The outcome and prognostic factors of 248 elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with standard-dose or low-intensity induction therapy

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Korean Patients With AML Ineligible for First-Line Intensive Chemotherapy: A Subanalysis of the CURRENT Study, a Non-Interventional, Retrospective Chart Review

BACKGROUND

Although most elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (ICT), treatment options remain limited. CURRENT (UMIN000037786), a real-world, non-interventional, retrospective chart review, evaluated clinical outcomes, clinicopathologic characteristics, and treatment patterns in these patients. We present results from a subanalysis of Korean patients in this study.

METHODS

Patients were aged ≥ 18 years with primary or secondary AML ineligible for ICT who initiated first-line systemic therapy or best supportive care (BSC) between 2015 and 2018 across four centers in Korea. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from diagnosis. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure, and response rates. Data analyses were primarily descriptive, with time-to-event outcomes estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression used to determine prognostic factors for survival.

RESULTS

Among 194 patients enrolled, 84.0% received systemic therapy and 16.0% received BSC. Median age at diagnosis was 74 and 78 years, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1 was reported in 73.0% and 48.4% of patients, respectively; poor cytogenetic risk was reported in 30.1% and 16.1% of patients. Median OS was 7.83 vs. 4.50 months, and median PFS was 6.73 vs. 4.50 months in the systemic therapy vs. BSC groups. Prognostic factors affecting OS included secondary AML (hazard ratio, 1.67 [95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.45]), ECOG performance status ≥ 2 (2.41 [1.51-3.83]), poor cytogenetic risk (2.10 [1.36-3.24]), and Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 1 (2.26 [1.43-3.58]).

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcomes are poor in Korean patients with AML ineligible for ICT who are prescribed current systemic therapies or BSC. There is a substantial unmet need for novel agents (monotherapy or in combination) to improve clinical outcomes in this patient population.

Prognosis of older patients with newly diagnosed AML undergoing antileukemic therapy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The prognostic value of age and other non-hematological factors in predicting outcomes in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing antileukemic therapy is not well understood. We performed a systematic review to determine the association between these factors and mortality and health-related quality of life or fatigue among these patients.

METHODS

We searched Medline and Embase through October 2021 for studies in which researchers quantified the relationship between age, comorbidities, frailty, performance status, or functional status; and mortality and health-related quality of life or fatigue in older patients with AML receiving antileukemic therapy. We assessed the risk of bias of the included studies using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool, conducted random-effects meta-analyses, and assessed the quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

We included 90 studies. Meta-analysis showed that age (per 5-year increase, HR 1.16 95% CI 1.11-1.21, high-quality evidence), comorbidities (Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index: 3+ VS less than 3, HR 1.60 95% CI 1.31-1.95, high-quality evidence), and performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/ World Health Organization (ECOG/WHO): 2+ VS less than 2, HR 1.63 95% CI 1.43-1.86, high-quality evidence; ECOG/WHO: 3+ VS less than 3, HR 2.00 95% CI 1.52-2.63, moderate-quality evidence) were associated with long-term mortality. These studies provided inconsistent and non-informative results on short-term mortality (within 90 days) and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

High-quality or moderate-quality evidence support that age, comorbidities, performance status predicts the long-term prognosis of older patients with AML undergoing antileukemic treatment.

Hypomethylating agents combined with low-dose chemotherapy for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy: a real-world clinical experience

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based regimens in the treatment of older adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), unfit for standard induction chemotherapy. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of 140 older adult patients with AML who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy and were treated with HMA-based therapies were retrospectively analysed. The median age of the group was 70 years, and poor-risk cytogenetics and secondary/treatment-related AML (s/t-AML) accounted for 45.6% and 34.3% of these patients, respectively. The overall response rate was 48.6%, and 40.1% for patients who achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery. The median overall survival (OS) was 10.4 months, and the 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates were 42.6%, 19.9%, and 4.9%, respectively. Early mortality accounted for 4.3% of all cases, and infection occurred in 87.1% of all patients during induction therapy. Patients who received HMA and low-dose chemotherapy presented with significantly superior response and long-term survival rates compared to those who received HMA alone. They also showed comparable outcomes to those treated with the azacitidine plus venetoclax protocol. Low-dose chemotherapy in combination with decitabine or azacitidine showed a similar response rate and prognosis. Age ≥ 75years and a white blood cell (WBC) count ≥ 10 × 109 cells/L were identified as independent adverse prognostic factors for OS, while poor-risk cytogenetics, percentage of bone marrow blasts, and s/tAML had no significant impact on OS when patients were treated with HMA-based regimens. In conclusion, HMA combined with low-dose chemotherapy was effective and safe in older adults with AML who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy, and no difference was observed between decitabine and azacitidine.

Incidence and socioeconomic factors in older adults with acute myeloid leukaemia: Real-world outcomes from a population-based cohort

OBJECTIVES

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a disease of older adults, who are vulnerable to socio-economic factors. We determined AML incidence in older adults and the impact of socio-economic factors on outcomes.

METHODS

We included 3024 AML patients (1996-2016) identified from a population-based registry.

RESULTS

AML incidence in patients ≥60 years increased from 11.01 (2001-2005) to 12.76 (2011-2016) per 100 000 population. Among 879 patients ≥60 years in recent eras (2010-2016), rural residents (<100 000 population) were less likely to be assessed by a leukaemia specialist (39% rural, 47% urban, p = .032); no difference was seen for lower (43%, quintile 1-3) vs. higher (47%, quintile 4-5) incomes (p = .235). Similar numbers received induction chemotherapy between residence (16% rural, 18% urban, p = .578) and incomes (17% lower, 17% high, p = 1.0). Differences between incomes were seen for hypomethylating agent treatment (14% low, 20% high, p = .041); this was not seen for residence (13% rural, 18% urban, p = .092). Among non-adverse karyotype patients ≥70 years, 2-year overall survival was worse for rural (5% rural, 12% urban, p = .006) and lower income (6% low, 15% high, p = .017) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

AML incidence in older adults is increasing, and outcomes are worse for older rural and low-income residents; these patients face treatment barriers.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with AML in Japan who were ineligible for first-line intensive chemotherapy

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) predominantly affects elderly adults, and its prognosis worsens with age. Treatment options for patients in Japan ineligible for intensive chemotherapy include cytarabine/aclarubicin ± granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CA ± G), azacitidine (AZA), low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), targeted therapy, and best supportive care (BSC). The country's aging population and the evolving treatment landscape are contributing to a need to understand treatment pathways and associated outcomes. This retrospective chart review evaluated outcomes in patients across Japan with primary/secondary AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy and began first-line treatment or BSC between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2018. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and healthcare resource utilization (HRU). Of 199 patients (58% > 75 years), 121 received systemic therapy (38 CA ± G, 37 AZA, 7 LDAC, 39 other) and 78 received BSC. Median OS was 5.4, 9.2, 2.2, 3.8, and 2.2 months for CA ± G, AZA, LDAC, other systemic therapy, and BSC, respectively; median PFS was 3.4, 7.7, 1.6, 2.3, and 2.1 months, respectively. HRU rates were uniformly high, with > 80% patients hospitalized in each cohort. The poor clinical outcomes and high HRU among Japanese AML patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy highlight an unmet need for novel therapies.

Efficacy of non-intensive therapies approved for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic literature review

Aim: De novo relapsed and/or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (rrAML) has limited treatment options for patients not eligible ('unfit') to receive intensive chemotherapy-based interventions. The authors aimed to summarize outcomes for licensed therapies in this setting. Materials & methods: A systematic literature review identified licensed therapies in this setting. A feasibility assessment was made to conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate comparative efficacy. Results: Seven unique trials were identified. Median survival months were 13.8 for gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), 9.3 for gilteritinib (FLT3 mutated rrAML), 5.6 for low-dose cytarabine and 3.2 for best supportive care; transplant rates with gilteritinib and GO were 25.5% and 19%, respectively. A network meta-analysis was not feasible. Conclusion: There remains a high unmet need in de novo rrAML patients not eligible for intensive therapy, with GO and gilteritinib (only FLT3 mutated AML) providing the best current options.

Predictive factors associated with induction-related death in acute myeloid leukemia in a resource-constrained setting

Despite advances in supportive measures, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remission induction still has a high mortality rate in real-world studies as compared to prospective reports. We analyzed data from 206 AML adult patients treated with conventional chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the 60-day mortality rate, aiming to find risk factors and to examine the role of anti-infection prophylaxis. The 60-day mortality rate was 26%, raising to 41% among those older than 60 years. Complete response was documented at the end of induction in 49%. The final survival model showed that age > 60 years (HR 3.2), Gram-negative colonization (HR 3), monocytic AML (HR 1.8), C-reactive protein (CRP) > 15 mg/dL (HR 10), and an adverse risk in the genetic stratification (HR 3) were associated with induction death. Multidrug-resistant bacteria colonization, thrombosis, and AKI were documented in 71%, 12%, and 66% of the cohort, respectively. Antibacterial and antifungal prophylaxis did not improve outcomes in this study. Our report corroborated the higher mortality during AML induction compared to real-world data from the USA and Europe. In line with other publications, age and cytogenetic stratification influenced early death in this cohort. Noticeably, Gram-negative colonization, monocytic AML, and CRP were also significant to early mortality.

A systematic literature review of disease burden and clinical efficacy for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rapidly progressive hematological malignancy that is difficult to cure. The prognosis is poor and treatment options are limited in case of relapse. A comprehensive assessment of current disease burden and the clinical efficacy of non-intensive therapies in this population are lacking. We conducted two systematic literature reviews (SLRs). The first SLR (disease burden) included observational studies reporting the incidence and economic and humanistic burden of relapsed/refractory (RR) AML. The second SLR (clinical efficacy) included clinical trials (phase II or later) reporting remission rates (complete remission [CR] or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi]) and median overall survival (mOS) in patients with RR AML or patients with de novo AML who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. For both SLRs, MEDLINE®/Embase® were searched from January 1, 2008 to January 31, 2020. Clinical trial registries were also searched for the clinical efficacy SLR. After screening, two independent reviewers determined the eligibility for inclusion in the SLRs based on full-text articles. The disease burden SLR identified 130 observational studies. The median cumulative incidence of relapse was 29.4% after stem cell transplant and 46.8% after induction chemotherapy. Total per-patient-per-month costs were $28,148-$29,322; costs and health care resource use were typically higher for RR versus non-RR patients. Patients with RR AML had worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores than patients with de novo AML across multiple instruments, and lower health utility values versus other AML health states (i.e. newly diagnosed, remission, consolidation, and maintenance therapy). The clinical efficacy SLR identified 50 trials (66 total trial arms). CR/CRi rates and mOS have remained relatively stable and low over the last 2 decades. Across all arms, the median rate of CR/CRi was 18.3% and mOS was 6.2 months. In conclusion, a substantial proportion of patients with AML will develop RR AML, which is associated with significant humanistic and economic burden. Existing treatments offer limited efficacy, highlighting the need for more effective non-intensive treatment options.

Real-world treatment patterns and healthcare resource use in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in Western Europe

Aim: Assess treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in patients with treatment-naive (TN) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in Europe. Patients & methods: Cross-sectional, retrospective, web-based survey of AML-treating healthcare professionals (HCPs) in 12 European countries. Results: 320 HCPs provided information on 1280 TN or R/R patients. Patients ineligible versus eligible for intensive induction therapy required more general practitioner visits (4.1 vs 2.4), more uses of healthcare-related transport (6.9 vs 4.5), but less hospitalization (11.4 vs 27.5 days). Differences were observed in HRU and treatment patterns across countries. Conclusions: This analysis of 'real-world' patients with TN or R/R AML in Europe demonstrates substantial healthcare use, including higher use of resources in patients ineligible for intensive induction therapy.

[Venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine for patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: results from the Chinese cohort of a phase three randomized placebo-controlled trial]

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in Chinese patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are unable to tolerate intensive induction chemotherapy. Methods: Adults ≥ 18 years with newly diagnosed AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were enrolled in this international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Globally, patients (n=211) were randomized 2∶1 to either venetoclax with LDAC or placebo with LDAC in 28-d cycles, with LDAC on days 1-10. The primary endpoint was OS; the secondary endpoints included response rates, event-free survival, and adverse events. Results: A total of 15 Chinese patients were enrolled (venetoclax arm, n=9; placebo arm, n=6) . The median age was 72 years (range, 61-86) . For the primary analysis, the venetoclax arm provided a 38% reduction in death risk compared with the placebo[hazard ratio (HR) , 0.62 (95%CI 0.12-3.07) ]. An unplanned analysis with an additional 6 months of follow-up demonstrated a median OS of 9.0 months for venetoclax compared with 4.1 months for placebo. The complete remission (CR) rates with CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) were 3/9 (33%) and 0/6 (0%) , respectively. The most common non-hematologic adverse effects (venetoclax vs placebo) were hypokalemia[5/9 (56%) vs 4/6 (67%) ], vomiting[4/9 (44%) vs 3/6 (50%) ], constipation[2/9 (22%) vs 4/6 (67%) ], and hypoalbuminemia[1/9 (11%) vs 4/6 (67%) ]. Conclusion: Venetoclax with LDAC demonstrated meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in Chinese patients consistent with the observations from the global VIALE-C population, making it an important treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed AML who are otherwise ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

Intensive versus less-intensive antileukemic therapy in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review

To compare the effectiveness and safety of intensive antileukemic therapy to less-intensive therapy in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and intermediate or adverse cytogenetics, we searched the literature in Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL to identify relevant studies through July 2020. We reported the pooled hazard ratios (HRs), risk ratios (RRs), mean difference (MD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects meta-analyses and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Two randomized trials enrolling 529 patients and 23 observational studies enrolling 7296 patients proved eligible. The most common intensive interventions included cytarabine-based intensive chemotherapy, combination of cytarabine and anthracycline, or daunorubicin/idarubicin, and cytarabine plus idarubicin. The most common less-intensive therapies included low-dose cytarabine alone, or combined with clofarabine, azacitidine, and hypomethylating agent-based chemotherapy. Low certainty evidence suggests that patients who receive intensive versus less-intensive therapy may experience longer survival (HR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.99), a higher probability of receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (RR 6.14; 95% CI, 4.03-9.35), fewer episodes of pneumonia (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.06-0.98), but a greater number of severe, treatment-emergent adverse events (RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.03-1.75), and a longer duration of intensive care unit hospitalization (MD, 6.84 days longer; 95% CI, 3.44 days longer to 10.24 days longer, very low certainty evidence). Low certainty evidence due to confounding in observational studies suggest superior overall survival without substantial treatment-emergent adverse effect of intensive antileukemic therapy over less-intensive therapy in older adults with AML who are candidates for intensive antileukemic therapy.

Development and validation of a prognostic model for adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia

Background

The high heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) reflected in the patient- and disease-related factors accounts for the unsatisfactory prognosis despite the introduction of novel therapeutic approaches and drugs in recent years.

Methods

In the development set (n = 412), parameters including age, hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, biallelic CEBPA mutations, DNMT3A mutations, FLT3-ITD/NPM1 status, and ELN cytogenetic risk status were identified as independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. A nomogram combining these predictors for individual risk estimation was established thereby.

Findings

The prognostic model demonstrated promising performance in the development cohort. The calibration plot, C-index (0.74), along with the 1-, 2- and 3-year area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC, 0.76, 0.79, and 0.74, respectively) in the validation set (n = 238) substantiated the robustness of the model. In addition to stratifying young (age ≤ 60 years) and elderly patients (age > 60 years) into three and two risk groups with significant distinct outcomes, the prognostic model succeeded in distinguishing eligible candidates for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Interpretation

The prognostic model is capable of survival prediction, risk stratification and helping with therapeutic decision-making with the use of easily acquired variables in daily clinical routine.

Funding

This work was supported in part by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81770141), the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFE0202800), and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support (20161406).

American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for treating newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in older adults

BACKGROUND

Older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represent a vulnerable population in whom disease-based and clinical risk factors, patient goals, prognosis, and practitioner- and patient-perceived treatment risks and benefits influence treatment recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about management of AML in older adults.

METHODS

ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included specialists in myeloid leukemia, geriatric oncology, patient-reported outcomes and decision-making, frailty, epidemiology, and methodology, as well as patients. The McMaster Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Centre supported the guideline-development process, including performing systematic evidence reviews (up to 24 May 2019). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance to patients, as judged by the panel. The panel used the GRADE approach, including GRADE's Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 6 critical questions in managing older adults with AML, mirroring real-time practitioner-patient conversations: the decision to pursue antileukemic treatment vs best supportive management, the intensity of therapy, the role and duration of postremission therapy, combination vs monotherapy for induction and beyond, duration of less-intensive therapy, and the role of transfusion support for patients no longer receiving antileukemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment is recommended over best supportive management. More-intensive therapy is recommended over less-intensive therapy when deemed tolerable. However, these recommendations are guided by the principle that throughout a patient's disease course, optimal care involves ongoing discussions between clinicians and patients, continuously addressing goals of care and the relative risk-benefit balance of treatment.

Prediction of bleeding and thrombosis by standard biochemical coagulation variables in haematological intensive care patients

PURPOSE

We assessed the value of standard biochemical coagulation parameters in predicting bleeding, thrombosis and mortality in adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients with haematological malignancies.

METHODS

We screened all patients with acute leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome admitted to a university hospital ICU during 2008-2012. Data were obtained from the clinical chemistry laboratory database and patient files. We graded bleeding according to the World Health Organisation (WHO)-system within 24-h, within 5-days and during the whole ICU stay. We analysed the predictive values of laboratory parameters using multiple logistic regression and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves. As we previously have established that platelet count at admission was associated with bleeding, we focused on International Normalised Ratio (INR), activated pro-thrombin time (APTT), anti-thrombin, D-dimer and fibrinogen, and markers of infection (C-reactive protein, pro-calcitonin), kidney function (creatinine) and tissue damage (lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)).

RESULTS

We included 116 patients; 66 (57%) had at least one bleeding episode and 11 (9%) patients had at least one thrombotic event. The differences in coagulation values when bleeding compared to baseline values were minor. INR was the only variable we found associated with subsequent bleeding within 24 h from admission to ICU (odds ratio 2.91, 95% CI: 1.01-8.43, P = 0.048). ROC analyses did not show predictive value of any of the other variables with regards to bleeding and none of the variables were associated with thrombosis in adjusted analyses. Increased levels of LDH at admission were associated with increased 7-day and 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased INR at admission was associated with a higher rate of bleeding in ICU patients with haematological malignancies. No other biochemical coagulation or other parameter had any association with bleeding, thrombosis or mortality except increased LDH, which at ICU admission was associated with increased 30-day mortality.

Impact of marital status during diagnosis on cancer-caused specific survival in acute myeloid leukemia patients: a case-control and population-based study

Objective

This study investigated the impact of marital status on cancer-caused specific mortality among acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients in the United States.

Methods

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program to identify 50,825 patients who had their clinical and follow-up information available and were diagnosed for AML between the years 1988 and 2015. The univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyze the patient data, and to minimize the group differences due to covariates between groups, a 1:1 propensity score matching was used in subsequent subgroup analysis.

Results

Our study demonstrated that married patients were less likely to die due to AML after adjusting for demographic and clinicopathological variables, than patients with variable unmarried status. Further analysis indicated that widowed, divorced and never married status correlated with poor cancer-cause specific survival than being married in almost all subgroups after being adjusted for the aforementioned variables (P<0.05). However, the difference between married and separated was not apparent. Moreover, similar survival analysis results were also observed in the 1:1 matched subgroups of marital status, but they displayed varied prognostic factors between them. The association of survival benefit with marriage in AML was consistent with the published survival benefit of conventional therapeutic approaches.

Conclusion

Overall, our study concluded that unmarried AML patients were at greater risk of cancer-specific mortality than married, and thus indicated that physicians should focus on health care strategies that target social support, in order to reduce the cancer-specific mortality in unmarried patients.