Fungal infections in lung transplant recipients

Risk Factors for Invasive Fungal Infection in Lung Transplant Recipients on Universal Antifungal Prophylaxis

Background

Many centers use universal antifungal prophylaxis after lung transplant, but risk factors for invasive fungal infection (IFI) in this setting are poorly described.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center cohort study including 603 lung transplant recipients assessed risk factors for early (within 90 days of transplant) invasive candidiasis (IC) and invasive mold infection (IMI) and late (90-365 days after transplant) IMI using Cox proportional hazard regression.

Results

In this cohort, 159 (26.4%) patients had 182 IFIs. Growth of yeast on donor culture (hazard ratio [HR], 3.30; 95% CI, 1.89-5.75) and prolonged length of stay (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03) were associated with early IC risk, whereas transplantation in 2016 or 2017 (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.70; HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.80, respectively) and female recipient sex (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30-0.93) were associated with reduced risk. Antimold therapy (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.78) was associated with lower early IMI risk, and female donor sex (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22-0.72) was associated with lower late IMI risk. Recent rejection was a risk factor for late IMI (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.02-2.95), and renal replacement therapy predisposed to early IC, early IMI, and late IMI (HR, 5.67; 95% CI, 3.01-10.67; HR, 7.54; 95% CI, 1.93-29.45; HR, 5.33; 95% CI, 1.46-19.49, respectively).

Conclusions

In lung transplant recipients receiving universal antifungal prophylaxis, risk factors for early IC, early IMI, and late IMI differ.

Prevention and Management of Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients

Anti-rejection medications are essential in preventing organ rejection amongst solid organ transplant recipients; however, these agents also cause profound immunosuppression, predisposing lung transplant recipients (LTRs) to infectious complications. The timely management including prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of such infectious complications is vital to prevent significant morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients and allograft dysfunction. LTRs are inundated with microbes that may be recognized as commensals in hosts with intact immune systems. Bacterial infections are the most common ones, followed by viral pathogens. Indications of a brewing infectious process may be subtle. Hence, the importance of adapting vigilance around isolated hints through symptomatology and signs is pivotal. Signals to suggest an infectious process, such as fever and leukocytosis, may be dampened by immunosuppressive agents. One must also be vigilant about drug interactions of antibiotics and immunosuppressive agents. Treatment of infections can become challenging, as antimicrobials can interact with immunosuppressive agents, and antimicrobial resistance can surge under antimicrobial pressure. Transplant infectious disease physicians work in concert with transplant teams to obtain specimens for diagnostic testing and follow through with source control when possible. This heavily impacts medical decisions and fosters a multidisciplinary approach in management. Furthermore, the reduction of immunosuppression, although it augments the risk of allograft rejection, is as crucial as the initiation of appropriate antimicrobials when it comes to the management of infections.

Imaging Findings in Aspergillosis: From Head to Toe

Aspergillosis is a mycotic infection induced by airborne fungi that are ubiquitous. Inhalation of Aspergillus conidia results in transmission through the respiratory tract. The clinical presentation is dependent on organism and host specifics, with immunodeficiency, allergies, and preexisting pulmonary disease constituting the most important risk factors. In recent decades, the incidence of fungal infections has increased dramatically, due in part to the increased number of transplants and the pervasive use of chemotherapy and immunosuppressive drugs. The spectrum of clinical manifestations can range from an asymptomatic or mild infection to a swiftly progressive, life-threatening illness. Additionally, invasive infections can migrate to extrapulmonary sites, causing infections in distant organs. Recognition and familiarity with the various radiological findings in the appropriate clinical context are essential for patient management and the prompt initiation of life-saving treatment. We discuss the radiological characteristics of chronic and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, as well as some of the typically unexpected extrapulmonary manifestations of disseminated disease.

Safety of Inhaled Amphotericin B Lipid Complex as Antifungal Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients

Inhaled formulations of amphotericin B are the most widely used antifungal prophylactic agents in lung transplant recipients, yet there are limited data on their safety. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of 603 consecutive patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2012 and 2017 and received antifungal prophylaxis with inhaled amphotericin B lipid complex (iABLC) from the day of transplantation until hospital discharge. Of 603 patients, 600 (99.5%) received ≥1 dose of iABLC, and 544 (90.2%) completed the recommended prophylactic course. In total, 4,128 iABLC doses (median, 5; range, 1 to 48 per patient) were administered; 24 patients received >3 months of therapy. Only one (0.2%) patient discontinued therapy due to a drug-attributable adverse event. During the first posttransplant year, 80 (13.3%) patients died (median time to death, 171 days; interquartile range [IQR], 80 to 272 days), and 3,352 (median, 6 per patient) lung biopsies were performed; 414 (68.7%) patients developed biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection. One-year adverse events in our cohort of lung transplant recipients treated with iABLC during transplant hospitalization matched national outcomes for rejection, graft loss, and death. iABLC is a safe and well-tolerated antifungal prophylactic agent in lung transplant recipients.

Care for the organ transplant recipient on the intensive care unit

All transplant recipients receive tacrolimus, mycophenolate and glucocorticoids and these drugs have many side-effects and drug-drug interactions. Common complications include surgical complications, infections, rejection and acute kidney injury. Infections as CMV and PJP can be prevented with prophylactic treatment. Given the complexity of organ transplant recipients a multi-disciplinary team of intensivists, surgeons, pharmacists and transplant specialists is essential. After heart transplantation a temporary pacemaker is required until the conduction system recovers. Stiffening of the heart and increased cardiac markers indicate rejection. An endomyocardial biopsy is performed via the right jugular vein, necessitating its preservation. For lung transplant patients, early intervention for aspiration is warranted to prevent chronic rejection. Risk of any infection is high, requiring active surveillance and intensive treatment, mainly of fungal infections. The liver is immunotolerant requiring lower immunosuppression. Transplantation surgery is often accompanied by massive blood loss and coagulopathy. Other complications include portal vein or hepatic artery thrombosis and biliary leakage or stenosis. Kidney transplant recipients have a high risk of cardiovascular disease and posttransplant anemia should be treated liberally. After postmortal transplantation, delayed graft function is common and dialysis is continued. Ureteral anastomosis complications can be diagnosed with ultrasound.

Medical Course and Complications After Lung Transplantation

Lung transplant prolongs life and improves quality of life in patients with end-stage lung disease. However, survival of lung transplant recipients is shorter compared to patients with other solid organ transplants, due to many unique features of the lung allograft. Patients can develop a multitude of noninfectious (e.g., primary graft dysfunction, pulmonary embolism, rejection, acute and chronic, renal insufficiency, malignancies) and infectious (i.e., bacterial, fungal, and viral) complications and require complex multidisciplinary care. This chapter discusses medical course and complications that patients might experience after lung transplantation.

Infectious diseases in solid organ transplant recipients: Analysis of autopsied cases in Japan

BACKGROUND

With the improvements in immunosuppressive agents and graft survival, infections such as mycoses have become major complications after solid organ transplantation (SOT).

METHODS

Our group has continuously updated an epidemiological database of visceral mycoses (VM) among autopsy cases in Japan since 1989. Data on infectious agents and clinical information were complied using similar procedures.

RESULTS

Among the all autopsied cases studied, 356 undergone SOT. Of these, 214 (60.1%) suffered from one or more types of infections, including 51 (14.3%) with VM. Thus, the incidence of VM was higher in SOT recipients than in non-transplanted cases (P < 0.0001). Aspergillus spp. (Asp) was the most predominant agent and Candida spp. was second. Specifically, among SOT recipients, Asp was the most predominant in liver and lung transplant recipients. Among the 217 autopsied liver transplants cases, the incidence of VM was highest in those with fulminant hepatitis (FH, P = 0.01). The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection tended to be higher in cases with mycosis (P = 0.06). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified FH (odds ratio, 3.61, 95% confidence interval 1.34-9.75; P = 0.03) as an independent risk factor for mycosis in liver transplant recipients.

CONCLUSION

This epidemiological analysis of autopsied cases provides a strong incentive to intensify efforts to diagnose and treat post-SOT infectious diseases.

[Invasive yeast diseases in solid organ transplant recipients]

Invasive yeast diseases are uncommon nowadays in solid organ transplant recipients. Invasive candidiasis (2%) usually presents during the first month after transplantation in patients with risk factors. Both common and transplant-specific risk factors have been identified, allowing very efficacious targeted prophylaxis strategies. The most common clinical presentations are fungaemia and local infections near the transplantation area. Cryptococcosis is usually a late infection. Its incidence remains stable and the specific risk factors have not been identified. When cryptococcosis is detected very early, transmission with the allograft should be considered. The most common clinical presentations include meningitis, pneumonia, and disseminated infection. Intracranial hypertension and immune reconstitution syndrome have to be considered. No therapeutic clinical trials have been conducted in solid organ transplant recipients, thus treatment recommendations are derived from data obtained from the general population. It is particularly important to consider the possibility of drug-drug interactions, mainly between azoles and calcineurin inhibitors. Both invasive candidiasis and cryptococcosis increase the mortality significantly in solid organ transplant recipients.

Performance of lateral flow device and galactomannan for the detection of Aspergillus species in bronchoalveolar fluid of patients at risk for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis

Early diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) remains difficult due to the variable performance of the tests used. We compared the performance characteristics of Aspergillus lateral flow device (LFD) in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) vs. BAL-galactomannan (GM), for the diagnosis of IPA. 311 BAL specimens were prospectively collected from patients who underwent bronchoscopy from January to May 2013. Patients at risk for IPA were divided into haematological malignancy (HEM) and non-HEM groups: solid organ transplants (SOT) (lung transplant (LT) and non-LT SOT); chronic steroid use (CSU); solid tumour (STU) and others. We identified 96 patients at risk for IPA; 89 patients (93%) were in the non-HEM groups: SOT 57 (LT, 46, non-LT SOT, 11); CSU 21; STU 6, other 5. Only three patients met criteria for IA (two probable; one possible). Overall sensitivity (SS) was 66% for both and specificity (SP) was 94% vs. 52% for LFD and GM respectively. LFD and GM performance was similar in the HEM group (SS 100% for both and SP 83% vs. 100% respectively). LFD performance was better than GM among non-HEM SOT patients (P = 0.02). Most false-positive GM results occurred in the SOT group (50.8%), especially among LT patients (56.5%). LFD performance was superior with an overall SP of 95.6% in SOT (P < 0.002) and 97% in LT patients (P = 0.0008). LFD is a rapid and simple test that can be performed on BAL to rule out IPA.

Risks and Epidemiology of Infections After Lung or Heart–Lung Transplantation

Nowadays, lung transplantation is an established treatment option of end-stage pulmonary parenchymal and vascular disease. Post-transplant infections are a significant contributor to overall morbidity and mortality in the lung transplant recipient that, in turn, are higher than in other solid organ transplant recipients. This is likely due to several specific factors such as the constant exposure to the outside environment and the colonized native airway, and the disruption of usual mechanisms of defense including the cough reflex, bronchial circulation, and lymphatic drainage. This chapter will review the common infections that develop in the lung or heart–lung transplant recipient, including the general risk factors for infection in this population, and specific features of prophylaxis and treatment for the most frequent bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. The effects of infection on lung transplant rejection will also be discussed.

Therapeutic approach to respiratory infections in lung transplantation

Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are at life-long risk for infections and disseminated diseases owing to their immunocompromised state. Besides organ failure and sepsis, infection can trigger acute and chronic graft rejection which increases mortality. Medical prophylaxis and treatment are based on comprehensive diagnostic work-up including previous history of infection and airway colonisation to reduce long-term complications and mortality. Common bacterial pathogens include Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus, whilst Aspergillus and Cytomegalovirus (CMV) are respectively the commonest fungal and viral pathogens. Clinical symptoms can be various in lung transplant recipients presenting an asymptomatic to severe progress. Regular control of infection parameters, daily lung function testing and lifelong follow-up in a specialist transplant centre are mandatory for early detection of bacterial, viral and fungal infections.

After transplantation each patient receives intensive training with rules of conduct concerning preventive behaviour and to recognize early signs of post transplant complications. Early detection of infection and complications are important goals to reduce major complications after lung transplantation.

Inhaled antibiotics for lower airway infections

Inhaled antibiotics have been used to treat chronic airway infections since the 1940s. The earliest experience with inhaled antibiotics involved aerosolizing antibiotics designed for parenteral administration. These formulations caused significant bronchial irritation due to added preservatives and nonphysiologic chemical composition. A major therapeutic advance took place in 1997, when tobramycin designed for inhalation was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Attracted by the clinical benefits observed in CF and the availability of dry powder antibiotic formulations, there has been a growing interest in the use of inhaled antibiotics in other lower respiratory tract infections, such as non-CF bronchiectasis, ventilator-associated pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mycobacterial disease, and in the post-lung transplant setting over the past decade. Antibiotics currently marketed for inhalation include nebulized and dry powder forms of tobramycin and colistin and nebulized aztreonam. Although both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency have approved their use in CF, they have not been approved in other disease areas due to lack of supportive clinical trial evidence. Injectable formulations of gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, ceftazidime, and amphotericin are currently nebulized "off-label" to manage non-CF bronchiectasis, drug-resistant nontuberculous mycobacterial infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and post-transplant airway infections. Future inhaled antibiotic trials must focus on disease areas outside of CF with sample sizes large enough to evaluate clinically important endpoints such as exacerbations. Extrapolating from CF, the impact of eradicating organisms such as P. aeruginosa in non-CF bronchiectasis should also be evaluated.

Clinical neurology in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is the only established therapeutic option for several end-stage respiratory diseases. Limited mostly by lack of suitable allografts, the results have measurably improved over the last decade. Numerous surgical and pharmaceutical improvements have had positive impact on outcomes. The potential for critical care issues and the need for interdisciplinary management remains paramount. Cardiac, renal, and metabolic complications are frequently encountered in the acute postoperative phase. Allograft rejection and infectious diseases as well as problems related to immunosuppressive regimen are seen later after lung transplantation. Neurologic manifestations with a range of etiologies are discussed here in this context.

Lung transplant infection

Lung transplantation has become an accepted therapeutic procedure for the treatment of end‐stage pulmonary parenchymal and vascular disease. Despite improved survival rates over the decades, lung transplant recipients have lower survival rates than other solid organ transplant recipients. The morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation is largely due to infection‐ and rejection‐related complications. This article will review the common infections that develop in the lung transplant recipient, including the general risk factors for infection in this population, and the most frequent bacterial, viral, fungal and other less frequent opportunistic infections. The epidemiology, diagnosis, prophylaxis, treatment and outcomes for the different microbial pathogens will be reviewed. The effects of infection on lung transplant rejection will also be discussed.

Italian guidelines for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients

Use of various induction regimens, of novel immunosuppressive agents, and of newer prophylactic strategies continues to change the pattern of infections among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Although invasive fungal infections (IFIs) occur at a lower incidence than bacterial and viral infections in this population, they remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In March 2008, a panel of Italian experts on fungal infections and organ transplantation convened in Castel Gandolfo (Rome) to develop consensus guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of IFIs among SOT recipients. We discussed the definitions, microbiological and radiological diagnoses, prophylaxis, empirical treatment, and therapy of established disease. Throughout the consensus document, recommendations as clinical guidelines were rated according to the standard scoring system of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the United Stated Public Health Service.

Clinical outcomes of lung-transplant recipients treated by voriconazole and caspofungin combination in aspergillosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is a serious cause of death among immune-compromised patients such as organ-transplant recipients. Recently, voriconazole has been approved for first-line therapy in IPA. Theoretically, optimal voriconazole blood level (superior to 1 mg/L according to recent studies) should be reached within 24 h. In practice, a significantly longer time seems to be needed in lung-transplant recipients. Therefore, caspofungin is now used in combination with voriconazole to provide cover against Aspergillus spp. infection during this gap. The first aim of this study was to investigate Aspergillus spp. infection treated with this combination and the atter's tolerability. The median time for attainment of apparently active blood levels in lung transplant recipients were compared between those with cystic fibrosis and those without.

METHODS

Lung-transplant recipients who received a combination of voriconazole and caspofungin between 2002 and 2008 as primary therapy were identified retrospectively. The median number of days to reach active voriconazole blood levels was compared between cystic fibrosis and other patients by Student's t-test. Statistical significance was defined by P-value <0.05.

RESULTS

Four patients were treated for Aspergillus colonization before transplantation and their culture were negative at 90 days. Eleven patients were treated for proven or probable invasive aspergillosis and 14 of them had a complete response. Hallucinations (n = 2) and significant hepatic toxicity (n = 2) were reported. Among the 15 studied transplant recipients, a median of 12.3 days was observed for active voriconazole blood levels to be reached. With cystic fibrosis patients, time tended to be longer than with other recipients (14.9 days vs. 8.3 days). Tacrolimus blood levels (between 5 and 15 ng/mL) may have been increased by voriconazole.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study describes practical experience in the management of this rare and severe disease in a referral centre for cystic fibrosis lung transplantation. Voriconazole and caspofungin combination was acceptably safe and was associated with good clinical outcomes in almost all patients. We showed that in 15 lung-transplant recipients a median of 12.3 days was required for voriconazole to reach high enough blood levels. Caspofungin in combination with voriconazole provides cover against Aspergillus infection during the period when voriconazole may be at subtherapeutic levels with good tolerability.

[Medical complications of lung transplantation]

In 2010, lung transplantation is a valuable therapeutic option for a number of patients suffering from of end-stage non-neoplastic pulmonary diseases. The patients frequently regain a very good quality of life, however, long-term survival is often hampered by the development of complications such as the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, metabolic and infectious complications. As the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome is the first cause of death in the medium and long term, an intense immunosuppressive treatment is maintained for life in order to prevent or stabilize this complication. The immunosuppression on the other hand induces a number of potentially severe complications including metabolic complications, infections and malignancies. The most frequent metabolic complications are arterial hypertension, chronic renal insufficiency, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and osteoporosis. Bacterial, viral and fungal infections are the second cause of mortality. They are to be considered as medical emergencies and require urgent assessment and targeted therapy after microbiologic specimens have been obtained. They should not, under any circumstances, be treated empirically and it has also to be kept in mind that the lung transplant recipient may present several concomitant infections. The most frequent malignancies are skin cancers, the post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, Kaposi's sarcoma and some types of bronchogenic carcinomas, head/neck and digestive cancers. Lung transplantation is no longer an exceptional procedure; thus, the pulmonologist will be confronted with such patients and should be able to recognize the symptoms and signs of the principal non-surgical complications. The goal of this review is to give a general overview of the most frequently encountered complications. Their assessment and treatment, though, will most often require the input of other specialists and a multidisciplinary and transversal approach.

Fungal infections after lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lung transplant's Achilles heel is chronic rejection. This is the reason why high immunosuppression is used, which leads to the development of infections. Fungal infections are a great obstacle in lung transplant patients' progress, not only because of their impact on patient survival, but also because fungal infections indirectly have an influence on the graft's progress. This review highlights the changing spectrum of invasive fungal infections as well as the most recent developments in diagnosis, prophylaxis, treatment and monitoring of lung transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fungal infections have a bimodal presentation: early onset, in relation to difficult postsurgeries and prior colonizations, and late onset, primarily in relation to chronic rejection and terminal renal insufficiency. The clinical impact of non-Aspergillus moulds is still unknown. Recent efforts have focused on nonculture-based methods to establish a rapid diagnosis. However, multicentre studies are needed to establish the diagnostic value of galactomannan antigen assay in invasive aspergillosis in lung transplantation. In addition, studies of the sensitivity and specificity of PCR assays are required to establish their diagnostic value. Unfortunately, only some advances in the diagnosis of aspergillosis have been achieved.

SUMMARY

Prophylaxis should be tailored according to the different individual patient's risk status. Combined treatments, including surgical therapy, may be useful in some patients.