Cochlear Implants to Treat Deafness Caused by Vestibular Schwannomas

Brazilian Society of Otology task force - cochlear implant ‒ recommendations based on strength of evidence

OBJECTIVE

To make evidence-based recommendations for the indications and complications of Cochlear Implant (CI) surgery in adults and children.

METHODS

Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on cochlear implantation were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

The topics were divided into 2 parts: (1) Evaluation of candidate patients and indications for CI surgery; (2) CI surgery - techniques and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

CI is a safe device for auditory rehabilitation of patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss. In recent years, indications for unilateral hearing loss and vestibular schwannoma have been expanded, with encouraging results. However, for a successful surgery, commitment of family members and patients in the hearing rehabilitation process is essential.

Brazilian Society of Otology task force - Vestibular Schwannoma ‒ evaluation and treatment

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma.

METHODS

Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on vestibular schwannoma were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

The topics were divided into 2 parts: (1) Diagnosis - audiologic, electrophysiologic tests, and imaging; (2) Treatment - wait and scan protocols, surgery, radiosurgery/radiotherapy, and systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Decision making in VS treatment has become more challenging. MRI can diagnose increasingly smaller tumors, which has disastrous consequences for the patients and their families. It is important to develop an individualized approach for each case, which highly depends on the experience of each surgical team.

Cochlear Implantation in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma and Neurofibromatosis Type II

Cochlear implantation offers significantly better hearing outcomes than auditory brainstem implantation in patients with vestibular schwannoma. Neither the primary treatment modality nor the cause of the tumor (neurofibromatosis type 2 related or sporadic) seems to have a significant effect on hearing outcome with cochlear implantation. Some uncertainty remains regarding long-term hearing outcomes; however, cochlear implantation in vestibular schwannoma serves to offer patients, with a functioning cochlear nerve, the probability of open set speech discrimination with a consequent positive impact on quality of life.

Cochlear Implantation after Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma: Initial Hearing Improvement and Longevity of Hearing Restoration

OBJECTIVE

The following research question was asked: In patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) that underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and cochlear implantation, were improvements in hearing function observed, and what was the cochlear implant (CI) failure rate of in these patients?

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/Medline, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Web of Science articles without restrictions on publication dates were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria required that the article was a report, a series, or a retrospective review with individual case data available. Non-English articles were excluded. Inclusion criteria required that patients were with VS and underwent subsequent SRS and cochlear implantation. Patients receiving microsurgery or stereotactic radiotherapy on the ipsilateral ear were excluded from this study.

DATA EXTRACTION

Included studies were evaluated using full-text evaluation, and data on study characteristics (author names, gender), clinical data (syndromic information, SRS modality), hearing outcomes, and device failure were extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Means and averages were obtained for all continuous variables. Percentages were ascertained for all categorical variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients undergoing CI placement in VS treated with SRS achieved open-set speech perception (79.2%) or environmental sound awareness (6.8%). Twelve implants (20.3%) failed. Three patterns were associated with failure: 1) immediate-onset failure, 2) initial benefit with delayed failure, 3) poor local control with device explantation.

Efficacy of Cochlear Implantation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Related Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the results of cochlear implantation in subjects with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

University-based tertiary referral center.

SUBJECTS

Five subjects with NF2 and severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss.

INTERVENTION

Cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Surgical outcomes and audiometric performance after cochlear implantation.

RESULTS

Five subjects (3 female, 2 male) were included in the study. The mean age at the time of implantation was 54 years old (range 35-78 years). Follow-up after cochlear implantation averaged 38 months (range 21-106 months). In the 5 implanted ears, 2 had no prior treatment, 1 had undergone prior radiation therapy, 1 underwent prior microsurgical removal, and 1 underwent prior microsurgical removal with adjuvant radiation therapy. The mean ipsilateral VS dimensions at time of implantation were 14 mm × 7.2 mm × 6.1 mm (mediolateral × anteroposterior × craniocaudal). Following cochlear implant activation, all 5 subjects achieved sound awareness, open set speech recognition, and 4 continue to be daily users of the devices.

CONCLUSION

Cochlear implantation is a viable hearing rehabilitation option for subjects with NF2 and severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. All subjects reported benefit with their cochlear implant, including open set speech recognition, enhanced lip-reading skills and environmental awareness of sound. Four subjects continued to demonstrate improved open-set speech recognition at the time of their last evaluations.

Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Patients With Retrocochlear Pathology: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature regarding cochlear implantation in patients with retrocochlear pathologies and extract speech perception scores between 6 months and 1 year after surgery.

DATABASES REVIEWED

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL via Ovid, CINAHL Complete via Ebsco, and Web of Science.

METHODS

The review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Search strategies included keywords and subject headings to maximize retrieval and reflect cochlear implants and retrocochlear pathologies. Patients with previously resected vestibular schwannoma (VS) were excluded.

RESULTS

There were 2,524 abstracts screened against inclusion criteria, and 53 studies were included, with individual data available for 171 adult patients. Pathologies included were either observed or irradiated VS (previously operated tumors were excluded) (n = 99, 57.9%), superficial siderosis (n = 39, 22.8%), neurosarcoidosis (n = 11, 6.4%), and previous central nervous system or skull base radiation (n = 22, 12.9%). Mean (standard deviation) postoperative consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word scores were 45.4% (24.2) for observed VS, 44.4% (20.8) for irradiated VS, 43.6% (21.0) for superficial siderosis, 89.5% (3.0) for neurosarcoidosis, and 30.0% (30.2) in patients with previous central nervous system or skull base irradiation. Irradiated compared with observed VS had similar postoperative CNC word scores (effect size, 0.06; p = 0.71). Age, sex, maximal tumor dimension, and neurofibromatosis type 2 status did not significantly impact cochlear implant performance in patients with VS. Eighty-two percent of patients with reported device usage were daily users, and overall, 82% of cases benefitted from cochlear implantation.

CONCLUSION

Cochlear implantation in patients with concomitant retrocochlear pathology generally results in improved speech discrimination scores sustained over time.

Cochlear Implantation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Experience From the UK Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Service

OBJECTIVE

To review the outcomes of cochlear implants (CI) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) in a large cohort, and identify factors associated with poor hearing benefit.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifteen-year retrospective national observational case series.

SETTING

United Kingdom regional NF2 multidisciplinary teams.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients with NF2 receiving a CI.

INTERVENTIONS

CI for hearing rehabilitation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

1) Audiometric performance at 9 to 12 months after implantation using City University of New York (CUNY) sentence recognition score, and Bamford- Kowal-Bench (BKB) word recognition score in quiet (BKBq), and in noise (BKBn). 2) CI use at most recent review.

RESULTS

Sixty four consecutive patients, median age 43 years, were included. Nine to 12 months mean audiometric scores were: CUNY 60.9%, BKBq 45.8%, BKBn 41.6%. There was no difference in audiometric outcomes between VS treatment modalities. At most recent review (median 3.6 years from implantation), 84.9% with device in situ/available data were full or part-time users. Between 9 and 12 months and most recent review there was an interval reduction in mean audiometric scores: CUNY -12.9%, BKBq -3.3%, BKBn -4.9%. Larger tumor size and shorter duration of profound hearing loss were the only variables associated with poorer audiometric scores. Tumor growth at the time of surgery was the only variable associated with CI non-use. Individual patient response was highly variable.

CONCLUSIONS

CI can provide significant and sustained auditory benefits to patients with NF2 independent of tumor treatment modality, with the majority of those implanted becoming at least part-time users. Larger datasets are required to reliably assess the role of independent variables.

Human vestibular schwannoma reduces density of auditory nerve fibers in the osseous spiral lamina

Hearing loss in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) is commonly attributed to mechanical compression of the auditory nerve, though recent studies suggest that this retrocochlear pathology may be augmented by cochlear damage. Although VS-associated loss of inner hair cells, outer hair cells, and spiral ganglion cells has been reported, it is unclear to what extent auditory-nerve peripheral axons are damaged in VS patients. Understanding the degree of damage VSs cause to auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) is important for accurately modeling clinical outcomes of cochlear implantation, which is a therapeutic option to rehabilitate hearing in VS-affected ears. A retrospective analysis of human temporal-bone histopathology was performed on archival specimens from the Massachusetts Eye and Ear collection. Seven patients met our inclusion criteria based on the presence of sporadic, unilateral, untreated VS. Tangential sections of five cochlear regions were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and adjacent sections were stained to visualize myelinated ANFs and efferent fibers. Following confocal microscopy, peripheral axons of ANFs within the osseous spiral lamina were quantified manually, where feasible, and with a "pixel counting" method, applicable to all sections. ANF density was substantially reduced on the VS side compared to the unaffected contralateral side. In the upper basal turn, a significant difference between the VS side and unaffected contralateral side was found using both counting methods, corresponding to the region tuned to 2000 Hz. Even spiral ganglion cells (SGCs) contralateral to VS were affected by the tumor as the majority of contralateral SGC counts were below average for age. This observation provides histological insight into the clinical observation that unilateral vestibular schwannomas pose a long-term risk of progression of hearing loss in the contralateral ear as well. Our pixel counting method for ANF quantification in the osseous spiral lamina is applicable to other pathologies involving sensorineural hearing loss. Future research is needed to classify ANFs into morphological categories, accurately predict their electrical properties, and use this knowledge to inform optimal cochlear implant programming strategies.

Cochlear Implantation in Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Literature Review

Objective  Ipsilateral cochlear implantation (CI) in vestibular schwannoma (VS) has been an emerging trend over the last two decades. We conducted the first systematic review of hearing outcomes comparing neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) and sporadic VS undergoing CI. A comparison of the two populations and predictor of outcome was assessed. This is an update to a previously presented study. Data Sources  Systemic data searches were performed in PubMed NCBI and Scopus by an academic librarian. No restrictions based on the year of publication were used. Study Selection  Studies were selected if patients had a diagnosis of NF2 and a CI placed in the affected side with reports of hearing outcome. Two independent reviewers screened each abstract and full-text article. Data Extraction  Studies were extracted at the patient level, and the assessment of quality and bias was evaluated according to the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool. Main Outcome Measures  Outcome predictors were determined by using the chi-square test and Student's t -test. Results  Overall, most CI recipients functioned in the high-to-intermediate performer category for both sporadic and NF2-related VS. Median AzBio (Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test) was 72% (interquartile range [IQR]: 50) in NF2 patients and 70% (IQR: 7.25) in sporadic patients. Larger tumor size predicted a poorer final audiometric outcome. Conclusions  Categorization of hearing outcome into superior performance and inferior performance based on sentence recognition revealed a generally good hearing outcome regardless of treatment or patient population. Select patients with sporadic and NF2 VS may benefit from CI.

Cochlear implantation after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

The object of this study was to ascertain outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS).

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients with VS treated with SRS who underwent CI between 1990 and 2019 at a single tertiary care referral center. Patient demographics, tumor features, treatment parameters, and pre- and postimplantation audiometric and clinical outcomes are presented.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (18 ears) underwent SRS and ipsilateral CI during the study period. Thirteen patients (76%) had neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Median age at SRS and CI were 44 and 48 years, respectively. Median time from SRS to CI was 60 days, but notably, 4 patients underwent SRS and CI within 1 day and 5 patients underwent CI more than 7 years after SRS. Median marginal dose was 13 Gy. Median treatment volume at the time of SRS was 1400 mm3 (range 84-6080 mm3, n = 15 patients). Median post-CI PTA was 28 dB HL, improved from 101 dB HL preoperatively (p < 0.001). Overall, 11 patients (12 ears) exhibited open-set speech understanding. Sentence testing was performed at a median of 10 months (range 1-143 months) post-CI. The median AzBio sentence score for patients with open-set speech understanding was 76% (range 19%-95%, n = 10 ears). Two ears exhibited Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) sentence scores of 49% and 95%, respectively. Four patients achieved environmental sound awareness without open-set speech recognition. Two had no detectable auditory percepts.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients who underwent CI following SRS for VS enjoyed access to sound at near-normal levels, with the majority achieving good open-set speech understanding. Implantation can be performed immediately following SRS or in a delayed fashion, depending on hearing status as well as other factors. This strategy may be applied to cases of sporadic or NF2-associated VS.

ABBREVIATIONS

AAO-HNS = American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; ABI = auditory brainstem implant; CI = cochlear implantation; CN = cranial nerve; CNC = consonant-nucleus-consonant; CPA = cerebellopontine angle; EPS = electrical promontory stimulation; ESA = environmental sound awareness; HINT = Hearing in Noise Test; IAC = internal auditory canal; NF2 = neurofibromatosis type 2; OSP = open-set speech perception; PTA = pure tone average; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; VS = vestibular schwannoma; WRS = word recognition score.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Intracochlear Test Electrode for Acoustic Nerve Monitoring in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery

OBJECTIVES

Cochlear implants (CIs) are a well-known hearing restoration option for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) in cases of neurofibromatosis type-2 and, more recently, for patients with sporadic VS. One of the main limitations when performing CI during VS surgery is the capability to preserve the acoustic nerve (AN) anatomically and functionally. Significant efforts have been directed toward developing an intraoperative testing method for monitoring the AN function to determine if, after tumor removal, it is suitable for conducting stimuli delivered by a CI. However, all these methods have significant limitations, and none of them have documented diagnostic efficacy. To overcome these limitations and to obtain reliable information before CI insertion, a minimally invasive intracochlear test electrode (TE) has been recently developed. This TE has demonstrated to be suitable to test the integrity of the AN before CI in patients without any residual hearing by recording electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR). The present study constitutes the next phase of this research, which was to determine the usefulness of EABR obtained intraoperatively with the intracochlear TE after the resection of a VS and to calculate its diagnostic accuracy to assess the functionality of the AN for CI.

DESIGN

This was a prospective, multicenter study of diagnostic accuracy. It was conducted in three tertiary referral centers between January 2015 and 2018. This study was designed following the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) statement guidelines. The STARD statement are guidelines to improve the completeness and transparency of reports of diagnostic accuracy studies. The diagnostic accuracy of the EABR evoked with the intracochlear TE after tumor removal was studied. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. Patients eligible for the study were consecutive adults undergoing surgery for VS with simultaneous CI. The test under evaluation (index test) was the EABR obtained with the intracochlear TE after resection of the tumor. The reference test (gold standard) was the presence of auditory perception with the CI, defined as the presence of sound detection on an audiogram at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz of no greater than 50 dB. In all the cases, auditory perception was verified by the presence of a positive EABR evoked with the CI.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included during the study period; seven patients were excluded from the diagnostic efficacy analysis due to inconclusive EABR results or absence of the gold standard to compare (they did not finally receive the CI). Thus, the outcome of the gold standard was assessed in 14 cases: 9 cases had positive EABR, all of them obtained auditory perception with the CI, and 5 cases had negative EABR, only one case had auditory perception with the CI, which constitutes the only false negative of this study. Accuracy of the TE was 93% (95% confidence interval, 66 to 100%), sensitivity 90% (95% confidence interval, 71 to 100%), specificity 100% (95% confidence interval, 100 to 100%), positive predictive value 100% (95% confidence interval, 100 to 100%), and negative predictive value 80% (95% confidence interval, 45 to 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

EABR elicited with the intracochlear TE had a diagnostic accuracy of 93% for predicting auditory perception with CIs after VS removal. These results suggest that the intracochlear TE can be used intraoperatively after tumor removal to test the integrity of the AN as a useful tool to complement the surgeon's perception for decision-making regarding implantation.

Ipsilateral Cochlear Implantation in the Presence of Observed and Irradiated Vestibular Schwannomas

OBJECTIVES

Historically, eventual loss of cochlear nerve function has limited patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) to auditory brainstem implants (ABI), which in general are less effective than modern cochlear implants (CI). Our objective is to evaluate hearing outcomes following ipsilateral cochlear implantation in patients with NF2 and irradiated vestibular schwannomas (VS), and sporadic VS that have been irradiated or observed.

METHODS

Multi-center retrospective analysis of ipsilateral cochlear implantation in the presence of observed and irradiated VS. MESH search in NCBI PubMed database between 1992 and 2019 for reported cases of cochlear implantation with unresected vestibular schwannoma.

RESULTS

Seven patients underwent ipsilateral cochlear implantation in the presence of observed or irradiated vestibular schwannomas. Four patients had sporadic tumors with severe-profound contralateral hearing loss caused by presbycusis/hereditary sensorineural hearing loss, and three patients with NF2 lost contralateral hearing after prior surgical resection. Prior to implantation, one VS was observed without growth for a period of 7 years and the others were treated with radiotherapy. Mean post-operative sentence score was 63.9% (range 48-91) at an average of 28 (range 2-84) months follow up. All patients in this cohort obtained open set speech perception. While analysis of the literature is limited by heterogenous data reporting, 85% of implants with observed schwannomas achieved some open set perception, and 67% of patients previously radiated schwannomas. Furthermore, blending literature outcomes for post implantation sentence testing in quiet without lip-reading show 59.0 ± 35% for patients with CI and observed tumors and 55.7 ± 35% for patients with radiated tumors, with both groups ranging 0 to 100%.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective series and literature review highlight that hearing outcomes with CI for VS patients are superior to those achieved with ABI. However, important considerations including imaging, delayed hearing loss, and observation time cannot be ignored in this population.

Simultaneous cochlear implantation and removal of acoustic neuroma: implications for hearing

OBJECTIVE

To present our data evaluating the feasibility of simultaneous cochlear implantation with resection of acoustic neuroma.

METHODS

This paper describes a case series of eight adult patients with a radiologically suspected acoustic neuroma, treated at a tertiary referral centre in Newcastle, Australia, between 2012 and 2015. Patients underwent cochlear implantation concurrently with removal of an acoustic neuroma. The approach was translabyrinthine, with facial nerve monitoring and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response testing. Standard post-implant rehabilitation was employed, with three and six months' follow-up data collected. The main outcome measures were: hearing, subjective benefit of implant, operative complications and tumour recurrence.

RESULTS

Eight patients underwent simultaneous cochlear implantation with resection of acoustic neuroma over a 3-year period, and had 25-63 months' follow up. There were no major complications. All patients except one gained usable hearing and were daily implant users.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous cochlear implantation with resection of acoustic neuroma has been shown to be a safe treatment option, which will be applicable in a wide range of clinical scenarios as the indications for cochlear implantation continue to expand.

The emerging role of hearing loss rehabilitation in patients with vestibular schwannoma treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: literature review

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is currently the most common treatment for small- to medium-size vestibular schwannoma (VS). Despite favorable outcome, hearing deterioration still remains an underestimated problem, and the role of hearing rehabilitation is an underinvestigated topic. Among available technologies, cochlear implant (CI) should represent a valid alternative in sporadic VS with single-sided deafness and in neurofibromatosis (NF2) with bilateral profound hearing loss. A literature review of the current clinical data was performed searching scientific literature databases. From all of the articles found, 16 papers were selected. Forty-four subjects treated with radiosurgery (18 male, 19 female, and in 7 cases, sex were not specified; 43 NF2 and 1 sporadic VS) were included in the analysis. Epidemiological, clinical, tumor, treatment, and audiological data were collected. Clinical outcome at last follow-up showed an audiological improvement in 25 of the 44 patients. The audiological outcome was unchanged in 16 cases. Audiological deterioration was recorded in 3 cases. Severity of NF2 phenotype, long history of ipsilateral profound deafness before implantation, progressive tumor growth, and high radiation dose (20 and 40 Gy) were found in patients with a worst audiological outcome. Hearing rehabilitation can improve audiological results for VS patients following SRS in selected cases. Hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implant (CI) in SSD leads to partial restoration of binaural hearing with an improvement in speech comprehension in noise and in sound localization, and partial suppression of subjective incapacitating tinnitus. SRS followed by CI may represent in selected cases a potential emerging option in the management of these patients, aimed at improving their quality of life. Possible implications for the follow-up of these patients are still present, although partially resolved.

Management of sporadic vestibular schwannoma with contralateral nonserviceable hearing

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To outline a possible decision-making process for sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) with contralateral nonserviceable hearing at diagnosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Diagnosed VS was studied in a tertiary referral center from 1995 to 2013.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 6.9 years (range = 0.5-20 years). Ten were stage 1, 10 were stage 2, five were stage 3, and three were stage 4. Ipsilateral hearing levels were A (n = 3), B (n = 10), C (n = 7) and D (n = 8) American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery classification. Contralateral hearing levels were C (n = 11) and D (n = 17). Initial VS management included surveillance (n = 12) or surgery (n = 16), and four patients were later treated with surgery (n = 3) or stereotactic irradiation (n = 1). Hearing was improved by hearing aids and/or etiological treatment (n = 8), restored by contralateral (n = 15) or ipsilateral (n = 4) cochlear implants (CIs), or ipsilateral auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) (n = 3). Finally, 18 CIs were active daily; 14 of them presented high or moderate benefit with mean open-set dissyllabic word scores (WRS) of 58.1% and sentence recognition scores (SRS) of 69.7%, but only one ABI was still active (WRS of 70% and SRS of 87% with lip reading).

CONCLUSIONS

When early removal of VS was not necessary, contralateral CI or etiological treatment for hearing loss might be recommended initially. Ipsilateral CI is proposed, whereas VS should be operated on if previous hearing restoration was not successful. ABI should be reserved for the rare cases where a contralateral CI could not be implanted or the cochlear nerve was sectioned during VS removal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 130:E407-E415, 2020.

Hearing rehabilitation outcomes in cochlear implant recipients with vestibular schwannoma in observation or radiotherapy groups: A systematic review

Objectives: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are rare benign tumours of the vestibular nerve that cause hearing loss. Management strategies include watchful waiting, radiotherapy or surgical resection. Historically, the presence of retrocochlear disease has been considered to be a contra-indication to cochlear implantation (CI). The aim of this systematic review is to assess hearing rehabilitation outcomes for CI recipients with VS, either sporadic or associated with neurofibromatosis type 2, whose tumours have been managed with either observation or radiotherapy.Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception through to November 2018. 50 cases from 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, VS characteristics, management strategy, pre-CI hearing status, electrical promontory stimulation testing, post-CI hearing status and speech perception scores, functional benefits and follow-up length are reported.Results: Radiotherapy and observation groups had similar patient demographics in terms of age at CI, tumour size and duration of deafness. Following CI, 64% and 60% of patients in the radiotherapy and observation groups achieved open-set speech perception, respectively. Pure tone average thresholds (33 vs. 39 dB) and speech scores were also comparable between both groups.Conclusion: Ipsilateral CI in patients with VS that have not been surgically resected can provide beneficial hearing rehabilitation outcomes.

[Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants. German version]

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the internal auditory canal (IAC) and the cochlea is of central importance in neurotology. The artefacts and visibility of the different types of active auditory implants in MRI vary, due to their specific ferromagnetic components. Knowledge of the size of MRI artefacts and the options for handling these is important for the auditory rehabilitation of specific diseases (e. g., vestibular schwannoma).

METHODS

The current paper is a literature review RESULTS: MRI assessment of the IAC and cochlea after surgical placement of an active auditory implant is feasible only with a percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA, Ponto). When specific factors (implant position and MRI sequence) are taken into consideration, these structures can be visualized even after cochlear implantation. Complications such as magnet dislocation and pain may occur.

CONCLUSION

The possibility of assessing the IAC and cochlea by MRI is an important aspect that needs to be taken into consideration when planning the auditory rehabilitation of patients after acoustic neuroma surgery.

Surgery of the lateral skull base: a 50-year endeavour

Disregarding the widely used division of skull base into anterior and lateral, since the skull base should be conceived as a single anatomic structure, it was to our convenience to group all those approaches that run from the antero-lateral, pure lateral and postero-lateral side of the skull base as “Surgery of the lateral skull base”. “50 years of endeavour” points to the great effort which has been made over the last decades, when more and more difficult surgeries were performed by reducing morbidity. The principle of lateral skull base surgery, “remove skull base bone to approach the base itself and the adjacent sites of the endo-esocranium”, was then combined with function preservation and with tailoring surgery to the pathology. The concept that histology dictates the extent of resection, balancing the intrinsic morbidity of each approach was the object of the first section of the present report. The main surgical approaches were described in the second section and were conceived not as a step-by-step description of technique, but as the highlighthening of the surgical principles. The third section was centered on open issues related to the tumor and its treatment. The topic of vestibular schwannoma was investigated with the current debate on observation, hearing preservation surgery, hearing rehabilitation, radiotherapy and the recent efforts to detect biological markers able to predict tumor growth. Jugular foramen paragangliomas were treated in the frame of radical or partial surgery, radiotherapy, partial “tailored” surgery and observation. Surgery on meningioma was debated from the point of view of the neurosurgeon and of the otologist. Endolymphatic sac tumors and malignant tumors of the external auditory canal were also treated, as well as chordomas, chondrosarcomas and petrous bone cholesteatomas. Finally, the fourth section focused on free-choice topics which were assigned to aknowledged experts. The aim of this work was attempting to report the state of the art of the lateral skull base surgery after 50 years of hard work and, above all, to raise questions on those issues which still need an answer, as to allow progress in knowledge through sharing of various experiences. At the end of the reading, if more doubts remain rather than certainties, the aim of this work will probably be achieved.

Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the internal auditory canal (IAC) and cochlea is of central importance in neurotology. The artefacts and visibility of active auditory implants on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vary because of their specific magnetic components. Knowledge of the size of MRI artefacts and the options for handling them is important for the auditory rehabilitation of specific diseases (e. g., vestibular schwannoma).

METHODS

The current article is a literature review.

RESULTS

MRI assessment of the IAC and cochlea after surgical placement of an active auditory implant is feasible only with a percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA, Ponto). When specific factors (implant position and MRI sequence) are taken into consideration, these structures can be visualized even after cochlear implantation. Complications such as magnet dislocation and pain may occur.

CONCLUSION

The possibility of assessing the IAC and cochlea by MRI is an important aspect that needs to be taken into consideration when planning the auditory rehabilitation of patients after acoustic neuroma surgery.

Impact of cochlear implantation on the management strategy of patients with neurofibromatosis type 2

PURPOSE

To investigate the outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and to discuss the current management strategy for NF2 patients.

METHODS

The medical records of NF2 patients who received cochlear implants (CI) at our center between 2012 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Pre-operative hearing status, tumor status, treatment of tumors, and auditory outcomes post-implantation were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included in the study. Five were implanted with the tumor in situ; two of them received radiotherapy pre-implantation, and three were implanted without any previous treatment. Four patients were implanted simultaneously with tumor removal. Three patients were implanted as second-stage after failed hearing preservation surgery. The mean pure tone audiometry with the implant was 44 dB (range 25-80 dB) and the mean sentence recognition score (SRS) in a quiet environment without lip reading was 63% (range 0-97%). A poorer objective auditory outcome was identified in one patient who showed no response to electrical promontory stimulation (EPS), but the sound perception was still helpful. In total, 11 of 12 (91%) patients were daily users, and the other patient used the implant as a "sleeper" device due to its interference with contralateral hearing provided by a hearing aid.

CONCLUSION

CI is an effective option in auditory rehabilitation and should be considered primarily for NF2 patients with intact cochlear nerve. EPS might be a predictor for cochlear implant performance. Good contralateral hearing may present a barrier to daily use.

Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Receiver Position and Its Temporal Changes

HYPOTHESIS

It was the aim of this study to establish normative data regarding intended changes in cochlear implants (CI) receiver positioning by one surgeon over time.

BACKGROUND

With the increasing number of CI patients, the probability of needing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) increases. The accessibility of cerebral structures is limited by MRI artifacts caused by CI. New studies show a dependence of the visibility of intracranial structures by the MRI sequences and the position of the CI receiver itself.

METHODS

Retrospective and interindividual investigation of topograms with regard to the nasion-external auditory canal-internal magnet angle and the distance between the internal magnet and the external auditory canal. We evaluated scans of 150 CI recipients implanted from 2008 until 2015.

RESULTS

The most common implant position in the years 2008 to 2015 was a nasion-external auditory canal-internal magnet angle between 121 and 140 degrees (mean, 127 degrees) and an internal magnet-external auditory canal distance between 61 and 80 mm (mean, 70 mm). Over time the nasion-external auditory canal-internal magnet angle increased and the internal magnet-external auditory canal distance decreased, both to a statistically significant degree. A difference between the manufacturers was not observed.

CONCLUSION

The CI receiver position is important for an artifact-free examination of the internal auditory canal and the cochlea. The realization of the position over a time course supports awareness of artifact-related visibility limitations.

Outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2

In neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VS) or their treatment usually results in bilateral hearing loss. Cochlear implantation (CI) was traditionally not used in these patients due to concern that retrocochlear disease would render the implant ineffective. This paper describes the auditory outcomes of CI in 13 patients with NF2 and includes patients with untreated VS and patients undergoing VS removal with cochlear nerve preservation. The non-user rate was 7.7%. Of the active users, median CUNY score was 98%, median BKB score in quiet was 90% and median BKB score in noise was 68%. CI is a viable option in selected patients with NF2.

Cochlear implantation in delayed sudden hearing loss after conservative vestibular schwannoma surgery

This is a case of successful cochlear implantation in a 50-year-old man who experienced sudden hearing loss and developed ipsilateral severe tinnitus at three years following conservative stage 1 vestibular schwannoma retrosigmoid surgery. After cochlear implantation, tinnitus improved from THI grade 4 to 2. Localisation skills improved. Hearing in noise (S/N + 7 dB) with target signal from the operated side improved from 38 to 100% of correct answers. A significant improvement of spatial and speech items of the "speech, spatial and qualities of sounds" questionnaire was also measured. In conclusion, cochlear implantation is a feasible and effective solution after conservative vestibular schwannoma surgery should delayed hearing loss occur.

Hearing optimisation in neurofibromatosis type 2: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

It is common for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 to develop bilateral profound hearing loss hearing loss, and this is one of the main determinants of quality of life in this patient group.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to review the current literature regarding hearing outcomes of treatments for vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2 including conservative and medical management, radiotherapy, hearing preservation surgery and auditory implantation in order to determine the most effective way of preserving or rehabilitating hearing.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A MESH search in PubMed using search terms (('Neurofibromatosis 2' [Mesh]) AND 'Neuroma, Acoustic'[Mesh]) AND 'Hearing Loss' [Mesh] was performed. A search using keywords was also performed. Studies with adequate hearing outcome data were included. With the exception of the cochlear implant studies (cohort size was very small), case studies were excluded.

EVALUATION METHOD

The GRADE system was used to assess quality of publication. Formal statistical analysis of data was not performed because of very heterogenous data reporting.

RESULTS

Conservative management offers the best chance of hearing preservation in stable tumours. The use of bevacizumab probably improves the likelihood of hearing preservation in growing tumours in the short term and is probably more effective than hearing preservation surgery and radiotherapy in preserving hearing. Of the hearing preservation interventions, hearing preservation surgery probably offers better hearing preservation rates than radiotherapy for small tumours but recurrence rates for hearing preservation surgery were high. For patients with profound hearing loss, cochlear implantation provides significantly better auditory outcomes than auditory brainstem implantation. Patients with untreated stable tumours are likely to achieve the best outcomes from cochlear implantation. Those who have had their tumours treated with surgery or radiotherapy do not gain as much benefit from cochlear implantation than those with untreated tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

This review summarises the current literature related to hearing preservation/rehabilitation in patients with NF2. Whilst it provides indicative data, the quality of the data was low and should be interpreted with care. It is also important to consider that the management of vestibular schwannomas in NF2 is complex and decision-making is determined by many factors, not just the need to preserve hearing.

Pathophysiological mechanisms and functional hearing consequences of auditory neuropathy

The effects of inner ear abnormality on audibility have been explored since the early 20th century when sound detection measures were first used to define and quantify 'hearing loss'. The development in the 1970s of objective measures of cochlear hair cell function (cochlear microphonics, otoacoustic emissions, summating potentials) and auditory nerve/brainstem activity (auditory brainstem responses) have made it possible to distinguish both synaptic and auditory nerve disorders from sensory receptor loss. This distinction is critically important when considering aetiology and management. In this review we address the clinical and pathophysiological features of auditory neuropathy that distinguish site(s) of dysfunction. We describe the diagnostic criteria for: (i) presynaptic disorders affecting inner hair cells and ribbon synapses; (ii) postsynaptic disorders affecting unmyelinated auditory nerve dendrites; (iii) postsynaptic disorders affecting auditory ganglion cells and their myelinated axons and dendrites; and (iv) central neural pathway disorders affecting the auditory brainstem. We review data and principles to identify treatment options for affected patients and explore their benefits as a function of site of lesion.

Ipsilateral cochlear implantation in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma in the only or best hearing ear and in patients with NF2

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cochlear implant (CI) performances in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients with bilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS) and in patients with sporadic VS in the only or better hearing ear. All patients with bilateral VS or sporadic VS in the only or better hearing ear who underwent cochlear implantation, either simultaneous to VS surgery or staged after treatment for VS, in the tumor side were chosen for the study. Postimplantation audiometric scores (sound detection, closed-set and open-set discrimination scores) and device use patterns were the main outcome measures. 15 patients were implanted. Eight patients (53 %) were NF2 and seven patients had VS in the only or better hearing ear. One patient was explanted for cerebrospinal fluid leak. In the CI-only condition, the other 14 patients obtained sound detection, 64 % of them achieving open-set discrimination (mean 70 ± 38 %) and 85 % achieving closed-set discrimination (mean 41 ± 33 %). At the last follow-up 10 patients (67 %) were using the CI. Cochlear implantation provides hearing in particular cases of patients with bilateral VS or VS in the only or better hearing ear. As long as anatomic preservation of the cochlear nerve is achieved, cochlear implantation may offer improvement in communication skills for most patients.