1
|
Kummer I, Lüthi A, Klingler G, Andereggen L, Urman RD, Luedi MM, Stieger A. Adjuvant Analgesics in Acute Pain - Evaluation of Efficacy. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2024:10.1007/s11916-024-01276-w. [PMID: 38865074 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01276-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW Acute postoperative pain impacts a significant number of patients and is associated with various complications, such as a higher occurrence of chronic postsurgical pain as well as increased morbidity and mortality. RECENT FINDINGS Opioids are often used to manage severe pain, but they come with serious adverse effects, such as sedation, respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and impaired bowel function. Therefore, most enhanced recovery after surgery protocols promote multimodal analgesia, which includes adjuvant analgesics, to provide optimal pain control. In this article, we aim to offer a comprehensive review of the contemporary literature on adjuvant analgesics in the management of acute pain, especially in the perioperative setting. Adjuvant analgesics have proven efficacy in treating postoperative pain and reducing need for opioids. While ketamine is an established option for opioid-dependent patients, magnesium and α2-agonists have, in addition to their analgetic effect, the potential to attenuate hemodynamic responses, which make them especially useful in painful laparoscopic procedures. Furthermore, α2-agonists and dexamethasone can extend the analgesic effect of regional anesthesia techniques. However, findings for lidocaine remain inconclusive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Kummer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rescue- and Pain Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
| | - Andreas Lüthi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rescue- and Pain Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Gabriela Klingler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rescue- and Pain Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Andereggen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital of Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Richard D Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Markus M Luedi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rescue- and Pain Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Stieger
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rescue- and Pain Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barakat H, Al Nawwar R, Abou Nader J, Aouad M, Yazbeck Karam V, Gholmieh L. Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in major spine surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Minerva Anestesiol 2024; 90:482-490. [PMID: 38869262 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.24.17962-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and increased opioid consumption. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is thought to provide adequate intraoperative analgesia with reduced postoperative opioid consumption. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of intraoperative OFA approach to the conventional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) on postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and related side effects in patients undergoing multilevel spinal fusion surgery. METHODS Forty-eight patients undergoing elective major spine surgery were randomly allocated to either receive intraoperative dexmedetomidine and lidocaine (OFA group) or fentanyl during induction and intraoperative remifentanil (OBA group). All patients received intraoperative sevoflurane, propofol, rocuronium, ketamine, dexamethasone, ondansetron and postoperative paracetamol and patient-controlled analgesia device set to deliver intravenous morphine for 48 hours after surgery. Postoperative pain was measured using numerical rating scale. Opioid side effects were documented, when present. RESULTS OFA group required less morphine in the first 24 hours post-surgery (17.28±12.25 mg versus 27.96±19.75 mg, P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly lower in the OFA group. More patients in the OFA group required antihypertensive medications compared to patients in the OBA group (P<0.05). In the post anesthesia care unit, OFA patients had a significantly longer stay than OBA patients (114.1±49.33 min versus 89.96±30.71 min, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS OFA can be an alternative to OBA in patients undergoing multilevel spine fusion surgery. OFA reduces opioids consumption in the first 24 hours and PONV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanane Barakat
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon -
| | - Rony Al Nawwar
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Jessy Abou Nader
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Marie Aouad
- Department of Anesthesiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Vanda Yazbeck Karam
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Linda Gholmieh
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bloc S, Alfonsi P, Belbachir A, Beaussier M, Bouvet L, Campard S, Campion S, Cazenave L, Diemunsch P, Di Maria S, Dufour G, Fabri S, Fletcher D, Garnier M, Godier A, Grillo P, Huet O, Joosten A, Lasocki S, Le Guen M, Le Saché F, Macquer I, Marquis C, de Montblanc J, Maurice-Szamburski A, Nguyen YL, Ruscio L, Zieleskiewicz L, Caillard A, Weiss E. Guidelines on perioperative optimization protocol for the adult patient 2023. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2023; 42:101264. [PMID: 37295649 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The French Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine [Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR)] aimed at providing guidelines for the implementation of perioperative optimization programs. DESIGN A consensus committee of 29 experts from the SFAR was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. METHODS Four fields were defined: 1) Generalities on perioperative optimization programs; 2) Preoperative measures; 3) Intraoperative measures and; 4) Postoperative measures. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer a number of questions formulated according to the PICO model (population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out using predefined keywords according to PRISMA guidelines and analyzed using the GRADE® methodology. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE® methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method. As the GRADE® methodology could have been fully applied for the vast majority of questions, the recommendations were formulated using a "formalized expert recommendations" format. RESULTS The experts' work on synthesis and application of the GRADE® method resulted in 30 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 were found to have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and ten a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). For one recommendation, the GRADE methodology could not be fully applied, resulting in an expert opinion. Two questions did not find any response in the literature. After two rounds of rating and several amendments, strong agreement was reached for all the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Strong agreement among the experts was obtained to provide 30 recommendations for the elaboration and/or implementation of perioperative optimization programs in the highest number of surgical fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Bloc
- Clinical Research Department, Ambroise Pare Hospital Group, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France; Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique Drouot Sport, Paris, France.
| | - Pascal Alfonsi
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Paris Descartes, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, F-75674 Paris Cedex 14, France
| | - Anissa Belbachir
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, UF Douleur, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, APHP.Centre, Site Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Marc Beaussier
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Lionel Bouvet
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Lyon, France
| | | | - Sébastien Campion
- AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, F-75013 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Laure Cazenave
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Groupe Jeunes, French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR), 75016 Paris, France
| | - Pierre Diemunsch
- Unité de Réanimation Chirurgicale, Service d'Anesthésie-réanimation Chirurgicale, Pôle Anesthésie-Réanimations Chirurgicales, Samu-Smur, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, Avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Sophie Di Maria
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Dufour
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU de Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Fabri
- Faculty of Economics, Management & Accountancy, University of Malta, Malta
| | - Dominique Fletcher
- Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Ambroise-Paré, Service d'Anesthésie, 9, Avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Marc Garnier
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Périopératoire Rive Droite, Paris, France
| | - Anne Godier
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | | | - Olivier Huet
- CHU de Brest, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Brest, France
| | - Alexandre Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Villejuif, France
| | | | - Morgan Le Guen
- Paris Saclay University, Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - Frédéric Le Saché
- Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique Drouot Sport, Paris, France; DMU DREAM Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Macquer
- Bordeaux University Hospitals, Bordeaux, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Department, Bordeaux, France
| | - Constance Marquis
- Clinique du Sport, Département d'Anesthésie et Réanimation, Médipole Garonne, 45 rue de Gironis - CS 13 624, 31036 Toulouse Cedex 1, France
| | - Jacques de Montblanc
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | | | - Yên-Lan Nguyen
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, Cochin Academic Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Laura Ruscio
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; INSERM U 1195, Université Paris-Saclay, Saint-Aubin, Île-de-France, France
| | - Laurent Zieleskiewicz
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, C2VN, France
| | - Anaîs Caillard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Cavale Blanche Université de Bretagne Ouest, Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Department, Brest, France
| | - Emmanuel Weiss
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP, Nord, Clichy, France; University of Paris, Paris, France; Inserm UMR_S1149, Centre for Research on Inflammation, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Complex spinal surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain. The purpose of this paper is to review recent literature on postoperative pain management in adult and adolescent patients having complex spinal surgery. RECENT FINDINGS We conducted a literature search using the Medline database for relevant publications from 2020 to 2022 on postoperative pain after complex spinal surgery. Although opioids remain the mainstay to manage pain after complex spinal surgery, they are associated with adverse effects. Multimodal analgesia may be used to reduce these adverse effects by combining different drugs targeting different parts of the pain pathway. Recent publications suggest continuous low dose fentanyl or morphine infusion, methadone, intravenous paracetamol and ibuprofen, ketorolac, ketamine, magnesium infusion, lidocaine infusion and dexmedetomidine appear to be effective and safe to manage pain after complex spinal surgery. Regional techniques including bilateral erector spinae block, interfascial plane block and intrathecal morphine also appear to be effective and safe. SUMMARY Pain management after complex spinal surgery remains challenging. Therefore, further studies are still required to determine the optimal multimodal analgesic regimen for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Way Siong Koh
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital
| | - Kate Leslie
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital.,Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Effect of intravenous lidocaine on pain after head and neck cancer surgery (ELICO trial): A randomised controlled trial. Ugeskr Laeger 2022; 39:735-742. [PMID: 35852564 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of postoperative pain after ear, nose and throat (ENT) cancer surgery is mainly morphine administration. Additional systemic lidocaine has shown promising results in some surgical procedures. OBJECTIVE The main objective was to evaluate morphine consumption in the first 48 postoperative hours after intra-operative lidocaine infusion during major ENT cancer surgery. DESIGN A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING Bicentric study including a university hospital and a major cancer centre, conducted from December 2016 to December 2019. PATIENTS A total of 144 patients undergoing major ENT cancer surgery were included. INTERVENTION The patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous lidocaine or placebo during surgery and in the recovery room. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Endpoints were postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24 and 48 h postoperatively, intra-operative remifentanil consumption, adverse events occurrence and assessment 3 to 6 months after surgery with the McGill pain questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 118 patients were included (lidocaine n = 57; placebo n = 61, 26 patients were excluded). There was no significant difference in morphine consumption during the first 48 postoperative hours in the lidocaine group compared with the placebo group with a median [IQR] of 0.60 [0.30 to 1.03] mg kg -1 vs. 0.57 [0.37 to 0.96] mg kg -1 , total dose 44 [21 to 73.3] mg vs. 38 [23.3 to 56.5] mg, P = 0.92.There was no significant difference between the two groups in any of the other endpoints, including at follow up 3 to 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSION Intravenous lidocaine in ENT cancer surgery did not show any additional analgesic or morphine-sparing effect 48 h after surgery. Three to six months after surgery, there was no significant difference in pain scores or consumption of analgesics. Patients treated pre-operatively with opioids were not evaluated in the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02894710 and EUDRACT number 2015-005799-90.
Collapse
|
6
|
Prabhakar NK, Chadwick AL, Nwaneshiudu C, Aggarwal A, Salmasi V, Lii TR, Hah JM. Management of Postoperative Pain in Patients Following Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15:4535-4549. [PMID: 35528286 PMCID: PMC9075013 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s292698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Perioperative pain management is a unique challenge in patients undergoing spine surgery due to the increased incidence of both pre-existing chronic pain conditions and chronic postsurgical pain. Peri-operative planning and counseling in spine surgery should involve an interdisciplinary approach that includes consideration of patient-level risk factors, as well as pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic pain management techniques. Consideration of psychological factors and patient focused education as an adjunct to these measures is paramount in developing a personalized perioperative pain management plan. Understanding the currently available body of knowledge surrounding perioperative opioid management, management of opioid use disorder, regional/neuraxial anesthetic techniques, ketamine/lidocaine infusions, non-opioid oral analgesics, and behavioral interventions can be useful in developing a comprehensive, multi-modal treatment plan among patients undergoing spine surgery. Although many of these techniques have proved efficacious in the immediate postoperative period, long-term follow-up is needed to define the impact of such approaches on persistent pain and opioid use. Future techniques involving the use of precision medicine may help identify phenotypic and physiologic characteristics that can identify patients that are most at risk of developing persistent postoperative pain after spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitin K Prabhakar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Andrea L Chadwick
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Perioperative Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Chinwe Nwaneshiudu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anuj Aggarwal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Vafi Salmasi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Theresa R Lii
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer M Hah
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Singleton M, Ghisi D, Memtsoudis S. Perioperative management in complex spine surgery: a narrative review. Minerva Anestesiol 2022; 88:396-406. [PMID: 35315618 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.22.15933-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The last two decades have seen a significant increase in the number of spine surgical procedures performed worldwide. This type of surgery includes a wide variety of procedures, from mini-invasive discectomies to multi-level spinal arthrodesis and osteotomies. Moreover, different surgical approaches are described at different spine levels: the anesthesiologist should be aware of the potential benefits and risks for the patients and be prepared for their management. In this narrative review we seek to describe basic concepts of perioperative spine care and address evolving areas in which care is changing. We will discuss preoperative concerns, intraoperative management including airway management, choice of maintenance, intraoperative neuromonitoring and anesthetic effect, blood management and the dynamic topic of anesthetic and analgesic techniques. Finally, we will briefly address the issue of perioperative complications as they relate specifically to spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Singleton
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniela Ghisi
- Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy -
| | - Stavros Memtsoudis
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McEvoy MD, Raymond BL, Krige A. Opioid-Sparing Perioperative Analgesia Within Enhanced Recovery Programs. Anesthesiol Clin 2022; 40:35-58. [PMID: 35236582 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Opioid-based analgesia in the perioperative period can provide excellent pain control, but this approach exposes the patient to avoidable side effects and possible harm. Optimal analgesia, an approach that targets the fastest functional recovery with adequate pain control while minimizing side effects, can be achieved with opioid minimization. Many different options for nonopioid multimodal analgesia exist and have been shown to be efficacious, with certain modalities being more beneficial for specific surgeries. This review will present the evidence and practical tips for these management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D McEvoy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 1301 Medical Center Drive, TVC 4619, Nashville, TN 37221, USA; Perioperative Medicine Fellowship, Hi-RiSE Perioperative Optimization Clinic, Perioperative Consult Service, VUMC ERAS Executive Steering Committee, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1301 Medical Center Drive, TVC 4648, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
| | - Britany L Raymond
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 1301 Medical Center Drive, TVC 4619, Nashville, TN 37221, USA; Perioperative Medicine Fellowship, Hi-RiSE Perioperative Optimization Clinic, Perioperative Consult Service, VUMC ERAS Executive Steering Committee, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1301 Medical Center Drive, TVC 4648, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Anton Krige
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, Haslingden Road, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim DD, Ramirez MF, Cata JP. Opioid use, misuse, and abuse: a narrative review about interventions to reduce opioid consumption and related adverse events in the perioperative setting. Minerva Anestesiol 2021; 88:300-307. [PMID: 34636223 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.21.15937-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Opioids remain the most potent and predictable drug available for perioperative analgesia and moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain. However, their efficacy has been questioned in other clinical settings. Moreover, opioids are associated with a wide variety of dose-dependent adverse events, limiting their use. The indiscriminate prescription of opioids has fueled the so-called "opioid epidemic" in the United States and other developed countries. Thus, there has been a significant effort to develop strategies to curtail their unnecessary prescription. Here, we summarize the history, current trends, and new directions in perioperative opioid prescription in an unbiased manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria F Ramirez
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Juan P Cata
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA - .,Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Enhanced Recovery After Neurosurgery. CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40140-021-00478-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|