Severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: does the dosage of corticosteroids and type of antibiotic matter?

Short- Versus Standard-Course Nonmacrolide Antibiotic Treatment in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective, Observational Cohort Study

PURPOSE

In critically ill patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and without positive microbiological data, the efficacy and tolerability of short-course nonmacrolide antibiotics are ill-described and have pertinent implications in antimicrobial stewardship. This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of nonmacrolide antibiotic strategies in critically ill patients with AECOPD and without pertinent positive microbiological testing.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted in culture-negative critically ill adults admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) between July 1, 2014, and July 1, 2019, for the treatment of AECOPD. Included patients received treatment with an empiric corticosteroid, azithromycin, and/or a nonmacrolide antibiotic. Patients treated with a nonmacrolide antibiotic for ≤3 and >3 days made up the short- and standard-course groups, respectively. The prevalence of in-hospital mortality, progression to the need for ventilation, and/or readmission for AECOPD within 30 days (primary composite end point) was compared between the two groups. Additional end points included hospital and ICU lengths of stay (LOS), all-cause 30-day readmission, and prevalence of antibiotic-related adverse events.

FINDINGS

A total of 135 patients were included (short course, 66; standard course, 69). The differences in the primary composite end point (short vs standard, 24.2% vs 39.1%; P = 0.06) and its individual components were not significant. The median ICU LOS (2 vs 3 days) and hospital LOS (4 vs 6 days) were shorter in the short-course group (both, P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression confirmed no association between group assignment and the primary end point.

IMPLICATIONS

Short-course nonmacrolide therapy in patients with AECOPD and no positive microbiological testing was not associated with differences in mortality, progression to ventilation, readmission rate, or prevalence of adverse drug events. Larger-scale prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Nonantimicrobial Actions of Macrolides: Overview and Perspectives for Future Development

Macrolides are among the most widely prescribed broad spectrum antibacterials, particularly for respiratory infections. It is now recognized that these drugs, in particular azithromycin, also exert time-dependent immunomodulatory actions that contribute to their therapeutic benefit in both infectious and other chronic inflammatory diseases. Their increased chronic use in airway inflammation and, more recently, of azithromycin in COVID-19, however, has led to a rise in bacterial resistance. An additional crucial aspect of chronic airway inflammation, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as well as other inflammatory disorders, is the loss of epithelial barrier protection against pathogens and pollutants. In recent years, azithromycin has been shown with time to enhance the barrier properties of airway epithelial cells, an action that makes an important contribution to its therapeutic efficacy. In this article, we review the background and evidence for various immunomodulatory and time-dependent actions of macrolides on inflammatory processes and on the epithelium and highlight novel nonantibacterial macrolides that are being studied for immunomodulatory and barrier-strengthening properties to circumvent the risk of bacterial resistance that occurs with macrolide antibacterials. We also briefly review the clinical effects of macrolides in respiratory and other inflammatory diseases associated with epithelial injury and propose that the beneficial epithelial effects of nonantibacterial azithromycin derivatives in chronic inflammation, even given prophylactically, are likely to gain increasing attention in the future. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Based on its immunomodulatory properties and ability to enhance the protective role of the lung epithelium against pathogens, azithromycin has proven superior to other macrolides in treating chronic respiratory inflammation. A nonantibiotic azithromycin derivative is likely to offer prophylactic benefits against inflammation and epithelial damage of differing causes while preserving the use of macrolides as antibiotics.

Associations among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with asthma, pneumonia, and corticosteroid use in the general population

Purpose

To evaluate the association among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with asthma, steroid use, and pneumonia in the general population.

Methods

Using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database to identify patients with incident pneumonia, we established a COPD with asthma cohort of 12,538 patients and a COPD cohort of 25,069 patients. In both cohorts, the risk of incident pneumonia was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for incident pneumonia was 2.38 (2.14, 2.66) in the COPD with asthma cohort, regardless of age, sex, comorbidities, and drug use. COPD cohort without inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) use served as a reference. The aHR (95% CI) for COPD cohort with ICSs use was 1.34 (0.98, 1.83); that for COPD with asthma cohort without ICSs use was 2.46 (2.20, 2.76); and that for COPD with asthma cohort with ICSs use was 2.32 (1.99, 2.72). COPD cohort without oral steroids (OSs) use served as a reference; the aHR (95% CI) for COPD with asthma cohort without OSs use and with OSs use was 3.25 (2.72, 3.89) and 2.38 (2.07, 2.74), respectively.

Conclusions

The COPD with asthma cohort had a higher risk of incident pneumonia, regardless of age, sex, comorbidities, and ICSs or OSs use. COPD cohort with ICSs use did not have a notable risk of incident pneumonia. The COPD with asthma cohort had a higher risk of incident pneumonia, even without ICSs/OSs use.

Clinical Outcomes Of Using Nebulized Budesonide As The Initial Treatment For Acute Exacerbations Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Post-Hoc Analysis

Purpose

The current guidelines recommend the use of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) as the optimal treatment for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). The aim of this real-world study was to evaluate whether nebulized budesonide (NBS) could also be used as an initial treatment for AECOPD.

Patients and methods

AECOPD patients initially treated with NBS or SCS (oral/intravenous) were enrolled. A large-scale, long-term multicenter cohort study of AECOPD patients was performed to analyze outcomes for each treatment (NCT02051166).

Results

Initial NBS and SCS treatment resulted in similar outcomes in terms of improvements in FEV₁, PaO₂, SaO₂, and PaCO₂. Disease severity affected outcome similarly in both groups. When the groups were stratified according to whether the initial treatment was subsequently intensified or reduced, more intubation was seen in the groups in which initial treatment was intensified. NBS escalation and SCS reduction groups spent more days in the hospital. The NBS escalation group was associated with the highest medical expenditure and a relatively higher rate of new-onset pneumonia. The NBS maintenance/reduction group showed the lowest mortality rate between groups. Stratification according to initial PaCO₂ level showed more intubation in the groups with high initial PaCO₂ concentrations.

Conclusion

These results indicate that NBS may be used as an initial treatment in certain AECOPD patients, and further studies are needed to better define those most likely to benefit.

Impact of Macrolide Antibiotics on Hospital Readmissions and Other Clinically Important Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess whether a macrolide-based antibiotic treatment strategy reduces in-hospital mortality, decreases hospital readmissions, or improves other clinically important outcomes compared with a non-macrolide antibiotic treatment strategy in critically ill patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).

DESIGN

Propensity score-matched pharmacoepidemiologic cohort study.

DATA SOURCE

Premier's Perspective Hospital Database.

PATIENTS

A total of 28,700 adults aged 40 years or older who were admitted to one of 566 United States intensive care units and had the primary diagnosis of AECOPD between January 2010 and December 2014 and received antibiotic treatment within 2 days of hospital admission were included. Patients were divided into macrolide (11,602 patients [40%]) or non-macrolide (17,098 patients [60%]) antibiotic treatment groups. Propensity score analysis successfully matched 8660 patients in each treatment group.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In the matched cohort, the macrolide treatment group was not associated with decreased hospital mortality after day 2 (3.0% vs 3.3%, p=0.28), intensive care unit length of stay (2 days vs 2 days, p=0.12), hospital length of stay (6 days vs 6 days, p=0.86), or length of assisted ventilation (3 days vs 3 days, p=0.71), compared with the non-macrolide treatment group. However, a macrolide-based antibiotic regimen was associated with an overall reduction in 30-day hospital readmissions (7.3% vs 8.8%, p<0.01), increased time to next all-cause (159 vs 130 days, p<0.01) or AECOPD (200 vs 175 days, p=0.03) readmission, and decreased hospital costs ($32,730 vs $34,021, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that inclusion of a macrolide antibiotic in the treatment regimen may have both acute and sustained benefits in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit with an AECOPD, including reductions in hospital readmissions and improvements in time to next readmission.

Antibiotics for treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta-analysis

Background

Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is the most common reason for the hospitalization and death of pulmonary patients. The use of antibiotics as adjuvant therapy for AECOPD, however, is still a matter of debate.

Methods

In this study, we searched the PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials published until September 2016 that evaluated the use of antibiotics for AECOPD treatment. The major outcome variables were clinical cure rate and adverse effects. The microbiological response rate, relapse of exacerbation, and mortality were also analysed. A random-effect network was used to assess the effectiveness and tolerance of each antibiotic used for AECOPD treatment.

Results

In this meta-analysis, we included 19 articles that assessed 17 types of antibiotics used in 5906 AECOPD patients. The cluster ranking showed that dirithromycin had a high clinical cure rate with a low rate of adverse effects. Ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had high clinical cure rates with median rates of adverse effects. In terms of the microbiological response rate, only doxycycline was significantly better than placebo (odds ratio (OR), 3.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.96–7.54; p < 0.001). There were no other significant results with respect to the frequency of recurrence or mortality.

Conclusions

Our study indicated that dirithromycin is adequate for improving the clinical cure rate of patients with AECOPD with few adverse effects. Ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are also recommended for disease treatment. However, caution should still be exercised when using antibiotics to treat AECOPD.

Trial Registration Not applicable.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0541-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Management of Acute Exacerbation of Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Emergency Department

Acute asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are the most common respiratory diseases requiring emergent medical evaluation and treatment. Asthma and COPD are chronic, debilitating disease processes that have been differentiated traditionally by the presence or absence of reversible airflow obstruction. Asthma and COPD exacerbations impose an enormous economic burden on the US health care budget. In daily clinical practice, it is difficult to differentiate these 2 obstructive processes based on their symptoms, and on their nearly identical acute treatment strategies; major differences are important when discussing anatomic sites involved, long-term prognosis, and the nature of inflammatory markers.

Sequential invasive-noninvasive mechanical ventilation weaning strategy for patients after tracheostomy

BACKGROUND

Because the continuity and integrity of the trachea are likely damaged to some extent after tracheostomy, the implementation of sequential ventilation has certain difficulties, and sequential invasive-noninvasive ventilation on patients after tracheostomy is less common in practice. The present study aimed to investigate the feasibility of invasive-noninvasive sequential weaning strategy in patients after tracheostomy.

METHODS

Fifty patients including 24 patients with withdrawal of mechanical ventilation (conventional group) and 26 patients with sequential invasive-noninvasive weaning by directly plugging of tracheostomy (sequential group) were analyzed retrospectively after appearance of pulmonary infection control (PIC) window. The analysis of arterial blood gases, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence, the total duration of mechanical ventilation, the success rate of weaning and total cost of hospitalization were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Arterial blood gas analysis showed that the sequential weaning group was better than the conventional weaning group 1 and 24 hours after invasive ventilation. The VAP incidence was lowered, the duration of mechanical ventilation shortened, the success rate of weaning increased, and the total cost of hospitalization decreased.

CONCLUSION

Sequential invasive-noninvasive ventilator weaning is feasible in patients after tracheostomy.