Is There a Survival Benefit in Patients With Stage IIIA (N2) Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and/or Radiotherapy Prior to Surgical Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Pathologic Response and Survival after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Bevacizumab Followed by Surgery for Clinical Stage II/IIIA Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results from a Phase II Feasibility Study (NAVAL)

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between pathologic response and survival in patients with clinical stage II/IIIA nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who intended to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab, followed by surgery. In this phase II NAVAL study evaluating the feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin (75 mg/m2), pemetrexed (500 mg/m2), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg), followed by surgery, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed as the secondary endpoints. Patients were categorized based on the proportion of residual viable primary tumor in the resected specimen after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: those with residual tumor in less than one-third were classified as pathologic responders, the rest as nonresponders. Of the 30 patients, 25 underwent surgical resection after three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab; 5 did not undergo surgery. Among all 30 patients, the rates of 2- and 5-year PFS were 41.5% and 34.6%, respectively, and the rates of 2- and 5-year OS were 70.0% and 60.0%, respectively. A total of 6 patients (20%) were classified as pathologic responders; the other 24 (80%), as nonresponders. The five-year PFS differed significantly between pathologic responders (100%) and nonresponders (17.5%; p = 0.002). The five-year OS also differed significantly between pathologic responders (100%) and nonresponders (43.5%; p = 0.006). Pathologic response seems to be a predictor of survival. Long-term survival after surgery is expected for pathologic responders, whereas additional therapy is needed for nonresponders.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of phase 3 clinical trials

Objective

At present, several important trials have been published show that perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer, which further optimizes treatment options. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

The following databases were searched for relevant studies: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library (updated 12 October 2023). All randomized trials comparing perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in resectable non-small cell lung cancer were eligible for inclusion. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.1 (Cochrane collaboration software). Primary outcomes and measures included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), R0 resection rate, rate of underwent surgery and adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 2912 patients (1453 receiving perioperative immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and 1459 receiving chemotherapy alone) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The result showed that compared with chemotherapy alone, combined therapy significantly improved OS (HR = 0.68;95% CI: 0.56-0.83), EFS (HR = 0.58;95% CI: 0.51-0.65), pCR (OR = 7.53;95% CI: 4.63-12.26), MPR (OR = 5.03;95% CI: 3.40-7.44), R0 resection (OR = 1.58;95% CI: 1.152.18) and rate of underwent surgery (OR = 1.25;95% CI: 1.04-1.49). However, combination therapy was associated with higher risk of severe adverse event (OR = 1.46;95% CI: 1.19-1.78; P=0.0002), grade 3 and higher treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) (OR = 1.25;95% CI: 1.06-1.49; P=0.010), TRAE that led to interruption (OR = 1.90;95% CI: 1.34-2.68; P=0.0003) and immune-related adverse event (OR = 2.78;95% CI: 2.18-3.55; P<0.00001). Significant benefits were observed across most subgroups of EFS and pCR. However, no statistical differences were observed for EFS of never smoked (HR = 0.73;95% CI: 0.51-1.05) and EGFR-mutation positive (HR = 0.35;95% CI: 0.04-3.03).

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis found superior efficacy associated with perioperative immunotherapy plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in both tumor regression and prolonged survival in resectable NSCLC, but increased the risk of TRAE, so monitoring for adverse events is warranted.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier (CRD42023476786).

10-hydroxycamptothecin-loaded starch-based microcapsules with the stepwise responsive release strategy for targeted controlled release

Controlled and accurate drug release at the target site have been the focus of research. Especially in cancer therapy, economical, convenient and accurate delivery strategies could help to reduce the toxic effects of drugs on normal tissues and improve drug availability. In the study, glutathione (GSH)-responsive microcapsules (FA-RSMCs) were prepared by sonochemical method based on thiolated modified starch. 10-Hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) was designed as a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive polyprodrug (polyHCPT), which was loaded into the core of the microcapsules to obtain stepwise released drug delivery carriers. In the tumor microenvironment, FA-RSMCs first triggered GSH-responsive cleavage to release polyHCPT, followed by ROS-responsive cleavage of polyHCPT to release intact HCPT drug molecules. The results of experiments in simulated tumor microenvironment showed that FA-RSMCs exhibited good cascade-response release properties in vitro. It exhibited good anti-tumor ability and protection of normal cells in cytotoxicity in vitro. This strategy enhanced the accuracy and safety of targeted delivery of HCPT via microcapsules, which has potential for clinical application.

Immunotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: A system review

With the addition of immunotherapy, lung cancer, one of the most common cancers with high mortality rates, has broadened the treatment landscape. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are now used as the first-line therapy for metastatic disease, consolidation therapy after radiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced disease, and adjuvant therapy after surgical resection and chemotherapy for resectable disease. The use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC, however, is still debatable. We will address several aspects, namely the initial efficacy of monotherapy, the efficacy of combination chemotherapy, immunotherapy-related biomarkers, adverse effects, ongoing randomized controlled trials, and current issues and future directions for immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC will be discussed here.

The prognosis of clinical stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer in Taiwan

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. The treatment of stage IIIa remained the most controversial of all stages of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We reported on the heterogenicity and current treatment strategies of stage IIIa NSCLC in Taiwan. This study is a retrospective analysis using data from the Taiwan Society of Cancer Registry between January 2010 and December 2018. 4232 patients with stage IIIa NSCLC were included. Based on cell type, the best 5-year OS (40.40%) occurred among adenocarcinoma victims. The heterogenicity of T1N2 had the best 5-year OS (47.62%), followed by T4N0 (39.82%), and the others. Patients who underwent operations had better 5-year OS (over 50%) than those who did not (less than 30%). Segmentectomy (75.28%) and lobectomy (54.06%) showed better 5-year OS than other surgical methods (less than 50%). In multivariable analysis, young age, female, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index score, adenocarcinoma cell type, well differentiated, T1N2/T4N0 heterogenicity, treatment with operation, and segmentectomy/lobectomy/bilobectomy were significant factors. In conclusions, the heterogenicity of T1N2 had the best outcomes followed by T4N0. Patients received surgical treatment revealed much better outcomes than those did not. As always, multimodal therapies with individualized treatment tend to provide better survival outcomes.

What is the optimal management of potentially resectable stage III-N2 NSCLC? Results of a fixed-effects network meta-analysis and economic modelling

Introduction

There is a critical need to understand the optimal treatment regimen in patients with potentially resectable stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials was carried out using a literature search including the CDSR, CENTRAL, DARE, HTA, EMBASE and MEDLINE bibliographic databases. Selected trials were used to perform a Bayesian fixed-effects network meta-analysis and economic modelling of treatment regimens relevant to current-day treatment options: chemotherapy plus surgery (CS), chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (CR) and chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRS).

Findings

Six trials were prioritised for evidence synthesis. The fixed-effects network meta-analyses demonstrated an improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) for CRS versus CS and CRS versus CR of 0.34 years (95% CI 0.02-0.65) and 0.32 years (95% CI 0.05-0.58) respectively, over a 5-year period. No evidence of effect was observed in overall survival although point estimates favoured CRS. The probabilities that CRS had a greater mean survival time and greater probability of being alive than the reference treatment of CR at 5 years were 89% and 86% respectively. Survival outcomes for CR and CS were essentially equivalent. The economic model calculated that CRS and CS had incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £19 000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and £78 000/QALY compared to CR. The probability that CRS generated more QALYs than CR and CS was 94%.

Interpretation

CRS provides an extended time in a disease-free state leading to improved cost-effectiveness over CR and CS in potentially resectable stage III-N2 NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Improves Treatment for Early Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective

Immunotherapy has shown better efficacy and less toxicity than chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at advanced stage. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable NSCLC.

Methods

Literature examination was performed by searching the PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase for articles evaluating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable NSCLC. The 95% confidence interval (CI) and effect sizes (ES) were evaluated. Heterogeneity and subgroup analysis were performed. Meta-analysis was carried out using Stata BE17 software.

Results

In total, 678 patients from eighteen studies were recruited in this meta-analysis. The pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) were used to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Significantly higher MPR values were observed in neoadjuvant immunotherapy (MPR : ES = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.33–0.55; pCR : ES = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.15–0.30) compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (MPR < 25% and PCR : ES = 2%–15%). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), surgical resection rate, surgical delay rate, and incidence of surgical complications were used to evaluate the safety. In summary, ES values for the incidence of TRAE, incidence of surgical complications, and surgical delay rate were 0.4, 0.24, and 0.04, respectively, that were significantly lower than those for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (95% CI: 0.04–0.90; 0.22–0.75; and 0.01–0.10, respectively). The mean surgical resection rate of 89% was similar to the reported 75%–90% resection rate with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 7.61, 95% CI: 4.90–11.81).

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is safe and effective for resectable NSCLC.

Overall Survival and Biomarker Analysis of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy in Operable Stage IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NADIM phase II trial)

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus nivolumab has been shown to be effective in resectable non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the NADIM trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03081689). The 3-year overall survival (OS) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis have not been reported.

PROSPECTS OF NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH STAGE III A NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER AS A METHOD OF IMPROVING SURVIVAL

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To study the survival rate and count the number of complications in groups with NCRT, NCT and NCT + adjuvant radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: The studied patients were divided into three groups with a total number of 304 people, Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy-149 people, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiation therapy-90 people. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was performed in accordance with Cisplatin/Docetaxel or Carboplatin/Paclitaxel 4 Mg and simultaneous radiation therapy with a total radiation dose 30 gray with a single dose of 2 Mg. After neoadjuvant treatment, patients of all groups underwent radical surgery. It consisted of lobectomy, bilobectomy and pneumonectomy. Postoperative complications and the duration of stay in the clinic after surgery were studied. Survival was assessed on the Kaplan and Mayer scale.

RESULTS

Results: The study analyzed the main results of treatment, which showed that the 5 years survival in the main group was 28.1±5.9 %, in the control groups-the first control group (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) - 10.4±3.8 % and the second control group (neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiation therapy) - 5.8±2.0 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: 1. The overall survival rate of patients receiving NCT compared to patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy is higher than in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 13 months higher than in the adjuvant radiation therapy group. 2. Patients who had the phenomenon of a complete morphological response have a significantly higher survival rate (45 and 39 months, respectively).

Management of Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on management of patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary oncology, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts was convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2021. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 127 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address evaluation and staging workup of patients with suspected stage III NSCLC, surgical management, neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches, and management of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Important Surgical and Clinical End Points in Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Trials in Resectable NSCLC

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy may improve outcomes in patients with resectable NSCLC and is being evaluated in phase 2 and 3 studies. Nevertheless, preoperative treatment postpones resection; the potential for increased surgical complexity and greater intra- and postoperative morbidity and mortality is an additional consideration. In studies primarily designed to evaluate efficacy, the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on surgery is based on parameters that are poorly defined and reported differently between studies. Defining and reporting common end points among trials would improve understanding and facilitate cross-comparison of different immunotherapy regimens and may facilitate wider adoption of induction therapies by surgeons and oncologists. We propose several surgical end points and related metrics for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC. These include the periods from screening to treatment initiation and from last neoadjuvant dose to surgery; reporting of the allowable window for surgery to preclude masking delays caused by induction treatment-related toxicity; complete resection (R0) rate; preoperative downstaging; a standardized list of immune-related adverse events and associated delay to surgery; preoperative attrition; postoperative attrition before adjuvant therapy; and postoperative 30- and 90-day mortality and morbidity rates. Intraoperative end points (blood loss, duration, and type of surgery) and our proposed system of grading complexity based on lymphadenopathy and fibrosis would allow quantitation of technical difficulty and quality of oncologic resection. In conclusion, the standardization, reporting, and prospective inclusion of these end points in study protocols would provide a comparative overview of the impact of different neoadjuvant immunotherapy regimens on surgery and ultimately clinical oncologic outcomes in resectable NSCLC.

A narrative review of primary research endpoints of neoadjuvant therapy for lung cancer: past, present and future

Objective

This review summarizes the current status of neoadjuvant therapy and discusses the choice of new clinical research endpoints for non-small cell lung cancer.

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a recognized practice in patients with resectable and locally advanced lung cancer. With the introduction of molecular targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the overall survival (OS) of patients with lung cancer has been significantly improved, and the original traditional clinical research endpoints are no longer suitable for existing clinical research. In order to accelerate the process of clinical trials and the development and approval of drugs, it is necessary to find suitable alternative indicators as the main indicators of clinical research.

Methods

Therefore, this article focuses on clinical trials using disease-free survival (DFS), progression free survival, and pathological evaluation indicators, pathologic complete response and major pathologic response, as surrogate endpoints. We search related literature through PubMed database and clinical trials through clinicaltrials.gov.

Conclusions

Pathologic complete response and major pathologic response are recommended as surrogate endpoints in the era of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and secondary endpoints are listed for the prediction of pathological results. In addition, the definitions of major pathological response (MPR) and PCR should be standardized, and a new pathological evaluation standard should be developed, which is applicable to all current treatment methods.

Keywords

Neoadjuvant therapy; resectable lung cancer; clinical research endpoint; pathological response.

Advances in multimodal treatment for stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In Stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the accuracy of combined positron-emission tomography/computed tomography imaging (PET-CT), together with mediastinal staging techniques, has led to a wide range of challenging clinical scenarios in terms of therapeutic management. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation immunotherapy remains the standard of care. In patients with potentially-resectable disease, surgery plays an important role in multimodal therapy. The introduction of targeted therapies and immune-checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized multimodal treatment. In the present article, we review current treatment options and future trends in stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

This article provides insight into the current status of multimodal treatment for NSCLC to support decision-making in routine clinical practice.

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab with chemotherapy for the treatment of stage IIB-IIIB resectable lung squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Researches on programmed cell death (PD-1) as neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer is underway, which brings hope for individuals with the disease. However, a study dedicated to lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) specifically has yet to be conducted. Now, data from our pilot prospective research neoadjuvant study provide new insights in the field of neoadjuvant regimen for LUSC.

Methods

Between June 2019 and July 2020, 37 adults with untreated, surgically resectable stage IIB–IIIB LUSC were enrolled into this prospective study. Patients received 2 cycles of pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg) with chemotherapy (albumin-bound paclitaxel 100 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 + carboplatin AUC 5) via intravenous administration every 3 weeks, and underwent surgical treatment 3–4 weeks after the second cycle. The primary endpoint of the study was the tumor pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The toxicity profile, tumor major pathological remission, complete resection rate, response rate, and operative and postoperative complications were also evaluated.

Results

The postoperative pathological specimens of 17 (45.9%) patients suggested pCR. Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab with chemotherapy had an acceptable side-effect profile, and no patients withdrew from the study preoperatively due to disease progression or toxicity. A major pathological response occurred in 24 (64.9%) resected tumors. All tumors were completely resected (R0, 100%). According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RESIST), a response was evaluated before surgery in 32 (86.5%) patients by computed tomography. Twenty-five (67.6%) patients underwent thoracoscopic surgery. No deaths or postoperative major complications requiring reoperation occurred. Recurrence or metastasis was found in 2 patients during follow-up of 2–14 months.

Conclusions

The early outcomes of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting as a novel treatment for resectable stage IIB–IIIB LUSC showed a high pCR rate that has not been seen previously, as well as a high R0 resection rate and a low toxicity profile. The long-term efficacy of this novel treatment and the validity of the present findings should be confirmed with longer follow-up and prospective comparative trials.

Validation of the 8th Edition Nodal Staging and Proposal of New Nodal Categories for Future Editions of the TNM Classification of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) N classifications, which depend on the location and involvement of the lymph nodes, provide accurate prognoses. This study validated the efficiency of classifications using a single-institution dataset and proposed a modified system based on 5-level N1 node dissection.

METHODS

From January 2005 to December 2014, 1851 patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer were reviewed. According to the IASLC recommendations, N1 is further subdivided into N1a (single) and N1b (multiple), N2 is divided into N2a1 (single station without N1), N2a2 (single station with N1), and N2b (multiple station). Additionally, we evaluated dividing N0 into N0a (with level 13/14 examination) and N0b (without level 13/14 examination), and N1 into N1a* (only level 13/14 positive) and N1b* (level 10-12 positive). Overall survival was also compared.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed that the N classifications recommended by the IASLC and those proposed and evaluated by this study could both significantly predict the prognoses of patients (p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in survival between N1b and N1a (hazard ratio [HR] 1.049, p = 0.83) and N2a1 and N1b (HR 1.314, p = 0.261); however, there were significant differences between N0a and N0b (HR 1.778, p < 0.001) and N1a* and N1b* (HR 2.014, p = 0.019). The survival curve of N1a* overlapped N0b (HR 0.997, p = 0.991), and N2a1 overlapped N1b* (HR 0.842, p = 0.444).

CONCLUSION

More detailed nodal information is required to facilitate future revisions of N staging.

Surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer

Surgery is the standard of care for patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, as a single modality, surgery for early stage or locally advanced NSCLC remains associated with high rates of local and distant recurrence. The addition of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy has modestly improved outcomes. While systemic therapy paired with surgery for other malignancies such as breast cancer have resulted in far better outcomes for equivalent stage designations, outcome improvements for operable NSCLC have lagged in part as a result of trials where adjuvant chemotherapy seemed to incur harm for stage IA patients and only modest survival benefit for stage IB–IIIA patients (AJCC 7^th ed.). In recent years, immunotherapy for NSCLC has emerged as a systemic therapy with significant benefit over traditional chemotherapy regimens. These advances with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have opened the door to administering peri-operative immunotherapy for operable NSCLC. As a result, a great multitude of studies investigating the use of immunotherapy in combination with surgery for NSCLC as well as several other malignancies have emerged. In this review, we outline the rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment of operable NSCLC and summarize the available evidence that include preoperative ICI as a single modality or in combination with systemic agents and/or radiotherapy. Further, we summarize how such treatment trajectories open multiple unique windows of opportunity for scientific discovery and potential therapeutic gains for these vulnerable patients.

REFINED TAYLOR SERIES EXPANSION-BASED PREDICTION OF THE OVERALL SURVIVAL FOR NONSMALL CELL LUNG CANCER PATIENTS OF CLINICAL STAGE IIIA-N2 AFTER VARIOUS TREATMENTS: TAIWAN POPULATION-BASED STUDY OF 2655 CASES FROM 2010 TO 2017

The overall survival (OS) prediction for nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients of clinical IIIA-N2 stage undergone various treatments was investigated through a refined Taylor series expansion algorithm. The model was created according to a population-based study in Taiwan. The proposed prediction algorithm is based on the well-known hit and target model adopted for analyzing the cell death from the microscopic viewpoint. It also implies the application of the Taylor series expansion to the population-based survey dataset. In the proposed algorithm, the basic degradation of a patient’s health is represented via a specific function comprising a single exponential term exp([Formula: see text]). The refined algorithm successfully predicted NSCLC IIIA-N2 patients’ OS rate. A total of 127,301 patients were collected from 2010 to 2017. Then, 2655 patients were recognized as effective events and classified into eight classes according to various medical treatments, namely surgical operation, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. For each class of patients, the average life was evaluated, according to Taylor’s expansion algorithm, and the average derived life range spread from 3.51 to 7.81 years. An index of life gain with specific treatment was defined according to the Taguchi optimization analysis. The life gains provided by the surgical operation, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were 2.74, 1.18, and 0.48 years. The surgical operation was the most beneficial treatment, which is in concert with recommendations of European experts. A similar finding was also reflected in four out of eight classes, which included the surgical operation in the treatment plans of most Taiwanese hospitals.

Retrospective study of the incidence and outcomes from lung cancer in solid organ transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

Organ transplant recipients (OTR) have an increased risk of developing post-transplant malignancies with lung cancer being one of the most common. In this retrospective study, we investigated incidence, use of systemic therapy and outcomes from lung cancer in OTR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with lung cancer following a solid organ transplant at the University Health Network, Toronto, ON, CA, from January 1, 1980 to June 30, 2016 were included. Data for the study population, patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes were abstracted from solid OTR databases, our cancer registry and patient charts. Univariate Kaplan-Meier curves estimated median overall survival (OS) by histology, stage and systemic therapy.

RESULTS

Amongst 7944 OTR (heart [N = 765], lung [n = 1668], liver [n = 2238], kidney [n = 3273]), 101 (1.3 %) developed lung cancer which were included in our analyses. Of these, 81 % were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 11 % small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 8% neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Median OS (months) was 25 in those that presented with Stage I/II NSCLC (44 %); 25 for Stage III NSCLC (7%); 3 for Stage IV NCLC (31 %); 10 for Limited stage SCLC (6%); 2 for Extensive stage (ES) SCLC (5%). NSCLC patients that received palliative chemotherapy had an OS of 8 months; ES-SCLC patients that received chemotherapy had an OS of 6 months. Of all patients who received platinum doublets (n = 16), 10 (62.5 %) required dose reductions at some point. Five patients experienced febrile neutropenia (31 %); two (12 %) had other toxicities leading to discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Patients with stage I/II NSCLC and NET had poorer survival compared to historical norms in non-transplant patients. Patients who had stage III NSCLC or received palliative systemic therapy had survivals at or slightly below historic norms, although numbers were small. Chemotherapy can be administered in selected OTR patients though dose reductions and febrile neutropenia were common.

[Progress on PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Cancer]

In recent years, research on immunotherapy has made great progress. Currently, immunotherapy has made significant breakthrough, especially programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors (e.g, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Durvalumab and Avelumab, etc.) have brought clinical benefits to patients with various pathological types of lung cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and small cell lung cancer. In this paper, the application value and current status of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer were comprehensively analyzed by reviewing and interpreting representative clinical studies. Based on the results of various large-scale clinical trials results, the indications of immunotherapy in lung cancer have been continuously broadened, and the details of immunotherapy have also been constantly optimized. However, immunotherapy still faces many challenges, such as the selection of immune combination strategies, the exploration of biomarkers, the management of adverse events, the feasibility of application of driver gene mutation population and so on. In this article, we made a systematic review about the latest progress of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer, in order to provide cutting-edge reference for the clinical workers.
.

Optimal Surgical Timing After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Stage IIIa Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with clinically/pathologically diagnosed stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) considered for surgery are recommended to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation. The timing of an operation after therapy is not standardized; therefore, we investigated the timing of intervention after neoadjuvant therapy and the impact on outcomes in this demographic.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried between 2010 and 2015 for patients with clinical/pathologic stage IIIa NSCLC. Patients were then divided into short (<77 days), mid (77-114 days), and long delay (>114 days) groups based on interquartile values. These groups were then compared for age, race, gender, insurance type, Charlson-Deyo score, length of stay, readmission rate, and overall survival based on timing of operation.

RESULTS

There were 31,357 patients with clinical/pathologic stage IIIa NSCLC, and 5946 patients underwent surgical intervention. Preoperatively 3593 patients underwent chemoradiotherapy, 2185 underwent chemotherapy only, and 168 received radiation alone. The short, mid, and long delay groups were clinically and statistically similar in age, gender, insurance type, comorbidity index, treating facility type, and distance from home. Long delay groups had larger tumor size compared with other groups. Postoperative length of stay, rates of 30-day readmission, and 30- and 90-day mortality were similar across all groups. Cox modeling demonstrated a significant difference in survival when patients underwent earlier operative intervention compared with late operative intervention and when patients received chemoradiation compared with chemotherapy alone. Short, mid, and long delay group 1-year survivals were 82%, 83%, and 80% and 3-year survival 59%, 58%, and 52%, respectively (P = .0003).

CONCLUSIONS

The delay in surgical resection of stage IIIa NSCLC is not associated increased early mortality; however, it is associated with worse 3-year postresection survival.

Local treatment of stage IIIA-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer: surgery and/or radiotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment of patients with stage IIIA-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer because of its heterogeneity. Patients are at risk for both local and distant disease relapse after primary local treatment. However, there may be a window of opportunity for surgery, if mediastinal downstaging has been obtained after induction therapy. This manuscript reviews the outcome of patients treated by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NA-C) followed by surgery, compared with patients treated with either definitive sequential or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT), illustrated by a single-centre retrospective case series.

RECENT FINDINGS

Of 53 eligible patients, 19 received NA-C and underwent surgical resection, whilst 20 and 14 received concurrent or sequential definitive CRT, respectively. A significant difference in progression-free survival favouring NA-C followed by surgery over both CRT modalities was found. However, this translated only in an overall survival benefit in comparison with sequential definitive CRT. A trend for better outcome was observed in selected surgical patients with single-level mediastinal involvement and complete resection.

SUMMARY

Our case series results are consistent with the present standard of care of CRT, which restricts surgical resection to carefully selected patients. Immunotherapy will likely change the treatment paradigm.

Achievements and futures of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been threatening human health for years. Cytotoxicity-based chemotherapy seems to reach plateau in NSCLC treatment. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) against programmed cell death 1 (PD-1/L1) axis are to provide long-term survival benefits for wild-type advanced NSCLC patients with acceptable adverse effects. Though beneficiary population is limited from monotherapy, combination strategies are expanding indicators. Retrospective evidences suggested ICIs are also potentially useful for brain metastasis. Furthermore, the combination of ICIs and surgery are to prolong progression free survival time for local advanced patients. Additionally, novel agents targeting in immune checkpoints other than PD-1/L1 demonstrated potential values in anticancer immunity. Herein, we summarize the novel therapies of checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC treatment and some other potential immunotherapy to provide a conspectus for novel immunotherapy in NSCLC and perspective for the future in anti-cancer treatment.

Induction Therapies Plus Surgery Versus Exclusive Radiochemotherapy in Stage IIIA/N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

In spite of the growing body of data from prospective randomized clinical trials (PRCTs) and meta-analyses, the optimal treatment approach in patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer remains unknown. This review focuses on the available data directly confronting induction chemotherapy or induction radiochemotherapy (RT-CHT) when followed by surgery with exclusive RT-CHT. Seven PRCTs and 4 meta-analyses investigated this issue. In addition, numerous retrospective studies attempted to identify potential predictors and/or prognosticators that may have influenced the decision to offer surgery in a particular patient subgroup. Several retrospective studies also evaluated exclusive RT-CHT in this setting. There is not a single piece of the highest level of evidence (PRCT or MA) showing any advantage of induction therapies followed by surgery over exclusive RT-CHT with the former treatment option leading to significantly more morbidity and mortality. Although several studies attempted to identify patient subgroups favoring induction therapies followed by surgery, they have invariably been retrospective in nature, and their results have never been reproduced even in other retrospective setting. Furthermore, no PRCT investigated potential pretreatment patient and/or tumor-related predictors of surgical multimodality success. Exclusive RT-CHT achieves similar results to induction therapies followed by surgery but with less morbidity and mortality. This is accompanied with the finding that no pretreatment predictor exists to enable identification of even a subgroup of stage IIIA/pN2 patients benefiting from any surgical approach.

The Optimal Treatment for Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. We aimed to address this important issue through a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We performed a search of electronic databases for randomized controlled trials comparing the following treatments: surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and their multiple combinations before March 25, 2018. Pooled data on overall survival and treatment-related deaths were analyzed within the Bayesian framework.

RESULTS

Eighteen eligible trials reporting 13 treatments were included. In terms of overall survival, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, which tended to be consistent (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.21 to 5.93), ranked superior to other treatments. Notably, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy was significantly more effective in prolonging survival than surgery alone (HR 0.38, 95% CrI 0.18 to 0.81), surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.51, 95% CrI 0.29 to 0.92) and potentially surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.49, 95% CrI 0.23 to 1.05). Overall, with 29% as the highest possibility of causing the fewest treatment-related deaths, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy was the safest treatment option.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy has the greatest possibility to be the optimal treatment with the best overall survival and fewest treatment-related deaths for stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC.

Early tumor shrinkage served as a prognostic factor for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death. About 80% of patients are diagnosed at stage III in the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is extremely important to understand the progression of this disease which has low survival times despite the advancing treatment modalities. We aimed to investigate the relationship between early tumor shrinkage (ETS) after initial concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT) and survival outcome in patients with stage III (NSCLC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of 103 patients with stage III NSCLC who had received C-CRT from January 2006 to October 2011 was performed. Patients were treated with systemic chemotherapy regimen of Cisplatin/Vp-16 and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy at a median dose of 66 Gy (range 60-70 Gy). All patients received a computed tomography (CT) examination before treatment. Also subsequently, chest CT scans were performed with the same imaging parameters at approximately 5 weeks after the initiation of treatment. ETS is here stratified by a decrease in tumor size ≥30% and <30% in the longest dimension of the target lesion within 5 weeks.

RESULTS

Of the 103 patients, 59 ones showed a 30% decrease in tumor size, and the rest displayed a decrease of <30%. ETS showed no significant correlation with age, T classification, N classification, histological classification, smoking status, G classification, EGFR status, or acute pulmonary toxicity. In the current retrospective clinical study, Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients with ETS ≥ 30% had a better progression-free survival and overall survival. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that ETS < 30% was associated with a significantly increased risk of cancer-related death (P < .05) in stage IIINSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

ETS may be served as a useful prognostic factor to predict the outcome of stage III NSCLC patients treated with CCRT.

Pneumonectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths and its incidence continues to increase. Emerging therapies as part of a multimodal approach are making more patients eligible for surgical resection. As more surgeons are treating locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer they find themselves recommending pneumonectomy as the surgical component of the multidisciplinary plan. Performing a pneumonectomy is technically demanding and is associated with many potential perioperative comorbidities. With the proper preparation, experience, and attention to perioperative care, pneumonectomy can be carried out safely with excellent outcomes and a good quality of life.

Prognosis of multi-level N2-positive non-small cell lung cancer according to lymph node staging using endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial biopsy

Background

The optimal treatment for stage IIIA‐N2 non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial, and multidisciplinary team approaches are needed. Downstaging after induction therapy is a good prognostic factor in surgical patients; however, re‐evaluation of nodal status before surgery is challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of patients with multi‐level N2 NSCLC who received surgery or chemoradiation therapy (CRT) according to restaging using endobronchial ultrasound‐transbronchial aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA).

Methods

This was a single center, prospective study that included 16 patients with biopsy‐proven multi‐level N2 disease on initial EBUS‐TBNA that was restaged using EBUS‐TBNA after induction therapy. Cases downstaged after rebiopsy were treated surgically. Three‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) and locoregional PFS were determined using Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results

Of the 16 patients (median age 58 years, male 63%), eight had persistent N2 disease and eight showed N2 clearance on restaging using EBUS‐TBNA. Ten patients underwent surgery, including two patients without N2 clearance. Recurrence and locoregional recurrence occurred in eight and five patients, respectively. The three‐year PFS was longer in patients with N2 clearance than in those with N2 persistent disease (57.1% vs. 37.5%). Patients with N2 clearance also had longer three‐year locoregional PFS than those with N2 persistent disease (71.4% vs. 62.5%).

Conclusions

EBUS‐TBNA could be an effective diagnostic method for restaging in multi‐level N2 NSCLC patients after induction CRT. As this was a pilot study, further large‐scale randomized studies are needed.

Induction chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy for potentially resectable stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85% to 90% of lung cancer cases. At diagnosis, around 30% of NSCLC patients are already at stage IIIA (N2). One standard treatment for this stage is induction chemotherapy followed by surgery, whether induction chemoradiotherapy is superior to induction chemotherapy remains uncertain. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized control trials to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of induction chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy for potentially resectable stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC.

Methods

We systematically searched for relevant studies in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from the inception of each database to September 10, 2017. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), pathological complete response (pCR) rate of mediastinal lymph nodes, toxicity (grade 3-4 adverse events, i.e., nausea and vomiting, infections, leukopenia and anemia), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager v5.3.

Results

Four studies, containing 461 patients in total, were included for meta-analysis. Our analyses suggest that compared with induction chemotherapy, induction chemoradiotherapy improved ORR [odds ratio (OR) =1.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-3.10, P<0.05] and pCR rate of mediastinal lymph nodes (OR =1.97, 95% CI: 1.00-3.86, P=0.05); but it did not significantly improve OS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.91, 95% CI: 0.73-1.14, P=0.42] or PFS (HR =1.01, 95% CI: 0.81-1.26, P=0.91); also it did not exacerbate the toxicity.

Conclusions

Induction chemoradiotherapy may have limited value concerning tumor response and pCR of mediastinal lymph nodes. However, current evidence does not support that addition of radiotherapy to induction chemotherapy followed by surgery can bring significant benefits to operable stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC patients. More studies are required to draw a better conclusion.

Combining antiangiogenic therapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases treatment efficacy in stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer without increasing adverse effects

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining Endostar antiangiogenic therapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC, we conducted a randomized, controlled, open-label clinical study of 30 NSCLC patients. Patients were randomly assigned to the test or control groups, which received either two cycles of an NP neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen combined with Endostar or the NP regimen alone, respectively, at a 2:1 ratio. Efficacy was assessed after 3 weeks, and surgical resection occurred within 4 weeks, in the 26 patients who successfully completed treatment. While total response rates (RR) and clinical benefit rates (CBR) did not differ between the experimental groups, total tumor regression rates (TRR) were higher in the test group than in the control group. Median DFS and OS also did not differ between the test and control groups. Clinical perioperative indicators, including intraoperative blood loss, number of dissected lymph node groups, duration of postoperative indwelling catheter use, and time to postoperative discharge, were comparable in the test and control groups. Finally, hematological and non-hematological toxicities and postoperative pathological indicators, including down-staging ratio, complete resection ratio, and metastatic lymph node ratio, also did not differ between the groups. Overall, combining Endostar with NP neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased therapeutic efficacy without increasing adverse effects in stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT02497118).

Development of single nanometer-sized ultrafine oxygen bubbles to overcome the hypoxia-induced resistance to radiation therapy via the suppression of hypoxia-inducible factor‑1α

Radiation therapy can result in severe side-effects, including the development of radiation resistance. The aim of this study was to validate the use of oxygen nanobubble water to overcome resistance to radiation in cancer cell lines via the suppression of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α (HIF-1α) subunit. Oxygen nanobubble water was created using a newly developed method to produce nanobubbles in the single-nanometer range with the ΣPM-5 device. The size and concentration of the oxygen nanobubbles in the water was examined using a cryo-transmission electron microscope. The nanobubble size was ranged from 2 to 3 nm, and the concentration of the nanobubbles was calculated at 2×10¹⁸ particles/ml. Cell viability and HIF-1α levels were evaluated in EBC-1 lung cancer and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells treated with or without the nanobubble water and radiation under normoxic and hypoxic conditions in vitro. The cancer cells grown in oxygen nanobubble-containing media exhibited a clear suppression of hypoxia-induced HIF-1α expression compared to the cells grown in media made with distilled water. Under hypoxic conditions, the EBC-1 and MDA-MB231 cells displayed resistance to radiation compared to the cells cultured under normoxic cells. The use of oxygen nanobubble medium significantly suppressed the hypoxia-induced resistance to radiation compared to the use of normal medium at 2, 6, 10 and 14 Gy doses. Importantly, the use of nanobubble media did not affect the viability and radiation sensitivity of the cancer cell lines, or the non-cancerous cell line, BEAS-2B, under normoxic conditions. This newly created single-nanometer range oxygen nanobubble water, without any additives, may thus prove to be a promising agent which may be used to overcome the hypoxia-induced resistance of cancer cells to radiation via the suppression of HIF-1α.

Surgical Management of Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

According to the eighth edition of the tumor–node–metastasis classification, stage III non-small cell lung cancer is subdivided into stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC. They represent a heterogeneous group of bronchogenic carcinomas with locoregional involvement by extension of the primary tumor and/or ipsilateral or contralateral lymph node involvement. Surgical indications have not been definitely established but, in general, long-term survival is only obtained in those patients in whom a complete resection is obtained. This mini-review mainly focusses on stage IIIA disease comprising patients with locoregionally advanced lung cancers. Different subcategories of N2 involvement exist, which range from unexpected N2 disease after thorough preoperative staging or “surprise” N2, to bulky N2 involvement, mostly treated by chemoradiation, and finally, the intermediate category of potentially resectable N2 disease treated with a combined modality regimen. After induction therapy for preoperative N2 involvement, best surgical results are obtained with proven mediastinal downstaging when a lobectomy is feasible to obtain a microscopic complete resection. However, no definite, universally accepted guidelines exist. A relatively new entity is salvage surgery applied for recurrent disease after full-dose chemoradiation when no other therapeutic options exist. Equally, only a small subset of patients with T4N0-1 disease qualify for surgical resection after thorough discussion within a multidisciplinary tumor board on the condition that a complete resection is feasible. Targeted therapies and immunotherapy have recently become part of our therapeutic armamentarium, and it might be expected that they will be incorporated in current regimens after careful evaluation in randomized clinical trials.

Resectable Clinical N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; What Is the Optimal Treatment Strategy? An Update by the British Thoracic Society Lung Cancer Specialist Advisory Group

Patients and clinicians are faced with uncertainty as to the optimal treatment strategy for potentially resectable NSCLC in which there is clinical evidence of involvement of the ipsilateral mediastinum. Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have failed to demonstrate superiority of one bimodality strategy over another (chemotherapy plus surgery versus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy). One trial of trimodality treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery demonstrated an improvement in progression-free, but not overall, survival versus chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There are a number of limitations to the data in this complex and heterogenous patient group. No randomized controlled trial has specifically studied patients with single-station N2 disease versus multistation N2 disease. When discussing treatment for fit patients with potentially resectable cN2 NSCLC, lung cancer teams should consider trimodality treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery or bimodality treatment with chemotherapy and either surgery or radiotherapy. We advocate that all patients see both a thoracic surgeon and the oncology team to discuss these different approaches.

Combined modality therapy in Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: clarity or confusion despite the highest level of evidence?

Recent years have witnessed a number of clinical trials in Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comparing (A) induction chemotherapy (CHT) with induction CHT and radiotherapy (RT), each followed by surgery; (B) either induction CHT or induction RT-CHT, each followed by surgery, with definitive RT-CHT (no surgery). Due to the heterogeneity of patient, tumor and treatment characteristics across these trials, various meta-analyses (MAs) have been performed to define the optimal treatment approach in this setting for this clinical presentation. Six such MAs exist. In spite of the differences between MAs, it appears that RT does not add extra benefit to induction CHT administered before surgery, and that a trimodality (i.e. including surgery) regimen is not superior to definitive concurrent RT-CHT. While one can consider both induction CHT followed by surgery and exclusive concurrent RT-CHT as feasible in this setting, lack of pre-treatment predictive factors identifying patients who might preferentially benefit from a surgical approach limits its use to well-planned clinical trials.

Variations in positron emission tomography-computed tomography findings for patients receiving neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to predict locoregional lymph node (LN) metastases using positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and investigate variations in PET-CT findings for patients receiving neoadjuvant (NT) and non-neoadjuvant (non-NT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Data from 578 consecutive patients from January 2010 to December 2015 who met this study inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent curative and complete resections for NSCLC in a Korean hospital. We analyzed the associations between maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and pathological stage, compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), investigated relationships among SUVmax values, evaluated LN status and compared pathologically negative and positive LNs by SUVmax, and assessed the influence of neoadjuvant therapy on SUVmax. All LNs were analyzed separately for N1 and N2.

RESULTS

(I) For non-NT, we found significantly positive associations between pathological stage and SUVmax (tumor, N1 LN, and N2 LN, all P<0.001). For NT, we found positive correlations between pathological stage and tumor and N2 LN SUVmax, except for N1 LN (tumor P=0.005, N1 LN P=0.981, N2 LN P=0.045); (II) for non-NT, the low SUVmax group had higher DFS and OS than the high SUVmax group (DFS: tumor SUVmax P<0.001, N1 LN SUVmax P=0.002, N2 LN SUVmax P=0.027; OS: tumor SUVmax P<0.001, N1 LN SUVmax P=0.006, N2 LN SUVmax P=0.006). For NT, the low SUVmax group had nonsignificantly higher DFS and OS than the high SUVmax group. When age, sex, and SUVmax were equal, pathological stages were significantly higher for NT than non-NT (P<0.001). Non-NT had significantly higher DFS (P=0.001) and OS (P=0.024) than NT; (III) for non-NT, tumor, N1 LN, and N2 SUVmax were positively associated (all P<0.001). For NT, tumor and N2 SUVmax (P<0.001), and N1 and N2 SUVmax (P=0.025) correlated positively; tumor and N1 LN SUVmax did not (P=0.911); (IV) for non-NT, there was significant cutoff values for prediction of LN metastases using both tumor and LN SUVmax (N1 LN: tumor SUVmax cutoff 5.95, sensitivity 66.3%, specificity 66.0%, area =0.748, P<0.001; N1 LN SUVmax cutoff 2.05, sensitivity 57.83%, specificity 66.43%, area =0.676, P<0.001) (N2 LN: tumor SUVmax cutoff 5.95, sensitivity 63.04%, specificity 63.95%, area =0.726, P<0.001; N2 LN SUVmax cutoff 2.05, sensitivity 65.22%, specificity 69.96%, area =0.678, P<0.001). For NT, no SUVmax values significantly predicted LN metastases; () Pathologically malignant and benign LN SUVmax after neoadjuvant therapy were not different (N1 LN P=0.570, N2 LN P=0.105). For non-NT, pathologically malignant LN SUVmax was significantly higher than pathologically benign LN SUVmax (N1 LN P<0.001, N2 LN P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed variations in PET-CT findings for NT and non-NT, which should be verified for evaluation and management, especially for surgery planning. SUV max is not a reliable predictor of lymphatic involvement after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with NSCLC. Surgery should not be withheld or delayed based on lack of knowledge about variations in PET-CT findings, which must be interpreted in conjunction with other conditions. Further studies on interpretation of PET-CT findings, especially for NT, are needed for better management and prognosis.

Optimum treatment for mediastinal lymph node positive (N2) resectable non-small cell lung cancer: what is the role for surgery?

INTRODUCTION

A third of patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) present with Stage III disease with mediastinal (N2) nodal involvement representing an extremely heterogeneous population with a generally poor prognosis. Areas covered: This article describes the complexity of Stage III-N2 patients reviewing the outcomes of key clinical trials while highlighting the trial designs and subtleties that have created controversy in management. Both bimodality approaches combining chemotherapy with either surgery or radiation and trimodality approaches combining chemotherapy with both local therapies are reviewed. Finally, prognostic factors and future directions are explored for the management of this population. Expert commentary: Upfront surgery is not recommended for patients with Stage III-N2 NSCLC. Neoadjuvant approaches with both chemotherapy and chemoradiation are acceptable in a multidisciplinary setting if appropriate surgery is performed by a dedicated thoracic surgeon. Non-operative candidates should receive definitive concurrent chemoradiation. Innovative approaches are necessary to improve outcomes in this population.

Concomitant etoposide and cisplatin provided improved survival compared with docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

Presently, there is no consensus regarding which chemotherapy regimen is best to administer with radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Herein, our aim was to compare the outcome of patients treated with either etoposide-cisplatin (EP) or docetaxel-cisplatin (DP) in this curative setting.Patients treated with either EP or DP and concurrent radiotherapy from 2004 to2012 were identified and their detailed medical records and follow-up information were obtained for analysis in this retrospective study. Survival rates were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression models with adjustments for confounding parameters provided by propensity score methods.A total of 105 patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for LA-NSCLC (stage IIB-IIIA-IIIB). The median ages were 54 years (range, 32-70 years) and 55 years (range, 37-73 years) in the EP (n = 50) and DP (n = 55) groups, respectively. The median follow-up time was 27 months (range, 1-132 months) in the EP group and 19 months (range, 1-96 months) in DP group. There was no significant difference in baseline clinicopathologic features including age, sex, performance status, histologic subtype, and clinical TNM stages between groups. In the univariate analysis, the median overall survival of patients treated with EP was higher than that of patients treated with DP (41 vs. 20 months, P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis further revealed a survival advantage with EP compared with DP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.83; P = 0.009). The toxicity profile of the 2treatment groups was similar except that pulmonary toxicity was higher in the DP group (grade 3-4: 0% vs. 6%, P = 0.024).Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with EP may provide more favorable outcomes than DP and with an acceptable safety profile.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy followed by surgery is superior to that followed by definitive chemoradiation or radiotherapy in stage IIIA (N2) nonsmall-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis and system review

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30% of all cases of nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are of a locally advanced (IIIA or IIIB) stage. However, surgical therapy for patients with stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC is associated with a disappointing 5-year survival rate. The optimal treatment for stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC is still in dispute.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases (last search updated in March 2015), and a meta-analysis of the available data was conducted. Two authors independently extracted data from each eligible study.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies, including five randomized controlled trials and four retrospective studies, were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Significant homogeneity (χ (2)=49.62, P=0.000, I (2)=81.9%) was detected between four of the studies, including a total of 11,948 selected cases. Among the nine studies that investigated overall survival, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) was 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.87; P=0.000). Subgroup analyses were performed according to the study design and the extent of resection. We observed a statistically significant better outcome after lobectomy (pooled HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.47-0.58; P=0.000) than after pneumonectomy (pooled HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69-0.98; P=0.028). Unfortunately, there was no significant difference between the randomized controlled studies, as the pooled HR was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.81-1.09; P=0.440).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy followed by surgery (particularly lobectomy) is superior to following these therapies with definitive chemoradiation or radiotherapy, particularly in patients undergoing lobectomy.