Stratification of risk groups according to survival after recurrence in endometrial cancer patients

Analysis of East Asia subgroup in Study 309/KEYNOTE-775: lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician's choice chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

In the global phase 3 Study 309/KEYNOTE-775 (NCT03517449) at the first interim analysis, lenvatinib+pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) versus treatment of physician's choice chemotherapy (TPC) in patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). This exploratory analysis evaluated outcomes in patients enrolled in East Asia at the time of prespecified final analysis.

METHODS

Women ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced, recurrent, or metastatic EC with progressive disease after 1 platinum-based chemotherapy (2 if 1 given in neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting) were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks (≤35 cycles) or TPC (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). Primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS. No alpha was assigned for this subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Among 155 East Asian patients (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab, n=77; TPC, n=78), median follow-up time (data cutoff: March 1, 2022) was 34.3 (range, 25.1-43.0) months. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab vs. TPC) were 0.74 (0.49-1.10) and 0.64 (0.44-0.94) in the mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and all-comer populations, respectively. HRs (95% CI) for OS were 0.68 (0.45-1.02) and 0.61 (0.41-0.90), respectively. ORRs were 36% with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab and 22% with TPC (pMMR) and 39% and 21%, respectively (all-comers). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97% and 96% (grade 3-5, 74% and 72%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Lenvatinib+pembrolizumab provided clinically meaningful benefit with manageable safety compared with TPC, supporting its use in East Asian patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent EC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03517449.

Prognostic factors in patients with endometrial cancer with isolated lymphatic recurrence

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinicopathological features and outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer with isolated lymphatic recurrence after lymphadenectomy, stratified by different isolated lymphatic recurrence sites and treatment approaches.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all surgically treated patients with endometrial cancer, identifying those with recurrence. We defined primary isolated lymphatic recurrence as the first and unique evidence of recurrence in lymph node-bearing areas, without concomitant vaginal, hematogenous, or peritoneal recurrence. Isolated lymphatic recurrences were classified as pelvic, para-aortic, distant, or multiple sites. Our primary outcome was cause-specific survival after diagnosis of the recurrence.

RESULTS

Among 4216 patients with surgically staged endometrial cancer, we identified 66 (1.6%) women with isolated lymphatic recurrence. The overall median cause-specific survival for patients with isolated lymphatic recurrence was 24 months. Although cause-specific survival was not significantly different between the four isolated lymphatic recurrence groups (p=0.21), 7 of 15 (47%) patients with isolated lymphatic recurrence in the para-aortic area were long-term survivors. At multivariate Cox regression, the absence of lymphovascular space invasion and grade 1 histology in the primary tumor were significantly associated with improved cause-specific survival. In addition, patients with isolated lymphatic recurrence who underwent surgery for recurrence (with/without other associated therapies) had improved cause-specific survival compared with patients who did not undergo surgery, also after adjusting for age.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-grade histology and absence of lymphovascular space invasion in the primary tumor were predictors of improved prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer with isolated lymphatic recurrence. In addition, in this retrospective cohort, patients with isolated lymphatic recurrence who were selected for eradicative surgical treatment had improved cause-specific survival.

The contemporary presentation and diagnosis of endometrial cancer recurrence: When, where, and how?

OBJECTIVE

To examine patients with confirmed endometrial cancer recurrence; evaluate patterns, presentation, and mode of diagnosis.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of women with endometrial cancer diagnosis between 2014 and 2020. Disease recurrences were evaluated. Medical records were reviewed focusing on presentation at time of recurrence. Relationships were assessed using χ2, Fisher's exact test, t-test, and Wilcoxon test. The Kaplan-Meier product limit was used to estimate survival. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the impact of covariates.

RESULTS

Endometrial cancer recurrence was identified in 201 (11.7%) patients. Sixty percent (120/201) of patients presented with symptoms. Pain was the most common presenting symptom (23.4%, 47/201) and bleeding was reported in <14% (28/201). Patients with symptomatic presentation were less likely to be able to receive treatment for their recurrent disease (76.7% vs 91.3%, p = 0.005). Asymptomatic pelvic exam diagnosed recurrence in 13.4% (27/201) and was more common in patients initially diagnosed with early-stage disease (66.7% vs 34.5% p = 0.001) of endometrioid histology (66.7% vs 36.8%, p = 0.003) without prior adjuvant therapy (48.2% vs 17.9%, p = 0.001). More than1/3 of diagnoses were made by providers outside of the oncologic care team.

CONCLUSION

The majority of women with recurrent endometrial cancer were symptomatic and pain is a common complaint associated with disease recurrence. Patients with symptomatic presentation of disease recurrence were less likely to receive treatment for recurrent disease but this did not result in an overall survival (OS) difference. Given the rising mortality rate of endometrial cancer further work is needed to develop multidisciplinary surveillance strategies that will enable meaningful treatment of disease recurrence.

Reassessment of intensive surveillance practices adopted for endometrial cancer survivors

Background

In Japan, 17,000 women are newly diagnosed with endometrial cancer in 2018. The healthcare insurance policy in Japan provides more intensive patient surveillance compared with the United States and European countries. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze data, including surveillance methods, recurrence sites, salvage therapy, and survival period after recurrence, to consider the benefits of surveillance for patients with endometrial cancer.

Methods

Between January 2009 and December 2015, the medical records of patients who were initially diagnosed with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I–IV endometrial cancer and treated were enrolled in this retrospective study. Only patients with stage IV cancer with peritoneal dissemination were included. Within the first 2 years, the included patients underwent tumor marker tests, Papanicolaou smear test every 1–3-months, and imaging analysis at 6–12- month intervals. Until 4 years, the patients underwent regular surveys every 4 months and imaging analysis annually. Subsequently, the patients received regular surveys every 6 -to 12-months. Results.

Among 847 patients, 88 experienced recurrence, and their clinicopathological data were statistically analyzed. The recurrence site was not associated with the initial treatment method or histology. Among the patients with recurrence, 75% were asymptomatic. Univariate analysis demonstrated that time to recurrence and local recurrence were significant factors for survival outcomes, whereas multivariate analysis indicated that only local recurrence was a significant factor. In patients with distant metastasis, neither symptomatic nor asymptomatic recurrence showed a significant difference in survival.

Conclusions

In this retrospective study, an intensive surveillance protocol did not benefit patients with endometrial cancer. Thus, we hypothesize that the characterization of tumors by emerging technologies that can precisely predict the nature of the tumor will help tailor individualized and efficient surveillance programs. In addition, the ideal salvage therapy needs to be developed to benefit patients after recurrence.

Identification of endometrial cancer recurrence - a validated algorithm based on nationwide Danish registries

INTRODUCTION

Recurrence of endometrial cancer is not routinely registered in the Danish national health registers. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a register-based algorithm to identify women diagnosed with endometrial cancer recurrence in Denmark to facilitate register-based research in this field.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a cohort study based on data from Danish health registers. The algorithm was designed to identify women with recurrence and estimate the accompanying diagnosis date, which was based on information from the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish National Pathology Registry. Indicators of recurrence were pathology registrations and procedure or diagnosis codes suggesting recurrence and related treatment. The gold standard for endometrial cancer recurrence originated from a Danish nationwide study of 2612 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer, FIGO stage I-II during 2005-2009. Recurrence was suspected in 308 women based on pathology reports, and recurrence suspicion was confirmed or rejected in the 308 women based on reviews of the medical records. The algorithm was validated by comparing the recurrence status identified by the algorithm and the recurrence status in the gold standard.

RESULTS

After relevant exclusions, the final study population consisted of 268 women, hereof 160 (60%) with recurrence according to the gold standard. The algorithm displayed a sensitivity of 91.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 85.8-95.1), a specificity of 91.7% (95% CI: 84.8-96.1) and a positive predictive value of 94.2% (95% CI: 89.3-97.3). The algorithm estimated the recurrence date within 30 days of the gold standard in 86% and within 60 days of the gold standard in 94% of the identified patients.

DISCUSSION

The algorithm demonstrated good performance; it could be a valuable tool for future research in endometrial cancer recurrence and may facilitate studies with potential impact on clinical practice.

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for rare gynecologic indications: peritoneal metastases from breast and endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) in patients with breast (BC) and endometrial cancer (EC) is rare and treatment options are limited. Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) has demonstrated efficacy against PM from various cancers, but its efficacy in BC/EC patients is unknown.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients with PM from BC/EC undergoing PIPAC with doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m² and cisplatin 7.5 mg/m². Data were collected within an international prospective PIPAC registry. Study outcomes were microscopic tumor regression grade (TRG), survival, adverse events (CTCAE), and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

150 PIPAC procedures in 44 patients (BC/EC = 28/16; mean age 58.8 ± 10.1 and 63.2 ± 10.1 years, respectively) were analyzed. The mean number of PIPACs per patient was 3 (range 0-9) and 3.5 (range 0-10), respectively. Primary/secondary non-access occurred in 4/3 of 150 (5%) procedures. PIPAC induced objective tumor regression as demonstrated by repetitive PM biopsies in 73% (32/44) of patients. Peri- and postoperative CTCAE grade 3 and 4 complications were observed in 12/150 (8%) of procedures. No grade 5 event was observed. After a median follow up of 5.7 (IQR 2.7-13.0) months, overall median survival was 19.6 (95% CI: 7.8-31.5) months (from first PIPAC). QoL indicators (general health, nausea, fatigue, constipation, pain, dyspnea, social, cognitive, emotional, and physical functioning) all improved or were maintained throughout PIPAC treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Repetitive intraperitoneal chemotherapy with PIPAC is feasible and safe in patients with PM from BC and EC. PIPAC induces significant histological regression of PM while maintaining QoL.

MR volumetry in predicting the aggressiveness of endometrioid adenocarcinoma: correlation with final pathological results

Background

Magnetic resonance (MR) has been widely used in predicting the aggressiveness of endometrioid adenocarcinoma. However, the diagnostic value of the MR volume of the lesion has been controversial.

Purpose

To determine whether the whole-lesion MR volume measurement could be used as a better predictor for evaluating the aggressiveness of endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Material and Methods

In this retrospective study, we include 357 patients with pathologically demonstrated endometrioid adenocarcinoma at our institution between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018. Whole-lesion MR volume was calculated on sagittal T2-weighted images with ITK-SNAP software on a personal computer.

Results

According to the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, whole-lesion MR volume has the competitive advantage in evaluating deep myometrial invasion compared with the frozen results, generating area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.751 vs. 0.834 ( P = 0.0629, Z = 1.860). The AUC of tumor maximum diameter, simple tumor volume, and whole-lesion MR volume in predicting deep myometrial invasion was 63.8%, 67.6%, and 75.1%, respectively.

Conclusion

Whole-lesion MR volume is a good diagnostic tool for prediction of deep myometrial invasion, lymph node metastasis, and lymphovascular invasion. MR volumetry could reflect the aggressiveness of endometrioid adenocarcinoma more accurately than traditional lesion measurements.

Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment Status and Histological Grading of Endometrial Carcinoma

The recent successes of new cancer immunotherapy approaches have led to investigate their relevance in the context of the Endometrial Carcinoma (EC). These therapies, that take the tumor-induced immunosuppressive microenvironment into account, target the tumor immune escape, in particular the inhibitory receptors involved in the regulation of the effector T cells' activity (immune checkpoints). The aim of this study was to identify, in ECs, differences in intergrades immune status that could contribute to the differences in tumor aggressiveness, and could also be used as theranostic tools. The immune status of tumors was assessed by quantitative real-time PCR. We analyzed the expression of specific genes associated to specific leukocytes subpopulations and the expression of reporting genes associated with the tumor escape/resistance. This study highlights significant differences in the EC intergrades immune status especially the tumor-infiltrating cell types and their activation status as well as in the molecular factors produced by the environment. The immune microenvironment of grade 1 ECs hints at a robust tumoricidal milieu while that of higher grades is more evocative of a tolerogenic milieu. This genes-based immunological monitoring of tumors that easily highlights significant intergrade differences relating to the density, composition and functional state of the leukocyte infiltrate, could give solid arguments for choosing the best therapeutic options, especially those targeting immune checkpoints. Moreover it could enable an easy adaptation of individual treatment approaches for each patient.