Provocative challenges to help diagnose and monitor asthma: exercise, methacholine, adenosine, and mannitol

Recommendations for asthma monitoring in children: A PeARL document endorsed by APAPARI, EAACI, INTERASMA, REG, and WAO

Monitoring is a major component of asthma management in children. Regular monitoring allows for diagnosis confirmation, treatment optimization, and natural history review. Numerous factors that may affect disease activity and patient well-being need to be monitored: response and adherence to treatment, disease control, disease progression, comorbidities, quality of life, medication side-effects, allergen and irritant exposures, diet and more. However, the prioritization of such factors and the selection of relevant assessment tools is an unmet need. Furthermore, rapidly developing technologies promise new opportunities for closer, or even "real-time," monitoring between visits. Following an approach that included needs assessment, evidence appraisal, and Delphi consensus, the PeARL Think Tank, in collaboration with major international professional and patient organizations, has developed a set of 24 recommendations on pediatric asthma monitoring, to support healthcare professionals in decision-making and care pathway design.

Precision Medicine and Childhood Asthma: A Guide for the Unwary

Many thousands of articles relating to asthma appear in medical and scientific journals each year, yet there is still no consensus as to how the condition should be defined. Some argue that the condition does not exist as an entity and that the term should be discarded. The key feature that distinguishes it from other respiratory diseases is that airway smooth muscles, which normally vary little in length, have lost their stable configuration and shorten excessively in response to a wide range of stimuli. The lungs' and airways' limited repertoire of responses results in patients with very different pathologies experiencing very similar symptoms and signs. In the absence of objective verification of airway smooth muscle (ASM) lability, over and underdiagnosis are all too common. Allergic inflammation can exacerbate symptoms but given that worldwide most asthmatics are not atopic, these are two discrete conditions. Comorbidities are common and are often responsible for symptoms attributed to asthma. Common amongst these are a chronic bacterial dysbiosis and dysfunctional breathing. For progress to be made in areas of therapy, diagnosis, monitoring and prevention, it is essential that a diagnosis of asthma is confirmed by objective tests and that all co-morbidities are accurately detailed.

Different cutoff values of methacholine bronchial provocation test depending on age in children with asthma

BACKGROUND

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is a fundamental pathophysiological characteristic of asthma. Although several factors such as airway caliber can affect BHR, no study has established age-dependent cutoff values of BHR to methacholine for the diagnosis of asthma in children. We investigated the cutoff values of the methacholine challenge test (MCT) in the diagnosis of asthma according to age.

METHODS

A total of 2383 individuals aged from 6 to 15 years old were included in this study. MCTs using the five-breath technique were performed in 350 children with suspected asthma based on symptoms by pediatric allergists and in 2033 healthy children from a general population-based cohort. We determined the provocative concentration of methacholine producing a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second from baseline (PC₂₀). A modified Korean version of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questionnaire was used to distinguish asthmatics and healthy subjects. Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the cutoff value of PC₂₀ for the diagnosis of asthma.

RESULTS

Cutoff values of methacholine PC₂₀, which provided the best combination of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, showed an increasing pattern with age: 5.8, 9.1, 11.8, 12.6, 14.9, 21.7, 23.3, 21.1, 21.1, and 24.6 mg/mL at ages 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The application of different cutoff values of methacholine PC₂₀ depending on age might be a practical modification for the diagnosis of asthma in children and adolescents with asthmatic symptoms.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children with asthma: An observational cohort study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) was established by changes in lung function after exercise challenge. The prevalence of EIB and factors related to EIB were not fully described in children with asthma. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and predictors of EIB in children with asthma.

METHODS

A total of 149 children with physician-diagnosed asthma above 5 years of age underwent standardized treadmill exercise challenge for EIB and methacholine challenge for airway hyper-responsiveness from October 2015 to December 2016.

RESULTS

EIB presented in 52.5% of children with asthma. Compared with children without EIB, there were more patients with atopic dermatitis in children with EIB (p = 0.038). Allergic to Dermatohagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae were also found more in children with EIB (p = 0.045 and 0.048 respectively). Maximal decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) were highest in patients who were most sensitive to methacholine provocation (provocation concentration causing 20% fall in FEV1 [PC₂₀] ≤ 1 mg/mL). Patients, who were more sensitive to methacholine challenge (with lower PC₂₀ levels), develop EIB with more decline in FEV₁ after exercise challenge (p = 0.038). Among patients with EIB, airflow limitation development in patient with methacholine-induced airway hyper-responsiveness was more abrupt and severe compared with patients without airway hyper-responsiveness (p = 0.045 and 0.033 respectively).

CONCLUSION

EIB presented in 52.5% of children with asthma. The more severe methacholine-induced hyper-responsiveness, the higher prevalence of EIB as well as the severity.

The role of airway hyperresponsiveness measured by methacholine challenge test in defining asthma severity in asthma-obesity syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Asthma is a complex disease defined by chronic inflammation of the airways. In research and clinical practice measures used for diagnosis, an assessment of control and severity of asthma are varied and there exists no gold standard. To date, several studies have explored the link between obesity and asthma although the exact mechanism is not yet fully understood. A study undertaken by our research group in 2015, on the effects of weight loss on asthma severity in obese asthmatics, demonstrated that an improvement in airway hyperresponsiveness could be achieved after significant weight reduction with a weight loss program. The objective of this article is to review the current literature for the primary and secondary outcomes studied to estimate the effects of weight loss on asthma severity in adults with obesity and asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

A review of the most recent research conducted since 2014 demonstrates that effects of weight loss on asthma severity in adults with obesity and asthma has not been the focus of majority of the studies. Apart from our study published in 2015, very few studies used airway hyperresponsiveness as the primary or secondary outcome measure. The literature reveals that significant weight loss does, however, lead to improvement in asthma severity and control in adults with obesity and asthma.

SUMMARY

The current literature suggests that improvement in lung function requires moderate to significant (5-10%) weight loss in adults with obesity and asthma. However, with a few exceptions, the majority of these studies were small and used variable and questionable asthma severity outcome measures. There is an urgent need for standardization of diagnosis of asthma, study inclusion criteria, and outcome measures to assess asthma severity in research setting. Long-term effects of weight loss interventions on asthma severity and control, in adults with obesity and asthma, also remain unanswered.

Can exhaled nitric oxide be a surrogate marker of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in steroid-naive asthmatic children?

BACKGROUND

The interrelation between airway inflammation, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and atopy remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to document whether exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) may be used as a surrogate marker that predicts BHR to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) in steroid-naive school children with asthma.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of steroid-naive school age children with atopic and non-atopic asthma. All patients whose eNO levels had been measured and who had been challenged with both methacholine (MCH) and AMP were included. Receiver operation characteristic analysis was performed, in both the atopic and the non-atopic groups, to evaluate the ability of eNO to detect the BHR to AMP.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixteen patients, sixty-nine (59.5%) of whom had been atopic, were included in the analysis. In the atopic group, eNO values were significantly higher in patients with BHR to AMP compared to those without BHR to AMP (51.9 ± 16.9 p.p.b. vs. 33.7 ± 16.4 p.p.b.; P < 0.001), whereas in the non-atopic group, the differences were not statistically significant (29.7 ± 16.9 p.p.b. vs. 22.6 ± 8.1 p.p.b.; P = 0.152). In the atopic group, eNO levels (R(2) : 0.401; β: 0.092; 95% CI: 1.19-14.42; OR: 7.12; P = 0.008) were found to be the only independent factor for BHR to AMP, whereas none of the parameters predicted BHR to AMP in the non-atopic group. The best cut-off value of eNO that significantly predicts BHR to AMP was 33.3 p.p.b. in the atopic group (P < 0.001), whereas a significant cut-off value for eNO that predicts BHR to AMP was not determined in the non-atopic group (P = 0.142). An eNO ≤ 17.4 p.p.b. has 100% negative predictive values and 100% sensitivity and 60.47% PPV for prediction of BHR to AMP in the atopic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Exhaled NO may be used to predict BHR to AMP in atopic but not in non-atopic steroid-naïve asthmatic children.

Diagnosis of asthma - new theories

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have shown a remarkably high frequency of poorly controlled asthma. Several reasons for this treatment failure have been discussed, however, the basic question of whether the diagnosis is always correct has not been considered. Follow-up studies have shown that in many patients asthma cannot be verified despite ongoing symptoms. Mechanisms other than bronchial obstruction may therefore be responsible. The current definition of asthma may also include symptoms that are related to mechanisms other than bronchial obstruction, the clinical hallmark of asthma.

AIM

Based on a review of the four cornerstones of asthma - inflammation, hyperresponsiveness, bronchial obstruction and symptoms - the aim was to present some new aspects and suggestions related to the diagnosis of adult non-allergic asthma.

CONCLUSION

Recent studies have indicated that "classic" asthma may sometimes be confused with asthma-like disorders such as airway sensory hyperreactivity, small airways disease, dysfunctional breathing, non-obstructive dyspnea, hyperventilation and vocal cord dysfunction. This confusion may be one explanation for the high proportion of misdiagnosis and treatment failure. The current diagnosis, focusing on bronchial obstruction, may be too "narrow". As there may be common mechanisms a broadening to include also non-obstructive disorders, forming an asthma syndrome, is suggested. Such broadening requires additional diagnostic steps, such as qualitative studies with analysis of reported symptoms, non-effort demanding methods for determining lung function, capsaicin test for revealing airway sensory hyperreactivity, careful evaluation of the therapeutic as well as diagnostic effect of corticosteroids and testing of suggested theories.

Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Airway Hyperresponsiveness to Adenosine 5'-monophosphate and Methacholine in Children with Asthma

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in the role of indirect bronchial challenges because clinical studies have shown that indirect airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) reflects underlying airway inflammation better than direct AHR. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) appears to be a useful clinical tool for assessing airway inflammation noninvasively. We examined whether FeNO is more closely related to AHR to indirect stimuli than AHR to direct stimuli in children with mild to moderate asthma.

METHODS

Fifty-nine asthmatic children aged 6-16 years without rhinitis, underwent spirometry, FeNO measurement and blood tests for serum total IgE, blood eosinophil count and serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). All subjects underwent methacholine and adenosine 5-monophosphate (AMP) challenge tests at intervals of 3 days.

RESULTS

In a univariate linear regression analysis, FeNO was significantly associated with both PC20 AMP (R(2) = 0.341, p < 0.001) and PC20 methacholine (R(2) = 0.188, p = 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, serum total IgE and blood eosinophil count, the association between FeNO and PC20 AMP (β = -1.98, p = 0.001) was more robust than that between FeNO and PC20 methacholine (β = -0.87, p = 0.081). The significant correlation between FeNO and PC20 AMP was observed in the steroid-naïve group (β = -2.48, p = 0.001), but not in the steroid-treated group (β = 0.88, p = 0.463).

CONCLUSIONS

FeNO levels were more closely associated with PC20 AMP than with PC20 methacholine. This relationship could only be seen in the steroid-naïve subjects. These results suggest that FeNO levels in children with asthma may be more closely related to indirect AHR than to direct AHR.

Respiratory disease and respiratory physiology: putting lung function into perspective: paediatric asthma

Dealing with paediatric asthma in daily practice, we are mostly interested in the airway function: the hallmark of asthma is the variability of airway patency. Various pulmonary function tests (PFT) can be used to quantify airway caliber in asthmatic children. The choice of the test is based on the developmental age of the child, knowledge of the diagnosis/underlying pathophysiology, clinical questions and reasoning, and treatment. PFT is performed to monitor the severity of asthma and the response to therapy, but can also be used as a diagnostic tool, and to study growth and development of the lungs and airways. This review aims to provide clinicians an overview of the differences in assessing PFT in infants and preschool children compared with older cooperative children, which tests are feasible in infants and young children, the limitations of and usefulness of these tests, and of their interpretation in these age groups.

Exhaled nitric oxide and other exhaled biomarkers in bronchial challenge with exercise in asthmatic children: current knowledge

The fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), a known marker of atopic-eosinophilic inflammation, may be used as a surrogate to assess exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in asthmatic children. The predictive value of baseline FENO for EIB appears to be influenced by several factors, including age, atopy, current therapy with corticosteroids and measurement technique. Nonetheless, FENO cut-off values appear to be able to rule out EIB. FENO levels decrease during EIB, apparently through neural mechanisms rather than by decreased airway-epithelial surface. Partition of FENO into proximal and peripheral contributions of the respiratory tract may improve our understanding on NO exchange during exercise and help to screen subjects prone to EIB. Other biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress contained in exhaled gases and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) may shed light on the pathophysiology of EIB. Exhaled breath temperature is a promising real-time measurement whose routine use for assessing EIB warrants further investigation.

An open-label study examining the effect of pharmacological treatment on mannitol- and exercise-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic children and adolescents with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Background

Mannitol- and exercise bronchial provocation tests are both used to diagnose exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The study aim was to compare the short-term treatment response to budesonide and montelukast on airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol challenge test and to exercise challenge test in children and adolescents with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

Methods

Patients were recruited from a paediatric asthma rehabilitation clinic located in the Swiss Alps. Individuals with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and a positive result in the exercise challenge test underwent mannitol challenge test on day 0. All subjects then received a treatment with 400 μg budesonide and bronchodilators as needed for 7 days, after which exercise- and mannitol-challenge tests were repeated (day 7). Montelukast was then added to the previous treatment and both tests were repeated again after 7 days (day 14).

Results

Of 26 children and adolescents with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, 14 had a positive exercise challenge test at baseline and were included in the intervention study. Seven of 14 (50%) also had a positive mannitol challenge test. There was a strong correlation between airway responsiveness to exercise and to mannitol at baseline (r = 0.560, p = 0.037). Treatment with budesonide and montelukast decreased airway hyperresponsiveness to exercise challenge test and to a lesser degree to mannitol challenge test. The fall in forced expiratory volume in one second during exercise challenge test was 21.7% on day 0 compared to 6.7% on day 14 (p = 0.001) and the mannitol challenge test dose response ratio was 0.036%/mg on day 0 compared to 0.013%/mg on day 14 (p = 0.067).

Conclusion

Short-term treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid and an additional leukotriene receptor antagonist in children and adolescents with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction decreases airway hyperresponsiveness to exercise and to mannitol.

What makes a difference in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: an 8 year retrospective analysis

Background

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) was recently classified into EIB alone and EIB with asthma, based on the presence of concurrent asthma.

Objective

Differences between EIB alone and EIB with asthma have not been fully described.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed who visited an allergy clinic for respiratory symptoms after exercise and underwent exercise bronchial provocation testing. More than a 15% decrease of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to the end of a 6 min free-running challenge test was interpreted as positive EIB.

Results

EIB was observed in 66.9% of the study subjects (89/133). EIB-positive subjects showed higher positivity to methacholine provocation testing (61.4% vs. 18.9%, p<0.001) compared with EIB-negative subjects. In addition, sputum eosinophilia was more frequently observed in EIB-positive subjects than in EIB-negative subjects (56% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.037). The temperature and relative humidity on exercise test day were significantly related with the EIB-positive rate. Positive EIB status was correlated with both temperature (p = 0.001) and relative humidity (p = 0.038) in the methacholine-negative EIB group while such a correlation was not observed in the methacholine-positive EIB group. In the methacholine-positive EIB group the time to reach a 15% decrease in FEV1 during exercise was significantly shorter than that in the methacholine-negative EIB group (3.2±0.7 min vs. 8.6±1.6 min, p = 0.004).

Conclusions

EIB alone may be a distinct clinical entity from EIB with asthma. Conditions such as temperature and humidity should be considered when performing exercise tests, especially in subjects with EIB alone.

Comparison of direct and indirect bronchoprovocation testing using ventilator-acquired pulmonary mechanics in healthy cats and cats with experimental allergic asthma

Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is a key feature of asthma and can be measured using bronchoprovocation. Direct (methacholine, MCh) or indirect (adenosine-5-monophosphate, AMP; or mannitol) bronchoprovocants are used in human patients, the latter inducing AHR only with pre-existing airway inflammation. The present study compared the responses to direct (MCh) and indirect (mannitol, AMP) bronchoprovocation in healthy and asthmatic cats (n=6/group). The order of bronchoprovocant was randomized using a published table of random numbers and there was a 1-month washout before crossover to the next treatment. Pulmonary mechanics were measured in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated cats using a critical care ventilator. Saline at baseline and increasing doses of each bronchoprovocant were aerosolized for 30 s, followed by 4 min of data collection between doses. The endpoint for each bronchoprovocant was reached when airway resistance exceeded 200% of baseline values (EC200Raw). There was a significant difference (P<0.001) in the airway response of asthmatic vs. healthy cats over the range of MCh concentrations, despite there being no significant difference in the EC200Raw between the groups. Response to MCh was significantly greater (P<0.05) in asthmatic than in healthy cats at MCh concentrations as low as 0.0625 mg/mL. For AMP, a small subset of asthmatics (n=2/6) responded at low concentrations; four asthmatic cats and all healthy cats failed to respond even to the highest concentrations of AMP. One asthmatic cat but no healthy cats responded to mannitol. In conclusion, MCh discriminated asthmatic from healthy cats but neither AMP nor mannitol was an effective bronchoprovocant in this model.

Bronchodilator responses after methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) challenges in children with asthma: their relationships with eosinophil markers

BACKGROUND

Bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) and eosinophilic inflammation are characteristic features of asthma. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the relationships of BDR after methacholine challenge or adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) challenge to blood eosinophil markers in children with asthma.

METHODS

Methacholine and AMP challenges were performed on 69 children with mild intermittent to moderate persistent asthma. BDR was calculated as the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, expressed as percentage change of the value immediately after the each challenge and the value after inhalation of salbutamol. Serum total IgE levels, blood eosinophil counts, and serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels were determined for each subject.

RESULTS

A positive relationship between serum total IgE levels and BDR was found only after the AMP challenge (R(2) = 0.345, p = .001) rather than after the methacholine challenge (R(2) = 0.007, p = .495). Peripheral blood eosinophil counts correlated more significantly with BDR after AMP challenge (R(2) = 0.212, p = .001) than BDR after methacholine challenge (R(2) = 0.002, p = .724). Both BDR after methacholine challenge (R(2) = 0.063, p = .038) and BDR after AMP challenge (R(2) = 0.192, p = .001) were significantly correlated with serum ECP levels.

CONCLUSION

BDR after AMP challenge may be more closely related to eosinophilic inflammation, compared with that after methacholine challenge.

Asthma outcomes: pulmonary physiology

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of pulmonary physiology have a central place in asthma clinical research.

OBJECTIVE

At the request of National Institutes of Health (NIH) institutes and other federal agencies, an expert group was convened to provide recommendations on the use of pulmonary function measures as asthma outcomes that should be assessed in a standardized fashion in future asthma clinical trials and studies to allow for cross-study comparisons.

METHODS

Our subcommittee conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed to identify studies that focused on the validation of various airway response tests used in asthma clinical research. The subcommittee classified the instruments as core (to be required in future studies), supplemental (to be used according to study aims and in a standardized fashion), or emerging (requiring validation and standardization). This work was discussed at an NIH-organized workshop in March 2010 and finalized in September 2011.

RESULTS

A list of pulmonary physiology outcomes that applies to both adults and children older than 6 years was created. These outcomes were then categorized into core, supplemental, and emerging. Spirometric outcomes (FEV(1), forced vital capacity, and FEV(1)/forced vital capacity ratio) are proposed as core outcomes for study population characterization, for observational studies, and for prospective clinical trials. Bronchodilator reversibility and prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator FEV(1) also are core outcomes for study population characterization and observational studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The subcommittee considers pulmonary physiology outcomes of central importance in asthma and proposes spirometric outcomes as core outcomes for all future NIH-initiated asthma clinical research.

Exhaled breath temperature and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic children

It has been hypothesized that exhaled breath temperature (EBT) is related to the degree of airway inflammation/remodeling in asthma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the level of airway response to exercise and EBT in a group of controlled or partly controlled asthmatic children. Fifty asthmatic children underwent measurements of EBT before and after a standardized exercise test. EBT was 32.92 ± 1.13 and 33.35 ± 0.95°C before and after exercise, respectively (P < 0.001). The % decrease in FEV(1) was significantly correlated with the increase in EBT (r = 0.44, P = 0.0013), being r = 0.49 (P < 0.005) in the children who were not receiving regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and 0.37 (n.s.) in those who were. This study further supports the hypothesis that EBT can be considered a potential composite tool for monitoring asthma.

Cromoglycate, reproterol, or both--what's best for exercise-induced asthma?

OBJECTIVE

International guidelines recommend short- (SABA) or long-acting b-agonists for the prevention of bronchoconstriction after exercise (EIB) in patients with exercise-induced asthma (EIA). However, other drugs are still in discussion for the prevention of EIB. We investigated the efficacy of a combination of inhaled sodium cromoglycate and the β-mimetic drug reproterol versus inhaled reproterol alone and both versus inhaled placebo in subjects with exercise-induced asthma (EIA).

METHODS

The study aimed to prove the preventive effect of a combination of 1-mg reproterol and 2-mg disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) and its single components vs. placebo, measuring the decrease of FEV1 after a standardized treadmill test in 11 patients with recorded EIA. The study medication was twice as high as those of drugs which are commercially available (e.g., Allergospasmin®, Aarane®).

RESULTS

The results revealed that the combination of reproterol and DSCG was significantly effective against a decrease of FEV1 after a standardized exercise challenge test (ECT) compared to placebo. The short-acting b-agonist reproterol alone had almost the same effectiveness as the combination of reproterol and DNCG. The difference between the combination with DNCG and reproterol alone was less than 10% and insignificant (p 0.48). DNCG alone did not show a difference in the effectiveness compared to placebo.

CONCLUSION

Prevention of EIA with the combination of reproterol and DSCG or with reproterol only is effective. An exclusive recommendation in favor of the combination cannot be given due to the low difference in the effectiveness versus reproterol alone. Due to the limited number of subjects and some probands showing protection under DSCG, it cannot be completely excluded that there is some preventive power of DSCG in individual cases.

Asthma in elite athletes: pathogenesis, diagnosis, differential diagnoses, and treatment

Elite athletes have a high prevalence of asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Although respiratory symptoms can be suggestive of asthma, the diagnosis of asthma in elite athletes cannot be based solely on the presence or absence of symptoms; diagnosis should be based on objective measurements, such as the eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea test or exercise test. When considering that not all respiratory symptoms are due to asthma, other diagnoses should be considered. Certain regulations apply to elite athletes who require asthma medication for asthma. Knowledge of these regulations is essential when treating elite athletes. This article is aimed at physicians who diagnose and treat athletes with respiratory symptoms. It focuses on the pathogenesis of asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in elite athletes and how the diagnosis can be made. Furthermore, treatment of elite athletes with asthma, anti-doping regulations, and differential diagnoses such as exercise-induced laryngomalacia are discussed.

Exercise challenge test: is a 15% fall in FEV(1) sufficient for diagnosis?

INTRODUCTION

In the exercise challenge test (ECT), a drop in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1)) of between 10 and 15% is the determinant variable for a diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchospasm.

HYPOTHESIS

The use of FEV(1) plus mean forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of the forced vital capacity (FEF(25-75%)) may increase the sensitivity of the ECT in asthmatic children.

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE

To compare FEV(1) and FEF(25-75%) changes in a group of asthmatic and healthy children.

METHODOLOGY

This was a cross-sectional study. Asthmatics were categorized by their severity (GINA) and after 1 month without controller therapy, an ECT was done under standard protocol. As well, a questionnaire about rhinitis and asthma was conducted with the entire population. ROC curves were used for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 147 children (34 healthy and 113 asthmatics, 18 and 58 males, respectively) were evaluated. Divided into healthy children and intermittent, mild and moderate persistent asthmatics, they had similar average ages (9.4, 9.48, 8.97, and 11.2 years, respectively). Using a 15% fall in FEV(1), we obtained 29% sensitivity and 100% specificity. However, when we used a 10% fall in FEV(1), sensitivity was 47% and specificity was 97%. Adding a 28% fall in FEF(25-75%), sensitivity was 52% and specificity was 94%.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that test sensitivity can increase by using a lower FEV(1) cut-off (10%) and adding a 28% fall in FEF(25-75%).

Methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) responsiveness, and the presence and degree of atopy in children with asthma

The relationship between atopy and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), both key features of asthma, remains to be clarified. BHR is commonly evaluated by bronchial challenges using direct and indirect stimuli. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of BHR to methacholine (direct stimulus) and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) (indirect stimulus) according to the presence and degree of atopy in children with asthma. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 120 children presenting with a diagnosis of asthma. These children were characterized by skin-prick tests (SPTs), spirometry and bronchial challenges with methacholine and AMP. Atopy was defined by at least one positive reaction to SPTs, and its degree was measured using serum total IgE levels, number of positive SPTs and atopic scores (sum of graded wheal size). A provocative concentration causing a 20% decline in FEV(1) (PC(20) ) was determined for each challenge. Patients with atopy(n=94) had a significantly lower AMP PC(20) than non-atopic patients (n=26), whereas methacholine PC(20) was not different between the two groups. Among the patients with atopy, there was no association between methacholine PC(20) and any atopy parameter. In contrast, a significant association was found between AMP PC(20) and the degree of atopy reflected in serum total IgE, number of positive SPTs and atopic scores (anova trend test, p=0.002, 0.001, 0.003, respectively). AMP responsiveness was associated with the presence and degree of atopy, whereas such a relationship was not observed for methacholine responsiveness. These findings suggest that atopic status may be better reflected by bronchial responsiveness assessed by AMP than by methacholine.

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine and adenosine monophosphate and the degree of atopy in children with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

nonasthmatic patients with allergic rhinitis often have bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Not only the presence but also the degree of atopy are important factors in BHR of patients with asthma. BHR is commonly evaluated by bronchial challenges using direct or indirect stimuli.

OBJECTIVES

to assess BHR to methacholine (direct) and to adenosine monophosphate (AMP) (indirect) in children with allergic rhinitis and to compare their relationships with the degree of atopy.

METHODS

methacholine and AMP challenges were performed in 88 children with allergic rhinitis, and a provocative concentration causing a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC(20)) was calculated for each challenge. The degree of atopy was measured using serum total IgE levels, number of positive skin prick test results, and atopic scores (sum of graded wheal size).

RESULTS

BHR to methacholine (PC(20) <8 mg/mL) and to AMP (PC(20) <200 mg/mL) was observed in 22 (25%) and 30 (34%) patients, respectively. No association was found between BHR to methacholine and any atopy parameter. In contrast, serum total IgE levels and atopic scores were higher in the group with BHR to AMP than in the group without BHR to AMP. Furthermore, a significant association was found between the degree of these 2 parameters and BHR to AMP (score for trend, P < .001 and P = .03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

both BHR to methacholine and BHR to AMP were detected in a significant proportion of children with allergic rhinitis. The degree of atopy seems to be an important factor in BHR to AMP but not in BHR to methacholine.

Mannitol as an indirect bronchoprovocation test for the 21st century

OBJECTIVES

To review mannitol challenge data and advocate the approval of this testing modality in the United States.

DATA SOURCES

A literature review was performed using the MEDLINE database for English-language articles published between January 1, 1993, and July 31, 2009, using the following keywords: mannitol bronchoprovocation test, inhaled mannitol, inhaled mannitol and asthma, and inhaled mannitol and exercise-induced asthma.

STUDY SELECTION

Trials were selected that established the effect of mannitol as a bronchoprovocation challenge, explored mannitol's mechanism of action, and compared mannitol to other accepted bronchoprovocation challenges.

RESULTS

Mannitol has demonstrated the ability to detect airway hyperreactivity in individuals. The mechanism of action is through the release of mast cell mediators. The sensitivity and specificity compare well with other indirect challenge testing methods.

CONCLUSION

Mannitol is a polyol sugar that can be converted to a powdered form and encapsulated. Once encapsulated it can be inhaled and causes narrowing of the airways in susceptible individuals. Mannitol likely triggers the release of inflammatory and/or bronchospasm mediators, causing the smooth muscle of the airway to contract and resulting in airway narrowing. The magnitude of decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and the dose of mannitol needed to provoke the airway response provide a readily measurable and clinically useful assessment of airway hyperreactivity. Mannitol challenge is an accepted testing method in Australia, Europe, and Korea. Acceptance of the mannitol challenge in the United States would complement existing methods for assessing bronchial hyperreactivity and likely improve patient care.

The inflammatory basis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is common in individuals with asthma, and may be observed even in the absence of a clinical diagnosis of asthma. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction can be diagnosed via standardized exercise protocols, and anti-inflammatory therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is often warranted. Exercise-related symptoms are commonly reported in primary care; however, access to standardized exercise protocols to assess EIB are often restricted because of the need for specialized equipment, as well as time constraints. Symptoms and lung function remain the most accessible indicators of EIB, yet these are poor predictors of its presence and severity. Evidence suggests that exercise causes the airways to narrow as a result of the osmotic and thermal consequences of respiratory water loss. The increase in airway osmolarity leads to the release of bronchoconstricting mediators (eg, histamine, prostaglandins, leukotrienes) from inflammatory cells (eg, mast cells and eosinophils). The objective assessment of EIB suggests the presence of airway inflammation, which is sensitive to ICS in association with a responsive airway smooth muscle. Surrogate tests for EIB, such as eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea or the osmotic challenge tests, cause airway narrowing via a similar mechanism, and a response indicates likely benefit from ICS therapy. The complete inhibition of EIB with ICS therapy in individuals with asthma may be a useful marker of control of airway pathology. Furthermore, inhibition of EIB provides additional, useful information regarding the identification of clinical control based on symptoms and lung function. This article explores the inflammatory basis of EIB in asthma as well as the effect of ICS on the pathophysiology of EIB.

Bronchial hyper-reactivity in migraine without aura: is it a new clue for inflammation?

OBJECTIVE

We attempted to investigate the relationship between migraine without aura (MwoA) and bronchial hyper-reactivity to postulate inflammation as an underlying mechanism in migraine.

BACKGROUND

Comorbidity of migraine and atopic diseases such as asthma has been an argument for suspected immune system dysfunction in migraineurs.

METHODS

Twenty patients with MwoA and 5 control subjects without history of atophy and asthma were included in study. Subjects with abnormal physical examination and chest radiographs were excluded. After a normal spirometry, methacholine bronchoprovocation test was performed in all subjects and controls according to 5 breath dosimeter methods.

RESULTS

Sixteen of 20 patients and 2 of 5 control subjects were women. Mean ages were 37.5 (19-56) and 33.8 (26-43) years, respectively. Methacholine bronchoprovocation test was positive in 3 patients (15%) but was normal in all controls (0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between MwoA and bronchial hyper-reactivity may help to postulate the inflammation in migraine as an underlying mechanism.

Exercise but not mannitol provocation increases urinary Clara cell protein (CC16) in elite swimmers

Elite swimmers have an increased risk of developing asthma, and exposure to chloramine is believed to be an important trigger factor. The aim of the present study was to explore pathophysiological mechanisms behind induced bronchoconstriction in swimmers exposed to chloramine, before and after swim exercise provocation as well as mannitol provocation. Urinary Clara cell protein (CC16) was used as a possible marker for epithelial stress. 101 elite aspiring swim athletes were investigated and urinary samples were collected before and 1 h after completed exercise and mannitol challenge. CC16, 11β-prostaglandin (PG)F(2α) and leukotriene E(4) (LTE(4)) were measured. Urinary levels of CC16 were clearly increased after exercise challenge, while no reaction was seen after mannitol challenge. Similar to CC16, the level of 11β-PGF(2α) was increased after exercise challenge, but not after mannitol challenge, while LTE(4) was reduced after exercise. There was no significant difference in urinary response between those with a negative compared to positive challenge, but a tendency of increased baseline levels of 11β-PGF(2α) and LTE(4) in individuals with a positive mannitol challenge. The uniform increase of CC16 after swim exercise indicates that CC16 is of importance in epithelial stress, and may as such be an important pathogenic factor behind asthma development in swimmers. The changes seen in urinary levels of 11β-PGF(2α) and LTE(4) indicate a pathophysiological role in both mannitol and exercise challenge.

Increased muscarinic receptor activity of airway smooth muscle isolated from a mouse model of allergic asthma

The mechanisms leading to airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) in asthma are still not fully understood. AHR could be produced by hypersensitivity of the airway smooth muscle or hyperreactivity of the airways. This study was conducted to ascertain whether AHR in a murine model of asthma is produced by changes at the level of the airway smooth muscle. Airway smooth muscle responses were characterised in vitro in isolated trachea spirals from naive mice and from an acute ovalbumin (OVA) challenge model of allergic asthma. AHR was investigated in vivo in conscious, freely moving mice. Inflammatory cell influx into the lungs and antibody responses to the antigen were also measured. In vitro study of tracheal airway smooth muscle from naïve mice demonstrated concentration-related contractions to methacholine and 5-HT, but no responses to histamine or adenosine or its stable analogue, 5'-N-ethyl-carboxamidoadenosine. The contractions to 5-HT were inhibited by ketanserin and alosetron indicating involvement of 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(3) receptors, respectively. In an acute model of allergic asthma, OVA-treated mice were shown to be atopic by inflammatory cell influx to the lungs after OVA challenge, increases in total IgE and OVA-specific IgG levels and contractions to OVA in isolated trachea. In the asthmatic model, AHR to methacholine was demonstrated in conscious, freely moving mice in vivo and in isolated trachea in vitro 24 and 72h after OVA challenge. No AHR in vitro was seen for 5-HT, histamine or adenosine. These results suggest that, in our mouse model of asthma, changes occur at the level of the muscarinic receptor transduction pathway of coupling to airway smooth muscle contraction. These changes are maintained when tissues are removed from the inflammatory environment and for at least 3 days.

Diagnostic properties of inhaled mannitol in the diagnosis of asthma: a population study

BACKGROUND

A new indirect bronchial provocation test measuring airway responsiveness by using inhaled mannitol was recently introduced.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the diagnostic properties of airway responsiveness to inhaled mannitol in the assessment of asthma in an unselected sample of young adults.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-eight young adults randomly drawn from the nationwide civil registration list were challenged with inhaled, dry-powder mannitol. A respiratory specialist, blind to the test results, classified all 238 subjects with respect to the presence of asthma. The classification was based on respiratory symptoms, spirometric results, atopy, and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide values and response to inhaled beta(2)-agonists. On this basis, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were assessed to different cutoff values of the test. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed, and the accuracy of the test, defined as the area under the curve, was computed.

RESULTS

Fifty-one (21.4%) subjects had current asthma. Of 33 subjects with airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol, 30 had current asthma. The specificity and sensitivity were 98.4% (95% CI, 96.2% to 99.4%) and 58.8% (95% CI, 50.7% to 62.6%), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 90.9% (95% CI, 78.4% to 96.8%) and 89.8 (95% CI, 87.7% to 90.7%), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

In an unselected sample of young adults, bronchial provocation with inhaled dry-powder mannitol had a high diagnostic specificity for the diagnosis of asthma.