Steroid-sparing effect and toxicity of dapsone treatment in giant cell arteritis: A single-center, retrospective study of 70 patients

Clinical and laboratory findings characterizing the need for systemic corticosteroids and nonsteroidal systemic therapies and the predicted outcomes in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa: a single-centre retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa (cPN) is a necrotizing arteritis of medium-sized vessels limited to the skin. Because of its rarity and the diversity of its clinical manifestations, there is no consensus treatment. Moreover, there are no established indicators that predict disease severity or its outcome.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate clinicolaboratory features that predict patients requiring systemic therapy, including corticosteroids, to control disease activity.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with cPN who had not received systemic corticosteroids at their initial visit were retrospectively analysed by correlating the treatment and its response with clinicolaboratory findings.

RESULTS

The major medications administered were antiplatelet agents [64% (23/36)], vasodilators [39% (14/36)] and prednisolone (PSL) [36% (13/36)]. In total, 23 patients achieved remission without PSL, 5 were managed with compression therapy alone or even observation and 18 received antiplatelet monotherapy or combined with vasodilator/dapsone whereas 13 required PSL. Of the 13 who required PSL, 10 achieved remission with PSL monotherapy or PSL and single/multiple medications and 3 with PSL and multiple drugs then failed to achieve remission and underwent limb amputation. There were more skin ulcers and an elevated peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) before corticosteroid induction in patients requiring PSL. Three patients with treatment failure had a markedly elevated ESR (> 50 mm h-1).

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of patients with cPN can achieve remission without corticosteroids. An elevated WBC, an elevated ESR and the presence of skin ulcers predict the need for PSL. A high ESR before corticosteroid induction predicts treatment resistance, even with PSL.

Exploring the anti-inflammatory activity of sulforaphane

Dysregulation of innate immune responses can result in chronic inflammatory conditions. Glucocorticoids, the current frontline therapy, are effective immunosuppressive drugs but come with a trade-off of cumulative and serious side effects. Therefore, alternative drug options with improved safety profiles are urgently needed. Sulforaphane, a phytochemical derived from plants of the brassica family, is a potent inducer of phase II detoxification enzymes via nuclear factor-erythroid factor 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) signaling. Moreover, a growing body of evidence suggests additional diverse anti-inflammatory properties of sulforaphane through interactions with mediators of key signaling pathways and inflammatory cytokines. Multiple studies support a role for sulforaphane as a negative regulator of nuclear factor kappa-light chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) activation and subsequent cytokine release, inflammasome activation and direct regulation of the activity of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Significantly, studies have also highlighted potential steroid-sparing activity for sulforaphane, suggesting that it may have potential as an adjunctive therapy for some inflammatory conditions. This review discusses published research on sulforaphane, including proposed mechanisms of action, and poses questions for future studies that might help progress our understanding of the potential clinical applications of this intriguing molecule.

New-onset giant cell arteritis with lower ESR and CRP level carries a similar ischemic risk to other forms of the disease but has an excellent late prognosis: a case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis (GCA) occasionally presents without acute-phase reaction. In this setting, GCA may be initially overlooked and glucocorticoid treatment unduly delayed, potentially increasing ischemic risk.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From an inception cohort of patients with newly diagnosed, biopsy-verified GCA, we retrieved all cases without elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) level before starting glucocorticoid treatment. We compared the baseline features and outcomes of these patients and two additional patients recruited after GCA diagnosis with those of 42 randomly selected patients with high baseline ESR and CRP.

RESULTS

Of 396 patients, 14 (3.5%) had lower baseline values of both ESR and CRP. Lower baseline ESR and CRP were associated with fewer American College of Rheumatology criteria met (p < 0.001, 95% CI - 1.1; - 0.9), and less jaw claudication (p = 0.06, 95% CI 0.8; 44.9), but similar rates of permanent blindness (p = 1.0). Patients with lower ESR and CRP also showed obvious differences regarding mean blood cell counts and mean hemoglobin level, but also less anti-cardiolipin antibody positivity (p = 0.04, 95% CI 0.8; ^∞) and hepatic cholestasis (p = 0.03, 95% CI 1.0; 422). Patients with lower ESR and CRP had fewer GCA relapses (p = 0.03, 95% CI - 1.1; - 0.1), fewer glucocorticoid-induced complications (p = 0.01, 95% CI - 2.0; - 0.1), and successfully stopped glucocorticoids sooner than the other patients (18.3 months vs 34 months in average, p = 0.02, 95% CI - 27;- 0.9).

CONCLUSION

Biopsy-proven GCA presenting with lower ESR and CRP is not an exceptional occurrence. It is clinically less typical but carries similar ischemic risk to other forms of the disease. Conversely, the late GCA prognosis of these patients is excellent.

Current developments in the diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis

Giant cell arteritis is the most common vasculitis in adults above 50 years old. The disease is characterized by granulomatous inflammation of medium and large arteries, particularly the temporal artery, and is associated acutely with headache, claudication, and visual disturbances. Diagnosis of the disease is often complicated by its protean presentation and lack of consistently reliable testing. The utility of color doppler ultrasound at the point-of-care and FDG-PET in longitudinal evaluation remain under continued investigation. Novel techniques for risk assessment with Halo scoring and stratification through axillary vessel ultrasound are becoming commonplace. Moreover, the recent introduction of the biologic tocilizumab marks a paradigm shift toward using glucocorticoid-sparing strategies as the primary treatment modality. Notwithstanding these developments, patients continue to have substantial rates of relapse and biologic agents have their own side effect profile. Trials are underway to answer questions about optimal diagnostic modality, regiment choice, and duration.

Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA)

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most frequent primary large-vessel vasculitis in individuals older than 50. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are considered the cornerstone of treatment. GC therapy is usually tapered over months according to clinical symptoms and inflammatory marker levels. Considering the high rate of GC-related adverse events in these older individuals, immunosuppressive treatments and biologic agents have been proposed as add-on therapies. Methotrexate was considered an alternative option, but its clinical impact was limited. Other immunosuppressants failed to demonstrate a significant favourable benefit/risk ratio. The approval of tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor inhibitor brought significant improvement. Indeed, tocilizumab had a noticeable effect on cumulative GCs’ dose and relapse prevention. After the improvement in pathophysiological knowledge, other targeted therapies have been proposed, with anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-17, anti-IL-1, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4, Janus kinase inhibitors or anti-granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor therapies. These therapies are currently under evaluation. Interestingly, mavrilimumab, ustekinumab and, to a lesser extent, abatacept have shown promising results in phase 2 randomised controlled trials. Despite this recent progress, the value, specific condition and optimal application of each treatment remain undecided. In this review, we discuss the scientific rationale for each treatment and the therapeutic strategy.

Advances in the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis among elderly people. The clinical spectrum of the disease is heterogeneous, with a classic/cranial phenotype, and another extracranial or large vessel phenotype as the two more characteristic patterns. Permanent visual loss is the main short-term complication. Glucocorticoids (GC) remain the cornerstone of treatment. However, the percentage of relapses with GC alone is high, and the rate of adverse events affects more than 80% of patients, so it is necessary to have alternative therapeutic options, especially in patients with worse prognostic factors or high comorbidity. MTX is the only DMARD that has shown to reduce the cumulative dose of GC, while tocilizumab is the first biologic agent approved due to its ability to decrease the relapse rate and lower the cumulative GC doses. However, apart from the IL-6 pathway, there are other pro-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors involved in the typical intima hyperplasia and vascular remodeling of GCA. Among them, the more promising targets in GCA treatment are the IL12/IL23 axis antagonists, IL17 inhibitors, modulators of T lymphocytes, and inhibitors of either the JAK/STAT pathway, the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, or the endothelin, all of which are updated in this review.

Large-vessel vasculitis

Large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) manifests as inflammation of the aorta and its major branches and is the most common primary vasculitis in adults. LVV comprises two distinct conditions, giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis, although the phenotypic spectrum of primary LVV is complex. Non-specific symptoms often predominate and so patients with LVV present to a range of health-care providers and settings. Rapid diagnosis, specialist referral and early treatment are key to good patient outcomes. Unfortunately, disease relapse remains common and chronic vascular complications are a source of considerable morbidity. Although accurate monitoring of disease activity is challenging, progress in vascular imaging techniques and the measurement of laboratory biomarkers may facilitate better matching of treatment intensity with disease activity. Further, advances in our understanding of disease pathophysiology have paved the way for novel biologic treatments that target important mediators of disease in both giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis. This work has highlighted the substantial heterogeneity present within LVV and the importance of an individualized therapeutic approach. Future work will focus on understanding the mechanisms of persisting vascular inflammation, which will inform the development of increasingly sophisticated imaging technologies. Together, these will enable better disease prognostication, limit treatment-associated adverse effects, and facilitate targeted development and use of novel therapies.

Research Supporting a Pilot Study of Metronomic Dapsone during Glioblastoma Chemoirradiation

This short note presents previous research data supporting a pilot study of metronomic dapsone during the entire course of glioblastoma treatment. The reviewed data indicate that neutrophils are an integral part of human glioblastoma pathophysiology, contributing to or facilitating glioblastoma growth and treatment resistance. Neutrophils collect within glioblastoma by chemotaxis along several chemokine/cytokine gradients, prominently among which is interleukin-8. Old data from dermatology research has shown that the old and inexpensive generic drug dapsone inhibits neutrophils' chemotaxis along interleukin-8 gradients. It is on that basis that dapsone is used to treat neutrophilic dermatoses, for example, dermatitis herpetiformis, bullous pemphigoid, erlotinib-related rash, and others. The hypothesis of this paper is that dapsone will reduce glioblastomas' neutrophil accumulations by the same mechanisms by which it reduces dermal neutrophil accumulations in the neutrophilic dermatoses. Dapsone would thereby reduce neutrophils' contributions to glioblastoma growth. Dapsone is not an ideal drug, however. It generates methemoglobinemia that occasionally is symptomatic. This generation is reduced by concomitant use of the antacid drug cimetidine. Given the uniform lethality of glioblastoma as of 2020, the risks of dapsone 100 mg twice daily and cimetidine 400 mg twice daily is low enough to warrant a judicious pilot study.

Biologic Therapies for Giant Cell Arteritis

Glucocorticoids have been the mainstay of treatment in giant cell arteritis (GCA) for the past 70 years. Conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) have largely failed to show significant clinical efficacy or reduction of the glucocorticoid burden in GCA. Tocilizumab is the first biologic to make a substantial impact in GCA treatment. With the current understanding of GCA pathogenesis implicating multiple cytokines, notably interleukin (IL) 6, IL-12, IL-23, IL-1β, and the role of janus kinases (JAKs) and the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway in these cytokines, many biologics are currently being investigated in GCA. This review article looks at the existing evidence for biologic agents in GCA. In addition to tocilizumab, the potential role of ustekinumab, abatacept, JAK inhibitors and other promising biologics in GCA are discussed in detail. A treatment algorithm based on the best evidence to date is also presented.

Giant cell arteritis or polymyalgia rheumatica after influenza vaccination: A study of 12 patients and a literature review

INTRODUCTION

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) are inflammatory rheumatic diseases common in people over the age of 50 years. Seasonal influenza vaccination (IV) is strongly recommended in this population, among whom it is considered to be effective and well tolerated. IV-induced GCA or PMR are thought to be exceptional.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrieved all post-IV cases from an inception cohort of patients with newly diagnosed GCA. We also included two patients with post-IV PMR and reviewed all published reports of post-IV GCA or PMR, with selection of cases demonstrating disease onset within 1 month following IV. We compared the results of HLA-DRB1 typing, performed in seven patients with post-IV GCA or PMR, with those of 11 GCA patients with familial aggregation and 16 randomly selected GCA patients without a reported trigger.

RESULTS

Of 358 GCA recruited since 2002, 10 (2.8%) qualified for post-IV GCA, of whom two also showed familial aggregation. Thirty-two patients (19 with GCA and 13 with PMR) including our patients were reviewed; their mean age was 71.8 ± 7.4 years and the M/F ratio was 0.8. Six patients (19%) had a history of PMR. Patients with post-IV GCA/PMR had the DRB1*13:01 haplotype more frequently compared to those with familial GCA (5/7 vs. 2/11, p = 0.048) or with GCA without a known trigger (3/16, p = 0.026). Post-IV PMR generally appeared self-limited, whereas post-IV GCA often displayed a more protracted course (chronic relapsing disease in one-third of the patients).

CONCLUSION

Post-IV onset of GCA/PMR is not an exceptional occurrence and may be part of the spectrum of the autoimmune syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA). IV can trigger GCA or PMR, especially in persons at higher spontaneous risk, such as those with a personal or familial history of GCA/PMR. Whether the presence of the DRB1*13:01 allele further increases the risk of post-IV GCA/PMR through a stronger vaccine-induced immune reaction deserves further investigation. Unlike PMR, GCA can be a serious complication of IV.

Reducing the Toxicity of Long-Term Glucocorticoid Treatment in Large Vessel Vasculitis

Purpose

While glucocorticoids (GCs) are effective in large vessel vasculitis (LVV), they may cause serious adverse events (AEs), especially if taken for longer durations and at higher doses. Unfortunately, patients suffering from LVV often need long-term treatment with GCs; therefore, toxicity needs to be expected and countered.

Recent Findings

GCs remain the mainstay of therapy for both giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis. In order to minimize their toxicity, the following strategies should be considered: GC tapering, administration of conventional synthetic (e.g., methotrexate) or biologic (e.g., tocilizumab) GC-sparing agents, as well as monitoring, prophylaxis, and treatment of GC-related AEs. Several drugs are currently under investigation to expand the armamentarium for the treatment of LVV.

Summary

GC treatment in LVV is effective but associated with toxicity. Strategies to minimize this toxicity should be applied when treating patients suffering from LVV.

Risk profiling for a refractory course of giant cell arteritis: The importance of age and body weight: "Risk profiling for GC resistance in GCA"

BACKGROUND

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a disease that relapses often, and some patients run a refractory course. Although prompt recognition of resistant GCA is a major issue, there is no well-recognized, baseline risk factor for poor response to glucocorticoid (GC) treatment.

METHODS

We included all patients consecutively diagnosed with GCA and homogeneously treated since 1976 in a single department and regularly followed-up for at least 18 months. Using a set of customized criteria defining response to GCs, we separated patients into highly responsive, usually responsive, dependent on GCs, and resistant to GCs. We determined which of the baseline variables were associated with GC-resistance and conducted factor analyses of mixed data and decision tree analyses. We also determined whether being GC-resistant was associated with poorer tolerance to GCs and higher death rates.

RESULTS

In all, 455 patients were followed for 93.4 ± 67.6 (standard deviation) months; 41 (9%) and 21 (4.6%) patients developed GC-dependent and GC-resistant disease, respectively. Factor analyses suggested an association between clinical pattern and degree of responsiveness to GCs; The decision tree analyses, built on an age at GCA onset 〈 66 years and body weight 〉 71 kg, delineated a high risk profile (44% of the patients who featured both characteristics were GC-resistant vs. less than 3% who featured neither, p < 0.001). Infections were more prevalent in the GC-resistant or GC-dependent patients, but without decreasing their survival.

CONCLUSION

Extra-cranial, large-vessel GCA may be associated with prolonged GC requirements. A simple combination of age and body weight defined a subgroup of patients at high risk for developing GC resistance. Our findings need confirmation in prospective controlled studies.

Update on the use of dapsone in dermatology

Dapsone (4,4'-diaminodiphenylsulfone) is the only remaining sulfone used in anthropoid therapeutics and is commercially available as an oral formulation, an inhaled preparation, and a 5% or 7.5% cream. Dapsone has antimicrobial effects stemming from its sulfonamide-like ability to inhibit the synthesis of dihydrofolic acid. It also has anti-inflammatory properties such as inhibiting the production of reactive oxygen species, reducing the effect of eosinophil peroxidase on mast cells and down-regulating neutrophil-mediated inflammatory responses. This allows for its use in the treatment of a wide variety of inflammatory and infectious skin conditions. Currently in dermatology, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications for dapsone are leprosy, dermatitis herpetiformis, and acne vulgaris. However, it proved itself as an adjunctive therapeutic agent to many other skin disorders. In this review, we discuss existing evidence on the mechanisms of action of dapsone, its FDA-approved indications, off-label uses, and side effects.

Systematic literature review informing the 2018 update of the EULAR recommendation for the management of large vessel vasculitis: focus on giant cell arteritis

Objectives

To analyse the current evidence for the management of large vessel vasculitis (LVV) to inform the 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations.

Methods

Two systematic literature reviews (SLRs) dealing with diagnosis/monitoring and treatment strategies for LVV, respectively, were performed. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 31 December 2017. Evidence on imaging was excluded as recently published in dedicated EULAR recommendations. This paper focuses on the data relevant to giant cell arteritis (GCA).

Results

We identified 287 eligible articles (122 studies focused on diagnosis/monitoring, 165 on treatment). The implementation of a fast-track approach to diagnosis significantly lowers the risk of permanent visual loss compared with historical cohorts (level of evidence, LoE 2b). Reliable diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers for GCA are still not available (LoE 3b).The SLR confirms the efficacy of prompt initiation of glucocorticoids (GC). There is no high-quality evidence on the most appropriate starting dose, route of administration, tapering and duration of GC (LoE 4). Patients with GCA are at increased risk of dose-dependent GC-related adverse events (LoE 3b). The addition of methotrexate or tocilizumab reduces relapse rates and GC requirements (LoE 1b). There is no consistent evidence that initiating antiplatelet agents at diagnosis would prevent future ischaemic events (LoE 2a). There is little evidence to guide monitoring of patients with GCA.

Conclusions

Results from two SLRs identified novel evidence on the management of GCA to guide the 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations on the management of LVV.

2018 Update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis

BACKGROUND

Since the publication of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis (LVV) in 2009, several relevant randomised clinical trials and cohort analyses have been published, which have the potential to change clinical care and therefore supporting the need to update the original recommendations.

METHODS

Using EULAR standardised operating procedures for EULAR-endorsed recommendations, the EULAR task force undertook a systematic literature review and sought opinion from 20 experts from 13 countries. We modified existing recommendations and created new recommendations.

RESULTS

Three overarching principles and 10 recommendations were formulated. We recommend that a suspected diagnosis of LVV should be confirmed by imaging or histology. High dose glucocorticoid therapy (40-60 mg/day prednisone-equivalent) should be initiated immediately for induction of remission in active giant cell arteritis (GCA) or Takayasu arteritis (TAK). We recommend adjunctive therapy in selected patients with GCA (refractory or relapsing disease, presence of an increased risk for glucocorticoid-related adverse events or complications) using tocilizumab. Methotrexate may be used as an alternative. Non-biological glucocorticoid-sparing agents should be given in combination with glucocorticoids in all patients with TAK and biological agents may be used in refractory or relapsing patients. We no longer recommend the routine use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy for treatment of LVV unless it is indicated for other reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

We have updated the recommendations for the management of LVV to facilitate the translation of current scientific evidence and expert opinion into better management and improved outcome of patients in clinical practice.

Features and prognosis of giant cell arteritis in patients over 85 years of age: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

We examined the initial features, course, and prognosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) in patients ≥ 85 years of age (≥85 year) and compared them to those of younger patients.

METHODS

The present retrospective study included all patients who were newly diagnosed with GCA in the Internal Departments of two French University Hospitals from 1976 or 1998 to 2017 and who were followed up for at least 6 months. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify baseline and prognostic characteristics associated with being ≥85 year.

RESULTS

Of the 865 patients assessed in this study, 87 were ≥85 year. Compared to younger patients, patients ≥ 85 year had more comorbid conditions (odds ratio [OR] = 1.11-1.74, p < 0.01), less often exhibited polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR; OR = 0.33-0.96, p = 0.04), and more often developed permanent visual loss (OR = 1.29-3.81, p < 0.01). The older patients also showed less dependence on glucocorticoid (GC) medications (OR = 0.23-0.94, p = 0.04), had fewer relapses (OR = 0.31-0.87, p = 0.015), less often recovered from GCA (OR = 0.22-0.69, p < 0.01), and more often died during treatment (OR = 1.45-4.65, p = 0.001) compared to younger patients. Being ≥85 year was the only factor associated with an increased 1-year mortality (hazard ratio = 1.77-5.81, p = 0.0001) for the whole cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

GCA in very elderly patients was characterized by a higher rate of severe ischemic complications and an increased risk for early death compared to younger patients. Thus, there is a need for the early diagnosis of GCA and close clinical monitoring in this unique population.

Current advances in the treatment of giant cell arteritis: the role of biologics

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common form of systemic vasculitis. It is a potentially severe disease with 25% of patients suffering vision loss or stroke. Our treatment paradigm is based on glucocorticoids. Glucocorticoids are required in high doses for prolonged periods and subsequently are associated with a significant amount of treatment-related morbidity. Alternative treatment options are urgently needed to minimize these glucocorticoid adverse events. Many other agents, such as methotrexate and tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors have been used in GCA, with limited or no evidence of benefit. Our emerging understanding of the pathogenic processes involved in GCA has led to an increased interest in the use of biologic agents to treat the disease. Two randomized controlled trials have recently reported dramatic effects of the use of the interleukin-6 targeted biologic tocilizumab in GCA, with significant increases in remission rates and decreases in glucocorticoid burden. While encouraging, longer-term and additional outcomes are awaited to clarify the exact positioning of tocilizumab in the treatment approach. Emerging data for other biologic agents, particularly abatacept and ustekinumab, are also encouraging but less well advanced. We are at the dawn of a new era in GCA treatment, but uncertainties and opportunities abound.

Development of an evidence-based regimen of prednisolone to treat giant cell arteritis - the Norwich regimen

We have reviewed the literature to form a bespoke regimen for daily oral prednisolone (DP) in GCA. Initial DP in clinical trials is 40-60 mg daily, but relapse rates are 67-92%. Cumulative prednisolone (CP) of 3.2 and 3.9 g (at 6 months) resulted in a relapse rate of 83 and 67%, respectively; and 3 and 3.9 g (at 12 months) resulted in 92 and 82% relapse, respectively. CP was 6.2-7.1 g in the first year. Mean DP was 18.8 mg at 3 months and 6.6-7.4 mg at 12 months. The duration of treatment with prednisolone for GCA was 22-26 months. The CP to achieve discontinuation was 6.5-12.1 g. Using these data, the Norwich regimen starts DP at 1 mg/kg/day of lean body mass, discontinuing over 100 weeks. For the average UK woman, initial DP is 45 mg daily, reaching 21 mg daily by 12 weeks and 6 mg daily by 52 weeks. The CP for the average UK woman would be 6.5 g at 52 weeks and 7.4 g to discontinuation.

Current and emerging therapies in large-vessel vasculitis

GCA shares many clinical features with PMR and Takayasu arteritis. The current mainstay of therapy for all three conditions is glucocorticoid therapy. Given the chronic, relapsing nature of these conditions and the morbidity associated with glucocorticoid therapy, there is a need for better treatment options to induce and sustain remission with fewer adverse effects. Conventional immunosuppressive treatments have been studied and have a modest effect. There is a keen interest in biologic therapies with studies showing the efficacy of IL-6 antagonists in PMR and GCA. Recently the first two randomized clinical trials in Takayasu arteritis have been completed. A major challenge for all of these conditions is the lack of standardized measures to assess disease activity. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the impact of biologic therapies showing potential on important clinical outcomes such as vascular damage, cost-effectiveness and quality of life. The optimal duration of treatment also needs to be assessed.

Development of Giant Cell Arteritis after Treating Polymyalgia or Peripheral Arthritis: A Retrospective Case-control Study

Objective.

We investigated the development of giant cell arteritis (GCA) in patients with prior diagnoses of isolated polymyalgia rheumatica and/or peripheral arthritis (PMR/PA), and the potentially relevant characteristics of both illnesses in such patients.

Methods.

We retrospectively compared the features of 67 patients at the onset of PMR/PA, and their outcomes, to those of a random group of 65 patients with PMR/PA who did not develop late GCA. We also compared the features and outcomes of patients with late GCA to those of a random sample of patients with more usual GCA (65 with concurrent PMR/PA and 65 without).

Results.

Patients with late GCA represented 7.4% of all patients with GCA included in a large hospital-based inception cohort. PMR/PA preceded overt GCA by 27 months on average. Permanent visual loss developed in 10 patients, including 8 of 48 (17%) patients featuring cranial arteritis. A questionable female predominance was the only distinguishing feature of PMR/PA evolving into GCA; late GCA more often featured subclinical aortitis (OR 6.42, 95% CI 2.39–17.23; p < 0.001), headache (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.19–1.03; p = 0.06), and fever (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13–0.64; p = 0.002) less often compared to the more usual form of GCA. Patients with either form of GCA experienced similar outcomes.

Conclusion.

A cranial arteritis pattern of late GCA is associated with a significant risk for ischemic blindness. However, compared to the usual form of GCA, late GCA is often less typical, with a higher frequency of silent aortitis. Patients with relapsing/refractory PMR may not be at increased risk for late GCA.

Cloning, expression and identification of KTX-Sp4, a selective Kv1.3 peptidic blocker from Scorpiops pococki

Background

Specific and selective peptidic blockers of Kv1.3 channels can serve as a valuable drug lead for treating T cell-mediated autoimmune diseases, and scorpion venom is an important source of kv1.3 channel inhibitors. Through conducting transcriptomic sequencing for the venom gland of Scorpiops pococki from Xizang province of China, this research aims to discover a novel functional gene encoding peptidic blocker of Kv1.3, and identify its function.

Results

We screened out a new peptide toxin KTX-Sp4 which had 43 amino acids including six cysteine residues. Electrophysiological experiments indicated that recombinant expression products of KTX-Sp4 blocked both endogenous and exogenous Kv1.3 channel concentration-dependently, and exhibited good selectivity on Kv1.3 over Kv1.1, Kv1.2, respectively. Mutation experiments showed that the Kv1 turret region was responsible for the selectivity of KTX-Sp4 peptide on Kv1.3 over Kv1.1.

Conclusions

This work not only provided a novel lead compound for the development of anti autoimmune disease drugs, but also enriched the molecular basis for the interaction between scorpion toxins and potassium channels, serving as an important theoretical basis for designing high selective Kv1.3 peptide inhibitors.

Glioblastoma-synthesized G-CSF and GM-CSF contribute to growth and immunosuppression: Potential therapeutic benefit from dapsone, fenofibrate, and ribavirin

Increased ratio of circulating neutrophils to lymphocytes is a common finding in glioblastoma and other cancers. Data reviewed establish that any damage to brain tissue tends to cause an increase in G-CSF and/or GM-CSF (G(M)-CSF) synthesized by the brain. Glioblastoma cells themselves also synthesize G(M)-CSF. G(M)-CSF synthesized by brain due to damage by a growing tumor and by the tumor itself stimulates bone marrow to shift hematopoiesis toward granulocytic lineages away from lymphocytic lineages. This shift is immunosuppressive and generates the relative lymphopenia characteristic of glioblastoma. Any trauma to brain—be it blunt, sharp, ischemic, infectious, cytotoxic, tumor encroachment, or radiation—increases brain synthesis of G(M)-CSF. G(M)-CSF are growth and motility enhancing factors for glioblastomas. High levels of G(M)-CSF contribute to the characteristic neutrophilia and lymphopenia of glioblastoma. Hematopoietic bone marrow becomes entrained with, directed by, and contributes to glioblastoma pathology. The antibiotic dapsone, the lipid-lowering agent fenofibrate, and the antiviral drug ribavirin are Food and Drug Administration– and European Medicines Agency–approved medicines that have potential to lower synthesis or effects of G(M)-CSF and thus deprive a glioblastoma of some of the growth promoting contributions of bone marrow and G(M)-CSF.