Distribution of Esophageal Motor Disorders in Diabetic Patients With Dysphagia

Ineffective esophageal motility is associated with diabetes mellitus end organ complications

BACKGROUND

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is known to induce a wide range of harmful effects on several organs, notably leading to ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). However, the relationship between DM and IEM is not fully elucidated. We aimed to determine the relationship between DM and IEM and to evaluate the impact of DM's end organ complications on IEM severity.

METHODS

A multicenter cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) was performed. We reviewed medical records of patients diagnosed with IEM using HREM, encompassing data on demographics, DM history, antidiabetic and other medications as well as comorbidities.

KEY RESULTS

Two hundred and forty six subjects met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in any of the HREM parameters between diabetics and nondiabetics. Out of 246 patients, 92 were diabetics. Diabetics with neuropathy presented a significantly lower distal contractile integral (DCI) value compared to those without neuropathy (248.2 ± 226.7 mmHg·cm·sec vs. 375.6 ± 232.4 mmHg·cm·sec; p = 0.02) Similarly, the DCI was lower in diabetics with retinopathy compared to those without retinopathy (199.9 ± 123.1 mmHg·cm·sec vs. 335.4 ± 251.7 mmHg·cm·sec; p = 0.041). Additionally, a significant difference was observed in DCI values among DM patients with ≥2 comorbidities compared to those without comorbidities (224.8 ± 161.0 mmHg·cm·sec vs. 394.2 ± 243.6 mmHg·cm·sec; p = 0.025). Around 12.6% of the variation in DCI could be explained by its linear relationship with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), with a regression coefficient (β) of -55.3.

CONCLUSION & INFERENCES

DM is significantly associated with IEM in patients with neuropathy, retinopathy, or multiple comorbidities. These results are pivotal for tailoring patient-specific management approaches.

Swallowing dysfunction between the community-living older adults with and without comorbid conditions using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM)

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to investigate older adults' perspective on their swallowing physiology using a PROM tool. The study further explored the swallowing issues among older adults with and without comorbid conditions.

METHOD

One hundred twenty-two (122) participants participated in the e-survey. A questionnaire was developed to assess the swallowing deficits among older adults, and Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) was administered to assess the PROM.

RESULTS

The results revealed that 40% of older adults with comorbid conditions had EAT-10 scores greater than 3, suggesting swallowing deficits. A significant difference was observed between the two groups with respect to swallowing deficits, as reported on EAT-10.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results, it can be delineated that swallowing deficits emerge with aging. More of older adults with comorbid conditions reported swallowing deficits in comparison to those without comorbid conditions. Hence, their nutritional and health status gets compromised, leading to poor quality of life.

Implementation of Esophageal Screening in an Outpatient Hospital-Based Setting: A Quality Improvement Project

PURPOSE

Despite evidence supporting interconnectivity of oropharyngeal and esophageal swallowing, evaluation and treatment are dichotomized. When the videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) only considers oropharyngeal swallowing, the full scope of swallowing impairment may be missed. A lower rate of esophageal screening in an outpatient hospital setting may result from lack of speech-language pathologist (SLP) training and understanding of screening feasibility. This project was an internal quality improvement project (QIP) at Mayo Clinic in Arizona to (a) educate and train SLPs on conducting the Robust Esophageal Screening Test (REST) and (b) determine the feasibility of REST protocol implementation in a multidisciplinary swallow clinic.

METHOD

Fishbone analysis was used to identify potential causes of the gap in quality. Six Sigma methodology was used to outline the QIP. SLPs were trained in the REST protocol. To ensure adequate training, reliability ratings were assessed with the Cohen's kappa statistic. Esophageal screening via REST was implemented as an adjunct to the standard protocol during VFSS over a 3-month period for referred patients with dysphagia. Clinical findings were recorded.

RESULTS

All clinical rater SLPs reached the threshold of κ = .8 to ensure adequate rater reliability. Among 136 outpatients who underwent esophageal screening via REST, 100 patients completed the full REST screening and 36 completed a partial REST screening. Of the 100 full screenings, 80 patients had a failed screening, which indicated a potential esophageal swallowing impairment. Findings were discussed by members of the multidisciplinary dysphagia care team.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this QIP show that focusing on assessment of dysfunction and interplay across the swallowing continuum can substantially improve patient care by expediting and specifying next steps of the multidisciplinary dysphagia care team.

Green polymer altered in-situ gel oral liquid sustainable release preparation of vildagliptin suitable for dysphagic diabetic patients: assessment in-vitro & in-vivo

PURPOSE

This work aimed to fabricate alginate based in-situ gelling matrix of vildagliptin improved by calcium and carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC) for appropriate adjustment of the onset and duration of action. This easy-to-swallow thickened liquid preparation aimed to improve compliance for dysphagic or elderly diabetic patients.

METHODS

Vildagliptin dispersions containing alginate were fabricated in the presence or absence of calcium chloride to assess the effect of calcium ion, then a matrix containing 1.5% w/v of sodium alginate with calcium was further examined after the addition of CMC with different concentrations ranging from 0.1% to 0.3%. The viscosity, gelling forming property, Differential scanning calorimetry, and in-vitro drug release were assessed before monitoring the hypoglycemic effect of the selected formulation.

RESULTS

In-situ gel matrixes were fabricated at gastric pH with and without calcium ions. The best formula concerning viscosity and the gel-forming property was achieved with higher CMC concentrations, which in turn decreased the rate of vildagliptin release in stimulated gastric pH. In-vivo results confirmed the extended hypoglycemic effect of the vildagliptin in-situ gelling matrix compared to the vildagliptin aqueous solution.

CONCLUSION

This study represents a green polymeric-based in-situ gel as a liquid oral retarded release preparation intended for reducing dose frequency, easier administration of vildagliptin, and improving compliance in geriatric and dysphagic diabetic patients.

Clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, and lower esophageal sphincter characteristics in patients with absent contractility

Absent contractility is a rare esophageal motility disorder defined by high-resolution manometry which remains poorly understood in pathogenesis and management. We investigated the clinical symptoms, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings, and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) characteristics in adult patients diagnosed with absent contractility on high resolution manometry and factors associated with erosive esophagitis that were found on endoscopy in these patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with absent contractility who were examined at the Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vietnam between March 2018 and December 2020. Clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, and LES metrics were collected and compared between individuals with and without erosive esophagitis. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine a variety of factors associated with erosive esophagitis. Among 7519 patients who underwent high resolution manometry, 204 (2.7%) were diagnosed with absent contractility. The mean age of the study sample was 45.9 years, 65.7% were women, and none had systemic sclerosis. The most common symptoms were regurgitation, belching, epigastric pain, and bloating. On endoscopy, 50% had erosive esophagitis, mostly Los Angeles grade A (42.9%). On manometry, 44.6% of the patients had LES hypotension and 68.1% had low integrated relaxation pressure in 4 seconds (IRP4s). Male sex (adjusted odds ratio = 2.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-3.89) and an IRP4s < 5 mm Hg (adjusted odds ratio = 2.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.12-4.37) were significantly associated with erosive esophagitis. Absent contractility was present in many patients without known systemic diseases. Erosive esophagitis was common and associated with male sex and low IRP4s.

[Diabetic gastroenteropathy: modern methods of diagnosis and treatment]

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease with a growing prevalence worldwide, however, the prevalence of its complications, including gastroenteropathy, is also increasing. The pathophysiology of diabetic gastroenteropathy (DH) combines hyperglycemia, vagus nerve dysfunction, decreased expression of nitric oxide synthase in the myenteric plexus, changes in the interstitial Cajal cell network, as well as oxidative stress. Clinical signs of DH are gastroesophageal reflux, gastroparesis, constipation, abdominal pain and diarrhea. Among the diagnostic methods are manometry with pH measurement (assessment of esophageal motility), gastric emptying scintigraphy, respiratory test (to assess gastroparesis), aspiration and cultivation of the contents of the jejunum (to diagnose bacterial overgrowth syndrome). To date, there is no definitive treatment for DH - an interdisciplinary approach is aimed at slowing the progression of the disease, relieving symptoms and restoring gastrointestinal function. Patients are recommended a diet low in simple sugars and high in fiber; optimization of glycemic control with a target glycemia of less than 180 mg/dl. As for drug therapy, the use of prokinetics and antiemetics is justified, and in case of excessive bacterial growth syndrome, antibacterial therapy (rifaximin) is carried out. Modern approaches to the treatment of DH are also accumulating, including the use of botulinum toxin, pyloroplasty and electrical stimulation of the stomach in individual patients. Despite the constant development of new treatments, they are not yet able to completely cure DH in the near future, which makes it necessary to conduct further research in this area.

A Comparative Assessment of the Diagnosis of Swallowing Impairment and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Canines and Humans

Swallowing impairment is a highly prevalent and clinically significant problem affecting people and dogs. There are myriad causes of swallowing impairment of which gastroesophageal reflux is the most common in both species. Similarities in anatomy and physiology between humans and canines results in analogous swallowing disorders including cricopharyngeus muscle achalasia, esophageal achalasia, hiatal herniation, and gastroesophageal reflux with secondary esophagitis and esophageal dysmotility. Accordingly, the diagnostic approach to human and canine patients with swallowing impairment is similar. Diagnostic procedures such as swallowing fluoroscopy, high-resolution manometry, pH/impedance monitoring, and endolumenal functional luminal imaging probe can be performed in both species; however, nasofacial conformation, increased esophageal length, and the difficulty of completing several of these procedures in awake dogs are inherent challenges that need to be considered. Human patients can convey their symptoms and respond to verbal cues, whereas veterinarians must rely on clinical histories narrated by pet owners followed by comprehensive physical examination and observation of the animal eating different food consistencies and drinking water. Dogs may also be unwilling to drink or eat in the hospital setting and may be resistant to physical restraint during diagnostic procedures. Despite the species differences and diagnostic challenges, dogs are a natural animal model for many oropharyngeal and esophageal disorders affecting people, which presents a tremendous opportunity for shared learnings. This manuscript reviews the comparative aspects of esophageal anatomy and physiology between humans and canines, summarizes the diagnostic assessment of swallowing impairment in both species, and discusses future considerations for collaborative medicine and translational research.

Association of Incidence of Acid-related Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders With Glycated Hemoglobin Level

CONTEXT

Previous cross-sectional studies show diabetes and higher levels of plasma hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) are associated with a higher prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) complications. However, whether the glycemic status is associated with incident acid-related upper GI disorders remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the effect of hyperglycemia per se, in terms of HbA1c, on the incidence of acid-related disorders.

METHODS

We analyzed consecutive subjects who had undergone repeated upper endoscopies as part of the health examinations at the National Taiwan University Hospital from 2005 to 2011. Acid-related endoscopic abnormalities were defined as erosive esophagitis (EE), Barrett's esophagus (BE), and peptic ulcer disease (PUD), which included gastric ulcers (GUs) and duodenal ulcers (DUs). All subjects were categorized by 3 tertiles of HbA1c levels. We analyzed the occurrence of respective acid-related disorders during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 11 391 participants (mean HbA1c level 5.6 ± 0.7%) were enrolled in this longitudinal study. During the 38 426.3 person-years of follow-up (mean duration 3.37 ± 1.59 years), the incidence of EE, BE, GU, DU, PUD, and any acid-related disorders were 22.1%, 0.5%, 4.5%, 8.6%, 12.3%, and 30.3%, respectively. The higher HbA1c level was associated with higher risk of disease incidents, except BE, during the follow-up (all log-rank P < .001). In the Cox regression analyses with confounding factors fully adjusted, the hazard ratios for EE, GU, DU, PUD, and acid-related disorders were 1.174, 1.339, 1.24, 1.24, and 1.186, respectively, for the third tertile of HbA1c (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Higher HbA1c level was associated with a higher risk of acid-related upper GI endoscopic abnormalities. Efforts toward better glycemic control may help to prevent the development of late GI complications.

Prevalence of Different Types of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders and Their Associated Factors in Patients Referring to Shariati Hospital during 2018-2019

BACKGROUND: Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) are common in patients with dysphagia and are effectively diagnosed with high-resolution manometry (HREM). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of different types of primary EMDs in patients referred for HREM and to further investigate the factors associated with EMDs. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, all patients referred to the endoscopy section of Shariati Hospital during 2018-2019 (279 patients) were subjected to HREM and were evaluated according to their diagnosis, and the effect of each factor and each symptom on motility disorders was investigated. RESULTS: 84.5% (235) of the participants were diagnosed with at least one esophageal motility disorder; of them, achalasia was the most common form (52.6%). None of the predictive factors showed a statistically significant correlation with EMDs. However, regarding the symptoms, regurgitation and nocturnal cough were significantly more common in patients with EMD (P=0.001 and 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the high prevalence of EMDs in patients undergoing manometry. None of the factors studied, such as age, sex, diabetes, hypothyroidism, smoking, and alcohol and opium consumption, had a statistically significant correlation with EMDs.

Comparison of High-Resolution Manometry in Patients Complaining of Dysphagia among Patients with or without Diabetes Mellitus

INTRODUCTION

Dysphagia is a common symptom that occurs in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). There have been few prospective observational studies on esophageal motility disorders in DM using high-resolution manometry (HRM). This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of esophageal motility disorders using HRM in patients with dysphagia and compare them between DM and non-DM patients.

METHODS

Patients with dysphagia were prospectively recruited between October 2018 and July 2019. Patients (n = 89) underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and HRM and completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire. Manometry parameters and motility disorder classifications were compared between DM and non-DM patients. We also investigated the differences in clinical backgrounds and questionnaire scores among DM patients with normal and abnormal manometry results.

RESULTS

A higher prevalence of esophageal motility disorder was observed in DM patients (60%, 21/35) compared to non-DM patients (29.6%, 16/54) (p = 0.001). The prevalence of minor disorders such as ineffective esophageal motor disorder and fragmented peristalsis was significantly higher (45 vs. 11%), and the distal contractile integral, integrated relaxation pressure, and contractile front velocity values were lower in the DM group. Among DM patients, those with abnormal esophageal motility had a significantly higher prevalence of neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy, as well as higher reflux or constipation scores on the GSRS, than those with normal results.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with dysphagia, the frequency of minor esophageal motility disorders was higher in DM patients than in non-DM patients. Abnormal esophageal motility related to poor esophageal clearance was associated with higher prevalence of diabetic complications.

The mechanism of esophagus dysmotility in diabetes and research progress of relating treatments

Introduction: Esophagus dysmotility is a crucial risk factor of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which is one of the most common diseases in digestive medicine globally. This review emphasizes the mechanisms of esophagus dysmotility in diabetes and summarizes more targeted treatments for these patients to avoid the overuse of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).Areas covered: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a clear factor that must not be neglected in the development of GERD. Previous studies have preliminarily researched the esophagus deterioration in diabetes. However, the multi-faceted mechanisms of esophagus dysmotility in diabetes need more studies. Besides, targeted treatments for these patients rather than conventional PPIs are urgently needed.Expert opinion: The treatments for GERD patients with diabetes should be further explored. Pharmacological approaches such as prokinetic agents, psychotherapy can be adopted. Meanwhile, it's feasible to explore non-drug treatments. For example, Electroacupuncture (EA) at Zusanli (ST-36) may be effective to protect the networks of intestinal cells of Cajal (ICCs) in diabetes. More effective approaches should be explored to achieve individualized treatment for these patients.

Esophageal Food Impaction: A Retrospective Chart Review

Background

Esophageal food impaction (EFI) is the third most common non-biliary emergency in gastroenterology, with an annual incidence rate of 13 episodes per 100,000 person-years and 1,500 deaths per year. Patients presenting with food impaction often have underlying esophageal pathology. We evaluated the possible risk factors for EFI in our study.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of 455 patients at Staten Island University Hospital (SIUH) that presented with symptoms of food impaction from 1999 to 2017. We analyzed relevant clinical data such as age, risk factors, type of food bolus, location, administration of glucagon, endoscopic technique and complications.

Results

Overall, 174 patients had endoscopically confirmed EFI. The majority were males 102/174 (58.6%). Esophageal pathological findings included esophagitis in 58/174 (33.3%), strictures in 43/174 (24.7%), hiatal hernias in 29/174 (16.6%) and Schatzki’s rings in 15/174 (8.6%). Thirty-two out of 174 (18.3%) had normal endoscopic findings. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was reported in 20/174 (11.4%) patients. The type of food impacted was mostly meat in 73/174 (41.9%) cases. The location of EFI was mainly in the lower one-third of the esophagus in 94/174 (54%). The endoscopic push technique was used in 95/174 (54.5%) patients and the pull technique in 83/174 (47.7%) cases. The endoscopic therapeutic intervention was successful as a first attempt in 165/175 (94.8%) patients. Complications were reported in only 5/174 (2.8%), and these mostly comprised of perforations and tears. Glucagon was given to 74/174 (42.5%) patients. The median door-to-scope time (time of presentation at the emergency department to endoscopic intervention) was 7 h (range 1.5 - 24 h) in patients who had received glucagon as opposed to 7 h (range 1 - 24 h) in patients who did not receive it.

Conclusion

EFI is more common in males. Esophageal strictures and hiatal hernias were the most common pathologies found in endoscopy. Esophagitis was evident in 33.3% of patients, but if it was the cause or consequence of EFI is not clearly understood. DM was associated with food impaction in only 11.4% of patients, but more studies are needed to determine if DM has a stronger association with EFI. The door-to-scope time was shorter in patients who had received glucagon. Endoscopy is a safe and effective therapeutic intervention for EFI, and complications reported were minimal.

Diabetic gastroenteropathy: An underdiagnosed complication

This article is an extensive review that provides an update on the pathophysiology, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of diabetic gastroenteropathy. There is no reported prevalence, but it has been described that patients with type 1 diabetes have a cumulative incidence at 10 years of 5.2%, and type 2 patients, 1%. Also, in the group of type 1 diabetes, it has been observed that women are more likely to present this condition (5.8% vs 3.5%). Many factors are associate with its development (e.g., hyperglycemia, vagal dysfunction, loss of expression of neural nitric oxide synthase in the myenteric plexus, alterations in the Cajal interstitial cell network, and oxidative stress). Gastrointestinal discomfort could be perceived 70% higher in diabetic patients, describing that 25% of diabetic patients experience gastrointestinal symptoms. Diabetic enteropathy could affect any portion of the gastrointestinal tract, but esophageal alterations were described in more than 60% of diabetic patients, also 60% of them present constipation, and 20%, diarrhea. Gastric emptying scintigraphy is useful to evaluate gastroparesis, therefore, gastric retention of more than 60% at 2 h has a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 20% for diagnosis; however, other studies such as breath tests, with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 80%, or the endoscopic capsule contribute to the diagnosis. There is no cure; however, management must be multidisciplinary, focused on slowing the progression of diabetic gastroenteropathy, reducing symptoms, and restoring function; that includes nutritional recommendation, maintain glucose levels kept below 180 mg/dL, use of prokinetics, anti-emetics; nowadays, it has been special interest in surgical treatment, such as pyloroplasty, also gastric electrical stimulation appears to be another alternative.

Assessment of Gastrointestinal Autonomic Dysfunction: Present and Future Perspectives

The autonomic nervous system delicately regulates the function of several target organs, including the gastrointestinal tract. Thus, nerve lesions or other nerve pathologies may cause autonomic dysfunction (AD). Some of the most common causes of AD are diabetes mellitus and α-synucleinopathies such as Parkinson’s disease. Widespread dysmotility throughout the gastrointestinal tract is a common finding in AD, but no commercially available method exists for direct verification of enteric dysfunction. Thus, assessing segmental enteric physiological function is recommended to aid diagnostics and guide treatment. Several established assessment methods exist, but disadvantages such as lack of standardization, exposure to radiation, advanced data interpretation, or high cost, limit their utility. Emerging methods, including high-resolution colonic manometry, 3D-transit, advanced imaging methods, analysis of gut biopsies, and microbiota, may all assist in the evaluation of gastroenteropathy related to AD. This review provides an overview of established and emerging assessment methods of physiological function within the gut and assessment methods of autonomic neuropathy outside the gut, especially in regards to clinical performance, strengths, and limitations for each method.

Esophageal motility patterns are altered in older adult patients

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Since the 1960s, several studies have shown the effect of aging on esophageal motility, with inconsistent results. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the manometric results in older adult patients (=60 years of age) with an esophageal disorder and compare them with adults under 60 years of age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted that included a sample of 1,175 patients (936 older adults and 239 non-older adults). The patients were evaluated and compared with respect to (i) sex, (ii) main complaint for which esophageal manometry was indicated, (iii) comorbidities, (iv) current medications, (v) smoking, and (vi) manometry results.

RESULTS

Patient age ranged from 19 to 92 years (women made up 76.5% of the older adults and 72.8% of the non-older adults). Normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and normal peristalsis were more frequent in the non-older patient group (91.1% vs. 84.8% and 87.4% vs. 76%, respectively). The manometry results for the non-older adults vs. the older adults, respectively, were: achalasia (2.9% vs. 5.9%); hypercontractile disorder (9.2% vs. 10.4%); hypocontractile disorder (38.5% vs. 47.6%); and normal values (49.4% vs. 36.1%). After excluding the variables that could change esophageal motility, the results revealed significant differences between the two study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal manometry demonstrated statistically significant differences between the older adult and non-older adult study population evaluated.

Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Self-Reported Swallowing Difficulties

INTRODUCTION

People with diabetes frequently have gastrointestinal problems and related deglutition disorders.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of the present study are to determine the symptomatic swallowing complaints and to evaluate the functionality of oropharyngeal swallowing in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by using the Turkish Eating Assessment Tool-10 (T-EAT-10) and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).

METHODS

In this descriptive cross-sectional study, the T-EAT-10 questionnaire was completed by 121 patients with diabetes, and FEES was planned for each individual whose baseline score of the T-EAT-10 was ≥3. Before swallowing trials via samples of nectar-thick consistency, laryngeal sensation and severity of secretion in the hypopharynx were observed. While the swallowing safety was determined using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale was used to assess the swallowing efficiency.

RESULTS

Of the total participants, 22.3% (n = 27) were found to have abnormal swallowing function (T-EAT-10 ≥3), 27.3% (n = 33) had concomitant neuropathy and 28.1% (n = 34) mentioned a reflux complaint. The results of the multivariate linear regression analysis exposed that the T-EAT-10 score was significantly associated with neuropathy (r = 3.763, p < 0.001) and reflux complaint (r = 2.254, p = 0.031). Of the total FEES-tested subjects (n = 20), 95% (n = 19) had a safe swallowing function (PAS = 1). However, diminished laryngeal sensation, increased secretion and presence of residue revealed that patients with T2DM who have self-reported swallowing difficulties have reduced swallowing efficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated that almost 1 out of 4 T2DM patients reported to have swallowing-related problems, and the score of the T-EAT-10 was found to be independently associated with both neuropathy and reflux complaint. FEES results pointed out that swallowing efficiency was relatively reduced in the target population. However, further research is still necessary before obtaining a definitive answer to oropharyngeal swallowing problems in patients with T2DM.

Gender, medication use and other factors associated with esophageal motility disorders in non-obstructive dysphagia

Background

High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) is the diagnostic test of choice for evaluation of non-obstructive dysphagia. Studies regarding the predictors of esophageal dysmotility are limited. Therefore, our aim was to study the prevalence of and factors associated with esophageal motility disorders in patients with non-obstructive dysphagia.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of all patients with non-obstructive dysphagia who underwent HREM in a tertiary center between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2015. After obtaining IRB approval (16-051), clinical records were scrutinized for demographic data, symptoms, medication use, upper endoscopic findings and esophageal pH findings. HREM plots were classified per Chicago Classification version 3.0. Primary outcome was prevalence of esophageal motility disorders; secondary outcomes assessed predictive factors.

Results

In total, 155 patients with non-obstructive dysphagia (55 ± 16 years old, 72% female) were identified. HREM diagnosis was normal in 49% followed by ineffective esophageal motility in 20%, absent contractility in 7.1%, achalasia type II in 5.8%, outflow obstruction in 5.2%, jackhammer esophagus in 4.5%, distal esophageal spasm in 3.9%, fragment peristalsis in 1.9%, achalasia type I in 1.9%, and achalasia type III in 0.6%. Men were five times more likely to have achalasia than women [odds ratio (OR) 5.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0-14.2; P = 0.001]. Patients with erosive esophagitis (OR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.1-7.7; P = 0.027) or using calcium channel blockers (OR 3.0, 95% CI: 1.2-7.4; P = 0.015) were three times more likely to have hypomotility disorders.

Conclusion

From this study, we concluded that HREM diagnosis per Chicago Classification version 3.0 was normal in 49% of patients with non-obstructive dysphagia. Male gender, erosive esophagitis and use of calcium channel blockers were predictive of esophageal motility disorders.