An updated systematic review of the evolution of ALPPS and evaluation of its advantages and disadvantages in accordance with current evidence

Promising Results of Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma in a Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

ALPPS popularity is increasing among surgeons worldwide and its indications are expanding to cure patients with primarily unresectable liver tumors. Few reports recommended limitations or even contraindications of ALPPS in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (phCC). Here, we discuss the results of ALPPS in patients with phCC in a systematic review as well as a pooled data analysis.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for relevant literature up to December 2023. All studies reporting ALPPS in the management of phCC were included. A single-arm meta-analysis of proportions was carried out to estimate the overall rate of outcomes.

RESULTS

After obtaining 207 articles from the primary search, data of 18 studies containing 112 phCC patients were included in our systematic review. Rates of major morbidity and mortality were calculated to be 43% and 22%, respectively. The meta-analysis revealed a PHLF rate of 23%. One-year disease-free survival was 65% and one-year overall survival was 69%.

CONCLUSIONS

ALPPS provides a good chance of cure for patients with phCC in comparison to alternative treatment options, but at the expense of debatable morbidity and mortality. With refinement of the surgical technique and better perioperative patient management, the results of ALPPS in patients with phCC were improved.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma

These guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) were commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology liver section. The guideline writing committee included a multidisciplinary team of experts from various specialties involved in the management of CCA, as well as patient/public representatives from AMMF (the Cholangiocarcinoma Charity) and PSC Support. Quality of evidence is presented using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) format. The recommendations arising are to be used as guidance rather than as a strict protocol-based reference, as the management of patients with CCA is often complex and always requires individual patient-centred considerations.

Surgical management in hepatoblastoma: points to take

Hepatoblastoma is the most common primary malignant paediatric liver tumour and surgery remains the cornerstone of its management. The aim of this article is to present the principles of surgical treatment of hepatoblastoma. All aspects of surgery in hepatoblastoma are discussed, from biopsy, through conventional and laparoscopic liver resections, to extreme resection with adjacent structures, staged hepatectomy and transplantation.

Efficacy of Technical Modifications to the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To compare the outcomes of modified-Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) techniques with those of conventional-ALPPS.

Background

ALPPS is an established technique for treating advanced liver tumors.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched. The outcomes were assessed by single-arm and 2-arm analyses.

Results

Seventeen studies containing 335 modified-ALPPS patients were included in single-arm meta-analysis. The estimated blood loss was 267 ± 29 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 210-324 mL) during the first and 662 ± 51 mL (95% CI, 562-762 mL) during the second stage. The operation time was 166 ± 18 minutes (95% CI, 131-202 minutes) during the first and 225 ± 19 minutes (95% CI, 188-263 minutes) during the second stage. The major morbidity rate was 14% (95% CI, 9%-22%) after the first stage. The future liver remnant hypertrophy rate was 65.2% ± 5% (95% CI, 55%-75%) and the interstage interval was 16 ± 1 days (95% CI, 14-17 days). The dropout rate was 9% (95% CI, 5%-15%). The overall complication rate was 46% (95% CI, 37%-56%) and the major complication rate was 20% (95% CI, 14%-26%). The postoperative mortality rate was 7% (95% CI, 4%-11%). Seven studies containing 215 patients were included in comparative analysis. The hypertrophy rate was not different between 2 methods (mean difference [MD], -5.01; 95% CI, -19.16 to 9.14; P = 0.49). The interstage interval was shorter for partial-ALPPS (MD, 9.43; 95% CI, 3.29-15.58; P = 0.003). The overall complication rate (odds ratio [OR], 10.10; 95% CI, 2.11-48.35; P = 0.004) and mortality rate (OR, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.36-10.26; P = 0.01) were higher in the conventional-ALPPS.

Conclusions

The hypertrophy rate in partial-ALPPS was similar to conventional-ALPPS. This shows that minimizing the first stage of the operation does not affect hypertrophy. Moreover, the postoperative overall morbidity and mortality rates were lower following partial-ALPPS.

Long-term survival after CCRT and HAIC followed by ALPPS for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion: a case report

There are various methods for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion, such as systemic chemotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. These methods have similar clinical efficacy but are designed with a palliative aim. Herein, we report a case that experienced complete remission through "associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS)" after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy. In this patient, concurrent chemoradiotherapy and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy induced substantial tumor shrinkage, and hypertrophy of the nontumor liver was sufficiently induced by portal vein ligation (stage 1 surgery) followed by curative resection (stage 2 surgery). Using this approach, long-term survival with no evidence of recurrence was achieved at 16 months. Therefore, the optimal use of ALPPS requires sufficient consideration in cases of significant hepatocellular carcinoma shrinkage for curative purposes.

Role of CT in Two-Stage Liver Surgery

Complete resection is the only potentially curative treatment for primary or metastatic liver tumors. Improvements in surgical techniques such as conventional two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) with portal vein embolization and ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) promote hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR), expanding resection criteria to include patients with widespread hepatic disease who were formerly not considered candidates for resection. Radiologists are essential in the multidisciplinary approach required for TSH. In particular, multidetector CT has a critical role throughout the various stages of this surgical process. The aims of CT before the first stage of TSH are to define the feasibility of surgery, assess the number and location of liver tumors in relation to relevant anatomy, and provide a detailed anatomic evaluation, including vascular and biliary variants. Volume calculation with CT is also essential to determine if the FLR is sufficient to avoid posthepatectomy liver failure. The objectives of CT between the first and second stages of TSH are to recalculate liver volumes (ie, assess FLR hypertrophy) and depict expected liver changes and complications that could modify the surgical plan or preclude the second stage of definitive resection. In this review, the importance of CT throughout different stages of TSH is discussed and key observations that contribute to surgical planning are highlighted. In addition, the advantages and limitations of MRI for detection of liver metastases and assessment of complications are briefly described. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Microwave ablation of colorectal liver metastases: Impact of a 10-mm safety margin on local recurrence in a tertiary care hospital

Microwave ablation (MWA) for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) has been traditionally considered inferior to surgery due to the higher rate of local recurrence. The study investigated whether a safety margin of 10 mm can improve local control in patients undergoing surgical MWA. Surgical MWA was used to treat 53 lesions in 22 patients with CLM at our Institution from June 2012 to June 2017. The patients’ mean age was 64.5 years, and the median size of the lesion was 16.5 mm (9–34 mm). MWA was associated with liver resection in 16 patients (72.7%). The median follow-up was 32.4 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with tumor recurrence. Median ablation area was 36.6 mm² (30–50 mm²). The complication rate was 22.7%. No local recurrence was observed during follow-up. Disease-free survival was 20 months (4.8–55.2 months). Univariate analysis revealed that the number of liver metastases and node-positive primary tumors were associated with tumor recurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed that node-positive primary tumor was the only factor significantly associated with tumor recurrence (p = 0.049; odds ratio, 12; 95% confidence interval, 1–143). When performed with a 10-mm safety margin, surgical MWA can lead to acceptable oncological outcomes with low morbidity. Therefore, it represents a good option in selected patients with CLM.

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in colorectal liver metastases: review of the literature

The liver is considered as one of the most common sites of metastasis and a key determining factor of survival in patients with isolated colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). For longer survival of patients, surgical resection is the only available option. Especially in CRLM bilobar patients, to achieve R0 resection, maintaining an adequate volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) is the main technical challenge to avoid post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). As standard procedures in the treatment of patients with severe metastatic liver disease, techniques such as portal vein embolization/portal vein ligation (PVE/PVL) accompanied by two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) have been introduced. These methods, however, have drawbacks depending on the severity of the disease and the capacity of the patient to expand the liver remnant. Eventually, implementation of the novel ALPPS technique ignited excitement among the community of hepatobiliary surgeons because ALPPS challenged the idea of unrespectability and extended the limit of liver surgery and it was reported that FLR hypertrophy of up to 80% was induced in a shorter time than PVL or PVE. Nonetheless, ALPPS techniques caused serious concerns due to the associated high morbidity and mortality levels of up to 40% and 15% respectively, and PHLF and bile leak are critical morbidity- and mortality-related factors. Carefully establishing the associated risk factors of ALPPS has opened up a new dimension in the field of ALPPS technique for improved surgical outcome by carefully choosing patients. The benefit of ALPPS technique is enhanced when performed for young patients with very borderline remnant volume. Adopting ALPPS technical modifications such as middle hepatic vein preservation, surgical management of the hepatoduodenal ligament, the anterior approach and partial ALPPS may lead to the improvement of ALPPS surgical performance. Research findings to validate the translatability of ALPPS’ theoretical advantages into real survival benefits are scarce.

Uncommon indications for associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy: a systematic review

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) represents an innovative surgical technique used for the treatment of large hepatic lesions at high risk for post-resection liver failure due to a small future liver remnant. The most significant amount of literature concerns the use of ALPPS for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCC), and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). On the opposite, few is known about the role of ALPPS for the treatment of uncommon liver pathologies. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the current literature on this topic. A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible articles published up to February 2020 were included using the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Among the 486 articles screened, 45 papers met the inclusion criteria, with 136 described cases of ALPPS for rare indications. These 136 cases were reported in 18 different countries. Only in two countries, namely Germany and Brazil, more than ten cases were observed. As for the ALPPS indications, we reported 41 (30.1%) cases of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) metastases, followed by 27 (19.9%) cases of gallbladder cancer (GBC), nine (6.6%) pediatric cases, six (4.4%) gastrointestinal stromal tumors, six (4.4%) adult cases of benign primary liver disease, four (2.9%) adult cases of malignant primary liver disease, and 43 (31.6%) adult cases of malignant secondary liver disease. According to the International ALPPS Registry data, less than 10% of the ALPPS procedures have been performed for the treatment of uncommon liver pathologies. NET and GBC are the unique pathologies with acceptable numerosity. ALPPS for NET appears to be a safe procedure, with satisfactory long-term results. On the opposite, the results observed for the treatment of GBC are poor. However, these data should be considered with caution. The rationale for treating benign pathologies with ALPPS appears to be weak. No definitive response should be given for all the other pathologies. Multicenter studies are needed with the intent to clarify the potentially beneficial effect of ALPPS for their treatment.

Liver Resection After Selective Internal Radiation Therapy with Yttrium-90: Safety and Outcomes

Introduction

Selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) with yttrium-90 (Y-90) is an intra-arterial therapy for hepatic malignancy in patients who are unsuitable for surgical resection. This treatment is considered palliative, although some patients can demonstrate a response that is adequate to facilitate surgical resection with curative intent.

Methods

All patients who underwent liver resection post SIRT were reviewed. Data gathered included patient demographics, tumor type, surgical details, and post-operative outcomes.

Results

Twelve patients underwent SIRT followed by liver resection (7 males and 5 females). Pathologies were hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 5), metastatic colorectal cancer (n = 5), and neuroendocrine tumor (n = 2). Lesional response (size, volume, and RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors)) was calculated and where appropriate functional liver remnant (FLR) is presented. Mean FLR increase was 264cm³ (range − 123 to 909), and all cases demonstrated a partial response according to RECIST with a mean largest lesion volume reduction of 475cm³ (range 14–1632). No post-SIRT complications were noted. Hepatectomy occurred at a mean of 322 days from SIRT treatment. Ninety-day morbidity was 67% (n = 6), complications post-surgery were analyzed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification scale; a total of 15 events occurred in 6 patients. Ninety-day mortality of 11% (n = 1).

Conclusion

In selected cases, liver resection is possible post SIRT. As this can represent a potentially curative option, it is important to reconsider resection in the follow-up of patients undergoing SIRT. Post-operative complications are noted following major and extended liver resection. Therefore, further studies are needed to improve patient selection.

A minimally invasive first stage of ALPPS for hepatoblastoma in a child

Large and giant tumors, especially hepatoblastomas, are more frequently presented in pediatric patients. At about two-third of hepatoblastomas at the time of diagnosis are unresectable and liver transplantation is considered as a treatment of choice because of insufficient future liver remnant volume. In selected cases, 2-staged hepatectomy may be the unique chance for curative resection except hepatectomy followed by liver replacement. Despite the overwhelming spread of minimally invasive liver surgery, the laparoscopic approach remains uncommon in children. A case of successful partial associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy firstly accomplished pure laparoscopically on the first stage in an infant is presented. Described experience suggests both: the feasibility of laparoscopic procedures and the effectiveness of partial in situ liver splitting to reach appropriate future liver remnant volume and to avoid liver transplantation and its disadvantages.

Current status of associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy: Comparison with two-stage hepatectomy and strategies for better outcomes

Since its introduction in 2012, associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has significantly expanded the pool of candidates for liver resection. It offers patients with insufficient liver function a chance of a cure. ALPPS is most controversial when its high morbidity and mortality is concerned. Operative mortality is usually a result of post-hepatectomy liver failure and can be minimized with careful patient selection. Elderly patients have limited reserve for tolerating the demanding operation. Patients with colorectal liver metastasis have normal liver and are ideal candidates. ALPPS for cholangiocarcinoma is technically challenging and associated with fair outcomes. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma have chronic liver disease and limited parenchymal hypertrophy. However, in selected patients with limited hepatic fibrosis satisfactory outcomes have been produced. During the inter-stage period, serum bilirubin and creatinine level and presence of surgical complication predict mortality after stage II. Kinetic growth rate and hepatobiliary scintigraphy also guide the decision whether to postpone or omit stage II surgery. The outcomes of ALPPS have been improved by a combination of technical modifications. In patients with challenging anatomy, partial ALPPS potentially reduces morbidity, but remnant hypertrophy may compare unfavorably to a complete split. When compared to conventional two-stage hepatectomy with portal vein embolization or portal vein ligation, ALPPS offers a higher resection rate for colorectal liver metastasis without increased morbidity or mortality. While ALPPS has obvious theoretical oncological advantages over two-stage hepatectomy, the long-term outcomes are yet to be determined.

Selective occlusion of the hepatic artery and portal vein improves liver hypertrophy for staged hepatectomy

Background

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of selective occlusion of the hepatic artery and portal vein (SOAP) for staged hepatectomy (SOAPS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

Methods

From December 2014 to August 2018, 9 patients with unresectable HCC were chosen to undergo SOAPS. SOAP without liver partition was performed in the first stage. The second stage was performed when future liver remnant (FLR) was equal to or bigger than 40% of the standard liver volume (SLV). The growth rate of FLR, perioperative outcomes, and survival data was recorded.

Results

In the first stage, all the 9 patients completed SOAP. Two cases received radiological interventional method and 7 cases received open operation. None of them developed liver failure and died following SOAP. After SOAP, FLR increased 145.0 ml (115.0 to 210 ml) and 37.1% (25.6 to 51.7%) on average. The average time interval between the two stages was 14.1 days (8 to 18 days). In the second stage, no in-hospital deaths occurred after SOAPS. One patient suffered from liver failure after SOAPS, and artificial liver support was adopted and his total bilirubin level returned to normal after postoperative day 35. The alpha-fetoprotein level of 8 patients reduced to normal within 2 months after SOAPS. Among 9 patients, 5 patients survived, 4 patients died of intrahepatic recurrence, lung metastasis, or bone metastasis. In the 5 survived cases, bone metastasis and intrahepatic recurrence were found in 1 patient, intrahepatic recurrence was found in another patient, and the remaining 3 patients were free of recurrence. The median disease-free survival time and overall survival time were 10.4 and 13.9 months, respectively.

Conclusion

SOAP can facilitate rapid and sustained FLR hypertrophy, and SOAPS is safe and effective in patients with unresectable HCC.

Combined hepatic and portal vein embolization as preparation for major hepatectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Some patients remain deemed unsuitable for resection after portal vein embolization (PVE) because of insufficient hypertrophy of the future remnant liver (FRL). Hepatic and portal vein embolization (HPVE) has been shown to induce hypertrophy of the FRL. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review of the available literature on HPVE as preparation for major hepatectomy.

METHODS

The literature search was performed on online databases. Studies including patients who underwent preoperative HPVE were retrieved for evaluation.

RESULTS

Six articles including 68 patients were published between 2003 and 2017. HPVE was performed successfully in all patients with no mortality and morbidity-related procedures. The degree of hypertrophy of the FRL after HPVE ranged from 33% to 63.3%. Surgical resection after preoperative HPVE could be performed in 85.3% of patients, but 14.7% remained unsuitable for resection because of insufficient hypertrophy of the FRL or tumor progression. Posthepatectomy morbidity and mortality rates were 10.3% and 5.1%, respectively. The postoperative liver failure rate was nil.

CONCLUSION

HPVE as a preparation for major hepatectomy appears to be feasible and safe and could increase the resectability of patients initially deemed unsuitable for resection because of absent or insufficient hypertrophy of the FRL after PVE alone.

Experience of associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy as first published case report in Saudi Arabia

This case is the first published associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy procedure done successfully in Saudi Arabia, with excellent hypertrophic response to the liver remnant. This is a milestone in liver resection techniques in the country and the region.

Y90 Radioembolization Dosimetry: Concepts for the Interventional Radiologist

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with beta particle emitting microspheres via Yttrium-90 decay has become a fundamental component of the contemporary Interventional Oncology practice. TARE continues to advance as a result of increased utilization, clinical study, technological improvements, and evolving applications. To maximize TARE safety and efficacy, a core understanding of dosimetry is essential. The intent of this overview is to provide the reader with a general survey of radiation physics and biology, device differentiation, patient selection, anatomic assessment, activity administration models, and procedural techniques involved with TARE dosimetry.

Role of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation in staged hepatectomy (ALPPS)-strategy for colorectal liver metastases

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. The liver is the most frequent site of metastasis and a key determinant of survival in patients with isolated colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Surgical resection remains the only hope for prolonged survival in patients with CRLM. However, most patients are deemed to be unresectable at presentation due to a small future liver remnant (FLR) and fear of post-hepatectomy liver failure. Procedures such as portal vein ligation or embolization (PVL/PVE) followed by hepatectomy have been established as standard methods to increase FLR volume, but have limitations dependent upon extent of disease and patient's ability to grow the liver remnant. Recently, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation in staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been introduced as a technique to induce liver hypertrophy over a shorter time period. Being a complex two-stage surgical procedure, initial reports of higher ALPPS-associated complications and mortality limited its worldwide adoption by hepatobiliary surgeons. However, recent studies have showed ALPPS superiority over conventional procedures in terms of feasibility and inducing liver hypertrophy, with comparable morbidity and mortality. We herein review the role of ALPPS in management of patients with CRLM.

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation versus 2-stage hepatectomy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing associating liver partition and portal vein ligation (ALPPS) with conventional 2-stage hepatectomy (TSH) in terms of clinical outcomes and to determine the feasibility and safety of ALPPS.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy was adopted to search the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and China Biology Medicine disc databases for studies comparing ALPPS and TSH. The search was broadened by looking up the reference lists of the retrieved articles. A meta-analysis was performed using the statistical software RevMan (v 5.3; Cochrane Collaboration).

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies involving 561 patients (ALPPS group, 136 patients; TSH group, 425 patients) were included in the present study, all of which were observational studies. Compared with TSH, ALPPS was associated with high completion rates of both stages [odds ratio (OR): 10.68, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 3.26-34.97, P < .0001]. No significant differences were found in other outcomes such as complications of the first (OR: 4.04, 95% CI: 0.81-20.27, P = .09) and second surgical stage (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 0.71-3.57, P = .26), liver failure (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.29-1.98, P = .58) and the 90-day mortality rate (OR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.00-4.84, P = .05).

CONCLUSION

ALPPS is associated with lower noncompletion rate and had similar perioperative outcomes relative to TSH. However, only retrospective observational studies were included in this meta-analysis, which may have limited the strength of the evidence. High-quality, large-scale studies are required to further evaluate the outcomes of ALPPS.

Role of Kupffer cells in the progression of CRC liver metastases after the first stage of ALPPS

Associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been suggested as a potential therapy for extensive bilobar liver tumors, although in some circumstances this technique may induce tumor progression, a fact still not well studied. Our aim was to study tumor hepatic progression induced by the first step of ALPPS in a WAG/Rij rat syngenic model of metastatic colorectal carcinoma by subcapsular CC531 cell line inoculation. ALPPS induced: tumor progression on deportalized lobe and metastases; expression of hepatic vasculogenic factors (HIF1-α and VEGF); and a dramatic increase of Kupffer cells (KCs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Interestingly, KCs expressed COX-2 (M1 polarization), while TAMs expressed mainly arginase-1 (M2 polarization). ALPPS also induced a decrease of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and an increase of intrahepatic T lymphocytes. Thus, ALPPS technique seems to induce a hypoxic environment, which enhances hepatic HIF1-α and VEGF expression and may promote KCs and TAMs polarization. Consequently, the regenerative stimulus seems to be driven by a pro-inflammatory and hypoxic environment, in which M1 intrahepatic macrophages expressing COX-2 and T-Lymphocytes play a key role, facts which may be related with the tumor progression observed.

First Ever Robotic Stage One ALPPS Procedure in India: for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Twenty five percent of total liver volume (TLV) is considered as the ideal functional liver remnant (FLR) in major liver resections. In patients with macro-vesicular steatosis, early cirrhosis, and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), hepatocellular injury is common. In such instances, up to 40% of FLR may be required. So in cases of marginal FLR, pre-operative portal vein (PV) embolization or two-stage hepatectomy with PV occlusion is used. Both of which take up to 14 weeks between stages and 30% of patients fail to reach the second resection either due to inadequate FLR growth or disease progression. Associated liver partition and portal vein ligation (ALPPS) procedure has become the gold standard for those cases. A 57-year-old male presented with rectosigmoid growth + multiple right liver and segment 4B metastases. Post-NACT MRI showed interval progression of lesions. Preoperative CT (computed tomography) volumetric scan showed a FLR/TLV (future liver remnant/total liver volume) of 22%. Since patient received 10 cycles of NACT, ALPPS procedure was planned ahead of direct liver resection. Robotic ALPPS stage 1 sparing left lateral segment and 4A + anterior resection was done. We transected the parenchyma between the FLR and the diseased part of the liver with concomitant right portal vein ligation done robotically. CT abdomen done on POD7 showed hypertrophied left lateral segment. Second stage was performed on the eighth post-operative day with FLR/TLV increasing to 37%. Robotic ALPPS procedure for stage one is a safe and feasible technique in experienced centers with advanced robotic skills.

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy versus conventional two-stage hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

It is generally accepted that an insufficient future liver remnant is a major limitation of large-scale hepatectomy for patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Conventional two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) is commonly considered to accelerate future liver regeneration despite its low regeneration rate. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), which is characterized by a rapid regeneration, has brought new opportunities.

Methods

Relevant studies were identified by searching the selected databases up to September 2017. Then, a meta-analysis of regeneration efficiency, complication rate, R0 resection ratio, and short-term outcomes was performed.

Results

Ten studies, comprising 719 patients, were included. The overall analysis showed that ALPPS was associated with a larger hyperplastic volume and a shorter time interval (P < 0.00001) than TSH. ALPPS also exhibited a higher completion rate for second-stage operations (odds ratio, OR 9.50; P < 0.0001) and a slightly higher rate of R0 resection (OR 1.90; P = 0.11). Interestingly, there was no significant difference in 90-day mortality between the two treatments (OR 1.44; P = 0.35).

Conclusions

These results indicate that compared with TSH, ALPPS possesses a stronger regenerative ability and better facilitates second-stage operations. However, the safety, patient outcomes, and patient selection for ALPPS require further study.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12957-017-1295-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Safety and Feasibility of Three-Dimensional Visualization Technology Assisted Right Posterior Lobe Allied with Part of V and VIII Sectionectomy for Right Hepatic Malignancy Therapy

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy is the optimal method for liver cancer; the virtual liver resection based on three-dimensional visualization technology (3-DVT) could provide better preoperative strategy for surgeon. We aim to introduce right posterior lobe allied with part of V and VIII sectionectomy assisted by 3-DVT as a promising treatment for massive or multiple right hepatic malignancies to retain maximum residual liver volume on the basis of R0 resection.

METHODS

Among 126 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy, 9 (7%) underwent right posterior lobe allied with part of V and VIII sectionectomy. 21 (17%) underwent right hemihepatectomy (RH). The virtual RH was performed with 3-DVT, which provided better observation of spatial position relationship between tumor and vessels, and the more accurate estimation of the remnant liver volume. If remnant liver volume was <40%, right posterior lobe allied with part of V and VIII sectionectomy should be undergone. Then, the precut line ought to be planned on the basis of protecting the portal branch of subsegment 5 and 8. The postoperative outcome of patients was compared before and after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Nine patients meeting the eligibility criteria received right posterior lobe allied with part of V and VIII sectionectomy. The variables, including the overall mean operation time, blood transfusion, operation length, liver function, and postoperative complications, were similar between two groups before and after propensity matching. The postoperative first, third, fifth, and seventh days mean value of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin (ALB), and total bilirubin had no significant difference compared with preoperative value. One patient in each group had recurrence six months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Right posterior lobe allied with part of V and VIII sectionectomy based on 3-DVT is safe and feasible surgery way, and can be a very promising method in massive or multiple right hepatic malignancy therapy.

Experimental evaluation of liver regeneration patterns and liver function following ALPPS

Background

The underlying mechanism of liver regeneration after Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation (PVL) for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between future liver remnant (FLR) volume, liver regeneration characteristics and restoration of function in an experimental model of ALPPS.

Methods

An ALPPS model in rats was developed with selective PVL, parenchymal transection and partial hepatectomy (step 1), followed by resection of the liver (step 2). Three different ALPPS groups with FLR sizes of 30, 20 and 10 per cent of total liver volume were compared with sham‐operated controls and animals undergoing resection of left lateral lobe and 90 per cent PVL with respect to morbidity, mortality, liver regeneration and function.

Results

Three of 15 animals that had ALPPS with 10 per cent FLR (ALPPS10) died after step 1. Ascites developed in two of five rats that had ALPPS with 20 per cent FLR and in three of four animals in the ALPPS10 group after step 2. Although the relative increments in FLR size and growth rates were highest in the ALPPS groups, small FLR size was associated with a sustained increase in levels of serum aminotransferases and bilirubin, a lower albumin concentration, severe sinusoidal injury, increased expression of proliferation markers and increased activation of hepatic progenitor cells after step 2.

Conclusion

There is discordance between FLR volume increase and functional restoration after the ALPPS procedure.

Rescue associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy after portal embolization: Our experience and literature review

AIM

To report a single-center experience in rescue associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), after failure of previous portal embolization. We also performed a literature review.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2015, every patient who underwent a rescue ALPPS procedure in Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, France, was included. Every patient included had a project of major hepatectomy and a previous portal vein embolization (PVE) with insufficient future liver remnant to body weight ratio after the procedure. The ALPPS procedure was performed in two steps (ALPPS-1 and ALPPS-2), separated by an interval phase. ALPPS-2 was done within 7 to 9 d after ALPPS-1. To estimate the FLR, a computed tomography scan examination was performed 3 to 6 wk after the PVE procedure and 6 to 8 d after ALPPS-1. A transcystic stent was placed during ALPPS-1 and remained opened during the interval phase, in order to avoid biliary complications. Postoperative liver failure was defined using the 50-50 criteria. Postoperative complications were assessed according to the Dindo-Clavien Classification.

RESULTS

From January 2014 to December 2015, 7 patients underwent a rescue ALPPS procedure. Median FLR before PVE, ALPPS-1 and ALPPS-2 were respectively 263 cc (221-380), 450 cc (372-506), and 660 cc (575-776). Median FLR/BWR before PVE, ALPPS-1 and ALPPS-2 were respectively 0.4% (0.3-0.5), 0.6% (0.5-0.8), and 1% (0.8-1.2). Median volume growth of FLR was 69% (18-92) after PVE, and 45% (36-82) after ALPPS-1. The combination of PVE and ALPPS induced a growth of median initial FLR of +408 cc (254-513), leading to an increase of +149% (68-199). After ALPPS-2, 4 patients had stage I-II complications. Three patients had more severe complications (one stage III, one stage IV and one death due to bowel perforation). Two patients suffered from postoperative liver failure according to the 50/50 criteria. None of our patients developed any biliary complication during the ALPPS procedure.

CONCLUSION

Rescue ALPPS may be an alternative after unsuccessful PVE and could allow previously unresectable patients to reach surgery. Biliary drainage seems to reduce biliary complications.

Totally laparoscopic associating liver tourniquet and portal vein occlusion for staged hepatectomy combined with simultaneous left hemicolectomy for bilateral liver metastases of the primary colon cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

Resection of the liver is often limited to the insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). To address this problem, the modification surgical technique "associating liver tourniquet and portal vein occlusion for staged hepatectomy" (ALTPS) was developed and led to quick hypertrophy in a short interval. In some colorectal cancer patients with multiple and bilobar metastases, the resection of the primary is often protracted immensely to the unpredictable postoperative complications for whom is to be treated with a liver-first approach. To overcome this problem, a simultaneous resection of the primary tumor and totally laparoscopic ALTPS for bilateral liver metastases of the primary colon cancer were performed.

CASE SUMMARY

A 63-year-old female patient with left colon cancer and synchronous bilateral colorectal liver metastases underwent a totally laparoscopic ALTPS and simultaneous left hemicolectomy because of the small FLR. The operative times were 460 minutes for the first stage and 240 minutes for the second stage without the need for blood transfusions. The recoveries after the first and the second operations were uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 11 of the second stage operation.

CONCLUSION

Our case shows the totally laparoscopic ALTPS and simultaneous left hemicolectomy at step 1 for bilobar liver metastases of the primary colon cancer with no severe postoperative complications. If a resection of the primary tumor does not compromise the split procedure, the combination of pure laparoscopic ALTPS and primary resection is feasible and safe.

First Left Hepatic Trisectionectomy Including Segment One with New Associated Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation with Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Modification: How To Do It?

BACKGROUND Associated Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation with Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) leads to rapid hepatic hypertrophy and decreases incidence of post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with a marginal future liver remnant. Various procedural ALPPS modifications were previously described. Here, we present the first case of a new ALPPS modification, carrying out a left hepatic trisectionectomy with segment 1. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 36-year-old woman with locally advanced sigmoid adeno-carcinoma and extensive left liver metastases extending to segment V and VIII, who received state-of-the-art systemic conversion chemotherapy. Preoperative CT volumetric scan demonstrated a FLR/TLV (Future Liver Remnant/Total Liver Volume) of 22%. A left hepatic trisectionectomy procedure was conducted using our new ALPPS modification. Sufficient hepatic hypertrophy of FLR was reached with a volume increase of 100%. The period between the 2 stages was 7 days. The patient underwent left trisectionectomy and left colectomy with tumor-free margins. All dissected lymph nodes were tumor-negative. The surgical intra- and postoperative course was uneventful. Medically, the patient acquired an Acinetobacter infection, with severe sepsis and acute renal injury. After 3 dialysis sessions, the renal function recovered completely. Afterwards, the patient recovered slowly, and reintroduction ambulation and oral feeding was prolonged. Later on, the patient received Xeloda 1500 mg twice daily as adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The new ALPPS modification leads to a sufficient hypertrophy of FRL within 1 week, allowing left hepatic trisectionectomy with tumor-free FRL. Despite the challenging complications, the new ALPPS modification might represent an alternative procedure for use when the classic ALPPS procedure is not applicable. Further studies are required.

Erratum: Medicine, Volume 95, Issue 24: Erratum

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003291.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003731.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003791.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003805.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003827.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003863.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003878.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003879.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003884.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003900.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003513.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003631.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003644.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003692.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003701.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003706.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003712.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003767.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003781.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003808.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003831.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003837.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003839.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003842.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003843.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003847.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003848.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003850.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003861.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003862.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003864.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003866.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003871.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003872.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003880.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003878.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003873.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003876.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003879.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003881.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003884.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003885.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003888.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003889.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003891.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003893.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003894.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003897.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003899.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003900.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003901.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003902.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003903.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003904.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003908.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003910.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003912.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003916.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003917.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003918.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003920.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003921.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003923.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003924.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003925.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003934.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003941.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003944.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003970.].