Advances in the care of lipodystrophies

A rapid action plan to improve diagnosis and management of lipodystrophy syndromes

Introduction

Lipodystrophy syndromes are rare diseases that can present with a broad range of symptoms. Delays in diagnosis are common, which in turn, may predispose to the development of severe metabolic complications and end-organ damage. Many patients with lipodystrophy syndromes are only diagnosed after significant metabolic abnormalities arise. Prompt action by clinical teams may improve disease outcomes in lipodystrophy syndromes. The aim of the Rapid Action Plan is to serve as a set of recommendations from experts that can support clinicians with limited experience in lipodystrophy syndromes.

Methods

The Rapid Action Plan was developed using insights gathered through a series of advisory meetings with clinical experts in lipodystrophy syndromes. A skeleton template was used to facilitate interviews. A consensus document was developed, reviewed, and approved by all experts.

Results

Lipodystrophy is a clinical diagnosis. The Rapid Action Plan discusses tools that can help diagnose lipodystrophy syndromes. The roles of clinical and family history, physical exam, patient and family member photos, routine blood tests, leptin levels, skinfold measurements, imaging studies, and genetic testing are explored. Additional topics such as communicating the diagnosis to the patients/families and patient referrals are covered. A set of recommendations regarding screening and monitoring for metabolic diseases and end-organ abnormalities is presented. Finally, the treatment of lipodystrophy syndromes is reviewed.

Discussion

The Rapid Action Plan may assist clinical teams with the prompt diagnosis and holistic work-up and management of patients with lipodystrophy syndromes, which may improve outcomes for patients with this rare disease.

Clinical features of generalized lipodystrophy in Turkey: A cohort analysis

AIM

To describe the Turkish generalized lipodystrophy (GL) cohort with the frequency of each complication and the death rate during the period of the follow-up.

METHODS

This study reports on 72 patients with GL (47 families) registered at different centres in Turkey that cover all regions of the country. The mean ± SD follow-up was 86 ± 78 months.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time to diagnosis of diabetes and/or prediabetes was 16 years. Hyperglycaemia was not controlled in 37 of 45 patients (82.2%) with diabetes. Hypertriglyceridaemia developed in 65 patients (90.3%). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time to diagnosis of hypertriglyceridaemia was 14 years. Hypertriglyceridaemia was severe (≥ 500 mg/dl) in 38 patients (52.8%). Seven (9.7%) patients suffered from pancreatitis. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time to diagnosis of hepatic steatosis was 15 years. Liver disease progressed to cirrhosis in nine patients (12.5%). Liver disease was more severe in congenital lipodystrophy type 2 (CGL2). Proteinuric chronic kidney disease (CKD) developed in 32 patients (44.4%) and cardiac disease in 23 patients (31.9%). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the median time to diagnosis of CKD and cardiac disease were 25 and 45 years, respectively. Females appeared to have a more severe metabolic disease, with an earlier onset of metabolic abnormalities. Ten patients died during the follow-up period. Causes of death were end-stage renal disease, sepsis (because of recurrent intestinal perforations, coronavirus disease, diabetic foot infection and following coronary artery bypass graft surgery), myocardial infarction, heart failure because of dilated cardiomyopathy, stroke, liver complications and angiosarcoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard treatment approaches have only a limited impact and do not prevent the development of severe metabolic abnormalities and early onset of organ complications in GL.

Pelvis magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose familial partial lipodystrophy

CONTEXT

The diagnosis of familial partial lipodystrophy (FPLD) is currently made based on clinical judgement.

OBJECTIVE

There is a need for objective diagnostic tools that can diagnose FPLD accurately.

METHODS

We have developed a new method that used measurements from pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the pubis level. We evaluated measurements from a lipodystrophy cohort (n = 59; median age [25-75 percentiles]: 32 [24-44]; 48 females and 11 males) and age- and gender-matched controls (n = 29). Another dataset included MRIs from 289 consecutive patients.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis revealed a potential cut-point of ≤ 13 mm gluteal fat thickness for the diagnosis of FPLD. A combination of gluteal fat thickness ≤ 13 mm and pubic/gluteal fat ratio ≥ 2.5 (based on a ROC) provided 96.67% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 82.78-99.92%) sensitivity and 91.38% (95% CI: 81.02-97.14%) specificity in the overall cohort and 100.00% (95% CI: 87.23-100.00%) sensitivity and 90.00% (95% CI: 76.34-97.21%) specificity in females for the diagnosis of FPLD. When this approach was tested in a larger dataset of random patients, FPLD was differentiated from subjects without lipodystrophy with 96.67% (95% CI: 82.78-99.92%) sensitivity and 100.00% (95% CI: 98.73-100.00%) specificity. When only women were analyzed, the sensitivity and the specificity was 100.00% (95%CI: 87.23-100.00% and 97.95-100.00%, respectively). The performance of gluteal fat thickness and pubic/gluteal fat thickness ratio was comparable to readouts performed by radiologists with expertise in lipodystrophy.

CONCLUSION

The combined use of gluteal fat thickness and pubic/gluteal fat ratio from pelvic MRI is a promising method to diagnose FPLD that can reliably identify FPLD in women. Our findings need to be tested in larger populations and prospectively.

The advantages and pitfalls of genetic analysis in the diagnosis and management of lipid disorders

The increasing affordability of and access to next-generation DNA sequencing has increased the feasibility of incorporating genetic analysis into the diagnostic pathway for dyslipidaemia. But should genetic diagnosis be used routinely? DNA testing for any medical condition has potential benefits and pitfalls. For dyslipidaemias, the overall balance of advantages versus drawbacks differs according to the main lipid disturbance. For instance, some patients with severely elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels have a monogenic disorder, namely heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. In these patients, DNA diagnosis can be definitive, in turn yielding several benefits for patient care that tend to outweigh any potential disadvantages. In contrast, hypertriglyceridaemia is almost always a polygenic condition without a discrete monogenic basis, except for ultrarare monogenic familial chylomicronaemia syndrome. Genetic testing in patients with hypertriglyceridaemia is therefore predominantly non-definitive and evidence for benefit is presently lacking. Here we consider advantages and limitations of genetic testing in dyslipidaemias.