the patient that modifies severity and/or duration of pain; (3B) in patients at risk for OUD, clinicians should evaluate the need to modify the analgesia plan; (4) clinicians should promote shared decision making by informing patients of the benefits and risks of postoperative pain treatments that include nonopioid analgesics, opioid analgesics, and nonpharmacologic interventions; (5) clinicians should develop a multimodal treatment plan for managing postoperative pain; (7) when treating postoperative pain with opioids, clinicians should limit therapy to the lowest effective dose and the shortest duration; (8A) clinicians should instruct patients and caregivers how to communicate if pain is not controlled or if medication side effects occur; (8B) clinicians should educate patients to stop opioids when pain is controlled with nonopioids and stop all analgesics when pain has resolved; (10) clinicians should inquire, within 30 days of surgery, whether the patient has stopped using opioids, has disposed of unused opioids, and was satisfied with the pain management plan.

Is otologic surgery contributing to the opioid epidemic?

Background

The opioid epidemic is a significant public health crisis challenging the lives of North Americans. Interestingly, this problem does not exist to the same extent in Europe. Surgeons play a significant role in prescribing opioids, especially in the context of post-operative pain management. The aim of this study was to compare the post-surgical prescribing patterns of otologists comparing Canada and Austria.

Methods

An online questionnaire was sent to 33 Canadian and 32 Austrian surgeons, who perform otologic surgery on a regular basis. Surgeons were asked to answer some questions about their background as well as typical prescribing patterns for postoperative pain medication for different ear surgeries (cochlear implant, stapedotomy, tympanoplasty). In addition, surgeons were asked about the typical use of local anesthetics for pain control at the end of a procedure. Otologists gave an estimate how confident they were that their therapy and prescriptions provide sufficient pain control to their patients.

Results

Analysis of the returned questionnaires showed that opioids are more commonly prescribed in Canada than in Austria. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used for postoperative pain more regularly after ear surgery in Austria, as opposed to Canada. Some of the prescribed drugs by European otologists are not available in North America. The use of local anesthetics at the end of surgery is not common in Austria. Surgeons´ confidence that the prescribed pain medication was sufficient to control postoperative symptoms was higher in the group not prescribing opioids than in the group that did routinely prescribe opioids.

Conclusion

Prescribing patterns differ substantially between the two evaluated countries. This data suggests an opportunity to reduce opioid prescriptions after otologic surgeries. Studies to evaluate pain after these operations as well as efficacy of analgesics following ear surgery are an important next step.

Graphical abstract

National Trends in Opioid Prescriptions Following Outpatient Otologic Surgery, 2005-2017

OBJECTIVE

To describe opioid stewardship in ambulatory otologic surgery from 2005 to 2017.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive study of US private insurance claims.

SETTING

Nationwide deidentified private insurance claims database (Clinformatics DataMart; Optum).

METHODS

A total of 17,431 adult opioid-naïve outpatients were included in the study. Patients were identified from CPT-4 codes (Current Procedural Terminology, Fourth Edition) as having undergone middle ear or mastoid surgery. Multiple regression was used to determine sociodemographic and geographic predictors of postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed, including procedure type, year of procedure, age, sex, education, income level, and geographic region of the United States.

RESULTS

The mean prescribed perioperative dose over the examined period was 203.03 MMEs (95% CI, 200.27-205.79; 5-mg hydrocodone pill equivalents, 40.61). In multivariate analysis, patients undergoing mastoid surgery were prescribed more opioids than those undergoing middle ear surgery (mean difference, 39.89 MME [95% CI, 34.37-45.41], P < .01; 5-mg hydrocodone pill equivalents, 8.0). Men were prescribed higher doses than women (mean difference, 15.39 [95% CI, 9.87-20.90], P < .01; 5-mg hydrocodone pill equivalents, 3.1). Overall MMEs prescribed by year demonstrates a sharp drop in MMEs from 2015 to 2017.

CONCLUSION

While the amount of opioids prescribed perioperatively has declined in recent years, otologists should continue to be cognizant of potential overprescribing in light of previous studies of patients' relatively low opioid intake.