Efficacy and safety of liraglutide versus sitagliptin both in combination with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The Key Role of Liraglutide in Preventing Autophagy of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in High Glucose Conditions

Background

The glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist liraglutide (LIRA) is a potential hypoglycemic drug with anti-atherosclerosis (AS) effects. Autophagy in the vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) facilitates AS. However, the role of autophagy in the anti-AS mechanism of LIRA remains unclear.

Aims

To examine the role and mechanisms of autophagy in LIRA’s improvement of the biological characteristics of VSMCs in high glucose conditions.

Study Design

Experimental animal study.

Methods

VSMCs isolated from the thoracic aorta of male SD rats were subjected to a high glucose (HG) condition (25 mM) in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium with or without LIRA, the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin9-39 (Exe9-39), a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor (LY294002), and autophagy inhibitors (3-methyladenine [3-MA] and bafilomycin A1 [Baf A1]). Acridine orange staining, western blotting, transmission electron microscopy, and mCherry-GFP-LC3 transfection were performed to evaluate the autophagy flux. Additionally, VSMC migration, calcification, proliferation, and apoptosis in HG conditions were observed.

Results

Addition of LIRA alone or in combination with autophagy inhibitors significantly downregulated Beclin, increased the LC3-II/LC3-I ratio, and upregulated p62 in VSMCs in HG conditions. Furthermore, autophagolysosome formation was markedly curbed after treatment with LIRA and/or autophagy inhibitors. Inhibition of autophagy by LIRA and/or the autophagy inhibitors attenuated VSMC phenotype conversion, proliferation, migration, and calcification and promoted VSMC apoptosis in HG conditions. This protective role of LIRA was augmented by LY294002, but inhibited by Exe9-39.

Conclusion

LIRA plays a significant role in the improvement of the biological features of VSMCs in HG conditions.

[Indicators of diabetes mellitus after liraglutide, sitagliptin/metformin, linagliptin, and sitagliptin]

Background

The control of diabetes mellitus is multifactorial, the different therapeutic options make it necessary to compare the effectiveness with previous therapeutic schemes.

Objective

Analize the indicators of control of diabetes mellitus after incorporating liraglutide, sitagliptin/metformin, linagliptin, and sitagliptin.

Methods

Observational, analytical, longitudinal study. Glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and blood pressure were compared after the inclusion of new cues in patients with diabetes mellitus; in addition to the control indicators reported in the unit in october, november, and december 2000, with those of 2021 in the same months. A descriptive analysis was performed, T for related samples and McNemar, a value of < .05 was considered significant, a confidence level of 95%, with the IBM-SPSS 24 software.

Results

352 files were analyzed, 59% women, aged 26 to 88 years, and the percentage of control decreased after the change of scheme (38.4% vs 35.8%) without a statistical difference (p .503). There was no statistical difference between the levels of glucose, glycated hemoglobin, weight, and blood pressure before and six months after the change. In the unit, the regimen glycemic control indicator improved in October, November, and December 2020 compared to the same months in 2021, it increased (from 17.2, 18.7, and 16.3, to 41.6, 47.2, and 46.5%). Blood pressure control went from 64.5, 66.7, and 67 to 82.4, 85.1, and 83.1%.

Conclusions

The control indicators in the unit improved, however, the patients who used the new keys did not show any difference.

[Comparison of therapeutic effect of metformin hydrochloride/vildagliptin and liraglutide on type 2 diabetes mellitus in obese patients]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic effects of two therapeutic strategies based on metformin hydrochloride/vildagliptin and liraglutide on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in obese patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 107 obese patients (BMI>25 kg/m2) with T2DM treated in Second Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Wuhu, China) during 2019-2021, including 53 patients treated continuously with metformin hydrochloride/vildagliptin and 54 with liraglutide for 3 months. The changes in BMI, waist circumference, fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose, HbA1C, fasting C-peptide, postprandial C-peptide, fasting insulin and postprandial insulin of the patients after treatment were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In both of the groups, the patients all showed significant reductions of BMI, waist circumference, FBG, postprandial blood glucose and HbA1C (all P < 0.05) with improved fasting and postprandial C-peptide levels after the treatments (P < 0.05). The two treatment regimens showed comparable blood glucoselowering effects, but liraglutide produced better effect in reducing waist circumference (P < 0.01). Neither of two regimens obviously affected insulin level of the patients (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both metformin hydrochloride/vildagliptin and liraglutide have good therapeutic effects on T2DM in obese patients and can achieve good blood glucose and weight control, but liraglutide has a better effect for weight control.

Comparing the bioequivalence and safety of liraglutide in healthy Chinese subjects: an open, single-dose, randomized, repeated, two-sequence, two-cycle phase I clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an endogenous incretin hormone. Liraglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, can lower blood sugar by increasing insulin production and inhibiting the production of glucagon. This study researched the bioequivalence and safety of the test and reference drugs in healthy Chinese subjects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Subjects (N = 28) were randomly divided into group A and group B at a ratio of 1:1 for a two-cycle cross-over study. There was single dose per cycle with subcutaneous injection of the test and reference drugs, respectively. The washout was set at 14 days. Plasma drug concentrations were detected by specific liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays. Statistical analysis of major pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters was conducted to assess drug bioequivalence. In addition, we evaluated the safety of the drugs throughout the trial.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of C_max, AUC_0-t, and AUC_0-∞ for the test and reference drugs were 107.11%, 106.56%, 106.09%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were all within 80%-125%, meeting the bioequivalence standards. In addition, both had good safety in this study.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that the two drugs had similar bioequivalence and safety.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

DCTR: CTR20190914; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05029076.

Side effect profile of pharmacologic therapies for liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Several studies have found that antifibrosis treatment for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) can cause a variety of side effects. No network meta-analysis (NMA) analyzes the adverse events of antifibrotic drugs for NAFLD. This NMA aimed to systematically compare the drug-related side effects when using different pharmacological agents for the treatment of liver fibrosis in NAFLD. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were systematically searched to select related studies published in English from the database inception until 30 June 2022. We conducted Bayesian fixed-effects NMA using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to derive relative risks (RRs). The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities was used to assess ranking. A total of 26 RCTs with 19 interventions met the inclusion criteria. SUCRA analysis suggested that the lanifibranor group had the highest risk of diarrhea (SUCRA, 94), whereas the liraglutide group had the highest risk of constipation (SUCRA, 92.9). The semaglutide group showed the highest incidence of nausea (SUCRA, 81.2) and abdominal pain (SUCRA, 90.5), respectively. The cenicriviroc group showed the highest risk in the incidence of fatigue (SUCRA, 82.4). The MSDC-0602K group had the highest risk of headache (SUCRA, 76.4), whereas the obeticholic acid group had the highest risk of pruritus (SUCRA, 80.1). The risk of side effects significantly varied among different pharmacologic regimens, and evidence showed that lanifibranor, liraglutide, semaglutide, cenicriviroc, MSDC-0602K and obeticholic acid were the pharmacological interventions with the highest risk in patients with NAFLD. This study may guide clinicians and support further research.

Pharmacokinetic comparison of sitagliptin and metformin HCl extended-release tablets versus JANUMET® XR in healthy volunteers under fasting and fed conditions

Background and Objectives: Janumet^® XR is the combination of sitagliptin and extended metformin hydrochloride produced by Merck Sharp & Dohme. It is specially designed for diabetes mellitus patients taking both drugs already. Janumet^® XR exhibited clinically significant blood glucose lowering efficacy and long-term use safety. However, no generic form of Janumet^® XR has been approved in western countries. The relatively high cost made the medication less prescribed. A more affordable form of this drug may benefit an immense diabetes mellitus population. The current study compared the bioequivalence (BE) of sitagliptin 100 mg and metformin 1000 mg produced by Nanjing Chia-Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Company to Janumet^® XR in healthy Chinese subjects. Methods: Twenty-eight healthy Chinese subjects were enrolled in Study 1 and 2, respectively. Both studies were conducted with an open, randomized, two-period crossover design using the test (T) or the reference (R) drug. Study 1 is conducted under the fasting state, and Study 2 is under the fed state. Subjects received an oral dose of sitagliptin 100 mg and metformin 1000 mg, and plasma concentrations of sitagliptin and metformin were determined up to 72 h post-dose. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, including maximum serum concentration (C_max) and area under the concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC_0-t) of both sitagliptin and metformin, were calculated and compared between the T and R treatments. Results: In the fasting study, the geometric mean ratios of C_max, AUC_0-t, and AUC_0-∞ for sitagliptin were 109.42%, 101.93%, and 101.95%, respectively; the corresponding ratios for metformin were 98.69%, 94.12%, and 93.42%, respectively. In the fed study, the geometric mean ratios of C_max, AUC_0-t, and AUC_0-∞ for sitagliptin were 98.41%, 100.30%, and 100.24%, respectively; the corresponding ratios for metformin were 97.79%, 99.28%, and 100.69%, respectively. The 90% CIs of C_max, AUC_0-t, and AUC_0-∞ in both studies were all within acceptance limits (80.00%-125.00%). Conclusion: The results demonstrated for the first time that sitagliptin 100 mg and metformin 1000 mg produced by Nanjing Chia-Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Company was bioequivalent to the branded Janumet^® XR, and both drugs were well tolerated.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide updated and new evidence-based recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes mellitus to clinicians, diabetes-care teams, other health care professionals and stakeholders, and individuals with diabetes and their caregivers.

METHODS

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology selected a task force of medical experts and staff who updated and assessed clinical questions and recommendations from the prior 2015 version of this guideline and conducted literature searches for relevant scientific papers published from January 1, 2015, through May 15, 2022. Selected studies from results of literature searches composed the evidence base to update 2015 recommendations as well as to develop new recommendations based on review of clinical evidence, current practice, expertise, and consensus, according to established American Association of Clinical Endocrinology protocol for guideline development.

RESULTS

This guideline includes 170 updated and new evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes. Recommendations are divided into four sections: (1) screening, diagnosis, glycemic targets, and glycemic monitoring; (2) comorbidities and complications, including obesity and management with lifestyle, nutrition, and bariatric surgery, hypertension, dyslipidemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease; (3) management of prediabetes, type 2 diabetes with antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy and glycemic targets, type 1 diabetes with insulin therapy, hypoglycemia, hospitalized persons, and women with diabetes in pregnancy; (4) education and new topics regarding diabetes and infertility, nutritional supplements, secondary diabetes, social determinants of health, and virtual care, as well as updated recommendations on cancer risk, nonpharmacologic components of pediatric care plans, depression, education and team approach, occupational risk, role of sleep medicine, and vaccinations in persons with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations to assist with person-centered, team-based clinical decision-making to improve the care of persons with diabetes mellitus.

Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease in China

Background

In several cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs), empagliflozin (SGLT-2 inhibitor), sitagliptin (DPP-4 inhibitor) and liraglutide (GLP-1 receptor agonist) + standard of care (SoC) were compared to SoC in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study assessed the cost-effectiveness (CE) of empagliflozin + SoC in comparison to sitagliptin + SoC and liraglutide + SoC based on the respective CVOT.

Methods

The IQVIA Core Diabetes Model (CDM) was calibrated to reproduce the CVOT outcomes. EMPA-REG OUTCOME baseline characteristics and CVOT specific treatment effects on risk factors for cardiovascular disease (HbA1c, BMI, blood pressure, lipids) were applied. Three-year observed cardiovascular events of empagliflozin + SoC versus sitagliptin + SoC and liraglutide + SoC were derived from EMPA-REG OUTCOME and an indirect treatment comparison. Relative risk adjustments to calibrate the CDM were obtained after a trial and error process to match as closely the observed and CDM-predicted outcomes. The drug-specific treatment effects were considered up until HbA1c reached 8.5% and treatment switch occurred. After this switch, the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study 82 risk equations predicted events based on co-existing risk factors and treatment intensification to basal bolus insulin were applied. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system applying 3% discounting. The time horizon was lifelong.

Results

Empagliflozin + SoC provides additional Quality Adjusted Life years (QALY + 0.564) for an incremental cost of 42,497RMB (US$6053) compared to sitagliptin + SoC, resulting in an Incremental Cost Utility Ratio of 75,349RMB (US$10,732), thus below the willingness-to-pay threshold of 212,676RMB, corresponding to three times the Gross Domestic Product in China (2019). Compared to liraglutide + SoC, empagliflozin + SoC use leads to 0.211QALY gained and cost savings of 71,427RMB (US$10,173) and is as such dominant. Scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results.

Conclusion

Results suggest that empagliflozin + SoC is cost-effective compared to sitagliptin + SoC and liraglutide + SoC at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 212,676RMB ($30,292)/QALY.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-021-00299-z.

Side Effects Associated with Liraglutide Treatment for Obesity as Well as Diabetes

Liraglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist used as a treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus, which has been expanded for use at a higher dose in weight control. Therefore, it is necessary to consider adverse reactions of the drug at high doses as well as at lower doses after the indication has been expanded. Body mass index criteria for patients prescribed the drug in the real world tend to be applied less rigorously, which may increase the number of adverse reactions due to over-prescription. Liraglutide treatment was found effective and safe in some studies, while others have warned about its risks. Therefore, this review summarizes the current data available on side effects associated with liraglutide.

Analysis of the effect of liraglutide on glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes

The efficacy of liraglutide in the treatment of glycemic variability in type 2 diabetic patients remains to be fully elucidated. Some studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in glycemic variability, and this meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the results of existing studies on the efficacy of liraglutide. We conducted a comprehensive search for all relevant studies published in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and China Academic Journal Full-Text Database from the beginning of 2011 to October 31, 2019. The mean ± SD and 95% confidence interval were used for evaluation, and subgroup and sensitivity analysis were carried out. Publication bias was estimated by funnel plots and Egger's tests. A total of 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis involving 492 participants. MAGE (mean amplitude of glycemic excursion), LAGE (largest amplitude of glycemic excursions), SD (standard deviation of blood glucose), and MODD (mean of daily differences) were collected to reflect the variability of blood glucose. The glycemic variability indexes of patients before and after treatment with liraglutide were compared. Patients with treatment had lower glycemic variability compared with patients receiving treatment of liraglutide. Compared with the patients before the treatment, the patients after the treatment had a smaller glycemic variability (MAGE: I² = 92%, p < 0.01, Z = 11.91, p < 0.01, MD = -2.78, 95%CI: -3.24 - -2.32; LAGE: I² = 76%, p = 0.08, Z = 9.94, p < 0.01, MD = -2.20, 95%CI: -2.59 - -1.81; MODD: I² = 74%, p = 0.002, Z = 14.03, p < 0.01, MD = -0.90, 95%CI: -1.02 - -0.77; SD: I² = 93%, p < 0.01, Z = 3.62, p < 0.01, SMD = -1.77, 95%CI: -2.73 - -0.81). Sensitivity analysis showed that our results were reliable and no evidence of significant publication bias was detected. The results of this study suggest that patients with type 2 diabetes treated with liraglutide are associated with lower glycemic variability.

Real-world Effectiveness of Liraglutide vs. Sitagliptin Among Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan: A Retrospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Liraglutide and sitagliptin were compared on glycemic control and all-cause healthcare costs over a 1-year period among older adults with type 2 diabetes (65-89 years) enrolled in a national Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug health plan.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study in which the index date was the first prescription fill for liraglutide or sitagliptin between 25 January 2010 and 31 December 2014. Post-index treatment persistence and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1_c) at baseline and 1 year (± 90 days) post-index date were required. Patients were excluded if their record included use of insulin during the baseline period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using stabilized weights was employed with final covariate adjusted regression modeling to estimate the primary outcome (mean change in HbA1_c) and secondary outcomes (achieving glycemic goal and costs), each at 1-year post-index date.

RESULTS

Overall, 3056 patients met the selection criteria, of whom 218 filled prescriptions for liraglutide and 2838 for sitagliptin. Adjusted mean change in HbA1_c at 1 year post-index was - 0.42 with liraglutide versus - 0.12 with sitagliptin (P  = 0.0012). Adjusted odds of achieving the treatment goals of HbA1_c < 7% and achieving an HbA1_c reduction of ≥ 1% were higher for  those on liraglutide than for those on sitagliptin (1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-2.24 and 1.76, 95% CI 1.31-2.36), respectively. Total healthcare costs in those achieving an HbA1_c of < 7% were not significantly different between treatment groups but were higher within the liraglutide group for those achieving an HbA1_c < 8%.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared to sitagliptin, liraglutide was associated with greater achievement of an HbA1_c < 7% over a 1-year period in an older population. This finding was not associated with a statistically significant increase in all-cause total healthcare costs, although costs were slightly higher in the liraglutide group than in the sitagliptin group.

Gastrin secretion in normal subjects and diabetes patients is inhibited by glucagon-like peptide 1: a role in the gastric side effects of GLP-1-derived drugs?

Background: Randomized and controlled trials of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) derived drugs have shown that the most frequent adverse symptoms are gastrointestinal. Some of the side effects such as dyspepsia, nausea and upper abdominal pain may well be of gastric origin. Since the antral hormone gastrin regulates gastric secretion of acid and enzymes and contributes to the regulation of gastric motility, we examined the effect of GLP-1 on the secretion of gastrin in normal subjects and diabetes patients.Method: Plasma was sampled from ten healthy subjects and ten patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 with glucose clamped between 6 and 9 mM. GLP-1 or saline were infused for 4 h during and after a meal. Plasma concentrations of gastrin and GLP-1 were measured using specific radioimmunoassays.Results: Basal plasma concentrations of gastrin were similar in controls and patients. After the meal, the gastrin concentrations rose significantly during saline infusion, whereas the GLP-1 infusion suppressed the secretion of gastrin significantly, most pronounced in the diabetes patients.Conclusions: The results show that GLP-1 infusion suppresses the postprandial secretion of gastrin in normal subjects and even more so in the diabetes patients. The results may therefore shed further light on the upper gastrointestinal side effects of GLP-1-derived drugs in diabetic patients.

Determination of Electroacupuncture Effects on circRNAs in Plasma Exosomes in Diabetic Mice: An RNA-Sequencing Approach

circRNAs are involved in diabetes mellitus pathogenesis. Electroacupuncture (EA) is an effective therapeutic strategy for diabetes mellitus. However, whether the mechanism of action of EA on diabetes mellitus is related to altered circRNAs is unclear. The aim of this study was to reveal the effect of EA on circRNA expression in plasma exosomes and the underlying signaling pathway in mice with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In total, 10 mice were randomly categorized into a normal group and 20 mice were used for the T2DM model preparation and randomly divided into the model and model + EA groups. Mice in the model + EA group were administered EA treatment. Changes in the fasting blood glucose (FBG) level and islet structure were evaluated. Plasma exosomes were subjected to RNA sequencing, and then bioinformatics analysis and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) verification were performed. EA treatment reduced the FBG level, preserved the islet structure, and reduced the islet β cell apoptotic rate in T2DM mice. After EA treatment, 165 differentially expressed circRNAs were found. GO and KEGG analyses revealed that thyroid hormone signaling was actively regulated by EA. circRNA/miRNA interaction analysis revealed mmu-mir-7092-3p to be closely associated with circINPP4B, suggesting that the phosphatidylinositol signaling pathway may be affected by EA. qPCR confirmed that 12 circRNAs had significant differences. These findings suggested that EA intervention can significantly protect islet function and improve the FBG level in T2DM, possibly via regulation of thyroid hormone and phosphatidylinositol signaling.

Questionable Industry-Sponsored Postneonatal Pediatric Studies in Slovenia

BACKGROUND

US and EU pediatric laws promote industry-sponsored pediatric studies, based on the therapeutic orphans concept that claims discrimination of children in drug treatment and drug development.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the medical validity of international pediatric studies with centers in Slovenia, an EU member state, and challenge their medical utility.

METHODS

We analyzed international industry-sponsored pediatric studies with centers in Slovenia, listed in www.ClinicalTrials.gov, for their medical value.

RESULTS

Most pediatric studies triggered by the US Food and Drug Administration and by the European Medicines Agency were/are without medical or scientific value. They were/are formally and regulatorily justified, but lack medical sense and thus were/are unethical. Several even harm children and/or adolescents with serious diseases by exposing them to placebo or substandard treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric studies triggered by US and EU regulatory demands are a serious abuse of nonneonatal children and adolescents in Slovenia and worldwide. They are medically redundant at best and often deter patients from effective innovative personalized therapy. They also exclude young patients from reasonable studies. Institutional review boards/ethics committees should be alerted, should critically review all ongoing pediatric studies, should suspend those found to be questionable, and should reject newly submitted questionable ones.

DPP-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a methodology overview of systematic reviews

AIMS

To evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs), and summarize evidence of important outcomes from dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4-I) in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

We included SRs of DPP4-I for the treatment of T2DM until January, 2018 by searching the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and three Chinese databases. We evaluated the methodological qualities with the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool and the GRADE (The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.

RESULTS

Sixty-three SRs (a total of 2,603,140 participants) receiving DPP4-I for the treatment of T2DM were included. The results of AMSTAR showed that the lowest quality was "a list of studies (included and excluded) item" with only one (1.6%) study provided, followed by the "providing a priori design" item with only four (6.3%) studies conforming to this item, the next were "the status of publication (gray literature) used as an inclusion criterion item", with only 18 (28.9%) studies conforming to these items. Only seven (11.1%) studies scored more than nine points in AMSTAR, indicating high methodological quality. For GRADE, of the 128 outcomes, high quality evidence was provided in only 28 (21.9%), moderate in 70 (54.7%), low in 27 (21.1%), and very low in three (2.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The methodological quality of SRs of DPP4-I for type 2 diabetes mellitus is not high and there are common areas for improvement. Furthermore, the quality of evidence level is moderate and more high quality evidence is needed.

Cholecystokinin secretion is suppressed by glucagon-like peptide-1: clue to the mechanism of the adverse gallbladder events of GLP-1-derived drugs

OBJECTIVE

Recent randomized and controlled trials of drugs derived from the gut hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) show that the most frequent adverse symptoms are gastrointestinal, including gallbladder-related side effects such as cholithiasis and cholecystitis. Since the gut hormone cholecystokinin (CCK) stimulates bile secretion and regulates gallbladder motility and emptying, we examined the effect of GLP-1 on the secretion of CCK in normal subjects and patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma was sampled from 10 healthy subjects and 10 patients with diabetes. With plasma glucose concentrations clamped between 6 and 9 nmol/l, GLP-1 or saline was infused for 240 min during and after a meal. The plasma concentrations of CCK were measured with a highly specific radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

Basal plasma concentrations of CCK were similar in the normal subjects and in the diabetes patients. During the meal, the CCK concentrations rose significantly during saline infusion, whereas the GLP-1 infusion suppressed the secretion of CCK significantly in both normal subjects and in the diabetes patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that GLP-1 suppresses the secretion of CCK after a meal in normal and diabetic subjects. The suppression attenuates the gallbladder contractility. Our data, therefore, offer an explanation for the increased risk of adverse gallbladder events during treatment with GLP-1-derived drugs.

The Origin and Understanding of the Incretin Concept

Gastrointestinal hormones that stimulate insulin secretion at physiological concentrations are incretins. This concept has recently attracted considerable attention in the wake of drugs developed from the gut hormone GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) for diabetes therapy. But the renewed enthusiasm has also restricted the concept to just two hormones, GLP-1 and GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide). The purpose of the present overview is two-fold: First to tell that the incretin concept is far from new. It has a more than a century long history full of ups and downs. Second, that the incretin concept may now have become too narrow. Thus, it is likely that incretin comprises additional gastrointestinal hormones, which interact with GIP and GLP-1 during normal meals containing protein, fat and complex carbohydrates (and not just pure glucose). Such broader incretin concept may stimulate development of novel gut hormone-derived drugs.

Real-World Clinical Effectiveness and Cost Savings of Liraglutide Versus Sitagliptin in Treating Type 2 Diabetes for 1 and 2 Years

INTRODUCTION

This study compared the clinical and economic outcomes of long-term use of liraglutide versus sitagliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in real-world practice in the USA.

METHODS

We identified adult patients (≥ 18 years old) with T2DM who initiated liraglutide or sitagliptin in 2010-2014 using a large claims database. Quarterly glycemic control measures and annual healthcare costs were assessed during the 1st and 2nd years of persistent medication use. Their associations with medication use (liraglutide or sitagliptin) were estimated using multivariable regression models adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 3113 patients persistently used liraglutide (N = 493) or sitagliptin (N = 2620) for ≥ 1 year [mean age (standard deviation, SD): 53 (8.5) vs. 56 (9.7) years; 48.3% vs. 62.3% males; both p < 0.05]; 911 (including 113 liraglutide users) were persistent users for ≥ 2 years. During the 1st-year follow-up, liraglutide users (versus sitagliptin users, after adjustment) experienced larger glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reductions from baseline (ranging from 0.34%-point in quarter 1 to 0.21%-point in quarter 4); higher likelihoods of obtaining HbA1c reductions of ≥ 1%-points or ≥ 2%-points [odds ratios (ORs) range 1.47-2.04]; and higher likelihoods of reaching HbA1c goals of < 6.5% or < 7% (ORs range 1.51-2.12) (all p < 0.05). Liraglutide users also experienced HbA1c reductions from baseline in the 2nd-year follow-up (0.53-0.33%-point, all p < 0.05). Although liraglutide users incurred higher healthcare costs than sitagliptin users during the 1st-year follow-up, they had $2674 (per patient) lower all-cause medical costs (adjusted cost ratio: 0.67, p < 0.05) and similar total costs (all-cause and diabetes-related) in the 2nd year.

CONCLUSION

Long-term use of liraglutide for 1 or 2 years was associated with better glycemic control than using sitagliptin. Savings in medical costs were realized for liraglutide users during the 2nd year of persistent treatment, which offset differences in pharmacy costs.

FUNDING

Novo Nordisk Inc.