Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with hepatic metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary

Identifying the primary tumour in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) using [18F]FDG PET/CT: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

PURPOSE

In this systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis, we analysed the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT in detecting primary tumours in patients with CUP and evaluated whether the location of the predominant metastatic site influences the diagnostic performance.

METHODS

A systematic literature search from January 2005 to February 2024 was performed to identify articles describing the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT for primary tumour detection in CUP. Individual patient data retrieved from original articles or obtained from corresponding authors were grouped by the predominant metastatic site. The diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT in detecting the underlying primary tumour was compared between predominant metastatic sites.

RESULTS

A total of 1865 patients from 32 studies were included. The largest subgroup included patients with predominant bone metastases (n = 622), followed by liver (n = 369), lymph node (n = 358), brain (n = 316), peritoneal (n = 70), lung (n = 67), and soft tissue (n = 23) metastases, leaving a small group of other/undefined metastases (n = 40). [18F]FDG PET/CT resulted in pooled detection rates to identify the primary tumour of 0.74 (for patients with predominant brain metastases), 0.54 (liver-predominant), 0.49 (bone-predominant), 0.46 (lung-predominant), 0.38 (peritoneal-predominant), 0.37 (lymph node-predominant), and 0.35 (soft-tissue-predominant).

CONCLUSION

This individual patient data meta-analysis suggests that the ability of [18F]FDG PET/CT to identify the primary tumour in CUP depends on the distribution of metastatic sites. This finding emphasises the need for more tailored diagnostic approaches in different patient populations. In addition, alternative diagnostic tools, such as new PET tracers or whole-body (PET/)MRI, should be investigated.

False Liver Metastasis by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Scan after Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer-Potential Overstaged Pitfalls of Treatment

In patients with esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), subsequent restaging with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) can reveal the presence of interval metastases, such as liver metastases, in approximately 10% of cases. Nevertheless, it is not uncommon in clinical practice to observe focal FDG uptake in the liver that is not associated with liver metastases but rather with radiation-induced liver injury (RILI), which can result in the overstaging of the disease. Liver radiation damage is also a concern during distal esophageal cancer radiotherapy due to its proximity to the left liver lobe, typically included in the radiation field. Post-CRT, if FDG activity appears in the left or caudate liver lobes, a thorough investigation is needed to confirm or rule out distant metastases. The increased FDG uptake in liver lobes post-CRT often presents a diagnostic dilemma. Distinguishing between radiation-induced liver disease and metastasis is vital for appropriate patient management, necessitating a combination of imaging techniques and an understanding of the factors influencing the radiation response. Diagnosis involves identifying new foci of hepatic FDG avidity on PET/CT scans. Geographic regions of hypoattenuation on CT and well-demarcated regions with specific enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced CT scans and MRI are characteristic of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD). Lack of mass effect on all three modalities (CT, MRI, PET) indicates RILD. Resolution of abnormalities on subsequent examinations also helps in diagnosing RILD. Moreover, it can also help to rule out occult metastases, thereby excluding those patients from further surgery who will not benefit from esophagectomy with curative intent.

2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT in Cancer of Unknown Primary Tumor-A Retrospective Register-Based Cohort Study

We investigated the impact of 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT on detection rate (DR) of the primary tumor and survival in patients with suspected cancer of unknown primary tumor (CUP), comparing it to the conventional diagnostic imaging method, CT. Patients who received a tentative CUP diagnosis at Odense University Hospital from 2014-2017 were included. Patients receiving a 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT were assigned to the 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT group and patients receiving a CT only to the CT group. DR was calculated as the proportion of true positive findings of 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT and CT scans, separately, using biopsy of the primary tumor, autopsy, or clinical decision as reference standard. Survival analyses included Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for age, sex, treatment, and propensity score. We included 193 patients. Of these, 159 were in the 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT group and 34 were in the CT group. DR was 36.5% in the 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT group and 17.6% in the CT group, respectively (p = 0.012). Median survival was 7.4 (95% CI 0.4-98.7) months in the 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT group and 3.8 (95% CI 0.2-98.1) in the CT group. Survival analysis showed a crude hazard ratio of 0.63 (p = 0.024) and an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.68 (p = 0.087) for the 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT group compared with CT. This study found a significantly higher DR of the primary tumor in suspected CUP patients using 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT compared with patients receiving only CT, with possible immense clinical importance. No significant difference in survival was found, although a possible tendency towards longer survival in the 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT group was observed.

68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT, a new step in breast cancer imaging: a comparative pilot study with the 18F-FDG PET/CT

AIM

We aimed to compare the roles of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of primary tumor and metastases in primary and recurrent breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Twenty female patients with histopathologically confirmed primary and recurrent breast cancer were included in the prospective study. All patients underwent FDG and FAPI PET/CT imaging in the same week. The number of primary and metastatic lesions, SUVmax values, and tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) were recorded from both scans. Data obtained were statistically compared.

RESULTS

FAPI PET/CT was superior to FDG in detecting breast lesions, as well as hepatic, bone, lymph node, and cerebral metastases in terms of patient- and lesion-based assessments. The sensitivity and specificity of FAPI in detecting primary breast lesions were 100% and 95.6%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of FDG were 78.2% and 100%, respectively. The SUVmax values of primary breast tumors, lymph nodes, lung metastases, and bone metastases were significantly higher on FAPI imaging than FDG imaging (p < 0.05). However, SUVmax values of hepatic metastases did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between two imaging techniques (p > 0.05). Also, FAPI imaging yielded significantly higher TBR in breast lesions as well as hepatic, bone, brain and lung metastases compared to FDG (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT is superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting the primary tumor in patients with breast cancer with its high sensitivity, high SUVmax, and high TBR. 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT is also superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting lymph node, hepatic, bone, and cerebral metastases because it has lower background activity and higher uptake in subcentimetric lesions.