Reduced risk of all-cancer and solid cancer in Taiwanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with etanercept, a TNF-α inhibitor

ANCA-associated vasculitis and lung cancer: an immunological perspective

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a severe autoimmune disease that often involves the upper and lower respiratory tracts. In recent years, numerous studies have found a significant increase in the incidence of cancer among AAV patients, but the association between lung cancer and AAV remains inconclusive, with relatively low clinical attention. This review summarizes the current literature on the risk of lung cancer in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), detailing the potential mechanisms by which AAV may contribute to lung cancer, and further elucidates the inherent carcinogenic risks of immunosuppressants.There is a correlation between AAV and lung cancer, which is related to T cell senescence and damage, as well as the abnormal expression of cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-10. In AAV patients, the use of cyclophosphamide and azathioprine (AZA) alone has a clear carcinogenic risk, with frequent use of CYC potentially posing a high risk for lung cancer. Although TNF inhibitors (TNFi) combined with CYC have carcinogenic risks, there is insufficient evidence to link them directly to an increased risk of lung cancer. For patients at high risk for lung cancer, the judicious use of immunosuppressants, timely computed tomography (CT), and lung cancer screening can reduce the risk of lung cancer in AAV patients.

Cancer incidence in Familial Mediterranean Fever: A retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is the most common hereditary monogenic fever syndrome that is characterized by recurrent attacks of fever and polyserositis. Anti-inflammatory drugs, with colchicine being the first-line therapy, have been used in the management of FMF. This study aims to evaluate the risk of cancer in Turkish FMF patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively screened the cancer-related outcomes of our study group which consisted of Turkish FMF patients registered at our division. Cancer estimates of the Turkish population were published by the Turkish Ministry of Health in the Turkey Cancer Statistics Report 2018. Standardized incidence rates (SIR) were calculated to compare the cancer incidence observed in our study group with the expected cancer incidence of the Turkish population. Subgroup analyses were conducted on the subgroups, based on gender and usage of biological agents.

RESULTS

Our study included 1734 FMF patients, 1054 (60.8 %) of whom were females. The total follow-up was 68,784 person-years. Cancer was observed in 35 (2 %) of these patients. Turkish FMF patients had a significantly lower incidence of cancer, compared with the overall Turkish population [SIR 0.64 (95 % CI 0.46-0.89), p < 0.01]. No significant association was found between cancer and biological agent therapies in FMF patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from our study indicate that the risk of cancer was decreased by 36 % in Turkish patients with FMF, compared with the outcomes of the overall Turkish population. Life-long exposure to anti-inflammatory drugs, primarily colchicine, may be the underlying reason for this outcome. Further studies are needed for the confirmation and explanation of this association.

JAK inhibitors and the risk of malignancy: a meta-analysis across disease indications

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the association of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) with the incidence of malignancy, compared with placebo, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors (TNFi) and methotrexate.

METHODS

Systematic searches of databases were performed, to December 2022, to identify phase II/III/IV randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and long-term extension (LTE) studies of JAKi (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib, peficitinib) compared with placebo, TNFi or methotrexate, in adults with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, axial spondyloarthritis, inflammatory bowel disease or atopic dermatitis. Network and pairwise meta-analyses were performed to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for malignancy between JAKi and comparators. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias-2 tool.

RESULTS

In 62 eligible RCTs and 16 LTE studies, there were 82 366 person-years of exposure to JAKi, 2924 to placebo, 7909 to TNFi and 1074 to methotrexate. The overall malignancy incidence rate was 1.15 per 100 person-years in RCTs, and 1.26 per 100 person-years across combined RCT and LTE data. In network meta-analyses, the incidence of all malignancies including non-melanomatous skin cancers (NMSCs) was not significantly different between JAKi and placebo (IRR 0.71; 95% CI 0.44 to 1.15) or between JAKi and methotrexate (IRR 0.77; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.68). Compared with TNFi, however, JAKi were associated with an increased incidence of malignancy (IRR 1.50; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.94). Findings were consistent when analysing NMSC only and when analysing combined RCT/LTE data.

CONCLUSIONS

JAKi were associated with a higher incidence of malignancy compared with TNFi but not placebo or methotrexate. Cancers were rare events in all comparisons.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022362630.

Potential of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs to Limit Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth

Inflammation is strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). This review examined the potential role of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) as repurposed drugs for treating AAA. Published evidence from clinical and preclinical studies was examined. Findings from animal models suggested that a deficiency or inhibition of tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (standard mean difference (SMD): −8.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): −9.92, −6.82), interleukin (IL)-6 (SMD: −1.44, 95% CI: −2.85, −0.04) and IL-17 (SMD: −3.36, 95% CI: −4.21, −2.50) led to a significantly smaller AAA diameter compared to controls. Human AAA tissue samples had significantly increased TNF-α (SMD: 1.68, 95% CI: 0.87, 2.49), IL-1β (SMD: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.79), IL-6 (SMD: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.79, 3.33) and IL-17 (SMD: 6.28, 95% CI: 3.57, 8.99) levels compared to non-AAA controls. In human serum, TNF-α (SMD: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.25, 1.97) and IL-6 (SMD: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.92) levels were significantly elevated compared to non-AAA controls. These findings implicate TNF-α, IL-17 and IL-6 in AAA pathogenesis. Randomised controlled trials testing the value of bDMARDs in limiting AAA growth may be warranted.

Biologic DMARDs and targeted synthetic DMARDs and the risk of all-cause mortality in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to compare the risk of all-cause mortality between biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) and non-b/tsDMARDs involving patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of articles published up to August 2021 using electronic databases. We included studies that reported all-cause mortality in RA patients and compared b/tsDMARDs and non-b/tsDMARDs.

RESULTS

We included a total of 77 studies involving 64,428 patients. These comprised 44,227 patients treated with b/tsDMARDs and 20,201 treated with non-b/tsDMARDs. The occurrence of all-cause mortality was the primary outcome. The risk of all-cause mortality between the 2 treatments was not significantly different (relative risk = 1.08; 95% confidence interval = 0.98-1.19). However, subgroup analyses showed significant increase in risks of mortality in anti-TNFs users with RA compared with non-b/tsDMARDs (relative risk = 1.47, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-2.12). No significant differences were found after subgroup analyses based on other molecules involved and study duration.

CONCLUSION

In comparison with non-b/tsDMARDs, our results suggest that antitumor necrosis factor therapy is associated with observed increased risks of mortality and further investigation is needed.

The risk of newly diagnosed cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by TNF inhibitor use: a nationwide cohort study

Background

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has raised safety concerns about cancer risk, but study results remain controversial. This largest nationwide study to date compared cancer risk in TNF inhibitor users to non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (nbDMARD) users in Korean patients with RA.

Methods

Data on all the eligible patients diagnosed with RA between 2005 and 2016 were retrieved from the Korean National Health Information Database. The one-to-one matched patients consisted of the matched cohort. The risks for developing all-type and site-specific cancers were estimated using incidence and incidence rate (IR) per 1000 person-years. Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a Cox regression model.

Results

Of the 22,851 patients in the before matching cohort, 4592 patients were included in the matched cohort. Treatment with TNF inhibitors was consistently associated with a lower risk of cancer than in the nbDMARD cohort (IR per 1000 person-years, 6.5 vs. 15.6; adjusted HR, 0.379; 95% CI, 0.255–0.563). The adjusted HR (95% CI) was significantly lower in the TNF inhibitor cohort than the nbDMARD cohort for gastrointestinal cancer (0.432; 0.235–0.797), breast cancer (0.146; 0.045–0.474), and genitourinary cancer (0.220; 0.059–0.820).

Conclusions

The use of TNF inhibitors was not associated with an increased risk of cancer development, and rather associated with a lower cancer incidence in Korean patients with RA. Cautious interpretation is needed not to oversimplify the study results as cancer-protective effects of TNF inhibitors. A further study linking claims and clinical data is needed to confirm our results.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-022-02868-w.

Inflammation-targeted therapies and cancer

OBJECTIVE

To review and analyze the current knowledge on the risk of malignancy associated with inflammation-targeted therapies in rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

We performed a non-systematic literature review on PubMEd MEDLINE by screening randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, reviews, and observational studies focusing on malignancies and inflammation-targeted therapies including TNF inhibitors, other biologics and JAK inhibitors in rheumatic diseases.

RESULTS

Data from literature are reassuring regarding the overall risk of incident and recurrent cancer with TNF inhibitors. The risk of lymphoma is more difficult to analyze and data are controversial; however, in most of the studies, this risk does not seem to be significanlty increased. By contrast, there is probably an increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer associated with TNF inhibitors, as with other immunosuppressants. There is no signal for an increased risk of malignancies with other biological DMARDs, but additional data are needed. A recent post-marketing surveillance study found out an increased risk of malignancies for tofacitinib compared with TNFi; additional data are, therefore, urgently needed to confirm or not these results.

CONCLUSION

Data are presently reassuring regarding the overall risk of cancer, whatever the inflammation-targeted treatment. However, additional data are needed for non-TNF biologics and JAK-inhibitors.

Utilization of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and cancer

INTRODUCTION

Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) interfere with the immune system and could theoretically increase risk of malignancies. However, recent evidence has not substantiated such concerns and physicians are less reluctant in treating patients with underlying cancer with such bDMARDs. We aimed to understand the current utilization patterns of bDMARDs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in cancer patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with prevalent RA and cancer initially seen at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2002 and 2014. A cohort of cancer patients was identified from the tumor registry, and patients with RA were identified through ICD-9 codes, followed by review of electronic medical records. We included patients 18 years and older, with a cancer diagnosis, and a diagnosis of RA by a rheumatologist. Patients were followed until 2016.

RESULTS

We identified 431 patients with RA and cancer that met our inclusion criteria. Overall, 111 (26%) received bDMARDs after their cancer diagnosis; of these, 60 (54%) had received bDMARDs prior to their cancer diagnosis and continued to receive this therapy following their diagnosis. Thirteen (22%) switched to a different bDMARD, and the rest continued to receive the same agent after their cancer diagnosis. Of all patients on a bDMARD, 91 (82%) received tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment landscape of patients with a history of cancer and RA is changing. Future studies evaluating the safety of bDMARDs in patients with a recent history of cancer or with active cancer are needed. Part of the data of this project was presented as a poster at the 2016 American College of Rheumatology annual meeting. Zamora NV, Siddhanamatha H, Barbo A, Tayar J, Lin H, Suarez-Almazor M. Utilization of Biologic Therapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Cancer [abstract].Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utilization-of-biologic-therapy-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-cancer/. Accessed September 30, 2019. Key Points • One in four patients with RA and concomitant cancer received bDMARDs, including TNFi, after their cancer diagnosis, at our institution. • Half of the patients with RA and cancer who received bDMARDs had initiated therapy prior to the cancer diagnosis, continuing thereafter.

Malignancy and rheumatoid arthritis: Epidemiology, risk factors and management

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory condition that can result in pain and functional disability. It is also associated with an increased occurrence of comorbidities, including an increased risk of certain cancers such as lung cancer and lymphoma. The aetiopathogenesis of this increased cancer risk is likely multifactorial and includes shared risk factors as well as chronic inflammation. There is also a concern that the treatment for RA itself may increase this risk further, particularly treatment with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). This paper aims to review the evidence for the increased risk of cancer in RA as well as the latest evidence for the association between DMARDs and tumorigenesis. It also discusses the evidence for the management of patients with biologic DMARDs in the setting of existing cancer.

The risk of malignancy and its incidence in early rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biologic DMARDs

Background

Treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has raised concerns about the risk of malignancies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, the association between biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and malignancy in previous reports remains controversial. Therefore we aimed to estimate the incidence of malignancy in early RA patients and to evaluate the relative risk of malignancy with use of bDMARDs.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of incident RA patients was established using the Korean National Claims Database. Among a total of 14,081 RA patients identified, 1684 patients with a history of malignancy were excluded. We calculated the incidence rate of overall and individual malignancies. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of malignancies in bDMARD users was compared to that in nonusers. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of bDMARDs on the development of malignancies in early RA patients.

Results

A total of 12,397 early RA patients without a history of malignancy were enrolled. During 41,599 person-years (PY) of follow-up, 725 malignancies developed in 561 patients (174.3/10,000 PY) and 21 hematologic malignancies developed (5.0/10,000 PY). Patients treated with bDMARDs had a significantly lower incidence of overall malignancy compared to those not treated with bDMARDs (SIR 0.45 (95% CI 0.28–0.70)). However, this relationship was not significant with regard to hematologic malignancies (SIR 2.65 (95% CI 0.55–7.76)). On multivariable analysis, bDMARD use was a protective factor against the development of overall malignancy (odds ratio 0.42 (95% CI 0.25–0.73)). However, bDMARD use had no significant protective effect against the development of hematologic malignancies (odds ratio 1.69 (95% CI 0.38–7.59)).

Conclusions

In early RA patients, bDMARD use decreases the overall risk of developing malignancies; however, it does not affect the risk of developing hematologic malignancies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-017-1482-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Malignancy Incidence, Management, and Prevention in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Traditional and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are effective medications for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the effects of these medications on immune function raises concern that they may increase long-term cancer risk. The baseline risk for some cancers appears to differ in patients with RA compared to the general population, with the former having an increased risk of lymphoma, lung cancer and renal cancer, but a decreased risk of colorectal and breast cancer. Some DMARDs appear to increase the rate of specific cancer types (such as bladder cancer with cyclophosphamide), but few appear to increase the overall cancer risk. Studying the link between lymphoma and disease severity in RA is complicated because patients with persistently active disease are at increased risk for lymphoma, and disease severity correlates with more intense use of immunosuppressive medications. Overall, cancer risk in patients with RA is slightly above that of the general population, with the increased risk likely secondary to an increased risk of lymphomas in those with high disease activity. Risk mitigation includes management of RA disease activity as well as age- and sex-appropriate cancer screening.