Mechanical Blood-Immersed Bearings in Continuous-Flow Rotary Blood Pumps

A comprehensive comparison of the in vitro hemocompatibility of extracorporeal centrifugal blood pumps

Purpose: Blood damage has been associated with patients under temporary continuous-flow mechanical circulatory support. To evaluate the side effects caused by transit blood pumping, in vitro hemocompatibility testing for blood damage in pumps is considered a necessary reference before clinical trials. Methods: The hemocompatibility of five extracorporeal centrifugal blood pumps was investigated comprehensively, including four commercial pumps (the Abbott CentriMag, the Terumo Capiox, the Medos DP3, and the Medtronic BPX-80) and a pump in development (the magAssist MoyoAssist^®). In vitro, hemolysis was tested with heparinized porcine blood at nominal operating conditions (5 L/min, 160 mmHg) and extreme operating conditions (1 L/min, 290 mmHg) using a circulation flow loop. Hematology analyses concerning the blood cell counts and the degradation of high-molecular-weight von Willebrand factor (VWF) during 6-h circulation were also evaluated. Results: Comparing the in vitro hemocompatibility of blood pumps at different operations, the blood damage was significantly more severe at extreme operating conditions than that at nominal operating conditions. The performance of the five blood pumps was arranged in different orders at these two operating conditions. The results also demonstrated superior hemocompatibility of CentriMag and MoyoAssist^® at two operating conditions, with overall low blood damage at hemolysis level, blood cell counts, and degradation of high-molecular-weight VWF. It suggested that magnetic bearings have an advantage in hemocompatibility compared to the mechanical bearing of blood pumps. Conclusion: Involving multiple operating conditions of blood pumps in in vitro hemocompatibility evaluation will be helpful for clinical application. In addition, the magnetically levitated centrifugal blood pump MoyoAssist^® shows great potential in the future as it demonstrated good in vitro hemocompatibility.

Total Artificial Heart Computational Fluid Dynamics: Modeling of Stator Bore Design Effects on Journal-Bearing Performance

Cleveland Clinic's continuous-flow total artificial heart (CFTAH) is a double-ended centrifugal blood pump that has a single rotating assembly with an embedded magnet, which is axially and radially suspended by a balance of magnetic and hydrodynamic forces. The key to the radial suspension is a radial offset between the stator bearing bore and the magnet's steel laminations. This offset applies a radial magnetic force, which is balanced by a hydrodynamic force as the rotating assembly moves to a "force-balanced" radial position. The journal-bearing blood passage is a narrow flow path between the left and right impellers. The intent of this study was to determine the impact of the stator-bearing bore radius on the journal-bearing hydraulic performance while satisfying the geometric design constraints imposed by the pump and motor configuration. Electromagnetic forces on the journal bearing were calculated using the ANSYS EMAG program, Version 18 (ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA). ANSYS CFX Version 19.2 was then used to model the journal-bearing flow paths of the most recent design of the CFTAH. A transient, moving mesh approach was used to locate the steady state, force-balanced position of the rotating assembly. The blood was modeled as a non-Newtonian fluid. The computational fluid dynamics simulations showed that by increasing stator bore radius, rotor power, stator wall average shear stress, and blood residence time in journal-bearing decrease, while blood net flow rate through the bearing increases. The results were used to select a new bearing design that provides an improved performance compared with the baseline design. The performance of the new CFTAH-bearing design will be confirmed through upcoming in vitro and in vivo testing.

Physiology of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy

The expanding use of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) for end-stage heart failure warrants familiarity with the physiologic interaction of the device with the native circulation. Contemporary devices utilize predominantly centrifugal flow and, to a lesser extent, axial flow rotors that vary with respect to their intrinsic flow characteristics. Flow can be manipulated with adjustments to preload and afterload as in the native heart, and ascertainment of the predicted effects is provided by differential pressure-flow (H-Q) curves or loops. Valvular heart disease, especially aortic regurgitation, may significantly affect adequacy of mechanical support. In contrast, atrioventricular and ventriculoventricular timing is of less certain significance. Although beneficial effects of device therapy are typically seen due to enhanced distal perfusion, unloading of the left ventricle and atrium, and amelioration of secondary pulmonary hypertension, negative effects of CF-LVAD therapy on right ventricular filling and function, through right-sided loading and septal interaction, can make optimization challenging. Additionally, a lack of pulsatile energy provided by CF-LVAD therapy has physiologic consequences for end-organ function and may be responsible for a series of adverse effects. Rheological effects of intravascular pumps, especially shear stress exposure, result in platelet activation and hemolysis, which may result in both thrombotic and hemorrhagic consequences. Development of novel solutions for untoward device-circulatory interactions will facilitate hemodynamic support while mitigating adverse events. © 2021 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 12:1-37, 2021.

Comparative assessment of different versions of axial and centrifugal LVADs: A review

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have gained tremendous acceptance for the treatment of end-stage heart failure patients. Among different versions, axial flow and centrifugal flow LVADs have shown remarkable potential for clinical implants. It is also very crucial to know which device serves its purpose better to treat heart failure patients. A thorough comparison of axial and centrifugal LVADs, which may guide doctors in deciding before the implant, still lacks in the literature. In this work, an assessment of axial and centrifugal LVADs has been made to suggest a better device by comparing their engineering, clinical, and technological development of design aspects. Hydrodynamic and hemodynamic aspects for both types of pumps are discussed along with their biocompatibility, bearing types, and sizes. It has been observed numerically that centrifugal LVADs perform better over axial LVADs in every engineering aspect like higher hydraulic efficiency, better characteristics curve, lesser power intake, and also lesser blood damage. However, the clinical outcomes suggest that centrifugal LVADs experience higher events of infections, renal, and respiratory dysfunction. In contrast, axial LVADs encountered higher bleeding and cardiac arrhythmia. Moreover, recent technological developments suggested that magnetic type bearings along with biocompatible coating improve the life of LVADs.