Burr hole drainage and burr hole drainage with irrigation to treat chronic subdural hematoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy of neuroendoscopy-assisted surgery in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common diseases in neurosurgery. It is the result of chronic intracranial hemorrhage that converges between the dura mater and arachnoid three weeks after externally injuring the head. Chronic subdural hematomas are a common complication in neurosurgery. With the gradual increase in the amount of hematoma, the surrounding brain tissue is pushed and compressed, resulting in corresponding clinical symptoms and signs. It is reported that the overall incidence rate of CSDH is 1.72 to 20.6 per 100,000 people every year, and the incidence rate of the elderly is particularly high.

METHODS

The computer retrieves eight databases to obtain controlled trials at home and abroad on the effects of neuroendoscopy-assisted surgery in patients with chronic subdural hematoma. After a rigorous literature quality evaluation, data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were ultimately included in this meta-analysis. Seventeen studies reported the Recurrence rate of the test group and the control group, which was significantly lower (OR 0.27; 95% Cl 0.18, 0.38; P < 0.01) than the control group, Recovery rate (OR 1.18; 95% Cl 1.01, 1.38; P = 0.03), Total effective rate (OR 1.11; 95% Cl 1.04, 1.17; P < 0.01), Operative time (SMD 15.78; 95% Cl 9.69, 21.86; P < 0.01), Hospital stay (SMD - 1.66; 95% Cl - 2.17, - 1.14; P < 0.01) and Complications (OR 0.48; 95% Cl 0.30, 0.78; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that neuroendoscopy-assisted surgery may be effective in patients with chronic subdural hematoma, as evidenced by recurrence rate, recovery rate, total effective rate, operative time, hospital stay, complications, and the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality studies.

Comparative clinical outcomes of irrigation techniques in burr-hole craniostomy for chronic subdural hemorrhage: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Chronic Subdural Hemorrhage(cSDH) is often treated with surgical blood drainage, but concerns about recurrence and outcomes persist. Surgical techniques, including irrigation, vary. This study compares the outcomes of irrigation in cSDH surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September 2020 to September 2022, 92 cSDH patients underwent surgery. Two different irrigation methods were used: extensive irrigation (IG) and non-irrigation (NIG). Method of irrigation was selected by each surgeon's preference. Parameters measured included volume of hematoma changes, midline shifting, complications, and basic demographics. Recurrence was defined as symptomatic or hematoma expansion more than double the volume before surgery. Factors predicting recurrence and irrigation method impact were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were excluded because of bilateral or related to other disease. We analyzed 81 patients (44 NIG, 37 IG). Recurrence occurred in 6 IG cases (16.2%) and 1 NIG case (2.3%). Irrigation method significantly affected recurrence (P = 0.043). Age, gender, medication, medical history, and preoperative measurements had no major impact on recurrence. NIG had unexpected cases of intracerebral hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Extensive irrigation may increase recurrence in cSDH drainage. Non-irrigation drainage had fewer recurrences, but unexpected complications arose. Careful drainage in non-irrigated cases is crucial.

Burr-hole drainage with or without irrigation for chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a Finnish, nationwide, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural haematoma is a common surgically treated intracranial emergency. Burr-hole drainage surgery, to evacuate chronic subdural haematoma, involves three elements: creation of a burr hole for access, irrigation of the subdural space, and insertion of a subdural drain. Although the subdural drain has been established as beneficial, the therapeutic effect of subdural irrigation has not been addressed.

METHODS

The FINISH trial was an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, multicentre, nationwide, randomised, controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial in five neurosurgical units in Finland that enrolled adults aged 18 years or older with a chronic subdural haematoma requiring burr-hole drainage. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated block randomisation with block sizes of four, six, or eight, stratified by site, to burr-hole drainage either with or without subdural irrigation. All patients and staff were masked to treatment assignment apart from the neurosurgeon and operating room staff. A burr hole was drilled at the site of maximum haematoma thickness in both groups, and the subdural space was either irrigated or not irrigated before inserting a subdural drain, which remained in place for 48 h. Reoperations, functional outcome, mortality, and adverse events were recorded for 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome was the reoperation rate within 6 months. The non-inferiority margin was set at 7·5%. Key secondary outcomes that were also required to conclude non-inferiority were the proportion of participants with unfavourable functional outcomes (ie, modified Rankin Scale score of 4-6, where 0 indicates no symptoms and 6 indicates death) and mortality rate at 6 months. The primary and key secondary analyses were done in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04203550) and is completed.

FINDINGS

From Jan 1, 2020, to Aug 17, 2022, we assessed 1644 patients for eligibility and 589 (36%) patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group and treated (294 assigned to drainage with irrigation and 295 assigned to drainage without irrigation; 165 [28%] women and 424 [72%] men). The 6-month follow-up period extended until Feb 14, 2023. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 54 (18·3%) of 295 participants required reoperation in the group assigned to receive no irrigation versus 37 (12·6%) of 294 in the group assigned to receive irrigation (difference of 6·0 percentage points, 95% CI 0·2-11·7; p=0·30; adjusted for study site). There were no significant between-group differences in the proportion of people with modified Rankin Scale score of 4-6 (37 [13·1%] of 283 in the no-irrigation group vs 36 [12·6%] of 285 in the irrigation group; p=0·89) or mortality rate (18 [6·1%] of 295 in the no-irrigation group vs 21 [7·1%] of 294 in the irrigation group; p=0·58). The findings of the primary intention-to-treat analysis were not materially altered in the per-protocol analysis. There were no significant between-group differences in the number of adverse events, and the most frequent severe adverse events were systemic infections (26 [8·8%] of 295 participants who did not receive irrigation vs 22 [7·5%] of 294 participants who received irrigation), intracranial haemorrhage (13 [4·4%] vs seven [2·4%]), and epileptic seizures (five [1·7%] vs nine [3·1%]).

INTERPRETATION

We could not conclude non-inferiority of burr-hole drainage without irrigation. The reoperation rate was 6·0 percentage points higher after burr-hole drainage without subdural irrigation than with subdural irrigation. Considering that there were no differences in functional outcome or mortality between the groups, the trial favours the use of subdural irrigation.

FUNDING

State Fund for University Level Health Research (Helsinki University Hospital), Finska Läkaresällskapet, Medicinska Understödsföreningen Liv och Hälsa, and Svenska Kulturfonden.

Irrigation versus no irrigation in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 1581 patients

Burr hole craniotomy is a common technique employed in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. However, its effectiveness and the occurrence of additional complications with various irrigation techniques utilized during the surgery remain unclear. The paper aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of burr hole craniotomy with and without irrigation in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. We conducted a systematic review by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid, and Web of Science for comparative studies that fit the eligibility criteria. All studies up to January 2023 were included, and the two groups were compared based on five primary outcomes using Review Manager Software. Data reported as odds ratio (OR) or risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Our analysis included 12 studies with a total of 1581 patients. There was no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of recurrence rate (OR = 0.94; 95% CI [0.55, 1.06], p-value = 0.81) and mortality rate (RR = 1.05, 95% CI [0.46, 2.40], p-value = 0.91). Similarly, there was no significant difference in postoperative infection (RR = 1.15, 95% CI [0.16, 8.05], p-value = 0.89) or postoperative pneumocephalus (RR = 2.56, 95% CI [0.95, 6.89], p-value = 0.06). The burr hole drainage with irrigation technique was insignificantly associated with a higher risk of postoperative hemorrhagic complication (RR = 2.23, 95% CI [0.94, 5.29], p-value = 0.07); however, sensitivity analysis showed significant association based on the results of two studies (RR = 4.6, 95% CI [1.23, 17.25], p-value = 0.024). The two techniques showed comparable recurrence, mortality rate, postoperative infection, and postoperative pneumocephalus results. However, irrigation in burr hole craniotomy could possibly have a higher risk of postoperative hemorrhage compared with no irrigation, as observed during sensitivity analysis, which requires to be confirmed by other studies. Further research and randomized controlled trials are required to understand these observations better and their applicability in clinical practice.

Efficacy of intraoperative irrigation with artificial cerebrospinal fluid in chronic subdural hematoma surgery: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The surgical techniques for treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), a common neurosurgical condition, have been discussed in a lot of clinical literature. However, the recurrence proportion after CSDH surgery remains high, ranging from 10 to 20%. The standard surgical procedure for CSDH involves a craniostomy to evacuate the hematoma, but irrigating the hematoma cavity during the procedure is debatable. The authors hypothesized that the choice of irrigation fluid might be a key factor affecting the outcomes of surgery. This multicenter randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether intraoperative irrigation using artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACF) followed by the placement of a subdural drain would yield superior results compared to the placement of a subdural drain alone for CSDH.

METHODS

The study will be conducted across 19 neurosurgical departments in Japan. The 1186 eligible patients will be randomly allocated to two groups: irrigation using ACF or not. In either group, a subdural drain is to be placed for at least 12 h postoperatively. Similar to what was done in previous studies, we set the proportion of patients that meet the criteria for ipsilateral reoperation at 7% in the irrigation group and 12% in the non-irrigation group. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who meet the criteria for ipsilateral reoperation within 6 months of surgery (clinical worsening of symptoms and increased hematoma on imaging compared with the postoperative state). The secondary endpoints are the proportion of reoperations within 6 months, the proportion being stratified by preoperative hematoma architecture by computed tomography (CT) scan, neurological symptoms, patient condition, mortality at 6 months, complications associated with surgery, length of hospital stay from surgery to discharge, and time of the surgical procedure.

DISCUSSION

We present the study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial to investigate our hypothesis that intraoperative irrigation with ACF reduces the recurrence proportion after the removal of chronic subdural hematomas compared with no irrigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov jRCT1041220124. Registered on January 13, 2023.

Risk factors for recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma after surgical evacuation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition. Surgical evacuation has remained the primary treatment despite many advancements in the endovascular field. Regardless, recurrence requiring reoperation is commonly observed during the postoperative follow-up. Herein, we aimed to investigate risk factors for recurrence after surgical evacuation. A review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted using the designed search string. Studies were reviewed based on the predefined eligibility criteria. Data regarding sixty potential risk factors along with operational information were extracted for analysis. A meta-analysis using the random-effect model was conducted, and each risk factor affecting the postoperative recurrence of CSDH was then evaluated and graded. A total of 198 records met the eligibility criteria. A total number of 8523 patients with recurrent CSDH and 56,096 with non-recurrent CSDH were included in the study. The recurrence rate after surgical evacuation was 12%. Fifteen preoperative, nine radiologic, four hematoma-related, and three operative and postoperative factors were associated with recurrence. Risk factors associated with recurrence after surgical evacuation are important in neurosurgical decision-making and treatment planning. Found risk factors in this study may be used as the basis for pre-operative risk assessment to choose patients who would benefit the most from surgical evacuation.

Efficacy of atorvastatin administration after surgery in patients with chronic subdural hematoma

To explore the clinical efficacy of atorvastatin administration after surgery in patients with chronic subdural hematoma. We conducted a retrospective study to analyze the clinical data of patients with chronic subdural hematoma. Patients receiving atorvastatin treatment after surgery were divided into the study group while others were divided into the control group. As the primary outcome, we compared the hematoma recurrence rate. The secondary outcomes were the remaining volume of hematoma and the activities of daily living (Barthel index) score at 3 months after discharge. A total of 53 patients were included in the study: 30 patients in the study group (n = 30) and 23 patients in the control group (n = 23). The baseline clinical data were similar in the 2 groups (P > .05). Four patients had recurrence of hematoma in the study group, while 5 patients had recurrence of hematoma in the control group [4/30 (13.3%) versus 5/23 (21.7%), P = .661] at 3 months after discharge. The mean remaining volume of hematoma was 12.10 ± 8.80 mL in the study group and 17.30 ± 9.50 mL in the control group at 3 months after discharge, respectively. The remaining volume of hematoma in the study group was less than that in the control group (P = .045).The activities of daily living score in the study group were higher than those in the control group (97.83 ± 4.48 vs 94.78 ± 5.73, P = .034) at 3 months after discharge. Atorvastatin administration after surgery barely reduce the recurrence rate of chronic subdural hematoma, however, reduced the remaining volume of hematoma and improved neurological function.

Chronic subdural hematoma drainage using anti-thrombotic catheter technique

Background

Burr hole evacuation is a well-established treatment for symptomatic cases with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Routinely postoperative catheter is left in the subdural space to drain the residual blood. Drainage obstruction is commonly seen, and it can be related to suboptimal treatment.

Methods

Two groups of patients submitted to cSDH surgery were evaluated in a retrospective non-randomized trial, one group that had conventional subdural drainage (CD group, n ​= ​20) and another group that used an anti-thrombotic catheter (AT group, n ​= ​14). We compared the obstruction rate, amount of drainage and complications. Statistical analyses were done using SPSS (v.28.0).

Results

For AT and CD groups respectively (median ​± ​IQR), the age was 68.23 ​± ​26.0 and 70.94 ​± ​21.5 (p ​> ​0.05); preoperative hematoma width was 18.3 ​± ​11.0 ​mm and 20.7 ​± ​11.7 ​mm and midline shift was 13.0 ​± ​9.2 and 5.2 ​± ​8.0 ​mm (p ​= ​0.49). Postoperative hematoma width was 12.7 ​± ​9.2 ​mm and 10.8 ​± ​9.0 ​mm (p ​< ​0.001 intra-groups compared to preoperative) and MLS was 5.2 ​± ​8.0 ​mm and 1.5 ​± ​4.3 ​mm (p ​< ​0.05 intra-groups). There were no complications related to the procedure including infection, bleed worsening and edema. No proximal obstruction was observed on the AT, but 8/20 (40%) presented proximal obstruction on the CD group (p ​= ​0.006). Daily drainage rates and length of drainage were higher in AT compared to CD: 4.0 ​± ​1.25 days vs. 3.0 ​± ​1.0 days (p ​< ​0.001) and 69.86 ​± ​106.54 vs. 35.00 ​± ​59.67 ​mL/day (p ​= ​0.074). Symptomatic recurrence demanding surgery occurred in two patients of CD group (10%) and none in AT group (p ​= ​0.230), after adjusting for MMA embolization, there was still no difference between groups (p ​= ​0.121).

Conclusion

The anti-thrombotic catheter for cSDH drainage presented significant less proximal obstruction than the conventional one and higher daily drainage rates. Both methods demonstrated to safe and effective for draining cSDH.

Use of Novel Automated Active Irrigation With Drainage Versus Passive Drainage Alone for Chronic Subdural Hematoma-A Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Study With Volumetric Analysis

BACKGROUND

Passive drainage post-surgical evacuation of symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is currently standard of care. High rates of infection, drain occlusion, and recurrence are associated complications.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the use of a novel double-lumen active automated irrigation and aspiration system, IRRAflow (IRRAS), for patients with cSDH and compared procedural and clinical outcomes against passive drainage alone with propensity score matching (PSM) and volumetric analysis.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively searched for consecutive patients presenting with cSDH. One-to-one PSM of covariates (including baseline comorbidities and presentation hematoma volume) in active and passive irrigation groups was performed to adjust for treatment selection bias. Rates of hematoma clearance, catheter-related occlusion, and infection; number of revisions; and length of hospital stay were recorded.

RESULTS

This study included 55 patients: active continuous irrigation-drainage-21 (21 post-PSM) and passive drainage-34 (21 post-PSM). For PSM groups, a significantly higher rate of hematoma clearance was obtained in the active irrigation-drainage group (0.5 ± 0.4 vs 0.4 ± 0.5 mL/day) and in the passive drainage group; odds ratio (OR) = 1.291 (CI: 1.062-1.570, P = .002) and a significantly lower rate of catheter-related infections (OR = 0.051; CI: 0.004-0.697, P = .039). A nonsignificantly lower hematoma expansion rate at discharge was noted in the active irrigation-drainage group (4.8% vs 23.8%; OR = 0.127; P = .186). No statistical difference in all-cause in-hospital mortality or discharge Glasgow Coma Scale score was observed between groups.

CONCLUSION

Active and automated continuous irrigation plus drainage after cSDH surgical evacuation resulted in faster hematoma clearance and led to favorable clinical outcomes and low complication and revision rates compared with passive irrigation.

Valve-controlled chronic subdural hematoma drainage: A feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Pneumocephalus after chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) evacuation is a potential predictor of hematoma recurrence.

RESEARCH QUESTION

To study the feasibility and safety of a novel CSDH evacuation technique using a valve-controlled method to avoid pneumocephalus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a retrospective case series, we evacuated CSDH using very low-pressure valve-controlled drains and recorded the neurological, radiological, and functional outcomes. Patients with primary CSDH, without previous neurosurgical intervention, and who did not receive antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy the week prior to the index surgery, were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were the evacuation with other treatment techniques and incomplete data files. Patients were assessed according to the Bender grading system to record the neurological status. The hematoma volume was estimated using the formula for ellipsoid volumes.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with a mean age of 73 years (±9 years) fulfilled our eligibility criteria. Our technique was effective since it decreased the CSDH volume from 141 ​ml (IQR 97 ​ml) to 20.6 ​ml (IQR 26.59 ​ml; p ​< ​0.001) and improved the neurological status according to the Bender grading system from two (IQR 0.25) to 1 (IQR 0). However, pneumocephalus and hematoma recurrence occurred in one case each (2.8%). At six months, all patients returned to their previous status, except for two patients (5.6%) who died due to irrelevant pathologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Valve-controlled CSDH evacuation aiming to decrease the postoperative pneumocephalus and hematoma recurrence constitutes an effective and safe alternative. However, larger randomized controlled studies are required to establish its role in CSDH management.

Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Scoping Review

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical entities, especially in the elderly population. Diagnosis is usually established via a head computed tomography, while an increasing number of studies are investigating biomarkers to predict the natural history of cSDH, including progression and recurrence. Surgical evacuation remains the mainstay of treatment in the overwhelming majority of cases. Nevertheless, many controversies are associated with the nuances of surgical treatment. We performed a systematic review of the literature between 2010 and 2022, aiming to identify and address the issues in cSDH surgical management where consensus is lacking. The results show ambiguous data in regard to indication, the timing and type of surgery, the duration of drainage, concomitant membranectomy and the need for embolization of the middle meningeal artery. Other aspects of surgical treatment-such as the use of drainage and its location and number of burr holes-seem to have been adequately clarified: the drainage of hematoma is strongly recommended and the outcome is considered as independent of drainage location or the number of burr holes.

Adjuvant Corticosteroids With Surgery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The use of adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has received considerable attention in recent years. However, there is no conclusive evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety for CSDH. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis and systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of corticosteroids as an adjuvant treatment for the treatment of CSDH. We comprehensively searched electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) to identify relevant trials that investigated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery for CSDH, published from inception until May 2021. Outcome measures included recurrence rate, all-cause mortality, good functional outcome, length of hospitalization, and adverse events. We used the Cochrane risk of bias method to evaluate the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale to evaluate the quality of observational studies. We included nine studies, consisting of three RCTs and six observational studies, that compared corticosteroids as an adjuvant treatment to surgery with surgery alone. Pooled results revealed that the risk of recurrence was significantly reduced in patients who received adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery compared to those who underwent surgery alone (relative risk [RR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39–0.69, p < 0.00001). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between these groups in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.37–2.23, p = 0.83), good functional outcome (RR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.96–1.10, p = 0.47), length of hospitalization (MD = 0.35, 95% CI = –2.23 to 1.67, p = 0.83), and infection rates (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.64–1.53, p = 0.95). Adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery reduce the risk of recurrence of CDSH, but do not improve the all-cause mortality or functional outcome, as compared to surgery alone. These findings support the use of adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery for CSDH patients. Further high-quality RCTs are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of adjuvant corticosteroids in the treatment of CSDH patients.

Hematoma subdural crónico: Una patología común de manejo complejo

Antecedentes:

El hematoma subdural crónico (HSDC) es una patología ampliamente estudiada, muy frecuente, sobre todo en adultos mayores; su cuadro clínico tiene una apariencia benigna y suele ir acompañado de múltiples comorbilidades asociadas a la edad, lo que resulta en un aumento de las complicaciones e incluso la muerte. Con el incremento de la expectativa de vida a nivel mundial, el uso de medicamentos antitrombóticos es cada vez más frecuente. El papel de estos fármacos en la evolución de la enfermedad como en la recurrencia, sigue siendo motivo de discusión.

Métodos:

Los autores revisaron la fisiopatología y características clínicas del HSDC. El presente artículo discute acerca de las terapéuticas actuales y las nuevas opciones de tratamiento que podrían mejorar los resultados. Este manuscrito es susceptible de cambios en el tiempo, con el desarrollo científico y tecnológico.

Resultados:

El HSDC puede ser abordado por vía quirúrgica y farmacológica; no obstante, un manejo individualizado requiere la consideracion cuidadosa de diversos factores. A pesar de los avances en el campo de la neurocirugía, la clásica trepanación craneal sigue siendo el Gold estándar en el HSDC y sobre todo en pacientes con síntomas graves. Se debe resaltar que aún hay aspectos de este procedimiento (como la localización del dren, número de drenajes, el efecto de la irrigación, la temperatura de la solución con que se irriga, etc.) que siguen siendo materia de estudio.

Conclusiones:

Entender el mecanismo de la enfermedad ha permitido explicar su historia natural y a su vez proponer nuevas alternativas de tratamiento. El manejo médico (atorvastatina, corticoides) ha generado gran interés por sus alentadores resultados preliminares. Recientemente, se ha reportado la terapia endovascular como una alternativa segura y existe gran expectativa por confirmar su efecto en estudios más grandes.

Use of siphon irrigation during burr-hole craniostomy to evacuate chronic subdural hematoma: A retrospective cohort comparison study

Burr-hole craniostomy (BHC) is a widely accepted treatment for chronic subdural hematomas (CSDHs). This study adopted siphon irrigation to evacuate CSDHs and investigated its efficacy and safety as compared with the traditional irrigation used in BHC.A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a center between January 2017 and December 2018. The data of 171 patients who underwent burr-hole craniostomy for CSDH were collected and analyzed. A total of 68 patients underwent siphon irrigation (siphon group) and 103 patients were treated by a traditional method (control group). A follow-up was conducted 6 months after the surgery.No significant difference was observed in the baseline characteristics and preoperative computed tomography (CT) features of the 2 groups (P > .05). The postoperative CT features of the siphon group, which included the volume of hematoma evacuation (P = .034), hematoma evacuation rate (P < .001), recovery rate of the midline shift (P = .017), and occurrence of pneumocephalus (P = .037) were significantly different and better than those of the control group. The length of hospital stay after surgery of the siphon group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P = .015). The Markwalder score of the siphon group was significantly superior to that of the control group on postoperative day 1 (P = .006). Although the recurrence rate in the siphon group (2/68, 2.5%) was lower than that in the control group (11/103, 8.9%), no statistically significant difference was observed between them (P = .069). Moreover, no significant differences were observed in terms of complications and mortality rate between the 2 groups.There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the groups that underwent siphon irrigation and traditional irrigation. However, in comparison, siphon irrigation can better improve postoperative CT features, promote early recovery of neurological dysfunction after surgery, and shorten the length of hospital stay. This indicates that siphon irrigation may be a better therapeutic option in BHC for CSDH.

Predictors of acute intracranial hemorrhage and recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma following burr hole drainage

Background

To investigate predictors of postoperative acute intracranial hemorrhage (AIH) and recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) after burr hole drainage.

Methods

A multicenter retrospective study of patients who underwent burr hole drainage for CSDH between January 2013 and March 2019.

Results

A total of 448 CSDH patients were enrolled in the study. CSDH recurrence occurred in 60 patients, with a recurrence rate of 13.4%. The mean time interval between initial burr hole drainage and recurrence was 40.8 ± 28.3 days. Postoperative AIH developed in 23 patients, with an incidence of 5.1%. The mean time interval between initial burr hole drainage and postoperative AIH was 4.7 ± 2.9 days. Bilateral hematoma, hyperdense hematoma and anticoagulant drug use were independent predictors of recurrence in the multiple logistic regression analyses. Preoperative headache was an independent risk factor of postoperative AIH in the multiple logistic regression analyses, however, intraoperative irrigation reduced the incidence of postoperative AIH.

Conclusions

This study found that bilateral hematoma, hyperdense hematoma and anticoagulant drug use were independently associated with CSDH recurrence. Clinical presentation of headache was the strongest predictor of postoperative AIH, and intraoperative irrigation decreased the incidence of postoperative AIH.

Effect of Different Factors on the Short-Term Outcome of Chinese Patients With Primary Chronic Subdural Hematoma at Different Age Groups: A Two-Center Retrospective Study

Background

The incidence of symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is increasing in Chinese aging population, but its clinical and demographic knowledge is still lacking. This study sought to outline the clinical and demographic data of CSDH patients from two medical centers in Tianjin and Chongqing to provide a better understanding for CSDH treatment in China.

Methods

Age, sex, etiologies, conscious level on admission, treatment strategies, outcome at discharge, recurrence, and concomitant disease of enrolled patients were recorded. The data were further analyzed after the patients were sub-grouped into young/middle (less than 60 years old) and old (over than 60 years old) age groups.

Results

A total of 1281 CSDH patients were enrolled. Of these, 85.01% were male and 51.91% were aged between 60 and 80 years. 57.61% patients encountered head trauma before diagnosing CSDH. The top three clinical symptoms at admission were headache (58.55%), dyskinesia (36.92%), and dizziness (33.96%). Headache as well as dizziness often happened in young/middle age group, while dyskinesia often occurred in the old age group. The most common concomitant diseases were cardio-cerebrovascular system diseases (41.14%). The concomitant respiratory diseases in aged patients led to unfavorable outcomes (p = 0.049, OR:0.357). The prognosis of old age subgroup receiving conservative treatment was better than those who received burr-hole drainage treatment (p < 0.015, OR:4.091).

Conclusion

CSDH mostly occurs in aged and male population with a history a head trauma. The respiratory disease often results in unfavorable outcomes in aged patients. Conservative treatment might benefit some patients.

Embolization of the Middle meningeal artery in chronic subdural hematoma - A systematic review

Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) are one of the most frequent reasons for consultation in neurosurgery. Multiple authors have proposed middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) as an option in cSDH patients to manage recurrence or avoid surgery altogether. Although many articles have been published on the matter, the current body of evidence still has to be evaluated before MMAE is integrated into clinical practice. The goal of this study was to review the evidence on MMAE in cSDH to assess its safety, feasibility, indications and efficacy. We performed a systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA guidelines using multiple electronic databases. Our search yielded a total of 18 original articles from which data were extracted. A total of 190 patients underwent MMAE from which 81.3% were symptomatic cSDH. Over half (52.3%) of the described population were undergoing antithrombotic therapy. Most (83%) procedures used polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles and no complications were reported regarding the embolization procedures. Although the definition of resolution varied among authors, cSDH resolution was reported in 96.8% of cases. MMAE is a feasible technique for cSDH, but the current body of evidence does not yet support its use as a standard treatment. Further studies with a higher level of evidence are necessary before MMAE can be formally recommended.